This Bird Is Evolving Right in Front of Us

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 кві 2024
  • Florida’s snail kites are evolving right in front of us.
    Please LIKE and SUBSCRIBE if you enjoyed it! bit.ly/1Adl6ht​
    *More info & videos below*
    “Extreme Lives | Raptors: A Fistful of Daggers“ premieres April 17, 2024, at 8|7c on PBS and UA-cam.
    ---------------
    For full NATURE episodes, check out www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episod...
    Facebook: / pbsnature
    Twitter: / pbsnature
    TikTok: / pbsnature
    Instagram: / pbsnature
    -----------------
    Nature is a production of The WNET Group for PBS. Throughout its history, Nature has brought the natural world to millions of viewers. The PBS series has been consistently among the most-watched primetime series on public television.
    -----------------
    In the early 2000s, an invasive snail species took over these Florida wetlands. These invasive snails were too big for many of Florida's snail kites to consume, so many birds vanished. But ten years later, these birds have made an unbelievable recovery.
    -----------------
    More videos:
    Bee Mating Ritual Caught on Camera - • Bee Mating Ritual Caug...
    Bullfrog Dad Protects His Tadpoles - • Bullfrog Dad Protects ...
    Leopard Hunts Baboon in Broad Daylight - • Leopard Hunts Baboon i...
    Meet the Deadliest Cat on the Planet - • Meet the Deadliest Cat...
    Octopus Dreaming - • Octopus Dreaming
    FOLLOW PBS:
    Facebook: / ​
    Twitter: / pbs​
    Instagram: / pbs​
    Shop: www.shop.pbs.org/
  • Домашні улюбленці та дикі тварини

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @zibbitybibbitybop
    @zibbitybibbitybop Місяць тому +729

    Snails: "Haha, we're too big for you to eat us"
    Birds: *GET SWOLE*

  • @GGoAwayy
    @GGoAwayy Місяць тому +793

    The slow motion shots of how they use their wings to just suspend over the water while they wash off the snail and get a good grip on it are really cool looking.

    • @Danika_Nadzan
      @Danika_Nadzan Місяць тому +52

      The energy and power it takes to hover, then take off from a partially submerged position, while hauling those heavy snails is astonishing...and the slo-mo really shows that!

    • @user-hh3ew3oe6t
      @user-hh3ew3oe6t Місяць тому

      The power of white compels you
      Fentanyl fossil fuels Jan Sex! CO2
      Jenny Harlan Crowe Mitochondrial Eve N selection House Mother
      ua-cam.com/video/CJdT6QcSbQ0/v-deo.html

    • @Krankenwagen571
      @Krankenwagen571 Місяць тому +6

      Osprey and other diving birds could also have great success in that environment

    • @MUUTDITTSPOUMN
      @MUUTDITTSPOUMN Місяць тому +1

      I thought it was fake. CGI

    • @Ojb_1959
      @Ojb_1959 Місяць тому +6

      That’s not slow motion. They’ve evolved to maneuver much slower than before. Pretty amazing!

  • @ronkirk5099
    @ronkirk5099 Місяць тому +366

    With most of the bird species in the everglades just a tiny fraction of the former populations, it is encouraging to see that the snail kites may be adapting to take advantage of an invasive species. Now if the gators would just develop a taste for python.

    • @karensprings4237
      @karensprings4237 Місяць тому +8

      Or people do.

    • @lildarkmatter8373
      @lildarkmatter8373 Місяць тому +58

      Gators do have a taste for python, but there are so many pythons and they can get so big that many can kill gators as well.

    • @clwbchbabycakes
      @clwbchbabycakes Місяць тому +1

      Exactly what I was thinking.....

    • @itookallthenames
      @itookallthenames Місяць тому +10

      @@lildarkmatter8373that’s a shame, we need the gators to get swole

    • @lildarkmatter8373
      @lildarkmatter8373 Місяць тому +13

      @itookallthenames It seriously is a shame. At least they take some pythons down with them. There's a going theory that since they will often appear dead (when they've just slowed breathing/heartrate) they're still alive when swallowed sometimes. So they thrash around, and pop the python like the world's worst piñata. Several pythons were found "popped" from alligators so that's why I say theory.

  • @TBrl8
    @TBrl8 Місяць тому +475

    Back!? We never left! - snail kite spokesperson.

    • @user-lq4ct6dr5m
      @user-lq4ct6dr5m Місяць тому +9

      I still got one more in me !! --- Snail Kites at the edge of extinction

    • @windygrass9807
      @windygrass9807 Місяць тому +1

      Uhh... Snail big.

    • @holdthetruthhostage
      @holdthetruthhostage Місяць тому

      Haha 😂

    • @jacobhoffman2553
      @jacobhoffman2553 Місяць тому

      breeder did it, fish and game campaign.... we did it with wolves... bred em with huskies.... all wolves in the wild now are 10% malemute... and the general public was told nuthing.... all contracts were private.... America has changed

    • @JosePineda-jn8jk
      @JosePineda-jn8jk Місяць тому

      @@windygrass9807smol bird now swol bird. 😂

  • @arnaldorentes5371
    @arnaldorentes5371 Місяць тому +251

    Nature is not perfect, it's just good enough. And this is amazing!

    • @stalker7892
      @stalker7892 Місяць тому

      If it was just good enough it couldn't work. They say we have some DNA similar to Bananas. May be evolved from Bananas.

    • @tartoflan
      @tartoflan Місяць тому +15

      "Wathever works" - Life, everywhere

    • @mnomadvfx
      @mnomadvfx Місяць тому +4

      Of course it's not perfect because it's always changing.
      The only kind of organism that could truly be perfect is one that is adaptable to all potential conditions without any need for evolutionary genetic changes.
      This is why homo sapiens are so successful at spreading out - we are insanely adaptable.

    • @RishonNavarro
      @RishonNavarro Місяць тому

      @@mnomadvfxdoesn’t that humans are beautiful?

    • @goolgepl2112
      @goolgepl2112 28 днів тому +1

      "Hey man, I'll let whatever versions of you survive as long as they can live long enough to have kids"

  • @alkab5555
    @alkab5555 Місяць тому +205

    Okayy this is crazy. So glad to be a part of this amazing world

    • @nathancanaan102
      @nathancanaan102 Місяць тому +4

      Its crazy how they instinctively know whats food and whats not

    • @bassingbasics6621
      @bassingbasics6621 Місяць тому +4

      We need to protect it against people!

