Kelly Rutherford Discusses International Custody Case

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
  • Devastated "Gossip Girl" actress sheds light on the battle over her children.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 115

  • @devourerofbabies
    @devourerofbabies 10 років тому +24

    Her life is like a plot from Gossip Girl.

  • @April25Org
    @April25Org 10 років тому +7

    The Gossip Girl actress was previously married to Venezuelan banker Carlos Tarajano in June 2001. Shortly after their marriage he was diagnosed with a heart condition. Kelly Rutherford filed for divorce in January 2002. The wedding was featured shortly thereafter in the February 2002 issue of InStyle magazine. Tarajano was upset that the magazine was still publishing the story when the marriage was over and notified the magazine to relay this message. The magazine claimed that Kelly assured them that the two were still together. The beautiful wedding piece along with glossy pictures was published. Tarajano died in 2004.
    Kelly Rutherford is a piece of work. In her case the courts got it right. We should be applauding these particular judges for a well reasoned ruling that enable both parents to be in their children's lives, regardless if that upsets Kelly Rutherford and her supporters. She is a not a victim only of court system, but a victim of Karma.

  • @jarrettscott886
    @jarrettscott886 9 років тому +14

    She said she doesn't know much about the father @ 4:57. Than why have 2 children with a man you don't know anything about?

    • @Bogna1
      @Bogna1 8 років тому +2

      +Jarrett Scott She just wanted sperm donor as she was already 37 and wanted a child desperately (but she should rather go to sperm bank than use a guy), on the other hand, he didn't act responsible too as he got pregnant woman that he knew just a few weeks (or even few day) - plus they conceived their second child while they her problems in their marriage (to save their marriage) then 2 months later she filed for divorce.

    • @jop23ify
      @jop23ify 3 роки тому +1

      Kelly was vindictive.. She wanted sole custody so that she could milk the dude on child support. Now as that did not work, she reported her ex to the state dept accusing him of illegal deals and this got his visa revoked and that meant he could not come back. Now what she did not think about was that, a shared custody forces her to let the kids move to France. This is what happens when u think you are being a smart ass

    • @informationyes
      @informationyes Рік тому

      @@jop23ify And he before any of this literally applied for ful custody before the daughter was even born! for no reason but you ignore that and dont call him vindictive do you

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому +7

    "Kelly stated on the record that Daniel was dealing drugs and weapons in South America, which under the Victory Act is considered terrorism," a source tells PEOPLE, adding it's all untrue. "Just the accusation is enough to revoke his visa." Papers show Rutherford is now required to make "good faith efforts" to facilitate his attempts to get his residence right reinstated. (carefully read the last sentence) People magazine.. She caused him to loss his visa.

  • @queenlandingsb.4359
    @queenlandingsb.4359 9 років тому +11

    She basically conspired to have him deported though. She made allegations that were false to his person plus got him deported. She'snow literally paying for something she caused herself lol . I usually first instinct side with the mothers but she tried to play him dirty and it backfired. I guess she wasn't actually counting on he having just as much right to be with his children as she did.

    • @FacheChanteDeux
      @FacheChanteDeux 9 років тому +1

      You and many people say this blindly. Personally I come from a family full of attorneys and I have some legal education. From what I have been told by expert opinion (I asked out of curiosity) Kelly had no power to deport him. Anything is just hearsay until assertions have been investigated and deemed legitimate grounds for deportation. Quite frankly you and everybody else should not accept an article in People magazine as the truth. Whatever transpired between Kelly & her ex-husband the children should remain in their place of citizenship with fair visitation of their father. Incidentally, Monaco is a very corrupt off shore banking mafioso pricipality (separate from France) so I would not by into their court rulings too easily.

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 8 років тому +1

      +FacheChanteDeux
      Kelly lie about her ex on 9/11 which got his visa revoked and the children are part German and are German citizens and have dual citizenship

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому +3

    He has family money, but he also coined the phrase gmail.com. But money really has nothing to do with custody. The issue is what she did, and her actions that lead to the judge's ruling. Their no evidence that he deals drugs and arms. Ms. Rutherford made that statement which lead to his visa being revoked. That's why the judge among other reasons ruled in his favor. The point is whether you are the father or mother, no side should try and keep the other away. The courts frown on this behavior.

