Third Battle of Kharkov: How The Germans Set a Deadly Trap for Russian Troops

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 бер 2022
  • Join The Channel for more perks : / @factbytes
    As the year 1943 progressed, a series of attacks centred around Stalingrad in southern Russia, resulted in some of the most intense fighting on the Eastern Front during WWII.
    The once-invincible German Wehrmacht was in disarray, having been forced back across a 175-mile stretch of Russian front by the Red Army.
    Near their headquarters on the Don River, a two-pronged Russian army threatened to surround and annihilate a German battlegroup, much larger than the one lost at Stalingrad.
    The commander of Army Group South, Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, found himself facing this mess.
    Despite Hitler's direct orders to hold the city, Kharkov was abandoned by German forces, and the city was recaptured by the Red Army on 16
    Von Manstein knew, he had to have the flexibility to maneuver and yield ground when necessary.
    He intended to isolate and destroy the Soviet spearheads before launching a campaign to retake Kharkov. Once this was accomplished, Army Group South would work with Army Group Center to the north, in retaking Kursk.
    Here's how the events unfolded...
    Music Credits: All This Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
    Copyright fair use notice
    All media used in this video is used for the purpose of education under the terms of fair use.
    All footage and images used belong to their copyright holders.
    #Kharkov #Manstein #FactBytes

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @charles5895
    @charles5895 2 роки тому +1025

    The fact that the Germans could still give the Soviets a bloody nose even after their disastrous defeat in Stalingrad is just mind blowing.

    • @cyrosubod2317
      @cyrosubod2317 2 роки тому +206

      Thats why they are based and finest fighting force in history

    • @grievetan
      @grievetan 2 роки тому +54

      Russians won only with outnumbering Germans

    • @firstduckofwellington6889
      @firstduckofwellington6889 2 роки тому +32

      They still had semi-fresh troops available

    • @ahahuehafook4207
      @ahahuehafook4207 2 роки тому +26

      I mean the soviets in that area were worn out in that area and overextended. They were still fuckin up allied armies hungarians italian ect

    • @rebelblade7159
      @rebelblade7159 2 роки тому +110

      @@grievetan Not really. The Russians had the numerical advantage and their tactics made the most use of them effectively. In some instances, the Russians were much better fighters than the Western allies if you read the accounts of Wehrmacht soldiers who fought them like Otto Carius. Otherwise, it would have been another scenario like the Middle East where the Israeli armed forces stopped much larger Arab armies who sucked at coordination and properly using their numbers.
      By the way, the greatest "dumb brute force human wave attack" of the war was D-Day.

  • @0Turbox
    @0Turbox Рік тому +68

    Modern war theories: you need a 3:1 advantage for a successful attack.
    Manstein: let's try it with 1:8.

    • @andrerothweiler9191
      @andrerothweiler9191 Рік тому +7

      If you are able to destroy logistics, you need even less. Ukranians showed the world how to do it

    • @sirpatriarch8122
      @sirpatriarch8122 3 місяці тому +4

      ​@@andrerothweiler9191The Ukranians just got enircled and has decided to scoot from their fort at Avdiivka 😅

    • @IceKnight678
      @IceKnight678 3 місяці тому +2

      @@andrerothweiler9191The germans had shitty logistics at the time

    • @avenaoat
      @avenaoat 9 днів тому

      The soviet had only about 2:1 and the Germans used hiwi-s so the German had only 1.7: 1! However the Tigers, and the new PC IV + Sturmgesütz were better tanks.

  • @norbertblackrain2379
    @norbertblackrain2379 2 роки тому +279

    Nearly exactly 79 years later there is another battle for Kharkov. The world is crazy!

    • @olavtryggvason1194
      @olavtryggvason1194 2 роки тому +5

      Yes and now it's the Ukrainians who better should prepare a deadly trap for the Russian forces.

    • @destroyerarmor2846
      @destroyerarmor2846 2 роки тому +3

      @@olavtryggvason1194 nah, USA is turning Ukraine into European Afghanistan

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 2 роки тому +10

      Lol, ez victory for Russia

    • @denisfutac9676
      @denisfutac9676 2 роки тому +2

      @@eliasziad7864 lololololololololol , you gonna need alot of Russian body bags , comrade...

    • @Gallagherfreak100
      @Gallagherfreak100 2 роки тому +2

      @@eliasziad7864 when the war criminal putin swings high from the gallows, you won't feel so smug.

  • @ThangTran-bj4we
    @ThangTran-bj4we 2 роки тому +57

    8:1 manpower disadvantage... but still kick ass.

    • @cybertronian2005
      @cybertronian2005 Рік тому

      though when you consider the Soviet troops were at the long end of their logistical tether, and many were weakened and understrength having participated in the battles around and following Stalingrad, and that the II SS Panzer Corps were fresh troops...

    • @jan8742
      @jan8742 3 місяці тому

      @@cybertronian2005also incompetent NCO corps made up of political appointees because it was more important to be loyal than to be experienced, something that is still true for the Russian Military some 80 years later

  • @paoloviti6156
    @paoloviti6156 2 роки тому +497

    Von Manstein was possibly one of the best German general of the war but it must be said that he had the best troops, Panzerdivisions and commanders they did an incredible feat and inflicting terrible losses to the Russians. Excellent video and I liked very much and just subscribed 👍👍

    • @randersen2171
      @randersen2171 2 роки тому +15

      have you watched Tic review the sources, The russian daily reports (force nr etc) only newly released, show that their units in kharkow where severly depleated after the offensive, with devisions being brigades etc. bringing the total numbers down to parity or sleightly outnumberd germans, with operational initiative a standard 3-1 was probably achived along every point of contact :)

    • @shanealan2168
      @shanealan2168 2 роки тому +15

      @@randersen2171 while there may be some truth to that you have to be careful with tic, he has a pretty obvious bias towards the soviets

    • @randersen2171
      @randersen2171 2 роки тому +3

      @@shanealan2168 i belive he has the same amount of bias, an honest historian would show if he was writing based on the german sourced (given he belived the german had no reason to lie) :) Tik is just a counter point, and the truth is in between, altough once you buy a narrative like he has, you become biased.