    • @timmaz24s
      @timmaz24s Місяць тому +2

      Is the this bird throning into a dinosaur

    • @d.b.2215
      @d.b.2215 Місяць тому +9

      ​@@timmaz24sbirds have never stopped being dinos. If your ancestors were a certain thing, then technically you're that thing forever.

    • @ivanrodriguez8644
      @ivanrodriguez8644 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@nathancanaan102 their senses don't work like ours, they are more than instincs, also fails and learning but we don't use to see that part on video

  • @saketkumar407
    @saketkumar407 Місяць тому +267

    Even Birds are now growing at a faster rate than my Investments 😶

  • @micahwest5347
    @micahwest5347 27 днів тому +14

    It’s amazing how a positive story is so much more enjoyable than the normal doom and gloom.

    • @saketrashmi
      @saketrashmi 15 днів тому +4

      It is doom and gloom story for the snail😂

    • @micahwest5347
      @micahwest5347 15 днів тому

      @@saketrashmi touché

  • @muskreality
    @muskreality 29 днів тому +10

    Snail: whatchu gonna do little birdie
    Kite: I'll be back (in Arnold's voice)

  • @BlackReaper0
    @BlackReaper0 Місяць тому +39

    It's awesome seeing them fly off with the snails!

    • @senorsuave
      @senorsuave 28 днів тому

      It's a little known fact that this behavior is responsible for their name

  • @jacquejac1840
    @jacquejac1840 Місяць тому +21

    A family of these came to a park nearby a couple months back. I've been thinking they were hawks with a taste for snails. They are a pretty decent size. Almost as big as an osprey, but not quite.

  • @DenMotherArkala
    @DenMotherArkala Місяць тому +54

    Incredible natural selection, in such a short period of time!! 🤯

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому

      Yes, natural selection, not "Evolution".

    • @angrydragon4574
      @angrydragon4574 Місяць тому +7

      These are the results produced by starvation. This is Darwinism 101 in action. But in this case, instead of the strongest surviving, it's the biggest.

    • @seedlessplant
      @seedlessplant Місяць тому

      @@angrydragon4574 Natural selection doesn't work by selecting the strongest, it works by selecting the species that can reproduce the best, surviving just helps them reproduce, and being strong just helps them survive, alot of animals aren't strong and have evolved other traits to help them survive like being small and agile in rats.

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому +2

      @@angrydragon4574 "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening."
      .
      Evolution does not meet the scientific method.

    • @daralcampbell2171
      @daralcampbell2171 Місяць тому +21

      @@earlysdaif you could live for thousands of years you could see it in large organisms. But we routinely see it in smaller faster reproducing ones. The emergence of superbugs resistant to antibiotics is an observable evolution

  • @kelvinlaishram6792
    @kelvinlaishram6792 Місяць тому +49

    Kites got upgraded 👏👏👏

    • @jameswatson5807
      @jameswatson5807 Місяць тому

      Their must be an intellect intelligence behind creation.

    • @jab7812
      @jab7812 25 днів тому +1

      ​@@jameswatson5807 I had a stroke reading your comment.

    • @jameswatson5807
      @jameswatson5807 25 днів тому

      @@jab7812 Google speech to text.

    • @jameswatson5807
      @jameswatson5807 25 днів тому

      @@jab7812 Are you still in hospital take is easy.

    • @jameswatson5807
      @jameswatson5807 25 днів тому

      @@jab7812 Are you in the hospital now, you've got to be careful have more fruits and veg in your diet.
      Antique vitamin d and vitamin k with the cofactors, try to limit meat consumption drink more water.
      And walk more no I'm not conspiracy theory but if you did get the jab, it could be related I did not get the jab.
      I eat very healthy so it's no issue with me.

  • @neoanderson726
    @neoanderson726 Місяць тому +65

    nature always finds a way

    • @travisjazzbo3490
      @travisjazzbo3490 Місяць тому +10

      True... However... As long as species have been evolving, species have been going extinct. It is estimated that over 99.9% of all species that ever lived are extinct. The average lifespan of a species is 1-10 million years, although this varies widely between taxa

    • @rodshop5897
      @rodshop5897 Місяць тому +8

      "nature always finds a way"
      Extinction: "Am I a joke to you?"

    • @neoanderson726
      @neoanderson726 Місяць тому

      @@rodshop5897 extinction is part of nature ... survival of the fittest?? Natural selection ?adapt or ?

    • @neoanderson726
      @neoanderson726 Місяць тому +5

      @@rodshop5897 isn't that what extinction is part of nature? natural selection? survival of teh fitest? Adapt or ?

    • @rodshop5897
      @rodshop5897 Місяць тому +7

      @@neoanderson726 Sure, extinction is part of nature, but extinction is not "finding a way" it's the end of the line.

  • @silverhowl9331
    @silverhowl9331 Місяць тому +19

    NATURAL SELECTION BABY!!!

    • @wms72
      @wms72 Місяць тому +1

      It's STILL a bird. The same species it ALWAYS was.

    • @garethmcguinness377
      @garethmcguinness377 Місяць тому +18

      ​​@@wms72 okay? Nobody's saying it switched species lmao
      It's still natural selection, just within one species rather than an entire ecosystem

    • @regularly_priced
      @regularly_priced Місяць тому +5

      @@wms72 it evolved into a bird, technically, but yes, it’s still a bird now

    • @JillRhoads
      @JillRhoads Місяць тому

      Nope..it's not from natural selection but from predator-pray selection. Evolution can have many reasons behind it.

    • @JillRhoads
      @JillRhoads Місяць тому +11

      @@garethmcguinness377It doesnt have to change species to evolve. Any change of a characterist is evolution. Evolution can come from any number of proximal pressures like natural selection, sexual selection, competition, predator-prey etc.

  • @daniellemurphy9755
    @daniellemurphy9755 Місяць тому +68

    Go SNAIL KITES!!!! WORK IT EVOLUTION!!!!

