I love the novelisation of this episode in the script book because it has Hacker realise that four people who know absolutely nothing about chemistry are discussing chemistry and he notes just how absurd the situation is. It demonstrates how daft government really is, with ministers appointed to run departments they have no knowledge or understanding of. Health ministers with no medical degrees, the Department of Defence minister having no military experience or knowledge, a Minister of Agriculture who knows nothing about farming and has lived in a city their entire life... As Hacker says in this episode, ministers are appointed specifically because they know nothing.
How daft government is? Why? You think private industry is better? Have you ever called a customer service phone line? A bigger cluster of dumbfucks was never assembled.
@@Cryptonymicus Yeah, if you're going to talk about mismanagement and farce in the private sector, citing customer service phone lines which are done on the cheap using the dregs of the workforce is really not the best way to go.
If a chemist were in the room (and of Metadioxin were a possible compound), or even if Jim Hacker were competent in Chemistry from college, he could give a satisfying answer. "You're confused on the name because you assume that similarly named compounds have similar properties. Chemists name compounds for their molecular structure, and the science of chemistry is so intricate that whatever property gives Metadioxin a different structure from dioxin is enough to ensure a wildly different behavior, so that it is inert. All chemical reactions are born from an instability, when a chemcial substance has too many or too few subatomic components such as neutrons or electrons. The desire to become stable drives most chemical reactions from nuclear fission, the formation of stars, the bubbling of a child's model volcano, and the oxygenation of your bloodstream. A stable compound, by its nature, avoids largely avoids interaction with the environment, and therefore is harmless. The air is filled with an inert gas that goes into your lungs every day without issue- Nitrogen.
@Henry Coy Dunning-Kruger effect then. Lots of people thinking they know better then they do, rather then just pretending they do. Its that whole we've had enough of experts, I know better mentality pushed by high-ranking people such as the entitled anti-intellectual Gove.
"Well all chemicals are dangerous..." He was about to make a good point. It's the amount that matters. Apples contain trace amounts of cyanide. But you'd have to eat so many, other factors would kill you first. It's possible there is a similar situation with MetaDioxin. It may be a diluted version of Dioxin, so much so, that it's basically harmless.
Both that and Jim agreeing to the public inquiry were good points by Jim, but Humphrey just swept it away because it wasn't furthering his goals immediately. Jim really should have put his foot down for the sake of public health.
More than that, it's inert. Non-reactive. Presumably, safe for consumption. But still, might be worth looking into, just to make sure that it actually is inert.
@@g00gleminus96 Metadioxin is fictional - as best as I can tell anyway. Dioxins are a group of compounds - substances made up of two or more different elements - which are very toxic to the human body. The purposeful production of them is forbidden under the Stockholm Convention, but this was from before that.
@@g00gleminus96 metadioxin is fictional as the above commentor says but it does poke fun at the tendency for similarly named compounds to have different toxicological profiles take sodium cyanide and sodium cyanate for example sodium cyanide is well cyanide and sodium cyanate is about as toxic as acetaminophen (1500mg ld50/kg vs 1944 mg ld50/kg ld 50 means the amount needed to cause 50% of the population given the dose to die) not exactly mothers milk but a risk that can be very easily dealt with in general.
Also, "Normal" dioxin is also known as para-dioxin or 1,4-dioxin. Ortho-dioxin is 1,2 dioxin. Meta-dioxin would be 1,3 dioxin. The numbers mean there is an oxygen atom with a second oxygen atom at the second-number position. So, 1,2 has them right next to each other (at 1 and 2). 1,4 has them opposite each other in the molecule (1 at 12 o'clock, 1 at 6 o'clock), and the 1,3 is in between.
Sounds about right. People at the top who can roll off expression after expression in Latin/Greek, but don't understand a thing about science, engineering or anything practical. Wonder how many of the current cabinet have science or engineering degrees? Would be surprised if there are any.
public workers/civil servants don't usually have practical knowledge and generally no actual understanding of what they are doing. in my country they also tend to be home by 14:00.