    • @Lehr-km5be
      @Lehr-km5be 2 роки тому +11

      @@shanealan2168 That is simply not true. Time and time again he debunked the myths that glorified both german and russian things alike. Seeing how he pretty much only uses legitimate quotes and reliable sources to prove his points it becomes quite obvious that he is not biased toward any side. The germans army and engineering is just much more often to made like the best army that had ever existed so there is the most debunking to be made here.

    • @shanealan2168
      @shanealan2168 2 роки тому +20

      @@Lehr-km5be I've been watching tic a long time, and in my opinion he has a clear if not egregious bias towards the soviet union. If you look at how far the germans got in ww2 constantly starving for resources against a coalition of the 3 greatest powers on earth, you have to give some respect to the german army and engineering.

  • @jebbroham1776
    @jebbroham1776 2 роки тому +294

    My great uncle was part of this battle as a panzergrenadier in 2nd SS Panzer div Das Reich, and his war diary is chocked full of heavy fighting for the city against what he described as "fighting for the gates of Hell". The resistance they encountered was fierce, but the panzer IV's they had supporting them really did a kickass job at destroying enemy strong points with HE, which the 2nd SS panzer carried plenty of as his diary shows. They were one of the few fully equipped divisions at that time during the counter offensive and they made good on their resources to push out the Soviets.

    • @toadfaceass
      @toadfaceass 2 роки тому +53

      Must be nice having a heroes blood a part of yours.

    • @alexbowman7582
      @alexbowman7582 2 роки тому +7

      There’s a recent UA-cam video on why the Americans soldiers preferred the Sherman’s 75mm HE cannon to the more anti tank 76mm due to the 75’s support of troops.

    • @TzunSu
      @TzunSu 2 роки тому +20

      @@toadfaceass If you think the 2nd SS were heroes you're a nazi.

    • @ra-ge
      @ra-ge 2 роки тому +57

      @@TzunSu They are soldiers,it has nothing to do with politics and yes they are heros.

    • @TzunSu
      @TzunSu 2 роки тому +20

      @@ra-ge Of course it has to do with politics. This specific outfit committed numerous mass murders and war crimes. If you think they are heroes, is there anyone who's ever carried a gun who's not in your mind?

  • @GrislyAtoms12
    @GrislyAtoms12 2 роки тому +98

    Hoth was such a great general that they named a whole planet after him.

    • @tylerhiggins3522
      @tylerhiggins3522 2 роки тому +8

      I catch a decent amount of WWII factoids (and weaponry) in Star Wars, Karellian freighter, Kessel run, etc.

    • @williampaz2092
      @williampaz2092 2 роки тому +3

      😂🤣

    • @RangaTurk
      @RangaTurk 3 місяці тому

      But he could not convince the higher-ups to give them back the 16th Motorised Division back to Army Group Don which belonged to his formation in the first place and for Army Group A elements north of Grozny to fall back to Elista to take their place. From a tactical perspective, I think the 17th Panzer Division arrived too late for the drive from Generalovskii to Lagovski. But when Little Saturn happened they might not have had to quit the relief salient completely and cancel Winter Storm, and even if they got to Krep and Zety by having the 16th Motorised Division move up towards Stalingrad alongside Group Panwitz what then? They still have to fend off the Soviet 64th and 57th Armies and wait for Paulus to break out whilst fending off frontal attacks from remnants of 2nd Guards and everything else. Plus if a tenuous connection was made the question is would they stay in the city with Strecker's Corp worn down to regiment and battalion strength?

    • @wernerdegraaf704
      @wernerdegraaf704 2 місяці тому +2

      😄

    • @GrislyAtoms12
      @GrislyAtoms12 Місяць тому +1

      @@RangaTurk This comment is way too serious to be a reply to my comment. It would be better to make it a stand-alone comment instead of a reply.

  • @theodorebennett7938
    @theodorebennett7938 2 роки тому +93

    I am no wheraboo, but I can't help but be impressed by the fighting abilities and resourcefulness of the German fighting man in ww2.

    • @Trust-me-I-am-a-dentist
      @Trust-me-I-am-a-dentist 2 роки тому

      20 Million Russians were starved to death by the Communist regime between the first and second world war. This was a part of Stalin's 'purification' of the Union.

    • @Trust-me-I-am-a-dentist
      @Trust-me-I-am-a-dentist 2 роки тому

      Russians were just as bad... so you can root for the Germans if you like. By the way UA-cam censorship is just astounding. I can't even say you can root for the Germans LoL.

    • @AchseBerlinTokio
      @AchseBerlinTokio 2 роки тому +4

      What is a wheraboo?! Are you 10 years old? Where you have these childish Kindergarten words from?

    • @iffatwaris7425
      @iffatwaris7425 2 роки тому +3

      @@AchseBerlinTokio wehraboo means that you support the Nazis, or the Wehrmacht specifically just because you find them cool aesthetically, like how red army fanboys are called "tankies." It's not a kindergarden word and it is a common phrase used when discussing about the Wehrmacht.

    • @AchseBerlinTokio
      @AchseBerlinTokio 2 роки тому

      @@iffatwaris7425 i thought the Pro russian is the sovietaboo and the US one a yankaboo? Are they Not? or a comwealthaboo for the brits? Frogaboo for the french or baguettaboo? Which childish idiot startet that shit?! Dont Tell me its from an online game then its 100% Kindergarten

  • @lychan2366
    @lychan2366 2 роки тому +138

    Erich von Manstein, who was the brainchild behind invading France through the Ardennes in 1940, sealed his place among great generals with his strategic counter-offensive surrounding the third battle of Kharkov. He was the only German Field Marshal who earned the respect of Soviet Field Marshal Zhukov by the end of WWII. It came as no surprise that he was chosen to head Germany's defence force in the initial post-war period.

    • @karstenseterbakken3617
      @karstenseterbakken3617 2 роки тому +11

      He wasnt chosen, he was actually forced to do, as many German veterans where.

    • @lychan2366
      @lychan2366 2 роки тому +10

      @@karstenseterbakken3617 Whether he was forced or chosen to lead the German defence force in the initial post-WWII period, wasn't the main point of my previous post.
      If you've missed the forest for the trees, the main point was that he was recognized for his strategic brilliance.

