say you dont understand the type of game it is and who made it without just saying it. It's Bethesda, we come here for the amazing stories and lore, real fans could care less about that.
@@obercanober4182 yeah save for the fact that this isnt the same kind of game as starfield, not even close in fact they share TWO similarities: Space exploration and base building. THAT'S IT lol
@@gijsmekking5283 thought about that but If I was truly going to spend the $100 fee and time to put it on steam I might as well just create the missions by hand, which would probably feel better anyway.
Obviously the best way to use AI would be to use the generated text as templates for your story arcs, replies and conversations. And never mention the use of AI in your submission. Then you will be golden.
@@ThrillDaWillI bet if you got a small team together y’all could make a great game. And us, your loyal subs/viewers, would take pride in playin the game no matter the genre. Watching progress videos of the game developing would be awesome way to advertise. Just an idea ;)
I did this same experiment when they released UE5 and was absolutely SHOCKED at how easy it was to get things working with so little work. It's the main reason I've said they had zero excuse for making another loading screen simulator.
Sad and pathetic Starfield had to stay in the Bethesda bubble of what they THINK everyone wants, versus what they actually do. Took two days to give people what they wanted, versus years. This is like a company using ms dos while others are on Windows. Bethesda prob doubling down, no no our design software is reliable, this UE5 brand new untested! 🤣🤣 or w.e else will please their shareholders and not the gamers.
@@B01 I think the reason they don't want to use UE5 is because they have tons of devs and dev leaders who have been working with their own engine for so long that they have no idea how to use anything else. Learning curves for huge software systems like this are fucked. Don't get me wrong though, for a project like Starfield they should have absolutely just hired a team specialising in UE5. It would have cost so much less money, and would be a much better game.
This video sums up the modern gamer perfectly, completely clueless, produces total trash no one will ever play instead of learning real skill, and fails to learn anything in the process.
"...with more passion and love..." Dude, just because of this I'm pretty sure yours will be a lot better, if you decide to continue and finish this project of course. Best wishes and much respect for you bro 👍
The moment you put tue game together, let me know! Since starcitzen is been to be released antime between now and 2323, it wold be fun to have some competition. Nice work so far. Pls consideer making this game the way people really want it.
Do I need a quantum PC to run this? Because Todd told me to buy one for his. But I'm able to play Starfield on a potato from 2014 with community fixes while ppl with 4090 have crashes.
Bruh I knew it. Bethesda stans with the cope in the comment section. Its fine if tiu prefer eating shit, just dont lie to me and say its not shit. Bethesda is not the bethesda that made skyrim anymore, just like bungie isnt the same company that made the original halo trilogy anymore. Get over it.
Better ragdolls Better Landing animations Ships can travel in orbit You can blow up landed ships If you had a team this talented you could have made Starfield what people expected from the start
I was having a bad day, before watching your video. Man, you made me laugh hard. Thank you for fixing my mood XD Also, pretty good stuff you did there. Starfield was in development something like, 6 f***ing years. While you in just 48h achieved manual landing and ludicrous speed!!! 🤣
Ok, so just make 999 more large bodies, fill a small percent of them with tons of NPCs, creatures, weapons, clothes, miscellaneous items, enter able buildings, numerous noc ships flying around, all in one seemless open world, with not a single load screen. release this with console support and make your millions. Or go play Star Citizen.
@genericthiccgirl228 you're wrong. The engine is fine. It was never meant to create ultra realistic games like Red Dead 2. Their engine is simple, their engine is what allows the community to do what they've been doing for years, the creation engine is the selling point of a Bethesda game, if they take it out, their games would just turn into borderlands, a looter shooter with barely any mod suport. Do you think people are able to create crazy big mods on Unreal Engine? No, they can't. The only reason this dude managed to make something remotely close to Starfield in a small time is because he used pre made assets. That's the only reason. The creation engine is a very, very good engine, simple to use, and extremely flexible. People can turn Skyrim into a soulslike because of it...
@@sturmbnnuylol stop fanboying. The creation engine is definitely showing it's age and limitations. It's obvious that seamless planet exploration was in the original design plans but had to be scrapped and split into zones because they couldn't fix the floating point error problem. It's obvious that modern game engines are surpassing creation engine's capabilities. We see similar issues rearing their head in the development of Star Citizen. The underlying technology (lumberyard, aka cryengine) is a dated, bloated mess. Most of SC's development has been pushing this old engine to it's absolute limits and rewriting large portions of it to accommodate planets... and UE5 can now do that with a handful of plugins, and nanites can handle LOD's more elegantly than any other game engine in history. That isn't saying Bethesda didn't put a lot of work into their game or that their game is bad, but denying that creation engine has old bones is some real willful ignorance. Bethesda needs to rework the foundations of creation engine if they want to push it to the next level and stop making players sit through loading screens all the time.
