Great review as per normal, thank you. I just bought the new Bullet 350 to a great extent based on your brilliant reviews for the Classic 350. I'm in the Cotswolds and it should be perfect for the back lanes/ B Roads which is all I'm after. Figured if it was good enough for you at your stature then it would be good enough for me at 6ft 15st. Cheers, Christian.
the only difference between classic and bullet is the crank of bullet is heavier then other bikes of royal enfield and yes no doubt bullet 350 needs extra maintenance as compared to others.
I've been riding for well over fifty years. I've road raced, I've toured. I've pretty much done it all. Loved every minute of it. Then I bought my Classic 350 and fell in love with motorcycling all over again. City riding, back lane country riding... It does it all! I took it last summer on a three day, 1100 mile tour through the canyons and mountains of Arizona and Colorado and it was a fabulous steed! Take your time and stay off the freeways and it'll will be plenty of motorcycle and you will always be happy to get on again the next morning. I've owned it now for about a year and a half and I'm NEVER disappointed in the bike!
When I first rode motorbikes a 50cc to125 cc was classed as a small bike, a 350 cc to 500cc was a mid range bike a 750 upwards was a large bike. I drove hgv on motorways for 45years at 60 mph then with tachometer 56 mph , I’m quite happy sitting at 60mph with my 350 classic on the motorway ,there is slower things than me there . Love your prog, keep up the good work.
60mph on UK motorways on a bike will put you in the maximum danger zone. Might be ok in your lorry at 100kph, but as you say it’s 56mph/90kph I believe.
I'm from the US and I think it's so interesting that people wonder if a 350 is enough as that was a pretty decent size when I started riding, back in 1972. Back then, a 650 was as big as things got (except for the Harleys which were obviously insanely large at 900 and 1200). We took trips of hundreds of miles on bikes as small as a CB-175. A bike like a CB-350 or GT-380 was considered to be a fine touring machine for two-up. I do recognize that the 55-mph national speed limit was a big help, for smaller bikes, but the bikes themselves were fine.
I rode a CL 350 Honda from Charleston S.C. to Rhode Island twice back in 72 and 73. Not one issue except the crappy weather in November. Bought it brand new in 71 for 850$ and sold it in 74 for 800 $ with 13k miles on it. The most reliable machine I have ever known.
Been riding bike in the North Texas area for almost 25 years and honestly im looking forward to stepping down to a 350. I have no desire to chase power or speed anymore. I am not interested in freeway/interstate roads either with high speeds and incompetent distracted drivers. Give me a classic 350 and the backroads around my neighborhood and county and ill be a happy camper just putting along at 40mph
I think what it's all about is enjoying the pleasure of riding. Here in South America there is a biker, Pablo Imhoff, Argentine, who is making the journey from Argentina to Alaska, and he is doing it on a Honda C-90, at the moment he is already in Guatemala. So if the question is whether 350cc is enough, of course it is.
I've ridden for over 50 years now. I've had all sorts of bikes and some really beefy sports bikes. Those are still out there if you need power. For me, this bike is more fun than damn near anything I've ever owned (Royal Enfield Classic 350). If/when I feel the need in my 60's to go faster, I'll just get a 2nd bike. Stop and smell the roses - or coffee. If that's not your thing, move on... Ride Safe 🙏🏼
Well said, I’ve been riding for over 40 years and have had some very powerful bikes but the 2 that were the most fun to ride was my wife’s BMW F650CS and my RE Himalayan. I don’t know why people have to spend their time bashing something, if it’s not for you then move on.
i rode a royal enfield 350 electra 2001 model all over India. i did approx 25000kms on her and she never once let me down. i went from south to north. east to west. if she is capable of climbing the himalayas and navigating the sandy dunes of Rajasthan then that is more than enough. theres a reason enfield has survived so long in india. she is arduous, easy to repair, beautiful and by no means the least she purrs when she talks. nothing but love
That's very true - however the roads in the UK are NOTHING like India. Here everywhere except for back roads are packed, absolutely packed and countless HGV vehicles. Although I love the concept of the 350 it certainly presents challenges to safety in many situations
I use my classic 350 on the freeway and it's a blast. Also lots of fun dropping down a gear and overtaking on said freeway. Too many people hung up on data sheet specs rather than riding.
I have an HNTR 350. Last summer I was going in the moutain with my girlfriend in the back. A lot of motorcycle going along with us, nearly all more powerful than mine, but we reach the top of the moutain at the same time. No need to have a lot of horse power to cruise along beautiful moutain road
Those Royal Enfields are gorgeous, I sat on some yesterday in a bike shop and they are so much nicer than the videos can show, you got to see them in the flesh to appreciate how excellent they look and how extremely well built they are. Power is good but if doing 40 mph up a hill on a more main road you'd have cars up your backside trying to force you off the road but for most people 300-500 CC is more than enough. I'm currently on a Tmax 500 and I think this is fast, more than fast enough for normal people lol. I'd rather ride a slower bike fast than a fast bike slow.
Thank you for this great video from you... the Royal Enfield Hunter is currently the only motorcycle that combines classic elements of the 70s with the emotion of the unique single-cylinder at an affordable, reasonable price... Of course you can't expect miracles from the small engine, but as a biker like me, I'm 50 years old, it manages to conjure up a SMILE on your face every day... wonderful The Classic 350 is my favorite although I also love the Hunter and ride it every day. Luckily I'm in the position of having bought 3 of these great RE models... Importantly, I would like to say THANK YOU that there are people and UA-cam pages like yours. You convey the feelings and situations so clearly that as a fan of classic motorcycles I say thank you and you make the whole thing authentic and great... Thank you for your great reports..... Clemens from Saarland / Germany 😎🤗👌👍👍👍👍
Totally agree guys Whats the biggest selling bike of all time ? The Honda Cub, and the biggest engine size thats ever come in is just 125cc but more have been bought as 50 and 90cc Yet its sold over 300 million because those buying them know what they are best suited to and want them for that job.
Thanks for the honest review on the smaller Royal Enfields. I live in the Northeast US and these bikes interest me, I prefer riding the rural country roads. That 411 Scram really interest me.
I agree. I live in Houston Texas and my Meteor 350 is a great city motorcycle. However, it is wonderful on back road day trips. I agree that it's not the best on freeways but if forced to ride on one for a few exits, it will do the job just fine.
350's and 500's are awesome compromises of power and economy. Years ago I owned a 500 bullet and I was thrilled every time I rode it. I also had a Triumph 1200 bagger for big trips but that 500 was all about the simple fun. I'd ride a 350 version without complaint in they ways you've shown it in this video. Thank you for uploading this video.
Ridden many different bikes here in the UK both large and small capacity. For me the smaller cc bikes are my preference, because I don't go on motorways unless I need too and I'm not interested in racing around everywhere. My bike is my primary transport as I don't drive cars, so the fact they are mostly very economical on fuel, cheap to tax, insure, maintain and will do everything I need them too is why they are my preference. Nothing against the bigger bikes and I get why many folk like them, but they just aren't for me.
I'm 71 and I have 2 250's and a 400. I like them all. I don't drive on highways, so the smaller bikes are perfect for me. I just ride for fun and relaxation.
Agreed. I've never owned anything bigger than a 600 since '72. My adventures only last a day and I'm in no rush to get there. Sometimes it's not the number of miles, but where you do them. I have the Meteor 350 and a Honda Navi currently.
Putting a DNA filter kit on these 350s will increase power by 10%. It does work and can make all the difference on these low powered bikes. Just completed 600km trip in the mountains of British Columbia with mine. No issues.
Power is nice to have in reserve. A lifetime on bikes and perhaps my most fun was as a 17 year old on a 29bhp Kawasaki KH250 some many years ago. But city riding isn’t fun, mummies in X5s will try to kill you without even thinking. For that you need agility, power, shit hot brakes and good tyres. Those mummies are still out there on country roads too taking little Jonny to private school. For that you need more power to keep away from them.
I tend to disagree. I don’t need much power either, but having a bit of a reserve is nice to have. I, for example, live in a very hilly area and overtaking a tractor or so would be almost impossible with that bike. Also, I’m a bit disappointed with the „uniqueness“ of the engine. For me it’s not characterful enough for the lack of power. Other people might like it, because it’s quite smooth and so, but for me, if I don’t have power, I at least want to have something else going on (some more vibration and sound) to make up for it. Probably the reason, why I have a V7 as a daily. For me it’s the perfect combination of character and uniqueness with enough power to actually use it everywhere.
There is lifting power too. If a bike struggles to maintain above 65mph on flat or rolling lowlands, then it is likely to bog horribly on steep highways and roads. Nobody keeps a RE long near me for this reason. If you remain in the village they are perfect, but outside of the small town the most enjoyable roads climb from 1200ft to 6000ft. Maintaining 45 and 50mph is a struggle with an adult rider on this 350 and the exhaust gets very hot. Typically the bigger motor new Himalayan handles it better....but not everyone wants a dirt bike dual sport for long paved rides. Nice bike design, and well balanced, but basically an old Rebel 250 (234cc) equivalent with 1/4 more static weight. For most riders in most rolling country riding then it is just fine.
I’ve owned many bikes and scooters, from Honda Spree’s and Elites to DRZ400s, GSXR’s, to a CBR 1100XX and my modded 100hp HD Fatboy to name a few. I seen a RE 350 Classic Signals desert sand at a dealer last week and I can’t stop thinking about going back to buy it lol
I have the Hunter 350 and a Triumph 900 scrambler plus some proper classics. For all my local riding, back road scratching and the like, I much prefer the little Hunter 350, definitely has enough power to be FUN!!