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому +2

    Here are the facts. Rutherford left Giersch and did not inform him when she gave birth to their second child. She then accused him of violence, and drug dealing, accusations that were not proven,but nevertheless, Giersch had his visa revoked and could not enter the United States with their two children. On Aug 29, 2012, Giersch was awarded custody of their two children in France where he continues to live. The judge had no other choice....he can't enter the us, because she had his visa revoked.

  • @marjokat
    @marjokat 8 років тому +6

    Why the kids is not with the mother??? That the question is never ask. She must have done something wrong for a judge to take away kids from their mom. She is using the media looking like the victim.

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 8 років тому +1

      +Marc Champagne
      Kelly lie and disobey court orders numerous times and to add she try to destroy her children relationship with their father and the kidnapping stunt she pull in August was enough prove to give the father full custody.

  • @April25Org
    @April25Org 10 років тому +9

    Please do your homework. The allegations which got her ex husband's visa revoked were found to be false and came from Kelly Rutherford's camp. She knows all about "his immigration issues" they came from her. The judge made a sensible ruling. She has 50 50 custody. More than most in contentious divorces.

  • @elisamarodrigueslucena181
    @elisamarodrigueslucena181 11 років тому +2

    Oh my God, I can't believe it happened to her. God bless you. I'll pray 4 you.

  • @BeatlesFanSonia
    @BeatlesFanSonia 12 років тому +2

    If you ever go to court during a divorce, you know that everything hinges on if the judge likes you or not! Taking the children out of the country is very dangerous. He could take the kids anywhere in the wold and she may never see them again. Someone should help her! That judge should be chastised for that horrible ruling! I wonder if the judge has any children?

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому +2

    He's the father, he's the provider, and he makes 10 times what she makes check it out. In the courts both parents are seen as equals. The courts don’t look kindly on a parent who doesn't promote a relationship with the other parent. Furthermore, if she didn't play a part in getting his visa revoked (she claimed he was selling arms). She would have come out with the reason it was taken away. The court heard all facts and that’s why a female American judge ruled against her.celebrity manipulator..

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому +2

    the judge says Kelly continually failed to put Daniel's name on their daughter's birth certificate ... despite being asked several times by the court.

  • @Richbund
    @Richbund 8 років тому +3

    Kelly's statements are disingenuous; She is not decisive with her answers and has to think about what she's going to say... She says she doesn't know her husband that well?!? She says she was pregnant when this all started and didn't expect all this (battle)... She started it! She should have fired her attorney for not preparing her for a divorce she filed. She's the one who ignored all court rulings. She's the one who would not return the children after a 5 week visit. The kids live in the most wonderful place in Europe, Monaco. It's hard to see the kids are not in a very good place. If Kelly had been "Peaceful" and amicable, and respectful of the court rulings, none of this would be happening. My opinion of Kelly Rutherford is that she makes a lot of bad choices for herself and her children. I think the kids are better off with their father in Europe. I am not passing judgment on Kelly or her Ex-husband as I do not know the details or dynamics of why they divorced. I am stating my opinion based on all that I have read about it.

    • @Richbund
      @Richbund 8 років тому

      Correction, Daniel filed for divorce...

  • @Sybellaish
    @Sybellaish 6 років тому +3

    I'm of the opinion that if the father has custody of the children, there must be a perfectly good reason. Said by a female......

  • @AllisonZahigian
    @AllisonZahigian 12 років тому +4

    Ok well we have some of the same best friends and I know for a fact that things said about her and supposed actions she has done are lies. Just like any other celebrity. I have lots of friends in the media and i'd say 95% of what is said about them is true. She is an easy target to make lies around because people believe that celebrities constantly do horrible things.

  • @Nyehehe995
    @Nyehehe995 12 років тому +1

    Let's get this straight.
    The reason his visa was revoked was because she *accused* (that word is important) him of drug use. An accusation like that alone is enough to revoke his visa.
    If he is not allowed on US soil, and she is allowed on french soil, then the only fair thing is for the kids to stay in france.
    Why should the mother get priority over the father?

