😁👍👍 I understand your point about striking a star/planet for an "incident" - "horizontal column comparison to mountains/edge of visible universe...-? But in the overall Aggregate ("assuming evenly distributed" universe mass) the concept/horizontal Column...is inclusive of those stars/planets... Just for clarity.. - The actual "space" of Space (low overall matter density) is very, VERY profound..👍👍 Excellent comparison/visualization aid! TY!
Honestly this just somehow brought back memories from when I was still a kid watching these videos. You're a treasure for humanity Cody, never stop showing us your knowledge.
Same, I kinda put Cody and Mythbusters in the camp that turned me into a stem minded kid. Even now as a boring video editor, I still experiment, explore and learn things just cuz knowledge is fun.
Any other large UA-camr would have animated those totes stacked... He asked us to use our imagination, that's totally reasonable! More relatable as well.
whenever I see a new Cody's Lab upload, I remember my fresh out of HS days. Physics undergrad dropout working in the bakery and showing up late on saturday because I stayed up until 11pm watching Beekeeping and random science vids on this very channel. That was almost a decade ago. glad this channel is still going.
Atmospheric Pressure is ~1 bar. 1 bar is ~1 kg/cm² 1 kg/cm² is 10 000 kg/m² 10 000 kg is 10 tons 10 tons is ~10 full IBC containers. It's nice when math is that easy.
i say this with absolute sincerity, i adore the use of "two and a bit" as a measurement. not all sciencey questions need exact answers, not everything needs to be precise. i know it's a small thing overall, but imprecise estimates have their place, and deserve respect when properly applied. been subbed for a long while, thanks for the consistent quality throughout 💜
@@MWB2Bleachfan These science/math communicator type of channels are better at it than most teachers, only because the visualizations seem to be much better. 2Blue1Brown, Tom Scott, Vihart, Periodic Videos, Numberphile... stuff like these channels should be used in classrooms honestly.
I "Think" he's in Utah. Pretty sparse living out there. For Instance, Daggett County, Utah is the least populated county in Utah, with a population of 1,029 as of 2023. Daggett County is located in the northeastern corner of Utah, bordered by Wyoming and Colorado. The county has a total area of 721 square miles (1,870 km2), of which 697 square miles (1,810 km2) is land and 24 square miles (62 km2) (3.3%) is water. It is the fourth-smallest county in Utah by area.
@@tbird81 Yes, I know. Here in Italy it is still pretty much unheard of to have _the closest neighbour_ be 10km away. In fact in continental Italy I'd be surprised if you can find a single point that is 10km away from a whole _village. Maybe_ you can find some in Sardegna.
Man I hadn’t seen a Cody’s lab video in years. But this was amazing. I felt like I was getting a lecture from my uncle who was a phd in physics and he would ramble on about stuff like this sometimes. R.I.P. Uncle Mel And thanks Cody
nice, also puts into perspective what those guys in the titan submersible were under. 3km+ of water above them, and normal air is only several meters worth of water.
Even more astonishing is that they bragged about being a "diverse" company and they couldn't figure out something some simple as the math involved at those depths. It isn't a new field of science. How could they not figure that out? Diversity.
@@KainYusanagi 0.4 psi per foot of depth. (I can't be bothered to convert that to metric because kPa is an ugly unit) Now multiply by 10,000 feet of depth.
A minor correction around 5:00: because the bottom surface of the fiber board is slightly lower, it actually experiences a slightly higher pressure, so there is a slight net force (upwards). If you work out how much this force is, it turns out to be buoyancy.
What's really fun is that with most cell phones you can measure atmospheric pressure carefully enough to see the difference across a couple of meters of vertical change. You can easily map what your phone shows to a finer scale and do the actual measurement to show that (deltaP)(Area) = buoyancy.
This effect also works on human bodies. The weight shown on your scales is LOW by a little bit - about 80-100 grams or 3-4 ounces to use very 'round' numbers.
