I remember when the YC-14 had its first flight. Seattle knew that it would happen soon: the bird had completed its high speed taxi testing and the weather was perfect. When it was spotted on the runway at Boeing Field, much of the traffic on Interstate 5 pulled off onto the shoulder to watch (I was one of a mile long linear parking lot with a great view of the field). The first flight is relatively short, so the fuel load is minimal and the wing is lightly loaded. It used only a fraction of the runway and climbed out at a very steep angle; it was beautiful! (a retired Boeing engineer)
And another romanian Anastase Dragomir (1896-1966) was a distinguished Romanian inventor, most famous for his "catapultable cockpit" patent (with Tănase Dobrescu) as an early form of ejection seat, although preceded by Everard Calthrop's 1916 compressed air ejection seat, and others.
Soviet aviation is so interesting, because its design is quite different. Information is so rare, there is always a plane nobody knows, making it even more mysterious and fascinating!
Undoubtedly great designs, virtually handbuilt & with no economies of scale = tiny fleets with spare parts and training issues. The engines were and still are the achillies heel of soviet & RF aircraft.
@@Vladimirthetiny No economies of scale in nearly 200 aircraft in 5 years, on plants that were at capacity? How many commercial aircraft do you think are built??
The AN72 us almost identical to the XC14 developed at the samme time nu the USA. Thw Soviet Union up tp their usual tricks copy and spying and stealing!
The original An-72 was probably the greatest loss, as it was more or less fully developed and could have been retained as a variant. Instead of having a mediocre commercial airliner, a great STOL would have been really good and filled the niche better.
Definitely a damned interesting aircraft with some even more interesting special applications and modifications. I really like the aircraft that were made to fill small niches like the An-72, DHC7 and DHC-6. You should do a video on the DHC-7.
Your content is always interesting! Keep it up! A very minor correction: Besides the "C" for cargo in the naming convention, the number of syllables also is defined. One indicates a prop plane. Two indicates a jet.
The AN-72/74 series may be really useful on the gravel runways and subzero temps of the Canadian arctic, as the old DC-3 and 737-200 planes now being used are running out of spare parts.
The Americans _almost_ got there first with the Boeing YC-14, which was going to into production to replace the C-130 by 1980. But the USAF in 1978 re-assessed its transport needs and found out what they _really_ needed was a replacement for the overworked C-141. The result: the C-17 _Globemaster III_ , which the USAF ended up buying 222 planes.
Planes like An-72 with engines installed above the wings are uniquely nuanced of its kind. The Coanda effect helps increase lift force of the wings in turn reduces takeoff distance
@Darren_Xero; The YC-14 from Boeing had this engine placement, some decades ago, and it had excellent STOL capability, but was taken out by USA politics...
@rustyjeep2469 Yeah I am no fan of the lefty social justice crap pushed for so long but I'm afraid of the pendulum swinging too far the other way. There have been quite a few women who were integral to major flight projects and discoveries.
When I lived in Vietnam I remember seeing two An-72s on the ramp in Saigon. I don’t think they were Vietnamese military but there were several Russian oil companies down in the area. Very unique airplane to see when taxiing by.
Vietnam didn't operate an72 and I haven't seen it , wonder which year you see it ? And yup the Soviet have a join venture with Vietnam for oil exploration in SCS ( later the Russian replace Soviet ) fun fact only Russian dare to drill oil with Vietnam in SCS , Spanish and american company all Fleed once the Chinese put pressure
@@ATLOffroad probably just a visit , an74 are super rare , an124 and il76 are hella more common as they transport cargo and stuff from time to time into Vietnam
Henri Coandă’s contributions didn’t stop with the jet engine concept; his name lives on in the Coandă effect, which remains fundamental to both science and engineering today. Truly a visionary ahead of his time!
You didn't mention that the Russians plan to suppliment the Il-112V by replacing the turboprops with PD-8 jet engines and the plan is to mount said jet engines above the wing similar to the arrangement on the An-72. Eventually the engines for the Il-112V will allow a turboprop version, but the Il-212 version could replace the An-72s in service while the Il-112V will replace the other lighter propeller driven Antonovs. I also wonder if experience of putting the engines above the wings on the Il-212 might lead to them doing the same with the Il-276 as that would reduce the risk of FOD too for rough field operations.
I originally thought the engines were up high over the wing, so they didn't have to worry about them ingesting any Debrie from runway, I see it is only an added bonus and thank you for sharing videos. I love airplanes.
