Magnus Destroys 3100 GM with 3850 Performance

Magnus Carlsen is a Norwegian chess grandmaster who is the former five-time World Chess Champion, reigning four-time World Rapid Chess Champion, and reigning six-time World Blitz Chess Champion. Arguably the greatest Chess player of all time, Carlsen has held the No. 1 position in the FIDE world chess rankings since 1 July 2011 and trails only Garry Kasparov in time spent as the highest-rated player in the world. His peak rating of 2882 is the highest in history. He also holds the record for the longest unbeaten streak at the elite level in classical chess. Magnus Destroys 3100 GM with 3850 Performance
More videos on my channel - clck.ru/YaQZR

[@hookwill]

“He’s just getting mated, that is his problem” 💀

[@davidsantiago7808]

Just don't lose, skill issue

[@JuicersSuck]

That's just one of his problems :0)

[@1999_reborn]

"Were simply better at chess"

[@louptrjack7354]

"Happens to the best of us"

[@hirepikepower36]

mans is wild for that ong lol

[@Emperor01_]

Bro's literally human stockfish 💀💀

[@o941f]

stockfish's literally AI magnus💀💀

[@GilMonteverde]

3850 performance? I doubt anyone on the planet can replicate this.

[@Elamado97]

Stockfish :👁️

[@martijndekker1134]

Firouzja?

[@Jimmy19382]

​@@martijndekker1134he's not better than magnus he even said in an interview that he was just lucky magnus was really tilted

[@yaboityrease6557]

Fabiano did this for a whole tournament 😂

[@patrickmadden6340]

Aparantly Hans has had 4 100% perfect games lol 😂

[@ushar1562]

4:38 just 1 mistake that isn't moving the Nb7, Carlsen perfectly played the game

[@vd5564]

Did he say dude slept with his "brother-in-law's wife"? Doesn't that mean he slept with his sister? Lol

[@johntobin3960]

Yes haha or wife’s brother’s wife

[@pieradgr548]

Game played February 2023. By today's evaluation he played with 92.6% accuracy or 3300 rating.

[@MaximumBloop]

Source?

[@LaPtaVerdad]

Relaxed semi retired magnus is even scarier than try hard magnus to be honest

[@davidsantiago7808]

Kramnick would like a word

[@Swatotastic]

"happens to the best of us"💀

[@romm1el]

xd

[@usman4236]

how can i get the pgn for this game?

[@Imlitteralysiam]

1:10 ☠️

[@trocycling1204]

"how exactly is he defending against e8?" He's not!

[@mranderson3441]

It really looked too passive from Magnus, but after seeing he had 3800 performance, I guess I am too noob to understand a high level of chess. 😊

[@blakesmg]

I LOVE YOU MAGNUS

[@catac83]

Magnus was just reading chat comments while playing this GM ;) jesus christ ;)) I dunno what to make of it.. I think he is just waiting for this GM to blunder.. opponent played really good and he was up in material by having a pair of bishops.. but he didn t anticipate rook to E8 in time

[@mou1444]

3:45 fart??????

[@rajeshmaydev]

fried intestine attack

[@cautiouse]

idk how you heard that but thanks for pointing it out

[@amark350]

4:09 and he fires off round number two

[@amark350]

4:30 and a third time

[@6Monto]

man hes hungry thats why he ate that GM

[@PianoValley]

One question, How an engine, estimated to be around 3400-3600, can know your calculating at 3850? Is there a fixed pattern for this?

[@berka8587]

I think its because the brilliant move can kead to many different positions and its a but if a longer sequence until a real winning position or checkmate. But after the moves are made, its able to calculate since there are less moves to count in for. I have no clue, this is just my logic

[@vitorpeixeira6194]

Honestly, this performance doesn't serve as a parameter. I myself have had some (recent) games where I had a performance of 700/800 and 1750/2250 on the same day.Furthermore, performance seems quite relative to your rating, so if your rating is 1000 +/- you will hardly have a performance of 2000+, even if, effectively, you have a level of 2000

[@notyannz]

@@vitorpeixeira6194 Just seems like you played one match much better than the other

[@kennethhicks2113]

Mr. Carlson... you CAN"T be pair up or even!
Nice tourny win this week : )

[@stevesullivan1202]

The greatest of all time

[@eagleeyes5583]

scam, it can't be 3800 rating

[@azazelorb6374]

Okay nice performance but do we just gonna ignore 1:09???

[@elimasonofficial]

Ikr??? Like wtf?

[@assasinator4579]

Never let bro cook again 💀

[@Fact0ryy]

Why didnt black take rook a2, isnt that just a free piece?

[@Fact0ryy]

Nvm

[@Mezonator656]

I am like the dumbest person at 950 😢

[@A1xarT]

Chickbait bullshit

[@evropej]

777

[@hakkcangumus4101]

damn he fart 3:44

[@fbinjamil2]

when magnus pushes the pawn at 4:16, why doesn't the opponent grab the free rook?

[@justaero7852]

I am no expert, im only around 800-1k elo
But I think his opponent doesn't kill magnus's rook is because if his opponent kills magnus's rook, magnus will kill opponent's knight with his bishop which then targets the queen, and the opponent can't take the bishop because then magnus can kill the rook with his queen which is mate, so the opponent will move his queen to protect it from magnus's bishop, then magnus can push the passed pawn even forward threatening promotion, so to avoid all this his opponent just moved his rook so magnus's queen doesn't threat checkmate as now the rook also protects the back line (this is just my guess might be wrong)

[@taneridle6299]

@@justaero7852 This is how us 1k elo calculate instead of using chess notation

[@johnbrandt9698]

@@justaero7852really cool that you saw that at your elo, big props man thats high level vision

[@donotcodeit]

​@johnbrandt9698 wow, no, it isn't. Obvious things

[@HTGH89]

​@@taneridle6299 You're right, as a 1643 elo myself, I'm too lazy to locate this and that and memorize it even 😂, glad I'm not the only one lol.

[@the-lenny-dood7502]

Brb let try 4,000 elo performance real quick 🥸