That fact about the mass between you and your neighbor compared to you and the edge of our observable universe is absolutely mind blowing. Never stop making videos :,)
Also, I know it sounds dumb but why EXACTLY does it take so much more energy to say move something vertically into space versus diagonally through air. Is it purely just the work required to fight against the vector of gravity for such a long distance? The obvious example I mean is a rocket; as I’ve already been told before, that the biggest thing a rocket fights against is air resistance. But then how efficient would it be if something can be sent straight up if it’s only meeting air resistance equivalent to the mass of that much water… Maybe Cody should just start a literal rocket science series for us.
@@oreodog My quick stab is that the air resistance is such a problem because the rocket needs to exit quickly. Think of it like moving through water quickly vs. slowly; resistance increases drastically with speed. It needs to exit quickly because gravitational force is persistent (as opposed to air resistance which is in response to motion), therefore the longer it takes to overcome that force, the more energy will be required to overcome it. Since gravitational force decreases with distance/altitude (modeled by the inverse square law), the faster you get further, the less overall energy is required. Since that energy is stored in a massive amount of weight (rocket fuel & associated boosters), more required energy consumption means more weight, which means more required energy again to generate lift for that weight, as a sort of vicious cycle that eventually makes escape impossible below some particular speed/time/acceleration threshold.
@@oreodog drag is proportional to the _square_ of velocity and rockets have to move very fast to fight gravity. The resistance a rocket encounters isn't actually equivalent or proportional to the mass in those water tanks
This channel is one of the few remaining on youtube with raw passion for just sharing cool stuff. Cody, you're one of the golden gods of youtube for me, and I'm very grateful you keep doing what you do. You're awesome man, merry christmas and happy new year from Warsaw, Poland!
Thanks Cody! What struck me the most was how much little carbon there is on the earths surface. Plants seem to be an integral part of capturing it from the air and locking it into the soil. Then it can be used by other life forms! Mind blown!
Well yeah. Soil did not and could not exist without plants as their roots trap clay particles. Without plants, you would have only sand and rocks on land and rivers could not form.
Maybe that's why my cat follows me around so much: she's trying to ensure that, no matter which of Earth's square metres I occupy, there's always a cat in it :)
and there's an ant for every square millimetre on earth. oh and before someone asks "why isn't the whole world covered in ants?" 1. it is. 2. 3d space exists. the world is not a 2d plane.
This has the same energy as when I think about the fact that the moon and planets and stars are just objects out there. That's why you can see them, is because they're _right there._ I look at Jupiter through a telescope and think it looks pretty, and it's hard to really comprehend that the reason I can see it is because it's _right there._ Just like my neighbor's house, only a bit farther away, and unfathomably big. And the same is true of stars-I can point at Albireo and say "look how pretty that is" because they're _right there, right where I'm pointing._ And they're so far away that I'll have lived and died and been dead for hundreds of years before a photon bouncing off of my pointing finger ever reaches them, and they're so big and bright that I can still see them despite that. And it's crazy to think that those photons will have to go through more matter within 100 miles of me than the entire rest of their journey to Albireo combined
I understand completely. This thought leads me in so many different directions. Gravity and the laws of motion, and the history of collisions between objects, are all such that the Moon exists - a rock big enough to be its own world. A world which could collide with ours, but due to luck, hasn't so far. The moon is orbiting so close that we can see its surface features and the only thing fundamentally stopping us from travelling and staying there is not mathematics, physics, or chemistry, but economy and common sense. Our lives are so stable and serious, and we care about who's next to wear the big politician hat, and we have soap operas. However, all the time there's just a bloody giant rock spinning around us in a circle, and because of work and distractions, barely anyone stops and meditates about the implications for very long. It's the same vibe as looking at the sun briefly, and appreciating that the reason you can't look for longer is because you're literally looking at nuclear fission.
