Rating AI Generated Magic: The Gathering Cards

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 117

  • @Sheevlord
    @Sheevlord Місяць тому +58

    Fun fact - these cards have so much nonsense and completely incoherent flavor text because they are using a custom neural network. If you ask a proper LLM (such as ChatGPT or Llama) to make a Magic card it will make something completely legible that respects the color pie. However, it's also nowhere near as fun as these crazy cards that tell to sacrifice players, tap for 10 mana, draw the whole deck or win the game 4 times.

    • @SeanMirrsen
      @SeanMirrsen Місяць тому +9

      Yeah, it's almost more accurate to call the MTGNN a neural-network-guided Markov chain generator. It doesn't write new text, it remixes and modifies specially formatted text from all existing real MtG cards, using an AI model to more-or-less fill out the right fields at least most of the time. Even then it takes a human to pick the interesting cards, out of hundreds of boring real card copies and mangled wrecks of text.

    • @Sazzxdndandmtg
      @Sazzxdndandmtg Місяць тому +1

      true

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones Місяць тому +1

      Or "Look at it"

  • @FelbloodStreaming
    @FelbloodStreaming Місяць тому +2

    1:11:00 Art AIs have a hard time knowing when to stop repeating a pattern. Usually we notice this in fingers and toes, but you also get things like battleships with too many turrets, or pagodas with hundreds of tiers. It's one of the little reminders that these things are trained to understand human words only as patterns of shapes and colors on a two dimensional canvas, and they have no concept of our 3D universe.
    The whole thing runs on breaking down an image into a fractal formula, calculating what changes will make it the most unlike the given description, and doing the opposite of that. This is hundreds of times faster than calculating what will make it look the most better, and is usually about 90% the same anyway. You repeat the process a couple dozen times and you end up with something that is 99% of good, 90% of the time.

  • @SwordfishJouster
    @SwordfishJouster Місяць тому +6

    For the record, the flavour text making less sense than stuff like types or rules text is because rules text tends to be consistent with the words it uses and the way it phrases things - that makes it easier for the AI to figure out the "rules" of what it looks like.
    Flavour text (and card names) aren't consistent like that, so the RRM AI can't really do much more than throw out a bunch of words it sees there a lot.

  • @menryyami3162
    @menryyami3162 Місяць тому +27

    Wow that Angel of the Moon card looks great for a token or maybe soldier deck. If i use the tokens for something I can still use the Angel for defense.

    • @snakes4life714
      @snakes4life714 Місяць тому +3

      Way too good lol

    • @tylerhorn3712
      @tylerhorn3712 Місяць тому

      That's the main way to play it. 2CMC for 2 1/1 tokens and a 3/3 flying wall. The flying wall has the additional text similar to "As a cost to attack, defending player searches library for a land, and places it on the battlefeild"

    • @nichtsistkostenlos6565
      @nichtsistkostenlos6565 Місяць тому +4

      If it was a 3/3 Flying Angel with Defender it would be pretty damn good, but it's technically better than that because you have the option to attack.

    • @menryyami3162
      @menryyami3162 Місяць тому

      @@nichtsistkostenlos6565 Yeah if you have the option to end it, you don't care about your opponent getting free lands.

    • @kennethjohnson5351
      @kennethjohnson5351 Місяць тому

      Would go great in a deck with Giada or Lulu for more tokens or +1s

  • @Frisko555
    @Frisko555 Місяць тому +5

    Angel of the Moon's token creating ability even makes sense with Sailor Moon's lore. During the earliest episodes of the anime there were only 3 Sailor Scouts/Senshi*. So, the tokens must represent Sailor Mars and Sailor Mercury
    Also, in the live action series, Sailor Moon gains the ability to summon Golem Soldiers (aka Putty Patrollers).
    *Senshi can be translated as "Soldier"

  • @Jzenful
    @Jzenful Місяць тому +12

    "destroy target creature that isn't a creature" target a creature, for the spell to resolve the target needs to stop being a creature in response, though then its an illegal target ... paradox

    • @anentity3606
      @anentity3606 Місяць тому +2

      Well no the initial target would have to be a "creature that isn't a creature", and therefore there are no legal targets, though the normal formatting for this would be like doom blade "target non-black creature".

  • @whaleofdarkness
    @whaleofdarkness Місяць тому +7

    The AI even thought of limited when doing the Leeches of the Bloom. It would be a nightmare to play against so it's good that it's mythic.

  • @MultiKbarry
    @MultiKbarry Місяць тому +6

    The big thing about Land-Unquisition is allowing Background commanders access to 3-4 color identity set ups.

