Dr. Sherwin does an awesome job in informing us of the design of God's creatures. Nowhere else do i hear about the creation and learn lots and lots about creatures from a biblical viewpoint.
Great teaching, thank both of you very much for sharing. May God Bless you, your loved ones, and everyone who hears this message. The Spirit and the Bride say, Come Lord Jesus...
Dr. Frank Sherwin is such a smart man, he knows so much about these animals and so many more, and he didn't need to look up any of the answers that he gave to so many questions. I must say that he truly earned his degree. I don't understand why these so-called geniuses would rather think that we are all related to an ancient ancestral life form, rather than the obvious conclusion that we are all created by the same divine Designer, and He uses the exact same set of chemicals to store and transmit the data required to replicate life in all of the multivarious forms found here on Earth. I mean it just makes so much more sense to believe in the Lord Yeshua Messiah and His omnipotent, omniscient intelligence, and to give Him honor and praise and glory for all of the creation, than to ascribe such power to the inanimate creation itself.
I hope you are right, I think one of the reasons is, that there are some "design errors" of which you "could" conclude, that an intelligent designer could have done this better... - for example with whales, why is their flippers looking like a hand... That is also quite disturbing to me, although I think you are right! Greetings..
@@Rambo-iz4yw Did you know whales (and all marine mammals like seals and manatees) still have the unexpressed Tbx4 genes for producing hind limbs? That's why we still occasionally see atavistic hind limbs on cetaceans. That's kinda silly for an omnipotent Designer but makes perfect sense with evolution.
My 9-year-old grandson who lives in Guatemala where we live now wanted me to listen to this podcast with him. He had already listened to it and he wanted me to listen with him again. I had trouble concentrating being his 64-year-old grandma so I'm listening to it at home. It's awesome!
In the past i would explain to the crew that “parts are parts” ie. Imagine a tornado blowing through a wrecking yard, and out comes a fully functioning car, then an airplane…my crew understood a car has wheels, skin, an engine,, etc. it was just how they were put together.. using this example, i explained that while that tornado could not do that, they got the idea, that intelligent design is a very real thing…
@@RobertA-up9ur Sounds exactly like one. And whether you believe in evolution or not should not have a bearing on it- as Evolution is the explanation that fits the facts, not this nonsense.
Great video! The fact that darwinism has been debunked should be a source of encouragement for atheists. It means you are not a random monkey mistake. It means your great, great, great... grandkids won't grow scales and swim off into the ocean never to be seen again. It means you were designed by the most intelligent mind in the universe with a loving purpose. Please accept the love; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).
@@UserRandJ Atheists don't believe humans are a random monkey mistake. How ignorant. You don't even know what you are trying to argue against. Maybe generations in the future will need scales, who knows. Not us. Please, if you are going to argue, at least get the opposing point of view correct. We are descended from an ape-like creature. Not a monkey. They are two separate things.
Of course not. Seaweed is an algae, not an animal. This is a bit like the "if we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?" question. Do I need to go into more detail?
@@docsavage30 But according to evolutionists, seaweed, bacteria, viruses and every other living thing evolved from the same original basic organisms that humans did, right?
@@docsavage30 You need to pay attention and not make a big deal about nothing. Not direct connected on the tree of life does not matter!!!!!!!!!!!! All things being connected is what matters. Imagine an angle. The points on the lines making the angle are A and B. The point where the lines meet is C. SavedbyGraceAlone1962 named point A and B. You had a fit because there is a point C. Your pouting about point C does not undo the connection between A and B. It also does not make any of those connections reality.
Jellyfish are used in various parts of Asia. They can be cut into a type of noodle and used in cold salads for crunch or added to hot dishescto absorb the surrounding flavors
Little Earthworm under the ground You see no sight, you hear no sound. You dig out tunnels down beneath Without the benefit of teeth. You have no eyes, nor ears, nor hands Yet it behooves us to understand How, with attributes so few, They named a planet after you! (~ Wiley the Poet, a character in B.C., a comic strip created by Johnny Hart.)