  • @sevilletulips
    @sevilletulips 10 років тому +5

    I don't watch Gossip Girls and I don't know much about Kelly Rutherford or her ex-husband. But if the court ruling is 50/50 why is this even an issue? Is it because the kids are not in the US and it inconveniences her? What if it's the other way around and the kids were in her care? It would have troubled the dad then, right? So, it really doesn't matter who has the kids, it's never easy when two parents are from two different worlds and split up and one decides to return (or gets kicked out) to his/her home country. You can keep fighting but at the end of the day, the kids would have to end up with one parent and the other would have to make a sacrifice and travel - unless you want to ruin your kids' lives and schooling by having them 6 months in your country and 6 months in your ex's (and if the court would allow it!).
    Also, what is she trying to accomplish repeating "I don't know much about him"? Stop that already, Kelly. It only makes you look ignorant and stupid!

    • @margaridasantos6350
      @margaridasantos6350 4 роки тому +1

      But do you know what she is/was feeling? Imagine not being able to see your kids everyday! You probably just watched this video talking about this subject. Go see others 🤦🏽‍♀️

  • @Shan-ShanH
    @Shan-ShanH 6 років тому +3

    I’m sorry, but no job would be my priority. Move. Get another job. Wait tables. Her attitude about that says a lot about her.

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому

      Do you her ex-offer to buy a house for her and a car and help her find a job so she be with her children but no Kelly loves the limelight more than her own children.

  • @ivetteskii
    @ivetteskii 12 років тому +2

    She doesn't know much about him??? yet they had two kids??? ummm.... wtf woman, that's pretty dumb!! and now this ruling against you... really!, doesn't that tell u something????

  • @BillyElsmore
    @BillyElsmore 11 років тому +1

    There was obviously a reason for him being banned from the US and that shouldn't be her problem.

  • @jenlynn804
    @jenlynn804 7 років тому +1

    Absolutely heart breaking! I can't even begin to imagine the pain she feels. This is definitely a tricky case & I get that. But even in 4 court ordered screenings, she was proven to be a good, loving and caring mother for her babies. Also they were born in America, then they should stay in America!! He should get 8 weeks in the summer.

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому +1

      Kelly did everything in her power to destroy her children relationship with their father and not only did Kelly and her lawyer lied in court to get her husband Visa to revoke and Kelly disobey every court orders and she bad mouth her children father in front of her son to the point he had anxiety attacks and that one refused to hand over the children to their father and pull the same stunt three years ago which cause her to lose primary custody her children and her children have dual citizenship

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому

      Well Kelly screw up royalty

  • @thatsyoutubistic
    @thatsyoutubistic 12 років тому +1

    oh she looks distraught, poor girl with all this & it being public! All the best

  • @moonyjoon
    @moonyjoon 5 років тому +1

    The real question is when Kelly fell in love with her husband and got married in US, why didn’t she file for her husband’s American citizenship? I’m surprised why no body is mentioning it!!! There is something FISHY going on in Kelly’s life.

  • @BrainwashCraps
    @BrainwashCraps 12 років тому +2

    Keep Hope Kelly ! :)

  • @Arsmortis7
    @Arsmortis7 12 років тому +2

    As it turns out he was granted 50/50 custody because she tried to alienate him from ever seeing his children. She did not tell him when his daughter was born, he found out on facebook. She refused to put his name on her birth certificate as well. The reason he was deported was because she accused him of dealing drugs and weapons in South Africa, and then called ICE on him.
    I have yet to find an article that is about him. All I know is that he is a business man from Germany.

  • @rudy032190
    @rudy032190 11 років тому +1

    how horrible for her... or any mother to lose their children for that matter... but you have to wonder, who would have kids with somebody they "don't know"???

  • @koky3040
    @koky3040 12 років тому +1

    i really feel bad for kelly, god help u

  • @Sinquin0202
    @Sinquin0202 11 років тому +1

    I am glad he won the custody, plus France or Europe in general is a lot better than USA. That way the children have escaped ever being stupid,

  • @AllisonZahigian
    @AllisonZahigian 12 років тому +1

    He gets his money from his mother. She works for what she has and there is nothing wrong w/ a working parent. There is proven evidence that he did deal arms & drugs. Also, b/c she makes less than him that means he should get them? B/c a mom making at least half a million a year isnt enough to live on? You're saying shes a celebrity manipulator but you're acting like a greedy snob when it comes to money. & they are US citizens not legally allowed to come into the country. It's fucked up.