If I learned anything in the last decade of gaming, it's that AAA devs really spend a ton of time and money and tend to underdeliver, while indie studios w small teams and budgets keep making hits. Money got nothing on someone doing it out of love or genuine desire
@@Dr.Silverwolf20 patrolling this comment section makes you wish gaming today wasn't just going "my game good your game bad" and an endless cycle of negativity
@brendandonohue2398 miss the days of the SNES and N64 man, i had friends who had the other systems and it was just...nice to see what everyone had, no hating, just "woah you got Goldeneye?! Lets play and when you come over i got Tony Hawk Pro Skater on my Playstation, we can try that out!".
@@brendandonohue2398I'm pretty sure that's just how humans have always been. "Your stick bad, my stick good." -Cavemen "Your book is preposterous and frill. While my book is the zenith of society." -Some Renaissance snob "Your game bad, my game good" Gamers today. We've just cycled back to unga bunga but with modern day inventions.
The reason it was able to be made in two days is due to UE5's premade assets and engine. Now, he absolutely did a better job with the engine than 99.9% of people do, but don't pretend that this is better than Starfield. This just has one feature included that's missing from the game. Would you rather Starfield gets rid of its cities and unique NPCs and replace it all with this?
This just proved to me that Bethesda focused on all the wrong things when it came to their game. It's incredibly ambitious to make a space travel RPG but if you don't have the main component of taking off and landing down than don't make the fricken game . Good work man I just subscribed because of this video
@luzpngtuber437 no need to be hostile. I think many agree that Starfield is a good game. But it could have been a GREAT game. It's 2023, I think having a game with loading screens between every section is kinda whack. I haven't played an "open world" game with that many transition screens since idk, STALKER? Also a fantastic game, but one that released in 2007. Hiding behind the "its not a space sim" doesn't change how absolutely dated that engine is. And they absolutely "would" have, if they "could" about the space features. I mean we essentially have a skybox with a planet in the background right now.
It's cool that you made this, but to shit on Starfield when it's suppose to be nothing like no man sky is stupid. It focused on being an rpg and does it so well. It was explained in the starfield direct.
If you can do THAT in 48 hours... what can a dev team do in 5 years and with proper Management behind them? D: Impressive work and awesome showcase of how good UE5 actually is :P
out of the 8 year cycle, assuming that number is accurate. with how the game is, i bet they spent 5-6 years doing 'americianised maoist struggle sessions' aka dei training, ideologically litmus testing their entire staff, massively slowing down if not stopping work on it. then they went omg we have nothing to sell and we got bought out by ms. crunched, and pushed out a beta as the full product.
I strongly believe this game was in pre-production for five years and then smashed together within 18-24 months with the aid of the 27 credited external firms.
@@ligerstripe99 there are a lot of unique planets to explore, and missions on them, as well as characters on each planets all voiced, not to mention the complexities of the base building and ship building, I'd say they spent way more time on those things than any other thing. Now I'm no game developer so I wouldn't know how hard it is to do that
@@Mat69420k Do you want planet A shaded blue, or planet B shaded green but with the exact same flora and fauna as planet A. Less than 5 variations of abandoned stations, facilities or outposts. less than 4 on settlements. Only two for unique geological features. and about 1 or 2 different versions of caves.
@@ligerstripe99 it didn't repeated that much for what I was playing, but still that was Bethesda way of doing Skyrim and it was still great, don't know what changes here, it's the same thing but more, the one thing I have to complain here is the performance, and the fact that it isn't like No Man's Sky, that you can exit the planet physically, without loading screens
Great, now you just need to replicate this 1000 different times with thousands of different tiles for each planet. Add in over 60000 plus words of dialog. Add in hundreds of sidequests, a main store, faction quests, ship customization skills, and perks. Creation of randomly generated events and apply radiant AI to npc, Adding quests and missions on all the planets. Animations, cities with interactible environments, object physics, and you'll be close. Looks good though.
I mean he could just copypaste this planet thousand of times and randomly assign them with different shades of almond + some occasional forest and it would be almost as mediocre as Lolfield.
@@Joseph-wh5of that's the point: I did and still am. It's the most uninspired boring bland and mid game I've played this year. I mean by Bethesda standards its 9/10. Unfortunately I played Baldur's Gate 3 before Snorefield so my expectations are higher than they were in 2010 where Starfield belongs.
