How space-time codes work (5G networks)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
  • Information Theory Society presents a brief history of wireless communication (radio) leading to the idea of multiple-antenna wireless systems (MIMO) and space-time codes. 5G networks
    Written by:
    Brit Cruise
    Matthieu Bloch
    Michelle Effros (corrected from video)
    Suhas Diggavi (corrected from video)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 69

  • @nyscersul42
    @nyscersul42 2 роки тому +3

    I love how you showed the alternating current on the battery... perfect illustration hehe

  • @3nthamornin
    @3nthamornin Місяць тому

    i just found your channel by accident and ive got to say your content is FANTASTIC! you explain the concepts so well. thanks!

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  Місяць тому +1

      Cool glad you found it via this video, stay tuned!

  • @samirkaushik8863
    @samirkaushik8863 6 місяців тому +2

    Thanks for the amazingly simple explanation!

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  6 місяців тому +1

      cool nobody has found this video a in a while

  • @jameswise9171
    @jameswise9171 6 років тому +48

    This is the best UA-cam channel.

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  5 років тому +2

      Thank you for your kind words - stay tuned for more

  • @JavierSalcedoC
    @JavierSalcedoC 6 років тому +20

    Art of the Explanation

  • @zeikjt
    @zeikjt 6 років тому +5

    That was great. I love how simple the solution was, that's an inspiring engineering result :)

  • @mehaksaini2552
    @mehaksaini2552 Рік тому

    Such awesome content!!! Wow!!

  • @yomanos
    @yomanos 6 років тому +3

    Keep up the good work, this channel makes great content.

  • @ZonkoKongo
    @ZonkoKongo 6 років тому +9

    I love all 11:31 minutes of this video.

  • @desert-rat145
    @desert-rat145 6 років тому +4

    Very good explanation! I'm working on my CCNA wireless cert and I hope to see more wireless related videos

  • @endxofxeternity
    @endxofxeternity Місяць тому +2

    I love this!

  • @Superogobongo
    @Superogobongo 5 років тому

    Truly excellent presentation, thank you

  • @betoib1504
    @betoib1504 6 років тому +3

    That was awesome, thank you!

  • @pscheidt
    @pscheidt 6 років тому +4

    Really good! Sharing like crazy.

  • @ImmacHn
    @ImmacHn 6 років тому +2

    I love this channel.

  • @xramoj
    @xramoj 5 років тому +7

    1st MIMO video that gives a little bit of explanation.

  • @literallydoing4425
    @literallydoing4425 День тому

    What if we were to use super low frequency radio waves with many different amplitudes? Could that possibly be a solution to the wireless data problem?
    (Ok, strike that I guess)

  • @zga8
    @zga8 5 років тому

    Very good explanation

  • @prasidhr5130
    @prasidhr5130 2 роки тому

    At 11:15, the background looks like the walk area at NUI, Maynooth in the southern campus. The multiple transceivers setup at 11:03 looks like one in TCD. Are you Irish?

  • @inarisound
    @inarisound 5 років тому +1

    Astonishing.

  • @CrucialMuzic
    @CrucialMuzic 6 років тому +3

    Another video from Art of the Problem!!?
    Someone pinch me, I must be dreaming ;p
    Again very informative and straight to the point, I love it :)

  • @cryptomania3553
    @cryptomania3553 2 роки тому

    Gold

  • @johnaweiss
    @johnaweiss 6 місяців тому

    Is "A" a carrier frequency? A simple fixed-frequency, fixed-amplitude modulation of the carrier? Multi-quadrant data?

  • @grjesus9979
    @grjesus9979 2 роки тому +2

    The whole thing about MIMO is to increase capacity. Due to multipath there is going to be inevitable different delays associated with different paths. Therefore when a transmitter sends a symbol in different antennas, in the receiver it just dont arrive at the same time. So my question is what is the whole point of MIMO if we dont take into account the delays and therefore the whole impulse response associated with each path. In other words why you only consider fadind as a scalar factor? Shouldnt it contains also a delay factor?

    • @grosugeorge2107
      @grosugeorge2107 2 роки тому +1

      I find this a good point and the question is nice. I think the phase shift is assumed somewhat sufficient to incorporate delay as an out-of-synchrony measure, although in my humble opinion its far from being the same as phase shifts are shift-direction invariant (they alone dont tell you necessarily if one signal is behind or more advanced than the others signals). Definitely there is more to cover on this topic.

    • @shaaradayamini
      @shaaradayamini 6 місяців тому

      The delay spread is taken into account in OFDM-MIMO systems, the symbol time in OFDM systems is sufficiently higher than the delay spread at the receiver antennas. It means that the duration for which a 1 or 0 is being transmitted is large enough, that the smaller delay spread does not let them interfere and the Receiver can separate them out.

  • @adityasahu96
    @adityasahu96 4 роки тому +1

    omg what an explanation!!

  • @__-xl1zi
    @__-xl1zi 6 років тому +1

    *PLS KEEP MAKING VIDS!*

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  6 років тому

      new videos on the way

    • @__-xl1zi
      @__-xl1zi 6 років тому

      Thx man! I was so scared cause this was posted months ago and I thought for a second u stopped! R u ever making one for how cryptocurrency works? I saw you made a teaser for it before. I rlly was looking forward to it.

