@@aidenfisher5679 I know the scientific version. We used scientific method (what scientists are using) to investigate how the techniques ought to be done. We have a Udemy course about it. The wrong one is called artificial expression; the correct one is called natural expression.
@@smartresearchwingchun494 so what exactly is ur scientific method. I don't get it. How do u do a tan sao differently than any other wc method. Let's say against a straight to d face. Or even a simple pak sao. What exactly makes ur method of tan & pak sao scientific? Different? And am I to assume better??
@@aidenfisher5679 scientific Tan Sao is natural. The alignment and muscle tension are right. It's actually a solid triangular block, not a soft block. Scientific Method is process which scientists use for testing hypotheses. You can find videos about it on UA-cam. We used this kind of process to test and check whether a particular technique is taught and done correctly. This was how we managed to conclude that most Wing Chun schools are teaching and doing the techniques wrongly. The reason why they don't realise they're doing Wing Chun wrongly is that they aren't using scientific approach to examine their techniques.
@@aidenfisher5679 yes. Our Wing Chun is indeed better and more accurate than most Wing Chun schools. Because we used scientific method to examine the techniques so as to express the techniques scientifically. (How ancient martial artists might have done Wing Chun initially)
Thank you 🙏
Xiéxie 🙏🏼🇨🇭☯️
amazing, do you know roughly what year this was filmed?
1999 in Adelaide
His techniques are done and expressed wrongly.
And u conclude this bcuz??
@@aidenfisher5679 I know the scientific version. We used scientific method (what scientists are using) to investigate how the techniques ought to be done. We have a Udemy course about it. The wrong one is called artificial expression; the correct one is called natural expression.
@@smartresearchwingchun494 so what exactly is ur scientific method. I don't get it.
How do u do a tan sao differently than any other wc method. Let's say against a straight to d face. Or even a simple pak sao. What exactly makes ur method of tan & pak sao scientific? Different? And am I to assume better??
@@aidenfisher5679 scientific Tan Sao is natural. The alignment and muscle tension are right. It's actually a solid triangular block, not a soft block. Scientific Method is process which scientists use for testing hypotheses. You can find videos about it on UA-cam. We used this kind of process to test and check whether a particular technique is taught and done correctly. This was how we managed to conclude that most Wing Chun schools are teaching and doing the techniques wrongly. The reason why they don't realise they're doing Wing Chun wrongly is that they aren't using scientific approach to examine their techniques.
@@aidenfisher5679 yes. Our Wing Chun is indeed better and more accurate than most Wing Chun schools. Because we used scientific method to examine the techniques so as to express the techniques scientifically. (How ancient martial artists might have done Wing Chun initially)