    • @richardscanlan3167
      @richardscanlan3167 2 роки тому +10

      the only respected German? sure buddy,Heinrici and Model would like a word.

    • @karstenseterbakken3617
      @karstenseterbakken3617 2 роки тому +4

      @@lychan2366 These people would never reckon the new republic of germany which where created after the war. He was forced to be a part of that new pro allied army in western BRD. He was one of many which where too forced on both sides of the wall which splitted germany apart to be in these new created defence forces. It wasnt because they respected them, it was to have a good eye on these battle hardened folks for very good reasons.

    • @lychan2366
      @lychan2366 2 роки тому +1

      @@richardscanlan3167 Tell it to Zhukov; not me.

  • @carlh3745
    @carlh3745 2 роки тому +160

    Just wanna say this rn, this was not germanys last victory on the eastern front. This was one of the last major victories the wehrmacht would have had. The Germans would still have minor victories as the war dragged on.

    • @travisgodbold7070
      @travisgodbold7070 2 роки тому +17

      Kharkov wasn't a Wehrmacht win, it was Waffen SS.

    • @Aryan-nv9kd
      @Aryan-nv9kd 2 роки тому +16

      Unfortunately, the cost of these "minor victories" would lead to the Soviets getting enraged and being pushed against the wall. And when you do that to a major power, you see vast civilian causalities. We hear reports about the Red Army brutally murdering, raping and killing entire German villages on their march to Berlin, but people forget that Russia suffered the same at the hands of the Germans when they invaded, and the numbers were three times than what the Russian did.
      In a war, if we are not careful about focusing on achieving the said targets and reducing collateral damage as much as possible, you will potentially be facing an armed relative of every person that you have killed by "accident". By the end of it all, Germans were literally running like rats trying to surrender to the Western Forces and escape the brutal torture that was waiting for them if they were caught by the Red Army.
      While the Western allies also committed atrocities of their own, they were known to be at least less brutal than what the Russians would do since the Germans had burned more than half of their country in the invasion which was also considered a betrayal by Stalin personally after he had signed various non-aggression treaties with Hitler.

    • @joangratzer2101
      @joangratzer2101 2 роки тому +1

      JAN. 1945 BUDAPEST (OPERATION SUDWIND - SOUTHWIND) 1ST SS AND 12TH SS AGAINST THE RUSSIANS OUTSIDE THE CITY IN 9 DAYS OF CONTINUOUS COMBAT THEY WIPED OUT 7 SOVIET RIFLE DIVISIONS AND 1 MOTORIZED BRIGADE.
      MICHAEL REYNOLDS "MEN OF STEEL"

    • @floydvaughn836
      @floydvaughn836 2 роки тому

      No retreat is a victory, unless you've got a whole lot of hurt to retreat to. And the Germans didn't. Face it, by not settling on a single objective that would put Stalin out of business (Moscow) the Germans were doomed to fail.

    • @SJ-xb7lg
      @SJ-xb7lg 2 роки тому

      @@Aryan-nv9kd LMAO what a load of horseshit. The wehmarcht never raped and killed civilians get your little head out of your ass.

  • @LOUNGELIQ
    @LOUNGELIQ 2 роки тому +131

    Timing is a perfect for uploading this, just when the fifth battle for Kharkiv is taking place.

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 2 роки тому +16

      Russian victory

    • @yaxsuo
      @yaxsuo 2 роки тому +11

      @@eliasziad7864 cool but when did we ask?

    • @humptydumpty3345
      @humptydumpty3345 2 роки тому +9

      @@eliasziad7864 not before their Cold War equipment and apcs with rotting tires get blown up by st. Javelin and his friends

    • @matthewhalstead8817
      @matthewhalstead8817 2 роки тому +1

      I thought the one happening now was the 4th?

    • @NhatHuyNg
      @NhatHuyNg 2 роки тому +4

      @@eliasziad7864 where?

  • @PitFriend1
    @PitFriend1 2 роки тому +189

    The logs you see on modern tanks, particularly Soviet/Russian ones, aren’t for protection. They’re for unditching the vehicle if it gets bogged down. The crew attaches the tank to the tracks on one end of the tank and when it moves the log is pulled under the vehicle to give it a lot of traction. This lets the tank pull itself out of soft ground and not have to get a tow.

    • @MALITH666
      @MALITH666 2 роки тому +7

      There is a quote from Generation Kill, "the army gets logistics, Marines make do" - when reporter asks why they use the KY lube for guns instead of proper ones.

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 2 роки тому +6

      Correct, basically the logs are useless against AP incoming shots as well demonstrated during the war with somewhat better results hanging tracks around...

    • @johncox2865
      @johncox2865 2 роки тому

      I’ve done that with red, 3 hole bricks on my dad’s 3/4 ton truck. Works very well!

    • @JoeOvercoat
      @JoeOvercoat 2 роки тому

      Same as the logs on the first tanks: they are on the roof so they can be rolled in front of the tank for sticky traverses.

    • @g3koot100
      @g3koot100 2 роки тому

      That's true

  • @murksdoc
    @murksdoc 2 роки тому +50

    "Ausf" is short for "Ausführung", meaning: "Version" or "Mark".

  • @mdmahboobhasan1470
    @mdmahboobhasan1470 2 роки тому +26

    Erich Von Mastyne was really an extraordinary genius General in the history of the world.

  • @ansc6472
    @ansc6472 2 роки тому +24

    Manstein should have been overall commander Eastern Front

    • @chadgaston8615
      @chadgaston8615 2 роки тому

      He still would have turned Ukrainians against them.

  • @MrPositive150
    @MrPositive150 2 роки тому +39

    Von Manstein was a genius

  • @uwebartsch4585
    @uwebartsch4585 2 роки тому +39

    manstein was brilliant

  • @andrewlerdard-dickson5201
    @andrewlerdard-dickson5201 2 роки тому +58

    Also the three SS Panzer Division's each had one SS heavy Panzer company at this stage of the war.
    The 1st SS 4th heavy company of Tiger's.....later re-numbered the 13th by May 1943.
    The 2nd SS 8th heavy company and the 3rd SS 9th heavy company of Tiger's were all involved in this battle of Kharkov.