@@CuFhoirthe88 there are a few words where, similar to super, it is used to mean "out side of, beyond, a higher level of abstraction" etc. Metaphysics, metamagic (spells that affect the behaviour of other spells rather than doing something directly themselves (in some games))
Didn't the cabinet have a specialist in the field to clearly explain that scientific name in plain English and its implications on the environment and health?
Fun fact: Dioxins are implicated in the disastrous health effects re: 'Agent Orange,' a "tactical defoliant" we used liberally in Vietnam. Just in case any of you lovely Brits were under the illusion the American government is any better 🙂
Hard to believe that that's Vera. I wonder what she really sounds like in real life, whether she's posh like she is here, or more blue collar like she is in Vera. _Edit:_ Actually, where you get to the end of the clip and she gets a bit frustrated, you can hear some of Vera leaking through in her voice there.
Wouldn't it be good if the teaching of science and modern languages were given greater priority in schools and if the people running the show actually had some understanding of science and engineering.
The lessons are as I see: Never go to a politician without knowing full facts of what it is about. And they lie, and short term monetary interests are all they and the market care about and the poisoning of environment is the least of their concerns as that is after many political cycles, something they do not compute.
That's the danger you have with democracy. When you elect someone, there first priority is always to keep their job. Democracy is a sickness which must be cured.
I worked in the civil service in the United States. It was more like Yes, Minister than I'd care to remember: My agency, a tax regulator, was headed by a political appointee, a healthcare company lobbyist.
Taki jest cały ten serial telewizyjny. Wiele historii zostało zaczerpniętych z rzeczywistych wydarzeń i prawdziwych ludzi, ale zmieniono je dla uzyskania humorystycznego efektu.
The BBC is forbidden by law from doing lots of things free, or even cheaply. It would be contrary to competition law. For example when the BBC had a few stores selling DVDs and stuff they had to be very careful NOT to undercut local WHSmiths, HMV etc because they could sue the BBC for using public money to compete unfairly. In putting clips on UA-cam I would assume the BBC still pays the writers royalties, but to do so out of licence fee funds for a clip shown on a commercial website would be naughty, and possibly illegal. It's the same reason BBC America has adverts. It would be illegal for the BBC to use licence fee money to fund broadcasts outside the UK public service remit AND other broadcasters in America could sue under competition laws. How could they compete fairly when they have to show adverts and a BBC channel didn't?
I was in the scholarship form, did Classics (Latin and Greek) AND Chemistry and Physics, and I would say that Classics is by far the easiest of the three, which is why I went on to do Physics. Classics is best reserved for thickos like Boris Johnson. And metadioxin doesn't exist.
The additional one word can indeed mean a subtle difference, such as that between 'cleansing' and 'ethnic cleansing'
Ah, but does it take the ablative?
I love the novelisation of this episode in the script book because it has Hacker realise that four people who know absolutely nothing about chemistry are discussing chemistry and he notes just how absurd the situation is.
It demonstrates how daft government really is, with ministers appointed to run departments they have no knowledge or understanding of. Health ministers with no medical degrees, the Department of Defence minister having no military experience or knowledge, a Minister of Agriculture who knows nothing about farming and has lived in a city their entire life...
As Hacker says in this episode, ministers are appointed specifically because they know nothing.
It worries me that being sick of experts is a fairly popular view. I hope it's just a phase.
And here we are some 40 years later yet nothing has changed.
How daft government is? Why? You think private industry is better? Have you ever called a customer service phone line? A bigger cluster of dumbfucks was never assembled.
@@Cryptonymicus
Yeah, if you're going to talk about mismanagement and farce in the private sector, citing customer service phone lines which are done on the cheap using the dregs of the workforce is really not the best way to go.
@@Cryptonymicus How daft *our* government is
If a chemist were in the room (and of Metadioxin were a possible compound), or even if Jim Hacker were competent in Chemistry from college, he could give a satisfying answer.