    • @Breviparopus
      @Breviparopus Місяць тому +1

      So many people would use It just for the couloirs

  • @thebigbear4696
    @thebigbear4696 Місяць тому +1

    Plot twist: Bounty to the Jubble means pay 1 life IRL. You have to perform a ritual sacrifice.

  • @asmodean7239
    @asmodean7239 Місяць тому +4

    Nikachu really had a stroke with Scarecrow Armara. It happens to him: often, when he makes up an idea of a card and keeps reading his own mind instead of actual card, but this one was really persistent and had completely nothing to do with an opponent…

    • @thebigbear4696
      @thebigbear4696 Місяць тому

      I was sitting there thinking “is he going to notice…will chat finally get him to figure it out…”

  • @vrahnkeneisenbach9148
    @vrahnkeneisenbach9148 Місяць тому +7

    Topdeck draw: "I got a rock..."

  • @jasona1000
    @jasona1000 Місяць тому +5

    3:20 Rock lost to paper and became a useless magic card.

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones Місяць тому

      Paper peats rock 🤓

  • @thebigbear4696
    @thebigbear4696 Місяць тому +1

    My son, in my day we were honor bound to complete the ritual summoning that made us sound crazy. If we did not we were socially obliged to sacrifice this OP 2 drop. Glory be the light of the pega, that which brought the death of the Koblings.

  • @gamerargus9391
    @gamerargus9391 Місяць тому +9

    Something neat about Salt Cave is that in specifically discards 3 cards, not up to 3. So if someone has less than 3 cards in hand, they're safe from being targeted and can still play normally to some extent.

    • @Yaersulf
      @Yaersulf Місяць тому +10

      I don't think that's how it works in magic, if someone makes you discard 2 cards and you only have 1 card you still discard that one card if you were targeted by mind rot for example.

    • @gamerargus9391
      @gamerargus9391 Місяць тому

      @@Yaersulf oh, does it? I thought it had to say "up to X" for it to work on less than the specified number.

  • @pejman3
    @pejman3 Місяць тому +3

    Captain rumia reminding me I still havnt made a Rumia card for the custom MTG show

  • @charlescothran4946
    @charlescothran4946 Місяць тому +3

    Cunning Earth: when you absolutely have to play a spell this turn 😂

  • @cryptekcathekh8798
    @cryptekcathekh8798 3 дні тому

    If you interpret 'discards all the game' in 'Pick Reality' as 'all players send all cards they own to their respective graveyards', it's technically a valid card. In fact, it becomes a really strong alternate win condition, since presumably after doing this you pass the turn and your opponent decks out.* Amusingly, though, it is countered by 'Bonded Prodigy', the card immediately before this one, since if your opponent has Bonded Prodigy in their deck they can always return it from the graveyard to the battlefield instead of drawing (a replacement effect), and thus not deck out. They pass the turn to you and you deck out.**
    As for other counters, indestructible wouldn't work since this technically doesn't destroy, it just 'discards'. Hexproof wouldn't work since it just causes players to do things and doesn't target any individual creature (or any individual player - I'm not sure about that bit though). Some 'exile until end of turn' effects would save you, I think, because they are out of play for the duration? Phasing would definitely do it, since they are considered not to exist at all for the duration.
    As a more general counter, tap all of your lands for mana first to play unearth and flashback stuff, or to pay madness costs, assuming you're not tapped out. The player who is playing this probably won't be though, and will be in a better position to deal with the consequences.
    Overall, I'm sure I'm missing something, but it's kind of weird that if interpreted in this way it could be an interesting (if very disruptive and salty) card with potentially quite a bit of counterplay in any color. If it cost more it could genuinely be an interesting alternative win condition card, and if it does come to dominate the meta you can always sideboard Bonded Prodigy at two copies and maybe something to exile your opponent's Prodigies.
    * Note that 'dredge' wouldn't do it, since that requires you to mill. If you don't/can't mill, you draw a card anyway and deck out.
    ** Note that Bonded Prodigy is a Legendary Creature. By the legend rule, if both players ran two copies, then both players would survive indefinitely, possibly enough to somehow start rebuilding a board state. I don't think there is a way, since you will have no cards in hand, no mana, no lands, nothing, but who knows what crazy cards are out there. Maybe something with Unearth or Flashback {0}? Alternatively, if playing this in commander, if you somehow have a {0} base mana commander that you never cast before.