As I've posted elsewhere before- The greatest problem with closed ecologies is the inevitable amputation of the atmosphere. In the open on Earth, a square meter of good farmland extends at least 30 cm into the surface and has a mass close to a ton, with perhaps 10 to 50 kg of water available. But the air on top of it outweighs everything else at ten tons. Putting a dome generously ten meters above the soil leaves at most twelve *kilograms* of air, nowhere near enough to buffer the daily flows of water, water vapor, CO2, and oxygen that must flow in and out of the soil and plants. All the ills of ECLSS stem from this desperately limited air supply. For example, those ten cubic meters of air, at 400 ppm CO2, contain a whopping seven grams of CO2. The enclosed ecosystem is balanced on a knife edge. Any off-earth closed ecosystem will need a good buffer for oxygen, CO2, and nitrogen. All three gases must be able to be drawn from and returned to storage as the biosystems fluctuate in throughput due to seasonal and (on Mars) weather changes.
Cody, your explanation brought me a vivid imagining of the Earth inside a reaction vessel, undergoing hydrogen "distillation" with carbon as a catalyst. Very wonderful, thank you. Cheers to you in the dark time
When I was a kid who loved science living in the rural west I always imagined doing stuff like you're actually doing. Seeing things like you do actually happen scratches an itch I've had forever. You're a special critter, man! Thanks for doing what you do.
love your videos man, been watching em for years now you had part in shaping me, not to a great extend but a positive difference. I wish you best of luck on your endeavours, CH base looks promising too :)
I thought the same thing, although the caveat there is that you generally go diving in salt water (which is why he needed the extra 300L of water I guess)
Thanks for the holiday upload! The wonder of the natural world articulated thoughtfully and engagingly by way of some really mind blowing examples is always a treat on your channel. Your dedication to your craft(s) continues to inspire.
Hi, I really enjoyed that visual comparison. Your visibility up in the mointains is incredible too. I am surrounded by hills and forests and can hardly look further than 20 kilometers, more often closer to four. Also if you filmed this recently I really appreciate the amount of sun you get in mid winter, it's been a deplorable mess of thick clouds and rain here for weeks. Thanks for posting, cheers from gloomy mid-northern Germany
I envy the view you have from your base. 10 km or even more distance clearly seen from that point. Far away mountains, blue sky, it's simply beautiful. So grand and serene.
I imagine when most people would see this video, that would just scream "Nerd!!" But if it wasn't for people like Cody in the past, we would still be chiselling into the stone. It reminds me the videos when I first stumble upon this channel. Loved it!
I did not expect my mind blown by an upload from Cody today, yet here I am and all the better for it! Thank You for staying around and staying as fascinating and informative as always!
This is such a pure and entertaining channel, I love it. It makes me feel like a kid again, asking the simply interesting questions and really digging into the answers
Thank you for making this video. It paints a really cool view in a multitude of perspectives. I really appreciate you bringing out something akin to a child-like wonder in myself and so many of your other viewers.
Ur content is very fun to watch. I love what you have done with it and it has made me very happy over the years. I appreciate you and hope that you prosper and achieve ur goals.
It boggles my mind how Cody can get through this entire presentation in a mostly continuous take and without a script. Even memorized would be impressive. And to juggle the camera visuals at the same time.
Did you get a recent iPhone for filming? When you zoomed it changed the microphone and your voice got quiet. I saw a video from dankpods about the new iPhones and this is something he complained about. He also had a few tips on bad default settings that he changed.
This was alarmingly fascinating! It's good to know that if every tree were to spontaneously combust we wouldn't suffocate! I'd love to see you explore the environmental impact of it though!
yes - you can easily breathe the atmosphere if you burn all carbon, but you will still feel the greenhouse effect practically cooking the earth at the same time.
Man, I love your content, and I admire and respect you. I've actually taken your saying "the worst handwriting is better than the best memory" to heart. Doesnt seem like much, but you've helped make me more scientific, and encouraged a part of me to be....well, more inquisitive and theoretical. I doubt you will ever see this, and still less actually ask; but I do have some botanical knowledge, and I would gladly help if you have any botany based inquiries. :) Either way, I just want to say thank you Cody. For being a brilliant, down to earth, and compassionate example of a great scientist. ❤ 😊
A little followup to answer a common question: ua-cam.com/video/A3ujEZWEi3s/v-deo.htmlsi=hjGNMV6srhaeEbYA
😁👍👍
I understand your point about striking a star/planet for an "incident" - "horizontal column comparison to mountains/edge of visible universe...-? But in the overall Aggregate ("assuming evenly distributed" universe mass) the concept/horizontal Column...is inclusive of those stars/planets... Just for clarity..
