Sir I have a doubt ..The guy must live somewhere around our vicinity because he goes to work on foot daily.(2)The guy must be living somewhere around our place because he walks to work daily.Are both sentences correct? Please enlighten me on this,thanks lot
The structure and use is fine.I would personally use the first form of the verb (live) because "be living" seems to imply that they are only living there temporarily. I would structure it like this: They must live (somewhere) near work (...). "Our place" to me implies my home.
Wonderful explanation! 'I don't think he meant to be rude.' 'He ……… said sorry.' i. must have ii. might have iii. would have Which is the correct option?
If I'm understanding correctly, I'm not sure any of the options would be correct. If you know for sure he said sorry, then you are not speculating, which is when you would use must, might, etc. "He said sorry" or "He said he was sorry" is enough.
Can we use conditional sentences in the same way as those modals? To speculate about the past? For example: If she passed her exams that day, she must have a lot of money now. (past - present) If they met each other, they probably got married. (past - past) If he was with her that night we went away, I will definitely kill him when I see him again. (past - future) If she chose this way, we won't meet her when we get there. (past - future) If she chose the other way, she may/could have met wolves. (past - past) If he stole the money, he will/may leave the country soon. (past - future) I can't use the third conditional in any of these, because I want to convey *a different meaning.* A: The three of us were working the crops when that ship showed up. We just saw it and ran. I don't know what happened to the rest of the crew. B: They were by the garage. Over near the spaceport. Right where that ship came down. No way they survived. C: You don't know that! We survived. If they *made / had made* it to the garage, they could've had a fighting chance! (I don't think the third conditional fits to this context)
Yes, you can, though as you pointed out all of the examples you wtote are factual conditionals. Might and could can (and often ARE) used with the third conditional as well to expresss possibility (might) and ability (could): If you had studied more for the test, you might/could have passed it. Must and can't, on the other hand, are not used with the thurd conditional.
@@shortenglishlessonswithale268 Thank you for your reply. I appreciate it! As far as I understand, the third conditional means that something is not real, we know whether something happened or not. When we say "if they *had made..."* we know that they didn't make it. But when we say "if they *made..."* it is either the second conditional or the real past conditional (depending on context). I used to doubt those sentences were correct because they don't fit to any of 0, 1, 2, 3, mixed conditionals. 0 = Real Present 1 = Real Present/Future 2 = Unreal Present/Future 3 = Unreal Past Mixed = Unreal Present/Future Unreal Present = 2, mixed Unreal Future = 2, mixed Unreal Past = 3 Real Present = 0, 1 Real Future = 1 Real Past = *?????* What conditional are such sentences? Is there a name for those?
@@Leo007619 Past real is the correct term but you're right that they are separate from the conditionals you typically see in grammar books (0-3). Somewhat strangely, in my personal experience, many grammar books omit any mention of this type of conditional altogether (with some exceptions).
Wonderful video! Could you please help me to choose the correct option? 'I don't think he meant to be rude.' 'He ……… said sorry.' i. must have ii. might have iii. would have
Sir could we use could have in place of might/may have for making past or future possible deductions for eg; in a past deduction sentence “he might/may have been sleeping at that time that’s why he didn’t pick up the phone” to “he could have been sleeping at that time that’s why he didn’t pick up the phone” and “he may/might have said so” to “he could have said so”. And in future deduction as “he will/may/might have reached there by tomorrow” to “he could have reached there by tomorrow”. Please help sir. I’d hugely thankful to you.
Short Language Lessons with Alex Rodrigo thank you so much sir. So that now I’ve concluded that for making past deductions may have/ might have / could have are nothing but synonym to each other in the affirmative form. But sir one doubt I have is, for eg in the following sentences- 1.) “hey I can’t find my phone. Oh wait..! I could’ve left it in the home”. And 2.)”I could’ve done better in the exam If I had studied the last unit.” Sir here in the above sentences as you can see could’ve is used. But former is just an assumption of the past whereas latter one is a conditional sentence and therefore they have totally different meanings. Am I right sir? Sir how to differentiate between them as it becomes quite confusing sometimes. Please help me here sir..!
