Mao's Art of War: The Long March and the Chinese Civil War

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,3 тис.

  • @realtimehistory
    @realtimehistory  Рік тому +122

    Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with our link: go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
    Watch Red Atoms on Nebula: nebula.tv/redatoms

    • @KanekiKen-cg6nd
      @KanekiKen-cg6nd Рік тому

      Is there an Arabic translation in Nebula?

    • @llllll-mp1zr
      @llllll-mp1zr Рік тому

      I know you are keen on propagating western ideology, but what you said about China's history is too many mistakes, which are totally divorced from reality. You can't wait to play up the opposition. It's so clumsy. At least respect history. Mao was a marginal person in the early days. As you said, Chiang Kai-shek wanted to encircle Mao's regime, which really made people laugh. Moreover, Chiang Kai-shek's leadership of the Kuomintang was full of blood. You didn't say you were worried about the country at all. You even made a mistake in basic common sense. This is what the West called China Studies. In addition to ideology, it is the so-called China who is wrong and thinks he is in his own eyes. An ideological idiot like you will not know that the United States once funded communist party to support Mao Zedong and planned to give up Chiang Kai-shek. History is more than you think.

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому

      Dont mind the likely ccp bots, the cpc thing seems pretty new (and the ccp doesnt even seem to care that much). History is history no matter what anyone has to say. If they try to censor you or make fake reports to intimidate you as many channels seem to deal with, talk to other channels, and get in touch with the media to discuss the issue of possible illegal censorship, as that may involve our rights within our respective countries.

    • @knightlypoleaxe2501
      @knightlypoleaxe2501 Рік тому +2

      1:50 >CCP instead of CPC
      :l

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому +2

      ​​@@knightlypoleaxe2501 Yeah, ccp bots are getting really picky, it seems, even more picky than westerners about how other call their own countries or political parties. Maybe they should just relax. I just hope the channel operator knows that leaving out info to avoid harrasment by alleged bots trying to censor will only hurt the quality of their content and the channel in many cases. Just my opinion.

  • @ZxZ239
    @ZxZ239 Рік тому +2639

    It's really really hard to find anything unbiased on China these days. As someone who research Chinese history, thanks for doing this

    • @Moeflyer6213
      @Moeflyer6213 Рік тому

      Unbiased? He used CCP, the derogative term used by western media to refer the Communist Party of China (CPC)!

    • @deadbydaylight3168
      @deadbydaylight3168 Рік тому +335

      it's that asian hate, my boy. people will hate what's power or what they can't control.

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому +61

      @@deadbydaylight3168 You clearly have not seen the amount of criticism the US and other countries get lol. Welcome to the world. If you dont like free speech, you dont need to be on youtube (you can always stay on censored authoritarian social media if you want). Just my opinion.

    • @deadbydaylight3168
      @deadbydaylight3168 Рік тому +342

      ​@@abcdedfg8340 oh please. im based in the US and i've seen it all and it's not the same when the hegemon is a white man. as for your second statement, i hop between the two although i can tell what you're trying to get at. seems to me you cant distinguish the difference from controlled free speech and no free speech. just my opinion.

    • @zg_rq
      @zg_rq Рік тому +7

      Stop arguing!

  • @leonana11
    @leonana11 Рік тому +1366

    Should have mentioned Mao's "四渡赤水" (crossing the Chishui River four times) around 16:30, one of the most epic moves in military history. Ain't easy to escape from a blockade/siege by enemies that's 15 times of your own size.

    • @王方悦
      @王方悦 Рік тому +258

      After reading the detailed march path of this and knowing more about the heavy groups of enemy armies surrounding Mao's army, i have to see that's really a miracle.
      Most people won't make it even if they have a crystal ball to see the entire field.

    • @赵凡棨
      @赵凡棨 Рік тому +116

      This has been a miracle in human Military history

    • @peppery310
      @peppery310 Рік тому +68

      yes, especially Mao did not have satalites support

    • @hardy0919
      @hardy0919 Рік тому +43

      @@王方悦 crystal ball? actually he has one, it's called 奇门遁甲。Mao is a real expert of all most everything, an unbeatable person

    • @freefree-q5n
      @freefree-q5n Рік тому +103

      I am a Chinese. Chairman MAO is great in all aspects

  • @DanielSanchez-tv6vh
    @DanielSanchez-tv6vh Рік тому +406

    Great to see a continuation of the Chinese Warlord Era content in the _Real Time History_ channel. Certainly, it helps to fill out a gap in my knowledge of the period of history in this region of the world.

    • @realtimehistory
      @realtimehistory  Рік тому +54

      and this is just the first episode of an ever wider series that will last until the end of the Chinese Civil War

    • @nvelsen1975
      @nvelsen1975 Рік тому +13

      @@realtimehistory
      It'll probably have to be titled "Bringing clarity to all the confusion of the Chinese warlord era [10 hours](part 1/ 389)" or something. 😉

    • @wuhaninstituteofvirology5226
      @wuhaninstituteofvirology5226 Рік тому

      ​@@realtimehistoryI like your content but I am disappointed that you did not mention the CCP was actually created by Soviet Russia, just like they created Communist governments in Tuva, Mongolia and Korea.

    • @kalravlabana7707
      @kalravlabana7707 Рік тому

      ​@@realtimehistory eagerly waiting for new videos

    • @olamideolanrewaju4005
      @olamideolanrewaju4005 8 місяців тому

      @@bone3594 Unless you win and become the government 😉

  • @ScratchedWinter
    @ScratchedWinter Рік тому +3488

    sending this to my landlord

  • @jefferycui3574
    @jefferycui3574 Рік тому +342

    Minor correction: The province that in 1933 Japanese demanded demilitarization of is called Hebei (河北), not Hubei (湖北). The province of Hubei is in the central zone of China, to the south of Henan province.

    • @jefferycui3574
      @jefferycui3574 Рік тому +22

      ...and the map showing the province of Hebei is nowadays. Back in 1933 the province of Hebei is much smaller (basically only the southern half of nowadays Hebei, plus the city of Beijing (then Beiping)), the northern half is distributed among the Province of Chahar and Special Disctrict of Rehe.

    • @天源刘
      @天源刘 9 місяців тому +4

      也就这个时候,蒋介石做了一件事吧,花园口决堤😮

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 8 місяців тому

      The narrator can't even get it right. 😄
      It is Not ccp. I'll let you guys find the real acronym.
      He is just repeating what the western propaganda media are saying.

    • @egay86292
      @egay86292 Місяць тому

      Austria/Australia. will they never learn?

  • @tianhaoju4634
    @tianhaoju4634 Рік тому +281

    One factor that were often overlooked even in Chinese sources was that the warlords are often unwilling to cooperate with Chiang. During some of the most famous battles of the long march, such as the assault across Jinsha river, Mao took advantages of the lack of willingness of Sichuan clique to continue the persuit outside of his borders, this also worked when he launched a deceiving attack on Yunnan

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX Рік тому +24

      YES finally some one said it,
      people often blame every single thing on chiang unfairly including the corruption of the kmt, even though majority of the kmt after the war consisted entirely of warlords since majority of the kmt army was devastated after battles with the ija. and these warlords were extremely corrupt

    • @tianhaoju4634
      @tianhaoju4634 Рік тому +10

      @@NeostormXLMAX its rly complicated, chiang often take command of warlords army and get an epic L when persuing the communists. While fighting the communists, he also took the chance to consolidate control over these warlords, but most of the times the communists were able to relocate safely without a big sacrifice

    • @poilochien
      @poilochien Рік тому

      une partie des seigneurs de guerre avaient subis l'influence de l'union soviétique, comme feng yuxiang, par exemple, même le guomindang avait subis l'influence des soviétiques et une bonne partie des cadres de l'armée de la beifa étaient favorables aux communistes ... la différence entre communistes et nationalistes était surtout une question de clientèle politique : les pauvres suivent le PCC et les riches, qui refusent tout changement social comme une réforme agraire, par exemple, suivent le guomindang. mais les premiers étaient largement les plus nombreux. le génie de mao tient dans sa stratégie de guerre souple et dans la politique de front unis le plus large possible pour marginaliser son adversaire ... @@tianhaoju4634

    • @freealter
      @freealter Рік тому +10

      That’s Chiang’s fault for relying on warlords lol

    • @poilochien
      @poilochien Рік тому

      le clan song, c'est pas des seigneurs de la guerre ... @@NeostormXLMAX

  • @davidbosak7503
    @davidbosak7503 Рік тому +168

    13:55 is Mao and the American journalist Edgar Snow. Snow went to visit Mao in Yan'an and interviewed him extensively. He wrote a book called "Red Star Over China" based on his experiences. It is an excellent book. One of the few first-hand accounts of the Chinese Revolution by a Western author.