    • @georgebush6002
      @georgebush6002 Місяць тому +2

      Just to clarify, you are effectively cheering the death of the small beaked snail kites.

    • @RecoveringSkoomaAddict
      @RecoveringSkoomaAddict Місяць тому +1

      Yas kween Werk

    • @TheModdedwarfare3
      @TheModdedwarfare3 Місяць тому +11

      ​@@georgebush6002that is how nature works bud

    • @ecmswagger
      @ecmswagger Місяць тому

      Poor humans headed for idiocracy

    • @tomwellington4255
      @tomwellington4255 Місяць тому +1

      How about the jumbo snails? They didn't get the evolution memo??

  • @megansfo
    @megansfo Місяць тому +37

    Never heard of Snail Kites. Goid for them though!

  • @jackvoss5841
    @jackvoss5841 Місяць тому +5

    Mother Nature never ceases to amaze me.
    Courtesy of Half Vast Flying

  • @patrickblanchette4337
    @patrickblanchette4337 Місяць тому +13

    Life finds a way!😊

  • @chrismartinez8285
    @chrismartinez8285 26 днів тому +1

    This is fascinating 🐌 🦅 💨

  • @theck672
    @theck672 Місяць тому +9

    Wow 🤩

  • @rh426
    @rh426 Місяць тому +5

    They just need some toast and butter for that escargot, now time for me to go get mine

    • @audreymuzingo933
      @audreymuzingo933 Місяць тому +1

      If you hold one of these puppies in your hand you can see why they're nicknamed "apple snails". The biggest one I've found was almost tennis ball big. And yeah, the mind automatically goes to 'escargot' ........ but don't try to eat these, LOL. Escargot snails are terrestrial and therefore relatively clean-living. Water snails can make you dog-a$$-sick.

  • @adrianvizcaya8078
    @adrianvizcaya8078 22 дні тому

    “Nature always finds a way”

  • @TheArtfulAddict
    @TheArtfulAddict Місяць тому +5

    That's just amazing!

  • @kewan2045
    @kewan2045 Місяць тому +7

    This is very similar to dog breeding programs. You breed for certain attributes, and then that becomes the unique breeding line. Seems like the larger kites are the ones surviving passing on larger genes.

  • @philipmurphy2
    @philipmurphy2 Місяць тому +9

    Life finds there way

    • @einundsiebenziger5488
      @einundsiebenziger5488 Місяць тому +2

      Life finds its* way (singular, if it was plural it'd be "their*")

  • @mike_AD
    @mike_AD Місяць тому +1

    Wow, adaptation is incredible!

  • @meepcow6848
    @meepcow6848 Місяць тому +2

    Usually changes for evolution in the wild (at least for animals like birds) take much longer than 2 generations to create lasting changes in a species. This is honestly amazing that it happened so quickly.
    I'm interested to see what happens in the future with these birds and their habitat. Will the beaks get even bigger? Will the birds continue to get bigger or is this their optimum size? Will species that were chased out by the snails start to return? So many questions I'm excited to have answered in a couple of years!

    • @angrydragon4574
      @angrydragon4574 Місяць тому

      The reason this form of evolution occurred so quickly is simple - the biggest of the snail kites were succeeding in handling the larger snails and these larger kites were selected for their ability to handle the new reality they found themselves living in. Thw larger kites solely had to pass thwir genes for one or two generations and now that the larger kites are the predominant birds in their species their problem has been solved. Darwinism 101, adapt or die.

  • @heather_4u
    @heather_4u Місяць тому +3

    Nature is so crazy and amazing😮

  • @dobbysurfs
    @dobbysurfs Місяць тому +58

    For the people saying it's adaption and not evolution, just remember these tiny changes accumulate over million years and there you have new species

    • @DoctorSess
      @DoctorSess 27 днів тому +8

      What’s crazy to me is it happened in less than two generations.

    • @theriveroffaith852
      @theriveroffaith852 26 днів тому

      Isn't it using what they're given, to the best of their ability, and moving to where they are most comfortable?

    • @Putnamsmif
      @Putnamsmif 25 днів тому

      @@theriveroffaith852 no, they were there already. It's natural selection. These birds are, probably by a genetic mutation, better adapted to eating these snails. Over time, or two generations in this case, the birds who aren't well adapted disappear, die out, move away whatever, and the genes of the most successful, better adapted birds proliferate.

    • @keystone6162
      @keystone6162 25 днів тому

      Adaption is the bird changing to overcome it's environment and challenges, if it can.
      If it can't it dies.
      Evolution is the bird becoming a horse or a giraffe, that's impossible.
      There's a limit to how much the bird can change.
      For example if a species of donkeys invaded the wetlands, the bird won't become lions to eat the donkeys. Sometimes evolution is taught that way and it's wrong.
      And it doesn't matter if a trillion years passed, the bird would be dead by then.

    • @JustMe-mn5hk
      @JustMe-mn5hk 25 днів тому +2

      Get back with me when a bird turns into a giraffe!

  • @marinacosta8835
    @marinacosta8835 Місяць тому +36

    Life, uh... Finds a way.

    • @Krankenwagen571
      @Krankenwagen571 Місяць тому +2

      With the deaths of small beaked snail kites 🙃

    • @Dazzalingfossil6040
      @Dazzalingfossil6040 Місяць тому +6

      ​@@Krankenwagen571 It's not like the small beaked snail kites and the big beaked snail kites are separate species from each other. ( Or at least not yet. ) Not everything in life has to remain the same just because we humans grew up with the current version. Mother nature doesn't/has ever and will never care about human bias or how attach we get to a variant a an animal. ( And don't give that "Oh so we should just let every species die if they can't adapt?" talk. I never said that so don't try and put words in my mouth to win an argument. ) She also doesn't care about which variant of a particular animal survives and which don't. The main goal of life is to survive and if the snail kites have to develop bigger beaks to survive at the cost of weeding out the small beaked ones than so be it. In addition speciation mother nature can also fodder off anyone who can't survive the changes to an environment . That's just the progress of life.

  • @codyfranklin6245
    @codyfranklin6245 Місяць тому +1

    Big beak energy

  • @TheDanEdwards
    @TheDanEdwards Місяць тому +47

    "This Bird Is Evolving Right in Front of Us" - all living populations are evolving right in front of us. It just happens too slowly for a human to make much of a notice.

