Why Does Saudi Arabia Exist? | The Rise of the House of Saud
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2021
- Why is there a Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? For centuries, external powers lorded over the Arabian peninsula, but there was one place, its center, that outsiders could never control, at least not fully. There, Arab clans operated with significant autonomy, and the greatest among them was the House of Saud. After allying themselves with a new, and radical, religious sect, they would spend two centuries trying, with various degrees of success, to forge a powerful state for themselves in Arabia. All of which would culminate in the conquests of Abdulaziz bin Abdul Rahman Al Saud (better known in the West as Ibn Saud) who, after nearly 30 years of war, created Saudi Arabia in 1932.
Subscribe for more history:
ua-cam.com/users/LookBackHis...
Instagram (behind the scenes!):
/ james_king3125
More Videos:
What Causes Conflict in Israel-Palestine?: • What Causes Conflict i...
What Caused the Iranian Revolution?: • What Caused the Irania...
Why Wasn't Ethiopia Colonized?: • How Did Ethiopia Avoid...
Why is Texas American?: • Why Is Texas American?...
What Ended Muslim Spain?: • The Rise and Fall of A...
Why Does the Pope Have a Country?: • Why Does the Pope Have...
Music:
Danse Macabre - Busy Strings by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
Artist: incompetech.com/
Thanks for watching! If you want to know more about the Middle East, find out why the inhabitants of Israel/Palestine seem to be constantly at each other's throats, here: ua-cam.com/video/PCQct_P0UCY/v-deo.html
learn about the subject before publishing you look ridiculous.
Over therow the evil kingdom of alsoud family puppet of America and Jews 👹 👹👹👹
Radical? Whabbism? There is no such thing as Whabbism and mohammed bin abdulalwhab was not radical, Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula in his time returned to worshiping Graves and stones like they were before Islam until he came and enlightened us again and made us return to the right path and we never call ourselves Whabbis and Whabbisem never existed as a cult with its own beliefs separated from the rest of the Muslims, Whabbisem is the biggest lie you westerns lie on Saudi Arabia, and such insult to us will not be tolerated
Awesome! I've heard of the three Saudi states but I never managed to look further into the history of how they got to exist. Epic video, James, keep it up!!
Very important point that needs correction.
The saudi monarch in the first and second state was called both Emir and Imam and in fact Imam is more emphasized. The monarch was both political and religious head. The clergys function was to support him.
That changed in the third state. Abdulaziz was called Sultan "malik" king and Emir of various emirates and kingdoms until they were all united officially to form modern saudi arabia with abdulaziz taking the title of king.
I don't get why your channel has such a small audience. Your videos are awesome
Totally agree
Ikr?
Not enough interesting amimation, not enought click bait titles, not frequent enough updates.
اللهم اجعل هذا البلد آمناً مطمئناً سخاءً رخاءً وسائر بلاد المسلمين 🇸🇦
امين
امين
امين
امين يارب
تنتهي بانتهاء النفط قما قيل "السعوديه دوله ليس من المفترض أن يكون لها وجود"
What an amazing video!
Great video man 👍
As a Saudi I am grateful for King Abdulaziz and all the Arabian tribes fought with him to unite this desert that never saw such prosperity.
You have to understand at that time people starved to death and the survival is for the stronger in the arabian desert during the otmans empire that didn’t do much for them.
You would say it was the oil but oil wasn’t enough for unstable country. The country needed a visionary king rules by firm hands for Saudi to be what it became.
Middle east Muslims should have stated united or atleast don't allie with the British notorious to not hive a shit about Muslims in South Asia
r u sure it was the king and not the british 🤔
The Munafiq King?
Be thankful to the British
Surah Al Maida
[5:51] Believers! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your allies. They are the allies of each other. And among you he who takes them for allies, shall be regarded as one of them. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
very interesting, I had heard this story before but in nowhere near as much detail as this
Simplicity at its best..... I wonder how much you struggled to acheive that simplicity.... great work mate
He wasn’t a RADICAL !!!!??
