Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
The Twelfth century renaissance | Medieval Science History part 2.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 чер 2019
- In this series, we’re going to cover the intriguing history of science in medieval Europe. Medieval science is a subject that’s vital in understanding the great achievements of the scientific revolution yet is despite that is often forgotten in popular history. This is the story of the precarious survival of classical learning in the dark ages and early middle ages as well as the rise of the universities and the translation movements in the high middle ages.
In this video, we will continue our discovery of the history of science in the medieval period by covering the twelfth century renaissance in Europe. This will include the birth of the European urban schools, the medieval translation movement as well as the rise of the medieval university. I hope you learn something new about medieval history and the history of science from this medieval science documentary series.
Recommended literature.
- God's Philosophers by James Hannam. Link: amzn.to/3dpvwkI
- The Beginnings of western science by David Lindberg. Link: amzn.to/3drKWF3
Wondering what programs I use to make my videos?
After Effects = The program I use to animate my videos. Link: amzn.to/2uBHtU1
Photoshop = The program I use to create my thumbnails and some of the maps I use.
Link: amzn.to/2VrvymQ
Blue Ice Yeti = The mike I use to record my videos. Link: amzn.to/384S3R6
DISCLAIMER: This video-description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I will receive a small commission.
Photo credits.
Eric Molina.
Houston Physicists/Wikipedia.
G.Hagedorn
Note: I try to use copyright free images and stock footage at all times. However, if I have used any of your artwork or video content then please don't hesitate to contact me and I’ll be more than happy to give the appropriate credit.
Mail: inkhistorycontact@gmail.com
Sources.
The beginnings of western science(David C Lindberg, 2007).
Science and religion 400 B.C - 1550 A.D(Edward Grant, 2004).
#middleages
See the whole series at: ua-cam.com/video/HZLmr2IdrJc/v-deo.html
See part 1 on History of Science in the early middle ages: ua-cam.com/video/HZLmr2IdrJc/v-deo.html
See part 3 on the History of Medival Astronomy: ua-cam.com/video/UzwC6Wr9SQo/v-deo.html
See part 4 on the history of medieval medicine: ua-cam.com/video/lg1R0M7AdaU/v-deo.html&t
See part 5 on religion and science in medieval Europe: ua-cam.com/video/rtwbhdUveEA/v-deo.html
excellent introduction to an INCREDIBLE topic
People forget that the science that developed in the Medieval world of the 12th century eventually lead to the beginning of modern science as we know it (this is known as the 'Continuity Thesis'). This was an excellent Quill and Ink History! I mean to get back to studying Medieval history (among the many other historical topics I take interest in). I just got done with taking two American-U.S. History courses, one that goes from the pre-Contact era to the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and another that goes from post-Reconstruction to the Present (both were requirements).
Lately, I've been taking an interest in Macrohistorical topics - or why and how the world came to be as it is. I've been reading Jared Diamond's 'controversial' "Guns, Germs and Steel", which goes over why peoples of Eurasia were much more advanced (technologically speaking) than the peoples of the New World (the Americas), Oceania, the Arctic, and most of Sub-Saharan Africa; why institutional development was much further along in Eurasia (not AT ALL making the aforementioned peoples of the New World, Oceania, and the Arctic "inferior" in any manner as people); and also why disease so devastated the peoples of the New World but not the other way (in other words, why "Montezuma's Revenge" - i.e. SEVERE diarrhea didn't kill off 90-95 percent of the people in Eurasia). Something like "why did modern science and the university system have its roots in the Medieval period?" (contrary to claims about the Middle Ages being "the Dark Ages") is something I would definitely count as Macrohistorical.
But right now, I'm glad I'm reading Diamond's book. As I've always wondered (me being half indigenous) - and from Alaska, which was the one geographical region in the Americas not colonized not by the Spanish, French, English, or Portuguese, but by Russia - why when the Russians did come in the very late 18th century: they had flintlock firearms, advanced ships and complex metallurgy? (despite Russia being the most backwards of all the European powers). But the indigenous Alaskans didn't have any of these, generally? Diamond's book helps answer a lot of these kind of "controversial" (they shouldn't be) questions.