Thanks for a really enlightening video! I didn't realize that liquid running down a vessel instead of simply pouring was due to the Coanda Effect. As an American, I had dismissed the An-72 as a cheap copy of the YC-14. Obviously, it was far more successful and it's sad that it didn't achieve even more success. Thanks again!
Such a neat aircraft. Go anywhere machine. Watched videos of it doing polar flights to Barneo Base landing on snow pack. Very nicely done short documentary.
This is another great video about another strange Soviet plane. Keep'em coming. BTW: I'm interested in some jet powered passenger float planes. They had the same high mounted engines & a distinctly Soviet look.
Great video sir. I have always loved the AH-72. Over the years I've heard of a variant the 76 as a board patrol aircraft with rearward facing guns mounted in the wings and sold to Iran?. Thank you for your video.
Had no idea, thanks! Can't wait to visit there again. Def explains why there was a Cheburashka giveaway at a Japanese convenience store here in Beijing not too long ago~ @@freeculture
@@davedixon2068 Boeing YC-14 First flight 9 August 1976 An-72 First flight 31 August 1977 It is impossible to copy in a year. Especially without the original.
It's not just unexpected lift changes which can occur from an engine arrangement like this, but also moment (torque). So in some ways it's probably good that the Coanda effect was minimal in the production versions... though as noted the design ends up being closer in specs to ordinary though still saddled with harder to service engines.
Excellent Coanda examples. I actually never realised it also literaly applies to fluids. I would simply have called that adhesion. But that is after all what the Coanda effects is also about, isn’t it?
Air is sticky, the simplest explanation of the Coanda effect, a phrase that caused one of my instructors to roundly insult me. When a fluid is moving, say air, it sticks to a surface in its movement. And this one aspect of the Coanda effect makes for more interesting Coanda ducts, of which there are many kinds, including one duct that will reverse itself. If a Coanda duct is used for grit blasting, not only does it do a better job than a simple nozzle, but eats ceramic like crazy. I couldn't get one crafted of tungsten carbide, which would have lasted a lot longer. Boss told me to scrap the nozzle because it was a waste. Sure blasted pretty good, though, but went through grit like crazy, it blasted so much. Too bad this would have been the C14, had Boeing gotten the contract. The Soviets couldn't've afforded to design this and build the proof of concept and prototype, but after Boeing worked most of the kinks of concept and design, and I can't say more than that because everyone is gonna think I'm saying bad things about Soviet acquisition of useful information. Regardless of how design data for the Coaler, Antonov did a pretty good job on this, and helped explain why the USAF didn't want it. But the Soviets kept it and continued developing it.
Why not go for a low wing configuration when the engines are on top of the wing? This would save structural reinforcement for the high wing and therefore weight.
Seattle’s museum of flight might have the American version sitting outside with other large aircrafts. American military didn’t think there were no benefits building a small transport plane. But I could be wrong. President Carter cur many projects…
They decided anything that couldn't be done with helicopters could be done with C-130s, an anything that couldn't be done by them could be done by C-17s. etc. etc. up to C-5s.
I love the yc14. and since the an72/74 was actually produced I really like them. but the og 72 is the real deal. the later models just miss the whole intended concept
It is sad what happened to industry in Ukraine, and Antonov is perfect example. Even before war, politics cut it from main customers in Russia, and West was never interested for advanced products from Ukraine.
Bristol aircraft proposed such a design in the 1950's. In the 60's i assume there was some disaffected UK designers that went to the US, hence Boeing YC14.
Okay I know this isn't the point of the video but does anyone else have a kettle that only shuts off when boiling when the lid is down if you leave the lid open does it continue boiling
The typical fate of a "Jack of all trades, master of none" project. All looks very appealing on paper... until the lads with the hands on the purse strings realize that a bunch of "one-trick ponies" are ultimately more economic.
The teapot over your marble work top gave me PTSD. I've got that worktop and you only have to look at it and it'll stain. Then the wife finds out about it...
@@freeculture 100%, and it's one of those things you find out after spending £££ on it. So not only is it an expensive way to find out, but you're then stuck with it for years because you want to at least get some value out of it.
@ I didn’t say it was a Russian company. But it was Russia/the Soviet union that ordered the plane made. It wasn’t Ukraine that ordered the plane made.
I still find the "International" pronunciation of Soviet Bauru's anagram grating. I think of them in the American pronunciations, as "A N" instead of "Aun" or "S U" instead of "Suuu".