    • @糖荔
      @糖荔 Рік тому +12

      This book is also one of the required reading books for Chinese students, the kind to be tested, at least the textbook version I learned is like this

    • @Hanks101-r6m
      @Hanks101-r6m 11 місяців тому

      @@糖荔才没有,中国学生99.99%都不知道这本书的存在

    • @jet-nx1me
      @jet-nx1me 11 місяців тому

      ​@@糖荔是什么时期的必读书目?我不确定以前是不是,但是我从来没听说过这本书。我是中国人,05年开始上小学。我的学生生涯必读书目以东西方名著为主,包括三国演义,老人与海,简爱,呼啸山庄和莫泊桑的短篇小说集等等。

    • @vgamedude12
      @vgamedude12 6 місяців тому

      @@davidbosak7503 "snow"
      I know to not trust what is written

    • @johnbrown40639
      @johnbrown40639 4 місяці тому +6

      There’s another less known book by an American journalist Jake Belden, China Shakes the World.

  • @hanchiman
    @hanchiman Рік тому +407

    Mao used a strategy called "Surround cities with villages" 農村包圍城市", basically using the "Poor country side" that is majority of China in early 20th century against the small pockets of cities that has an industry and some wealth, which on the same time based on a game of Weiqi/Go

    • @arminius6506
      @arminius6506 Рік тому

      This is what Taliban did in 2021 and they were controlling rural areas for last 10-15 years waiting for the US to leave

    • @stevenliu3744
      @stevenliu3744 Рік тому +93

      And look at what China is doing now: corporate with 3rd world countries to surround USA and the west😂

    • @网毁青春少年梦
      @网毁青春少年梦 Рік тому

      ​@@stevenliu3744You Westerners are ridiculous, why do you always feel that we Chinese are surrounding you? Sorry we are not interested and we don’t have a system that you like all over the world, how can we surround you? It is obvious that you surrounded, suppressed and smeared China. China is a country with a history of 5,000 years. The dynasties established by the Chinese have never invaded any country since ancient times. China even became their protectorate. A Chinese dynasty has a history of hundreds of years. This is enough to prove that China is peace-loving. What China is doing now is to take back what belongs to it within its own scope. Is it wrong? Unlike you, the West, who have plundered and colonized the world for nearly a hundred years, China is also one of the victims. Don’t be a thief, okay?

    • @tedl922
      @tedl922 Рік тому +9

      At the end of the day is about resources for wars. He was smart enough to figure things out.

    • @hanchiman
      @hanchiman Рік тому +33

      @@tedl922 for me. The whole Mao vs Chiang look similar to ancient war between Liu Bang vs Xiang Yu during the Chu Han contention. Liu Bang is a ruffian deadbeat but charismatic meanwhile Xiang Yu was an educated war hero but arrogant. Liu Bang is a bit like Mao while Xiang Yu is Chiang. Mao had alot of capable loyal generals while Xiang Yu were surrounded by men who were incompetent and self serving

  • @FogelsChannel
    @FogelsChannel Рік тому +29

    Well done! I've read a few books on this topic and I learned new info , plus your clips and photos are amazing

  • @malcolm5514
    @malcolm5514 Рік тому +56

    I know so little about this period. Thank you for making this! (:

    • @王方悦
      @王方悦 Рік тому +6

      I highly encourage you to learn more about the long march, that's nearly a mission impossible.
      Unlikely what's shown in this video, the red army are usually facing warlords both front and back, overwhelming in size. It's nearly a miracle they could make it repeatedly to flee from the encircling and made through.
      I wouldn't make it even in game.

    • @SiriProject
      @SiriProject Рік тому

      Research the May 4th Movement, it was foundational to all of Modern China.
      Search the lives of Cai Yuanpei, Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao. Most revolutionaries were young and had big hopes for China during that period, when China first became aware of science, education and democracy. Most of the late politics before and after the war were initial demands started back during May 4th. They also explain why China's revolution freed women from their traditional roles in China, whereas it didn't in other socialist countries.

    • @Magno_o_Mago-iz1we
      @Magno_o_Mago-iz1we 9 місяців тому +1

      China owes a lot to Mao. From the Communist Revolution to now, the country freed itself from the yoke and exploitation of European colonialist powers, also from supersitition, socialç e economic chaos, backwardness and rampant corruption, and today it is the second economy in the world, the largest manufacturer, exporter, sending rovers to the moon and to Mars, and is the BIGGEST CREDITOR OF THE UNITED STATES. I'd like Brasil have one Mao!

  • @petercevallos258
    @petercevallos258 Рік тому +703

    The unity of opposites is actually a principle in dialectics that Mao took from Lenin's writings on philosophy, not Sun Tzu. In later interviews he actually said most of his military writings didn't come from Sun Tzu at all, but from applying dialectics to military strategy.

    • @petercevallos258
      @petercevallos258 Рік тому +118

      Even the references from Clauswitz came from Lenin, who often referenced him and referred to him as the time periods most profound military thinker.

    • @user-joker2011
      @user-joker2011 Рік тому

      in china ,someone believes mao is not Marxist,a Legalists follower

    • @LuisAldamiz
      @LuisAldamiz Рік тому +145

      It's also a very old concept in Daoism, let's not be so Eurocentric, OK? Sure: there's a Western concept of dialectics (which is not Lenin's, not even Marx' it goes all the way to the ancient Greeks and is maybe even older) but there's also an Eastern tradition of such ideas, which is essentially independent (even if it did not evolve independently into Marxism, I'm sure we can find many native precursors, much like we find them in the West too).

    • @theheadshot45
      @theheadshot45 Рік тому

      Correct, but Real Time History and the World War Two channel don't read any Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, or Mao so they don't know anything about socialist theory.

    • @sankarchaya
      @sankarchaya Рік тому +94

      @@LuisAldamiz I was under the impression that Mao drew from all of these influences. there's an interesting conceptual overlap between Hegelian philosophy and Daoist thought

  • @bigsmile715
    @bigsmile715 Рік тому +68

    Small error. At 8:40, the man on the right is not ZHOU Enlai, he is ZHU De, who was the Red Army commander.

    • @egay86292
      @egay86292 Місяць тому

      exact. like mistaking Kissinger for Eisenhower.

  • @逸徐-t3f
    @逸徐-t3f Рік тому +438

    Very objective video without traditional western biases. The reason why KMT failed is losing support from Chinese peasants . Roc was still an old empire controlled by landlords. The majority of Chinese people were peasants and they struggled in starvation, which gave CCP a chance to strive.