Stop telling lies to people!
He was a good man who helped gather the other radical muslims and muslims who doesn’t know islam very well under the right creed which is against radicalism!! So stop saying that he is a radical
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Fun Fact: The Al Saud are a section of the Anizah tribe, also the Al Sabah of Kuwait, and the Al Khalifah of the Bahrain. The approximate number of members of the tribe is 25 million, and the Al Rashid are from the Shammar tribe, and the approximate number is 20 million.
@Fight authority check wiki they are in Iraq, Syria, Kuwait Bahrain.... Etc just check Anizah
@Fight authority and saudi is 38 million 90% are arab saudi throwing numbers will not change the facts
بصيله وش عندك
@@salman6217 نعم
@@Zombie_M8من بني حنيفه وليس عنزه
Good Historical video love from saudi arabia 💚💚💚🇸🇦
Glad you enjoyed!
May allah destroy al saud
what
تستهبل انت؟ تقول فيديو تاريخي جيد؟ انت ما تعرف انقليزي؟ حرفياً لي دقيقة بالفيديو على طول سمعته يقول ان محمد بن عبدالوهاب راديكالي... وهذه كذبه من أولها... محمد بن عبدالوهاب ارجع التوحيد الى بلادنا... ولم يجلب شيء جديد... ولم يكن ارهابي كما ينعته الكفار والخوارج والشيعة
بلاش غباء
@@TheAliXxD هو قال انه راديكيلي يعني اصولي ((( اصولي : هي اصطلاحٌ سياسي فكري مستحدث يشير إلى نظرة متكاملة للحياة بكافة جوانبها السياسية والاجتماعية والاقتصادية والثقافية))) و لم يقل اراهابي !
I like how your pronunciation is on point. Usually these names get mangled so badly they aren't coherent anymore :D
I always try to do my best with names!
Amazing video
impressive, a Western content maker who talks objectively about Arab history. You are the first to do it. Thank you, sir
@@The_Gambler10 These Saudis conquered all the lands from Spain in the west to the land of the Uyghurs in China in the east in less than 90 years, and they introduced all these peoples to Islam, at the time when you were living in caves like m**keys, before you invaded the Roman Empire and evolved into humans. Do you think you have a history greater than them lol, go play somewhere else and don’t bother people!
@@alal039 تحيه لك من سعودي 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦
@@user-nm3it7ce2m
على راسنا من فوق يابن حميد :)
@Fight authority
300 years of history and we see a stupid man say It’s really not much to say
Extremely underrated
make more videos about midle east histrioy becoase its really entartaning
Great job once again
Hey man excellent video. To concisely cover what must have been a complicated series of political family dramas is nothing to sneeze at.
💎 ABSOLUTELY FASCINATING 💎
🙏💜🙏
🕊🌟🕊
Great video, but there’s some points that needs to be correct
1- Mohammad bin Abdullawhab movement wasn’t radical, it came out of necessity when the Ottoman empire neglected the Arab people and they were left uneducated until they lost the teaching of islam at that time and people started worshiping other gods, but the radical movement came in the 70s and 80s and it’s what we call “Al-Sahwa” and they used Mohammad bin Abdullawhab book and name to justify their views that’s why people think they are connected when in fact the 2 movements has nothing to do with each other, that’s why when you see pictures and videos of Saudi up until the early 70s you will see a modern country and not as religious as it has became in the 80s but we finally got ride of “Al-sahwa” here in Saudi.
2- Al-khwan is a radical movement that started in Egypt not Saudi, and it was never part of the political scene in Saudi until the 80s when they supported Al-sahwa and it has always been against the royal family not with it.