- The actual "space" of Space (low overall matter density) is very, VERY profound..👍👍
Excellent comparison/visualization aid! TY!
Honestly this just somehow brought back memories from when I was still a kid watching these videos. You're a treasure for humanity Cody, never stop showing us your knowledge.
I missed these videos. Hopefully more comes in shorter time
Same, I kinda put Cody and Mythbusters in the camp that turned me into a stem minded kid. Even now as a boring video editor, I still experiment, explore and learn things just cuz knowledge is fun.
I hope this is sarcasm his videos are ass lmao
Yea Cody's awesome
yup cody made geology rock hah
>Air is kind of hard to visualize on account of it being transparent...
This is the kind of content that makes Cody such a treasure.
Amazing prose :)
Beautiful comment😊
Never dig straight down, you'd risk hitting lava
And never dig straight up as well. Might get suffocated by gravel
@@miladeskandari7or drown in an underwater cavern
Minecraft "wisdom"
@@miladeskandari7 Or find yourself suddenly submerged by the ocean.
@@Skorpychan For real indeed
No cuts, no edits, no bullshit - just pure entertainment and knowledge
Any other large UA-camr would have animated those totes stacked... He asked us to use our imagination, that's totally reasonable! More relatable as well.
Well there was the bit about the stars that I added.
@@petevenuti7355 And they would have put annoying music on top of it.
UmM WeLl AcTuAlLy, at 7:48 there was a cut lmao
. . . And a cat! ;)
whenever I see a new Cody's Lab upload, I remember my fresh out of HS days. Physics undergrad dropout working in the bakery and showing up late on saturday because I stayed up until 11pm watching Beekeeping and random science vids on this very channel. That was almost a decade ago. glad this channel is still going.
Yup, and google/youtube had his payments on hold, he recently got paid again and that's cool.
did you end up going back to school?
Didn’t Cody study geology?
@@Splarkszter ikr, he's like one of the foundational UA-camrs
And his videos are still just ass cool if not cooler!!
Can’t wait for part 2: “Whats Below Every Square Meter?”
Yes! I Thought the same!
my dear summer child, that will be mercury of course.
Atmospheric Pressure is ~1 bar.
1 bar is ~1 kg/cm²
1 kg/cm² is 10 000 kg/m²
10 000 kg is 10 tons
10 tons is ~10 full IBC containers.
It's nice when math is that easy.
If it's too easy, do it in US customary units 🙂
It is not the math that causes it. It is the SI system of units.
If you love the metric system.
Yeah, OP isn't claiming that "math [in general] is easy", they're saying that _"this_ math is easy _because SI was set up to make it easy"._
So that’s why my one co-worker is studying to become a meteorologist…
He *loves* bars 😂
i say this with absolute sincerity, i adore the use of "two and a bit" as a measurement. not all sciencey questions need exact answers, not everything needs to be precise. i know it's a small thing overall, but imprecise estimates have their place, and deserve respect when properly applied. been subbed for a long while, thanks for the consistent quality throughout 💜
A bit is totally a legit measurement imo. I was literally thinking this as he was saying it!
Two containers plus a single bit of information!
Fermi estimation is a thing that is used by scientists - not as a measure of exactness but as a measure of relative magnitude.
Cody is subtly pressuring us to get a perspective on matters
I love how over time the small channels are doing a better job of teaching than most schools
Well played. I’ll give you that one.
@@MWB2Bleachfan These science/math communicator type of channels are better at it than most teachers, only because the visualizations seem to be much better. 2Blue1Brown, Tom Scott, Vihart, Periodic Videos, Numberphile... stuff like these channels should be used in classrooms honestly.
@@Sauvenil They are, if there's time or the substitute dngaf
Cody is going to get demonetised for telling us about Carbon now lol, can't have us NOT stressing out about the imminent end of mankind now can we. 😆
Great video. Just 10 containers with water, a piece of board, a cat and a landscape. And a fascinating story!