    • @krellio9006
      @krellio9006 Рік тому +44

      the irony is after the war is over Mao send food over to soviet instead of feeding its people :)))))

    • @Paochinblog
      @Paochinblog Рік тому +2

      And after peasants served their purpose, many were killed during the cultural revolution. Now CCP is the biggest landlord in the whole of China

    • @xblade11230
      @xblade11230 Рік тому +1

      @@Paochinblog Lol under Mao China's population went from 546 mil -> 916 mil in 25 years
      This was the largest growth in china's population percentagewise throughout history
      You can check that statistics below they are taken directly from wikipedia
      1900 400,000,000
      1928 474,780,000
      1950 546,815,000
      1975 916,395,000
      1982 1,008,180,000
      2000 1,262,645,000
      2005 1,303,720,000
      2010 1,337,825,000
      The mao killed X million people, comes from a number that a guy basically made up, yes people starved to death under Mao, but more people starved to death before Mao when the landlords owned all the land.
      But the statistics show that people under Mao died less than they did before mao thus resulting in a 400 mil pop increase over 23 years

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому +86

      @@krellio9006 What i remember reading is that the prc was trying to industrialize. And at the time, the main thing they could export in exchange for industrial technology and assistance was food. I do not know the details of how it worked, someone else may know more.

    • @krellio9006
      @krellio9006 Рік тому

      @@abcdedfg8340 also they sold every bit of steel and scrap they could find to soviet too
      just for national prestige that "China can into industry too!"

  • @ameliah8164
    @ameliah8164 Рік тому +198

    You even mentioned the white terror in 1927. Thank you for your neutral and objective introduction to History of China ❤ You are a respected historical disseminator

  • @tarotaro6933
    @tarotaro6933 Рік тому +83

    Battle of Chishui River is the most epic and miracle battle in modern history, no doubt about that.

  • @ameliah8164
    @ameliah8164 Рік тому +626

    My grandfather's brother died in the Chinese Civil War, but none of his relatives resented the Communist Party. Because at that time, even if it was necessary to collect military rations, Mao's army would write grain IOUs and mobilize people to voluntarily protect their hometown, rather than forcibly taking others as soldiers like Chiang Kai shek's army (like Ukraine now).
    Chiang Kai shek lost the support of the peasant class, which made him almost lose everything.

    • @yunflu6320
      @yunflu6320 Рік тому

      只能说蒋介石在大陆太不做人了,尽失民心,能把绝对优势打成最后败逃台湾也是真牛,不过唯一做的好事就是生了蒋经国

    • @elikim3968
      @elikim3968 Рік тому +18

      @criszisyeah idk what the commenter is smoking bro
      prob listens to TASS

    • @enteraft
      @enteraft Рік тому +1

      @criszis If your definition of "draft"is equivalent to kidnaping random mens on the street then the Chiang Kai shek style draft do make a perfect comparison with what Ukraine has been doing since a few month after the war started. So yea, like Ukraine now.

    • @cocoonwind
      @cocoonwind Рік тому +69

      In fact, Ukraine's conscription primarily started with individuals who had military experience, and it was relatively fair for most of the nation. In contrast, Chiang Kai-shek and all other warlords in China followed the ancient Chinese conscription method, forcibly enlisting individuals. Many people died before even reaching the military units. Additionally, at that time, apart from the CCP, most warlord forces had significant issues with embezzlement and officers withholding military pay, leading to many Nationalist soldiers not getting enough to eat. Comparatively, the CCP's forces were more democratic in this regard. Once funds reached the grassroots units, they were managed democratically, ensuring that grassroots soldiers ate better than Nationalist soldiers. This is also one of the reasons for the Communist Party's strong military combat capability.

    • @cicies_mc
      @cicies_mc Рік тому

      chiang looted the whole country with releasing fake money and left all people straving,they just carry all the treasure of china and fled to taiwan.they accept the us protection, knowing that the us want us to be divided.and the first lady even suggest to the american once that they should nuke the mainland.that's why people don't want them to lead.useless.

  • @ipfreak
    @ipfreak Рік тому +136

    8:17 those were KMT soldiers. mao's red army never had any soviet military equipment until korea war. during the war against japanese, soviet weapons from USSR were distributed to KMT troops, not red army.

    • @spss33
      @spss33 Рік тому +9

      Infact the first soviet weapon arrived to ccp was in korean war

    • @Specificify
      @Specificify Рік тому +1

      not true, soviets started giving equipment in 1945

    • @syue6544
      @syue6544 9 місяців тому +9

      @@Specificifythose were Japanese left weapons in Manchuria, not actually Soviet Union produced weapons.

    • @Magno_o_Mago-iz1we
      @Magno_o_Mago-iz1we 9 місяців тому +16

      China owes a lot to Mao. From the Communist Revolution to now, the country freed itself from the yoke and exploitation of European colonialist powers, also from supersitition, socialç e economic chaos, backwardness and rampant corruption, and today it is the second economy in the world, the largest manufacturer, exporter, sending rovers to the moon and to Mars, and is the BIGGEST CREDITOR OF THE UNITED STATES. I'd like Brasil have one Mao!

    • @simonnachreiner8380
      @simonnachreiner8380 7 місяців тому

      @@Magno_o_Mago-iz1we Brazil doesn't have 45 million to spare. If brazil has a "great leap forward" _incident_ with numbers it would be 1/4 people dead.

  • @theeliminatedai7321
    @theeliminatedai7321 Рік тому +333

    This video only mentions the could-be things Red Army maybe have done in the long march, but ignores totally what KMT have done in JiangXi, a total revenge slaughter, in which many former red region villagers were slaughtered empty, goverment supported massacre.

    • @王方悦
      @王方悦 Рік тому +138

      Chang literally said "(here) every stone must be fired, and every bloodline must be cut".
      A tyrant that should be nailed on shame if he isn't a sweet ally of the United States

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому +12

      @@王方悦 Even in Taiwan/ROC, i heard Chiang Kai shek is quite controversial in terms of how he governed the country. What do you think about how the CCP conducted itself during the civil war (from a strictly historical viewpoint, I am not justifying any bad behavior during that civil war, it was a tough time for many people), because civil wars based on what I read can often be very tragic for all involved.

    • @xinlugong-wv5yy
      @xinlugong-wv5yy Рік тому +3

      @@abcdedfg8340 what's the the opinion on the civial war in Taiwan. as a man
      who lived in china, I'm really curious about it

    • @hectormuro2053
      @hectormuro2053 Рік тому

      I doubt this was any worse than what king Leopold did in the Congo, or what Europe did during the onslaught on Africa and the enslavement of human beings for profit, or the genocide of Native Americans to usurp their land.

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому +16

      @@xinlugong-wv5yy I think taiwan has a more open debate on what both sides did. There seems to be a strong awareness that chiang kai shek could be quite ruthless, but also that mao and the ccp seems to have been quite ruthless as well. But having said that it was a civil war, and civil wars seem to be rough on civilians regardless of their personal allegiances. I think you are lucky you can discuss this as history rather than experiencing it in person. You may want to learn more about the refugees that fled the ccp, leaving for hong kong or taiwan. It could reveal more about the historical truth of the matter.

  • @spss33
    @spss33 Рік тому +14

    Thanks for your brilliant works! It's so rare to see some real historical research on the China Civil War on youtube.

  • @juneten600
    @juneten600 11 місяців тому +25

    在长征之前的井岗山,毛因他远超众人的军事才能和眼界,受到了高层的冷遇和迫害,每次遇到危机时,他们会启用毛,危机过后再次闲置他。
    直到长征无力再进行下去,在遵义这个地方,所有高层共同讨论决议,才确定了毛的领导地位。
    所以毛的崛起不是历史的偶然,当时的历史必须选择了他。
    但是,这个国家出现了毛亦可说是偶然,因为前后追溯,很难找到第二个有能力半路带领一个危在旦夕的团队和国家走出困境的人。
    另外还有一件毛亲口对斯诺说的趣事:“1927年,他在秋收起义时被民团抓获,他用了银元行贿,最终惊险逃脱。”

    • @sjinyi1991
      @sjinyi1991 4 місяці тому +1

      天选之人!

    • @whiteingale
      @whiteingale 10 днів тому

      exactly, he was chosen as a puppet by russian soviets, lol you should be grateful to us, little pussies.