Q: If mutation by random leads to evolution, and change is very small (say1 in billion for one successful mutation? ), it mean the new version my replicate a billion times (given and take) to produce the next version with v1 mutual inheritance. That mean of each peace of progress, you everytime needs a billion offspring. Imagine the number of offsprings require to come up with a complex feature. And where are fossil records of these billion!
I never considered that before - that the fact that everything has DNA proves a designer not common ancestry ... If indeed EVOLUTION were true and that life and NATURAL SELECTION held the keys to creation you MUST believe if life forms were so malleable and so keen to upend working systems for something better THEN you would expect to find other variances of coding for building blocks of life ...... Where is the NATURAL SELECTION CHOOSING " ZPNA " instead of DNA.... I thnk that's a darn good question if I don't humbly say so myself .
I wouldn't get so hung up on the term "starfish", we also have jellyfish, crayfish, cuttlefish, etc., doesn't mean they have to look like trout and sea bass.
In another reply below, you said that sponges are animals not plants. Yeah, we knew that. You talked about their celia and flagella and other things. Then you said that was all the result of evolution. Just describing the complexities of a living creature doesn’t prove evolution! Look at a skyscraper. You could describe its complexities in detail too. Would that show it slowly evolved overtime? No, it shows that it had had some intelligent design behind it. In order to prove evolution for sponges, you would have to have some evidence, which you totally evaded even mentioning. There are countless fossils of sponges, many millions, maybe billions of them. There is the evidence for you. But you are ignoring it. For a fantasy. The data clearly shows that all the sponges stay sponges, and nothing else. Try to find a single one that shows a sponge turning into or out of anything else but a sponge. You won’t reply on that. Wake up. Richard Dawkins is really insulting you when he suggests that you came from things like sponges and jellyfish. Even though, again, the fossil record shows the exact opposite of what he is claiming. Wake up. See the obvious. Find out who you really are. It’s not a sponge or bacteria or fish or Lucy update. That is all pseudoscience scam.
@@loricalass4068 look at the development of a human embryo. First a collection of cells, but unlike sponges you see the next stage that those cells form three layers: ecto-, endo- and mesoderm. Similar to jellyfish
@loricalass4068 - sponges reproduce, buildings don't. Compared to more primitive multicellular organisms:, cells of Sponges differentiate. Jellyfish is more advanced because they perform gastrulation, i.e. forming a stomach. Worms went further by turning that stomach into a digestive track. You need to understand evolution
Let's understand more context in the creation evolution discussion. =). If evolution is fact it must have a factual origins, sufficient cause, beginning. =). A group of scientists return to their lab and cheerfully declare to other colleagues that they have found a possibly, unknown never before existing species of 'insert scientific jargon here'. What follows for the scientist delegated this task, operation? Well, more exams, studies, and scientific operations would follow. On what? On the factually existing species (of whatever). Why? Because science to produce reality relevant and reality based results cannot be conducted on 'possibly, unknown, never before existing' anything! There's nothing to conduct the science on! This is the fallacy with the 'science of/for evolution'. Evolution is a story (nothing to conduct reality relevant, reality based operations on! Think folks! The science by evolutionists is not supposed to be showing us how things work, etc. Its supposed to be showing us HOW ALL THE FACTUALLY EXISTING REALITY ARRIVES IN THE FIRST PLACE! My emphasis added. =).
@@torahtrucker Yep, arbitrary rules like food purity coupled with rules that help the community like avoiding greed. The Bible is ahodge podge is the best you can sa.
Nice 00:20 in and you've admitted we are linked to sponges by DNA, thanks for reasserting evolution is true and magic spell casting is false. Good night everybody. 😅
It says a lot that the worlds intellectuals adopt the faith of evolution. Its almost as if the Bible is right when it says that the truth is foolishness to the unregenerate.