My motorway days are over, furthermore, I very rarely travel on major A class roads. I live in the Yorkshire Dales, and ride the Dales roads all the time, with an occasional foray into the Lake district, and the Scottish borders. The 350 Bullet is perfect for the kind of roads I ride, and I have no need for speed. Speed is for folk who have no patience, or are in a rush. Enjoying motorcycling, and marveling at the fabulous vistas on offer to this 77 year old is what I am looking for.
I have a 2022 classic 350. I had it for about a year and a half and coming up on 4500 miles. The bottom line is just that: here in the US if you want to ride on the highway, yes, you would need a more powerful bike unless you want to be holding on for dear life at 65 or 70. I do a lot of city and back road riding here in Seattle and a bit on the Olympic Peninsula. It’s perfect for that. It’s not bad that it gets 85+ miles to the gallon as well. handling is fantastic. Very agile.If speed is not your thing. I would highly recommend it. Cheers from the Pacific Northwest!
I’m new to the Classic 350 (love it!), the only tricky part with this engine / its power is the run-in period. If you follow RE’s guidelines / rev limits, it’s hard to pull hills without angering drivers behind you (and where I live hills are hard to avoid). And the run-in period is a good 1000 miles, where at that point the engine really comes to life and opens up from what everyone says. I’ve had fast bikes. They’re awesome. But honestly, not sure why, I’m having way more fun on this 350 lately.
Strange how that happens, one of my mates has had all sorts of bikes , at the moment he's got a Honda Shadow 750 cruiser , lovely condition and very smooth, he has two classic B S A s an ( A7 ) & an ( A6 ) he bought a classic 350cc Royal Enfield last year and he loves it , like you say its really all about what puts a smile on your face 😀.
My Honda 650 seems to sit in the garage a lot these days since buying a Hunter as my every day work horse. I did take it for a 200 mile trip not so long ago, just to see how it worked out motorway riding, & it seemed to hold out quite well, although overtakes had to be planned well in advance. Shalln't lie to you though - it really could do with an extra 5HP.
Sensible review! A 350 (in my case an AJS Model 8) has all the performance needed for more than 95% of the riding I do and doesn't burn more petrol than necessary. I imagine these RE machines would fit the needs of most people riding in a suburban environment.
It's got enough power. It's not as if there are not a million other bikes for those that say "If only it had another X hp". I'm currently riding a 950 cruiser but often bitterly regret selling my 125 VanVan, I think you've got to be open minded & be prepared to adapt, if you are then these RE 350's look immense fun.
I use my meteor 350 daily and its just shy of 17,000 miles. I've never bothered with the valves and do the oil changes myself. Its been fantastic and has never let me down, it never gets cleaned and lives a fairly tough life especially starting as an ex demo. Ive been on long tours and it goes down the motorway everyday, im often in the outside lane but simply come back to the inside lane when things move at a higher pace. I think the obsession with power is ridiculous, Royal Enfield have never made high powered motorcycles. A sub 4 thousand bike out the factory is what it is, theres always the choice to buy a sportsbike etc but lets face it most of those just end up poodling to the local cafe in the summer for a tea
The 350 series of motorbikes by Royal Enfield have enough power for having fun. For enjoying the ride. For stopping not only to smell the roses but to have a hot fudge sundae with whipped cream, nuts and a cherry on top and a glass of iced tea. In other words, Royal Enfield's 350s have a reasonable amount of power to get you "there and back again". And by "there" I do mean the memories of days long past and by "back" I do mean "home". And "again" means over and over. There's a kid inside each of us and it only takes a certain smell, sound or scenery for that kid to surface and remind us that no one dies alone so long as they have a lifetime of memories within them. A Royal Enfield 350 is perfect for jump starting the kid in you. SS
I'm in Melbourne, Aus & started with a Honda Grom (cool, but limited application as wasn't very stable after 80km/h). Then bought a Honda CB500X to get into a bigger bike, but didn't gel with it; it was like a two wheeled 4x4 & I realised I wasn't going to tour on it. Next bought an RE 350 Classic Reborn in gunmetal & love it. Has so much charm, peppy in the suburbs & just feels as though it's your friend & will look after you. Yes, I was also concerned about the weight/power, but it goes far better than you'd think.
No no no! You won’t be left behind because you can use all of the power on the roads! Also, if you fit the DNA filter and intake, Hitchcock’s stainless steel free flow exhaust system and FuelX lite, you will undo most of the euro 5 nonsense and unlock most of the engines potential. I’m now getting ready to fit the Kent cam to my Classic, which should get me up to 24 or 25 hp at the wheel. This is much closer to what the designer of the engine had in mind before the bureaucrats got involved. Bullet 500 performance from a 350! Just as it should be. Having said that, these bikes are great, out of the crate. It’s just that in my 48th year of riding I can’t bring myself not to tinker and improve my ride… btw, 70mph all day long, no problem, even stock.
I suspect the 350 is choked by engine mapping, for longevity and emissions. An overhead valve 350 should be capable of higher speeds, but that's kind of missing the point and other bikes are available if speed's a priority. Other tweaks will squeeze a few more bhp out of the thing.
@@borderlands6606 the J platform engine is an overhead cam engine, and was originally intended to be capable of 90mph, which is well within the design capabilities. It was restricted with a speed limiter that works off the ABS ring and ECU. This was done to satisfy insurance regulators in the Asian market. My information comes from Hitchcock’s, who in turn had the information from sources involved with testing the Hunter prototypes. The only thing we can’t fix yet, is this speed limiter, but I suspect somebody will find a way before long. There is a rumour that the Hunter ECU does not have a speed limiter, but as yet I have no solid proof of this, but there are people looking into this.
@@TheNorfolkThunderbolt Yes, I agree with all that, and always thought the J-platform would make an inexpensive club racing class if someone could unlock the ecu. A Classic with clip-ons, rear sets and a racing tank would be a head turner. Then a racing cam and improved breathing would make for a fast little bike.
@@borderlands6606 well, you never know what might happen in the future! Maybe some enterprising people might do just that. It would be a marvellous thing!
Another excellent, honest review. All I can say is that I've gone from a fast 120bhp bike to one just under 30 bhp. Of course the smaller bike is slower, but enjoy the back roads so much more now not having to hold back constantly and dodging the potholes and getting stuck behind car's anyway...
I Know where youre coming from in terms of powerful bikes often being tremendously frustrating on British roads , due to our abysmal roads, poor standards of driving, congestion, speed cameras, lousy weather etc., etc...
Just about to head off to Spain and ride up the length of France to Normandy on my classic 350. For the roads were travelling on it’ll be just fine. It’s already done John O’ Groats to Lands End, including riding to JOG from Devon to start and a tour of Brittany last year. Go slow, enjoy the journey and take your time. Simples.
As a matter of personal reference, I spent about a week in the Blue Ridge Mountains in North Carolina late last year with my brother on his Himmy, and me on my Hunter 350 doing some moto camping, and traversing the mountain roads and routes with absolutely no problem whatsoever going up any grade, and cornering, which was it’s strong suite. At no point in time did I feel like I needed more power to tackle those roads. As a matter of fact, more power would only have gotten me into trouble I’m afraid. Now true, it’s not a bike for interstates here. It will safely do the speeds for 5 or 10 miles or so if need be without struggling, but it’s certainly not about blowing down the super slab with your hair on fire. It’s about pure enjoyment on back lanes where scenery and the riding experience is most pleasurable and memorable. I really do love my Hunter. It never fails to make me smile when I’m riding it.
I completely understand when people say that the 350 classic is underpowered and cannot hold 70mph+ on motorways. BUT this is not the bike for those people. I spent 40 years travelling this country (UK) and others, constantly having to get places on a schedule and as a consequence at the fastest legal speeds. Travel was just that, travel. Not fun and not really interesting for the most part. The RE 350 for me, knowing its limitations means that I plan my routes using A roads, B roads and lanes with dual carriageways only occasionally. Now after buying a Classic 350 following excellent reviews such as Mr Darcy & the Ol' Man I am enjoying the journey, the scenery and making stops whenever I choose. This for me is travelling for pleasure and enjoyment, higher speeds would detract from that.
I'm happy to hear your final analysis. I'm reminded that friends of mine in Colombia and Venezuela tell me that bikes with half that displacement are the norm, and they're going up and down hills everywhere they go. I think, as you say, it depends on your expectations. Here in the States we of course expect to go fast, without any impediment, no matter anything at all. The rest of the world is not generally afforded that luxury! That being said, I just wanted to question one thing: you said in your pre-hillclimb introduction that we would notice the revs drop off in 3rd gear, but... you were in 4th. I heard you shift into 3rd at 3:37, and you stayed there past the oncoming car, and then at 3:55, you shifted into 4th. So it was in 4th gear that the revs didn't increase, but I actually didn't hear them decrease. We've all read that these REs are not very powerful on a hp-to-displacement basis, but [almost] everyone still seems to love them. They seem to have gotten a lot right. :) Thanks.
I started on one hp 49cc mopeds, and had a wonderful time. I rode my Bonneville 900cc up and down the east coast and mountains of the US, and had a wonderful time. I now have a Classic 350, a Continental 650, and my 900 Bonneville. The one I have the most wonderful time on is the Classic 350. I know what my bikes can do, and I choose the one that fits my planned trip. The Classic does it perfect to well enough.
That is the perfect stable. I’m just about to pair my classic 350 with a T100, but expect to use that only in the long distance jaunts and tours. All local riding will be with the glorious 350.
When I was a lad, my father road a BSA pre-unit 650 Spitfire, which with 40hp, was considered a superbike back then. It was perfectly adequate on U.S. roads then, and had we not all grown so hungry for power it would be just as good now.
