Mastercam's Dynamic Milling Cuts a Part in 1/3 The Time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 жов 2013
  • For more about Dynamic Milling, click here:
    whatsnew.mastercam.com/mill_ge...
    Cycle time and tool wear are shops' constant concerns. Mastercam's dynamic milling is designed to improve both of these with a single powerful technique. Mastercam's Dynamic Milling toolpaths create constantly adapting motion providing smoother, safer cuts. This motion is easier on your machine and can effectively use the full flute length, greatly extending cutter life and often eliminating the need for multiple depth cuts.
    In this video we run a test of Dynamic Milling Opti-Core against traditional milling. Watch to see the difference using this one simple toolpath can make!
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @tagrp
    @tagrp 10 років тому +4

    This is a great comparison of how a 17,000rpm machine is faster than a 8500rpm one(most people can't change spindle capabilities on the fly). To truly show of the how these paths save you time, the same rpm with both toolpaths is needed. BTW I love the new Dynamic TPs and use them daily.

  • @Spencer3PMA
    @Spencer3PMA 10 років тому +9

    Although the Dynamic tool path is far superior, I think it is kind of silly to compare it to hammering a tool into the material at full depth with the traditional offset tool path (left video). It kind of detracts from the video little bit... it would be far more interesting to see the comparison to a high feed indexable cutter because it is really the only realistic alternative to the dyanamic milling/volumill style tool path with an endmill. Anyone who is trying to rough aluminum with an endmill like the video on the left in this day and age is certainly behind the times considering modern tooling options and that HSM toolpath technology (right video) has been around for almost 10 years.

  • @NotTheMan100
    @NotTheMan100 6 років тому +9

    Who would have thought if you doubled the RPM and quadrupled the feed rate it would take less time... Shocking

  • @mtlv004
    @mtlv004 9 років тому +2

    its an old video, but the number one thing the vast majority of the industries forgets to realize its not the speed, but the cubes per minute of material you're able to remove in a given time...

    • @wiraxbox360
      @wiraxbox360 4 роки тому

      the chip material jam the tool?

  • @tubbytimmy8287
    @tubbytimmy8287 10 років тому +1

    Where do you get your speed and feed from to run it like this?

  • @gredangeo
    @gredangeo 7 років тому +3

    It will reduce cycle time for sure, but not as much realistically as shown here. Anyone machining traditionally, will use a face mill in there at a competitive depth of cut and feed fast, to make up lost time.

  • @MotorsportsX
    @MotorsportsX 6 років тому

    first two failure vides are doable with coolant and proper programming and endmills.

  • @capnthepeafarmer
    @capnthepeafarmer 10 років тому

    Has mastercam added BlueSwarf to one of their plugins yet?

  • @B37R4Y3D
    @B37R4Y3D 10 років тому

    translation of IPM please

  • @GrandeBombarde16
    @GrandeBombarde16 10 років тому +1

    IPM-Inches per minute.

  • @TXTHRILLA214
    @TXTHRILLA214 10 років тому

    .250 endmill?? . 2 flute???

  • @yalcin_tan
    @yalcin_tan Рік тому

    dynamic toolpaths are powerful technology, of course, but..
    It was not a fair and rational comparison. The weapon of the classic toolpath strategy is duel with an empty magazine..

  • @chrishumble337
    @chrishumble337 6 років тому +5

    The classic toolpath appears to be made by a toddler. I would fire any programmer on the spot for using idiotic pathing like that. This is bogus.

    • @wiraxbox360
      @wiraxbox360 4 роки тому

      you mean the toolphats? I have had a problem that the tool broke

  • @thepolarpandabear
    @thepolarpandabear 10 років тому

    All it is doing is taking faster smaller cuts