3- the last point is the part that western historians like to leave out when they try to explain the dynamic here in Saudi. Our community here is a tribal one and when King Abdulaziz was trying to unite the country he made deals with most of the tribes leaders and was supported by most of them because he was one of them, and people have had enough of being ruled and terrorized by a foreign power which was the Ottoman Empire at the time, that’s why they rallied around him and went to war with him against the Ottomans and he promised a future without the ottomans control, and up until now the royal family here is still supported by all the tribes. So King Abdulaziz ruled be uniting the people under the tribal flag not necessarily the religious one.
If wahabism isn’t radical I don’t know what is 😂
Maybe he was the great Buddha and nobody knew it
@@BHTQ18 what is this 'wahabism' that everyone talks about?
@@Afif.anNayem.asSalafi extreme salafism it is a backward movement that restricts freedom pf thinking, innovation and reformation. Women are inferior and nonmuslims are impure and shouldn’t be treated equal. Sharia is enforced. Ot is based on the most radical terrorist sheik ibn taymeya
@@BHTQ18 you must belong to some grave worshipping heretic sufi clan to call shaykhul Islam Ibn Taimiyah an extremist, only the extreme sufi heretics hate him, ibn Taimiyah is a beacon of knowledge for this ummah, rahimahumullah
@@Afif.anNayem.asSalafi no not Sufi or shia just using my brain and having a little bit of humanity! shaykhul al takfeeryeen and terrorists even ISIS actually based its ideology on ibn tayemeyeh la3anah allah. Wahabism is not far from what ibn taymeyeh preached
Real Talk
God bless the Najdi Arabs 🇱🇾🤝🇸🇦
It Imam Terkhi not Turki.
God bless the Libyan Amazigh and may Allah save them from arab stupidity
There are so many errors in this especially about Muhammad ibn Abdil Wahhab and the so called „Wahhabism“
Calling People Wahhabi is dumb because al Wahhab is one of the 99 names of Allah
Thanks wahabi 😂
@@BHTQ18 lol kid
5:14
Why you didn’t include Lebanon and Western Syria in this Arab state. The king Faisal wanted these lands and are historical for Arabia
ههههههههه
😂🤦🏽♂️
If speak Arabic doesn’t make you Arabian
It’s our heritage culture and ethnicity
🇸🇦
@@user-dp3kw1cp3r i don't know if the saud family is much Arabian than the Jordanians .
Even there's a debate whether the aala-saud are arabs or not .
@@zuheyrcade6239 al saud are tribes of Arabian tribes
They are Arabians as other tribes in KSA
الحمد لله على نعمة آل سعود🇸🇦
Being a secular Muslim, I think about the history of Middle East as a fascinating piece.
Why would we be going away anytime soon ? This land is arab and will remain “pure” Arab, beduin, tribal land forever.
im Saudi
God bless kingdom of Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦
People who do party
No
Yep, Munafiq King is Blessed according to the Qur'an ☺️
Surah Al Maida
[5:51] Believers! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your allies. They are the allies of each other. And among you he who takes them for allies, shall be regarded as one of them. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
Ameen.
Cuz by its own people we the HijaziNajdi 🇸🇦❤
I like this because it was swift and to the point, but what happened to the Al-Rashid family after the saudis took over?
@@LookBackHistory incorrect
even at war they wrote poems praising each other .. later there is intermarriage between the two houses
Al-Rashid still doing fine and well in Saudi Arabia
Al rashid is a big tribe here and they are fine and some of them treat like nobles
Alive
they are fine, my friend is one of them, some of them are call Emirs too
Easy to answer, now the Al-Rashid become the nobles in saudi arabia
Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab was not radical. Hardly a ‘neutral’ take on history here. LOL.
Perhaps he’s ‘radical’ to the people of whims and desires and are ignorant of their religion.
Stop taking sources of history outside of Europe from European and western sources.
And maybe study the religion a bit more before definitely defining someone as radical or not.
Saudi Arabia has become a great country
keep the good work sub and like
قول ماشاءالله
اي والله صادق
No such thing as "Wahhabis".