With how the bike looks small between your legs, it looks like you have more torque in your chest than it does. First video of yours that I see, and I'm glad I see a motorcycle enthusiast that isn't all about speed and can be enthusiastic about smaller bikes 👍
I took my meteor touring 2 up around the mountain ranges of the picos in northern Spain and the Pyrenees on the French/Spain border. I thought it did extremely well up hills especially considering it was loaded to the max payload. The only two problems were overtaking slower vehicles and downhill braking when getting exuberant. I felt I was right on the limit of the brakes and a couple of times had gone past the limit and had to slow down because of the lack of brakes. It's the only time I've had that concern around all other roads the brakes were fine.
I love my hunter 350 even though it's a little underpowered and small for my size and height. 6'3" 210. Definitely struggles on hills. Rest of the time I love it.
These are some of the best level-headed real world focused bike reviews on UA-cam. Certainly been using them to decide which royal Enfield to buy in the future.
In India we take these bikes to the Himalayas via Khardungla pass and Umingla Pass in Ladakh which is the highest motorable road in the world at 19000ft above sea level where the temperature is -40 degrees celsius in winters and -20 in summers. So these are not just city bikes but you can take them wherever you want to
@@james_isaac Highway speed over here in INDIA 🇮🇳 is around 80-100kmph depending on state to state and this bike can do 100-110kmph all day long and top speed is around 120kmph.
As Hunter 350 owner, I can say this - lets be honest. More power is not about speed, it is about safety for overtaking which RE´s 350 lacking. Even for city riding, 350 is missing acceleration advantage over cars. I do understand Classic 350 - beatiful classic bike. You do not expect dynamic ride but Meteor and especially Hunter are underpowered to be practical.
I have been riding 43 years and have a Signals 350. Back to basics motorcycling and a sublime riding experience along with authentic looks. Makes you feel good !
My R1200RT does the "go fast and haul everything" duties. My RE Classic 500 is pure fun on the side roads and is just a complete grin every ride. It's just a really neat, durable, utility motorcycle for when the destination doesn't matter much, rather the experience getting there is the true purpose.
I own bikes from a 4 cylinder 1000cc to an air cooled single 125cc. I ride the 125 more than any other bike purely due to the engagement, light weight, nimbleness and what I deem as fun. There’s something by having to stay in the power band constantly. I’m really considering getting one of these 350 RE’s.
Same happens to me. Own a 900cc and a Honda Monkey. Love the Monkey because it is very nimble and enjoyable. Thinking about getting a Honda GB350S when it is available in Spain.
I understand what you are saying, I agree. I think it’s fun slipping a clutch getting the revs up going up a hill or whatever. You are surely more engaged in the engine’s operation and with practice on smaller engine bikes after a while you can do a lot of things smoothly and a passenger will be none the wiser.
Touch slow compared to my little Fantic, but it’s not an issue for me to wait a few seconds at junctions for the Meteor to catch up. It’s not that much slower and as I don’t feel rushed, I get to survey my surroundings and take in the views. Slower progress really is a lot more pleasant than the mad dashes on litre bikes I was doing 5 years ago. I used to feel I was heading out for a race, I’d get back so full of adrenaline I couldn’t sleep. Now at Meteor pace it’s just relaxing and still fun.
After a certain age, most don't care about speed, and care more about the scenery and the entertainment, which answers the question, at least for my case.
I love my classic 350 ,it is a great bike. I wanted a basic utility machine, something that I could use everyday and it fits the bill perfectly. Today's motorcycles have become toys to a certain extent,my two bikes are transport pure and simple. A lot of my friends have said that it is too underpowered for modern traffic and a 125cc machine can reach 70 plus mph. True, some can, but my 350 is not as franetic at its top end as those bikes. As for travelling hundreds of miles on a motorway, I can't think of anything more tedious on a motorbike, that's why I have a car ! Great video as always 👍
Beauty of this bike is that It does all the riding (i mean less gear changes due to enough torque) whereas this lets the rider to enjoy the scenery and the ride itself.
Love your channel gents! Really help me in deciding to switch from long time riding Vespa to Classic 350 Signals (Marsh Grey), and I already did a short road trip with my girlfriend, around 300 km, and it did just fine, regional and back roads. I live in Croatia, so we have a decent amount of hills, and I would say, for a nice 80-90 km/h ride it is great, even with passenger. It is a relaxing kind of a ride, and even if you are stuck behind the bus that drives 90-100 km/h you will probably stay behind, but you will have a good wind cover. If you approach to the Classic 350 as an "old timer" bike with new stuff (like fuel injection and ABS) then you are fine. And I said, I ride 1983. Vespa 200 ccm and I went on Vespa club road trips all around Europe just fine. When I ride Classic 350 it feels like another dimension, more comfortable, more secure ride. I am not a biker, I must admit, so anything over 100 km/h scares me a lot on motorcycle, so 350 is a perfect spot on. And it is even slower than a new Vespa GTS 300 which has 150 kg and 23.8 HP.
Where I live they all say "You need aleast 800cc to get anywhere" and some doesnt greet you if they believe your bike is less than 500cc. I have a blast on my 300cc!
@The Ol' Man: Thank you for this video. I personally love small cc motorcycles! Because you have to "work" for your speed and for your momentum. On a big cc bike you can pretty much ride as sloppy as you want and still be able to get away with it. I think a 350cc can be enough. You might experience that more power still would be usable though. And fun. That being said for me a 350cc in a classic trim is a perfect 2nd bike when you already have a modern big cc motorcycle as your 1st bike.
I have always riden bikes since 1970 250 to 1300cc for fun, touring and courier work . At 70 I recently sold my 1250 RT as due to my wife's health we no longer tour. I bought an NC 750X Honda which is a brilliant do it all tool. Thinking ahead with health and age related issues myself I also own a RE Hunter for riding in my dotage. My point is I've always enjoyed riding bikes of all types and intend doing so for as long as physically possible. You don't need 200bhp to have fun 20bhp is plenty. It's being on two wheels that matters.
I now owner the 350 meteor, why? I can't manage the bend in my false knees on the other models, just done Rallymans rally in Elland, 74 miles no issues and plenty fast enough for me
the world is different, bcos where i live in asia, even 250cc is more than enough for commuting, we use motorcycle, moped and scooter around 110-160cc everyday, we rarely hit 60mph on city riding.
we carry passenger, go on a intercity trips, going on hills and countryside with a scooter, sure bigger cc is better but the weight of the bike also rise.
I am riding daily a bike from 1958 with side valve engine and 24hp and sometimes with the sidecar on. It is fast? No, but I am enjoying it... it is not everything about power and speed.
I have a 22 Meteor 350. I have the stage 2 DNA air filter, Red Rooster de-cat exhaust, and a Fuel Ex Pro ( set on 5 with the end baffle in, 6 when it's not 😎) I can get up to 75mph fairly easily. I'm 2 people at 270 lbs. My riding consists of the country roads with some trips sticking to the 55mph state roads. I'm averaging 83 mpg. (US). Hopefully this helps answer some questions. ( 11600 miles)
Tbh I’d happily have a classic 350,think they look and sound fantastic,and I’d much prefer using the lanes than motorways,the hunter coped with that hill fine,great honest video.
Great commentary in my opinion. You’re so right that this size and form of a motorcycle is so right for a great life experience! For riding around town or from the country into town and back home on the 45-50 mph road, even a bit smaller engine is maybe ok. That kind of riding is what hooks you in the first place when you’re young, so I think you have to be correct that it will be great now too. If they get bigger, faster, more complicated, more expensive, well, that’s not the correct direction for anything of this kind. More torque solves the hill problem you mention, so if RE eventually might stroke it a tiny bit, every ft-lb helps. Or we can lose 10 kg to help the cause. The only sort of thing that can be a problem is high altitude. EFI helps avoid fussing with jets, but living in the Rockies, for example in Santa Fe New Mexico or Boulder Colorado or something like that, the town is 5000- 7000 feet above sea level and there are hills; outside of town elevation gets serious. O2 is lacking. But even there it can be ok with EFI and, maybe, a but of electronic aftermarket to help control air fuel mixture. And it was there I learned to love to ride on a Honda 50cc cub and a 90cc trail as a kid. It was fine. This RE 350 would have looked like a 1957 Buick in those days. It seems like this sort of RE 350 riding around should be encouraged. Environmentalism with a smile. All this three digit horse power stuff has a place; I have chased that magic rabbit too. But for runabout motorcycles, it really seems maybe better between 350 and maybe a few more, or so, cc’s. (Or even particular 125’s) In a single or twin it is a pretty much magic spot. And runabout is where it’s at 90% of the time. I watched this video 2ce.
Very honest and accurate review,. A Change of exhaust, DNA air filter and spark plug from Hitchcock's, they do a CAT delete exhaust pipe and you get a modest but useful increase in performance, it pulls much better. My mate has the Classic 350 and he travels all over the country on it no problem. It holds a steady 60mph all day long, a mile a minute still gets you around and it's an absolute pleasure to ride...
You’re quite right. You have to be realistic about less powerful motorcycles. I ride mostly 2 up with my wife. I do a fair few short trips with luggage on occasions. I’ve been riding for the last 40 years and have had lots of different bikes, all capable for what I wanted at the time. I now have a k1600b 719 edition. It does exactly what I need. It’s a heavy bike but very nimble when moving. Handles really well so the weight is a trade off. For me a 350 would be too small. Great review. You always tell it like it is that’s why I keep watching.
I've got a Meteor 350 and i ride it everywhere. I used to have a Honda Monkey 125 and i rode that thing everywhere too,its all about managing expectations and knowing how to use the power that you have.
Back in the 70’s I rode a Honda cb100 from Los Angeles to New York, then to South Dakota, pikes peak, Arizona, then back to Los Angeles. Never one problem. It just depends on what you are willing to put up with in order to ride!
I've been a vespa (PX) for 30 odd years and I'm finally selling up & getting a hunter. Done a test ride and it delivered everything I wanted. Looking forward to buying my RE this year.