    • @winstonwho
      @winstonwho 2 дні тому

      and being as brutal, ignorant and oppressive as a human can be helped too.
      mao destroyed china. taiwan is real china. mainland is mao's china where he destroyed every bit of Chinese history he could find and to this day, it's just mao hangover china.
      the leaders are all still mao educated which means:
      the education, emotional stability and maturity of your average elemetary school child

  • @jankusthegreat9233
    @jankusthegreat9233 Рік тому +11

    This is my favorite channel ever

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 Рік тому +25

    Incredible documentary, informative as always!

    • @yyds66666
      @yyds66666 Рік тому

      他的内容有错误的地方,而且故意不讲一些国民党的恶劣事迹,共产党夺取政权,靠的不光是武力,而是人民的力量,

  • @joiedevie3901
    @joiedevie3901 Рік тому +1

    Great piece, Jesse, and nice to see you bring your talented narrative to this chapter of world history. You do such a wonderful job of laying out the sequence of events where each clearly sets the context for what follows while all the time using that gift for modulation to place just the right emphasis on just the right phrase to make your point.
    One imagines that yours would be the most popular class on any campus.

  • @宇白-t5c
    @宇白-t5c 11 місяців тому +5

    This video is such a refreshment especially after those StateBall video full of mistakes,thanks for the job well done,中国人给你点赞👍

  • @weesertan7818
    @weesertan7818 Рік тому +28

    Nice video. There is a typo at 8:43. The gentleman together with Mao is Zhu De, not Zhou Enlai.

    • @ThisNinjaSays_
      @ThisNinjaSays_ Рік тому

      True Zhou Enlai's eyebrows are missing. History lovers know Zhou and Brezhnev's eyebrows.

    • @leonardpearlman4017
      @leonardpearlman4017 11 місяців тому

      I think so! You can see several pictures of him in Snow's book, he has a pretty distinctive appearance.

  • @indianajones4321
    @indianajones4321 Рік тому +12

    Nice video

  • @neues3691
    @neues3691 Рік тому +42

    Mit der chinesischen Geschichte wird einem nie langweilig.

    • @leibian6059
      @leibian6059 Рік тому

      去探索吧,这里的故事比一千零一夜的股市还要有趣

    • @ChenJ.K.
      @ChenJ.K. 9 місяців тому

      "Geschichte":
      The Thirsty Years War happens every 300 years in China, from Bronze age to modern day. Thankfully we don't need to have any war nowadays

  • @Flyinghigh3597
    @Flyinghigh3597 Рік тому +15

    @2:53 Chiang KaiShek (CKS) has never studied military theory in Moscow. Instead he studied military subjects in Japan and studying in a Japanese military academy.

    • @davidbosak7503
      @davidbosak7503 Рік тому +2

      That's right. I caught that mistake also.

    • @poilochien
      @poilochien Рік тому +1

      il a étudié les affaire militaire à baoding, au japon et en russie ...

    • @bosunbill9059
      @bosunbill9059 9 місяців тому +4

      Funniest part, he didn't study at a proper Japanese Military Academy unlike many of the KMT warlords.
      But a lesser tuition under the Japanese Military academy and didn't actually graduate, because he wasn't the best student.
      During a meet up of the ex Japanese Academy graduate club organised by many KMT generals, many alumni was surprised to hear Chiang was amongst the list despite never meeting him.
      However due to Chiang donating a large sum to the club and the fact that he is the Generalissimo, they just tolerate his presence.

  • @jufu925
    @jufu925 11 місяців тому +8

    the only youtube video and comment section that doesn't give me a seizure on how little westeners know about china, and using that as an excuse to randomly produce hate and straight up misinformation

  • @Harold_Joseph
    @Harold_Joseph Рік тому +25

    It's hard to find someone who has studied the history of China so deeply.

  • @pgdog888
    @pgdog888 Рік тому +259

    My father joined the PLA at age 15 to fight Japanese and then fought against KMT and kick them out of Canton province.

    • @weefwaffer9034
      @weefwaffer9034 Рік тому +52

      bravery and respect beyond comprehension

    • @mattluck2826
      @mattluck2826 Рік тому +40

      Based father

    • @wisdomleader85
      @wisdomleader85 Рік тому +7

      How was he treated during the "cultural revolution"? I heard the CCP faction under general Peng Dehuai that advocated for a more active role against the Japanese was later purged.

    • @pgdog888
      @pgdog888 Рік тому

      @LeckMichImArsch my father was protected by his students. The west misleading the culture revolution. It was a power take over between 2 fractions in the communist party. All that other BS outside just to draw the attention away from it. The west never till today told the truth about culture revolution. Tens of thousands of high school and college students die between clashes between each other. Don't believe a thing the West says. Lies

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus Рік тому +8

      I can't imagine he did much fighting against the Japanese.

  • @komakush3358
    @komakush3358 Рік тому +68

    Now some people can understand why Taiwan issue is actually the unfinished China civil war.

    • @leonardpearlman4017
      @leonardpearlman4017 Рік тому +2

      This seems perfectly obvious! I think we have to work hard to NOT understand it! Also talking about Taiwan in terms of "Democracy" is pretty special, requires history to start on a specific day to make your argument. If someone has ONE election we might call them a democracy, if we approve of the election result.

    • @火箭翻墙
      @火箭翻墙 10 місяців тому

      @@leonardpearlman4017 Taiwan's "democratic" politics may have been worthy of China's observation and learning 20 years ago, but now? DPP is the most corrupt political party in the world.

    • @roro-v3z
      @roro-v3z 3 місяці тому

      @@leonardpearlman4017

  • @神無-d4r
    @神無-d4r Рік тому +13

    Crossing Chishui river the fourth times during The Long March was an extremely smart Military operation.

  • @tinyraskalGz
    @tinyraskalGz Рік тому +228

    Interesting how you chose to not mention how the kmt left the people of Nanking to defend themselves as they fled before the Japanese. Where as the commies fought where they could. That is a big factor of why the commies had more support

    • @tinyraskalGz
      @tinyraskalGz Рік тому +10

      I geuss he deleted his comment now … logic prevailed over propaganda. 👍

    • @treystewart731
      @treystewart731 Рік тому +16

      ​@Yibay This is a joke, right?

    • @dirremoire
      @dirremoire Рік тому +36

      The term "landlords" is somewhat of a misnomer intends to create a sense of some sympathy for us in the capitalists West. Many of the great landlords were little more than slave owners.

    • @mariano98ify
      @mariano98ify Рік тому

      ​@@dirremoire that might be for your small eastern mind, but by the middle of the XX century landlords were owners with close ties to politicians just like today.

    • @mariano98ify
      @mariano98ify Рік тому +1

      ​@A J that sound awesome! I hope and I am sure billions won't die because Chariman Mao commanded to kill "some" Mockingbirds.

  • @sw9276
    @sw9276 Рік тому +37

    Great video! The best I've ever seen made by an English channel from a perspective of west culture. Chairman Mao was probably the greatest strategist ever in human history. However, we must know that his thinking "serve the people wholeheartedly" is actually THE key feature that distinguishes the Chinese Red Army and PLA nowadays from all other armies. The people's army is undefeatable!
    Found bugs: 1. On 8:40, the second man from the right in the photo is Zhu De (朱德), not Zhou Enlai (周恩来) 2. On 11:13, it should be He Bei (河北) province, not Hu Bei (湖北)

    • @jacobscholtissek2410
      @jacobscholtissek2410 Рік тому

      the Chinese Red Army is undeafeted cause they dont fought against the japanese
      the KMT was defeated by tha Japanese and Mao just picked up the fruit

    • @Civman-yr8lb
      @Civman-yr8lb Рік тому

      So undefeatable they lost to Vietnam

    • @evancooper7259
      @evancooper7259 11 місяців тому

      @@Civman-yr8lb you are so funny,bro. Do you know the real history😆

    • @Civman-yr8lb
      @Civman-yr8lb 11 місяців тому

      @@evancooper7259 China invaded Vietnam and lost. Doesn't everyone know that?