As a European the most mindblowing part in all of this is that your neighbours are a whole 10km away.
They have rural areas in Europe.
I "Think" he's in Utah. Pretty sparse living out there. For Instance, Daggett County, Utah is the least populated county in Utah, with a population of 1,029 as of 2023. Daggett County is located in the northeastern corner of Utah, bordered by Wyoming and Colorado. The county has a total area of 721 square miles (1,870 km2), of which 697 square miles (1,810 km2) is land and 24 square miles (62 km2) (3.3%) is water. It is the fourth-smallest county in Utah by area.
@@tbird81 Yes, I know. Here in Italy it is still pretty much unheard of to have _the closest neighbour_ be 10km away.
In fact in continental Italy I'd be surprised if you can find a single point that is 10km away from a whole _village. Maybe_ you can find some in Sardegna.
As an Aussie, while most of us live urban or semi rural, some places the density of population is ..... almost a vacuum 😅
welcome to the notion of 'flyover' states
Man I hadn’t seen a Cody’s lab video in years. But this was amazing. I felt like I was getting a lecture from my uncle who was a phd in physics and he would ramble on about stuff like this sometimes.
R.I.P. Uncle Mel
And thanks Cody
nice, also puts into perspective what those guys in the titan submersible were under. 3km+ of water above them, and normal air is only several meters worth of water.
Yeah, the amount of pressure deep water puts on stuff is absolutely insane.
Even more astonishing is that they bragged about being a "diverse" company and they couldn't figure out something some simple as the math involved at those depths. It isn't a new field of science. How could they not figure that out? Diversity.
@@KainYusanagi 0.4 psi per foot of depth. (I can't be bothered to convert that to metric because kPa is an ugly unit) Now multiply by 10,000 feet of depth.
@@teebob21 Wouldn't it also be 1 tonne/m2 for every metre of depth? So at 3km depth it would be 3,000 tonnes.m2.
@@hermitoldguy6312 Metric doesn't simply use mass per area. A pascal is a newton per square meter, or 1 kg/m-s^2.
I love how excited Cody is to share this knowledge you can hear him smile throughout
@Cody…..I can hear you smile!!!! Love it!!
Exited? Where did he go?
A minor correction around 5:00: because the bottom surface of the fiber board is slightly lower, it actually experiences a slightly higher pressure, so there is a slight net force (upwards). If you work out how much this force is, it turns out to be buoyancy.
What's really fun is that with most cell phones you can measure atmospheric pressure carefully enough to see the difference across a couple of meters of vertical change. You can easily map what your phone shows to a finer scale and do the actual measurement to show that (deltaP)(Area) = buoyancy.
This effect also works on human bodies. The weight shown on your scales is LOW by a little bit - about 80-100 grams or 3-4 ounces to use very 'round' numbers.
Well Cody showed how to measure density of a very small objects based on this in one of his older vids
@@csoursI see what you did there😂
thats very cool
That fact about the mass between you and your neighbor compared to you and the edge of our observable universe is absolutely mind blowing. Never stop making videos :,)
Also, I know it sounds dumb but why EXACTLY does it take so much more energy to say move something vertically into space versus diagonally through air. Is it purely just the work required to fight against the vector of gravity for such a long distance?
The obvious example I mean is a rocket; as I’ve already been told before, that the biggest thing a rocket fights against is air resistance. But then how efficient would it be if something can be sent straight up if it’s only meeting air resistance equivalent to the mass of that much water…
Maybe Cody should just start a literal rocket science series for us.
@@oreodog My quick stab is that the air resistance is such a problem because the rocket needs to exit quickly. Think of it like moving through water quickly vs. slowly; resistance increases drastically with speed.
It needs to exit quickly because gravitational force is persistent (as opposed to air resistance which is in response to motion), therefore the longer it takes to overcome that force, the more energy will be required to overcome it. Since gravitational force decreases with distance/altitude (modeled by the inverse square law), the faster you get further, the less overall energy is required.