    • @AndyP998
      @AndyP998 2 роки тому +5

      They forgot Stugs aswell. Even though they were labeled to be tank destroyers instead of tanks, they were getting quite numerous at start of 43.

    • @jagdpanther2224
      @jagdpanther2224 2 роки тому +1

      If those Tiger tanks arrived Stalingrad four months earlier, the human history has changed!

    • @AndyP998
      @AndyP998 2 роки тому

      @@jagdpanther2224 Tiger tanks and tanks generally dont help much in city battles. Ranges are generally smaller and Tigers excelled hitting enemy over 1km away and there wasnt enough of them. Onlything that would have helped if Romanian divisions at flanks had more AT weapons and troops

    • @bobbytreetop1701
      @bobbytreetop1701 3 місяці тому

      @@jagdpanther2224but they never .

  • @user-ms1ml5mt6s
    @user-ms1ml5mt6s 9 місяців тому +3

    Still the German give the Russian a blooded nose but still got kicked out of Russia

  • @kriserauw5970
    @kriserauw5970 2 роки тому +21

    8 to 1 ratio and still winning that’s what I call fighting spirit.

    • @user-gd9bi2hg5m
      @user-gd9bi2hg5m 2 роки тому

      это просто вранье вот и все

    • @lazr9672
      @lazr9672 2 роки тому +1

      @@user-gd9bi2hg5m how do you know?

    • @mustafajsiraj8877
      @mustafajsiraj8877 2 роки тому +5

      @@lazr9672 it hurts his bolshevik feelings

    • @Tom--Ace
      @Tom--Ace 3 місяці тому

      Lol don't try and censor me you asshat
      Manstein is a liar

    • @devinfraserashpole4753
      @devinfraserashpole4753 2 місяці тому

      @@mustafajsiraj8877 The Bolsheviks are gone.

  • @CorneliuZeleaCodreanu9
    @CorneliuZeleaCodreanu9 2 роки тому +8

    Subscribed within 20 seconds. I can recognize a good history channel when i see one

  • @anthonycruciani939
    @anthonycruciani939 9 місяців тому +6

    One would think Hitler would have learned from this experience that giving his most talented commanders like Von Manstein freedom to act flexibly could still yield tremendous results even after Stalingrad.

    • @ill_bred_demon9059
      @ill_bred_demon9059 10 днів тому

      You'd think that, but thank God he didn't

    • @anthonycruciani939
      @anthonycruciani939 10 днів тому

      @@ill_bred_demon9059 Well there is no God so let's not waste time with that.

  • @crayzydimes3041
    @crayzydimes3041 2 роки тому +41

    8 to 1 german disantvantage,and they stil won the battle,whoa...

  • @Theearthtraveler
    @Theearthtraveler Рік тому +1

    Great video!!!

  • @karomiooo
    @karomiooo 2 роки тому +52

    5th battle of kharkov is gonna be a thing i guess

    • @TheChuckfuc
      @TheChuckfuc 2 роки тому +5

      I guess so

    • @brendonbre8745
      @brendonbre8745 2 роки тому +10

      It already is, they are fighting for kharkiv now

    • @kniespel6243
      @kniespel6243 2 роки тому +2

      And the russians will be defeated this time by inferior army . Ukrainian army.

    • @angelonunez8555
      @angelonunez8555 2 роки тому +2

      The Soviets/Russians were 1-3 in the first four battles. Let us hope that their record falls to 1-4.

    • @Bynk333
      @Bynk333 2 роки тому

      @@kniespel6243 I dont thing, ukrainians have zero chance to win this....

  • @clydeblair9622
    @clydeblair9622 2 роки тому +51

    What a mind boggling waste war is.

    • @lordgarion514
      @lordgarion514 2 роки тому +13

      The mind boggling part is that the tech we learned from WW2, has already saved more lives than was lost during the war.

  • @theforgottenheroes9264
    @theforgottenheroes9264 2 роки тому +19

    The Battle of Bautzen was the last German victory against the Red Army in April 1945.

    • @leonpastis4663
      @leonpastis4663 3 місяці тому +1

      That was a local skirmish my friend, some days before the end of the war.

  • @wisecontragio172
    @wisecontragio172 2 роки тому +3

    nice footage, hadn t seen most of it

  • @theforgottenheroes9264
    @theforgottenheroes9264 2 роки тому +50

    September 1, 1939 the wehrmacht entered poland. France and great britain declare war on Germany. 15 days later the USSR annexed more than a third of polish territory. The allies did not decide to declare war on the USSR. What had been intolerable from Hitler had been tolerated from the Soviets! the allies feared consolidating stalin's alliance with the third reich. From september 1939 the allies had only one idea : not to rush the ussr, to initiate a reconciliation with stalin despite his aggression against their polish allies. Stalin was able to multiply diktats, put an end to the independence of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, wrest Bessarabia from the Romanians. Only one thing mattered : making it possible for the Russians to change sides. In less than two years, it was done. The Yugoslav volte face, the claims declared by molotov during his visit to berlin in november 1940 and which demanded neither more nor less than complete control of the balkans, the military preparations of the soviets during the spring of 1941 had left no doubt to hitler on the ambitions of the USSR. The Germans, sensing the stakes had been cast, only had to take the lead. It was under these Circumstances that the battle to the death between the Third Reich and the USSR began on June 22, 1941.

    • @JoeOvercoat
      @JoeOvercoat 2 роки тому

      After all, the critical thing to England was that England keep her Empire when all was said & done.

    • @purliewilson8192
      @purliewilson8192 2 роки тому +3

      Your point being what, exactly?
      When you say “in less than two years, it was done”, you seem to gloss over the fact that “it was done” by Stalin’s ally Hitler, & that Stalin chose to ignore the accurate intelligence he was given by the UK (& indeed by Richard Sorge) which made clear what was about to happen.

    • @logon235
      @logon235 2 роки тому +2

      The Soviets were caught unprepared. Sure, Stalin was seeking buffers from invasion, but he was more focused inwards that outwards. Hitler had ambitions Eastward, he even wrote about it and the need for lebensraum for the Aryan race. Hitler's invasion was not a response to a threat but his own ambitions.