    • @dweebteambuilderjones7627
      @dweebteambuilderjones7627 Місяць тому +9

      Unless your generation time is short enough (see: MRSA).

    • @rwild9356
      @rwild9356 Місяць тому +4

      This is true; evolution is always at play, even when populations are stable or selection forces are weak enough that it's not very noticeable (like humans and wisdom teeth). In the case of the kites, the selection bias is very strong, so the evolution happens quick enough to see.

    • @huldu
      @huldu Місяць тому +5

      Indeed there were some elephants in Africa that were hunted due to their tusks and now many years later only elephants with small tusks remain, survival of the fittest. Nature will always adapt no matter what we do. What we're doing now is *nothing* compared to what has happened in the history of our planet. It's unfortunate that other species have to suffer because of us, that's my only problem.

    • @KateeAngel
      @KateeAngel Місяць тому +4

      Except for all the f-ing antibiotic resistance, that happens too fast 😂

    • @christophernuzzi2780
      @christophernuzzi2780 Місяць тому +2

      @@KateeAngel Because it's bacteria. E. Coli can reproduce every 20 minutes. That's three generations per hour, 72 per day, 26,280 per year. Compare that to one per year for birds and many animals and about 20 years for a human generation. That's why evolution happens so quickly for bacteria.

  • @ChadGardenSinLA
    @ChadGardenSinLA Місяць тому +14

    Evolution is truly amazing!!

    • @mikesiver1950
      @mikesiver1950 Місяць тому +3

      Evolution is a myth.

    • @lepton31415
      @lepton31415 Місяць тому +4

      this isn't evolution. it's adaptation.

    • @mickeyhadley4281
      @mickeyhadley4281 Місяць тому +5

      @mikesiver1950 so is the god of israel

    • @grahamschmidt444
      @grahamschmidt444 Місяць тому

      ​@@lepton31415 adaptation is the first step to evolution. Maybe you need to watch a few more Nature PBS videos

    • @saganworshipper6062
      @saganworshipper6062 Місяць тому

      @@lepton31415 It is evolution by natural selection.

  • @timberwolfdtproductions3890
    @timberwolfdtproductions3890 Місяць тому +1

    Nature is amazing!

  • @farhanatoerien3437
    @farhanatoerien3437 21 день тому

    This footage is amazing

  • @facitenonvictimarum174
    @facitenonvictimarum174 Місяць тому +260

    And humans are devolving right in front of the birds.

    • @Chris-nk7mq
      @Chris-nk7mq Місяць тому

      Ya lol mixing hybrid monkeys in what do u expect.

    • @muslimcel4581
      @muslimcel4581 Місяць тому +17

      Devolution doesnt exist

    • @facitenonvictimarum174
      @facitenonvictimarum174 Місяць тому +20

      @@muslimcel4581 Prove it.

    • @Darren51283
      @Darren51283 Місяць тому +21

      ... as a result of socialism.

    • @kavorka8855
      @kavorka8855 Місяць тому

      @@Darren51283exactly! Modern communist parties such as the greens, the social democrats, the postmodernists, the environmentalists, etc have already helped the devolution of the europeans.

  • @audreymuzingo933
    @audreymuzingo933 Місяць тому +21

    "Derrr, but that's not evolution! It's not like a bird turned into a dog!"

    • @charlesstevenson2642
      @charlesstevenson2642 Місяць тому +6

      Micro-evolution pretty normal.
      Vs. macro-evolution where generations diverge into new species, genuses, classes, phyla, kingdoms.

    • @audreymuzingo933
      @audreymuzingo933 Місяць тому +17

      @@charlesstevenson2642 Well it's not so much "normal" vs. "not normal." It's shorter periods of time versus many millennia, which is hard for some people to wrap their minds around.

    • @Daily-PE
      @Daily-PE Місяць тому +4

      ​@audreymuzingo933 My first thought on this was how it may be actually a problem for scientists. Like said in the video it only took a decade for this to happen, wouldn't that be way to fast for neo darwinism? I will also point at the complete opposite side of the spectrum where scientists found that gars would only a .000000001 genetic change over millions of years yet there are many gar species that look completely different but have the same genetics?

    • @tylerhawley4012
      @tylerhawley4012 Місяць тому +14

      @@Daily-PEit’s all circumstantial. Stronger selective pressure, among other things, would lead to faster expected changes. The fact that the horseshoe crab has remained nearly unchanged for something like 100 million years doesn’t hamper the fact that other species have evolved a whole lot in that time.

    • @seedlessplant
      @seedlessplant Місяць тому +5

      @@Daily-PE Alot of scientists would actuallly love it

  • @amandagreen1030
    @amandagreen1030 Місяць тому +2

    This is amazing!!! So much hope for other species!

  • @Long_DoooG
    @Long_DoooG 23 дні тому

    So fascinating to watch

  • @vienicestyles
    @vienicestyles Місяць тому +8

    Mother Nature 🌬️ is always Evolving. 🥰🥰 If humans could just leave nature alone, things would balance out automatically.

    • @viron6734
      @viron6734 24 дні тому +4

      We're a part of nature too. Eventually our population will balance out - 8 billion is unsustainable.

  • @JosePineda-jn8jk
    @JosePineda-jn8jk Місяць тому +3

    Even with evidence staring right at people, some are still going to deny evolution and say this is just adaptation 🤣

    • @JosePineda-jn8jk
      @JosePineda-jn8jk Місяць тому +3

      @AnaMendezLovesBonobos I guess you didn’t understand my point. Religious folk and evolution deniers will not tie adaptation to evolution. They instead try to separate the two and say one doesn’t prove the other.
      Although it’s obviously asinine.

    • @JosePineda-jn8jk
      @JosePineda-jn8jk Місяць тому +1

      @AnaMendezLovesBonobos oh mb then, we are on the same page lol.