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  6 років тому

      yes I have a 30min special video on Bitcoin coming out in < 1 month, been working on it for a long time.

  • @NeelBasu
    @NeelBasu 4 роки тому

    In the cellphone example there are multiple transmitting antennas and a single receiving antenna. So it is multi input. But I don't understand why that is multiple output ? Because the cellphones do not have multiple antennas. Why it isn't Multi Input Single Output ? Or do the cellphones have multiple antennas too ?

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  4 роки тому

      That's correct the cell phones also have multi antennas.

    • @NeelBasu
      @NeelBasu 4 роки тому +1

      @@ArtOfTheProblem yes, but one antenna for gsm another antenna for cellular another antenna for bluetooth another antenna for gps ? What if a device only have a cellular communication abilities no wifi, gps, bluetooth. Or if a device have wifi only, no cellular, gps, or bluetooth. Does the device still have multiple antenna ?

  • @daslolo
    @daslolo 4 роки тому

    wow! so clear

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  4 роки тому

      glad to hear it thanks for the feedback we have 3 more of these on the way

    • @daslolo
      @daslolo 4 роки тому +1

      Very nice I'll watch them!
      Could you have a look at the DJI Digital FPV and tell me what you think of the antenna configuration? We usually fly analog and so we don't really deal with this distribution of signal, deciding on antennas is trivial but with a MIMO... no idea what's the best configuration for long range, probably not something as trivial.
      Also did you read that paper by a Chinese team where they use circularly polarized antennas to increase diversity?

  • @SerioSeria
    @SerioSeria 4 роки тому +3

    This is just gold! You are producing extremely high quality material for free to educate people on Information Theory.
    You really have the gift to turn complex concepts into digestable and meaningful information that most people in this field can get. That is just brilliant!
    I am teaching this myself and find it hard to explain in a simple, easy to follow manner. Your videos help me a lot with improving the teachability of this concepts.
    Thanks a million for all of your content! Keep up the awesome work!

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  4 роки тому

      thank you so much for the words of inspiration

  • @mycontent3632
    @mycontent3632 6 років тому +2

    9:00 How does the receiver know what H_1 and H_2 are? Doesn't it need that to find A and B?

    • @prateeksingh5293
      @prateeksingh5293 3 роки тому +1

      I don't think that the receiver needs to know H_1 and H_2 because the decoding algorithm for the message remains the same
      The two message symbols being sent remains in the form of (A)(B) and (-B)(A). Now, regardless of the receiver knowing whether the symbols are being sent from H_1 or H_2, the received equations will remain A-B and A+B

  • @muhammadadil3981
    @muhammadadil3981 3 роки тому

    Sir, can we ask for videos to be prepaired on request? On suggested topics?

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  3 роки тому +1

      No I don't take solicitation but I always open to suggestions. unless you'd like to commission a video?

    • @muhammadadil3981
      @muhammadadil3981 3 роки тому

      @@ArtOfTheProblem Videos related to Information Theory? Like for example on "Shannon Channel Capacity Theorems" etc.

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  3 роки тому +2

      @@muhammadadil3981 i have a whole series on this! check out my channel page (episode 2)

    • @muhammadadil3981
      @muhammadadil3981 3 роки тому

      @@ArtOfTheProblem sure sir

  • @gabepk
    @gabepk 4 роки тому

    Wow! I graduated from Computer Science 2 years ago and I had no idea about this. I have one question, though: Do you know if phones that accepts 2 SIM cards have 2 signal receptors? Because sometimes one SIM can be out of service, but not the other one. :)

  • @abdurrahmansa3763
    @abdurrahmansa3763 5 років тому

    Awesome

  • @KittyBoom360
    @KittyBoom360 6 років тому +8

    If you could explain entropic uncertainty in reference to information theory and quantum mechanics in a comprehensive way to your viewers... Wait, what I am asking, the impossible??? Are you up for it?
    (but don't let anything delay your upcoming stuff on Bitcoin and blockchain!)

    • @ArtOfTheProblem
      @ArtOfTheProblem  6 років тому +9

      :) We do plan to cover Quantum Information Theory in 2018

  • @Primence
    @Primence 6 років тому +5

    niced

  • @kumu141
    @kumu141 3 роки тому

    11:23 it is supposed to be Suhas Diggavi (UCLA)

  • @diego898
    @diego898 6 років тому +3

    The music was very high-tension - something out of There Will Be Blood

  • @__mk_km__
    @__mk_km__ 6 років тому +2

    Naaah
    Just gonna use PRN codes ;)

  • @anujmandrekar171
    @anujmandrekar171 2 роки тому

    the background music is very irritating

  • @chuckjordan6455
    @chuckjordan6455 5 років тому

    1:18 "BY THE 1980s"? Why by the 1980s??? That doesn't make sense.

  • @SuperSeagull12
    @SuperSeagull12 5 років тому

    1:41 That's... not how a signal generator works.

    • @Killadog1980
      @Killadog1980 5 років тому

      It is so obvious that you should have asked yourself, why would he represent the signal generator like that?

    • @SuperSeagull12
      @SuperSeagull12 5 років тому

      @@Killadog1980 I think you missed my point. Showing a signal generator as a box with wires mechanically dancing around inside is quite silly.