"You're confused on the name because you assume that similarly named compounds have similar properties. Chemists name compounds for their molecular structure, and the science of chemistry is so intricate that whatever property gives Metadioxin a different structure from dioxin is enough to ensure a wildly different behavior, so that it is inert. All chemical reactions are born from an instability, when a chemcial substance has too many or too few subatomic components such as neutrons or electrons. The desire to become stable drives most chemical reactions from nuclear fission, the formation of stars, the bubbling of a child's model volcano, and the oxygenation of your bloodstream. A stable compound, by its nature, avoids largely avoids interaction with the environment, and therefore is harmless. The air is filled with an inert gas that goes into your lungs every day without issue- Nitrogen.
Well of course. But no-one in Govt. knows any science.
@Henry Coy Dunning-Kruger effect then. Lots of people thinking they know better then they do, rather then just pretending they do. Its that whole we've had enough of experts, I know better mentality pushed by high-ranking people such as the entitled anti-intellectual Gove.
The problem is competence doesn't tend to be as funny.
That sounds more like Doctor Who than Yes, Minister.
There's nothing 'science' about chemistry. Chemistry is so random it's like running the bingo and pulling out ball number minus five.
"Well all chemicals are dangerous..."
He was about to make a good point. It's the amount that matters. Apples contain trace amounts of cyanide. But you'd have to eat so many, other factors would kill you first. It's possible there is a similar situation with MetaDioxin. It may be a diluted version of Dioxin, so much so, that it's basically harmless.
@TheRenaissanceman65 Ah yes, serious levels found in the water supply. You might say people are swimming in it!
Could an apple a day prove fatal then?
Both that and Jim agreeing to the public inquiry were good points by Jim, but Humphrey just swept it away because it wasn't furthering his goals immediately.
Jim really should have put his foot down for the sake of public health.
More than that, it's inert. Non-reactive. Presumably, safe for consumption.
But still, might be worth looking into, just to make sure that it actually is inert.
Meta means the chemical has a different shape.
My inner chemist is laughing... and my inner chemistry teaching is violently sobbing.
I'm an inert chemist, doesn't ert me
Hahahaha
Can you ask one of those chap to explain what metadioxin actual is.
@@g00gleminus96 Metadioxin is fictional - as best as I can tell anyway.
Dioxins are a group of compounds - substances made up of two or more different elements - which are very toxic to the human body. The purposeful production of them is forbidden under the Stockholm Convention, but this was from before that.
@@g00gleminus96 metadioxin is fictional as the above commentor says but it does poke fun at the tendency for similarly named compounds to have different toxicological profiles take sodium cyanide and sodium cyanate for example sodium cyanide is well cyanide and sodium cyanate is about as toxic as acetaminophen (1500mg ld50/kg vs 1944 mg ld50/kg ld 50 means the amount needed to cause 50% of the population given the dose to die) not exactly mothers milk but a risk that can be very easily dealt with in general.
Not a word wasted. Every facial expression is perfect. The best.
Also, "Normal" dioxin is also known as para-dioxin or 1,4-dioxin. Ortho-dioxin is 1,2 dioxin.
Meta-dioxin would be 1,3 dioxin. The numbers mean there is an oxygen atom with a second oxygen atom at the second-number position. So, 1,2 has them right next to each other (at 1 and 2). 1,4 has them opposite each other in the molecule (1 at 12 o'clock, 1 at 6 o'clock), and the 1,3 is in between.
That's nice but for reasons that are quite obvious to chemists 1,3-dioxin is unable to exist.
Wouldn't the proper chemical name then be, dioxybenzene?
Normal Dioxin is : 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin
I love how, eliteness of both universities cannot be expressed more beautifully.
"The Universities. Both of them"
-Sir Humphrey when talking about subsidy
It is interesting to an American. While Harvard, Yale, MIT, and so forth all have their snob factor, they’ve got nothing when compared to Oxbridge.
Was Bernard at Cambridge?
@@readsomebooks666 nope, oxford
Once upon a time sure. It's not like that any more.
What does inert mean?
That it's not Ert.
!!
Bernard- Would nt hurt a fly
Lol 😅😂
Bernard's sotto voce quip about the fly is one of my favourites.
As ever, Bernard steals the scene by his quips😂
It’s Brenda blethyn, commonly known as VERA, a great show, a must watch
Twice Oscar nominated!
As always, Bernard has the best - if infrequent - lines.