    • @jepizzo2
      @jepizzo2 12 днів тому

      Once again, this is not an example of actual evolution. Evolution would be “natural selection of random point mutations.”
      It’s not like the bird had a new single letter mutation which gave it a bigger beak. This is just expressing the existing gene for size a bit longer. Beak, and other body parts size, already exist within a range. Big beaked birds already existed before the supposed evolution happened!
      It would be like someone killing everyone in an area that doesn’t have red hair and then saying, “Wow, evolution in a single day! Now everyone has red hair.”
      Natural selection is LOSING genetic information, not gaining. All the genetic info for producing other hair colors was lost.
      Evolution is a destructive process. It just randomly corrupts functional code until some of it stops working. One cannot produce anything truly new with a destructive process. All genetic diseases are mutations which have broken a necessary function and limited someone. And natural selection, which is claimed eliminates bad mutations, seems incapable of purging the damaged code. Thus, genetic diseases keep accumulating. If anything, creatures are de-volving, not getting better.
      Everything was wisely designed to have a range of features, sizes, colors, smells, etc. This provides wonderful diversity and resilience. These genes already existed though and just needed to be combined in different ways or be expressed for a longer or shorter time. These variations oscillate around a mean and will never produce anything truly new.
      www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/science/

  • @shiro8183
    @shiro8183 Місяць тому +1

    They never left. They just go for training and now they are ready

  • @TJSaw
    @TJSaw Місяць тому

    Nature never fails to amaze me.

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 Місяць тому +4

    specialists are always more vulnerable

    • @Krankenwagen571
      @Krankenwagen571 Місяць тому

      Bears , Crows , pigeons , seals do not speciate much , that's why they ruling .
      Also we humans the lone species of our genus

  • @seadog915
    @seadog915 Місяць тому +49

    I was born in Miami , Fla. in 1953 and I can tell you there were snail kites like this when I was a teenager. And the snails have come and gone 2 or 3 times in my life. If you were able to get copies of The Miami Herald from the 60s, eventually you will find articles about them and the kites. They even printed recipes(1966-67) on cooking the snails. It's a good thing Florida made it a state park, cause if not there wouldn't be any Everglades today.

    • @pikiwiki
      @pikiwiki Місяць тому

      what kind of snails are these?

    • @seanrowshandel1680
      @seanrowshandel1680 Місяць тому +1

      Originally, there was one language and half of the world was trying to decipher their LIVING language. They didn't know which letter each word begins and ends with. They tried to monitor what we were saying. The bird-related title of this video must be a reference to the Lynyrd Skynyrd song which is about the same thing.

    • @thecreature7808
      @thecreature7808 Місяць тому +4

      @@pikiwiki apple snails; original prey was a smaller native subspecies of apple snail, the larger snails came from the aquarium trade

  • @abdulazizrex
    @abdulazizrex Місяць тому +2

    Life finds a way!!

  • @dddeason
    @dddeason Місяць тому +15

    I heard that some elephants in Africa are no longer growing tusks. Magic!

    • @CampingforCool41
      @CampingforCool41 Місяць тому

      Not magic, just natural selection- or perhaps unnatural selection in the case of Elephants, since the ones with tusks were getting killed, the ones without reproduced. However most elephants still are growing tusks. Many are being removed by conservationists in order to protect them.

    • @jz4087
      @jz4087 Місяць тому

      Reference. Evidence?

    • @411bvRGiskard
      @411bvRGiskard Місяць тому

      @@jz4087It’s called Google & you need to evolve more to use it.

    • @BonQeeqeethe3rd320
      @BonQeeqeethe3rd320 Місяць тому +1

      Pretty sure those are just females

    • @dddeason
      @dddeason Місяць тому

      @@jz4087 National Geographic

  • @JoeyBlogs007
    @JoeyBlogs007 Місяць тому +33

    WOW. Amazing adaption. Bigger birds that could lift the bigger snails out of the water, survived and produced on average bigger offspring that could do similar.

    • @travisjazzbo3490
      @travisjazzbo3490 Місяць тому +12

      That is how evolution is taught and how it works.

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому +2

      Exactly, no "evolving" at all shown here.

    • @uhohhotdog
      @uhohhotdog Місяць тому +11

      @@earlysdathis is what evolution is

    • @uhohhotdog
      @uhohhotdog Місяць тому +1

      No it was the bigger beaks

    • @ronpowers745
      @ronpowers745 Місяць тому +2

      @@earlysda Correct. Adaptation is proven, but for this to be "evolution" the bird would have to be changing to another species. If you listen carefully, you will hear that "most" kites cannot eat the snails. But, that means some of the can, and these are the ones who have a competitive advantage. Nothing new has been grown, all species have natural variations. Humans, for example, come in various morphologies, making some better at sports and others at cerebral tasks, but no new limbs, nor massive brains are "evolving." They already exist as part of the genomic expression. New "parts" require new DNA first....

  • @zilch-x1054
    @zilch-x1054 Місяць тому +1

    "Life, uh, finds a way"
    ~ Dr. Ian Malcolm

  • @vgcf86
    @vgcf86 Місяць тому

    birds are amazing

  • @CaritasGothKaraoke
    @CaritasGothKaraoke Місяць тому +6

    All animals, including us, are evolving right before us.

  • @leonardowynnwidodo9704
    @leonardowynnwidodo9704 Місяць тому +5

    Can someone show this to Phoebe and Ross? Cause I want to see them argue about how evolution is something she doesn’t believe 😂

    • @matthewwelsh294
      @matthewwelsh294 Місяць тому +1

      Phoebe is someone in real life you would see yelling at the strangers on the street lol

    • @goolgepl2112
      @goolgepl2112 28 днів тому

      Growing up is realising none of the Friends were that pleasant

  • @kevinsnyder8448
    @kevinsnyder8448 23 дні тому

    Wow now that is impressive & adaptive .

  • @justayoutuber1906
    @justayoutuber1906 13 днів тому

    Nature finds a way.

  • @vincentvega5686
    @vincentvega5686 Місяць тому +3

    survival of the fittest, because these bigger kites are a perfect FIT for their changing environment.

    • @toughenupfluffy7294
      @toughenupfluffy7294 Місяць тому

      It's survival of the luckiest, because many species that could've evolved to fit their niches went extinct instead, due to haphazard environmental contingencies.

  • @stephanieyee9784
    @stephanieyee9784 Місяць тому +16

    This is a fantastic example of evolution and the survival of the fittest at work.
    The wetlands ecosystem is regaining its balance despite the foreign snail species invasion.
    Well done Mother Nature.