@jarosawdylewski9507 Sorry, you don't enjoy the game. For me, it's one of the best games I have played this year, exactly what I expected from Bethesda and what I have been waiting for since Skyrim. Baldurs gate 3 is fantastic, but it lacks that charm where you can get lost into a world that Bethesda provides. I guess Bethesda games just aren't for you anymore.
Incredible talent, but the use of plugins, lack of scale and the lack of features does kind of make it entirely different. It's not comparable. If this was how easy it was, there'd be a thousand games like it.
2 days vs 8 years. The 8 years provides the time for all those things. Even more so, this Creator had the starfield framework to begin with and shoot for. So yes, the 2 day game has it way easier and isn't as fleshed out. But he's showing the capability of Unreal engine and the market place. But also the level of detail that Bethesda went in with for the story and assets. I feel like Bethesda didn't use any AI tools. Or at least ones they didn't develop themselves. Still Creation Engine is mad old
I'd like to understand the point you're trying to make: that the basic asset flip is possible within 48 hours, while a custom built IP with engine, physics, artwork, story writing, sound design, quests and modeling takes years? I agree with your criticism that wasting resources on things that are commodity nowadays like engine and physics and other major advancements should be licensed rather than spending years on this because companies that specialize in engine development (UE etc.) can do it better and for a lower price, it's their core business. Starfield development should have focused on things like seamless planetary to interplanetary travel and other things their target audience wants (and publicly stated so).
Do you think it might be an engine constraint? Who knows if creation engine could handle this along with NPC spawn, procedurally generated areas and everything else the engine is already having a hard time handling lol. That being said, I like the game just the way it is. It takes time to fly from ground to orbit to another planet. Fast trav just makes it quicker and I'm perfectly okay with that... however, I do understand the desire to truly fly and explore. There will always be no man's sky haha
Not so much an engine constraint as much as an innovation constraint. They're backlogged updating the engine sure, but it just causes them to be unable to innovate on things modern game devs do pretty often lately. Every climbing section or slow dialogue section in any modern game is actually a hidden loading screen. They just aren't hiding them is the issue, which mods for skyrim did remove quite a few and speed up loading times, so I doubt it'll be an issue for long. I'm sure it's possible with mods to pull off, though. I mean skyrim had a mod for a functioning hot air balloon with full physics on every part- and its over 10 years old
If they just released this and made a comprehensive set of modding tools for the rest of the 8 or so years, I genuinely think it'd be a better overall game.
Congratulations on doing this mate, if you plan to launch this and optmize this game for older computers I'm seriously considering buying it, I always loved No Man Sky but right now it's just unplayable in my computer, too many fps drops. Btw, loved that Spaceballs reference! lmao Also I'm leaving this rant here: It's 2023 and people STILL give Bethesda the bEnEfIt oF ThE dOuBt....geez After what the modding community(as a whole, from Fallout to Skyrim/Oblivion/Morrowind) has shown what they are capable of, after hundreds of people making from solo to small team projects like Escape From The Backrooms...people still go and buy Bethesda stuff... Some people like to keep the world burning.
Now spawn 10000 toilet paper rolls with perfect physics spilling out of a room, then leave the planet and have them still be there, in their exact position, when you get back, all while there are dynamic NPCs and random events everywhere. (Though don't mistake that for me saying what you did here isn't impressive, because it is)
The flipside of this is listening to a podcast where they said they killed a bunch of dudes then came back later and the quest giver is just chilling with the dead bodies who never get moved or disappear.
@@DarkLightGaming117 lol yeah, I wasnt trying to imply one is better than the other. Just that everyone is talking about the graphical weaknesses of the Bethesda engine while ignoring every crazy thing it is technically capable of, like how your followers somehow have something to say for almost every questline and decision you make, or how dialogue for many quests will change if you did another quest prior or joined a certain group. But yes, with so many things happening in the game you are bound to have dumb cases like that. They can account for many things but there's no way they can account for everything.
@@TheCorrupt it's not about him writing anything, he is the director responsible for the rest of the team and general quality of his products. Every game made by Bethesda is his creation.
This comment section hurts badly.. all the people that have 0 idea about game development running their mouths lol. This isn't even .001% compared to starfield
Todd: "Who cares if the game is good or not? The modders will fix it for us" Thrill: *Builds a universally superior version and offers it for free* Todd: "No, not like that"
You can exit and enter the planet manually in your game, so yours it's already superior
you can also do that in no mans sky, and spore so both of those are better
say you dont understand the type of game it is and who made it without just saying it. It's Bethesda, we come here for the amazing stories and lore, real fans could care less about that.