I like your videos, but a snapping shrimp cannot break aquarium glass, or cause injuries to humans. The snap produces 210 decibels under water, but it’s localized and sounds more like the snap you hear from rice krispies. Not sure why he said all those things were true. 😞
@@Rambo-iz4yw I'm just fascinated by the phenomenon of creationists bending over backwards to hand-wave away science which contradicts their religious beliefs. 🙂ETA sorry for the mixed metaphors.
Another round of an Atheist who CLEARLY doesn't understand the first thing about biochemistry and thinking it could have all just happened by dumb luck. Sorry, but you're asking way too much from luck.
Let me guess. You looked at the data and concluded "My Favourite Wizard did it." Just like every single time, without fail, right? PS If evolution isn't a thing, why is it observable?
I think that you are confusing programmed variations with evolution. Alleles can produce multitudes of variations that work. Random mutations tend to be neutral to detrimental. Thus they fail to produce any advancements in forms of life.
@@roblangsdorf8758 Mutations can also produce new alleles which can be beneficial and spread through the population. That's exactly what happened with the famous peppered moths in England. A mutation in 1819 produced an allele creating a dark form of the moth instead of the previous ones which were all light colored. The dark mutation was so beneficial in the soot covered areas of the industrial revolution in less than 50 years it made up 95% of the moth population.
@kittykatters3972 Kitty, Within the last few years, I have read an article about how the white version replaced the black version now that the cities have managed to get rid of the pollution. We see this type of reversion in blind cave fish in a very short period of time. This is not due to neo-Darwinism. Rather, it is evidence of programming.
God calls shrimp and crustaceans unclean. The world calls them delicious just like everything Jesus says dont do the world is saying and doing the opposite. We are paying the price for our disobedience as we are warned in Leviticus 26.
@@Hamann9631 Y'all can't even agree on what the Bible actually says, but are certain that scientific processes we have mountains of evidence for are untrue. Yep, that checks out...
@@nathancook2852 You used bad logic. The difference of opinion within one group of people does not prove the other group is true. People who do not know that Toyota and Honda own factories in the United States of America and people who know that arguing over where Toyotas and Hondas are made do not prove that Toyotas and Hondas are the result of random chance without a designer. If there were mountains of evidence, we would have seen it. There are mountains of evidence for speciation and the round earth; but, that evidence does not prove all life having a common ancestor. That evidence does not prove a working body system can be the result of random mutations.
Sponges are animal, not plants. They have Cilia/flagella But missing the three layers as in all the other multicellular animals. Result of evolution, not design
Well, I found this disappointing. As usual the arguments are against pseudoscience that has been discarded. Also, to argue with absurd statements not founded in truth. Disappointing. But I'll keep looking.
Dr. Sherwin does an awesome job in informing us of the design of God's creatures. Nowhere else do i hear about the creation and learn lots and lots about creatures from a biblical viewpoint.
WOW! Totally fascinating! Thanks so much.
Great teaching, thank both of you very much for sharing. May God Bless you, your loved ones, and everyone who hears this message. The Spirit and the Bride say, Come Lord Jesus...
Incrdible explain about miraculous life of those invertebrates. Thank you.
I wish to thank you for sharing this informational Podcast video with me . Amen
Dr. Frank Sherwin is such a smart man, he knows so much about these animals and so many more, and he didn't need to look up any of the answers that he gave to so many questions. I must say that he truly earned his degree. I don't understand why these so-called geniuses would rather think that we are all related to an ancient ancestral life form, rather than the obvious conclusion that we are all created by the same divine Designer, and He uses the exact same set of chemicals to store and transmit the data required to replicate life in all of the multivarious forms found here on Earth. I mean it just makes so much more sense to believe in the Lord Yeshua Messiah and His omnipotent, omniscient intelligence, and to give Him honor and praise and glory for all of the creation, than to ascribe such power to the inanimate creation itself.
Agreed, and the incredible amount of symbiosis among living organisms that absolutely required divine foresight on a mindboggling level.
I hope you are right, I think one of the reasons is, that there are some "design errors" of which you "could" conclude, that an intelligent designer could have done this better... - for example with whales, why is their flippers looking like a hand... That is also quite disturbing to me, although I think you are right! Greetings..