  • @mononoaware8529
    @mononoaware8529 4 дні тому

    Brainblast: "Creature that isn't a Creature" can be interpreted a second way, "Creature", "That", "Isn't", "A" as 4 different creature types. Therefore, the creature becomes a "Creature - That Isn't A Creature" and that would mean the card text could be translated into "destroy target That Isn't A Creature creature", sort of like, idk, "destroy target Demon Dragon creature" but since the word order for creature types is kind of up to the writer of the card and what sounds good, "destroy target Creature That Isn't A creature" is also valid way to specify the 4 creature types it can target.
    So it's not an oxymoron or contradiction at all. The AI understands you can't contradict yourself in card text. But it's a creature type joke, it's the AI system exhibiting something which requires an extremely literal interpretation about how creature type names can work in this type of "destroy target ____ creature" type card... Essentially it's a "who's on first" type mix-up, and it remains semantically correct based on MTG's own patterns for how creature types are formatted in card text, which is why it was generated by the random AI vectors and is considered a "valid" card. Its a "Creature - That Isn't A Creature"

  • @TheJadeFist
    @TheJadeFist Місяць тому +1

    District Forms, only says opponent casts an artifact spell, so you're free to cast them all you want. So Mycosynth Lattic and this card, and now you and only you can cast spells.

  • @hellhound22_18
    @hellhound22_18 Місяць тому +6

    A

  • @fuuryuuSKK
    @fuuryuuSKK 8 годин тому

    Flying Squirrel counts as committing a Crime, at least.

  • @pokemaster2185
    @pokemaster2185 Місяць тому +1

    Between Ravesous of another and Scarecrow Armara you end up with ridiculous levels of card advantage.

  • @sovest555
    @sovest555 Місяць тому +1

    What would be an interesting card would be "Destroy target creature with another supertype", which would hit Artifact Creatures, Enchantment Creatures, and maybe those cases when Planeswalkers become creatures depending on how the rules treat them

  • @TallDarknGruesome
    @TallDarknGruesome Місяць тому +1

    Charlie brown Halloween special callback- I got a rock.

  • @kairotox
    @kairotox Місяць тому +1

    Question: For "Screaming It Naturalized", the instant that destroys creatures that aren't creatures, I could see 2 ways to interpret this, 1. On normal MTG cards, the word after "Target" defines what the type of card is, that is being targeted. So, the syntax would be "Destroy target {card type here}." Players would normally interpret the card Screaming It Naturalized as "Destroy target {Creature} that isn't a creature." With this interpretation, maybe you could target a creature, and if it is no longer a creature when it resolves, then it goes through, so if you transform the targeted creature into an artifact or land or something while the instant is on the stack, it might work?
    Option 2: Maybe it's syntaxed like: "Destroy target {creature that isn't a creature}" Which could be shorthand for any permanent that has creature in its listed card type, but isn't currently a creature.

    • @Breviparopus
      @Breviparopus Місяць тому +1

      You can't cast it ever because there will never be a legal target

  • @pastapockets984
    @pastapockets984 Місяць тому +1

    I PLAYED A ROCK AT HIM!
    ...
    It was a 5 CMC rock...

  • @mikethered123
    @mikethered123 Місяць тому

    Some really interesting ideas this time. Love the poorly named black Phoenix.

  • @a.giovanni.m6740
    @a.giovanni.m6740 Місяць тому

    6:09
    Lechees Bloom could be combined together with something like Seedborn Muse to untap it and your lands to keep using Lechees' ability. I don't know how strong this would be, however.

  • @hurktang
    @hurktang Місяць тому

    1:00:30 , you are sleeping on Shadowborn, you can go straight from combat to "it's not even my turn". So you can skip all the end of turn effects. Which, I'm sure, could be use for all sort of broken things.

  • @FelbloodStreaming
    @FelbloodStreaming Місяць тому

    1:12:00 People have already started wearing rings designed to look like an erroneous sixth finger when committing crimes, in hopes of convincing people that any security camera footage that might otherwise catch them has been tampered with.

  • @Patogeno1000
    @Patogeno1000 29 днів тому

    8:27 If you Laelia on the battlefield and gave her trample, you absolutely WOULD want to do that (Likely in a Temur deck)

  • @ChaosCron1
    @ChaosCron1 Місяць тому

    Screaming It Naturalized would be solid if you interpreted it as applying to cards that weren't originally creature cards.
    A lot of AI cards have that "This is Still a Land" when they aren't even originally lands.
    If a card displays text similar to "This is Still a Land" but for a creature type then I think this card would be a removal for those cards.