Since that energy is stored in a massive amount of weight (rocket fuel & associated boosters), more required energy consumption means more weight, which means more required energy again to generate lift for that weight, as a sort of vicious cycle that eventually makes escape impossible below some particular speed/time/acceleration threshold.
@@oreodog drag is proportional to the _square_ of velocity and rockets have to move very fast to fight gravity. The resistance a rocket encounters isn't actually equivalent or proportional to the mass in those water tanks
I really liked the Intro "Codys Lab" shadow
This channel is one of the few remaining on youtube with raw passion for just sharing cool stuff. Cody, you're one of the golden gods of youtube for me, and I'm very grateful you keep doing what you do. You're awesome man, merry christmas and happy new year from Warsaw, Poland!
Thanks Cody! What struck me the most was how much little carbon there is on the earths surface. Plants seem to be an integral part of capturing it from the air and locking it into the soil. Then it can be used by other life forms! Mind blown!
Read about cryptobiotic soils as well. Very interesting stuff.
Well yeah. Soil did not and could not exist without plants as their roots trap clay particles. Without plants, you would have only sand and rocks on land and rivers could not form.
So you're saying there's a cat for every square meter of Earth? Excellent. Thanks for the videos. Stay safe out there.
Maybe that's why my cat follows me around so much: she's trying to ensure that, no matter which of Earth's square metres I occupy, there's always a cat in it :)
Can you imagine trying to step around millions of litter boxes!
Are you trying to give me nightmares? Cats give me the creeps.
and there's an ant for every square millimetre on earth.
oh and before someone asks "why isn't the whole world covered in ants?"
1. it is.
2. 3d space exists. the world is not a 2d plane.
@@nobody8717 checkmate flat earthers
every time cody uploads.. it's like a brand new day, but in an enjoyable way. Thanks bro. and keep going, you look better that way :) happy xmas 😀
This has the same energy as when I think about the fact that the moon and planets and stars are just objects out there. That's why you can see them, is because they're _right there._ I look at Jupiter through a telescope and think it looks pretty, and it's hard to really comprehend that the reason I can see it is because it's _right there._ Just like my neighbor's house, only a bit farther away, and unfathomably big. And the same is true of stars-I can point at Albireo and say "look how pretty that is" because they're _right there, right where I'm pointing._ And they're so far away that I'll have lived and died and been dead for hundreds of years before a photon bouncing off of my pointing finger ever reaches them, and they're so big and bright that I can still see them despite that.
And it's crazy to think that those photons will have to go through more matter within 100 miles of me than the entire rest of their journey to Albireo combined
Jupiter is rather "a bit bigger, but unfathomably farther away" than your neighbor's house.
The distance difference dwarfs the size difference
I understand completely. This thought leads me in so many different directions. Gravity and the laws of motion, and the history of collisions between objects, are all such that the Moon exists - a rock big enough to be its own world. A world which could collide with ours, but due to luck, hasn't so far. The moon is orbiting so close that we can see its surface features and the only thing fundamentally stopping us from travelling and staying there is not mathematics, physics, or chemistry, but economy and common sense.
Our lives are so stable and serious, and we care about who's next to wear the big politician hat, and we have soap operas. However, all the time there's just a bloody giant rock spinning around us in a circle, and because of work and distractions, barely anyone stops and meditates about the implications for very long.
It's the same vibe as looking at the sun briefly, and appreciating that the reason you can't look for longer is because you're literally looking at nuclear fission.
As I've posted elsewhere before-
The greatest problem with closed ecologies is the inevitable amputation of the atmosphere. In the open on Earth, a square meter of good farmland extends at least 30 cm into the surface and has a mass close to a ton, with perhaps 10 to 50 kg of water available. But the air on top of it outweighs everything else at ten tons. Putting a dome generously ten meters above the soil leaves at most twelve *kilograms* of air, nowhere near enough to buffer the daily flows of water, water vapor, CO2, and oxygen that must flow in and out of the soil and plants. All the ills of ECLSS stem from this desperately limited air supply.