My first bike was a Kawasaki Z 200 (17 hp maybe) in the early 80ies so I know the feeling. Took my and my mate over the Alps from Austria to Italy and back without any troubles.
I'm happy with my Signals 350, even with the occasional Interstate miles. It's a matter of riding strategy, IMO; an experienced rider will, over the years, develop different strategies for managing different riding conditions. So, although it's a great beginner motorbike, its also a motorbike that expeienced riders can enjoy under conditions that beginners might find daunting or intimidating. In the end, like all motorbikes, all the C350 variants are fast enough to kill inexperienced newbies and inattentive veterans alike.
What do you really need? I have ridden quite a few different bikes in my 21 years as a motorcyclist. From 125cc Yamaha Virago over an Yamaha R6, KTM Duke 690, Suzuki Hayabusa and now a Honda Africa Twin 1000cc. Also I took my hayabusa to the circuit and was a hobby motocross and trials rider. When it comes to Royal Enfield I test rode the Classic 500 and the Himalayan 411 (first one). Let me tell you that for riding in western countries like central EU, US or Australia, you do not need a bike with 100 hp or more. What do you want on the streets? Racing? Flexing? Here in Europe most countries do not let you ride faster than 100 km/h except on motorways / autobahn. And whoever did that for more than 30 minutes knows how boring that is. I learned on the street it is about enjoying the ride, not specs or being fast. Modern REs are cheap to buy, maintain and they have a very low consumption. Don't let the "shorter" servicing intervalls fool you, even if you do traveling with your bike. Except if you really do motorcycle trips of a few thousand km / miles a year. Then I can reccomend the Africa Twin or a GS. I was sceptical about these low hp and torque numbers but when you are sitting on a RE you do not care. It is a pure joy to ride. No electronics war, no pricing like for small cars. For me RE captures the essence of riding motorcycles. In India they ride classic 350s around everywhere. I mean EVERYWHERE, even in terrain. The Himalayan is the perfect adventure bike. Just enough power to have decent travel speed on good roads but not too much. Whoever rode offroad will agree that if it is about conquering terrain, less hp is better. If you feel the 350cc is not enough, get one of their 650cc. I am very happy with royal enfields concept. I am thinking of selling my Africa Twin and buy two REs for my wife and myself.
Some people can’t believe the terrain I have tackled on my 350 classic, it’s a great machine. Writing another chapter of my life in the dust of the mighty Himalayas
I came to the Classic 350 from much more powerful bikes. To make decent progress up hills - especially with a pillion aboard you have to think about what you're doing. In this way it's actually more engaging than simply twisting the throttle in almost any gear. The experience takes me back to my early days of riding in the 1980s. And in today's motoring environment, bikes like the RE350's are actually becoming more and more relevant.
Couldn’t agree more. I have a Ducati Scrambler for around town and back roads and it’s WAY too powerful. Wish I knew how little HP and CC I needed before getting the bike! Lol. The Hunter 350 would be PERFECT. Keep up the great content! Cheers!
My classic 350 does everything and more, often 2up with a 20kg bag strapped on as well! 3 years on the rugged roads of the Himalayas in Nepal, my ego would love a 500, but honestly the 350 pulls better than a Thai bar girl up these monstrous hills and mountains
Well, let’s just say that it goes really well in the chaos of Kathmandu as well, that low down grunt pulls you out of many situations, it’s a great little all round machine.
Exactely, it all depends upon your expectations, you can't expect a 350 to perform like a 650 or bigger.. I have found that the Meteor 350 will cruise happily at 100 Km/h (60mph) and if you take hills at speed that speed can be maintained. Fitting a touring screen improves aerodynamics and helps with maintaining cruising speed. I took my screen off and the bike struggled a bit where previously it had no problems. Figured out that my body was acting as a wind scoop. Might be an idea for the other 350 models if you don't mind how it looks, keeps the wet stuff off as well.
There is also the market for first time big bike riders to think about. When I was looking for my first big bike, I wanted something not too intimidating and manageable. Six months in with my Meteor and I’ll likely look to upgrade to a 650 in the next 6 months.
I’ve got 6 bikes in the garage and my 350 Meteor is always my go to commuter bike. Love it, it’s light, nimble and more than enough power for the commute. Agree that steep hills can be a challenge, but not a deal breaker. So definitely enough power, and the styling on all of the variants is wonderful.
I love the 350 Classic's look. I own a 500 Classic. The 350 is FAR more comfortable to me (test ride) but I kept wishing it had just 5 more horsepower. I hear that is obtainable with some simple add on mods... that makes it far more appealing.
Thanks guys ….Classic 350 is definitely enough and that’s even on faster roads around Sydney - because the ride is so satisfying - there’s a lovely sense of torque with the sound and feeling of the engine even though it’s not powerful …it’s soulful 😊
I've done quite a bit of motorway riding on my RE Himalayan - which is equally gutless. Didn't have a problem. No, you are not going to juggle with Audis at high speeds but I made very steady progress at a constant 56(ish)mph. Clearly it takes a bit longer getting places but you do get to where you are going safely and in not much longer time.
Ive just returned from a 1700km trip along the East Coast of Australia earlier this week, me on a Fatbob and my lad on his meteor, didn’t miss a beat, and he was more than happy doing his first long trip on the 350, was great fun
Mr Darcy, thank you for this clip. I ride a Classic 350 Reborn and I don't think there is any engine power that can replace the thrill and satisfaction of riding a Classic 350 on B and countryside roads. Not to mention beauty and styling.. Greetings from, Belgrade, Serbia
I ride I-95 everyday and it's great. Handles well. At 60 mph it purrs. At 70, it holds its own very well. I recommend running 65 mph and you will have no troubles.
I think the real question is: what bike can you buy today with a retro look and that 1 cylinder thump sound? To me, the RE 350s are the only answer. The new triumphs are liquid cooled and lack the sound, the Honda rebel is a 2 cylinder and so on...
Omg I just love the footage of the hill climb!!! I love the look of the Hunter and the price is sorted but I can’t want to own one with that power figure. The smallest bike I had fun on was the Husqvarna 401 Svart - similar capacity but it revved and made twice as much power. Now on my R9T I’m finding it hard to want to go back to a bike that feels like it could be bullied in some kinds of traffic and road situation.
A great summing up of these bikes. I think the Royal Enfield Meteor and Hunter are great. I have reservations about the Classic and Bullet though. They are basically just a 3D photocopy of the original 500's (which were made up until 2020) and they basically just stuck this photocopy onto a modern frame and used moulded plastic panels to make it fit this new frame. There's just far too much fakery with them. The battery isn't even inside the 'battery box' anymore. It's just a fake plastic panel now. This is just the tip of the iceberg here regarding this fakery...
Like you, I love my Classic 350 for the charm and character. I’ve considered the upgrade cam but not sure I want to do that. I worry it may detract from the inherent character that the original engine configuration has. I know what it can do and I ride within it’s limitations. As it is, it’s up to ME to get 100% out of it. I have to know exactly what it’s capable of in any scenario and it’s up to me to cooperate with the machine to make it happen. It causes me to be more immersed in the experience of the ride than on a power-house bike where all I have to do is twist it and forget it. On a bigger bike I feel I’m just along for the ride. On the 350, I feel like I’m part of the overall experience.
I was dead set on a classic 350…..but when scrolling marketplace I found a sportster 1200 for 3k and that just seemed a better bang for my buck. And I do live in the US with a 30 minute highway ride to the nearest city that I frequent so the power and capacity also seemed to make more sense
i bought one (a Hunter). It's not 21bhp though because I put a Hitchcock cam in it 🙂 It's faster now.... but, tbh, not really by much. What a fantastic bike though. The guys at RE have done such a brilliant job with these 350s.
I wonder how an old 1969 - 1972 Sprint or Aermacchi 350 would go over these days. Air cooled 350 90+ mph top speed and do just over 80 in the 1/4 mile and this was 50 years ago. It also got 70+ MPG fuel mileage. Put a modern 12 volt electrical system on it and disc brakes and it would be so much fun to ride day to day.
Had a hunter , perfect for city ,around city and rural roads , good enough for urban highways ( often busy) , but no highways , i knew that before buy . Add a silencer , who gives little more power. I just love her , single cylinder charmed me ..japaneses are definitely behind me . I discover the real ride sensation
I can't speak to the RE since I don't have one, but I find i am gravitating toward smaller cc machines. I'm not even getting elderly, I'm 39 years old and have no problems managing my 900 lb tourer, I just find that it's not necessary to have the biggest and fastest motorcycle to have a lot of fun. What I find, in fact, is that cost of operating smaller bikes is much less in tax and maintenance, and leaves more money to enjoy the experience in travel and eats.
Great review as per normal, thank you. I just bought the new Bullet 350 to a great extent based on your brilliant reviews for the Classic 350. I'm in the Cotswolds and it should be perfect for the back lanes/ B Roads which is all I'm after. Figured if it was good enough for you at your stature then it would be good enough for me at 6ft 15st. Cheers, Christian.
Awesome to hear, enjoy your Bullet 👍🏼
the only difference between classic and bullet is the crank of bullet is heavier then other bikes of royal enfield and yes no doubt bullet 350 needs extra maintenance as compared to others.
@@bibekjung7404 what is your poetry relevent with RE Hunter 350?
@@tanmayamishra6183 does new bullet have heaver crank like older version?
yes @@staypositive301
I've been riding for well over fifty years. I've road raced, I've toured. I've pretty much done it all. Loved every minute of it. Then I bought my Classic 350 and fell in love with motorcycling all over again. City riding, back lane country riding... It does it all! I took it last summer on a three day, 1100 mile tour through the canyons and mountains of Arizona and Colorado and it was a fabulous steed! Take your time and stay off the freeways and it'll will be plenty of motorcycle and you will always be happy to get on again the next morning. I've owned it now for about a year and a half and I'm NEVER disappointed in the bike!