Wahabi is a sect
@@nuratanya3813 since Islam came from us
U can called it the real sec
But yeah no wahhabis
Wahhabism actually exists, but it means protecting Islam and Sunnis against the ottomans
Don’t be a fool, wahabbi did indeed exist and ruin Islam
@@Az-pe8jj Liar... People in Saudi has been following the true Islam since the prophet PBUH... The only one ruining Islam are Khawarij or Rawafidh...
3:55 Man that sounds a lot like the Fremen from Dune. Frank Herbert is known to have been very heavily influenced by Arabic history in writing the story, but this is pretty eerily close.
A displaced prince gets back his land thanks to taking control of large extremely proficient fighters accustomer to harsh life of the desert through cultivating their extreme religious fanaticism towards him.
Also the fact that the ruler eventually loses control of the fanatical followers is also comparable to Paul's fate.
And that's why religious fanatics should never be in charge of anything.
@@occam7382 For Frank Herbert, he wasn't specifically against religious fanaticism. He was against fanatacism, period. He said his favorite President was Nixon and his least favorite was Reagan. His explanation was that Nixon reminded everyone to not trust people in power and Reagan did the opposite by cultivating a very loyal following among Americans.
His stories are all about not giving up too much power to authorities, never idolize any one person/group to be your saviour.
@@chinguunerdenebadrakh7022, Interesting stuff. Thanks for sharing.
I am Arabic in Saudi ❤❤🎉
Based question
3:54 headed by Paul Atreides 🤣
Because it's good country
@La Rambla Flash why do u say that? do u have an argument for these claims?
the thing is that im muslim i come from Saudi Arabia and I’m living in Saudi Arabia and yet don’t know all of this information 😅
Its a shame
Nah man the Saudi's just said a dua (prayer) to god
I ask God, the Most High, the Great, to perpetuate the House of Saud and the banner of monotheism always and forever.
Ameen
I ask nature to help heal the middle east by getting rid of that feudal bone sawing trash called al-saud and other feudal puppets.
The house of saud does not care for the Ummah and are supporting a lot of haram ! They also do not protect any Arab countries including Palestine , Syria and many others not to mention they are strong allies with both the US and Israel
But According to the Qur'an, He's a Munafiq.
Surah Al Maida
[5:51] Believers! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your allies. They are the allies of each other. And among you he who takes them for allies, shall be regarded as one of them. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
So much misinformation
We're not wahabis it's a made up word to insult us
MIAW was not an extremist
sorry if our country leaders names are really hard, dont be confused.
لايوجد شيء اسمه وهابية .. محمد بن عبدالوهاب تتم مهاجمته بسبب انه قال العبادة لله وحده لاشريك له وهدم القبور التي كان يذهب لها الناس لطلب الشفاعة من غير الله .
العثمانيين استغلوا اسمه لأن فيه واحد نفس اسمه كافر
why are you using words like ''radicals'' or ''zealuts''?
Bro what about Yemen 🇾🇪
yay im from saudi arabia
كلنا سلماااان كلنا محمد!
As a Muslim, i heavily agree to that..
Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab rahimahu Allah is not a "Radical" he is but a hanbali shaikh who reestablished "Tawhid" which is the onness of Allah. And just to clarify for those kids who are gonna reply, I am not a saudi.
BarakAllah feek for correcting him
Wahab is Radical and betrayed Khilafat and established kingdom which is haram.
Wahab ideas ruling now but no place for Muslims in their rule but in islam khilafat is the rule and citizenship is tauheed
@@Syedasakina13 The ottomans did not rule Najd, it was ruled by arab tribes for centuries, Ibn wahhab rahimahu Allah did not do khuruj, since he did not do bay3a or was born into any khilafah.
He fought people who spread shirk and at that time, those were the ottomans.
Also the ottomans were not a khilafah anyways.