    • @elviadarkgrape2859
      @elviadarkgrape2859 2 роки тому +11

      @@logon235 Bullshit. Hitlers Invasion was a preemtive strike against Stalins Bolshevik Conquest of Europe. He had to shoot first. Stalin was expanding in Baltic States, Finnland, Romania and he intented to attack Europe. Hitler just shoot first. Stalin even broke non-agression pact with Japan and stabbed the japenese in the back by invading manchuria.

    • @logon235
      @logon235 2 роки тому +1

      @@elviadarkgrape2859 you're exhibiting the same fear that the British had which brought the USSR to come to terms with a non aggression pact with the Nazis. Stalin was focused on his own security and his aim was to create a defensive buffer. That is why he wanted half of Poland and a strip of Finland. If he wanted to expand, he would have taken the whole of Finland. His actions was more defensive so he can concentrate on consolidation. Later, much later, he could have focused on expansion, as per demanded by the Communist ideology, but not at that time.
      Has the Western Allies been more pragmatic, they could have had both an alliance with Poland and the USSR against Germany which would have dissuaded Hitler from invading. Hitler would not have dared to engage the sizable and veteran Polish army if he didn't have the USSR invading from the other side.
      Hitler shot first with Barbarrosa, perhaps a small part of it is to strike first, but no, it was well planned and intended from the start and part of his grand plan of creating "Lebensraum" for the Aryan race.
      While both powers have intentions of expansion dictated by their ideologies, the Nazis were the ones acting on it with intent of conquest.

  • @manningjackson2723
    @manningjackson2723 5 місяців тому +3

    Excellent footage!! Thank you mate!! Love your videos, keep up the great work and Merry Christmas to you my friend 👍🇦🇺👍

    • @FactBytes
      @FactBytes  5 місяців тому

      Thanks, you too!

  • @zacharydoser8536
    @zacharydoser8536 3 місяці тому

    Very informative video. Very well put together and your narrative was easy to follow and understand. I'm now a loyal subscriber.

  • @Ernawati-od3tr
    @Ernawati-od3tr 2 роки тому +2

    This is amazing footage

  • @mikesbaseballcards
    @mikesbaseballcards 2 роки тому +7

    Great footage I never seen before n 88mm footage. Noticed several kubelwagens in the footage. I have a photo of my Opa along with another soldier standing in front of a kubelwagen in the snow somewhere in russia.

  • @fernalonsoau
    @fernalonsoau 2 роки тому +21

    nice footage but the maps were too poor. It is almost impossible to figure out the movements of troops.

  • @Ickie71
    @Ickie71 Рік тому +2

    This Upload made me Sub! :) 🤘

  • @noooboodyy8533
    @noooboodyy8533 2 роки тому +4

    crazy how history repeats itself

  • @tacticalcheese6925
    @tacticalcheese6925 2 роки тому +3

    How u get all that footage tho

  • @skguptagupta1566
    @skguptagupta1566 2 роки тому +25

    German soldiers were very brave. They had fought till their last breath.

  • @kiowhatta1
    @kiowhatta1 10 місяців тому +2

    Between January 31st (Stalingrad) and May 1943 (Tunis) the Axis somewhat needlessly sacrificed somewhere in the order over 1 million men killed, wounded or captured, well over 3,500 aircraft, 1,000 tanks, 7,000, guns, and inestimable amounts of vehicles and other materiel.
    This amounts to a possible 8-9 armies, at least 2 Pz armies, 2 Luftflotte, and enough trucks and vehicles to create over 5-10 motorised divisions.
    These disasters could have been avoided or at least mitigated.
    It’s a miracle the Wehrmacht was still able to stay in the field for 2 years after this catastrophic loss.

  • @tonnywildweasel8138
    @tonnywildweasel8138 2 роки тому +16

    Great info, great footage . Thanks for sharing!
    Greets from the Netherlands 🌷, T.

  • @jaydipbasu916
    @jaydipbasu916 2 роки тому +82

    The Germans were by far the best army in WW2

    • @Abhishek-dc4qu
      @Abhishek-dc4qu Рік тому +7

      I agree. Germans were having the best generals in the army. And their innovative advanced modern technology armament were just 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @janheinbokel3969
      @janheinbokel3969 Рік тому

      Yes, but the leadership of Adolf Hitler wasn't better than Trump

    • @ryanyoder2694
      @ryanyoder2694 Рік тому +17

      @@Abhishek-dc4qu There “best” generals thought they could take over the entire Soviet Union with less then 3 months of supplies. They also thought Russia would fall if Moscow fell, completely ignoring Napoleon’s 1812 Russia campaign were he actually captured Moscow but Russia did not quit and he was defeated. They were good generals but not the best by any means.

    • @Abhishek-dc4qu
      @Abhishek-dc4qu Рік тому +11

      @@ryanyoder2694 They have the best generals. Germans lost 44 lakh soldiers whereas Soviets lost 88 lakh soldiers. Huge population kept them at upper hand. Plus Soviets had allied support. Where as Germans were fighting alone.
      And it was their generals only which helped them to gain that much piece of land.

    • @cia1784
      @cia1784 Рік тому +4

      @@ryanyoder2694not exactly, if the Germans captured Moscow they thought it would create a stir in the soviet Command and Over throw Stalin that of which results to a Peace deal with the USSR and the Germans

  • @wandameadows5736
    @wandameadows5736 Рік тому +10

    Just imagine if Germany had been on a level playing field & weren't outnumber 20 to 1.

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 Рік тому

      They were outnumbered 2 to 1. For every 1 German casualty, there is 1.1 Soviet casualties. 40% of Soviet military deaths was because the Germans killed them as POWs.

    • @wandameadows5736
      @wandameadows5736 Рік тому +3

      @@eliasziad7864 You think they were only facing Russia? I've heard interviews of German troops themselves making this claim. Germany never had a an advantage in numbers during WW2 against the allies. That's why they used the blitzkrieg. Also most of Germanys military was wipe out by the allies after the war. You need to broaden your horizon on history cause your obviously speaking from one country's account. I'm not trying to be pro any nation during WW2 cause the whole thing was bad & should have never happened.