When I first rode motorbikes a 50cc to125 cc was classed as a small bike, a 350 cc to 500cc was a mid range bike a 750 upwards was a large bike. I drove hgv on motorways for 45years at 60 mph then with tachometer 56 mph , I’m quite happy sitting at 60mph with my 350 classic on the motorway ,there is slower things than me there . Love your prog, keep up the good work.
60mph on UK motorways on a bike will put you in the maximum danger zone. Might be ok in your lorry at 100kph, but as you say it’s 56mph/90kph I believe.
I'm from the US and I think it's so interesting that people wonder if a 350 is enough as that was a pretty decent size when I started riding, back in 1972. Back then, a 650 was as big as things got (except for the Harleys which were obviously insanely large at 900 and 1200). We took trips of hundreds of miles on bikes as small as a CB-175. A bike like a CB-350 or GT-380 was considered to be a fine touring machine for two-up. I do recognize that the 55-mph national speed limit was a big help, for smaller bikes, but the bikes themselves were fine.
I rode a CL 350 Honda from Charleston S.C. to Rhode Island twice back in 72 and 73. Not one issue except the crappy weather in November. Bought it brand new in 71 for 850$ and sold it in 74 for 800 $ with 13k miles on it. The most reliable machine I have ever known.
Been riding bike in the North Texas area for almost 25 years and honestly im looking forward to stepping down to a 350. I have no desire to chase power or speed anymore. I am not interested in freeway/interstate roads either with high speeds and incompetent distracted drivers. Give me a classic 350 and the backroads around my neighborhood and county and ill be a happy camper just putting along at 40mph
I think what it's all about is enjoying the pleasure of riding. Here in South America there is a biker, Pablo Imhoff, Argentine, who is making the journey from Argentina to Alaska, and he is doing it on a Honda C-90, at the moment he is already in Guatemala.
So if the question is whether 350cc is enough, of course it is.
I've ridden for over 50 years now. I've had all sorts of bikes and some really beefy sports bikes.
Those are still out there if you need power. For me, this bike is more fun than damn near anything I've ever owned (Royal Enfield Classic 350).
If/when I feel the need in my 60's to go faster, I'll just get a 2nd bike.
Stop and smell the roses - or coffee. If that's not your thing, move on...
Ride Safe 🙏🏼
Well said, I’ve been riding for over 40 years and have had some very powerful bikes but the 2 that were the most fun to ride was my wife’s BMW F650CS and my RE Himalayan. I don’t know why people have to spend their time bashing something, if it’s not for you then move on.
i rode a royal enfield 350 electra 2001 model all over India. i did approx 25000kms on her and she never once let me down. i went from south to north. east to west. if she is capable of climbing the himalayas and navigating the sandy dunes of Rajasthan then that is more than enough. theres a reason enfield has survived so long in india. she is arduous, easy to repair, beautiful and by no means the least she purrs when she talks. nothing but love
That's very true - however the roads in the UK are NOTHING like India. Here everywhere except for back roads are packed, absolutely packed and countless HGV vehicles. Although I love the concept of the 350 it certainly presents challenges to safety in many situations
I use my classic 350 on the freeway and it's a blast. Also lots of fun dropping down a gear and overtaking on said freeway. Too many people hung up on data sheet specs rather than riding.
I have an HNTR 350. Last summer I was going in the moutain with my girlfriend in the back. A lot of motorcycle going along with us, nearly all more powerful than mine, but we reach the top of the moutain at the same time. No need to have a lot of horse power to cruise along beautiful moutain road
Those Royal Enfields are gorgeous, I sat on some yesterday in a bike shop and they are so much nicer than the videos can show, you got to see them in the flesh to appreciate how excellent they look and how extremely well built they are.
Power is good but if doing 40 mph up a hill on a more main road you'd have cars up your backside trying to force you off the road but for most people 300-500 CC is more than enough. I'm currently on a Tmax 500 and I think this is fast, more than fast enough for normal people lol.
I'd rather ride a slower bike fast than a fast bike slow.
Thank you for this great video from you... the Royal Enfield Hunter is currently the only motorcycle that combines classic elements of the 70s with the emotion of the unique single-cylinder at an affordable, reasonable price...
Of course you can't expect miracles from the small engine, but as a biker like me, I'm 50 years old, it manages to conjure up a SMILE on your face every day... wonderful
The Classic 350 is my favorite although I also love the Hunter and ride it every day. Luckily I'm in the position of having bought 3 of these great RE models...
Importantly, I would like to say THANK YOU that there are people and UA-cam pages like yours. You convey the feelings and situations so clearly that as a fan of classic motorcycles I say thank you and you make the whole thing authentic and great...
Thank you for your great reports.....
Clemens from Saarland / Germany
😎🤗👌👍👍👍👍
Hello Clemens! I am American and have an office in Wiesbaden. I have seen two of your posts now and so thought I'd say hello!
Totally agree guys
Whats the biggest selling bike of all time ?
The Honda Cub, and the biggest engine size thats ever come in is just 125cc but more have been bought as 50 and 90cc
Yet its sold over 300 million because those buying them know what they are best suited to and want them for that job.
Thanks for the honest review on the smaller Royal Enfields. I live in the Northeast US and these bikes interest me, I prefer riding the rural country roads. That 411 Scram really interest me.
I agree. I live in Houston Texas and my Meteor 350 is a great city motorcycle. However, it is wonderful on back road day trips. I agree that it's not the best on freeways but if forced to ride on one for a few exits, it will do the job just fine.
I'm 55 now . I'll be getting one of these this year . It's got more than enough power for me 👍👌
350's and 500's are awesome compromises of power and economy. Years ago I owned a 500 bullet and I was thrilled every time I rode it. I also had a Triumph 1200 bagger for big trips but that 500 was all about the simple fun. I'd ride a 350 version without complaint in they ways you've shown it in this video. Thank you for uploading this video.
Ridden many different bikes here in the UK both large and small capacity. For me the smaller cc bikes are my preference, because I don't go on motorways unless I need too and I'm not interested in racing around everywhere. My bike is my primary transport as I don't drive cars, so the fact they are mostly very economical on fuel, cheap to tax, insure, maintain and will do everything I need them too is why they are my preference. Nothing against the bigger bikes and I get why many folk like them, but they just aren't for me.
I'm 71 and I have 2 250's and a 400. I like them all. I don't drive on highways, so the smaller bikes are perfect for me. I just ride for fun and relaxation.
Agreed. I've never owned anything bigger than a 600 since '72. My adventures only last a day and I'm in no rush to get there. Sometimes it's not the number of miles, but where you do them. I have the Meteor 350 and a Honda Navi currently.
Putting a DNA filter kit on these 350s will increase power by 10%. It does work and can make all the difference on these low powered bikes. Just completed 600km trip in the mountains of British Columbia with mine. No issues.
Unless you're riding on a track, or motorways constantly, then it's more than powerful enough. Too many are obsessed with power.....
Depends from person to person, it's literally up to you and your budget what you get. I dont get this stupid debate.
Power is nice to have in reserve. A lifetime on bikes and perhaps my most fun was as a 17 year old on a 29bhp Kawasaki KH250 some many years ago.
But city riding isn’t fun, mummies in X5s will try to kill you without even thinking. For that you need agility, power, shit hot brakes and good tyres. Those mummies are still out there on country roads too taking little Jonny to private school. For that you need more power to keep away from them.
I tend to disagree. I don’t need much power either, but having a bit of a reserve is nice to have. I, for example, live in a very hilly area and overtaking a tractor or so would be almost impossible with that bike.
Also, I’m a bit disappointed with the „uniqueness“ of the engine. For me it’s not characterful enough for the lack of power. Other people might like it, because it’s quite smooth and so, but for me, if I don’t have power, I at least want to have something else going on (some more vibration and sound) to make up for it.
Probably the reason, why I have a V7 as a daily. For me it’s the perfect combination of character and uniqueness with enough power to actually use it everywhere.
There is lifting power too. If a bike struggles to maintain above 65mph on flat or rolling lowlands, then it is likely to bog horribly on steep highways and roads.
Nobody keeps a RE long near me for this reason. If you remain in the village they are perfect, but outside of the small town the most enjoyable roads climb from 1200ft to 6000ft. Maintaining 45 and 50mph is a struggle with an adult rider on this 350 and the exhaust gets very hot. Typically the bigger motor new Himalayan handles it better....but not everyone wants a dirt bike dual sport for long paved rides.
Nice bike design, and well balanced, but basically an old Rebel 250 (234cc) equivalent with 1/4 more static weight.
For most riders in most rolling country riding then it is just fine.
@@PhilbyFavouriteslittle johnny is a loser
I’ve owned many bikes and scooters, from Honda Spree’s and Elites to DRZ400s, GSXR’s, to a CBR 1100XX and my modded 100hp HD Fatboy to name a few. I seen a RE 350 Classic Signals desert sand at a dealer last week and I can’t stop thinking about going back to buy it lol
I have the Hunter 350 and a Triumph 900 scrambler plus some proper classics. For all my local riding, back road scratching and the like, I much prefer the little Hunter 350, definitely has enough power to be FUN!!
My motorway days are over, furthermore, I very rarely travel on major A class roads. I live in the Yorkshire Dales, and ride the Dales roads all the time, with an occasional foray into the Lake district, and the Scottish borders. The 350 Bullet is perfect for the kind of roads I ride, and I have no need for speed. Speed is for folk who have no patience, or are in a rush. Enjoying motorcycling, and marveling at the fabulous vistas on offer to this 77 year old is what I am looking for.
