Thanks for an interesting video. I am surprised that there is no prioritisation metric. That is, indication of which are the more, or less, important errors. It seems that the user does need to be prompted by errors that he/she is actually aware of. Obviously, the value then is in identifying the underlying root causes.
thanks. as far as I know all fault code readers, work this way. As I think I say in the video you do need to use common sense with the results and traditional practical methods of diagnosis of the problem
Thanks for an interesting video. I am surprised that there is no prioritisation metric. That is, indication of which are the more, or less, important errors. It seems that the user does need to be prompted by errors that he/she is actually aware of. Obviously, the value then is in identifying the underlying root causes.
thanks. as far as I know all fault code readers, work this way. As I think I say in the video you do need to use common sense with the results and traditional practical methods of diagnosis of the problem