    • @evancooper7259
      @evancooper7259 11 місяців тому

      @@Civman-yr8lb haha

  • @shayneb3540
    @shayneb3540 11 місяців тому +3

    You have to admit Mao was definitely a military genius. He played the long game with Chiang Kai-Shek and in the end made him look like a fool.

  • @zhu_zi4533
    @zhu_zi4533 Рік тому +10

    11:16 This is the map of Hubei Province today, which is completely different from the boundary of Hebei Province at that time. The empty area in the middle is the capital Beijing and the municipality directly under the Central Government Tianjin. At the same time, Rehe Province was also revoked in history and merged into Hubei and Shanxi.

  • @bigchunk1
    @bigchunk1 Рік тому +41

    Your team's work is always quality, in-depth history. I decided to get Nebula through the Real Time History deal, though it's likely to benefit me moreso than you. Looking forward to Red Atoms.

  • @benjaminchinn9958
    @benjaminchinn9958 Рік тому +17

    in chinese long history, only a few men could rise from commoner to emperor or Supreme leaders...ie. Liu bang, liu yu, zhu yuan zhang and Mao Zedong.....therefore, no matter you like him or not, Mao is really a genius

  • @rpgbb
    @rpgbb Рік тому +7

    “The Conquerors” by André Malraux is a highly recommended reading

  • @TV-jg2kj
    @TV-jg2kj Рік тому +102

    Chiang Kai-shek was able to tolerate the warlords and get their troops and support because he had to keep going to war with the warlords to control each city. But this ultimately led to calculations that weren't for the government and the country during the civil war between the Communist Party and the Kuomintang, resulting in many warlords surrendering or betraying the Communist Party.

  • @banerjeesiddharth05
    @banerjeesiddharth05 Рік тому +5

    Very nice documentary 👌

  • @HAJIME_Vlog_1982
    @HAJIME_Vlog_1982 Рік тому +5

    At 8'40'' the man in picture not Zhou Enlai but Zhu De.

  • @BiNumLi
    @BiNumLi Місяць тому

    Thank you. So balanced in treatment of the various parties. A time and place in history not taught in the West but informative of current affairs.

  • @aliyangco8178
    @aliyangco8178 Рік тому +10

    Best non-bias history video ❤

  • @chiahungli3678
    @chiahungli3678 Рік тому +8

    The first sentence is incorrect. Qing dynasty ruled China for less than 300 years. To be precise, it's 268 years, from 1644-1911.

  • @AYAYKEKE
    @AYAYKEKE 11 місяців тому +41

    As a Chinese, I am shocked by the objectivity of this video. This is the first time in my two years abroad that I have seen an objective video about Chinese history.

    • @realtimehistory
      @realtimehistory  11 місяців тому +5

      thanks, we hope you like our other videos about the 2nd Sino-Japanese War too

    • @poka26ev2
      @poka26ev2 Місяць тому

      @IronMan-r5o6f
      中华人民共和国 is different of 中国, one says people republic of China and the other is China, the difference is that the PRC 🇨🇳 is only the mainland excluding the ROC, Hong Kong and Macau, “China” is the PRC, HK, Macau and ROC together, the ROC is the Republic of China 🇹🇼, which includes Taiwan, all the islands right under Okinawa(excluding Okinawa itself), all the Chinese island and the 11 line in the South-China sea.
      Taiwan is not a country, the ROC🇹🇼 is.
      China is not a country, the PRC🇨🇳 is.

    • @poka26ev2
      @poka26ev2 Місяць тому

      @IronMan-r5o6f
      The difference between cultural and political borders

    • @yumimluo
      @yumimluo День тому

      @@poka26ev2roc is not a country,just a rebel government

  • @pjopitz
    @pjopitz Рік тому +90

    Chang didn't defeat the warlords so much as buy their cooperation.

    • @陈一搏-v3q
      @陈一搏-v3q Рік тому

      Chiang only wanted to be a ruler and enjoy wealth and power but not save the country. Truman detested him so much because Chiang was too corrupt, Americans gave him a lot of aid in the form of weapons and money, then they found Chiang saved the money in American bank for interests and sold the weapons back to USA.

  • @MrDeeBro79
    @MrDeeBro79 16 днів тому

    It always makes me wonder about the old film footage who's behind the camera how they get these moments, and how they protect the film all these years and keep all the equipment in working order or not get stolen

  • @MK-jc6us
    @MK-jc6us Рік тому +14

    Great video! Soviet support to Li Lisan is the very beginning of the Sino-Soviet split. Not the only cause but the first of a series of events that would corrode the Sino-Soviet relationship. Soviet Union also tried to flirt with Chiang himself for a while. I read that Mao was expelled from the party, his CCP was not the same of Li's.
    PS. Only negative remark I have is on 24:00 when the Japanese surrender is (unintentionally?) framed as a direct consequence of the A bombings. There is no consensus on this and the logic seems to point to another direction (Japanese surrender after the Soviet Union sweeping through Manchuria and menacing the invasion of Hokkaido) + diplomatic impossibility of Japan getting a not so bad deal with the US using the "neutral" Soviet mediation.

  • @monkeyx8456
    @monkeyx8456 Рік тому +231

    Mao is indeed a person with great military talent

    • @xingw9358
      @xingw9358 Рік тому +37

      And also a great poet, but a bad economist

    • @savy1917
      @savy1917 Рік тому +5

      *L*mao

    • @huangshabaizhan326
      @huangshabaizhan326 Рік тому +25

      Mao Zedong was not just a military figure, he had a strong understanding of economics, science, and politics. Even if he's not a scientist

    • @xingw9358
      @xingw9358 Рік тому

      @@huangshabaizhan326 But polluted by a bad wife

    • @huangshabaizhan326
      @huangshabaizhan326 Рік тому +14

      @@xingw9358 There is no pollution, his failure is destined, and no political entity in the world can avoid class and corruption. Mao attempted to change this phenomenon

  • @JJ-yg1sf
    @JJ-yg1sf Рік тому +234

    The more research in Mao, the more you will find Mao is the greatest war expert in last 1000 in human history.

    • @lqx6710
      @lqx6710 Рік тому +42

      But now, some people are misinterpreting him, denying everything about him from all angles. Oh my goodness!😢

    • @louiswu6300
      @louiswu6300 Рік тому +7

      yup, the army he leads is 100 times better than Zugeliang in 'the three kingdoms.'

    • @CannibaLouiST
      @CannibaLouiST Рік тому +9

      No, he stole the credits from his generals

    • @REALGUCHENG
      @REALGUCHENG Рік тому +30

      @@CannibaLouiSTHe is the main leader.

    • @davidbosak7503
      @davidbosak7503 Рік тому +36

      He was indeed extremely inventive. I think it was his lack of formal military training that made him that way. He read of lot of military history. But in the end he had to figure out everything himself based on the circumstances at hand. As a result, he did a lot of unexpected things that totally confounded Chiang Kai Shek.

  • @yunflu6320
    @yunflu6320 Рік тому +83

    The Long March is incredible. To a certain extent, there would be no Chinese Communist Party without Mao Zedong. If Mao Zedong was not in Jiangxi at that time, the Communist Party might have been wiped out by Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang troops.

    • @baspagrey1545
      @baspagrey1545 Рік тому +3

      Communism would have rose up no matter what, China's geography just can't handle capitalism

    • @Spud69420
      @Spud69420 Рік тому

      @@baspagrey1545 true

    • @johnwilliam4287
      @johnwilliam4287 Рік тому +5

      ​@@baspagrey1545我认同你的观点,所以我在努力让现在的中国从资本主义转向共产主义,许多中国人认为中国已经不再是共产主义了,甚至比美国要资本主义。我今年23岁,以前我讨厌共产主义,而现在我是一个坚定的毛主义者。

    • @BensonMTG
      @BensonMTG Рік тому +1

      Wumao commie bot.