@@obercanober4182 yeah save for the fact that this isnt the same kind of game as starfield, not even close in fact they share TWO similarities: Space exploration and base building. THAT'S IT lol
@@Zaedin710 lmao so where's the amazing stories and lore then
And your version doesn't look like someone poured a glass of milk in my eyes!
Should I continue working on this and release it for free on steam?
Yes, not free though.
£9.99 to get something back for your time 🤘🏻
Unfortunately steam doesn't allow AI generated content. Otherwise it would be better than 50% of the junk projects on there.
@@gijsmekking5283 thought about that but If I was truly going to spend the $100 fee and time to put it on steam I might as well just create the missions by hand, which would probably feel better anyway.
Obviously the best way to use AI would be to use the generated text as templates for your story arcs, replies and conversations. And never mention the use of AI in your submission. Then you will be golden.
Bruh, there is literally no reason not to. But fr, don't do it for free. With that kind of skill make something off of it. I'd buy.
Dude created the basic, entry level foundation of Star Citizen
And it works without bugs xD
I was thinking the same thing!
In 48h
Just shows, money can't fix stupid
quick, somebody tell Frontier developments!
Between the space balls bit, the editing, and the sheer talent, you've earned another sub
agreed
Agreed
@@dubtartOh man. Are we three the same person cuz I was about to say the same thing... 😅 😮😢
Mans could be an avengers level threat to triple A studios if he focuses on one game he truly believes in FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR😭
I have crippling diagnosed ADHD.
@@ThrillDaWillthat's why they give you drugs 😀
Mood@@ThrillDaWill
@@ThrillDaWillI bet if you got a small team together y’all could make a great game. And us, your loyal subs/viewers, would take pride in playin the game no matter the genre. Watching progress videos of the game developing would be awesome way to advertise. Just an idea ;)
@@TomTomMarchy that would be sick.
Game aside, can we talk about how good the editing and the quality of this video was?
You’ve earned yourself a new sub.
Thrilled to see I'm not the only one who uses "Bungus" as a placeholder value during development
I thought I was alone
My people 😢
You don't give yourself enough credit; you have a brilliant mind! Way to go! 🎉
I did this same experiment when they released UE5 and was absolutely SHOCKED at how easy it was to get things working with so little work. It's the main reason I've said they had zero excuse for making another loading screen simulator.
It's time they put to rest their creation engine
Sad and pathetic Starfield had to stay in the Bethesda bubble of what they THINK everyone wants, versus what they actually do. Took two days to give people what they wanted, versus years. This is like a company using ms dos while others are on Windows. Bethesda prob doubling down, no no our design software is reliable, this UE5 brand new untested! 🤣🤣 or w.e else will please their shareholders and not the gamers.
@@RoboRoby321That time was at least 10 years ago.
@@haoukkax8896No, they just re-worked Gamebryo into Creation Engine.
@@B01 I think the reason they don't want to use UE5 is because they have tons of devs and dev leaders who have been working with their own engine for so long that they have no idea how to use anything else. Learning curves for huge software systems like this are fucked.
Don't get me wrong though, for a project like Starfield they should have absolutely just hired a team specialising in UE5. It would have cost so much less money, and would be a much better game.
If he's willing to develop this game more, we should find him some voice actors so he can make actual cutscenes and give stuff more flavor.
It's pretty much a 1:1 of the Bethesda version. 10/10 you should keep going and release to steam
And when the world needed him most, he returned.
I love this game so MUCH!!!! PLEASE PUT EFFORT IN TO REFINE IT AND MAKE IT A GREAT GAME!!!! PLEAAAASSSSSEEEEe!!!!!!!
Yeah I came here from an article and I'm glad I did, definitely subbing and buying your version of Starfield, thank you!!
This video sums up the modern gamer perfectly, completely clueless, produces total trash no one will ever play instead of learning real skill, and fails to learn anything in the process.
"...with more passion and love..."
Dude, just because of this I'm pretty sure yours will be a lot better, if you decide to continue and finish this project of course.
Best wishes and much respect for you bro
👍
This is better than starfield since you walk into the ship and takes off manually
no joke, when he did the Ludacris speed part and had the Colonel Sanders line, as soon as the dude said chicken I got a KFC add
LUDICROUS SPEED! GOOOO!
The moment you put tue game together, let me know! Since starcitzen is been to be released antime between now and 2323, it wold be fun to have some competition. Nice work so far. Pls consideer making this game the way people really want it.
shit was mad funny, appreciated the STARTLED CITIZEN clip as well - like seriously, what is wrong w starfield NPC faces *cries* GOTY BABYYYY
One must imagiane ThrillDaWill happy...