  • @persephone6896
    @persephone6896 10 років тому +1

    From what I understood she puts her career first. I understand she cares about her children but I would maybe put my career o. Hold for a while until I can recover my children.

  • @flala2261
    @flala2261 9 років тому +4

    A mother is *the* most important person in a child's life. I really hope that her children will stay with her in America. Her slighted ex-husband is obviously a control freak and is *not* doing best by his biological children, he is *Only* doing what is best for *himself*!

    • @KCxo25
      @KCxo25 9 років тому +4

      fla la You clearly don't know what she has done. She's done everything to cut the relationship between the father and the children. She didn't want him in the picture at all. Read the court statement of decisions. She's a lying, vindictive woman who has brought every conflict upon herself.
      harris-ginsberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Statement-of-Decision.pdf

    • @karolinarsaxon831
      @karolinarsaxon831 5 років тому

      Kray x

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому +1

      Wrong there ,Kelly did everything in her power to destroy her children relationship with their father and not only did Kelly and her lawyer lied in court to get her husband Visa to revoke and Kelly disobey every court orders and she bad mouth her children father in front of her son to the point he had anxiety attacks and that one refused to hand over the children to their father and pull the same stunt three years ago which cause her to lose primary custody her children and her children have dual citizenship

  • @karenferguson987
    @karenferguson987 12 років тому +2

    So THIS is the "beautiful blonde TV star from gossip girls" who my friends who work at Versailles saw this spring! Given that she's the sole support of her kids, and the tradition of having the mother's care be given priority, it seems a sham that the courts are claiming to give her "50-50" rights while she's got to work to pay off all the deadbeat dad's bills. Sounds exactly like the book/movie on the French running off with Ameican kids in "The Divorce" with Kate Hudson.

  • @chinyereonyenwe9107
    @chinyereonyenwe9107 11 місяців тому

    its been years now, the kids are probably adults now. have they returned to the US?

  • @TheBarryPretorius
    @TheBarryPretorius 12 років тому

    This is really terrible! Kelly is visibly stressed and rather distraught. In South Africa, such a ruling is highly unlikely. Especially when it comes to visa fraud. One can only hope that justice will prevail. The ideal will always be co-parenting, but regardless of this, a child needs to be with their mother, especially in their formative years.

  • @BeatlesFanSonia
    @BeatlesFanSonia 12 років тому

    BEAUDET, TERESA Judge Stanley Mosk Courthouse 2B (213) 893-0510....This is the judge that did this to an American MOM!

  • @amylynnhunt55
    @amylynnhunt55 9 років тому +1

    +Children's Rights Florida + David Inguanzo
    Please stop spamming UA-cam with this copy paste crud. You are clearly promoting a personal agenda that has nothing to do with this family or these children. One of my best friends has been fighting for custody of his kids for 5 years. I RAN the FB support group for fathers (and hello, I am the WOMAN in the photo by my name). I know sometimes the father is the best place for a child. What I do know and YOU and your cohorts do not seem to know is that this is not a place to further your cause. You do not need to malign a lady about whom you know nothing.
    Do not tell people who ask honest questions to "Do your homework", homework being work one is assigned at school or work, and they finish it at (do I need to finish this?) home. We who are just trying to understand and encourage are doing what we can, not promoting any agenda. You are blinded by yours. Justice should be blind, right? Not the people demanding it.

  • @rutab5094
    @rutab5094 9 років тому +3

    If she cared she would go t france.. And where is rights for fathers? When fathers keep children they look like monsters. I don't see it as fair that the father won't be able to see the children and everyone on the mothers's side just because she is a mother and a woman. So these are equal rights? Also if it was any ordinary person no one even wou;d consider signing the petition . She can just go to france and see her children but she obviously cares more about publicity than them.

    • @TaTa-ex2tr
      @TaTa-ex2tr 9 років тому

      Do you know what this man did that he isn't allowed to go to the U.S.? He's a bad father! The kids shouldn't stay with that person a day.

    • @rutab5094
      @rutab5094 9 років тому

      Natascha Nein so she is a good mother? instead of going to her kids she sits on her as in america and uses it to get publicity... if she loved her kids she would have already been in france..