@@Rambo-iz4yw Did you know whales (and all marine mammals like seals and manatees) still have the unexpressed Tbx4 genes for producing hind limbs? That's why we still occasionally see atavistic hind limbs on cetaceans. That's kinda silly for an omnipotent Designer but makes perfect sense with evolution.
Obviously because they prefer not to be answerable to God.
Because humanity is fallen from God.
Wow. I love learning new things about animals. ICR never disappoints.
My 9-year-old grandson who lives in Guatemala where we live now wanted me to listen to this podcast with him. He had already listened to it and he wanted me to listen with him again. I had trouble concentrating being his 64-year-old grandma so I'm listening to it at home. It's awesome!
God bless you ICR! Praying for your strength 🙏🙏🙏
In the past i would explain to the crew that “parts are parts” ie. Imagine a tornado blowing through a wrecking yard, and out comes a fully functioning car, then an airplane…my crew understood a car has wheels, skin, an engine,, etc. it was just how they were put together.. using this example, i explained that while that tornado could not do that, they got the idea, that intelligent design is a very real thing…
I enjoy this program so much. God bless you!
ABC (at 19:10) = Anything But Creation 😀 I hadn't heard that one before.
ICR is an oasis in an evolution desert. Thank you
It's a mirage.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu eternity isn't a mirage
@@RobertA-up9ur Sounds exactly like one. And whether you believe in evolution or not should not have a bearing on it- as Evolution is the explanation that fits the facts, not this nonsense.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu much to the contrary
All creation certainly declares God's glory \o/ Thanks for this wonderful program!
You're quite welcome! God bless you.
Great video! The fact that darwinism has been debunked should be a source of encouragement for atheists. It means you are not a random monkey mistake. It means your great, great, great... grandkids won't grow scales and swim off into the ocean never to be seen again. It means you were designed by the most intelligent mind in the universe with a loving purpose. Please accept the love; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).
Que? "Darwinism" hasn't been the scientific consensus for close to a hundred years.
@kittykatters3972 You're right, now it's just completely made up as the days go by. J
@@UserRandJ Atheists don't believe humans are a random monkey mistake. How ignorant. You don't even know what you are trying to argue against. Maybe generations in the future will need scales, who knows. Not us. Please, if you are going to argue, at least get the opposing point of view correct. We are descended from an ape-like creature. Not a monkey. They are two separate things.
You mean humans and seaweed DON'T have a common ancestor? 😂
Of course not. Seaweed is an algae, not an animal. This is a bit like the "if we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?" question. Do I need to go into more detail?
@@docsavage30 But according to evolutionists, seaweed, bacteria, viruses and every other living thing evolved from the same original basic organisms that humans did, right?
@@docsavage30 You need to pay attention and not make a big deal about nothing. Not direct connected on the tree of life does not matter!!!!!!!!!!!! All things being connected is what matters.
Imagine an angle. The points on the lines making the angle are A and B. The point where the lines meet is C. SavedbyGraceAlone1962 named point A and B. You had a fit because there is a point C. Your pouting about point C does not undo the connection between A and B. It also does not make any of those connections reality.
@@mattbrook-lee7732 OK, I edited the comment to be more accurate. Still just as absurd and humorous.😂
@@TearDownThisWall Great comment!
Jellyfish are used in various parts of Asia. They can be cut into a type of noodle and used in cold salads for crunch or added to hot dishescto absorb the surrounding flavors
Little Earthworm under the ground
You see no sight, you hear no sound.
You dig out tunnels down beneath
Without the benefit of teeth.
You have no eyes, nor ears, nor hands
Yet it behooves us to understand
How, with attributes so few,
They named a planet after you!
(~ Wiley the Poet, a character in B.C., a comic strip created by Johnny Hart.)