    • @jepizzo2
      @jepizzo2 12 днів тому

      Once again, this is not an example of actual evolution. Evolution would be “natural selection of random point mutations.”
      It’s not like the bird had a new single letter mutation which gave it a bigger beak. This is just expressing the existing gene for size a bit longer. Beak, and other body parts size, already exist within a range. Big beaked birds already existed before the supposed evolution happened!
      It would be like someone killing everyone in an area that doesn’t have red hair and then saying, “Wow, evolution in a single day! Now everyone has red hair.”
      Natural selection is LOSING genetic information, not gaining. All the genetic info for producing other hair colors was lost.
      Evolution is a destructive process. It just randomly corrupts functional code until some of it stops working. One cannot produce anything truly new with a destructive process. All genetic diseases are mutations which have broken a necessary function and limited someone. And natural selection, which is claimed eliminates bad mutations, seems incapable of purging the damaged code. Thus, genetic diseases keep accumulating. If anything, creatures are de-volving, not getting better.
      Everything was wisely designed to have a range of features, sizes, colors, smells, etc. This provides wonderful diversity and resilience. These genes already existed though and just needed to be combined in different ways or be expressed for a longer or shorter time. These variations oscillate around a mean and will never produce anything truly new. Shuffle the canine deck of genes as long as you want and you will never get a feline and vice-versa, because those genes aren’t in that deck.
      Family is the equivalent of the Genesis kind. Diverse potential was packed into each Kind which can be bred into unique species WITHIN the Kind (Family classification) but experiments have proved can never result in a new Family taxonomy.
      www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/science/

  • @keywestalert6329
    @keywestalert6329 Місяць тому +1

    Florida:
    Invasive species destroyed me.

  • @michelegagnon5618
    @michelegagnon5618 Місяць тому +1

    Amazing!

  • @penboyasgod6103
    @penboyasgod6103 Місяць тому +6

    _How we love thee, _*_Charles Darwin._*

  • @dvinson8657
    @dvinson8657 Місяць тому +7

    Beautiful evolution story!

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому +2

      Fairy-tale of Evolution.

    • @AsimovsMedia
      @AsimovsMedia Місяць тому

      @@earlysda Evolution is a scientific fact. You don't understand it.

    • @LaKeef4323
      @LaKeef4323 Місяць тому +3

      @@earlysda yup, just like that one fairy tale, can't remember its name...ah yes, the bible of course, every child loves that one for sure... -.-'

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому

      @@LaKeef4323 Zvonimir/LaKeef, it is not possible, by definition, for anyone to truly be an Atheist.

    • @regularly_priced
      @regularly_priced Місяць тому +1

      @@earlysda why are you so reluctant to understand a simple concept? It would make sense if you were still a child; when I was a kid I thought evolution couldn’t be possible because I couldn’t understand how the process worked. But as an adult I understand that it’s impossible for evolution not to be happening because ignoring that it exists goes against pretty much everything we know about how life works. I think if you refuse to “believe” it, it’s because you think about things on a surface level and don’t deeply analyze the way our world works. You must have heard “the theory of evolution is bad and wrong” from the people in your life and have never stopped to question it

  • @comfortablynumb9342
    @comfortablynumb9342 Місяць тому +1

    Nature finds a way

  • @Prettykittychimi
    @Prettykittychimi Місяць тому +1

    The strength it takes for that bird to pull himself vertically out of the water is just wild. They make my chickens look pathetic.

  • @chir0pter
    @chir0pter Місяць тому +5

    Florida's ecology is so f*cked with invasives but it's great to see some native predators fighting back!

    • @angrydragon4574
      @angrydragon4574 Місяць тому

      The tropical environment is suitable for many invasive species but as you can see in this video here it means that the species will adapt or die.

    • @chir0pter
      @chir0pter Місяць тому

      @@angrydragon4574 Except the invasive species are not the ones adapting or dieing here, the native one is.

    • @angrydragon4574
      @angrydragon4574 Місяць тому

      @@chir0pter This bird is clearly proving otherwise.

    • @chir0pter
      @chir0pter Місяць тому

      @@angrydragon4574 The bird is native! "Except the invasive species are not the ones adapting or dieing here, the native one is."

    • @angrydragon4574
      @angrydragon4574 Місяць тому

      @@chir0pter You stupid or something? The bird's population just tripled. That's not a dying event, it's an adaptation.

  • @YetiRC
    @YetiRC 29 днів тому +11

    Adapting.

  • @robertgehrig1631
    @robertgehrig1631 Місяць тому +1

    Had a mating pair in my back yard in the 90s. They didn’t seem to have any trouble with large snails.

    • @audreymuzingo933
      @audreymuzingo933 Місяць тому

      Then their descendants are most likely still living in that neighborhood.

  • @lucreciabarrios8487
    @lucreciabarrios8487 Місяць тому

    Just awesome

  • @deanfirnatine7814
    @deanfirnatine7814 Місяць тому +6

    Evolution is not always slow and steady

  • @Ry_Guy
    @Ry_Guy Місяць тому +3

    Uhh evolution doesn't stop fyi... it's always in motion in front of us with everything. Unfortunately with humans, we're just devolving 😂

  • @anon3118
    @anon3118 Місяць тому

    Oh. Its florida. Makes sense

  • @birdlover7776
    @birdlover7776 Місяць тому +1

    So cool ❤

  • @Astrapionte
    @Astrapionte Місяць тому +24

    You literally canNOT deny evolution.

    • @stephenwright4973
      @stephenwright4973 Місяць тому +10

      This is natural selection. Further information is needed to demonstrate that it's a case of Darwinian evolution.

    • @bcliving2818
      @bcliving2818 Місяць тому +3

      It’s still a snail kite. And it’s micro evolution

    • @RandoHooman
      @RandoHooman Місяць тому +7

      The main arguments aren't over microevolution. The majority of Christians agree that microevolution exists. The argument lies in macroevolution.