I have a 2022 classic 350. I had it for about a year and a half and coming up on 4500 miles. The bottom line is just that: here in the US if you want to ride on the highway, yes, you would need a more powerful bike unless you want to be holding on for dear life at 65 or 70. I do a lot of city and back road riding here in Seattle and a bit on the Olympic Peninsula. It’s perfect for that. It’s not bad that it gets 85+ miles to the gallon as well. handling is fantastic. Very agile.If speed is not your thing. I would highly recommend it. Cheers from the Pacific Northwest!
I’m new to the Classic 350 (love it!), the only tricky part with this engine / its power is the run-in period. If you follow RE’s guidelines / rev limits, it’s hard to pull hills without angering drivers behind you (and where I live hills are hard to avoid). And the run-in period is a good 1000 miles, where at that point the engine really comes to life and opens up from what everyone says.
I’ve had fast bikes. They’re awesome. But honestly, not sure why, I’m having way more fun on this 350 lately.
Strange how that happens, one of my mates has had all sorts of bikes , at the moment he's got a Honda Shadow 750 cruiser , lovely condition and very smooth, he has two classic B S A s an ( A7 ) & an ( A6 ) he bought a classic 350cc Royal Enfield last year and he loves it , like you say its really all about what puts a smile on your face 😀.
My Honda 650 seems to sit in the garage a lot these days since buying a Hunter as my every day work horse.
I did take it for a 200 mile trip not so long ago, just to see how it worked out motorway riding, & it seemed to hold out quite well, although overtakes had to be planned well in advance.
Shalln't lie to you though - it really could do with an extra 5HP.
Sensible review! A 350 (in my case an AJS Model 8) has all the performance needed for more than 95% of the riding I do and doesn't burn more petrol than necessary. I imagine these RE machines would fit the needs of most people riding in a suburban environment.
It's got enough power. It's not as if there are not a million other bikes for those that say "If only it had another X hp". I'm currently riding a 950 cruiser but often bitterly regret selling my 125 VanVan, I think you've got to be open minded & be prepared to adapt, if you are then these RE 350's look immense fun.
I use my meteor 350 daily and its just shy of 17,000 miles. I've never bothered with the valves and do the oil changes myself. Its been fantastic and has never let me down, it never gets cleaned and lives a fairly tough life especially starting as an ex demo. Ive been on long tours and it goes down the motorway everyday, im often in the outside lane but simply come back to the inside lane when things move at a higher pace. I think the obsession with power is ridiculous, Royal Enfield have never made high powered motorcycles. A sub 4 thousand bike out the factory is what it is, theres always the choice to buy a sportsbike etc but lets face it most of those just end up poodling to the local cafe in the summer for a tea
The 350 series of motorbikes by Royal Enfield have enough power for having fun. For enjoying the ride. For stopping not only to smell the roses but to have a hot fudge sundae with whipped cream, nuts and a cherry on top and a glass of iced tea.
In other words, Royal Enfield's 350s have a reasonable amount of power to get you "there and back again". And by "there" I do mean the memories of days long past and by "back" I do mean "home". And "again" means over and over. There's a kid inside each of us and it only takes a certain smell, sound or scenery for that kid to surface and remind us that no one dies alone so long as they have a lifetime of memories within them.
A Royal Enfield 350 is perfect for jump starting the kid in you.
SS
I'm in Melbourne, Aus & started with a Honda Grom (cool, but limited application as wasn't very stable after 80km/h). Then bought a Honda CB500X to get into a bigger bike, but didn't gel with it; it was like a two wheeled 4x4 & I realised I wasn't going to tour on it. Next bought an RE 350 Classic Reborn in gunmetal & love it. Has so much charm, peppy in the suburbs & just feels as though it's your friend & will look after you. Yes, I was also concerned about the weight/power, but it goes far better than you'd think.
No no no! You won’t be left behind because you can use all of the power on the roads! Also, if you fit the DNA filter and intake, Hitchcock’s stainless steel free flow exhaust system and FuelX lite, you will undo most of the euro 5 nonsense and unlock most of the engines potential. I’m now getting ready to fit the Kent cam to my Classic, which should get me up to 24 or 25 hp at the wheel. This is much closer to what the designer of the engine had in mind before the bureaucrats got involved. Bullet 500 performance from a 350! Just as it should be. Having said that, these bikes are great, out of the crate. It’s just that in my 48th year of riding I can’t bring myself not to tinker and improve my ride… btw, 70mph all day long, no problem, even stock.
I suspect the 350 is choked by engine mapping, for longevity and emissions. An overhead valve 350 should be capable of higher speeds, but that's kind of missing the point and other bikes are available if speed's a priority. Other tweaks will squeeze a few more bhp out of the thing.
@@borderlands6606 tinkering and tweaking is half the fun!
@@borderlands6606 the J platform engine is an overhead cam engine, and was originally intended to be capable of 90mph, which is well within the design capabilities. It was restricted with a speed limiter that works off the ABS ring and ECU. This was done to satisfy insurance regulators in the Asian market. My information comes from Hitchcock’s, who in turn had the information from sources involved with testing the Hunter prototypes. The only thing we can’t fix yet, is this speed limiter, but I suspect somebody will find a way before long. There is a rumour that the Hunter ECU does not have a speed limiter, but as yet I have no solid proof of this, but there are people looking into this.
@@TheNorfolkThunderbolt Yes, I agree with all that, and always thought the J-platform would make an inexpensive club racing class if someone could unlock the ecu. A Classic with clip-ons, rear sets and a racing tank would be a head turner. Then a racing cam and improved breathing would make for a fast little bike.
@@borderlands6606 well, you never know what might happen in the future! Maybe some enterprising people might do just that. It would be a marvellous thing!
Another excellent, honest review. All I can say is that I've gone from a fast 120bhp bike to one just under 30 bhp. Of course the smaller bike is slower, but enjoy the back roads so much more now not having to hold back constantly and dodging the potholes and getting stuck behind car's anyway...
I Know where youre coming from in terms of powerful bikes often being tremendously frustrating on British roads , due to our abysmal roads, poor standards of driving, congestion, speed cameras, lousy weather etc., etc...
Just about to head off to Spain and ride up the length of France to Normandy on my classic 350. For the roads were travelling on it’ll be just fine. It’s already done John O’ Groats to Lands End, including riding to JOG from Devon to start and a tour of Brittany last year.
Go slow, enjoy the journey and take your time. Simples.
Awesome have a great ride 👍🏼
As a matter of personal reference, I spent about a week in the Blue Ridge Mountains in North Carolina late last year with my brother on his Himmy, and me on my Hunter 350 doing some moto camping, and traversing the mountain roads and routes with absolutely no problem whatsoever going up any grade, and cornering, which was it’s strong suite. At no point in time did I feel like I needed more power to tackle those roads. As a matter of fact, more power would only have gotten me into trouble I’m afraid. Now true, it’s not a bike for interstates here. It will safely do the speeds for 5 or 10 miles or so if need be without struggling, but it’s certainly not about blowing down the super slab with your hair on fire. It’s about pure enjoyment on back lanes where scenery and the riding experience is most pleasurable and memorable. I really do love my Hunter. It never fails to make me smile when I’m riding it.
I completely understand when people say that the 350 classic is underpowered and cannot hold 70mph+ on motorways. BUT this is not the bike for those people.
I spent 40 years travelling this country (UK) and others, constantly having to get places on a schedule and as a consequence at the fastest legal speeds. Travel was just that, travel. Not fun and not really interesting for the most part.
The RE 350 for me, knowing its limitations means that I plan my routes using A roads, B roads and lanes with dual carriageways only occasionally. Now after buying a Classic 350 following excellent reviews such as Mr Darcy & the Ol' Man I am enjoying the journey, the scenery and making stops whenever I choose. This for me is travelling for pleasure and enjoyment, higher speeds would detract from that.
I'm happy to hear your final analysis. I'm reminded that friends of mine in Colombia and Venezuela tell me that bikes with half that displacement are the norm, and they're going up and down hills everywhere they go. I think, as you say, it depends on your expectations. Here in the States we of course expect to go fast, without any impediment, no matter anything at all. The rest of the world is not generally afforded that luxury!
That being said, I just wanted to question one thing: you said in your pre-hillclimb introduction that we would notice the revs drop off in 3rd gear, but... you were in 4th. I heard you shift into 3rd at 3:37, and you stayed there past the oncoming car, and then at 3:55, you shifted into 4th. So it was in 4th gear that the revs didn't increase, but I actually didn't hear them decrease.
We've all read that these REs are not very powerful on a hp-to-displacement basis, but [almost] everyone still seems to love them. They seem to have gotten a lot right. :) Thanks.
I started on one hp 49cc mopeds, and had a wonderful time. I rode my Bonneville 900cc up and down the east coast and mountains of the US, and had a wonderful time. I now have a Classic 350, a Continental 650, and my 900 Bonneville. The one I have the most wonderful time on is the Classic 350. I know what my bikes can do, and I choose the one that fits my planned trip. The Classic does it perfect to well enough.
That is the perfect stable. I’m just about to pair my classic 350 with a T100, but expect to use that only in the long distance jaunts and tours. All local riding will be with the glorious 350.
of course it's enough, you get from A to B, humble on fuel, for rural and small towns navigations - superb, for cities - superb.
When I was a lad, my father road a BSA pre-unit 650 Spitfire, which with 40hp, was considered a superbike back then. It was perfectly adequate on U.S. roads then, and had we not all grown so hungry for power it would be just as good now.
With how the bike looks small between your legs, it looks like you have more torque in your chest than it does.
First video of yours that I see, and I'm glad I see a motorcycle enthusiast that isn't all about speed and can be enthusiastic about smaller bikes 👍
I took my meteor touring 2 up around the mountain ranges of the picos in northern Spain and the Pyrenees on the French/Spain border. I thought it did extremely well up hills especially considering it was loaded to the max payload. The only two problems were overtaking slower vehicles and downhill braking when getting exuberant. I felt I was right on the limit of the brakes and a couple of times had gone past the limit and had to slow down because of the lack of brakes. It's the only time I've had that concern around all other roads the brakes were fine.