For example, those ten cubic meters of air, at 400 ppm CO2, contain a whopping seven grams of CO2. The enclosed ecosystem is balanced on a knife edge. Any off-earth closed ecosystem will need a good buffer for oxygen, CO2, and nitrogen. All three gases must be able to be drawn from and returned to storage as the biosystems fluctuate in throughput due to seasonal and (on Mars) weather changes.
13:25 The happiest cat in the world XD
Cat: I want to be a youtube star!
Also cat: never mind I'm shy
Just wanted to say I always enjoy your videos Cody. Today's Cody's Lab intro is really cool and I love the shadow art
Cody, your explanation brought me a vivid imagining of the Earth inside a reaction vessel, undergoing hydrogen "distillation" with carbon as a catalyst.
Very wonderful, thank you. Cheers to you in the dark time
So happy to see Cody back making videos!!!
How effortlessly a great educator can flow between concepts... Another awesome video!
When I was a kid who loved science living in the rural west I always imagined doing stuff like you're actually doing. Seeing things like you do actually happen scratches an itch I've had forever. You're a special critter, man! Thanks for doing what you do.
love your videos man, been watching em for years now you had part in shaping me, not to a great extend but a positive difference.
I wish you best of luck on your endeavours, CH base looks promising too :)
A nice visual. When diving the pressure increase about 1 atmosphere every 10m (which is another way of saying the same thing of course)
I thought the same thing, although the caveat there is that you generally go diving in salt water (which is why he needed the extra 300L of water I guess)
It may not be clear to most people, but Cody did good job explaining this subject with some basic equipments in the nature
Merry Xmas Cody ❤
Thanks for the holiday upload! The wonder of the natural world articulated thoughtfully and engagingly by way of some really mind blowing examples is always a treat on your channel. Your dedication to your craft(s) continues to inspire.
Brilliant video Cody. Happy Holidays 🙂
Sometimes I just point upwards and try to visualize what’s above me.
1 square meowter
Hi, I really enjoyed that visual comparison. Your visibility up in the mointains is incredible too. I am surrounded by hills and forests and can hardly look further than 20 kilometers, more often closer to four. Also if you filmed this recently I really appreciate the amount of sun you get in mid winter, it's been a deplorable mess of thick clouds and rain here for weeks. Thanks for posting, cheers from gloomy mid-northern Germany
I envy the view you have from your base. 10 km or even more distance clearly seen from that point. Far away mountains, blue sky, it's simply beautiful. So grand and serene.
Almost no other science youtubers make me think about these things the way you do Cody, love your work!
I imagine when most people would see this video, that would just scream "Nerd!!" But if it wasn't for people like Cody in the past, we would still be chiselling into the stone.
It reminds me the videos when I first stumble upon this channel. Loved it!
We wouldn't even be chiseling in stone
This was a classic Cody video. I love the new stuff too and this just gave me some nostalgia. Great video cody
I love this video format because it feels like I'm having this thought process "live", with you. Really interesting.
That intro was really cool!
This is great, it's like one of those videos they show to students to help put things in perspective, in fact maybe it should be used like that
I did not expect my mind blown by an upload from Cody today, yet here I am and all the better for it!
Thank You for staying around and staying as fascinating and informative as always!
This is such a pure and entertaining channel, I love it. It makes me feel like a kid again, asking the simply interesting questions and really digging into the answers
If you're a scuba diver you should know that a 10 m column of water exerts 1 bar of pressure.
I feel like you using metrics is so underrated. It makes all this talk so easy to calculate, understand and visualize.
Very, very cool visualization. Thank you for continuing to post videos!
Thanks for a thought-provoking video, Cody. Happy holidays!
Perspective, it's important! Very interesting! Thanks!
Don't you remember? Chunks are 16x16 😂
Robo Cody's server cannot load that many chunks at once... Just Telling you I think he needs an upgrade.
Thank you for making this video. It paints a really cool view in a multitude of perspectives. I really appreciate you bringing out something akin to a child-like wonder in myself and so many of your other viewers.
This was truly eye opening! Thank you for sharing Cody. 🙌👍
Like the new intro Cody!