@@hamza.r4319 wahabi is a mushrik , who things Allah in sky's but not everywhere
Actually middle East want only turkey Saudi Iran balance have merge with these countries
There are many reasons why suadi arabia exist
Pet The Saudi
Care For The Saudi
And Help The Saudi
Can someone explain the familial relations between the Saudi and Qatari royal family. I heard they're cousins 🤔
Almost all people in the peninsula are related because they are Arab tribes who share lineage. As for Al-Thani and Al-Saud, they share the same area in Najd before Al-Thani immigrated to Qatar.
Qatar royal family are descendant of Mohammed bin Abdulwahab
Saudi arabia gang
👇
you forgot to mention saudi yemni war in 1930s
It's crazy to think, if the British got involved to help Najd than Najd may have united Arabia. The new government would have been much more pro western (First from Arab revolt and now British help to unite Arabia) when oil was discovered this new Saudi Arabia could have become a very strong western ally.
Though it should be noted that Saudi Arabia today is an ally of the west if, perhaps, an unsavoury one at times.
F the west
لمعلوماتك داعش صناعة غربية صنعتها بريطانيا القاعدة مدعومة من الولايات المتحدة و كذلك ايران مدعومة من الغرب ، ثم يقولون عن الشرق إرهاب ( رماني بدائه و هرب )
@@Sky-najdWtf, "eVeRyThInG is CaUsed bY the WesT"
Dude you make no sense
@@akkiaddizone6889 haven't you heard of the scandal? Apparently france funded th em recently
You have got a lot of miss information. I don’t know where do you get your facts from but a lot of it is wrong . States resources because I disagree with more than half of what you say.
Nah man ur asking that while it's my country why tf are u being mean to it 💀
The amount of false informations in this video .
6:10
You didn’t mention that he made a deal with the ottomans he surrender him self at one condition aldareyah safety , the ottomans agreed .. they took him to istanbul and beheaded him . And then the ottmans broke the agreement they massacred and killed thousands of people and ruined every building .
western people should pronounce our names right like we do to their names
Ummmmm not exactly you can’t pronounce African names correctly or Asian names, just because you can pronounce some names correctly doesn’t mean everyone should. Not every one can pronounce Arabic names correctly and that’s fine. It’s not offensive.
@@amjadmohammed485 nah bro we pronounce every single name right Im a fu**ing north african and I speak multiple languages I think you guys are doing it in purpose
@@viragechamali22 I am Arab and everyone around me is my name is Arabic named after the yemenis empire yet not a single arab pronounce it correct mostly it westren who do it correctly, even though I miss up the name multiple time. for instance do you know how to prounce chinas name the answer 90% of the time is no so shouldn't you work harder to improve yourself
@@saba6993 I could pronounce chinese names correctly actually Im an international student in China Im in liaoning, dalian and I never had hard time pronouncing Chinese names also Chinese people pronounce my name good except the Z they replace it with J.
and they are not doing it on purpose like those
@@viragechamali22 will good for you people miss prounouce my name all the time like once my name was Katy another time Sophie and this are fellow Arab speaker and my name is Arabic
I live in Saudi Arabia
yeah yeah no one needed to know that honestly
The Emirate of Jabal Shammar🇲🇻 is the greatest, my friend! Look at what the orientalist John Frederick Williams said about the Shammar tribe, which subjugated most of the tribes of the island and which (never allied with the West and did not submit to it despite the continuous offers of Great Britain, France, Russia, and Germany), John said; “When the Astana government consolidated its control over the island, the rebellious Shammar clan presented a strong and continuous challenge to the Ottoman authority. It took a struggle that lasted almost 100 years, on the part of the Ottoman government and also on the part of the British and Iraqi governments after the First Great War, to subjugate the Shammar permanently.” Yes. The Shammar state was in control without oil, and King Abdulaziz took advantage of Britain in order to restore the rule of his ancestors, so he established the Saudi state with the help of Britain..