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 Рік тому

      @@wandameadows5736 Are you fucking stupid? USSR destroyed 90% of the German army. What did the US do? Oh kill innocent civilians in japan.

  • @dmathmothtutinean8950
    @dmathmothtutinean8950 2 роки тому +1

    Subscribed👍🏿‼️

  • @ausar3852
    @ausar3852 2 роки тому +27

    I urge everyone to read Manstein's book "lost victories" He was one of the best field marshalls world had ever seen.

    • @VolksdeutscheSS
      @VolksdeutscheSS 2 роки тому +2

      You're right. The other German generals were on his level too, Von Rundstedt, etc. And Paul Hausser of the Waffen-SS was also well-educated and highly effective.

    • @antoinemozart243
      @antoinemozart243 2 роки тому +2

      Lost victories and memories from the pathological liar Manstein was a joke !

    • @Lehr-km5be
      @Lehr-km5be 2 роки тому +1

      Too bad its one of The worst books ever written. It is just a stack of lies. Manstein claims The russians had 8 Times more Men than he had which is not true. He also never mentions The fact that The germans had air superiority :)

    • @VolksdeutscheSS
      @VolksdeutscheSS 2 роки тому

      @@antoinemozart243 I-NetzeTwerg.

    • @chadgaston8615
      @chadgaston8615 2 роки тому

      Great guy who could not care less if Ukrainian kids starve to death. Poles cry but many times in history Germans and Russians have unleashed hell on earth in area known today as Ukraine.

  • @hendriesantio8825
    @hendriesantio8825 Рік тому +3

    One of his trait that makes him become one of the most decorated generallobest in Russia is his bravery to resist Hitler urge to taking hasty attack. While many general like Keitel, Jodl, and Kluge had just trying to appease Fuhrer as they pleased

  • @mrbruce7204
    @mrbruce7204 2 роки тому +11

    We need Von Manstein now!!

    • @chadgaston8615
      @chadgaston8615 2 роки тому

      Cossacks gotit covered. Victims of nazis are defending it now. Manstein was an occupier there, not a friend to the locals.

    • @MD21037
      @MD21037 Рік тому

      Don't we ever!

    • @johnnyb2909
      @johnnyb2909 4 місяці тому

      We germans aint at war

    • @devinfraserashpole4753
      @devinfraserashpole4753 2 місяці тому

      He would still lose.

  • @stephenholmes1036
    @stephenholmes1036 Рік тому +2

    Paul Hausser totally underrated

  • @Mingus8
    @Mingus8 2 місяці тому +1

    World War II, was 90% about the Eastern Front. Many still imagine that Normandy was of any decisive importance.

  • @13Bravo77
    @13Bravo77 2 роки тому +7

    Almost 80 years later again

  • @j3lny425
    @j3lny425 2 роки тому +27

    Decimated means 1/10 The sixth army was not decimated,it was destroyed.

    • @wokejoke2675
      @wokejoke2675 2 роки тому +6

      A few got out on the supply planes

    • @ilostthreeaccountstoyoutub1434
      @ilostthreeaccountstoyoutub1434 2 роки тому +6

      @BekGrou PRIMUS again it was not the high commands fault the soviets got lucky and lend lease carried them to victory

    • @claas.relotius
      @claas.relotius 2 роки тому +3

      @BekGrou PRIMUS learn about the Battle of the Caucasus, maybe then you understand why retreating from stalingrad wasn't the best option

    • @claas.relotius
      @claas.relotius 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@apis_aculei some more of those glorious victories and no one would be left to die for stalin and the communist party

    • @clex9487
      @clex9487 2 роки тому

      @BekGrou PRIMUS well it wasn't terrible leadership on the generals part it was hitler that was the reason why the army got destroyed

  • @samuelpope7798
    @samuelpope7798 Рік тому +2

    It's hard to believe that worldly and capable generals like Manstein, Von Boch, Von Rundstedt, just to name a few, didn`t know the war was hopless after Stalingrad.

    • @vasilirikardsson
      @vasilirikardsson Рік тому

      Smart "generals" knew the outcome before the war with Russia. But it was very dangerous to protest at that time, very high risk to be murdered by your "friends".

  • @johnpendarvis7885
    @johnpendarvis7885 3 місяці тому +1

    I can't imagine fighting in subzero weather.

  • @jpmtlhead39
    @jpmtlhead39 2 роки тому +6

    What they were able to do, so much with so few, specialy since mid's 1943 (kursk), its a feat of Resilience And superb leadership (from The Generals to even Sargents in many ocasions) Unique in Military history.
    They lost The war, but for The majority, of the Allies top brass, they werent expecting, that it took so long. With The Overwhelming superiority, in men (1/10),and material, its was like a miracle, the German Army, hold on for so long.

    • @tolloromassi99
      @tolloromassi99 Рік тому

      Which makes one wonder whether the Germans are indeed the "superior" race?

    • @jpmtlhead39
      @jpmtlhead39 Рік тому +1

      @@tolloromassi99 Who said that the Germans were a superior race...???!!!!

    • @tolloromassi99
      @tolloromassi99 Рік тому

      @@jpmtlhead39 It's a rhetorical question.

    • @jpmtlhead39
      @jpmtlhead39 Рік тому

      @@tolloromassi99 oh iam so sorry mate, i didn't know that.

  • @tylerhiggins3522
    @tylerhiggins3522 2 роки тому +3

    It is a tragedy for Germany and Eastern Europe that Manstein was not in charge of all further operations after this.

    • @chadgaston8615
      @chadgaston8615 2 роки тому

      Those Kharkiv defenders today wish to emulate tactics used by herr Manstein. Famine, terror and other aspects of German occupation they do not miss.

  • @christopherthrawn1333
    @christopherthrawn1333 2 роки тому +1

    This is what happens when Hitler was not allowed to dictate the battle plans.
    It's staggering to think that if Hitler allowed the German High Command to wage war.
    Great work putting together this.

  • @brianleen2986
    @brianleen2986 2 роки тому +2

    master piece of planning and execution

  • @Vrten
    @Vrten 2 роки тому +6

    please do the 5 second effort to pronounce Manstein correct, thank you

    • @Ko.Wi.
      @Ko.Wi. 2 роки тому

      He is already doing very good work regarding the history, he isnt a Native speaker. The emphasis shouldnt lay on pronouncing, but on the facts he presents.