I love my hunter 350 even though it's a little underpowered and small for my size and height. 6'3" 210. Definitely struggles on hills. Rest of the time I love it.
These are some of the best level-headed real world focused bike reviews on UA-cam. Certainly been using them to decide which royal Enfield to buy in the future.
Thank you 😊
In India we take these bikes to the Himalayas via Khardungla pass and Umingla Pass in Ladakh which is the highest motorable road in the world at 19000ft above sea level where the temperature is -40 degrees celsius in winters and -20 in summers.
So these are not just city bikes but you can take them wherever you want to
You can't maintain the minimum high way speed with these 350's
@@james_isaac Highway speed over here in INDIA 🇮🇳 is around 80-100kmph depending on state to state and this bike can do 100-110kmph all day long and top speed is around 120kmph.
@@AnindyaMukherjeeTheGamer i know that but in European countries minimum high way speed is 75 mph /120
RE=Junk
As Hunter 350 owner, I can say this - lets be honest. More power is not about speed, it is about safety for overtaking which RE´s 350 lacking. Even for city riding, 350 is missing acceleration advantage over cars. I do understand Classic 350 - beatiful classic bike. You do not expect dynamic ride but Meteor and especially Hunter are underpowered to be practical.
This!
I have been riding 43 years and have a Signals 350. Back to basics motorcycling and a sublime riding experience along with authentic looks. Makes you feel good !
Look...it's simple. If you are riding with others who have much bigger bikes you simply can't keep up. Alone? You can always keep up with yourself.
My R1200RT does the "go fast and haul everything" duties. My RE Classic 500 is pure fun on the side roads and is just a complete grin every ride. It's just a really neat, durable, utility motorcycle for when the destination doesn't matter much, rather the experience getting there is the true purpose.
I own bikes from a 4 cylinder 1000cc to an air cooled single 125cc. I ride the 125 more than any other bike purely due to the engagement, light weight, nimbleness and what I deem as fun. There’s something by having to stay in the power band constantly. I’m really considering getting one of these 350 RE’s.
Same happens to me. Own a 900cc and a Honda Monkey. Love the Monkey because it is very nimble and enjoyable. Thinking about getting a Honda GB350S when it is available in Spain.
I understand what you are saying, I agree. I think it’s fun slipping a clutch getting the revs up going up a hill or whatever. You are surely more engaged in the engine’s operation and with practice on smaller engine bikes after a while you can do a lot of things smoothly and a passenger will be none the wiser.
Touch slow compared to my little Fantic, but it’s not an issue for me to wait a few seconds at junctions for the Meteor to catch up. It’s not that much slower and as I don’t feel rushed, I get to survey my surroundings and take in the views. Slower progress really is a lot more pleasant than the mad dashes on litre bikes I was doing 5 years ago. I used to feel I was heading out for a race, I’d get back so full of adrenaline I couldn’t sleep. Now at Meteor pace it’s just relaxing and still fun.
After a certain age, most don't care about speed, and care more about the scenery and the entertainment, which answers the question, at least for my case.
YO - Just the comment i came here for..
I love my classic 350 ,it is a great bike. I wanted a basic utility machine, something that I could use everyday and it fits the bill perfectly. Today's motorcycles have become toys to a certain extent,my two bikes are transport pure and simple. A lot of my friends have said that it is too underpowered for modern traffic and a 125cc machine can reach 70 plus mph. True, some can, but my 350 is not as franetic at its top end as those bikes. As for travelling hundreds of miles on a motorway, I can't think of anything more tedious on a motorbike, that's why I have a car ! Great video as always 👍
Beauty of this bike is that It does all the riding (i mean less gear changes due to enough torque) whereas this lets the rider to enjoy the scenery and the ride itself.
Love your channel gents! Really help me in deciding to switch from long time riding Vespa to Classic 350 Signals (Marsh Grey), and I already did a short road trip with my girlfriend, around 300 km, and it did just fine, regional and back roads. I live in Croatia, so we have a decent amount of hills, and I would say, for a nice 80-90 km/h ride it is great, even with passenger. It is a relaxing kind of a ride, and even if you are stuck behind the bus that drives 90-100 km/h you will probably stay behind, but you will have a good wind cover.
If you approach to the Classic 350 as an "old timer" bike with new stuff (like fuel injection and ABS) then you are fine. And I said, I ride 1983. Vespa 200 ccm and I went on Vespa club road trips all around Europe just fine. When I ride Classic 350 it feels like another dimension, more comfortable, more secure ride. I am not a biker, I must admit, so anything over 100 km/h scares me a lot on motorcycle, so 350 is a perfect spot on. And it is even slower than a new Vespa GTS 300 which has 150 kg and 23.8 HP.
Great to hear 👍🏼
Where I live they all say "You need aleast 800cc to get anywhere" and some doesnt greet you if they believe your bike is less than 500cc. I have a blast on my 300cc!
@The Ol' Man: Thank you for this video.
I personally love small cc motorcycles!
Because you have to "work" for your speed and for your momentum. On a big cc bike you can pretty much ride as sloppy as you want and still be able to get away with it.
I think a 350cc can be enough. You might experience that more power still would be usable though. And fun.
That being said for me a 350cc in a classic trim is a perfect 2nd bike when you already have a modern big cc motorcycle as your 1st bike.
I have always riden bikes since 1970 250 to 1300cc for fun, touring and courier work . At 70 I recently sold my 1250 RT as due to my wife's health we no longer tour. I bought an NC 750X Honda which is a brilliant do it all tool. Thinking ahead with health and age related issues myself I also own a RE Hunter for riding in my dotage. My point is I've always enjoyed riding bikes of all types and intend doing so for as long as physically possible.
You don't need 200bhp to have fun 20bhp is plenty. It's being on two wheels that matters.
I now owner the 350 meteor, why? I can't manage the bend in my false knees on the other models, just done Rallymans rally in Elland, 74 miles no issues and plenty fast enough for me
I love the style and simple elegance of the bike.
the world is different, bcos where i live in asia, even 250cc is more than enough for commuting, we use motorcycle, moped and scooter around 110-160cc everyday, we rarely hit 60mph on city riding.
we carry passenger, go on a intercity trips, going on hills and countryside with a scooter, sure bigger cc is better but the weight of the bike also rise.
I am riding daily a bike from 1958 with side valve engine and 24hp and sometimes with the sidecar on. It is fast? No, but I am enjoying it... it is not everything about power and speed.
I have a 22 Meteor 350. I have the stage 2 DNA air filter, Red Rooster de-cat exhaust, and a Fuel Ex Pro ( set on 5 with the end baffle in, 6 when it's not 😎) I can get up to 75mph fairly easily. I'm 2 people at 270 lbs. My riding consists of the country roads with some trips sticking to the 55mph state roads. I'm averaging 83 mpg. (US). Hopefully this helps answer some questions. ( 11600 miles)
Tbh I’d happily have a classic 350,think they look and sound fantastic,and I’d much prefer using the lanes than motorways,the hunter coped with that hill fine,great honest video.
Great commentary in my opinion. You’re so right that this size and form of a motorcycle is so right for a great life experience! For riding around town or from the country into town and back home on the 45-50 mph road, even a bit smaller engine is maybe ok. That kind of riding is what hooks you in the first place when you’re young, so I think you have to be correct that it will be great now too. If they get bigger, faster, more complicated, more expensive, well, that’s not the correct direction for anything of this kind. More torque solves the hill problem you mention, so if RE eventually might stroke it a tiny bit, every ft-lb helps. Or we can lose 10 kg to help the cause. The only sort of thing that can be a problem is high altitude. EFI helps avoid fussing with jets, but living in the Rockies, for example in Santa Fe New Mexico or Boulder Colorado or something like that, the town is 5000- 7000 feet above sea level and there are hills; outside of town elevation gets serious. O2 is lacking. But even there it can be ok with EFI and, maybe, a but of electronic aftermarket to help control air fuel mixture. And it was there I learned to love to ride on a Honda 50cc cub and a 90cc trail as a kid. It was fine. This RE 350 would have looked like a 1957 Buick in those days. It seems like this sort of RE 350 riding around should be encouraged. Environmentalism with a smile. All this three digit horse power stuff has a place; I have chased that magic rabbit too. But for runabout motorcycles, it really seems maybe better between 350 and maybe a few more, or so, cc’s. (Or even particular 125’s) In a single or twin it is a pretty much magic spot. And runabout is where it’s at 90% of the time. I watched this video 2ce.
Very honest and accurate review,. A Change of exhaust, DNA air filter and spark plug from Hitchcock's, they do a CAT delete exhaust pipe and you get a modest but useful increase in performance, it pulls much better. My mate has the Classic 350 and he travels all over the country on it no problem. It holds a steady 60mph all day long, a mile a minute still gets you around and it's an absolute pleasure to ride...
or you could just get either a lighter or more powerful bike lmao
The first bike I purchased was the Bullet 350. Been 5 years for mine, a century for the name.
You’re quite right. You have to be realistic about less powerful motorcycles. I ride mostly 2 up with my wife. I do a fair few short trips with luggage on occasions. I’ve been riding for the last 40 years and have had lots of different bikes, all capable for what I wanted at the time. I now have a k1600b 719 edition. It does exactly what I need. It’s a heavy bike but very nimble when moving. Handles really well so the weight is a trade off. For me a 350 would be too small. Great review. You always tell it like it is that’s why I keep watching.
Great to hear 👍🏼
I've got a Meteor 350 and i ride it everywhere. I used to have a Honda Monkey 125 and i rode that thing everywhere too,its all about managing expectations and knowing how to use the power that you have.
great video showing the limitations of these bikes not too many posting this kinda content. Still amazing machines that fill a role for riders.