    • @rutab5094
      @rutab5094 9 років тому

      Maya Jackson how is he even abusive? everyone always just takes the mothers side..

    • @digitalcurrents
      @digitalcurrents 9 років тому

      Maya Jackson Her bankruptcy came after paying 1.5 million in legal fees.

    • @mag3225
      @mag3225 9 років тому

      +digitalcurrents and flying back and forth internationally. That's not cheap

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому

    karenferguson again you are ignoring the facts. She had the guy's visa revoke. She isn't being completely honest. Furthermore, the lady has a history that shows she lack character.

  • @lori4444
    @lori4444 9 років тому +1

    I don't understand why she just doesn't go to France?

    • @TheHanna2108
      @TheHanna2108 9 років тому +3

      Laura x she is american citizen, as the kids, and her job is also in USA. Why shall she move to France? Why is Giersch, as a german citizen living in Monaco?? I guess this has other reasons than the weather! Why cant he get a VISA in the US? Probably same reason!

    • @mag3225
      @mag3225 9 років тому

      She can't. She's bankrupt now from legal fees and international travel to see her children.

    • @postersandstuff
      @postersandstuff 6 років тому

      Heard she even had to borrow money from her mother

  • @Shan-ShanH
    @Shan-ShanH 6 років тому

    Why doesn’t she move to the area they live? If that’s the choice you need to make to be near them. That’s what you do. You move.

  • @cool_cat007smoove3
    @cool_cat007smoove3 6 років тому

    Why in the hell would you have a kid with a person, that you don't know??? This is when you don't know someone inside and out.....

  • @Amarillo2012
    @Amarillo2012 5 років тому

    So sad 😥

  • @annaknowsu
    @annaknowsu 11 років тому

    And like a lot of women you tear other women down for no other reason than they are female. I don't know what kind of people these two parents are and NEITHER DO YOU. But whatever her claims were against him the USA wouldn't permanently ban someone if they didn't find some truth in it. I think whatever their faults they're both probably good parents, but it was wrong to force the kids to move to a new country/culture/school/EVERYTHING when they had lived in the US all their lives.

  • @johnnestor6998
    @johnnestor6998 12 років тому

    Sorry Allison you seem to be making a lot of statements about who you know and what happen, but no facts to back it up. In people magazine they reference her needing to assist him in getting his visa reinstated, one can only concluded that she played a hand in getting revoked. If this were not true she could hold them libel. Furthermore, she is seeking the spot light on this issue. The woman has money, she's the mother, she had primary custody, and still lost. She had to really screw up.

  • @junojas108
    @junojas108 11 років тому

    If he lost his visa he must have been doing something to be barred??? I lived in the US for over 20 years with permanent residence, didn't do anything wrong & my status was taken from me. Please stop being so intolerant. And to top it we are talking about 2 children here.

  • @Arsmortis7
    @Arsmortis7 12 років тому

    I don't know the man I was married to/had two kids with.

  • @purplenurps
    @purplenurps 11 років тому +1

    Yes he got barred because she accused of things he didn't do

  • @itscaitlinxo
    @itscaitlinxo 9 років тому +1

    I don't see why the kids couldn't have stayed in the US and Kelly could've sent them to France to see their father over summer and any other holidays, whenever there was the chance. Yes I understand the judge was making it 50/50 but Kelly still brings the kids back to the US although they reside in France. Daniel can't come to the US but he could have the kids back in France with him. There's no reason for the kids to have to move to France especially when Daniel is German not French. This whole case infuriates me.

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 9 років тому +1

      Caitlin Allan Blame Kelly for lying to judge

    • @queenlandingsb.4359
      @queenlandingsb.4359 9 років тому +1

      She knew about his immigration situation when she married him and decided to maliciously snitch on him when they were getting divorce and disputing the custody of THEIR children. On top of that she made up false accusations that he was involved in some drug business to make his case worse. I guess because back then she was in a big tv show and her status she mightve thought she was gonna get away with it and have the judges believe it and not investigate it until it was proven false. SHE LIED. She conspired about him. Still got 50/50 consent custody but because of the deportation she herself caused she's now paying for it. Karma is indeed a bitch. Be a better person, don't act maliciously and this stuff won't happen to you. Oh well...

