voxelstudios -- Waste to Energy Plant in Mexico

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • Waste to Energy Plant in Mexico City, the first in Latin America and one of the biggest in the world in its category.
    Video presentation of the plant and description of the process to convert waste to energy.
    Find out more about voxelstudios: www.voxelstudio...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @tomkelly8827
    @tomkelly8827 5 років тому +18

    We need more of these in Canada too. Well done Mexico city, you are on the right track.
    If you want to get even more power out of the same amount of fuel, I hear combined cycle turbines are well worth the extra cost. A gas like propane is boiled at very low temperatures in the cooled flue gas after water has been boiled for the steam turbines. It is the same principal as a steam turbine just with a liquid that boils at a much lower temperature

  • @gdotone1
    @gdotone1 Місяць тому

    Mexico needs 10 of these.

  • @vanlinhnguyen4758
    @vanlinhnguyen4758 5 років тому +11

    how to get this model , great animation video , waste to energy wil be change the work we live in future .

  • @kamaruleffendi
    @kamaruleffendi 6 років тому +9

    Very nice animation!

  • @markbinnis6210
    @markbinnis6210 2 роки тому +11

    This project was cancelled. Expensive. CDMX decided to focus on waste reduction instead.

  • @-magedarqoub4390
    @-magedarqoub4390 2 роки тому +8

    Please can you tell me the cost of this project

  • @ek9772
    @ek9772 6 років тому +8

    How are you treating the dioxins, heavy metals, and waste water coming out of this facility?
    How do you prevent these contaminants from reaching subterranean aquifers or spreading through the air?

    • @StanleySweet14
      @StanleySweet14 5 років тому +10

      Over 800 degrees c is enough to eliminate most dioxins during the combustion process.

    • @Emperor9992001
      @Emperor9992001 5 років тому +3

      Not only are dioxins broken by such gasification but almost all toxic waste outside of radioactive waste can be broken down.

    • @williamrebune5588
      @williamrebune5588 5 років тому +7

      Pasquale Gelardi Take it easy. We learn everyday

    • @mistermood4164
      @mistermood4164 4 роки тому

      there a filtration system in the loop to reduce emissions

    • @seneca983
      @seneca983 4 роки тому +2

      @@Emperor9992001: Toxic waste that's a chemical element, like lead or mercury, cannot be broken down by heat and has to be filtered out somehow.

  • @0055-g3i
    @0055-g3i 4 місяці тому

    Excellent, Maybe you can use the RDF-5 to vanish the impact of circumstances

  • @Liberty_Freedom_Brotherhood
    @Liberty_Freedom_Brotherhood Рік тому +1

    Has this been built yet?

  • @danietkissenle
    @danietkissenle 2 роки тому +3

    Just so yalls know riverside CA had a plant like this 30 years ago, but our lovely unions and epa decided to get it shut down because they weren't making any money from it. It was a closed efficient plant that provided cheap clean power and politics and unions got it shutdown

    • @Determinedfollower
      @Determinedfollower Рік тому

      Dang. I hate when stuff like that happens.

    • @WJCTechyman
      @WJCTechyman Рік тому +2

      No, it wasn't the EPA or Unions, most likely the penny pinching of expensive executives and investors since everything is a commodity in the US due to deregulation and the unregulated free-market capitalism that you probably know (little about) and love. Also, that penny pinching would keep the emissions fairly high because that adds an extra expense to the whole process.

  • @yancyfaye
    @yancyfaye Рік тому

    Hi! can we use this video for educational purposes?? thank you.

  • @joshuawilson7201
    @joshuawilson7201 4 роки тому

    Who's doing the construction?

  • @universal8228
    @universal8228 4 роки тому +4

    wow...
    WTE power plant of Mexico generating 965,000MW per hour

    • @pastorgoof
      @pastorgoof 2 роки тому

      I was just wondering how is that possible I don't think there a power plant in the world that can produce that much electricity and to add insult to injury he say it can power 120,000 home

    • @garthwhite7845
      @garthwhite7845 Рік тому +1

      Has to be 96.5 MW

  • @santiagohenao3030
    @santiagohenao3030 7 років тому

    ¿Está planta no genera ningún tipo de contaminación al aire o al agua? ¿Esto es energía limpia o se produce alguna mínima cantidad de desechos?