    • @MariaMartinez-researcher
      @MariaMartinez-researcher Місяць тому

      Greetings, y'all. Microevolution, macroevolution, Darwinian evolution... that's burying your head in the sand. We humans have a 98.8% genetic similarity with chimpanzees. There's a reason we can test medicines in lab rats, we have a 97.5% similarity. There are tons of fossils showing us how things happened in the large scale. *Evolution* is real. Trying to skip its consequences by denying the humbling part of it won't do.
      Humility is a virtue, you know? What a better lesson in humility could have God devised than Evolution? Is that so different from being created from *mud?*

    • @muslimcel4581
      @muslimcel4581 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@stephenwright4973natural selection leads to evolution?

  • @zweigackroyd7301
    @zweigackroyd7301 Місяць тому +3

    I was going to joke about people denying evolution and realized it is either bots or just a large population of knowledge illiterates who seem to be serious about it. Unsurprisingly without evidence, but strong faith-based assertions.

    • @frankmacleod2565
      @frankmacleod2565 Місяць тому +1

      Must be bots.

    • @zweigackroyd7301
      @zweigackroyd7301 Місяць тому +2

      @@frankmacleod2565 Would be nice to think so, but some of these comments are even dumber than bots.

    • @frankmacleod2565
      @frankmacleod2565 Місяць тому +1

      @@zweigackroyd7301 sadly, that is a good point

  • @StokesburyUSA
    @StokesburyUSA 21 день тому

    Evolution indeed

  • @ciscosebanes
    @ciscosebanes 29 днів тому

    Yeah!❤

  • @controlledchaos7808
    @controlledchaos7808 Місяць тому +13

    The snails have already turned the tide. I saw a kite after one today but the snail had evolved a speargun type appendage and shot the kite through the head then invited all its friends over for the feast. Evolution is amazing isnt it?!

    • @daisuke5971
      @daisuke5971 Місяць тому +3

      Few minutes ago, I saw a bird that discovered.........
      You know what, I'm going to bed

    • @megakirbo4250
      @megakirbo4250 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@daisuke5971😂

  • @oneskydog6768
    @oneskydog6768 Місяць тому +4

    Evolution, “change through time” is real.

    • @mikesiver1950
      @mikesiver1950 Місяць тому

      That’s not evolution. That’s adaptation. The kite is still a kite.

    • @oneskydog6768
      @oneskydog6768 Місяць тому

      @@mikesiver1950 I guess you can argue the finches of Galápagos Islands are adaptations also but they are classified as different species. Give the Kite a while evolution takes time.

    • @mikesiver1950
      @mikesiver1950 Місяць тому

      @@oneskydog6768 So tell us what the kite is going to become, if you can. Will it turn into a fish? Maybe a dog?
      Maybe you can tell us what the kite used to be? Was it a frog? Maybe a horse?
      The answer is none of the above, because evolution is an unproven theory. It is a myth and has been debunked beyond a shadow of a doubt. The kite was always a kite and will continue to be a kite. It was not some other animal before it was a bird, and it will not ever be anything but a bird. If you doubt what I say is true, perhaps you should do even just a little digging. The evidence is overwhelming and very easy to find.

    • @maxleshaolin
      @maxleshaolin 23 дні тому

      ​@@mikesiver1950you are confusing evolution with speciation. Adaptation is an outcome of the evolutionary process, which is what we see in this Kite population. The evolutionary mechanism at play here being natural selection.

    • @mikesiver1950
      @mikesiver1950 22 дні тому

      @@maxleshaolin On the contrary. You’re confusing adaptation with evolution. The bird is still a bird. It didn’t become a cow. It didn’t become a frog. It just got bigger. That’s adaptation, not evolution. The birds adapted to their larger prey and got larger themselves. They did not become an entirely different species, which is the premise of evolution.

  • @drinny26
    @drinny26 13 днів тому +1

    Hurry up birds.
    You got a lot of catching up to do.

  • @RecoveringSkoomaAddict
    @RecoveringSkoomaAddict Місяць тому +2

    I wanna come back in 20 years and see the snails kites are just giant beaks with wings.

  • @lostwithasmile485
    @lostwithasmile485 Місяць тому +4

    No mention of the snail's evolution to grow too big to eat. Cool stuff!

    • @ejohnson3131
      @ejohnson3131 Місяць тому +4

      They’re an invasive species

  • @markmuller7962
    @markmuller7962 Місяць тому +4

    "ThErS nO eVidEnCe fOr eVoLuTiOn"

    • @nexpro6985
      @nexpro6985 Місяць тому +1

      Apart from the mountains of evidence for evolution. Maybe it's time for your thinking to evolve.

    • @markmuller7962
      @markmuller7962 Місяць тому +1

      @@nexpro6985 You dond get the internet gergo do you? How old are you?

  • @nuebslayer911
    @nuebslayer911 29 днів тому

    That's that bug beak energy

  • @AmberU
    @AmberU Місяць тому

    Nature undefeated still!

  • @rogerroldan5895
    @rogerroldan5895 Місяць тому +6

    Isn’t it called adaptation?

    • @sunset6958
      @sunset6958 Місяць тому +1

      It is , but for some reason they keep calling it evolution. This is an educational channel too , so you'd think they'd operate on a higher standard.

    • @SirNarax
      @SirNarax Місяць тому +3

      @@sunset6958 Adaptation is literally the evolutionary process. They can be used interchangeably with the same end result. This is just arguing semantics one which term is technically more correct, when both are accurate.

    • @rwild9356
      @rwild9356 Місяць тому +1

      It is an adaptation, evolution is a series of adaptations. It's still called "evolution" even if it's not a new species yet, because evolution is the process by which diversity in wildlife is shaped.

    • @toughenupfluffy7294
      @toughenupfluffy7294 Місяць тому

      Evolution is simply changes in allele frequency over time, usually in adaptation to environmental pressures. That's it, easy-peasy.

    • @maxleshaolin
      @maxleshaolin 23 дні тому +1

      Adaptation is an outcome of the evolutionary process

  • @user-dd6ng1wn1b
    @user-dd6ng1wn1b Місяць тому +3

    I'm betting they would like to evolve some garlic and butter.