First, so nice cody love when you upload. Keep it up! 🙌🏻
Happy holidays, cody🎉
Love every time you post. Keep doing what you’re doing.
This video has such a nice vibe, like an old youtube video of a guy just showing off something neat he found
You’re a national treasure, Cody.
Ur content is very fun to watch. I love what you have done with it and it has made me very happy over the years. I appreciate you and hope that you prosper and achieve ur goals.
It boggles my mind how Cody can get through this entire presentation in a mostly continuous take and without a script. Even memorized would be impressive. And to juggle the camera visuals at the same time.
never stop, please, you are the OG of YT... seriously no one is left making content that does not suck compared to you! i wish grant was still around!
Thanks for telling us this! I had no idea that so much of our oxygen is paired to hydrogen rather than carbon.
Happy holidays Cody. Your channel is one of a very few that makes science enjoyable to the layman like myself. Thank you.
Great visualization! Always enjoy the genuine enthusiasm Cody has for asking questions then sharing what he finds out.
Did you get a recent iPhone for filming? When you zoomed it changed the microphone and your voice got quiet. I saw a video from dankpods about the new iPhones and this is something he complained about. He also had a few tips on bad default settings that he changed.
*C A T* square law
🐈💨
My mind blown once again, Cody!! This visual and the logic you present are what I would have benefitted from greatly as a child! Merry Christmas!
Happy new year cody !
Great job Jodie, I admire your efforts for science. We need more of this. Kids need more of this.
...Jodie?
This was alarmingly fascinating! It's good to know that if every tree were to spontaneously combust we wouldn't suffocate! I'd love to see you explore the environmental impact of it though!
Very interesting stuff Cody!! A very relaxing video. Keep up your awesome work!
Hi Cody! Happy holidays!
Notification squad!
Gracias, Cody! Felices fiestas!
That is a fantastic visualisation Cody. Merry Xmas and a happy new year to you and yours
yes - you can easily breathe the atmosphere if you burn all carbon, but you will still feel the greenhouse effect practically cooking the earth at the same time.
Ahh, superiority of metric system
Very impressive physical demonstration! It made it very easy to visualize your point. Great video!
always good to see another upload cody
My answer was.. a cat.
Until u said beside the cat. Damn it😒
For once I wanted to look smarter 😖
Smarter Every Day
bababooey
LMFAO
always makes me so stoked to see a new codyslab video
Cody, dropping straight up science facts onto UA-cam... ah, the old days are returning.
First
Grade?
Well done. 🥇
@@hermitoldguy6312 is he your boyfriend?
@@xploration1437 No, why, do you fancy him?
@@hermitoldguy6312 you gave an idiot a medal for typing “first”. That’s pretty gAy.
Your mom
That mountain view perspective was very eye-opening. Thanks for sharing that!
I'm grateful you're posting more often lately. Thanks Cody
Enjoyed this presentation. God bless you and your family, friends and viewers. Happy new years Cody 😊
So reducing your carbon footprint is a load of bs.
dont mix up breathable atmosphere with the greenhouse effect. yes you can breath it, but you would still be cooked alive by thermal radiation.
This is just fantastic, you explain things so well as you always do Merry Christmas, and thanks for all the knowledge
I enjoyed!
Good talk, I like that sort of talks. The ones jumping all around and showing all relationships and conclusions which usually are hidden.
Awesome facts explained simply...Great video Cody!!!
Loved this kind of video. Thanks for sharing.
Man, I love your content, and I admire and respect you. I've actually taken your saying "the worst handwriting is better than the best memory" to heart. Doesnt seem like much, but you've helped make me more scientific, and encouraged a part of me to be....well, more inquisitive and theoretical. I doubt you will ever see this, and still less actually ask; but I do have some botanical knowledge, and I would gladly help if you have any botany based inquiries. :)
Either way, I just want to say thank you Cody. For being a brilliant, down to earth, and compassionate example of a great scientist. ❤ 😊
That was so interesting! Thank you for taking the time to visualize all of this data! Absolutely incredible!!!
On par with Feynman in blowing my mind. Happy Holidays!