Back in the 70’s I rode a Honda cb100 from Los Angeles to New York, then to South Dakota, pikes peak, Arizona, then back to Los Angeles. Never one problem. It just depends on what you are willing to put up with in order to ride!
I've been a vespa (PX) for 30 odd years and I'm finally selling up & getting a hunter. Done a test ride and it delivered everything I wanted. Looking forward to buying my RE this year.
My first bike was a Kawasaki Z 200 (17 hp maybe) in the early 80ies so I know the feeling. Took my and my mate over the Alps from Austria to Italy and back without any troubles.
I bought Classic 350 stealth black 8 months back. Im absolutely loving the ride quality and experience
I'm happy with my Signals 350, even with the occasional Interstate miles. It's a matter of riding strategy, IMO; an experienced rider will, over the years, develop different strategies for managing different riding conditions. So, although it's a great beginner motorbike, its also a motorbike that expeienced riders can enjoy under conditions that beginners might find daunting or intimidating. In the end, like all motorbikes, all the C350 variants are fast enough to kill inexperienced newbies and inattentive veterans alike.
Well said! I’m thinking about an RE 350 myself. I’m 67 and just sold my ‘04 Fatboy (which I loved, due to moving).
What do you really need?
I have ridden quite a few different bikes in my 21 years as a motorcyclist. From 125cc Yamaha Virago over an Yamaha R6, KTM Duke 690, Suzuki Hayabusa and now a Honda Africa Twin 1000cc. Also I took my hayabusa to the circuit and was a hobby motocross and trials rider.
When it comes to Royal Enfield I test rode the Classic 500 and the Himalayan 411 (first one).
Let me tell you that for riding in western countries like central EU, US or Australia, you do not need a bike with 100 hp or more. What do you want on the streets? Racing? Flexing? Here in Europe most countries do not let you ride faster than 100 km/h except on motorways / autobahn. And whoever did that for more than 30 minutes knows how boring that is.
I learned on the street it is about enjoying the ride, not specs or being fast.
Modern REs are cheap to buy, maintain and they have a very low consumption. Don't let the "shorter" servicing intervalls fool you, even if you do traveling with your bike. Except if you really do motorcycle trips of a few thousand km / miles a year. Then I can reccomend the Africa Twin or a GS.
I was sceptical about these low hp and torque numbers but when you are sitting on a RE you do not care. It is a pure joy to ride. No electronics war, no pricing like for small cars. For me RE captures the essence of riding motorcycles.
In India they ride classic 350s around everywhere. I mean EVERYWHERE, even in terrain. The Himalayan is the perfect adventure bike. Just enough power to have decent travel speed on good roads but not too much. Whoever rode offroad will agree that if it is about conquering terrain, less hp is better.
If you feel the 350cc is not enough, get one of their 650cc.
I am very happy with royal enfields concept. I am thinking of selling my Africa Twin and buy two REs for my wife and myself.
Some people can’t believe the terrain I have tackled on my 350 classic, it’s a great machine. Writing another chapter of my life in the dust of the mighty Himalayas
I came to the Classic 350 from much more powerful bikes. To make decent progress up hills - especially with a pillion aboard you have to think about what you're doing. In this way it's actually more engaging than simply twisting the throttle in almost any gear. The experience takes me back to my early days of riding in the 1980s. And in today's motoring environment, bikes like the RE350's are actually becoming more and more relevant.
Couldn’t agree more. I have a Ducati Scrambler for around town and back roads and it’s WAY too powerful. Wish I knew how little HP and CC I needed before getting the bike! Lol. The Hunter 350 would be PERFECT.
Keep up the great content! Cheers!
Many thanks 😊
My classic 350 does everything and more, often 2up with a 20kg bag strapped on as well! 3 years on the rugged roads of the Himalayas in Nepal, my ego would love a 500, but honestly the 350 pulls better than a Thai bar girl up these monstrous hills and mountains
Well, let’s just say that it goes really well in the chaos of Kathmandu as well, that low down grunt pulls you out of many situations, it’s a great little all round machine.
Exactely, it all depends upon your expectations, you can't expect a 350 to perform like a 650 or bigger.. I have found that the Meteor 350 will cruise happily at 100 Km/h (60mph) and if you take hills at speed that speed can be maintained. Fitting a touring screen improves aerodynamics and helps with maintaining cruising speed. I took my screen off and the bike struggled a bit where previously it had no problems. Figured out that my body was acting as a wind scoop. Might be an idea for the other 350 models if you don't mind how it looks, keeps the wet stuff off as well.
There is also the market for first time big bike riders to think about. When I was looking for my first big bike, I wanted something not too intimidating and manageable. Six months in with my Meteor and I’ll likely look to upgrade to a 650 in the next 6 months.
I’ve got 6 bikes in the garage and my 350 Meteor is always my go to commuter bike. Love it, it’s light, nimble and more than enough power for the commute. Agree that steep hills can be a challenge, but not a deal breaker. So definitely enough power, and the styling on all of the variants is wonderful.
I love the 350 Classic's look. I own a 500 Classic. The 350 is FAR more comfortable to me (test ride) but I kept wishing it had just 5 more horsepower. I hear that is obtainable with some simple add on mods... that makes it far more appealing.
Hitchcock's cam gives you 5 hp at the wheel. Made a huge difference on my Classic.
Thanks guys ….Classic 350 is definitely enough and that’s even on faster roads around Sydney - because the ride is so satisfying - there’s a lovely sense of torque with the sound and feeling of the engine even though it’s not powerful …it’s soulful 😊
I've done quite a bit of motorway riding on my RE Himalayan - which is equally gutless. Didn't have a problem. No, you are not going to juggle with Audis at high speeds but I made very steady progress at a constant 56(ish)mph. Clearly it takes a bit longer getting places but you do get to where you are going safely and in not much longer time.
Ive just returned from a 1700km trip along the East Coast of Australia earlier this week, me on a Fatbob and my lad on his meteor, didn’t miss a beat, and he was more than happy doing his first long trip on the 350, was great fun
My first street bike was a 400CC Honda Hawk I rode it all over Hawaii/Ohau for 3 years. It was plenty big enough.
Mr Darcy, thank you for this clip. I ride a Classic 350 Reborn and I don't think there is any engine power that can replace the thrill and satisfaction of riding a Classic 350 on B and countryside roads. Not to mention beauty and styling.. Greetings from, Belgrade, Serbia
I ride I-95 everyday and it's great. Handles well. At 60 mph it purrs. At 70, it holds its own very well. I recommend running 65 mph and you will have no troubles.
I think the real question is: what bike can you buy today with a retro look and that 1 cylinder thump sound? To me, the RE 350s are the only answer. The new triumphs are liquid cooled and lack the sound, the Honda rebel is a 2 cylinder and so on...
Omg I just love the footage of the hill climb!!! I love the look of the Hunter and the price is sorted but I can’t want to own one with that power figure. The smallest bike I had fun on was the Husqvarna 401 Svart - similar capacity but it revved and made twice as much power. Now on my R9T I’m finding it hard to want to go back to a bike that feels like it could be bullied in some kinds of traffic and road situation.
A great summing up of these bikes. I think the Royal Enfield Meteor and Hunter are great. I have reservations about the Classic and Bullet though. They are basically just a 3D photocopy of the original 500's (which were made up until 2020) and they basically just stuck this photocopy onto a modern frame and used moulded plastic panels to make it fit this new frame. There's just far too much fakery with them. The battery isn't even inside the 'battery box' anymore. It's just a fake plastic panel now. This is just the tip of the iceberg here regarding this fakery...
Like you, I love my Classic 350 for the charm and character. I’ve considered the upgrade cam but not sure I want to do that. I worry it may detract from the inherent character that the original engine configuration has. I know what it can do and I ride within it’s limitations. As it is, it’s up to ME to get 100% out of it. I have to know exactly what it’s capable of in any scenario and it’s up to me to cooperate with the machine to make it happen. It causes me to be more immersed in the experience of the ride than on a power-house bike where all I have to do is twist it and forget it. On a bigger bike I feel I’m just along for the ride. On the 350, I feel like I’m part of the overall experience.
I was dead set on a classic 350…..but when scrolling marketplace I found a sportster 1200 for 3k and that just seemed a better bang for my buck. And I do live in the US with a 30 minute highway ride to the nearest city that I frequent so the power and capacity also seemed to make more sense
i bought one (a Hunter). It's not 21bhp though because I put a Hitchcock cam in it 🙂 It's faster now.... but, tbh, not really by much. What a fantastic bike though. The guys at RE have done such a brilliant job with these 350s.
I wonder how an old 1969 - 1972 Sprint or Aermacchi 350 would go over these days. Air cooled 350 90+ mph top speed and do just over 80 in the 1/4 mile and this was 50 years ago. It also got 70+ MPG fuel mileage. Put a modern 12 volt electrical system on it and disc brakes and it would be so much fun to ride day to day.
Had a hunter , perfect for city ,around city and rural roads , good enough for urban highways ( often busy) , but no highways , i knew that before buy . Add a silencer , who gives little more power. I just love her , single cylinder charmed me ..japaneses are definitely behind me . I discover the real ride sensation
They sound amazing and 350 is a very serious contender. In Cornwall with all the hills a 500/600 it’s a very interesting dilemma
I can't speak to the RE since I don't have one, but I find i am gravitating toward smaller cc machines. I'm not even getting elderly, I'm 39 years old and have no problems managing my 900 lb tourer, I just find that it's not necessary to have the biggest and fastest motorcycle to have a lot of fun. What I find, in fact, is that cost of operating smaller bikes is much less in tax and maintenance, and leaves more money to enjoy the experience in travel and eats.