    • @mauriciomontiel1493
      @mauriciomontiel1493 6 років тому +2

      Santiago Henao puedo decirte, que nosotros trabajamos en conjunto de otras plantas "COVANTA" ese su nombre de las otras plantas, es la manera mas facil de deshacerse de la basura, y la que menos deteriora el medio ambiente, produciendo electricidad, y convirtiendo los residuos hasta un 90% menos que el de un vertedero....si hace esto la ciudad es un gran beneficio, en estados unidos, almenos cada estado cuenta con 3 plantas, en cada estado, en elgunos hasta 8 plantas como el caso de florida, Massachusetts, maine entre otros estados....pero algo si es seguro, obtendremos beneficios de esta planta de energia.

    • @juanmanuelzunigapelaez6615
      @juanmanuelzunigapelaez6615 3 роки тому

      @@mauriciomontiel1493 cuentan con experiencias exitosas en latinoamérica waste to energy en ciudades donde no hay separación en la fuente?.

  • @isurumadhusankka1389
    @isurumadhusankka1389 Рік тому

    Anybody here operates reciprocating grate waste incinerator? I need to know in depth details. Please help

  • @gosula.amaralingeswararao8698
    @gosula.amaralingeswararao8698 2 роки тому

    Good information sir

  • @hendratakhansem
    @hendratakhansem Рік тому +3

    I will be the first to bring change in Indonesia

  • @dianalorena9477
    @dianalorena9477 5 років тому +1

    Un gran proyecto! Una pena que quieran frenarlo solo con argumentos políticos...

    • @heiwarish4330
      @heiwarish4330 4 роки тому

      entonces este proyecto no esta e proceso ya?

  • @MrY4li
    @MrY4li 3 роки тому +3

    Did he really say 965,000 MW ?

  • @jeraldsantosmunoz6273
    @jeraldsantosmunoz6273 3 роки тому

    Is it clean? Just like nuclear powerplants?

    • @WJCTechyman
      @WJCTechyman Рік тому

      Nowhere near. One of the beneficial byproducts of the Bruce Nuclear Power Plant in Ontario, Canada is it is a world supplier of medical and scientific isotopes. It is also the "flex fuel" equivalent to auto engines. It can take a variety of fission materials that conventional American plants can't.

  • @CuthbertNibbles
    @CuthbertNibbles 3 роки тому +4

    I like the animation, but...
    1:40 "965,000 MW per hour"

    • @ian74747
      @ian74747 3 роки тому

      Three Gorges Dam only produces 22,500 MW per hour.

    • @ericsperformanceparts1647
      @ericsperformanceparts1647 3 роки тому +2

      Probably meant to say 965 MW. 965 TW seems like a lot, but they did not say how big this plant was...

    • @rsinclair689
      @rsinclair689 3 роки тому

      Yeah that number is a little suspect.

  • @thegamechanger7157
    @thegamechanger7157 2 роки тому

    You could do it
    Yeah we do this on people comport but we need to change people and materials
    It takes time
    What can do

  • @instakillgaming
    @instakillgaming 3 роки тому +1

    it's steam? wouldn't it be smoke

    • @WJCTechyman
      @WJCTechyman Рік тому

      Through the combustion of garbage, that hot gas (with the soot that is smoke) passes through a boiler to take water and make it into steam for the turbine. This technology has been used for over 200 years to varying degrees. It first started in Britain for pumping water, then made it into vehicles like trains and then into ships as well as power plants for factories. Along the way, the technology has been improved but mainly used these days for generating electric power and some niche applications with hobbyists.

  • @wade5941
    @wade5941 2 роки тому

    This makes so much sense. Kinda odd that the greens are not pushing this technology.

    • @WJCTechyman
      @WJCTechyman Рік тому

      Probably because the facts outweighed the benefits. Like coal, combustion of garbage has some nasty by-products. That said, if there were regulations on what kind of garbage is permitted to be burned so separating that can be somewhat problematic.

  • @yuv8482
    @yuv8482 3 роки тому +1

    How much does it cost to build ?

    • @Tacoman1967
      @Tacoman1967 2 роки тому +1

      We can't afford to not build it.

    • @Utkarshgg
      @Utkarshgg Рік тому +1

      By textbook, it should cost 650-1000 dollars per tonne of waste

  • @rockrock8182
    @rockrock8182 3 роки тому

    This is Singapore

  • @sadiazia4103
    @sadiazia4103 6 років тому +1

    Cost of the project

  • @scottcharney1091
    @scottcharney1091 Рік тому

    He said "fluid discharge."

  • @julianpuzzo6559
    @julianpuzzo6559 3 роки тому

    Dioxinas para todos...