ITS BECAUSE OF MAKKAH AND MADINAH
POWER OF ALLAH
MUSLIM GANG
👇🏻
Smth Worth to mention: the first 2 emirates did not succeed bc Al Saud didn’t allied themselves with the most powerful tribes at that time (Harb) (Mutair) (Otaiba) those tribes ruled 35% of Arabia, and they block the ottomans from moving to Najad and deep west hijaz (Otaiba & Harb) and when ibn saud allied himself with these tribes they were able to crush the ottomans and jabal Shamar (state puppet)
its a kingdom not a "states"
HEY IM IN SAUDI
1932 not 1902
All great but the maps, in the northern side of Saudi, Jordan and Syria were ruled by my tribe the ruwalah tribe, ibn rashid had some parts of Iraq and his capital was ha’il, we eventually gave out our lands willingly to king abdulaziz because first we believed in his cause and Second we both belong to the same tribe.
Thanks for pointing this out. In fact Malik Abdul Aziz unified most of the peninsula without military conquests, something the western commentators often fail to appreciate. He was an extraordinary leader. ♥️ from 🇧🇩
Radical? Whabbism? There is no such thing as Whabbism and mohammed bin abdulalwhab was not radical, Muslims in the Arabian Peninsula in his time returned to worshiping Graves and stones like they were before Islam until he came and enlightened us again and made us return to the right path and we never call ourselves Whabbis and Whabbisem never existed as a cult with its own beliefs separated from the rest of the Muslims, Whabbisem is the biggest lie you westerns lie on Saudi Arabia, and such insult to us will not be tolerated
Wahhabis are barbaric cavemen who destroy graveyards and mosques.
There is no caliphate universally recognised after 1924
Actually whole land of Rashidun Empire is ours !!!!!°°
The whole fuckin world is ours
@@cards_player w
@@BaderAlotaibi-ol9dw ما فهمت و لكن شكرا
@@cards_player w معناها win
@@cards_player it’s only yours because America allows it.
Mohammed bin Abdulwahab wasn’t radical he was a normal one
Idk
the fall of Hedjaz to Nejd is one of the greatest tragedies of modern history
Saying that from bisexule american 💀
@@nothing-rv9js im not American
@@nothing-rv9js saying that from a goatfker
@@LakeGameCreepr still not saudi
The ikhwan were Hejazi tribes not a single najdi , and all of Hejaz tribes supported and fought for abdulazez, you are not Saudi
Your maps are wrong.. kuwait was not part of Saudi Arabia nor Ottomans 🤦🏻
Why are you talking about my country why do you guys say why does it exist what did we do?!
Inshallah, if you look at what happened to Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians and Kurds, as well as the Arabs, you will understand why we valued independence. We have revolted against the corrupt Turkish rulers in Istanbul, we failed at first, but we never gave up and finally we regained our homeland after 400 years. May Allah guide our heroes to heaven and grant them janaat for overthrowing the evil Turks.
I still think that The Sauds should Jive Hejaz back to the Hashemites despite them being the legitimist rulers of the land and Direct Descendants of the Prophet Muhammad
Anyone know what happened to the family of the former ruler of the Hejaz?
One become ruler of Iraq till the monarchy abolished, the other become ruler of Jordan and his son’s and grandsons still ruling till today, and their father who was first king of Hijaz has defeated by king Abdulaziz and flee to jordan
@@FarisXOXO oh wow that's ironic given how liberal the Jordanian king is..... Thanks for this....
@@anneeq008 he’s liberal because his mom is a white British woman and he was raised in British boarding schools.
@@FarisXOXO are the decedent's of the former Iraqi royal family still alive then? If so where are they?
@@anneeq008 Unfortunately, the Iraqi revolutionaries massacred them
Truth always prevail, the saudi family is squarely responsible for all the calamities and humiliations that have fallen on the muslim ummah. The British brought the Plan to Shariff hussain Al Saud who plotted the destruction of the CALIPHATE rule in return to be made king . He was also paid 7 million pounds. We will continue to publish the truth. Their silence, inaction on the issue of Palestine and their past historical involvement against Iraq is more than enough to tell the world who are the Saudi family.
