SINGLE PHASE TRANSFORMER : EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT AND WORKING

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лют 2025
  • Steps to drawing the Equivalent circuit diagram for a single phase transformer. Working explained in an animated video.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 112

  • @sadafambreen6118
    @sadafambreen6118 3 роки тому +5

    As a student this was probably the best explanation I've cm across🥺 . Thanks a lot, keep posting more such videos on other topics and keep helping students. You're doing a great job.

  • @ohgoditsjames94
    @ohgoditsjames94 3 роки тому +3

    Excellent video, the summary at the end of the video made this a lot easier to understand, cheers

  • @ajgio
    @ajgio 3 роки тому +1

    The best explanation of a transformer I've ever seen.

  • @Santoshkumar19016
    @Santoshkumar19016 5 років тому +5

    This channel should have crossed more than million subscribers for the quality of content

  • @tigistmisganaw1532
    @tigistmisganaw1532 4 роки тому +2

    No words to explain you are the best!

  • @natefield420
    @natefield420 3 роки тому +1

    Fantastic explanations and diagrams / animations. Well done!

  • @crazysoundspack3529
    @crazysoundspack3529 3 роки тому +2

    Nicely explain and the diagrams used are exceptional

  • @nafisshahidfahim7218
    @nafisshahidfahim7218 5 років тому

    Bhai you are the best.Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩

  • @Andrei-ds8qv
    @Andrei-ds8qv 6 років тому +8

    thanx a lot Xplanator, you Xplained this very welll

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  6 років тому

      Thank you so much, do check out the other videos in the playlist.

    • @damjantasevski5769
      @damjantasevski5769 4 роки тому

      @@Xplanator Oh, yeah surely I will check them all, I have an exam tomorrow.

  • @aniksheikh902
    @aniksheikh902 5 років тому +2

    Thank you so much brother!
    The explanation was so simple but very very very helpful. Make more videos. Best wishes! 👍

  • @Arnab913
    @Arnab913 6 років тому +6

    Best explanation ever! love

  • @reubennakushowa8586
    @reubennakushowa8586 2 роки тому

    I have loved your explanations makes sense

  • @rohitrahul1762
    @rohitrahul1762 4 роки тому

    Really very simple n creative...

  • @potencializadordeenergiagr7551
    @potencializadordeenergiagr7551 7 років тому +6

    I'm from Brazil, despite the language I found its explanation magnificent.
    very detailed, in relation to the
    I2 '= k.I2 first time I see and I lacked this to understand, my congratulations, sorry if I am wrong, it seems that it is from India.

    • @naturist3020
      @naturist3020 6 років тому +1

      u r right it is from india.

  • @sonnetonytony8492
    @sonnetonytony8492 4 роки тому

    thanks alot xplanator i really understood .
    God bless you
    ]]]

  • @rajlaxmiprajapati469
    @rajlaxmiprajapati469 4 роки тому

    I was so confused in this topic and finally get the the clarity on doubs thanks really simple and understandable explanation.

  • @siddheshkulkarni6129
    @siddheshkulkarni6129 4 роки тому

    Thanks a lot man
    Very well explained

  • @naturist3020
    @naturist3020 6 років тому +4

    very well explained bro

  • @mayankmaloo6893
    @mayankmaloo6893 3 роки тому

    Beautiful explaination

  • @sudeepkumar-el3cv
    @sudeepkumar-el3cv 4 роки тому

    Excellent work

  • @Jaya.M78
    @Jaya.M78 4 роки тому

    Excellent explanation!

  • @rushikeshchavan8963
    @rushikeshchavan8963 5 років тому +1

    Legendary explanation...ty

  • @chiramana_
    @chiramana_ 2 місяці тому

    Thanks a lot!!!! 🙏🙏

  • @ruchikanandghaye9773
    @ruchikanandghaye9773 6 років тому +1

    Gr8 explanation sir, thank u ☺️

  • @neethi_t
    @neethi_t 4 роки тому

    Great explanation

  • @vasanthakumar1991
    @vasanthakumar1991 5 років тому

    Seriously you opened my eye and gave the clear idea on how it works... I have a doubt. Why do we say i1=k*i2??

  • @anjalibachani9665
    @anjalibachani9665 6 років тому

    It's really very helpful... 😃😃

  • @vyashas4483
    @vyashas4483 5 років тому

    good job buddy . you explained it very well.

  • @ketaksingh5465
    @ketaksingh5465 9 місяців тому

    ❤ awesome

  • @aloknegi7923
    @aloknegi7923 7 років тому +6

    Nice explanation buddy

  • @shehab1798
    @shehab1798 6 років тому +1

    awesome.. easily explained

  • @baldovincadenamejia244
    @baldovincadenamejia244 Рік тому

    Amazing video! If it had subtitles that would perfect

  • @GPSCClassbymoin
    @GPSCClassbymoin 4 роки тому

    Gud explanation

  • @swakathumamakeshwaran8881
    @swakathumamakeshwaran8881 5 років тому

    Just one word GREAT

  • @animeshjhawar2658
    @animeshjhawar2658 3 роки тому

    Thank you Man!!!