"What does inert mean" :-D oh geezus his answer !!!
@3:23 he says "we agree that the only difference is in the name..."
Surely he meant the only similarity?
That's one of the jokes in the bit
Good catch. I watched this clip 5 times yet I didn't notice it.
"What does 'inert' mean?"
"Well, it means that it's not...ert."
As a chemist by training, I HOWLED with laughter at this exchange!
"Wouldn't ert a fly"
What does it actually mean? That it doesn't react with other chemicals?
@@kapitankapital6580 Correct.
Sounds about right. People at the top who can roll off expression after expression in Latin/Greek, but don't understand a thing about science, engineering or anything practical. Wonder how many of the current cabinet have science or engineering degrees? Would be surprised if there are any.
public workers/civil servants don't usually have practical knowledge and generally no actual understanding of what they are doing. in my country they also tend to be home by 14:00.
Boris read classics, Raab law, Rishi and Truss PPE, and Priti forwent university to qualify as a concentration camp administrator.
@@SpeckleKen Well, shows Priti is qualified for the job then.
@@GoldenSunAlex
If you want the citizens of the UK to be treated by their government as concentration camp inmates, yes.
@@apocalypseyah7870 Except that that ones we're putting in camps aren't UK citizens, so it's ok.
Good. Now I memorized META forever😂
1:21 …in other words with or after dioxin, sometimes beyond d’oxin…😂
Is that a young Brenda Blethyn?
For once, Humphrey was not in his elements. Was hoping Bernard would jump in to elaborate on it. Humphrey's compound interest response was hilarious.
Humphery should have just asked for his chemist friend and expert
Full episode please
A very young Brenda Blethyn as the bewildered MP.
2:12 it means it’s not……ert 😂
"...broadly speaking..." LOL
Hacker: won't cost us more than 100 votes.
My majority is 91. Lol.
what does that mean? she needs 91 votes to get a majority? there are constituencies that small??
@@thegoonist that means she only won by 91 votes in the last election
@@Niatnuom_Esiotrot ah yes that makes much more sense! thanks!
@@thegoonist what it means is, it's a joke, she only has 91 not a 100 majority. Get it? Hacker thinks a 100 votes to lose means nothing. Get it?
@@Niatnuom_Esiotrot it's a math joke. Hacker saying so what a 100 votes to lose means shit. She said she only has 91 majority not a hundred lol.
This episode was good. It is not every day you get to agree with Humphery
A young Brenda Blethyn.
Gerry got a promotion
Put it on iplayer
Nick Clegg explaining the new name to Zuckerberg
No wonder Mark Zuckerberg desperately wanted to name his company Meta! 😂
Hahaha, I was looking for this
A video with no dislikes??? Absolute gem
Now 1
Meta is often sinonymous with super. That is the funniest part.
When?
@@CuFhoirthe88 there are a few words where, similar to super, it is used to mean "out side of, beyond, a higher level of abstraction" etc. Metaphysics, metamagic (spells that affect the behaviour of other spells rather than doing something directly themselves (in some games))
@@laurencefraser That doesn't address what I was asking about "meta". And I already know all of that.
"Beyond dioxin"😂
Same name with META stuck in front of it. Zuckerberg must have watched this episode when he decided to change Facebook's name.
Vera!!!
DCI Vera Stanthorpe in her previous life!
Hahaha l love this show very funny it makes me laugh
what did Humphrey say at 2:22?
Mrs Littler should have met with the PM instead: she was a Research Chemist.
3:23 shouldn’t similarity be used rather than difference?
When you prioritize classics over chemistry as the hallmark of a solid education
Hacker and Humphery should have just simple said that they can fix meeting with the Chemist who will explain her everything.
Hydrogen peroxide is a bleaching agent used in rocketry, hydrogen dioxide is water. Similar chemical names do not equate to similar chemicals.
Well, hydrogen monoxide really (or dihydrogen monoxide). Ooh, sounds like carbon monoxide - therefore water could be deadly poisonous :)
Didn't the cabinet have a specialist in the field to clearly explain that scientific name in plain English and its implications on the environment and health?