7:29 I LITERALLY GOT A KFC ADD RIGHT HERE, I AM CRYINNNG
If Dunkey learned to code.
Do I need a quantum PC to run this? Because Todd told me to buy one for his. But I'm able to play Starfield on a potato from 2014 with community fixes while ppl with 4090 have crashes.
My game currently runs at 80-90 fps on an RTX 2080, so I’m not sure how it stacks up to starfield. At the very least I guess I could lock it at 60 fps
@@ThrillDaWill step up the game bro, it's 2023. In 2023 you don't make a game that doesn't run 23 fps on avg AT LEAST
Bruh I knew it. Bethesda stans with the cope in the comment section. Its fine if tiu prefer eating shit, just dont lie to me and say its not shit. Bethesda is not the bethesda that made skyrim anymore, just like bungie isnt the same company that made the original halo trilogy anymore. Get over it.
Now this game is worth $80 pre order
Better ragdolls
Better Landing animations
Ships can travel in orbit
You can blow up landed ships
If you had a team this talented you could have made Starfield what people expected from the start
Bro now we can fly off and on the planets.
Meanwhile Starfield: Loading screen->loading screen->loading screen
Okay, now do that in the Creation Engine.
Damn, my man over here making Star Citizen in two weeks if he tried.
Without major bugs not to mention
In your dreams! BUT Unreal Engine has potential to get there eventually.
so he's sitting on millions of dollars in income but can't be bothered to?
@@cmdrls212 Trust me, they're not sitting on that money. It's absolutely spent... Just... Not on the game...
I was having a bad day, before watching your video. Man, you made me laugh hard. Thank you for fixing my mood XD Also, pretty good stuff you did there. Starfield was in development something like, 6 f***ing years. While you in just 48h achieved manual landing and ludicrous speed!!! 🤣
That's because he just literally stole what was already made and ported it to an uglier engine with a couple janky modifications
@@justinolson1978 Still looks better
now to it in lego
Ok, so just make 999 more large bodies, fill a small percent of them with tons of NPCs, creatures, weapons, clothes, miscellaneous items, enter able buildings, numerous noc ships flying around, all in one seemless open world, with not a single load screen. release this with console support and make your millions. Or go play Star Citizen.
So, instead of 8 years, you can do it in 2 if you make the game on a modern engine with normal tools.
Its best of comment
No, the video is fine and all, but don't downplay the work that went into Starfield.
@brunoneves6455 Not downplaying the work that went into Starfield, we are talking about Bethesda's trash engine they refuse to part with.
@genericthiccgirl228 you're wrong. The engine is fine. It was never meant to create ultra realistic games like Red Dead 2. Their engine is simple, their engine is what allows the community to do what they've been doing for years, the creation engine is the selling point of a Bethesda game, if they take it out, their games would just turn into borderlands, a looter shooter with barely any mod suport.
Do you think people are able to create crazy big mods on Unreal Engine? No, they can't. The only reason this dude managed to make something remotely close to Starfield in a small time is because he used pre made assets. That's the only reason.
The creation engine is a very, very good engine, simple to use, and extremely flexible. People can turn Skyrim into a soulslike because of it...
@@sturmbnnuylol stop fanboying. The creation engine is definitely showing it's age and limitations. It's obvious that seamless planet exploration was in the original design plans but had to be scrapped and split into zones because they couldn't fix the floating point error problem. It's obvious that modern game engines are surpassing creation engine's capabilities. We see similar issues rearing their head in the development of Star Citizen. The underlying technology (lumberyard, aka cryengine) is a dated, bloated mess. Most of SC's development has been pushing this old engine to it's absolute limits and rewriting large portions of it to accommodate planets... and UE5 can now do that with a handful of plugins, and nanites can handle LOD's more elegantly than any other game engine in history. That isn't saying Bethesda didn't put a lot of work into their game or that their game is bad, but denying that creation engine has old bones is some real willful ignorance. Bethesda needs to rework the foundations of creation engine if they want to push it to the next level and stop making players sit through loading screens all the time.
This doesnt look like an rpg though just A casual shooter with space flying if i wanted that i would just go play no mans sky
Exactly, people who subscribe because of this video and not because of his content have a) not played starfield b) own a PS5 and c) are just children.
Took dude 48 hours to make more intuitive and interesting space flight than Bethesda over 10 years
If I learned anything in the last decade of gaming, it's that AAA devs really spend a ton of time and money and tend to underdeliver, while indie studios w small teams and budgets keep making hits.
Money got nothing on someone doing it out of love or genuine desire
Lol because Bethesda spent 7.5 years figuring out how to make it work on the Xbox series S... since you know it's required by M$.
