MY REACTION: CHANEL CEO LEENA NAIR gives RARE interview |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 кві 2024
  • I hopped on this topic after @abriefcaseofluxury invited other creators to join the conversation! I’ve also seen @SuperDacob do a reaction, and would love to hear one from @Jessiestyle and anyone we lose who wants to join in!
    What do YOU think of all this??
    DISCLAIMER: this video is for entertainment purposes only; don’t come for me Chanel or Leena!
    Let’s be friends! Please like, comment, subscribe and share my content, I SO appreciate you!!! 🥰

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @mor.6448
    @mor.6448 Місяць тому +2

    I would love to know how much of Chanel’s policies are influenced or decided by the Wertheimer…
    Thank you for this video. As an outpriced long term Chanel „fan“ I find it super interesting to see where the company is going, starting with the never ending price increases to their decline in quality. I recently also watched a video about the decline in their make up quality. So it seems this is across the board. Personally I predict that Chanel will die a slow death right before our eyes and that the management is already covering the beginning of it up.

    • @wittingchic
      @wittingchic  Місяць тому

      I know, I wonder about that too, who’s really in control… 🧐 thank you for watching!! I really am sad about the declining quality of such a heritage brand, but they get what they deserve for the blatant price gouging, imo.

  • @elenoredanielsson6771
    @elenoredanielsson6771 Місяць тому +1

    The interview 😪and about Leena😪I hope Chanel 👀 the reality and level up…

    • @wittingchic
      @wittingchic  Місяць тому

      I agree with you!! Thanks for watching!!

  • @tara_nguyen
    @tara_nguyen Місяць тому +3

    chanel owns the tweed manufacturer it used for their clothes. So they pay themselves, hence i think that's why the price is so high. It's pseudo money.

    • @wittingchic
      @wittingchic  Місяць тому

      Hmmm that’s interesting!!! 🤔 if anything I would think they could reduce costs if more of the process was in-house?!

    • @tara_nguyen
      @tara_nguyen Місяць тому +1

      @@wittingchic the business operates as its own entity.

    • @wittingchic
      @wittingchic  Місяць тому +1

      @@tara_nguyen interesting! Thanks for letting me know!

  • @easy_daisy_education
    @easy_daisy_education 24 дні тому

    Hallo. You sound prepared and well spoken and I really like your straight to the point style. I used to work in fashion at high level then left everything for the hypocrisy I witnessed and the disgust for unethical practices. I have a channel similar in size to yours so i thought to write a message. I like to support new channels. I wish you luck and keep up the good work. Lucas

    • @wittingchic
      @wittingchic  14 днів тому +1

      Hi Lucas! Thank you so much for your support, I really appreciate it! 😊 Happy to have you in our little community!

  • @NothingButBags
    @NothingButBags Місяць тому +1

    So glad you covered this. I wasn’t aware of the interview. I am curious if she’s a scapegoat or a player. Most CEO’s and c-suite get incentives for increased profits. More stock in publicly owned companies and bonuses for non-publicly owned. Up to the millions for making more money for the company. She likely has a vested interest in the profits. I would think they have warehouses of materials and parts so they aren’t having rising costs to make the products. They certainly aren’t paying their people more. It’s disappointing for those of us relatively new to luxury houses who wanted Chanel bags and won’t ever be able to afford them.

    • @wittingchic
      @wittingchic  Місяць тому +1

      Oh 1000%! I’m realizing I wasn’t clear about this, but she is most DEFINITELY playing along and in it for her own profits. Her shares are rising along with the rest of the c-suite. But they needed someone who would be okay with the arrangement, and she strikes me as one who will be a good soldier-play along, tow the party line, don’t rock the boat. Make the corporate greed palatable because it’s coming from a more progressive-seeming face and figurehead. So, she’s a willing scapegoat. Very frustrating all around for people who want that brand to be better.