    • @Kai-px6vi
      @Kai-px6vi Рік тому

      @@baspagrey1545不知道會很多年後了,中國經濟也會很差。因為毛澤東的農村包圍城市,游擊反抗真的是神來一筆,再加上毛領導下的統一戰線,才是共產崛起的原因。共產國際主導的圍攻城市,只能讓共產黨慢性死亡。中國的軍閥勢力,地主階級勢力和帝國主義勢力太強,按照以前的共產黨的策略,無差別打倒地主和資產階級,在中國絕對無法成功,只有毛一個人懂得團結小資產階級和民族資產階級和富農的重要性

  • @Kikidindongji
    @Kikidindongji 9 місяців тому +1

    Objectively and truthfully speaking, I am glad to see such authenticity on UA-cam. Instead of prejudice and lies.

  • @chrislim2487
    @chrislim2487 Рік тому +3

    Very educational!!

  • @maxchen9185
    @maxchen9185 Рік тому +5

    6:40 that quote is from my Poli-Sci professor at Boston University. What a pleasant little surprise!

  • @godlikewr888
    @godlikewr888 8 місяців тому +6

    One of my friend's great-grandfathers was in The Long March with the 1st Division. They did walk the distance they claimed and had a few major battles.

    • @gstlb
      @gstlb 6 місяців тому

      Well I guess it’s nice that you believe him but it’s hardly convincing evidence.

    • @WhenInDarknessSeekTheLight
      @WhenInDarknessSeekTheLight 3 місяці тому

      ​@@gstlbsorry cia propaganda have no power here.

  • @Kalafinwë
    @Kalafinwë Рік тому +1

    Amazing introduction 0:00 - 4:00

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 Рік тому +1

    More wonderfulness value than wonderful value 👌....thank you for sharing

  • @JimHoh3
    @JimHoh3 Рік тому +157

    Wrong: It was not "the West and Japan went to war with China, and defeated China"
    Correction: It was "the West and Japan invaded China, and defeated China".

    • @起航-r3w
      @起航-r3w Рік тому

      胡说八道,日本从来没有打败中国,日本和德国是二战战败国!对,日本侵略了中国!

    • @gamincaimin9954
      @gamincaimin9954 Рік тому +10

      I mean, same thing

    • @peacelover373
      @peacelover373 Рік тому +19

      ​@@gamincaimin9954 No it is NOT!

    • @gamincaimin9954
      @gamincaimin9954 Рік тому +3

      @@peacelover373 wdym

    • @hao5616
      @hao5616 Рік тому +44

      @@gamincaimin9954 War seem a neutral word ,blurred the purpose and nature of the behavior . German invaded Poland ,German went to war with Poland,feel the different?

  • @越来越不懂
    @越来越不懂 Рік тому +13

    Thank you for your serious work, very clear and accurate explanation

    • @yyds66666
      @yyds66666 Рік тому

      我是一个中国人,很负责任的告诉你,他的内容有很多错误,

    • @WaterFox117
      @WaterFox117 Рік тому

      @@yyds66666 比如说?

    • @yyds66666
      @yyds66666 Рік тому

      @@WaterFox117 一个月过去了,我都忘了内容了,懒得再看一遍,自己查历史去吧

  • @sampsongao9245
    @sampsongao9245 Рік тому +32

    8:42 Minor mistake about the name tag. The Red Army Commander was Zhu De, not Zhou Enlai.

  • @TalayPembeci
    @TalayPembeci 3 місяці тому

    Great video. And, I want to ask, is there a movie depicting the Long March in an objective manner? I reckon such a movie would be great.

    • @bryanzhan4050
      @bryanzhan4050 2 місяці тому

      nope cuz nothing is completely objective

  • @khaid.5167
    @khaid.5167 Рік тому +275

    As an American, I would say Chairman Mao is the great leader of working class with military talent, no doubt about that.

    • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
      @kaimingraymondchoi9909 Рік тому +4

      Mao could not take China without help from United States. May be you would like to read the interesting comments that I posted.

    • @truthzhao
      @truthzhao Рік тому +76

      ​@@kaimingraymondchoi9909 Nonsense, the US assisted the Chinese Kuomintang, and it was the Soviet Union that assisted the Chinese Communist Party.

    • @kaimingraymondchoi9909
      @kaimingraymondchoi9909 Рік тому +3

      @@truthzhao Did I not say it was a silly mistake made by US? Are you nonsense, or I am nonsense? Haha.

    • @truthzhao
      @truthzhao Рік тому +1

      @@kaimingraymondchoi9909 The "haha" you put at the end of your sentence makes you look like a 🤡.
      Without the "help" of Japan, the United States could not have participated in World War II; without the "help" of Germany, the Soviet Union could not have become a superpower. Is this the logic you want others to know from the translator?😅
      Are you trying to say that the U.S. supports the KMT in launching a civil war in order to justify the occupation by Mao Zedong? Then you are really a "little smart ghost". I am afraid that "indirect help" does not even count.😅

    • @iforgottosignoutagain8181
      @iforgottosignoutagain8181 Рік тому +45

      @@truthzhao The Soviet Union also assisted the Kuomintang funnily enough. They wanted to keep China divided for the most part to prevent stability and Stalin also preferred Chiang Kai Shek at the time. He wasn't so fond of Mao Zedong.

  • @AmarBongo123
    @AmarBongo123 4 місяці тому +12

    As an Indian, I found Mao to be a great strategist and tremendous farseeing guy.
    I literally wish if we could go back in time 100 years back and instead of negotiator Gandhi, someone like Mao be there to fight for your Independence then the peasant class which was no better than Chinese or even worser due to constant artificial famines along with the whole working class, students, youth & of course the fragmented armed rebellious groups in every pockets could have been united and then even moderates too would join like the same fiere wind & tempest taking advantage of its high rural hinterland surrounding the few Colonial Cities and if would succeed either we be could have been freed as a unified Republic without any partition or even internal power strifes and so a true Independence dismantling all colonial legacy systems which continues till this very day.

    • @dunzhen
      @dunzhen 4 місяці тому

      Hard to believe now, but I believe India and China will have pretty decent relations in the not distant future. We will grow together. That said, on the ground, person-to-person level, I think your average Indian will hate China for a long time

    • @lixingyun4571
      @lixingyun4571 3 місяці тому +4

      Mao once said: "You don't have to miss me all the time, learn from me, become me, surpass me, you are me!"

    • @dunzhen
      @dunzhen 3 місяці тому

      @@lixingyun4571 fire quote

    • @YingjieYang-ChampY
      @YingjieYang-ChampY Місяць тому

      ​@@dunzhen The original quote is from a speech he said to students from uni once. He said:" The world is ours, and ir is also yours, but eventually it will be yours. Young generation like you are like sun in the morning, up in the sky, you will eventually shine as the sun"

  • @aleverettes2789
    @aleverettes2789 Рік тому +72

    18:00
    I must point out even the numbers may have exaggerated elements about the Long March, there was a conversion error
    The number of "twelve thousand" frequently used in Mainland sources is counted in old Chinese miles, which roughly converted to 400~450 meters
    So according to the number claimed by CCP the actual travel distance is about 4800-5200km

    • @kowishto
      @kowishto Рік тому +10

      *CPC

    • @xsu-is7vq
      @xsu-is7vq Рік тому +48

      no. The official claim is 25000 Chinese miles, which convert to 12500 km as the video says. But this is not the distance of the main route, but the combined distance marched by all red army units since start of long march.

    • @aleverettes2789
      @aleverettes2789 Рік тому +13

      @@xsu-is7vq that is true, it was 25 thousand Chinese miles instead of 12 thousand I remembered it wrong

    • @风与月
      @风与月 Рік тому +18

      你这个认知还不如纸上谈兵,军队作战模式下前进丶包围丶穿插丶反包围丶反穿插丶诱敌深入这都是行军距离

    • @theeliminatedai7321
      @theeliminatedai7321 Рік тому +12

      @@风与月 四渡赤水弯弯绕绕都很长距离了

  • @redoktopus3047
    @redoktopus3047 7 місяців тому +5

    Mao is seriously up there in the top 5 generals of all time.
    Imagine if the Gauls had a leader that defeated Rome. That's Mao.