Thanks for making me learn about my country's history Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦
So i take it that just like me you didn’t pay much attention in history class 😅
@@tigerblade4 wait a minute that's a good point...
Yep, Did you also read the Qur'an?
and How Allah sees him?
Surah Al Maida
[5:51] Believers! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your allies. They are the allies of each other. And among you he who takes them for allies, shall be regarded as one of them. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
Nothing call wahabi.!
Obviously its from heaven, if humans can't find the answer, the answer are in the Quran, same way life after death we dont know but the Creator tell us in The Quran
The eyes of Ottoman Turkey almost completely blocked the star and crescent. °Λ°
Saudi Arabia is best for peace life with no more blah blah like what else others doing!
Lol
The title made me think it was bad but I didn’t think to see
Dont be snowflake
why do you even exist in this universe of meeca
من فضلك توقف عن الحديث عن دول لا تعرف تاريخها 😮😮😮 انت فقط تسيء للدول العربية دون معرفتك بالتاريخ
يبدوا ان من يزودك بالمعلومات يعاني من كره لنا
@@EmpressGaruda
من ؟!
I think this is the best narration I have heard of the history of Saudi Arabia. Concise but covering almost all the key points. Well Done. I hope you can do you can do one to explain how the roots of terrorism were formed in this region, the role of both Ultra Wahabism and Muslim brotherhood. And how current reforms in Saudi Arabia are going to change that at very roots. Cheers
I don’t know Biba but the root of terrorism arrived in a boat with the first Crusader
@@jayjayjay835 It is complex for sure. There are waves in all religions and the age of crusades were certainly an intense wave. However, the one our generation experienced started when some idiots decided inciting Muslims to some sort of undefined 'Jihad' was a cheap way to fight back the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Also, the role of the Muslim brotherhood is often hidden from the world as they work in stealth mode.
@@habibaallarakia6253 it is complex indeed however Biba despite the fact that American did antagonised the Afghan/Russian war for their own gain Afghan had every right to defend their country not because ppl like you call act of JIHAD terrorism it it means defending your land bad thing it’s God-given right to fight invaders whether they are Russian American or bunch of Polish Jew
@@jayjayjay835 Jihad, to Muslims, is a deep concept of 3 levels starting with self and aiming to actualize our God-given mission on Earth to make it prosper. However, it can be exploited by others. Just clarifying before leaving what is not a conversation apparently.
اتعني ذاك الإرهاب الذي انها نسل 115 مليون هندي وسرق وطنهم ؟
انا الذي القى قنبلة ذرية على هيروشيما وناجازاكي على دولة استسلمت؟
ام الذي قام بإستعباد نصف العالم وفرض الليبرالية بالقوة على دول العالم ؟
ام الذي قام بالحرب العالمية الاولى والثانية ؟
او حرب افغانستان وتجويع نصف مليون طفل عراقي حتى الموت ؟
انا سعيد بالأزمات التي تمر بها أمريكا والاوروبيين واتمنى اهم الأسوأ وسعيد جداً لإغاضتكم يامنافقين.
Based House of Saud
If you are looking for truth & facts never listen to somthing in English 🇸🇦
It’s funny to see how you declare somebody radical when you know nothing about religion Islam. tell me why was he radical or are you just blind following somebody speech?
I see a lot of comments trying to defend Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab by claiming he was radical. That is untrue for his time and place his interpretation of Tawid was radical. He committed mukaffir and is by definition a takfiri. That is a radical position.The Arabian Peninsula is not the same place it was 230 years ago.
Study with Saudi scholars, don't study with the Ikhwanul Muslimin and ISIS. Then you will know that the accusations against Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab are not true.