  • @Steampunk_Kak
    @Steampunk_Kak Місяць тому

    Screaming it naturalized would be amazing if it was designed around destroying things that Were previously not a creature. Even be 2 mana at that point. Like "Destroy target creature if creature was not a creature when cast." clone spells and other things would be targeted at this point too. as well as land creatures.

  • @FelbloodStreaming
    @FelbloodStreaming Місяць тому

    24:00 Finally, a green card to combine with Phyrexian Dragon Engine

  • @kingzut
    @kingzut Місяць тому

    Scampering Tower says "defending play has no cards in hand" not "target player" so if your attacked with no cards in hand you can use it, or if any playing with no cards is attacked.

  • @wulfgrumheimfjarl3346
    @wulfgrumheimfjarl3346 Місяць тому

    Liliana's Gryech makes an infinite amount of black mana with One With Nothing and Dark Ritual

  • @plaxy100
    @plaxy100 Місяць тому

    For Descent of the ancestors turn 1 play swamp, start opponents upkeep cast Dark Ritual get 3 black, cast Descent of the ancestors, if opponent doesn't have force of will he loses

  • @NateTmi
    @NateTmi Місяць тому

    it is fine with that wording. the saga happens with a bit more explanation needed for the first part of the saga. Then when it transforms you can leave it as a 2/2 or it may become a 2/1 with haste so it can attack the turn it transforms.

  • @OMGclueless
    @OMGclueless Місяць тому

    Angel of the Moon is definitely not fair. Resolute Reinforcements is in a tier 1 standard deck. Dragon Fodder and its like are often playable. This card gets you that but is also stapled to a 3/3 flying blocker that has the option of attacking if it helps close out the game and can be blinked for significant value.

    • @realitant
      @realitant Місяць тому

      Idk. It is straight up power crept raise the alarm, but that’s probably fine in 2024. I could definitely see this being printed in a commander product where the tokens are less impactful (at least from a beatdown perspective) and the lands may even matter more. More likely though, it would cost 3 and only search basics tapped

  • @TheMagicRat933
    @TheMagicRat933 Місяць тому +1

    38:02 Uhm, actually you can't pay mana to cast Hogaak ☝🤓

  • @bradensorensen966
    @bradensorensen966 Місяць тому

    X in Necrosy’s Diviner dodges Chalice of the Void!
    Oh, you said it!

  • @Brain-washed2
    @Brain-washed2 Місяць тому

    20:41
    wouldn't this kill those gods that are "not a creature if your devotion to [color] is less than x"

  • @chrismaples9392
    @chrismaples9392 Місяць тому

    Gatebreaker the opponent right after you Emrakul them.

  • @FelbloodStreaming
    @FelbloodStreaming Місяць тому

    29:00 Most of the Elementals I can think o doing this with already have Flash or Evoke. MAybe I just don't know elementals very well, though.

  • @SnoretimeTcg
    @SnoretimeTcg Місяць тому

    You can have multiple salt cave in play in constructed. You can't even draw out of it..

  • @milii113
    @milii113 Місяць тому +1

    Rock goes crazyy

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones Місяць тому

      Rock peats mana rock

  • @josephle5373
    @josephle5373 Місяць тому

    I just said to chatgpt it should create some cards and they are much more coherent imo. What llm is used for the videos? Maybe we should think about a change in techniques.

  • @tiger5869
    @tiger5869 Місяць тому

    I like how it took you 2 minutes to realize that Scarecrow Armara is a one card combo lol

  • @Saggy315
    @Saggy315 Місяць тому

    Land unquisition would work great with those 7/1 trample elementals, simply bounce the creature and recast instead of sacrificong it.

  • @kirbyandknife2333
    @kirbyandknife2333 Місяць тому

    1:10:20 FORD!!! IS THAT YOU???

  • @Arethusa01
    @Arethusa01 Місяць тому

    We went for A to *no word found

  • @RassaFortuna
    @RassaFortuna Місяць тому

    That foam is baffling.

  • @akeustis
    @akeustis Місяць тому

    20:16 Sunth in Jern of the Equillard is meh as a card but the name & art are based

  • @danhendricks5896
    @danhendricks5896 Місяць тому

    The kraken monk that has no name is legendary. How does having no name work with the legend rule?

  • @leurunner4764
    @leurunner4764 Місяць тому

    2:29 Silly frog. You're not Gura.

    • @Anaklusmos42
      @Anaklusmos42 Місяць тому

      The text box is so large, for just "A"
      And then there's a rock, with nothing

  • @TheJadeFist
    @TheJadeFist Місяць тому

    I kinda like the idea of a card that gives all your permanents Crew.