Lol funny af dude you're amazing man thank you for the laughs.
Also I wish the game devs were as smart as you :/
The copeing and seething is delicious.
This is not an opinion, this is facts Bethesda. Man u fucking nailed It!!! awesome demostration. Get mi like and new sub.
omg starfield!11!!1!11 bethesda hire this mam
yes, and no.. he is forced to work with the creation engine.. ill be sure he would go angry in a very short time.. how restrictive that engine is.
Oh god this comment sectuon is gonna be a toxic waste dump
Patrolling this comment section almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter
@@Dr.Silverwolf20 patrolling this comment section makes you wish gaming today wasn't just going "my game good your game bad" and an endless cycle of negativity
@brendandonohue2398 miss the days of the SNES and N64 man, i had friends who had the other systems and it was just...nice to see what everyone had, no hating, just "woah you got Goldeneye?! Lets play and when you come over i got Tony Hawk Pro Skater on my Playstation, we can try that out!".
Mhm
@@brendandonohue2398I'm pretty sure that's just how humans have always been. "Your stick bad, my stick good." -Cavemen
"Your book is preposterous and frill. While my book is the zenith of society." -Some Renaissance snob
"Your game bad, my game good" Gamers today.
We've just cycled back to unga bunga but with modern day inventions.
Интересно было посмотреть, невероятно, за 48 часов такую красоту сделать...! :)
The reason it was able to be made in two days is due to UE5's premade assets and engine. Now, he absolutely did a better job with the engine than 99.9% of people do, but don't pretend that this is better than Starfield. This just has one feature included that's missing from the game. Would you rather Starfield gets rid of its cities and unique NPCs and replace it all with this?
I wonder if this can be achieved with a couple of mods on Starfield
Engine will hold back the modding community.
In so that I'm in this thread when someone links the mod that works.
You did it 19 loading screens better than bethesda
man u need make real starfield, waiting mode activated.
Y'know, I think people just want to play Elite Dangerous and just don't know that it exists.
Except your need 500 buttons to play Elite Dangerous.
@@TheCorrupt dog I can comfortably play Elite on an Xbox controller. It's just a learning curve, and it's very worth it
@@TheCorruptVoice Attack. Thank me later. 👍
Thrill, Todd, both starts with T
This isn’t a coincidence folks
Thrill Howard Starfield 2 confirmed
Hell yeah baby let’s go!!
Ok someone needs to give this guy the money the people to make a space game!!
This just proved to me that Bethesda focused on all the wrong things when it came to their game. It's incredibly ambitious to make a space travel RPG but if you don't have the main component of taking off and landing down than don't make the fricken game . Good work man I just subscribed because of this video
It's an RPG not a simulation game. I think you can argue that Todd misrepresented as such, but still
play the game and shut up
Yes, that is the only part of the game that matter. Landing the ship and getting up to space. You're right. What a completely r3t4rd3d take, congrats.
@@luzpngtuber437he didn't.
@luzpngtuber437 no need to be hostile. I think many agree that Starfield is a good game. But it could have been a GREAT game. It's 2023, I think having a game with loading screens between every section is kinda whack. I haven't played an "open world" game with that many transition screens since idk, STALKER? Also a fantastic game, but one that released in 2007. Hiding behind the "its not a space sim" doesn't change how absolutely dated that engine is. And they absolutely "would" have, if they "could" about the space features. I mean we essentially have a skybox with a planet in the background right now.
Starfield is almost criminally underwhelming. This on the other hand is mind blowing stuff.
It's awesome ! Really great ! Well done 🤩🤩🤩
It's cool that you made this, but to shit on Starfield when it's suppose to be nothing like no man sky is stupid. It focused on being an rpg and does it so well. It was explained in the starfield direct.
Nice space balls reference. Loves that ludicrous speed stuff it was funny as all h***
If you can do THAT in 48 hours... what can a dev team do in 5 years and with proper Management behind them? D: Impressive work and awesome showcase of how good UE5 actually is :P
In 5 years you will waste most of the time solving bugs.
It show cases how easily you can steal other people's packages and slap them into a game engine.
5 yrs of development would take 50 years to debug. I bet Starfield is actually a 2013 game but it was junky and crashy for 10 years
Starfield on the paper it's an old game. The producer said that Starfield is 25 years in the making. @@eatonkuntz
If it takes 1 woman 9 months to make a baby, just imagine how quickly 9 women could do it!
