Timestamps: 00:00 - Channe11 Intro 00:06 - Posing The Question 00:17 - Introducing: Ronald Knox 00:28 - Knox's Limerick(s), Illustrated 00:45 - The Implication of Knox's Verses 01:05 - Props to Alan Watts 01:11 - The Need to Go Beyond Science for Answers 01:44 - Spirituality/God as a Transcendent Tool 02:06 - Confessing the Process, and Considering a Philosophical View of God 02:35 - Knox Rejects the Premise of the Question 03:15 - The Inextricable Link Between Being and Awareness 03:42 - ( The "Oh Face" and the Three Os Prelude ) 03:52 - The Necessity of a Spiritual Perspective 04:30 - The Self-Limiting Nature of Strict Materialism 05:26 - The Three Os, Their Characteristics, and the One Most Applicable 06:25 - A universal placeholder is required. The "Name" is secondary - just ask the Rock. 07:19 - Chopping down misconceptions of God / "Axed" KRS-One. 07:27 - Perception-Model Slides (Reality Requires Consciousness) 08:28 - Minecraft/Mindcraft, Quantum Nuggets and the MC-YOU 08:35 - Solipsism or Sloppyism? 09:04 - Rappin' Up - The Real Good News 09:32 - It's Just Vibes, Man 10:53 - Air-Quotes Hearing 11:16 - The Reality-Now Minigame (You Buddha Believe It) 11:48 - God as Omnipresent Consciousness / The Razor's Edge(s) 12:19 - The Green Field Forever Listens 12:33 - The Greatest Gift of All 12:52 - Knox Outro, and Thanks
This is a link to a very good video on Schopenhauer: ua-cam.com/video/f-djIdl8WO4/v-deo.html. I saw it after completing this piece, but was impressed with it's breadth and depth. It's worth a view.
That's fair - and that was my take for a long time. I think it depends on how sound is considered @10:54 and whether anything happens, or even exists in a consciousness void, which is impossible to test. Can objects exist without a subject? It's fascinating, and the answer changes depending on how we look at it, our presuppositions, and how we define our terms - which is why I still retain some respect for the opposing argument from a certain perspective. I appreciate the feedback.
@@channe11-manager it makes a vibration. Ear drums convert vibration to sound. So technically, even if someone is around to hear it... It still has only made a vibration. Watching your video made me lose some brain cells. Please stop using religion to make yourself and others dumb. We need smarter people on earth, not dumber 1s.
Timestamps:
00:00 - Channe11 Intro
00:06 - Posing The Question
00:17 - Introducing: Ronald Knox
00:28 - Knox's Limerick(s), Illustrated
00:45 - The Implication of Knox's Verses
01:05 - Props to Alan Watts
01:11 - The Need to Go Beyond Science for Answers
01:44 - Spirituality/God as a Transcendent Tool
02:06 - Confessing the Process, and Considering a Philosophical View of God
02:35 - Knox Rejects the Premise of the Question
03:15 - The Inextricable Link Between Being and Awareness
03:42 - ( The "Oh Face" and the Three Os Prelude )
03:52 - The Necessity of a Spiritual Perspective
04:30 - The Self-Limiting Nature of Strict Materialism
05:26 - The Three Os, Their Characteristics, and the One Most Applicable
06:25 - A universal placeholder is required. The "Name" is secondary - just ask the Rock.
07:19 - Chopping down misconceptions of God / "Axed" KRS-One.
07:27 - Perception-Model Slides (Reality Requires Consciousness)
08:28 - Minecraft/Mindcraft, Quantum Nuggets and the MC-YOU
08:35 - Solipsism or Sloppyism?
09:04 - Rappin' Up - The Real Good News
09:32 - It's Just Vibes, Man
10:53 - Air-Quotes Hearing
11:16 - The Reality-Now Minigame (You Buddha Believe It)
11:48 - God as Omnipresent Consciousness / The Razor's Edge(s)
12:19 - The Green Field Forever Listens
12:33 - The Greatest Gift of All
12:52 - Knox Outro, and Thanks
I really enjoyed your video. You did a great job of putting into words what is beyond words or minds ability to comprehend . 🙌
Thank you, sir. That's greatly appreciated.
Typo @2:30 - Schopenhauer's name is misspelled.
This is a link to a very good video on Schopenhauer: ua-cam.com/video/f-djIdl8WO4/v-deo.html.
I saw it after completing this piece, but was impressed with it's breadth and depth. It's worth a view.
It doesn't
That's fair - and that was my take for a long time. I think it depends on how sound is considered @10:54 and whether anything happens, or even exists in a consciousness void, which is impossible to test. Can objects exist without a subject? It's fascinating, and the answer changes depending on how we look at it, our presuppositions, and how we define our terms - which is why I still retain some respect for the opposing argument from a certain perspective. I appreciate the feedback.
@@channe11-manager it makes a vibration.
Ear drums convert vibration to sound.
So technically, even if someone is around to hear it... It still has only made a vibration.
Watching your video made me lose some brain cells.
Please stop using religion to make yourself and others dumb.
We need smarter people on earth, not dumber 1s.