  • @Studios421
    @Studios421 2 роки тому +19

    There are a lot of great ww2 channels out there, but I do particularly enjoy the raw footage compiled here. Is it genuine and content related? Awesome if it is.

    • @alitlweird
      @alitlweird 2 роки тому +1

      I don’t care for the digitized voice.
      (It sounds digitized, anyway)

  • @FirstLast-ml7yf
    @FirstLast-ml7yf 2 роки тому +2

    Interesting the logistical issues in th spring meltout

  • @eslima70
    @eslima70 9 місяців тому +1

    Excelente

  • @tonycoundermann2166
    @tonycoundermann2166 2 роки тому +24

    Erich Von Manstein was called, by a number of historians, the most genius Hitler's general. His book "The Lost Victory" is one of the best -selling books about World War II. I wish Ukraine had as a genius general as Von Manstein to set a deadly trap for the Russian Army in a counter attack.

    • @barfuss2007
      @barfuss2007 2 роки тому +1

      Von Mannstein was resposable for the attacking plan of the Wehrmacht in 1940 in France. The most glorious victory of a german army since Arminius against Varus, which stopped the roman conquering of whole germany.

    • @hansgruber6455
      @hansgruber6455 Рік тому +5

      I wish Ukraine had 10 divisions of Waffen SS to fight the New Soviet Army invading them.

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 Рік тому +1

      Except, the Russian Army trapped the Ukrainian army in Luhansk.

    • @barfuss2007
      @barfuss2007 Рік тому

      @@hansgruber6455
      5 would be enough

    • @stoggafllik
      @stoggafllik Рік тому

      @@hansgruber6455 The waffen ss wouldn’t fight for a shithole like ukraine

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme 2 роки тому +5

    Enjoyed your video so I gave it a Thumbs Up as a support

  • @lokischildren7862
    @lokischildren7862 2 роки тому +1

    A classic example of elastic defence a ambush in the open

  • @grantsmythe8625
    @grantsmythe8625 2 роки тому +2

    Looks like an interesting channel. Subscribed.

  • @cx3268
    @cx3268 2 роки тому +21

    Interesting timing of this video.

  • @somerandomvertebrate9262
    @somerandomvertebrate9262 2 роки тому +12

    Erich von Manstein is not a New York Delicatessen owner. It's pronounced "Manstain", not "Manstien"!

    • @meinolfwestig9463
      @meinolfwestig9463 Рік тому +1

      More like "Mannshtine". The "ei" or "ai" in german is like the english "i". The german "s" followed by a consonant is like an english "sh".

    • @somerandomvertebrate9262
      @somerandomvertebrate9262 Рік тому +1

      @@meinolfwestig9463 Right you are. Thank you, sir!

  • @robgraham5697
    @robgraham5697 2 роки тому +2

    One book I own describes this battle as 'The Last Dance of The Matador'.

  • @samuelpope7798
    @samuelpope7798 Рік тому +1

    That background music is used in Lock N Load Tactical Digital.

  • @ResiRilla26
    @ResiRilla26 2 роки тому +11

    My grandfather was in the ss and fought on the Eastern Front then moved to Dublin in 1946

    • @lev3432
      @lev3432 2 роки тому +7

      Your grandfather was a great man

    • @ResiRilla26
      @ResiRilla26 2 роки тому +5

      @@lev3432 Danke

    • @janda5816
      @janda5816 2 роки тому +4

      @@lev3432 Nah, in all likelihood his grandfather was a war criminal, being he was in the SS and all. And don’t give me any bullshit about the “SS were just regular soldiers” when there is widespread evidence that even regular Wehrmacht units participated in war crimes.

    • @lev3432
      @lev3432 2 роки тому +8

      @@janda5816 His grandfather was a great man.

    • @ResiRilla26
      @ResiRilla26 2 роки тому

      @@janda5816 So by what you're saying the Germans are the only war criminals?

  • @2000Cowboys
    @2000Cowboys Рік тому +3

    In Guy Sajer's book 📖 ( The Forgotten Soldier ) he talks of the devastation of this battle.

  • @Bahamut3525
    @Bahamut3525 Рік тому +1

    "The Germans successfully encircled the Soviet Sixth Army"
    The Irony.

  • @historyvideos8863
    @historyvideos8863 2 роки тому +2

    Impressive information dan fact bytes, btw i also on my way creating a History Channel for YT

  • @richardscanlan3167
    @richardscanlan3167 2 роки тому +5

    The scale of the war on the Eastern Front boggles the mind.50 divisions wiped out - just like that.
    Has to be the worst theatre of war in history - for dead and level of suffering,can't think of any other war that comes close.

  • @laf43777
    @laf43777 Рік тому +11

    Manstein was a great general!

  • @RTmadnesstoo
    @RTmadnesstoo День тому

    Wouldn't it be nice to see a Map or two?

  • @tkyap2524
    @tkyap2524 2 роки тому +14

    The Germans had good generals. But, their boss was erratic. He refused to listen to them.

    • @KillerT-Bone
      @KillerT-Bone 2 роки тому +7

      They still would’ve lost

    • @michaelporter9354
      @michaelporter9354 2 роки тому +1

      Your absolutely right, the Germans never had enough men or material.

    • @Blei1986
      @Blei1986 2 роки тому +4

      to be fair, the idea from abandoning capturing Moscow and instead focus on the oil and supply-important south was actually a god idea.

    • @Arengeesus
      @Arengeesus 2 роки тому

      @@Blei1986 by the way, it was shitler who wants to take caucasus for the oil fields; german generals planned to take moscow to heavily demoralise the soviets but they never knew they would had face the harshest winter for the century.

    • @TrueShoot1000
      @TrueShoot1000 2 роки тому

      @@Blei1986 yea only the idea was good but the plan was the worst

  • @the82spartans62
    @the82spartans62 2 роки тому +24

    I like how the German Wehrmacht had some commanders who followed orders while other did not.

    • @MarjanVukovic
      @MarjanVukovic 2 роки тому

      I like how the Russians followed the sunset position whilst your fellow Nazis obeyed the rules.