And of course for US History. No interest of American history that I gained from studying it can be ignored without reading Samuel P. Huntington's "Who Are We?" Reading him explain how American culture is uniquely and historically Anglocentric and that required Americanization of incoming immigrants in the late 19th and 20th century (before the official 1960s onward commitment to 'Multiculturalism') is what made the United State's immigration program work out so well is very contemporary to modern America I feel. Because we as Americans are going through an immense cultural and national identity crisis...
Great video Quill! I hate the common belief of the "dark ages", which is just plain wrong, so I appreciate you discussing it.
Happy you liked it Barris! :)
@@quillinkhistory9539 is it true that Christians burned some books? And if they did what books would those have been?
Mycket bra, fler videos på gång? 😍
Nice. This is was very much needed and enjoyed.
Happy you liked it Derelict! :)
Very good, illustrating, thank you.
Thank you. Very much. These historical development are very telling, insightful, into the way of how societies evolves sociopolitically, and culturally; exposing also relations between political and cultural development and the essence that comprises social existence, and its pillars. Your classes or courses, views into our history are nicely and easily understood.
Statistics show that in the years 1000-1500 had the fastest economic growth in the world (73% compared to -0,3% in Islamic World and 28% in China - PKB per capita), some places have economic levels that weren't surpassed till 19th century. Medieval times had also higher life expentancy than Roman times (31 to 27 years) and greatest technological and scientific development in Europe since hellenistic epoch. In Kardashev-Sagan scale it would be k=0,4 compered to 0,25 in Ancient Rome and rised to k=0,5 during industrial revolution. Population growth was also high it rised 170% in Christianitas compered to 2,8% in Islamic World or 74% in China.
May I ask what scholarship those claims are based upon?
@@quillinkhistory9539 As far as I'm concerned most statistics concerning GPD and population growth are based upon reaserch done by professor Angus Maddison from University of Groningen. "Statistics on World Population, GDP, and Per Capita GDP 1-2008 AD." www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-database-2010
Kardashev scale is based upon energy produced by a civilization. It is not very specified scale but it can be estimated as higher than Rome because of wide introduction of such things like horse collars, watermills, windmills, three-field system, iron plough, smelters etc. reaching 0,4. The life expectancy I found on different sites and about different countries but it was often higher for Middle Ages than Ancient Greece and Rome. I should be less precise in that instance.
@@TheGeneralGrievous19 Sorry for a late response. Thanks for sharing the links, I will try to look at it when I get the time.
Finally !!!!!
Finally pt 2!
I know, been a rough couple of months but I should be able to go back to my regular upload schedule now during the summer! What did you think about the video btw? :)
Quill & Ink History yeah I feel you I got exams until the 26th. So after that I can go back to more videos. Though I finally published a video finally
As for the video amazing as always really nice animations and music
Cool
I am uploading soon !!!!
DON'T MISS IT OUT
CHEERS !!!!
Oh no, I had to subscribe to another amazing historical channel. I have a problem. 😁
Haha, I know the feeling, it's always tedious when that happens^^
Water weel wasn't invented in that time (it date back to Rome ), but it did get improvements as well as the presence of other progress in mill technology.
No.
TIL that Indians scholars were roasting peanuts at Nalanda & Vikramshila till 12th century when Bologna was just conceptualused.
Avicenna the most important Medieval philosopher in the Islamic, Jewish and Christian realm
No..He is only one of them. There were far better contemperory philosophers than him and even he was considered a herectic by your sharia court of that time..
Lol the 12th century is not the Renaiscence. That would be in s.xvi. You got all wrong. This video is a real mess
First learn the proper spelling. Second he meant 12th century was the beginning of universities which would lead to 15th century renaissance
12th C. renaissance was a separate event from the 15th C. renaissance