I find the US separated letters pronunciation dumb and irritating. Just said the letter together ffs. You ain't saying EN EI ES EI, you say NASA. For worse Su isn't an anagram, it's from Sukhoi. So SU (SOO). Also English butchers the word since it isn't KH, it's a latin J СУХОИ, S U J O I. The J like in Spanish, so you pronounce it like the English H, HOY Soo Hoy. An is not A N, it is Antonov, so AN.
@@BARRACUDA009 Soviet and Ukrainian, then Ukrainian. Russia is not the successor to the USSR, the Russian SFSR was part of the the USSR and housed the capital. It's the same as saying that Brew Dog would be English if the UK dissolved into it's constituent countries, which is nonsense.
lol he said over time in the Soviet Union the more traditional fell out in favor of the second design with engines on top. Um you mean they finally saw Boeings and copied it??? They clearly didn’t dream it up it was Boeing
I remember when the YC-14 had its first flight. Seattle knew that it would happen soon: the bird had completed its high speed taxi testing and the weather was perfect. When it was spotted on the runway at Boeing Field, much of the traffic on Interstate 5 pulled off onto the shoulder to watch (I was one of a mile long linear parking lot with a great view of the field). The first flight is relatively short, so the fuel load is minimal and the wing is lightly loaded. It used only a fraction of the runway and climbed out at a very steep angle; it was beautiful!
(a retired Boeing engineer)
Fun fact , the Coandă effect gets its name from Henri Coandă, a Romanian Engineer who contributed to the creation of the jet engine.
Yeah 😅 he had some interesting ideas that's for sure
@@CraigLandsberg-lk1ep :))
And another romanian Anastase Dragomir (1896-1966) was a distinguished Romanian inventor, most famous for his "catapultable cockpit" patent (with Tănase Dobrescu) as an early form of ejection seat, although preceded by Everard Calthrop's 1916 compressed air ejection seat, and others.
Soviet aviation is so interesting, because its design is quite different. Information is so rare, there is always a plane nobody knows, making it even more mysterious and fascinating!
Undoubtedly great designs, virtually handbuilt & with no economies of scale = tiny fleets with spare parts and training issues. The engines were and still are the achillies heel of soviet & RF aircraft.
@@Vladimirthetiny No economies of scale in nearly 200 aircraft in 5 years, on plants that were at capacity? How many commercial aircraft do you think are built??
And at the exact same time, developing planes that look exactly like American planes. Weird.
@@vicariousjohnson9823 man, the aerodynamics laws are the same no matter the country, imagine that
The AN72 us almost identical to the XC14 developed at the samme time nu the USA. Thw Soviet Union up tp their usual tricks copy and spying and stealing!
I think the An-72 is a really good-looking plane.
I always liked its derpy practical look.
like your first cougar, this aircraft is unforgettable
The original An-72 was probably the greatest loss, as it was more or less fully developed and could have been retained as a variant. Instead of having a mediocre commercial airliner, a great STOL would have been really good and filled the niche better.
Just when almost all Soviet plane seems to be covered in your videos...
I mean, I think he was born Soviet... Or was it Paper Skies...
@@senioravocado1864 there is a Russian version of this channel, so…
@Cyber_kumo there is?!
@@senioravocado1864it’s called skyship ENG for a reason hhhhhh
……it turns out there are MANY more!
Definitely a damned interesting aircraft with some even more interesting special applications and modifications. I really like the aircraft that were made to fill small niches like the An-72, DHC7 and DHC-6. You should do a video on the DHC-7.
Yes, more DHC airplanes please! Caribou and Twin Otter if possible.
great one
The layout came back with the Be-200, another, even more unusual aircraft.
Your content is always interesting! Keep it up! A very minor correction: Besides the "C" for cargo in the naming convention, the number of syllables also is defined. One indicates a prop plane. Two indicates a jet.
hope to see video about IL 76
The AN-72/74 series may be really useful on the gravel runways and subzero temps of the Canadian arctic, as the old DC-3 and 737-200 planes now being used are running out of spare parts.
Your videos are very good. They are unbiased, and provide interesting insights into the many aspects of aviation design.
The Americans _almost_ got there first with the Boeing YC-14, which was going to into production to replace the C-130 by 1980. But the USAF in 1978 re-assessed its transport needs and found out what they _really_ needed was a replacement for the overworked C-141. The result: the C-17 _Globemaster III_ , which the USAF ended up buying 222 planes.
Planes like An-72 with engines installed above the wings are uniquely nuanced of its kind. The Coanda effect helps increase lift force of the wings in turn reduces takeoff distance
@Darren_Xero;
The YC-14 from Boeing had this engine placement, some decades ago, and it had excellent STOL capability, but was taken out by USA politics...