    • @the82spartans62
      @the82spartans62 2 роки тому +6

      @@MarjanVukovic - Bolshevik

    • @MarjanVukovic
      @MarjanVukovic 2 роки тому

      @@the82spartans62 Nazi

    • @Peter_Schiavo
      @Peter_Schiavo 2 роки тому +7

      Hauser's SS Panzer Corp occupied Kharkov. He was personally ordered to stay there by Hitler and hold the city. He disobeyed and evacuated it. His three panzer divisions were crucial to Manstein's plan. Because everything worked brilliantly, Hitler could hardly cashier Hauser, but he did award medals for the battle. Hauser was snubbed and didn't receive his.

    • @the82spartans62
      @the82spartans62 2 роки тому +5

      @@Peter_Schiavo - Thanks for the good input.

  • @cedricliggins7528
    @cedricliggins7528 2 місяці тому +1

    I noticed Manstein didn't greet Hitler with Nazi salute.

  • @alexbowman7582
    @alexbowman7582 2 роки тому +2

    This battle was probably a big reason for Eisenhower’s insistence on a broad front European advance.

  • @fpvillegas9084
    @fpvillegas9084 Рік тому +3

    Which Manstein victory is the best? Ans.: All of them 😉👍

  • @VashtheStampede007
    @VashtheStampede007 2 роки тому +9

    Those German generals were holding cigarettes over important military maps... What if they accidentally drop it? 😂

    • @ITR933
      @ITR933 2 роки тому

      They probably had more maps haha

    • @johnnyb2909
      @johnnyb2909 4 місяці тому

      Have you ever dropped a burning cigarrette on a paper?
      Nothing happens you just bruise it off.

  • @laf43777
    @laf43777 Рік тому +2

    They were amazing!

  • @kohtalainenalias
    @kohtalainenalias Рік тому +1

    Manstein's Miracle

  • @wehrmachtberlin5122
    @wehrmachtberlin5122 2 роки тому +3

    all the heart of us is not die..

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 2 роки тому +9

    germans loved a good counterattack

    • @alterKammerad
      @alterKammerad 2 роки тому

      The only thing certain in history is a german counterattack

  • @crazywarriorscatfan9061
    @crazywarriorscatfan9061 2 роки тому

    Interesting

  • @kiowhatta1
    @kiowhatta1 10 місяців тому +2

    It’s pronounced Man - Stine like wine.
    In German anytime you have an ei it’s Like nine, or wine.
    When you have ie it’s pronounced like eel such as Viel ( feel ) the word for many, or a lot.
    Also the addition of the ‘Von’ to an officer’s name such as Von Manstein is an honorary addition dating back to the Prussian noble tradition.
    For example Von means ‘from’, so it could denote the person was from a place or from a noble family.

  • @vladimirsusic5335
    @vladimirsusic5335 2 роки тому +12

    Funny, today we see that tanks are still using big logs as protection...Only difference is they put them nowadays only on the most vulnerable rear side (and yes, top of the tank has thinnest armor...)

    • @tihomirrasperic
      @tihomirrasperic 2 роки тому +8

      logs are not for protection
      it is an aid in getting out of the mud
      if the tank gets stuck, they throw a couple of logs under the tracks so he can "dig himself"

    • @Nick-eq8kq
      @Nick-eq8kq 2 роки тому +3

      Logs provide almost zero (and I mean ZERO) protection against tank round or for that matter even rifles. At the speeds there going, the wood simply splinters and shatters as the projectile runs through it. The loss of energy on the shot would be probably be

  • @jmvm31
    @jmvm31 2 роки тому +4

    This was the last major Victory of Germany in WW2.

  • @kniespel6243
    @kniespel6243 2 роки тому +1

    Manstein ,a brilliant mind !!

  • @_the_indian
    @_the_indian Місяць тому

    Greetings fact-byte channel. I really enjoy your content. Can you tell me the name of the music you used in the opening of this video.

  • @NJTDover
    @NJTDover 2 роки тому +4

    Send von Manstein's grandson over to Ukraine to defend Kharkov.

  • @j.w.b5048
    @j.w.b5048 2 роки тому +21

    2:25 if Hitler would have done that sooner and more often, the war would have been a lot different.

    • @uzzielactub8065
      @uzzielactub8065 2 роки тому +5

      U mean Hitler Could have Listened or Given Command to His Generals

    • @zacoman2225
      @zacoman2225 2 роки тому +1

      True

    • @KotobKotob
      @KotobKotob 2 роки тому +4

      Even if they manage to conquered russia, in 1945 US already got an atomic bomb

    • @ilostthreeaccountstoyoutub1434
      @ilostthreeaccountstoyoutub1434 2 роки тому

      no it wouldn't since the allies would just lend lesse the soviets and air bomb the germans till victory just like in our timeline

    • @uzzielactub8065
      @uzzielactub8065 2 роки тому +1

      Nah The Germans Cannot Conquer Russia Because of its Vast Territory Plus They Lack Oil which Hinder their Offensive Operations

  • @Macdaddy8124U
    @Macdaddy8124U 2 роки тому +1

    Crazy how the Javelin changes everything...........

    • @natotomato4625
      @natotomato4625 2 роки тому

      Are they making a difference? I heard Ukrainians are marching on Moscow this weekend!

  • @kevinflaherty7592
    @kevinflaherty7592 2 роки тому +2

    True but operation citadel was the end of the German armored forces as far as offensive operations go

  • @diddlysquat88
    @diddlysquat88 4 місяці тому +3

    Everybody lost ww2! Look at Europe and the world today..

  • @quikzome6973
    @quikzome6973 2 роки тому +3

    You should make a video about the battle of radzymin in august 1944 where the germans crushed several soviet armies

  • @HeilAmarth
    @HeilAmarth Рік тому

    Much of that battle is owed to II SS Panzer Corps and Totenkopf under Paul Hausser, they were sent to hardest places and had almost 50% casualties. They already had Tigers as well.

  • @marcobagut
    @marcobagut 2 роки тому +1

    Better and more maps would be useful!

  • @paulhart3812
    @paulhart3812 Рік тому +7

    Not their last victory, their last MAJOR victory.
    There were smaller ones later in 1943 and in 1944.