You're right that most modals can have more than one meaning depending on how we use them. Must, for example, can express probability (like in this case) or obligation. As for could, when used to talk about the past it can generally express either possibility or ability (the past form of can). My recommendation would be to use the context to figure it out. So, for example, if I say that when I was 4 years old I couldn't ride a bike, it is clear that I'm expressing ability. I didn't have the ability to ride a bicycle at that age. However, I would also say that you shouldn't stress too much about what it's expressing as long as you understand the general message being communicated in the sentence. As you practice and expose yourself more to the language it will come naturally to you without having to think about it too much.
in modals of deduction in the present the opposite of must is can't and in othee video I watched that "couldn't have" for deduction in the past. are can't and couldn't the same for deduction in the past?
Sir thank you so much for your kind and speedy reply.I couldn't ask for a better teacher.Much obliged.
Perfect explanaition 👌🏻✨️
Your explanation was so clear. Tks.
I'm glad it was helpful :)
Dear Sir, I would like to appreciate your hard work that helped me a lot. Thank you so much. Stay blessed
Excellent tutorial ,keep it up
Thank you very much, the explanation is very good and clear, i think That i'm going to pass my exam 😂
your explanation is very clear, I could understand every word, I'm grateful
Thank YOU! ☺
Thank you so much.I understand lots of useful information.I'm learning English ,so you helped me.(sorry if I have mistakes here)
Your message is fine! Thank you for your comment and good luck!!
@@shortenglishlessonswithale268 thank you so much
It helped me a lot! Thanks
I'm so glad to hear that! Thank you for your feedback :)
Sir I have a doubt ..The guy must live somewhere around our vicinity because he goes to work on foot daily.(2)The guy must be living somewhere around our place because he walks to work daily.Are both sentences correct? Please enlighten me on this,thanks lot
The structure and use is fine.I would personally use the first form of the verb (live) because "be living" seems to imply that they are only living there temporarily. I would structure it like this: They must live (somewhere) near work (...). "Our place" to me implies my home.
Hi! I have a question, I can't use "couldn't" when I talk about the past? In the video I only saw an example using can't
Yes, you can also use "couldn't."
Wonderful explanation!
'I don't think he meant to be rude.' 'He ……… said sorry.'
i. must have
ii. might have iii. would have
Which is the correct option?
If I'm understanding correctly, I'm not sure any of the options would be correct. If you know for sure he said sorry, then you are not speculating, which is when you would use must, might, etc. "He said sorry" or "He said he was sorry" is enough.
Thanks for sharing I like this a lot :)
You're welcome!
The sound is much better now!!! Excellent
Thank you so much teacher
Can we use conditional sentences in the same way as those modals? To speculate about the past? For example:
If she passed her exams that day, she must have a lot of money now. (past - present)
If they met each other, they probably got married. (past - past)
If he was with her that night we went away, I will definitely kill him when I see him again. (past - future)
If she chose this way, we won't meet her when we get there. (past - future)
If she chose the other way, she may/could have met wolves. (past - past)
If he stole the money, he will/may leave the country soon. (past - future)
I can't use the third conditional in any of these, because I want to convey *a different meaning.*
A: The three of us were working the crops when that ship showed up. We just saw it and ran. I don't know what happened to the rest of the crew.
B: They were by the garage. Over near the spaceport. Right where that ship came down. No way they survived.
C: You don't know that! We survived. If they *made / had made* it to the garage, they could've had a fighting chance! (I don't think the third conditional fits to this context)
Yes, you can, though as you pointed out all of the examples you wtote are factual conditionals. Might and could can (and often ARE) used with the third conditional as well to expresss possibility (might) and ability (could): If you had studied more for the test, you might/could have passed it.
Must and can't, on the other hand, are not used with the thurd conditional.
@@shortenglishlessonswithale268 Thank you for your reply. I appreciate it!
As far as I understand, the third conditional means that something is not real, we know whether something happened or not. When we say "if they *had made..."* we know that they didn't make it. But when we say "if they *made..."* it is either the second conditional or the real past conditional (depending on context).
