Adox HR 50
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- A new chapter in film comparisons, I look at the differences between Kodak Tri-X as our standard and Adox HR-50. All films in these comparisons were shot using the same lighting and position, developed in Kodak D-76 using the manufacturer’s recommended time, and printed on Ilford Classic FB at 11x14 size using the same contrast settings. The printing time varied to cancel any changes in film base fog from film to film. I included the H&D curves for each film to see the individual differences and we look at the overall print, the spectral response of each film, and the grain characteristics.
Channel Merch, Discord, and more:
linktr.ee/The_...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thenakedphotographer
HR-50 is also a IR sensitive film when used with a R72 IR filter, you shoot at two stops less. ADOX also recommend development with their HR-Dev which increases the speed to iso 50 at least. I use this in my Olympus PEN f which is a half frame camera and can print much larger than you would normally expect.
Thank you for the review.
I watched so much of these b&w reviews, that I didn't even know that your eyes where suposed to be blue and not brown xD
his eyes are the color of metallic silver ;)
I slit it and use it in my Minox subminiature cameras. It’s currently the best film I’ve tried and I’ve tested many.
There is dedicated developer for this film to get more pictorial look, HR-DEV.
The ADOX datasheet for this film report that D76 development is not recommended... Where do you get the manufacturer’s recommended time for D76 development? 😀
Should’ve asked three years ago. I don’t remember anything about it now
What doesn’t come across in the video, at least it’s not emphasised, is whether there is anything smoother out there. Also, with no grain, it must be hard to retouch
Adox CMS 20
What's the tiny silver developer tabk?
Great information
Interesting video thanks.
Cms 20 next?
Cms 20 II in D76 with "regular" agitation will be interesting.
I use for Architecutral Photography. it is very high contrast. I am super Happy about it . But for me not for portraits . again it is very high contrast. but can be good for artistic approach. hope Cms 20 will be the next. Cheers to all BW film lovers !!!
wooow thank you so much ❤
It's a copy film? I thought CMS was the copy film and this - a pre-flashed aviphot... Now I'm confused. Nevertheless, a nice film for a specific use-case.
nice review
can we also have a fuji 400 vs ultramax please
Why would you compare the same film?
How do you determine their true film speed?
I use a device called a sensitometer to expose a set of very specific density patches that I read on another device called a densitometer and plot their density/exposures on a graph and use the ISO method for calculating film speed based off this curve and specific density points. This method is explained in the Kodak Sensitometry Workbook and my companion video series on the topic.
UA-cam compresses the ***t out of 1080p content - upload in 4k please!
its the same as rpx 25 both are aviphot pan 80
I've read that Rollei retro was Aviphot 80, funny that a lot of people claim Adox Silvermax is the old Agfapan 100, got to be something in what you're saying regarding HR50? Is this old Agfapan 25 I wonder?
@@tonyhirst3628 nope its not. there are a few comparisons online. Those two films respond differently in terms of contrast.
I’ve read many times that aviphot 80 was repackaged as rpx 25 and retro 80s and hr50
@@6hr0n05 thanks for the info