    • @cherry9787
      @cherry9787 Місяць тому

      Kind of a weird Animate Artifact

    • @TheJadeFist
      @TheJadeFist Місяць тому

      @@cherry9787 ya, except you can add in the clause for they gain a power and toughness based the creatures crewing it. Not only to just be a bit different, that way lands don't die should you wish to crew them for what ever bizarre reason.

  • @RoderickEtheria
    @RoderickEtheria Місяць тому

    44:12, you are a player. You may draw a card whenever you draw a card.
    53:32, you didn't read the whole card. Definitely not the part about rolling.

  • @Ant_B
    @Ant_B Місяць тому

    More AI cards!!!! Angel of the moon looks like a real card.

  • @Xerdoz
    @Xerdoz 24 дні тому

    Masquerading.

  • @XLR8Yeti24
    @XLR8Yeti24 Місяць тому

    Gatebreaker would work with Mindslaver! You control their life!(🐿️)!

  • @2019inuyasha
    @2019inuyasha Місяць тому

    I would play full house of A. Can even play it as an instant. Next i play the card that shuffles our hands and we each draw 7 from other players library, giving them complete access to play A...awesome card print it...

    • @2019inuyasha
      @2019inuyasha Місяць тому

      My deck would have some cleaver way to play A for cheap..

  • @kregdesu9530
    @kregdesu9530 12 днів тому

    Screaming it naturalized... God's. Only problem is that God's have indestuctible so wouldn't even work. A bestowed creature maybe?

  • @2019inuyasha
    @2019inuyasha Місяць тому

    Red kraken monk not having name dodges pithing needle...

  • @Señor-Donjusticia
    @Señor-Donjusticia Місяць тому

    What is it with AI and making overpowered instant-win rat cards?

  • @NateTmi
    @NateTmi Місяць тому

    Each opponent can attack each other player. As in each other player other then you. When they declare attackers u play this & they need to target any player other then u with the attack

  • @crowcoregames1785
    @crowcoregames1785 Місяць тому

    the little frog that is like :D lol
    26:38 funny works but hexproof on the bord means well weird nonsense hapens
    44:28 hey what do you know im a player i target myself i drew a card yeh il draw my deck now lol

  • @Zagryzaec
    @Zagryzaec Місяць тому

    With wing man like me that player will have no game at all.

  • @dracolientreri7302
    @dracolientreri7302 Місяць тому +1

    Cunning earth destroyed me. A

  • @danhendricks5896
    @danhendricks5896 Місяць тому

    Destroy target creature that isn't a creature.
    Does this kill the theros gods?

    • @goldenalt3166
      @goldenalt3166 Місяць тому

      I was thinking of the same. If it said "destroy target creature card that isn't a creature" it might, but then again all those gods are indestructable.

    • @HaibaneKuu
      @HaibaneKuu 20 днів тому

      No, because when they aren't creatures, they, well, aren't creatures. You can't target anything with that wording at all.

  • @diegovasquez840
    @diegovasquez840 26 днів тому

    19:18 -3

  • @NateTmi
    @NateTmi Місяць тому

    easy, target a player who has no cards in hand & well that is on the stak cast, target player draws a card & loses one life. Then they draw a card & discard it & loos one life. I think the cost might be 4 if u have the right spell that I am thinking of

  • @XLR8Yeti24
    @XLR8Yeti24 Місяць тому

    Touching the sound proof material? With that request, the show became a Onlyfans show!😮

  • @SushiElemental
    @SushiElemental Місяць тому

    A
    And also: I

  • @XLR8Yeti24
    @XLR8Yeti24 Місяць тому

    Scarecrows ain't humans!

  • @ayties5113
    @ayties5113 Місяць тому

    Play "District Forms" and Mycosynth Lattice. No if any opponent casts any permanent spell they die due to is sawn as a casted Artifact.

    • @a.velderrain8849
      @a.velderrain8849 Місяць тому

      That's not how Mycosynth Lattice works. Look at the rulings on Gatherer, only permanents become artifacts, spells on the stack are not artifacts.

  • @stennostenno1346
    @stennostenno1346 11 днів тому

    Fast

  • @tommyhansen7600
    @tommyhansen7600 Місяць тому

    Stream HIGHER quality in 2024,just because some have old phones it no reason

    • @NikachuMTGLive
      @NikachuMTGLive  Місяць тому

      I tried streaming in 1080p and it started lagging for like 30% of people live.

  • @smeagolalltheway
    @smeagolalltheway Місяць тому

    Opposition agent steps into the chat

  • @samvargas1651
    @samvargas1651 12 днів тому

    A