I used to doubt those sentences were correct because they don't fit to any of 0, 1, 2, 3, mixed conditionals.
0 = Real Present
1 = Real Present/Future
2 = Unreal Present/Future
3 = Unreal Past
Mixed = Unreal Present/Future
Unreal Present = 2, mixed
Unreal Future = 2, mixed
Unreal Past = 3
Real Present = 0, 1
Real Future = 1
Real Past = *?????*
What conditional are such sentences? Is there a name for those?
@@Leo007619 Past real is the correct term but you're right that they are separate from the conditionals you typically see in grammar books (0-3). Somewhat strangely, in my personal experience, many grammar books omit any mention of this type of conditional altogether (with some exceptions).
@@shortenglishlessonswithale268 thank you!
Great job
Wonderful video!
Could you please help me to choose the correct option?
'I don't think he meant to be rude.' 'He ……… said sorry.' i. must have
ii. might have iii. would have
I didn't even get your question..If he really didn't mean to be rude then why should he say sorry for?
Sir could we use could have in place of might/may have for making past or future possible deductions for eg; in a past deduction sentence “he might/may have been sleeping at that time that’s why he didn’t pick up the phone” to “he could have been sleeping at that time that’s why he didn’t pick up the phone” and “he may/might have said so” to “he could have said so”. And in future deduction as “he will/may/might have reached there by tomorrow” to “he could have reached there by tomorrow”. Please help sir. I’d hugely thankful to you.
That's right. In this context may, might, and could (in the affirmative form) have more or less the same meaning.
Short Language Lessons with Alex Rodrigo thank you so much sir. So that now I’ve concluded that for making past deductions may have/ might have / could have are nothing but synonym to each other in the affirmative form. But sir one doubt I have is, for eg in the following sentences-
1.) “hey I can’t find my phone. Oh wait..! I could’ve left it in the home”. And
2.)”I could’ve done better in the exam If I had studied the last unit.”
Sir here in the above sentences as you can see could’ve is used. But former is just an assumption of the past whereas latter one is a conditional sentence and therefore they have totally different meanings. Am I right sir? Sir how to differentiate between them as it becomes quite confusing sometimes. Please help me here sir..!
You're right that most modals can have more than one meaning depending on how we use them. Must, for example, can express probability (like in this case) or obligation. As for could, when used to talk about the past it can generally express either possibility or ability (the past form of can). My recommendation would be to use the context to figure it out. So, for example, if I say that when I was 4 years old I couldn't ride a bike, it is clear that I'm expressing ability. I didn't have the ability to ride a bicycle at that age. However, I would also say that you shouldn't stress too much about what it's expressing as long as you understand the general message being communicated in the sentence. As you practice and expose yourself more to the language it will come naturally to you without having to think about it too much.
Short Language Lessons with Alex Rodrigo thanks for being such a sport sir. It really motivated me. And I believe I’ll get pro asap. 😸
You're welcome! You already seem to be able to communicate in the language pretty well, so getting better shouldn't be a problem. Good luck!!
Can we use have been+adj
He must have been crazy?
I'm waiting ur reply 😊
Is it right to use adj after have been??
Yes. It is actually very common to use an adjective after the verb "to be" and this is no exception.
Thanks a lot
in modals of deduction in the present the opposite of must is can't and in othee video I watched that "couldn't have" for deduction in the past. are can't and couldn't the same for deduction in the past?
That's right. When using them for speculation/deduction, can't and couldn't have basically the same meaning.
Thank you , it was helpful
Very glad to hear it was helpful!!
Nice explanation 👍🏻
Memo Memee thank you! Glad it was helpful. :)
Perfect
Thank you!!
Wouw ya te entiendo 😳👀‼
and plz make a video about (been)
Hey Bro! Why didn't you continue uploading videos?
Hey! Thanks for your feedback. 2018 was a bit hectic so I had to put the UA-cam channel on hold, but I hope to start again in February!
@@shortenglishlessonswithale268 Hurry up, Jajajaj
no es couldn't ?
Can't and couldn't are interchangeable (in this context).
can we use (may have)
Yes, you may. :)