Yes thank you for literally saying the exact same thing he said in the video...
Takie cuda w 10:26 wjeżdza T4 a na pokładzie Nysa 502 ;-) Super materiał !
Thanks!
AN-72p
ua-cam.com/video/El7iVkGF3yg/v-deo.htmlsi=Q_h3Tr2Bq0L_22JB&t=19
Your content is always interesting!
Was so glad to see this video 😅 been looking for coverage of this aircraft for over a decade, thanks to the Author 💙
Ah, Cheburshka! Always good to see a vid about this aircraft. Thanks!
Another advantage of having the engines so high up, is you can operate from remote unprepared airstrips with less risk of FOD’ing the engines.
I saw one flying as an engine testbed over Monina when I was visiting the Central Airforce Museum of the Soviet Union, December 2017.😊
Another excellent video.
"yes ladies your Dyson included" The 1 lady that randomly clicked the video "ohhhhh"
there's a lot more women in aviation than you seem to be aware of 😒
@rustyjeep2469
Yeah I am no fan of the lefty social justice crap pushed for so long but I'm afraid of the pendulum swinging too far the other way. There have been quite a few women who were integral to major flight projects and discoveries.
Do none of you people vacuum? What do vaginas have to do with it. Stupid.
Good video except for that.
@@rustyjeep2469 Under 1% though, i.e. practically nonexistent. And we don't talk about pilots here we talk about aerospace engineers.
Thanks for this episode. I love this plane. Now I would like to see the Il-76 and the Il-476 with the new engines. That would be great.
When I lived in Vietnam I remember seeing two An-72s on the ramp in Saigon. I don’t think they were Vietnamese military but there were several Russian oil companies down in the area. Very unique airplane to see when taxiing by.
Vietnam didn't operate an72 and I haven't seen it , wonder which year you see it ? And yup the Soviet have a join venture with Vietnam for oil exploration in SCS ( later the Russian replace Soviet ) fun fact only Russian dare to drill oil with Vietnam in SCS , Spanish and american company all Fleed once the Chinese put pressure
@ I lived there from 2010-2013 as a contract airline pilot.
@@ATLOffroad probably just a visit , an74 are super rare , an124 and il76 are hella more common as they transport cargo and stuff from time to time into Vietnam
Henri Coandă’s contributions didn’t stop with the jet engine concept; his name lives on in the Coandă effect, which remains fundamental to both science and engineering today. Truly a visionary ahead of his time!
You didn't mention that the Russians plan to suppliment the Il-112V by replacing the turboprops with PD-8 jet engines and the plan is to mount said jet engines above the wing similar to the arrangement on the An-72. Eventually the engines for the Il-112V will allow a turboprop version, but the Il-212 version could replace the An-72s in service while the Il-112V will replace the other lighter propeller driven Antonovs. I also wonder if experience of putting the engines above the wings on the Il-212 might lead to them doing the same with the Il-276 as that would reduce the risk of FOD too for rough field operations.
I originally thought the engines were up high over the wing, so they didn't have to worry about them ingesting any Debrie from runway, I see it is only an added bonus and thank you for sharing videos. I love airplanes.
Thanks for a really enlightening video! I didn't realize that liquid running down a vessel instead of simply pouring was due to the Coanda Effect.
As an American, I had dismissed the An-72 as a cheap copy of the YC-14. Obviously, it was far more successful and it's sad that it didn't achieve even more success.
Thanks again!
Not a copy but inspired by. The Soviets at this time were very much into; "anything you can do we can do better".
@@obsidianjane4413 Well put.
I don't know what's more interesting, the AN-72, the Coanda effect or the video itself
The awacs version of this plane is even stranger
This is a beautiful plane. I found it in an old book on aircraft once. I loved it when I saw it.
Such a neat aircraft. Go anywhere machine. Watched videos of it doing polar flights to Barneo Base landing on snow pack. Very nicely done short documentary.
Upper surface Blowing 😊
I remeber this design being pushed heavily at the Farnborough and Paris Airshows for a number of years and was always in the displays.
Total of 195 Antonov An-72 and An-74 aircraft have been built.
Excellent presentation. I've always been interested in it's background, especially since one crashed in Russia a few years ago.
This is another great video about another strange Soviet plane. Keep'em coming.
BTW: I'm interested in some jet powered passenger float planes. They had the same high mounted engines & a distinctly Soviet look.