  • @marlenaforbes-reidy9876
    @marlenaforbes-reidy9876 Місяць тому

    Fascinating

  • @Chr.U.Cas2216
    @Chr.U.Cas2216 Місяць тому

    👍👌👏 Oh WOW, simply fantastic! Nothing is more powerful and fascinating than nature. Thanks a lot for making teaching explaining recording editing uploading and sharing.
    Best regards luck and especially health to all involved life forms (humans, animals and plants).

  • @lynnrolaf7422
    @lynnrolaf7422 Місяць тому +6

    Look at nature correcting our blunders!!!!

  • @i.m.askance7996
    @i.m.askance7996 Місяць тому +3

    How big will they be in 100 years?!

    • @GGoAwayy
      @GGoAwayy Місяць тому +2

      Bigger than the Earth itself, I think.

    • @i.m.askance7996
      @i.m.askance7996 Місяць тому +2

      @@GGoAwayy LOL!

    • @Vac700R
      @Vac700R Місяць тому +2

      Some animals' sizes increase over time if there's an abundance of food sources and they have time to grow older and get bigger. The sizes decrease when there are less and less food sources. That's why there are currently no megasize land animals after the extinct ones died/killed off.

  • @68Rockwell
    @68Rockwell 21 день тому

    Nice channel. I am starting out my Informational nature channel, and I am enjoying these.

  • @SPIN1963_
    @SPIN1963_ Місяць тому

    Bravo Sierra!

  • @MikeMorrison-lw4gz
    @MikeMorrison-lw4gz Місяць тому +5

    They are nor evolving, they are adapting

    • @nexpro6985
      @nexpro6985 Місяць тому +1

      Pay attention.

    • @maxleshaolin
      @maxleshaolin 23 дні тому

      Adaptation is one outcome of the evolutionary process. You are probably mistaking evolution with speciation.

  • @JillRhoads
    @JillRhoads Місяць тому +7

    Just for those of us who are studying ecology...this is NOT evolution from natural selection but evolution from predator-prey competiton

    • @ccoody1
      @ccoody1 Місяць тому +4

      As a raptor biologist, I will say that I am not sure I would be so restricted in my definitions. It's clearly as much natural selection as anything could be. The fact that it's happening quickly is no different than the classic peppered moth example. Nature is "selecting" for larger birds with bigger beaks because the environment is changing for the bird.

    • @maxleshaolin
      @maxleshaolin 23 дні тому

      Predator-prey interactions can definitely apply selection pressures on both parties. Natural selection can also occur with competition being the selective agent/pressure.

  • @guyh.4553
    @guyh.4553 Місяць тому

    Very good information! Gives hope to other species 😊😊😊

  • @LenaMellow
    @LenaMellow Місяць тому

    Now that is hopeful.

  • @Outrjs
    @Outrjs Місяць тому +7

    The bird is adapting. There's a difference

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому +2

      Exactly!
      Many people thing "change" or "adapt" equal "evolve", but they don't.

    • @TruthSurge
      @TruthSurge Місяць тому

      No, a single creature cannot adapt as in change their morphology (physical structure). A HERD of animals can. If an animal becomes physically different over time, that's evolution. It will breed and things change and change and now do that millions of times and see what happens. It'll be a HUGE change over HUGE amounts of time. Any fool would understand if you put a penny in a jar every day, after a month, you don't have much difference. After 50 years... quite a difference. After 100,000 years? you'd have over 3 million dollars.

    • @aaronmcc1020
      @aaronmcc1020 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@earlysda it literally does

    • @rwild9356
      @rwild9356 Місяць тому +2

      Evolution is (physiological) adaptations over time. "Evolution may be defined as any net directional change or any cumulative change in the characteristics of organisms or populations over many generations."

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Місяць тому

      @@aaronmcc1020 aaron, are you sure that "change" = "evolve"? Many others have been embarrassed when shown how ridiculous that stance is.

  • @MrBelmont79
    @MrBelmont79 Місяць тому +4

    What do you know? Charles Darwin was right 😀

  • @cosmicpsyops4529
    @cosmicpsyops4529 Місяць тому +1

    All species are evolving. Some more, some less. They don't just stop adapting even if undisturbed.

  • @jeffboothe2102
    @jeffboothe2102 Місяць тому +3

    Is it evolution, or simply a result of getting more protein etc., from eating the bigger snails?

    • @heliusfengari
      @heliusfengari Місяць тому +2

      You are joking right? Scientists rule out the obvious and other explanations before concluding. That's how scientific method works.

    • @jeffboothe2102
      @jeffboothe2102 Місяць тому +1

      Look at Mitchell Hooper, World's strongest man. You wouldn't even think he was the same person, compared to just a few years ago. Is his life a product of evolution, or just diet and lifestyle change?
      Scientific method, or a narrative? I don't believe anything anybody says anymore.

    • @jeffboothe2102
      @jeffboothe2102 Місяць тому

      Most "Scientists" are nothing but puppets these days.

  • @thetrollslayer3716
    @thetrollslayer3716 Місяць тому +8

    This evolution is not like Darwin's evolution which claims monkeys can write a play if given a typewriter.

    • @nexpro6985
      @nexpro6985 Місяць тому +8

      You cannot be serious? Did you get that silly statement from a creationist apologist?

    • @sunset6958
      @sunset6958 Місяць тому

      @@nexpro6985 He's not wrong though, just because you don't agree doesn't make him wrong. The correct term the title was looking for was adaptation

    • @SirNarax
      @SirNarax Місяць тому +5

      @@sunset6958 An adaptation is part of the evolutionary process they are related terms, arguing semantics when the end result is the same is not a productive discussion.

    • @sunset6958
      @sunset6958 Місяць тому

      @@SirNarax The OP's comment is referring to Darwin's particular theory of evolution which is change of kind (e.g monkey to human) which we have not seen in this video or really, anywhere. When most people hear evolution that image is the first thing that pops in their mind.
      You can attempt to argue that semantics are at play and that this conversation might not be productive which i can understand, agree to disagree, but under this thread we're specifically talking about using the more accurate word adaptation over evolution and that isn't an unreasonable request and i agree with OP.

    • @SirNarax
      @SirNarax Місяць тому +2

      @@sunset6958 To have an adaptation is to evolve and to evolve is to have adaptations. To call an adaptation evolution is an accurate one. Like getting upset when someone calls a laptop a computer.