There was a specialist appointed by Sir Humphrey, not the cabinet
@@johnking5174 I see. Thank you Sir.
I also thought. Why not just call the expert in room then?
Is that Brenda blethyn
Ctrl + F , then type " Brenda "
Meta = Boundary marker of higher level. Dioxin = Byproducts of herbicides. 🕯
Fun fact: Dioxins are implicated in the disastrous health effects re: 'Agent Orange,' a "tactical defoliant" we used liberally in Vietnam.
Just in case any of you lovely Brits were under the illusion the American government is any better 🙂
Who is here after the fb rebranding?🤣🤣
Hard to believe that that's Vera. I wonder what she really sounds like in real life, whether she's posh like she is here, or more blue collar like she is in Vera. _Edit:_ Actually, where you get to the end of the clip and she gets a bit frustrated, you can hear some of Vera leaking through in her voice there.
Now i don't want any chemistry Eggheads ruining the video by giving metadoxin explanation.
The best explanation is that metadioxin is en entirely sensible name which specifically describes something that doesn't and cannot exist.
@@Quintinohthree Too technical for me.
Wouldn't it be good if the teaching of science and modern languages were given greater priority in schools and if the people running the show actually had some understanding of science and engineering.
Add politics to that. Who is in your local council?
The lessons are as I see:
Never go to a politician without knowing full facts of what it is about.
And they lie, and short term monetary interests are all they and the market care about and the poisoning of environment is the least of their concerns as that is after many political cycles, something they do not compute.
That's the danger you have with democracy. When you elect someone, there first priority is always to keep their job.
Democracy is a sickness which must be cured.
2:58 Compound:
Life was hard before google.
You had a thing called libraries and books
Brilliant show not a lot of Americans understood it!!!!!
And are you an American?
I worked in the civil service in the United States. It was more like Yes, Minister than I'd care to remember:
My agency, a tax regulator, was headed by a political appointee, a healthcare company lobbyist.
Meta is the new Facebook.
An odd series about government especially
for the British of the time period.
Couldn’t cost us more about a hundred votes…
My majority is 91.
Oh c'mon! inert is basic english!! ;-D
How can they not know the meaning of inert or compound???
Is modern physics metaphysis? I will say, very much so. What about you dear spokesman of Einstein on Earth?
This really happens at government level
I assume the last 2 years decisions were made along same lines?
Its not ‘ert’
Facebook jokes in 3,2,1...
You insert -o- and it becomes meta.
Litler and Hitler
Pół żartem - pół serio .
Myślę , że to właściwie jest prawda tylko nam ją przekazano w formie żartu .
Taki jest cały ten serial telewizyjny. Wiele historii zostało zaczerpniętych z rzeczywistych wydarzeń i prawdziwych ludzi, ale zmieniono je dla uzyskania humorystycznego efektu.
The lady looks similar to Molly from Sherlock.
That's Brenda Blethyn, later to play the detective. " Vera". Amazing range she has!
Bullshitting is a true art form.
Ads on BBC content. Demand your license fee back.
Get Adblock.
The BBC is forbidden by law from doing lots of things free, or even cheaply. It would be contrary to competition law. For example when the BBC had a few stores selling DVDs and stuff they had to be very careful NOT to undercut local WHSmiths, HMV etc because they could sue the BBC for using public money to compete unfairly. In putting clips on UA-cam I would assume the BBC still pays the writers royalties, but to do so out of licence fee funds for a clip shown on a commercial website would be naughty, and possibly illegal. It's the same reason BBC America has adverts. It would be illegal for the BBC to use licence fee money to fund broadcasts outside the UK public service remit AND other broadcasters in America could sue under competition laws. How could they compete fairly when they have to show adverts and a BBC channel didn't?
I was in the scholarship form, did Classics (Latin and Greek) AND Chemistry and Physics, and I would say that Classics is by far the easiest of the three, which is why I went on to do Physics. Classics is best reserved for thickos like Boris Johnson.
And metadioxin doesn't exist.
A video with no dislikes??? Absolute gem
Well only up today. Soon someone will get angry.
And already someone is angry now. Within but a day of the upload.