Q: If mutation by random leads to evolution, and change is very small (say1 in billion for one successful mutation? ), it mean the new version my replicate a billion times (given and take) to produce the next version with v1 mutual inheritance. That mean of each peace of progress, you everytime needs a billion offspring. Imagine the number of offsprings require to come up with a complex feature. And where are fossil records of these billion!
1/64 of all mutations creates a new protein coding gene.
I've seen videos of octopus miming other creatures for defense
I never considered that before - that the fact that everything has DNA proves a designer not common ancestry ...
If indeed EVOLUTION were true and that life and NATURAL SELECTION held the keys to creation you MUST believe if life forms were so malleable and so keen to upend working systems for something better THEN you would expect to find other variances of coding for building blocks of life ......
Where is the NATURAL SELECTION CHOOSING
" ZPNA " instead of DNA....
I thnk that's a darn good question if I don't humbly say so myself .
I wouldn't get so hung up on the term "starfish", we also have jellyfish, crayfish, cuttlefish, etc., doesn't mean they have to look like trout and sea bass.
@MazePage Good point. I these presenters might agree with us. However, there are official names of those animals.
25:00 jellyfish are eaten as Dim Sum.
In another reply below, you said that sponges are animals not plants. Yeah, we knew that. You talked about their celia and flagella and other things.
Then you said that was all the result of evolution. Just describing the complexities of a living creature doesn’t prove evolution!
Look at a skyscraper. You could describe its complexities in detail too. Would that show it slowly evolved overtime? No, it shows that it had had some intelligent design behind it.
In order to prove evolution for sponges, you would have to have some evidence, which you totally evaded even mentioning.
There are countless fossils of sponges, many millions, maybe billions of them.
There is the evidence for you. But you are ignoring it. For a fantasy. The data clearly shows that all the sponges stay sponges, and nothing else. Try to find a single one that shows a sponge turning into or out of anything else but a sponge. You won’t reply on that.
Wake up. Richard Dawkins is really insulting you when he suggests that you came from things like sponges and jellyfish. Even though, again, the fossil record shows the exact opposite of what he is claiming.
Wake up. See the obvious. Find out who you really are. It’s not a sponge or bacteria or fish or Lucy update. That is all pseudoscience scam.
@@loricalass4068 look at the development of a human embryo. First a collection of cells, but unlike sponges you see the next stage that those cells form three layers: ecto-, endo- and mesoderm. Similar to jellyfish
@loricalass4068 - sponges reproduce, buildings don't. Compared to more primitive multicellular organisms:, cells of Sponges differentiate. Jellyfish is more advanced because they perform gastrulation, i.e. forming a stomach. Worms went further by turning that stomach into a digestive track. You need to understand evolution
"It will always be unknown." Yeah, just like Lucy will always be unknown, huh?
Lucy is a fraud
I am happy and proud to call sponges my earliest relatives! They were a lot more honorable than many of my modern-day human fellow earth inhabitants.
Noooo! Back up!!! If the earthworm regenerates itself, are the two new animals identical? Are these two earthworms distinguishable by their DNA??
Let's understand more context in the creation evolution discussion. =).
If evolution is fact it must have a factual origins, sufficient cause, beginning. =).
A group of scientists return to their lab and cheerfully declare to other colleagues that they have found a possibly, unknown never before existing species of 'insert scientific jargon here'. What follows for the scientist delegated this task, operation? Well, more exams, studies, and scientific operations would follow. On what? On the factually existing species (of whatever). Why? Because science to produce reality relevant and reality based results cannot be conducted on 'possibly, unknown, never before existing' anything! There's nothing to conduct the science on! This is the fallacy with the 'science of/for evolution'. Evolution is a story (nothing to conduct reality relevant, reality based operations on! Think folks! The science by evolutionists is not supposed to be showing us how things work, etc. Its supposed to be showing us HOW ALL THE FACTUALLY EXISTING REALITY ARRIVES IN THE FIRST PLACE! My emphasis added. =).
Why does this confirm creation?
The Bible states shrimp are not food.
And yet they are so delicious.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu so is loose sex, and greed, and many other things that are not Godly.