  • @Kariakas
    @Kariakas 3 місяці тому

    Great objective overview.

  • @SL4PSH0CK
    @SL4PSH0CK Рік тому +1

    Subbed, love the facing, I had a fun time learning and how easy to digest.

  • @ThisNinjaSays_
    @ThisNinjaSays_ Рік тому +13

    I don't think I'll ever understand Chiang Kai-Shek. 😕
    He reminds me of that fanatic Catholic South Vietnamese dictator that Americans liquidated.
    Men who cannot compromise and be pragmatic when the need arises should never lead countries.

    • @Gowen09Tang
      @Gowen09Tang Рік тому +2

      I had the same feeling! Chiang seemed a downright dictator. China might have been a totally different country should Sun Yat-Sen had lived longer or should Chiang not be the successor of Sun.

    • @poilochien
      @poilochien Рік тому

      c'est très facile à comprendre : la majorité de ses officiers et de sa clientèle étaient des propriétaires de terre ... en 1926, durant le début de la bei fa, les organisations de paysans, soutenues par le PCC, commencent à se saisir des terres dans le sillage des armées remontant depuis guangzhou. les nationalistes ont tout simplement réalisé en avril 1927 un pivotement d'alliance : abandonner l'alliance soviétique pour récupérer l'alliance avec les puissances impérialistes anticommunistes. qui l'ont reconnus et leur ont prêté l'argent dont ils avaient besoin pour continuer la guerre.
      même en 1948, les nationalistes refusent toute réforme agraire ...
      toutes les grandes révolutions de l'aire moderne ( france, mexique, russie, chine ) ont eu la question du terrain pour question centrale .

  • @augustwolf_2256
    @augustwolf_2256 Рік тому +18

    slight nit pick, the party's official name is the Communist Party of China (CPC) not CCP, despite the later acronym commonly being used by the media and western public.

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 Рік тому +1

      Question, doesnt the ccp use the cpc and cpp acronyms interchangeably? The chinese characters literally read chinese communist party lol. I dont think it really matters tbh, do you refer to the democrats, or many other political parties by their official names? Its probably more trouble than its worth.

    • @walden6272
      @walden6272 Рік тому

      @@abcdedfg8340 No. Only the West uses CCP as propaganda term. The CPC would not call themselves CCP, it would be like USA calling themselves American United States (AUS).

    • @G.A.C_Preserve
      @G.A.C_Preserve Рік тому

      Its official acronym is the CCP before it changed to CPC for propaganda purposes as the CPC acronym doesn't have as much bad associated with it unlike the CCP

    • @walden6272
      @walden6272 Рік тому

      @@G.A.C_Preserve Wrong. That would make zero sense for the party to be called Chinese Communist Party because they are already Chinese. That's like the Republican Party calling itself American Republican Party or the Democratic Party calling itself American Democratic Party. Both Parties are of the United States, just as the Communist Party of China. Even, the United States once had a Communist Party. It would be proper to be refer to as Communist Party of United States. No one called them American Communist Party.

    • @jieling4988
      @jieling4988 9 місяців тому +3

      西方把中共称为ccp 是为了让人联想到苏共cccp 从第一印象开始就对它产生恐惧

  • @tingxiao5137
    @tingxiao5137 4 місяці тому +25

    告訴你們一些毛澤東的趣事
    毛澤東不喜歡錢
    毛澤東不喜歡使用任何武器
    毛澤東喜歡寫詩
    毛澤東看悲慘話劇會哭
    毛澤東喜歡吃辣椒
    最後,你們不是中國大陸人,永遠也不會讀懂他。
    永遠不會懂他晚年時為什麼讀到一首古詩時會痛哭 (六朝何事,只成門戶私計?)

    • @egay86292
      @egay86292 Місяць тому

      people like Gerorge Bush Senior, who only have to show up at the table to get fed, frequently "don't like money." in 92 years i have never met a peasant who did not love money dearly, vecause they knew its power.

    • @tingxiao5137
      @tingxiao5137 Місяць тому

      @@egay86292 那我還告訴你一些他的事,他死後,把所有的遺產留給了國家.(他寫過很多書,書的稿費)沒有給自己的女兒.
      他的遺產裡沒有房產,所有也沒有給女兒在中國留下房產.
      他住在北京的地方是給房租的,從他的稿費裡給.租住的住所裡基本上只有各種書.他70歲了還穿著破舊的睡衣.有很多人送過他私人禮物,其中有一朋友送他的禮物是中國古代最有名的詩人李白的字畫.價值相當於蒙娜麗莎.他都轉交給了中國博物館.

    • @joshlewis575
      @joshlewis575 6 днів тому +1

      "Cry when watching a tragic drama "😂😂 he slept like a baby and she'd not a tear for the millions he starved. Dude was as horrible as people come

  • @Coco-uq5uf
    @Coco-uq5uf 11 місяців тому

    I’m so inlove with this channel.
    Wish there’s a video on the Cold War too😢

  • @alanc7728
    @alanc7728 7 місяців тому

    Thanks for the history lesson, Mr. Travolta!

  • @aze94
    @aze94 Рік тому +6

    That last line on the young marshal at the end, haha!

  • @CyberPanda-yl1db
    @CyberPanda-yl1db Рік тому +6

    This history explains why China has always sided with southern countries in resisting imperialist colonialism, because China empathizes with their experiences.

  • @kooroo5847
    @kooroo5847 Рік тому +20

    As a Chinese, I am very happy that you can explain this history without any political position, I like your video, it is the most correct video about China that I have seen on UA-cam

  • @haoguzhang2
    @haoguzhang2 Рік тому +1

    One correction: Qing dynasty 1644 - 1911. Nice video!

  • @zainmudassir2964
    @zainmudassir2964 Рік тому +17

    Hope you cover Afghanistan civil war in 1920s and rise of King Zahir Shah who would lead most prosperous time in the country's history. Sad how things turned so bad which still being felt today.

  • @josephwu3136
    @josephwu3136 Рік тому +165

    My grandpa Wu Wei from Taishan Guangdong Province, born 1921 was part of the PLA and served in the war against Japanese occupation, chinas civil war against the KMT, and later went on to serve in the 27th company of the people’s volunteers army in the war of aiding Korea against American aggression. Glory to the motherland. 🇨🇳✊🏼💪🏼
    Glory to the patriots, liberators, revolutionaries and workers of the world! Long live the revolution! May the revolutionary spirit of Mao Zedong live on forever!

    • @stxfdt1240
      @stxfdt1240 Рік тому +2

      Hat

    • @treystewart731
      @treystewart731 Рік тому

      American aggression? The whole reason we went into Korea was because of North Korea's aggression against the South. South Korea is a thriving democracy with one of the best economies in the world, whereas North Korea is a poverty-stricken Communist hellhole ruled by a despot.

    • @ttbr7687
      @ttbr7687 Рік тому

      Based

    • @Wolf_Larsen
      @Wolf_Larsen Рік тому

      Have some bugspray, chinksect
      动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门

    • @IrrationalCharm
      @IrrationalCharm 8 місяців тому +6

      Taiwan best China

  • @starerror
    @starerror 7 місяців тому +3

    The producers of the video simply don't understand that an army in such dire straits and short of numbers would have been finished long ago if it had not been for the voluntary support and help of the local people during the Long March, but rather for the so-called coercion and blackmail.

    • @wxhqyfpy
      @wxhqyfpy Місяць тому

      In the base areas, the Red Army had the support of the local people. On the Long March, there was actually no support from the local people.

  • @SteelyBud
    @SteelyBud Рік тому +4

    Great work as usual. Just be careful with those adjectives, Jesse.

  • @ArvoSvensson
    @ArvoSvensson 7 місяців тому

    Professional and detailed.