It makes you wonder how mutch of the 8 years did bgs spend smashing and rewriting the old Creation engine to add a diet version of space travel.
out of the 8 year cycle, assuming that number is accurate. with how the game is, i bet they spent 5-6 years doing 'americianised maoist struggle sessions' aka dei training, ideologically litmus testing their entire staff, massively slowing down if not stopping work on it. then they went omg we have nothing to sell and we got bought out by ms. crunched, and pushed out a beta as the full product.
I strongly believe this game was in pre-production for five years and then smashed together within 18-24
months with the aid of the 27 credited external firms.
@@ligerstripe99 there are a lot of unique planets to explore, and missions on them, as well as characters on each planets all voiced, not to mention the complexities of the base building and ship building, I'd say they spent way more time on those things than any other thing. Now I'm no game developer so I wouldn't know how hard it is to do that
@@Mat69420k Do you want planet A shaded blue, or planet B shaded green but with the exact same flora and fauna as planet A.
Less than 5 variations of abandoned stations, facilities or outposts. less than 4 on settlements. Only two for unique geological features. and about 1 or 2 different versions of caves.
@@ligerstripe99 it didn't repeated that much for what I was playing, but still that was Bethesda way of doing Skyrim and it was still great, don't know what changes here, it's the same thing but more, the one thing I have to complain here is the performance, and the fact that it isn't like No Man's Sky, that you can exit the planet physically, without loading screens
Can you share what plugins u used to make the planets ? Or better make a tutorial ? :) .
Great, now you just need to replicate this 1000 different times with thousands of different tiles for each planet. Add in over 60000 plus words of dialog. Add in hundreds of sidequests, a main store, faction quests, ship customization skills, and perks. Creation of randomly generated events and apply radiant AI to npc,
Adding quests and missions on all the planets. Animations, cities with interactible environments,
object physics, and you'll be close. Looks good though.
Big numbers good.
I mean he could just copypaste this planet thousand of times and randomly assign them with different shades of almond + some occasional forest and it would be almost as mediocre as Lolfield.
@@whiskybob So you haven't played Starfield.
@@Joseph-wh5of that's the point: I did and still am. It's the most uninspired boring bland and mid game I've played this year. I mean by Bethesda standards its 9/10. Unfortunately I played Baldur's Gate 3 before Snorefield so my expectations are higher than they were in 2010 where Starfield belongs.
@jarosawdylewski9507 Sorry, you don't enjoy the game. For me, it's one of the best games I have played this year, exactly what I expected from Bethesda and what I have been waiting for since Skyrim. Baldurs gate 3 is fantastic, but it lacks that charm where you can get lost into a world that Bethesda provides. I guess Bethesda games just aren't for you anymore.
Incredible talent, but the use of plugins, lack of scale and the lack of features does kind of make it entirely different. It's not comparable. If this was how easy it was, there'd be a thousand games like it.
2 days vs 8 years. The 8 years provides the time for all those things. Even more so, this Creator had the starfield framework to begin with and shoot for. So yes, the 2 day game has it way easier and isn't as fleshed out. But he's showing the capability of Unreal engine and the market place. But also the level of detail that Bethesda went in with for the story and assets. I feel like Bethesda didn't use any AI tools. Or at least ones they didn't develop themselves. Still Creation Engine is mad old
@@HanmaHeirojust adding that it's also a singular person vs a whole dev team.
Add vehicles next. Like you know those cool ones in Star Wars.
Found this video from an article and now found a new youtuber
Now just mod it into Starfield
Разработка дорожает. Стыд и позор Bethesda.
Its true. What shame
I'd like to understand the point you're trying to make: that the basic asset flip is possible within 48 hours, while a custom built IP with engine, physics, artwork, story writing, sound design, quests and modeling takes years?
I agree with your criticism that wasting resources on things that are commodity nowadays like engine and physics and other major advancements should be licensed rather than spending years on this because companies that specialize in engine development (UE etc.) can do it better and for a lower price, it's their core business. Starfield development should have focused on things like seamless planetary to interplanetary travel and other things their target audience wants (and publicly stated so).
Do you think it might be an engine constraint? Who knows if creation engine could handle this along with NPC spawn, procedurally generated areas and everything else the engine is already having a hard time handling lol.
That being said, I like the game just the way it is. It takes time to fly from ground to orbit to another planet. Fast trav just makes it quicker and I'm perfectly okay with that... however, I do understand the desire to truly fly and explore. There will always be no man's sky haha
Not so much an engine constraint as much as an innovation constraint. They're backlogged updating the engine sure, but it just causes them to be unable to innovate on things modern game devs do pretty often lately. Every climbing section or slow dialogue section in any modern game is actually a hidden loading screen. They just aren't hiding them is the issue, which mods for skyrim did remove quite a few and speed up loading times, so I doubt it'll be an issue for long. I'm sure it's possible with mods to pull off, though. I mean skyrim had a mod for a functioning hot air balloon with full physics on every part- and its over 10 years old
Best example of this would be the new God of war games ^^^
If they just released this and made a comprehensive set of modding tools for the rest of the 8 or so years, I genuinely think it'd be a better overall game.