@@torahtrucker Yep, arbitrary rules like food purity coupled with rules that help the community like avoiding greed. The Bible is ahodge podge is the best you can sa.
✝️🕊🕯❤🙏☦🕊
👍🙏🦕❤️
We are created in the image of God
Nice 00:20 in and you've admitted we are linked to sponges by DNA, thanks for reasserting evolution is true and magic spell casting is false. Good night everybody. 😅
It says a lot that the worlds intellectuals adopt the faith of evolution. Its almost as if the Bible is right when it says that the truth is foolishness to the unregenerate.
I like your videos, but a snapping shrimp cannot break aquarium glass, or cause injuries to humans.
The snap produces 210 decibels under water, but it’s localized and sounds more like the snap you hear from rice krispies. Not sure why he said all those things were true. 😞
Another round of "I don't understand it therefore GAWDDIDIT", Episode 45,728.
Yup. . Making it so scientific. . Worms octopus, man. . All complex and don't help the mind. Jus spins into brain damage.. lol.
what brings you back again for Episode 45,728? If you are bothered by it?
@@Rambo-iz4yw I'm just fascinated by the phenomenon of creationists bending over backwards to hand-wave away science which contradicts their religious beliefs. 🙂ETA sorry for the mixed metaphors.
It's complex - so it must be wizards. There's no other option, here in the Bronze Age.
Another round of an Atheist who CLEARLY doesn't understand the first thing about biochemistry and thinking it could have all just happened by dumb luck. Sorry, but you're asking way too much from luck.
Let me guess. You looked at the data and concluded "My Favourite Wizard did it." Just like every single time, without fail, right? PS If evolution isn't a thing, why is it observable?
I think that you are confusing programmed variations with evolution. Alleles can produce multitudes of variations that work. Random mutations tend to be neutral to detrimental. Thus they fail to produce any advancements in forms of life.
Hi Rob, What happens to the frequency of beneficial mutations, over time, when they occur in a population?@@roblangsdorf8758
@@roblangsdorf8758 Mutations can also produce new alleles which can be beneficial and spread through the population. That's exactly what happened with the famous peppered moths in England. A mutation in 1819 produced an allele creating a dark form of the moth instead of the previous ones which were all light colored. The dark mutation was so beneficial in the soot covered areas of the industrial revolution in less than 50 years it made up 95% of the moth population.
My friend, evolution, if true, produced us who say that evolution is false, yes? It is destroying itself, yes? If not then please explain. Thanks.
@kittykatters3972 Kitty, Within the last few years, I have read an article about how the white version replaced the black version now that the cities have managed to get rid of the pollution.
We see this type of reversion in blind cave fish in a very short period of time. This is not due to neo-Darwinism. Rather, it is evidence of programming.
God calls shrimp and crustaceans unclean. The world calls them delicious just like everything Jesus says dont do the world is saying and doing the opposite. We are paying the price for our disobedience as we are warned in Leviticus 26.
johnmonk9297, however after that something happened. Around 33 AD the law was fulfilled. Those are now allowed foods.
@@Hamann9631 Y'all can't even agree on what the Bible actually says, but are certain that scientific processes we have mountains of evidence for are untrue. Yep, that checks out...
@@nathancook2852 You used bad logic. The difference of opinion within one group of people does not prove the other group is true.
People who do not know that Toyota and Honda own factories in the United States of America and people who know that arguing over where Toyotas and Hondas are made do not prove that Toyotas and Hondas are the result of random chance without a designer.
If there were mountains of evidence, we would have seen it. There are mountains of evidence for speciation and the round earth; but, that evidence does not prove all life having a common ancestor. That evidence does not prove a working body system can be the result of random mutations.
Sponges are animal, not plants. They have Cilia/flagella But missing the three layers as in all the other multicellular animals. Result of evolution, not design
You wish
Well, I found this disappointing. As usual the arguments are against pseudoscience that has been discarded. Also, to argue with absurd statements not founded in truth. Disappointing. But I'll keep looking.
Evolution is pseudoscience!