  • @FranklinChow
    @FranklinChow Рік тому +2

    Even the best LOL player could not perform "四渡赤水" magic move.

  • @drzen7703
    @drzen7703 Рік тому +235

    Mao is The legend. The great leader, One of the top level grand strategist of all time. Look at what he had at the begining, he was a middle school tutor, he led a bunch of uprising farmers, his enemy discribe him as mountain bandit . And now, his portrait is in second largest country's currency. His teaching spread from china to japan , cuba, latin america and africa. His former enemies keep spreading insult rumor about him even he is dead for decades. Western power are so afraid of him that western media demonize him into tyrant and butcher . But history will never end. The more infamous Mao's name in western media , the more proof that maoism is a terrifying weapon against colonialism .

    • @osjjsm4364
      @osjjsm4364 Рік тому +13

      Too bad he became a dictator

    • @edd-600
      @edd-600 Рік тому +46

      @@osjjsm4364 I am Chinese and I am telling you, he is not a dictator, you know too little about modern Chinese history

    • @AoikeKara
      @AoikeKara Рік тому +21

      ​@@osjjsm4364 He was a dictator and not a dictator; he alone decided and promoted the misguided tragedy of the Cultural Revolution, but these actions were not intended to secure his power and position.

    • @joshzhang7041
      @joshzhang7041 Рік тому +3

      @@osjjsm4364 He was certainly flawed ad did betray some of his own principles in the end

    • @drzen7703
      @drzen7703 Рік тому +13

      ​@@osjjsm4364 What makes you think dictator must be bad . Are you sure your critical thinking skill is not being turned off when talking about certain topics? I think you may have been affected by some kind of political propaganda.

  • @allenschwarz6795
    @allenschwarz6795 Рік тому +13

    Okay, now I am desperate to know if that last bit about the Young Marshall is real or just some jacked up propaganda.

    • @zainmudassir2964
      @zainmudassir2964 Рік тому

      I just know he was opium addict for some time until his father,the Old Marshal was assassinated by the Japanese

    • @tylerbozinovski427
      @tylerbozinovski427 Рік тому +5

      No, it's real.

  • @zijianxiong9356
    @zijianxiong9356 Рік тому +8

    A small mistake at 11:25, it's "Hebei" province rather than "Hubei" province. "Hubei" is another province in which Wuhan is located.

  • @amotaba
    @amotaba Рік тому

    Excellent video

  • @pengmike4219
    @pengmike4219 Місяць тому +1

    The name of Red Army Commander on the photo at 8:42 is wrong, it shold be Zhu De (head of Red Army) instead of Zhou EnLai.

  • @watchman835
    @watchman835 Рік тому +12

    0:04 I was that little boy marching alone with the army.

  • @weiliu3512
    @weiliu3512 Рік тому +7

    found two mistakes. 1, Qing dynasty ruled China less than 300 year; 2, Chiang studied military in Japan not Moscow

    • @李卓群
      @李卓群 7 місяців тому

      Japan? you are kidding me

    • @NuiJagaa
      @NuiJagaa 5 місяців тому +1

      @@李卓群It's true. Chiang studied warfare at the Tokyo Shinbu Gakko, a preparatory school for the Imperial Japanese Army Academny, which was intended for Chinese students. It was there that he was introduced to revolutionary anti-Qing nationalism.
      In fact, Chiang served in the IJA after graduating, and did so from 1909 to 1911. He only returned to China to join the Wuchang uprising.
      He wouldn't study in Moscow until 1923.

    • @akira4578
      @akira4578 2 місяці тому

      @@李卓群 蒋介石他有个日本名字叫做石田介雄,但是他确实也被国民党派去苏联学习过,就是为什么当年他发动大清洗后苏联还会叫共产党别抵抗,当年解放军南下的时候,苏联人可是跟着蒋介石跑的

  • @上帝最腐败
    @上帝最腐败 Рік тому +38

    As a Chinese. I think what you say is objective and true.
    I've seen a lot of videos that are biased and not objective.
    Your video surprised me. You're a true history teller.👍

    • @王方悦
      @王方悦 Рік тому +4

      Even this one is not 100% objective, maybe because the maker doesn't have full insight of the ccp history, especially during the long march.
      But you are right, this is already the most objective one on UA-cam

    • @haoyangsun3278
      @haoyangsun3278 Рік тому +1

      How do you define objective? I guess history is objective to you if it's the same as what you were taught as a kid by ccp?😂

    • @xinlugong-wv5yy
      @xinlugong-wv5yy Рік тому +3

      @@haoyangsun3278 well, the description with the idea of neoliberalism is not objective either,right?

    • @上帝最腐败
      @上帝最腐败 Рік тому +1

      @@haoyangsun3278 I'm just saying that what he said was objective. There's no problem with that. It is not a question of who should educate. History is so objective. No matter how many people betray history, forget the truth, deceive themselves. What he said was objective.

    • @LC-es8jx
      @LC-es8jx Рік тому +3

      @@haoyangsun3278 How do you define objective? I guess history is not objective to you if it's not same as what you want to hear. 🤣

  • @张安康-u5z
    @张安康-u5z 2 місяці тому +1

    My grandfather joined PLA in the young age and liberate Shandong province and the capital city Nanjing. He was a signal corp in army. My grandpa joined the large support teams which were consisted by peasants, helped the PLA wined the Huaihai battle.

  • @RI_Carl
    @RI_Carl Рік тому +1

    a little mistake in 11:15, the red region is Hebei instead of Hubei. Hubei is another province in the middle of China

  • @上帝最腐败
    @上帝最腐败 Рік тому +8

    This is why China became a socialist country after a brief capitalist society. China's capitalist regime fled to Taiwan Province of China.
    The contradiction between the Chinese Communist Party and the Republic of China has not yet been resolved.
    This is Taiwan question.This is the contradiction between the Chinese Communist Party and the Republic of China.
    China is still in civil war.

    • @ThisNinjaSays_
      @ThisNinjaSays_ Рік тому

      China and most civilizations which traded goods were always capitalist. Chinese Tang Dynasty was perhaps the most successful open capitalist Dynasty from China.
      Visit any bazaar in Iran or India and you'll know.
      Marx and Engels' ideology is a product of the European Industrial Revolution. Communism is the new ideology. IT'S premise was so appealing because the world was faced with deadly American and British capitalists who had no regard for human life or suffering.
      The Germans and Nordic countries incorporated Communism into their Democratic social welfare systems.
      The British into their labour market.
      Lenin and Mao went all out of course 😀.

    • @TheExtraterrestrial99
      @TheExtraterrestrial99 Рік тому +1

      Well, technically Chinese civir war is still on going, there is never signed agreement or treaty, both side just ceased fire.

  • @BlackMasterRoshi
    @BlackMasterRoshi Рік тому +5

    For a more in-depth look at the warlord era, I recommend the beautifully illustrated manga Fist of the Blue Sky.

  • @ollieyang4613
    @ollieyang4613 Рік тому +41

    dude, you mixed up Hubei Province with Hebei Province, and also used the modern PRC version of the map, wtf.
    the guy you labeled as Zhou Enlai at 8:37 is actually Zhu De, once again, wtf.

    • @josephwu3136
      @josephwu3136 Рік тому

      White people doing Chinese history. Did you expect any more?

    • @kanestalin7246
      @kanestalin7246 Рік тому +4

      I was about to say that guy looks nothing like Zhou Enlai

    • @ThisNinjaSays_
      @ThisNinjaSays_ Рік тому

      You can correct him, no need to mad bro.
      Most people here know Mr Zhou's eyebrows 😜

  • @DisconnectHack
    @DisconnectHack Місяць тому

    He’s rolled five thousand years of Chinese wisdom into one kamehamema. No body was prepared for that.

  • @venturatheace1
    @venturatheace1 Рік тому +3

    22:56 doesn’t the guy bald guy on the right resemble Yamashita?