  • @osamaahmad3756
    @osamaahmad3756 6 років тому

    Wonderful explanation, thanks.

  • @4supervic4
    @4supervic4 4 роки тому

    Very nice video! ty

  • @kaursingh637
    @kaursingh637 Рік тому

    thank u for excellent lecture - please name one book

  • @leespearz
    @leespearz 3 роки тому +1

    You saved me ♡

  • @shubhankarmaitra4231
    @shubhankarmaitra4231 3 роки тому

    thank you so much

  • @lukeangel1974
    @lukeangel1974 4 роки тому

    Good video. 5 stars from me.

  • @skysolarpowertech4147
    @skysolarpowertech4147 6 років тому

    nice explanation...Thank You!!

  • @surajshaw2344
    @surajshaw2344 5 років тому +5

    Sir I have a confusion u said lenz law but didn’t follow it the polarity must be opposite to oppose the voltage applied and u have put the same polarity everywhere why?

    • @chandantyagix
      @chandantyagix 4 роки тому

      The Polarity is indeed opposite think of the batteries sign instead of + - you wil realize

  • @sindhu283
    @sindhu283 3 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @hrishabhchoudhary5091
    @hrishabhchoudhary5091 4 роки тому

    Beautiful.

  • @payalrajpoot1730
    @payalrajpoot1730 6 років тому +1

    Very very helpful
    😍😋😋😋😋

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  6 років тому

      Thank you! Do check out other videos in th series :)

  • @alifkhandakar9818
    @alifkhandakar9818 4 роки тому

    wow , what a explanation

  • @287MdSahil
    @287MdSahil 6 років тому

    very helpful, thank you

  • @abdulrehman-cu6gj
    @abdulrehman-cu6gj 4 роки тому

    zabardast

  • @iamharis704
    @iamharis704 6 років тому

    the great explaination..

  • @Emperor-Of-Karma
    @Emperor-Of-Karma 5 років тому

    How Iw is used to indicate leakage flux. Leakage flux is indicated by the series reactances right? Iw is used to represent Eddycurrent and Hysterisis loss right?

  • @RohanSharma-tf3fn
    @RohanSharma-tf3fn 7 років тому +4

    best one

  • @shawnscientifica6689
    @shawnscientifica6689 7 років тому +1

    Does this assume that the dot convention is that the primary has a dot at the top of its coil so that the reference current goes through it and the secondary one has a dot at the top of its coil as well but its reference current is leaving it so its the opposite emf. I think that would help make the video even easier to understand.

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  7 років тому +1

      in place of dot convention i have used appropriate +/- signs to make it easier. both coils have dots on top side

  • @kamrantaz
    @kamrantaz 6 років тому +1

    I have two doubts for u... 1-what will happen if v1=E1?
    2-what will happen if we use dc current in place of ac current...
    Thanks in advance for your kind help in clearing my doubt..

    • @niketan1014
      @niketan1014 Рік тому

      V1= E1 this condition will not happen as there are resistive and reactive component r1 and x1.
      Dc cannot be used in transformer as it does not have frequency. Therefore transformer will not work and the primary will act as a resistance connected to dc source

  • @krishnakandel2402
    @krishnakandel2402 3 роки тому

    What will be the value of charge on primary and secondary side, are they equal on both side or different?

  • @raghuveervadla6471
    @raghuveervadla6471 6 років тому

    U are awesome!

  • @32_gurjotsingh82
    @32_gurjotsingh82 3 роки тому +1

    Why is i2 dash = K(i2) at 5:43? Sir

    • @silverubica
      @silverubica Рік тому

      Transformator ratio is saying N1/N2=I2/I1 or U1/U2=I2/I1 so if transformer increased voltage to secundary side, he lower current on secundar by same amount he increased voltage, u get that from ratio.So if ratio of turns is 50/100 because he sad secundary have more turns, current will be lower by 0,5 then current on primary. If load increased current on secundary by 2A primary would be higher by 0.5(2/0.5).Hope this helps

  • @sbk4723
    @sbk4723 5 років тому

    Nice sir..
    Try for facts devices

  • @awaisibrahim9283
    @awaisibrahim9283 6 років тому +1

    best ever

  • @madhumatinarule4489
    @madhumatinarule4489 3 роки тому

    Why Ro and Xo not present at secondary side winding??

  • @Stat1onary
    @Stat1onary 4 роки тому

    super

  • @vinaypagare4628
    @vinaypagare4628 4 роки тому

    0:41 the statement does not match with the diagram.. please explain

  • @Akhil-n5l
    @Akhil-n5l 4 роки тому

    you havent changed the polarity based on lenz's law,can you explain?