    • @Whitneypyant
      @Whitneypyant 9 років тому +4

      She didn't want her kids to have any relationship with their family. She the reason why the kids father in France. She falsified documents that got him deported. Also she didn't bother to tell him after she had her second kid. The judge her to put his last name on birth certificate but she refused.

  • @smokingsections
    @smokingsections 11 років тому

    Your words beg to differ.

  • @johnfriedman1524
    @johnfriedman1524 12 років тому

    I hope this is the start of a new standard that gives father's joint or primary custody in most cases. Fathers have better education, jobs and money than mothers thus they are better parents for their Sons.

  • @expo1706
    @expo1706 9 років тому +1

    her ex looks signif. younger than her. he is. although she is a pretty lady I think. why the bad blood between the 2 (Kelly r. and her ex)??? whose the bad seed here? 1 or both? Why France if he's German?????

    • @TheHanna2108
      @TheHanna2108 9 років тому

      ***** the best place to avoid the tax department!!!! Also the best place for people with not a whilte suit!

    • @amylynnhunt55
      @amylynnhunt55 9 років тому

      +ellamae Really?! This is a huge, sad issue and your takeaway is "She looks older than he does". That is beyond irrelevant!

    • @amylynnhunt55
      @amylynnhunt55 9 років тому

      +Christiane Lange "with not a white suit"?? PLEASE tell me you who are making such odd statements are just having trouble with the English language because it is not your first language.
      Somerset Maughm called Monaco "A sunny place for shady people", but that was long ago, way back before Prince Rainier and Princess Grace made the Principality a wonderful, richly cultural place. And yep, no income tax BECAUSE Monaco runs on funds from the Casino - and by the way, the Princely family is not allowed to enter the casino. This has been a "family business" for 700 years, Monaco is not a joke or a scuzzy place. They are at least safe there.

    • @Bogna1
      @Bogna1 8 років тому +1

      +ellamae He is 6 years younger than her, but looks much younger anyway.

  • @simaussie
    @simaussie 12 років тому

    this is horriable, she looks distraught and is sooo wrong. cant believe how anyone could think its right to trap the children in a country and put the mother in this position when shes done nothing wrong

  • @Arsmortis7
    @Arsmortis7 12 років тому

    Yea he got a divorce from his american wife....

  • @smokingsections
    @smokingsections 11 років тому

    Yeah and you know this how? There is absolutely zero proof she did so not to mention you can't just go around accusing people of things they're innocent of and get away with it. Obviously there's something fishy going on with him that provided a basis for his visa being revoked. And, honestly, him being barred from the U.S. works unfavorably for Kelly so it would be absolutely ridiculous for her to have taken such action. The ruling was outrageous considering the kids' whole lives are here.

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому

      Kelly did everything in her power to destroy her children relationship with their father and not only did Kelly and her lawyer lied in court to get her husband Visa to revoke and Kelly disobey every court orders and she bad mouth her children father in front of her son to the point he had anxiety attacks and that one refused to hand over the children to their father and pull the same stunt three years ago which cause her to lose primary custody her children and her children have dual citizenship
      Read the court documents

  • @rajatsingh8341
    @rajatsingh8341 3 роки тому

    Beautiful Liar

  • @purplenurps
    @purplenurps 11 років тому

    zero percent

  • @intrinsicallyme8404
    @intrinsicallyme8404 6 років тому

    Is the judge drunk?

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому

      Nope, Kelly did everything in her power to destroy her children relationship with their father and not only did Kelly and her lawyer lied in court to get her husband Visa to revoke and Kelly disobey every court orders and she bad mouth her children father in front of her son to the point he had anxiety attacks and that one refused to hand over the children to their father and pull the same stunt three years ago which cause her to lose primary custody her children and her children have dual citizenship

  • @abrahamanand5739
    @abrahamanand5739 6 років тому +1

    Hahaha so happy that she lost

  • @K1370
    @K1370 10 років тому +1

    Who is he? I have no doubt he was dealing with drugs. Prove me wrong lol. He is a millionaire. Sorry kelly :( maybe you shouldn't have married a guy you barely knew ... 50/50 problems on both sides

    • @LaraCroftEyes1
      @LaraCroftEyes1 5 років тому

      No he wasn't dealing in drug and Kelly is the main reason she lost custody of her children