AMP 1/48 SA 314 / Ht 2 Gazelle Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @Phantomflyer56
    @Phantomflyer56 27 днів тому +3

    Hi Phil the RAF operated these as basic flying/handling helicopters with 2 FTS at RAF Shawbury. Looks a great kit and on my hit list with the sublime looking H-19 . The RAAF was just a decal added at Middle Wallop . Great review as always .

  • @guypenrose5477
    @guypenrose5477 27 днів тому +4

    Hi Phil - nice review. Just a small correction, the RAF don’t own Culdrose - it is a Royal Naval Air Station.

    • @PeteCourtier
      @PeteCourtier 27 днів тому

      And a two hour drive from Plymouth, so not far 😂

  • @danielburkett7835
    @danielburkett7835 27 днів тому

    Nice review, Phil. I can always count on you to give an honest opinion of how a model is, good AND bad!!

  • @PeterCawthorn
    @PeterCawthorn 27 днів тому +1

    These kits are such hard work

  • @lesthegringo
    @lesthegringo 27 днів тому +1

    I made a similar comment on your Airfix Sea King review - for the transparencies try UV cure jewelry resin, fantastic stuff for attaching and working with transparencies when you don't want to mess them up. Also, one of the skis is missing a leg

  • @TedsScaleModeling
    @TedsScaleModeling 27 днів тому +1

    Phil, it also looked like one of the supports on the landing skids is missing. Possibly a short shot.

  • @gillkitten1
    @gillkitten1 27 днів тому +2

    RAF Culdrose? RNAS Culdrose/HMS Seahawk please!

  • @alistairscott137
    @alistairscott137 26 днів тому

    Hi Phil nice review, I have the KM Kovozavody Prostejov 1:48 Gazelle AH.1 which I thought was a AMP kit but its not, just wondering which one is the best?

  • @adrianhawley4909
    @adrianhawley4909 27 днів тому

    Hi Phil the example shown at Rochester Airport is still flying and goes in and out of there periodically. Cheers Ade

  • @Mortlaker
    @Mortlaker 27 днів тому +1

    Hi Phil, just a quick observation. It looks like one of the rotor blades is damaged at the attachment end - could be a tricky fix.

    • @randalscott7224
      @randalscott7224 27 днів тому +1

      And one of the rear "legs" for the landing skids.

  • @brettwilson7155
    @brettwilson7155 27 днів тому +2

    RAF Culdrose ..... How dare you 🤣

    • @MisterHampshire
      @MisterHampshire 27 днів тому

      I thought it sounded like RNAS, which it is/was, although it was quick and could be mistaken for RAF.

  • @arthurrytis6010
    @arthurrytis6010 27 днів тому +1

    Wouldn't it be nice if more manufacturers put a 3D option in their kits. If AMP can do it so can the rest of them.

  • @peteradshead6566
    @peteradshead6566 27 днів тому

    Australian??? Sounds like complete fiction to me.

    • @paulkerry666
      @paulkerry666 23 дні тому

      Probably ex British machines that have been shipped to Aussie for private use.