They?
I Thank God everyday people like you don't work in videogames.
Только в оригинальной игре там в каждую комнату заходишь и в ней можно все рассматривать минут 5 - произведение искусства. А тут мультик.
If you do a mod for Starfield ships can fly everywhere like Star Citizen, you can even ask $$$. I would buy your mod
I would rather buy this for 30 bucks with a mod community. 😂
Shut up and take my money!
Congratulations on doing this mate, if you plan to launch this and optmize this game for older computers I'm seriously considering buying it, I always loved No Man Sky but right now it's just unplayable in my computer, too many fps drops.
Btw, loved that Spaceballs reference! lmao
Also I'm leaving this rant here:
It's 2023 and people STILL give Bethesda the bEnEfIt oF ThE dOuBt....geez
After what the modding community(as a whole, from Fallout to Skyrim/Oblivion/Morrowind) has shown what they are capable of, after hundreds of people making from solo to small team projects like Escape From The Backrooms...people still go and buy Bethesda stuff...
Some people like to keep the world burning.
Give it the fallout 4
- Yes
- Maybe (Yes)
- Sacrcastic (Yes)
- No
Dialogue
And by starfield we mean something with less gameplay than release NMS....
In other news, the Star Citizen devs are thinking of a game.
Bro did what trained monkies in Bethesda can't
This is amazing! Great Job Bro! 😂
bro why do you sound like carl from jimmy neutron...im here for it. i love it
It's 8am on a Sunday and thanks to your attitude in this video I am completely ready for the day. Thanks 😂
Honestly, you not only made better starfield, you made better elite dangerous too, amazing work!
Please add a compression filter to the master audio track of your videos.
"where is your god now?" probably in his bedroom making better games than EA
starfield... you made star citizen for 100% less then they did and probably works 100% better.
Yeah, this is not starfield, this is better.
EVEN THE DAMN SHOOTING FEELS BETTER SMH.
Now spawn 10000 toilet paper rolls with perfect physics spilling out of a room, then leave the planet and have them still be there, in their exact position, when you get back, all while there are dynamic NPCs and random events everywhere. (Though don't mistake that for me saying what you did here isn't impressive, because it is)
The flipside of this is listening to a podcast where they said they killed a bunch of dudes then came back later and the quest giver is just chilling with the dead bodies who never get moved or disappear.
@@DarkLightGaming117 lol yeah, I wasnt trying to imply one is better than the other. Just that everyone is talking about the graphical weaknesses of the Bethesda engine while ignoring every crazy thing it is technically capable of, like how your followers somehow have something to say for almost every questline and decision you make, or how dialogue for many quests will change if you did another quest prior or joined a certain group.
But yes, with so many things happening in the game you are bound to have dumb cases like that. They can account for many things but there's no way they can account for everything.
Wow. Just wow
Damn!!!!!😮 someone give this man the reigns at Bethesda or somewhere.. Please.
There are talented people all over the world, and then there is Todd Howard.
I dont think Todd wrote a single line of code in years.
@@TheCorrupt it's not about him writing anything, he is the director responsible for the rest of the team and general quality of his products. Every game made by Bethesda is his creation.
Imagine not doing planets the smoothbrain way.
You'll never be a an AAA dev
In what way would YOU do planets in YOUR game then?
r/whooosh@@maraudr9524
@@maraudr9524whoosh
U didnt make starfield u made no mans sky
in bathesta eyes , he just did 10 years work in a video
*Impressive, I delivered a Full Watch!* ⭐😃👍
Nice.
I'll make sure to inform to Bethesda of this. In a good way.
Yes... in a good way...
I bet they'll take whatever you say and make it NPC dialouge later on
This comment section hurts badly.. all the people that have 0 idea about game development running their mouths lol. This isn't even .001% compared to starfield
Using a sniper rifle to destroy a space ship is a bit much.
it's for demonstration purposes obviously.
Страшно представить чтобы вышло если бы у него было 48 дней
You made 1000 planets and seamless travel between them in 48 hours?
wheres the game at to download whats it called?
Todd: "Who cares if the game is good or not? The modders will fix it for us"
Thrill: *Builds a universally superior version and offers it for free*
Todd: "No, not like that"