0:43 That smokey piston engined C-123 ❤ Same engine as they used in the P-47 Thunderbolt and F6 Hellcat.
Great video sir. I have always loved the AH-72. Over the years I've heard of a variant the 76 as a board patrol aircraft with rearward facing guns mounted in the wings and sold to Iran?. Thank you for your video.
Military aviation leads in innovation.
Free from profit and cost demands.
The high placement negates a lot of debris potentially entering the intakes on those short unpaved runways.
Great amphibian that would make
The cutest ! Finaly ! Thx ! 😊
Used on the Paris Dakar..lands any time anywhere on the desert.. one of the toughest planes out there....
Love the Cheburashka reference!
Fun fact: Cheburashka is still a thing in Japan (lots of merchandise) crazy nuts 🙂
Had no idea, thanks! Can't wait to visit there again. Def explains why there was a Cheburashka giveaway at a Japanese convenience store here in Beijing not too long ago~ @@freeculture
So… the Soviet clone of the YC-14?
NOPE
This would be a revolutionary design if it wasn't a copy of the Boeing YC-14.
But they separately solved all the problems of getting it into production.
@@obsidianjane4413 you sure about that
@@davedixon2068
Boeing YC-14 First flight 9 August 1976
An-72 First flight 31 August 1977
It is impossible to copy in a year. Especially without the original.
@@Serg-qr5my who says they were only getting information for a year? its called industrial espionage it is continuous
An-72 began to be developed in 1973, independently of Boeing.
They should have made it a sea jet
An 72 has a descendant half a century after.
i saw these unique birds in spain island, las palamas air ports in the 1990s, i haven't see any for long time
It's not just unexpected lift changes which can occur from an engine arrangement like this, but also moment (torque). So in some ways it's probably good that the Coanda effect was minimal in the production versions... though as noted the design ends up being closer in specs to ordinary though still saddled with harder to service engines.
Excellent Coanda examples. I actually never realised it also literaly applies to fluids. I would simply have called that adhesion. But that is after all what the Coanda effects is also about, isn’t it?
Cool plane, got to see it at the Kiev Aviation Museum. I had 1 flight on the AN-26 to Simferopol, very slow.
I first learned about the An-72 Coaler in "F-15 Strike Eagle", and shot down lots of them lol.
Air is sticky, the simplest explanation of the Coanda effect, a phrase that caused one of my instructors to roundly insult me. When a fluid is moving, say air, it sticks to a surface in its movement.
And this one aspect of the Coanda effect makes for more interesting Coanda ducts, of which there are many kinds, including one duct that will reverse itself.
If a Coanda duct is used for grit blasting, not only does it do a better job than a simple nozzle, but eats ceramic like crazy. I couldn't get one crafted of tungsten carbide, which would have lasted a lot longer. Boss told me to scrap the nozzle because it was a waste.
Sure blasted pretty good, though, but went through grit like crazy, it blasted so much.
Too bad this would have been the C14, had Boeing gotten the contract. The Soviets couldn't've afforded to design this and build the proof of concept and prototype, but after Boeing worked most of the kinks of concept and design, and I can't say more than that because everyone is gonna think I'm saying bad things about Soviet acquisition of useful information.
Regardless of how design data for the Coaler, Antonov did a pretty good job on this, and helped explain why the USAF didn't want it.
But the Soviets kept it and continued developing it.
A marvelous aircraft IMO.
Merci pour votre vidéo 😊❤
Why not go for a low wing configuration when the engines are on top of the wing? This would save structural reinforcement for the high wing and therefore weight.
Beautiful airplane.
Sky… in aviation history the biggest words are “what if” lol😅
Yep, what if the American air carriers had bought concorde
You pronounce A and N separately, not as "an".
An-72 Anableps. Sweet. cheers! / CS
Anyday where a favorite airplane gets its own video is a good day.
A new SkyEng video, nice.
A clever machine.
The Beriev-2 is also a weirdly cute plane.
Seen these up close in YQX, Gander, Newfoundland.
It was a cut-rate ripoff of the Boeing YC-14.
For you westernes everything is a Bad copy of your products 😂 just wake up man
Seattle’s museum of flight might have the American version sitting outside with other large aircrafts.
American military didn’t think there were no benefits building a small transport plane. But I could be wrong. President Carter cur many projects…
They decided anything that couldn't be done with helicopters could be done with C-130s, an anything that couldn't be done by them could be done by C-17s. etc. etc. up to C-5s.