  • @nomanqureshi5168
    @nomanqureshi5168 5 років тому

    sir please explain the circuit diagram of Wound rotor synchronous machine and Permanent magnet synchronous machine

  • @digantachatterjee3130
    @digantachatterjee3130 4 роки тому

    I have a doubt, you said I2 in the secondary side is creating 'fy2dash'. Then why it's not opposing I2. Instead it is demagnetising.

  • @samridhimangla9520
    @samridhimangla9520 6 років тому

    What about the flux which will be produced by E1. It will also oppose the net flux . I mean fluxE1 +fluxE2 will oppose flux final?

  • @harneetkaur9611
    @harneetkaur9611 4 роки тому

    Why you have connected X0 and R0 in parallel

  • @orochimaru1253
    @orochimaru1253 5 років тому

    👍👌👏

  • @PawanSingh-ks6xb
    @PawanSingh-ks6xb 2 роки тому

    ✌✌✌✌✌

  • @sazzadsalmoon8156
    @sazzadsalmoon8156 6 років тому +1

    Why Ro and Xo is in parallel? why not in series?

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  6 років тому +3

      We are analysing current which can be used and which gets wasted as a loss. When u say parallel circuit , there is more than one current involved(depending upon the number of branches). So u can represent the current which is useful and which is not.
      If u put the elements in series, then there is just one current in the circuit and that does not help you in analysing.

  • @omprakashtharu8398
    @omprakashtharu8398 3 роки тому

    Make more videos please

  • @misaaalhakeem76
    @misaaalhakeem76 4 роки тому

    👍🙂

  • @razashaikh5970
    @razashaikh5970 5 років тому

    What does J times means

  • @ADNANAHMED-eo5xx
    @ADNANAHMED-eo5xx 5 років тому

    👍

  • @mohamedzouhairtalas6011
    @mohamedzouhairtalas6011 5 років тому

    Thank youuuuuuuuuuuuu

  • @harishsingh5225
    @harishsingh5225 7 років тому +2

    I think you have taken wrong assumption of considering Leakage reactance as loss. It will only create voltage drop, not loss.

  • @al-bokhari8197
    @al-bokhari8197 4 роки тому

    where is others videos

  • @princekumar_5963
    @princekumar_5963 5 років тому

    Sir , transformation ratio:is N1/N2

    • @techideas6876
      @techideas6876 5 років тому

      transformation ratio is a when N1/N2. But it is k when N2/N1

  • @ganesh1465
    @ganesh1465 7 років тому +2

    Sir I have an a doubt why we taken io and draw after r and x components what happens if i placed middle of r and x please tell me

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  7 років тому

      Ganesh Ommi :with respect to circuit diagram or phasor diagram?

    • @ganesh1465
      @ganesh1465 7 років тому

      Circuit diagram

  • @MohdAnas-gk8kx
    @MohdAnas-gk8kx 3 роки тому

    Sari video bekar hai
    Kuch bhi ata ni sb i2' i2' likh dete but bata koi ni pata ki i2' aya kha se
    Bhot confusion is video se door hua❤️

  • @shaiksohailthanveer1462
    @shaiksohailthanveer1462 2 роки тому

    The primary has more turns than secondary na

  • @vasanthakumar1991
    @vasanthakumar1991 5 років тому

    God

  • @abhishekkumar-xf3fg
    @abhishekkumar-xf3fg 2 роки тому

    Sir Hindi me bhi ek video btaiye n

  • @seablue1085
    @seablue1085 3 роки тому

    Thanks, plz add english sub for your videos

  • @jeprox31
    @jeprox31 7 років тому

    is secondary winding have more number of turns than the primary? wrong assumptions buddy ... Maybe u mean that secondary has larger copper coils than the primary... check nexttime buddy

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  7 років тому

      could you elaborate more on it?

  • @S.P.S.SRIRAM
    @S.P.S.SRIRAM 2 роки тому

    Bro i didn't get the leakage flux explain more deeply

  • @bigslimeMulla
    @bigslimeMulla 5 років тому

    Hahahahha i just found the god of this stuff

  • @bogdanciulei4417
    @bogdanciulei4417 Рік тому

    This is unusable, I can't understand a single word and subtitles are not available

  • @grovestreet9165
    @grovestreet9165 7 років тому +2

    sir you don't even know what you're taking and what you're telling to students leave youtube now

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  7 років тому +3

      Grove Street I appreciate you going through my content. However it is designed for engineering students. If u are not one, it will not make any sense to u :)

    • @shawnscientifica6689
      @shawnscientifica6689 7 років тому +1

      The video isn't incorrect. The one thing they did not mention is the assumption of the dot convention on the coils so that the reflected emf opposes the primary one.

    • @Xplanator
      @Xplanator  7 років тому +3

      please refer the sign notations across the coils(+/-) and the terminals.

    • @TechwithRen-Z
      @TechwithRen-Z 3 роки тому

      @@shawnscientifica6689 He also mentioned Lenz's law. You must be not listening properly

  • @Maybe.019
    @Maybe.019 3 роки тому

    thank you