I love the yc14. and since the an72/74 was actually produced I really like them. but the og 72 is the real deal. the later models just miss the whole intended concept
And all this time I thought it was to prevent debris to enter the engines. Make a video on the BE-200
I flew on AN-72s in Afghanistan. It looked like the wings were being burnt off by the engines.
I love the way this looks
1:45 That only happens with Communist tea. American coffee doesn't do that.
It is sad what happened to industry in Ukraine, and Antonov is perfect example. Even before war, politics cut it from main customers in Russia, and West was never interested for advanced products from Ukraine.
After the "change of government" in 2014 they only delivered 4 new aircraft, none since 2016.
This use of engines blowing over the top of the wings could be usefull in water/seaplanes. It seems that it was also used on Ekranoplanes.
NASA was flying one back in 1994. STOL engine exhaust over wing to enhance lift. Too bad I can't post a photo.
Bristol aircraft proposed such a design in the 1950's. In the 60's i assume there was some disaffected UK designers that went to the US, hence Boeing YC14.
It's literally a copy of the Boeing YC
15:55 Oh look, it's MacReady!
It was a design stolen from Boeing. My father was the chief areodynamicist advisor on it. I saw the plane when I was 13.
Was there a flying boat option? (because the high engine placement is good for water landings.
Okay I know this isn't the point of the video but does anyone else have a kettle that only shuts off when boiling when the lid is down if you leave the lid open does it continue boiling
The typical fate of a "Jack of all trades, master of none" project. All looks very appealing on paper... until the lads with the hands on the purse strings realize that a bunch of "one-trick ponies" are ultimately more economic.
The teapot over your marble work top gave me PTSD. I've got that worktop and you only have to look at it and it'll stain. Then the wife finds out about it...
yeah marble sucks, granite is far better for tops.
@@freeculture 100%, and it's one of those things you find out after spending £££ on it. So not only is it an expensive way to find out, but you're then stuck with it for years because you want to at least get some value out of it.
guess the nearest plane to this currently flying is the Embraer C-390. A good replacement for slow Hercules aircraft
Both the American and Russian versions of this type of plane is very cool. I a soft spot for prop planes. ✌️
Antonov is Ukrainian not Russian
@ I didn’t say it was a Russian company. But it was Russia/the Soviet union that ordered the plane made. It wasn’t Ukraine that ordered the plane made.
We need more content about soviet civilian aircraft, is the creator considering re making previous videos like Tu 154?
I still find the "International" pronunciation of Soviet Bauru's anagram grating. I think of them in the American pronunciations, as "A N" instead of "Aun" or "S U" instead of "Suuu".
I find the US separated letters pronunciation dumb and irritating.
Just said the letter together ffs. You ain't saying EN EI ES EI, you say NASA.
For worse Su isn't an anagram, it's from Sukhoi. So SU (SOO). Also English butchers the word since it isn't KH, it's a latin J СУХОИ, S U J O I. The J like in Spanish, so you pronounce it like the English H, HOY Soo Hoy.
An is not A N, it is Antonov, so AN.
This is the Russian version of the Boeing YC-14.
Ukrainian not Russian.
@@Adrian-GBM Soviet, not Ukranian and then Russian because Russia is the successor of the USSR, but Ukrain is not.
@@BARRACUDA009never talk with that types of "historical experts". They have their own "correct" opinion. And reject any other opinions.
@BARRACUDA009 except Antonov is still owned and run in Ukraine by Ukrainians. So it WAS Soviet, it's now Ukrainian. This is not uncommon knowledge.
@@BARRACUDA009 Soviet and Ukrainian, then Ukrainian. Russia is not the successor to the USSR, the Russian SFSR was part of the the USSR and housed the capital. It's the same as saying that Brew Dog would be English if the UK dissolved into it's constituent countries, which is nonsense.
It appears, first impression, to fill a similar niche as the Embraer C-390. Curious how the two compare against one another.
Coanda Forever!
Fun, wondered in the past few months about engine configurations for planes and this tells me what would happen with some of my more wilder ideas.
Can you make a video about an-70
And I thought thet the " Coandă" effect only applies to spaghetti in the draining process.
Awesome video as always but dang that plane is ugly! lol
Just like the new Embraear but without the tech.
11:35 Better than fishbed.
An American equivalent would be the Boeing YC-14, which looks even goofier
lol he said over time in the Soviet Union the more traditional fell out in favor of the second design with engines on top. Um you mean they finally saw Boeings and copied it??? They clearly didn’t dream it up it was Boeing