Why is Bhārat Called India In English?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 чер 2024
  • HELP SUPPORT NAME EXPLAIN ON PATREON: / nameexplain
    TIKTOK: / nameexplain
    INSTAGRAM: / nameexplainyt
    FACEBOOK: / 248812236869988
    TWITTER: / nameexplainyt
    BOOK: bit.ly/originofnames
    MERCH: teespring.com/stores/name-exp...
    Thank you to all my Patrons for supporting the channel!
    SOURCES & FURTHER READING
    Names For India In Its Official Languages: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names...
    Official Languages Of India: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight...
    Languages Of India: www.berlitz.com/blog/indian-l...
    India’s Languages By Native Speakers: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
    India Etymology: www.etymonline.com/word/india
    Names For India: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names...
    15 Names Of India: / the-etymology-of-india
    Who Named Bharat As India?: coopwb.in/info/who-named-bhar...
    India Or Bharat?: www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/20...
    The Mughal Empire: www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religi...
    Music: Lotus by Kevin MacLeod
    Free download: filmmusic.io/song/5046-lotus
    Licensed under CC BY 4.0: filmmusic.io/standard-license

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @NameExplain
    @NameExplain  8 місяців тому +130

    What is India called in your language?

  • @shadowgodthegamer5738
    @shadowgodthegamer5738 8 місяців тому +792

    It is interesting how the persians defined the name "India" the same way the greeks defined the name "Persia"

    • @prywatne4733
      @prywatne4733 8 місяців тому +189

      ...Which is the same way the Romans defined the name "Greece"

    • @Thatturtlethatsaysmeanthings
      @Thatturtlethatsaysmeanthings 8 місяців тому +30

      What did India call thailand?

    • @Frogboyaidan
      @Frogboyaidan 8 місяців тому +5

      Yes

    • @CorwinAlexander
      @CorwinAlexander 8 місяців тому +10

      Burma/Myanmar is between India and Thailand

    • @TheOfficialDrovix
      @TheOfficialDrovix 8 місяців тому +60

      In Thai, Thailand is "ประเทศ ไทย" which looks like "Prathes Thiy" which also looks like "Pradesh Thai", and in India there are many "state land areas" labeled as "Pradesh"

  • @chandlervonhaght
    @chandlervonhaght 8 місяців тому +321

    In Sinhala, ancient India is referred to as "Dambadiva", which is derived from "Jambudveepa".

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому +34

      Jambudweep, the island of the citron tree. Lovely. This Sanskrit name embodies the Indian subcontinent and its distinct nature from the rest of the Asian continent.

    • @tegarz
      @tegarz 8 місяців тому +4

      Island of guava

    • @Ronex-jv6pc
      @Ronex-jv6pc 8 місяців тому +16

      ​@@tegarznot gauva... Jambu is a kind of blackberry Or indian plum...

    • @tegarz
      @tegarz 8 місяців тому +4

      @@Ronex-jv6pc yes I know, it is called duwet or jamblang in my region. Jambu in my language is water apple or rose apple, related to indian jambu, but also can be used to mention guava.

    • @Ronex-jv6pc
      @Ronex-jv6pc 8 місяців тому +3

      @@tegarz not possible... Guava came from South America.... It was introduced by portugese to us in 17th ce.

  • @Shrapnel82
    @Shrapnel82 8 місяців тому +329

    There's also the question of if English speakers will actually adopt the change, should it happen. If Germany insisted on being called "Deutschland", I doubt anyone would follow. It'd be the same as if Japan insisted on Nippon, or China on Zhongguo. Plenty of countries have names in their native language different from English, they just aren't used.

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +70

      True. Already Turkey changed its name to Turkie but that didn't really catch on lol

    • @tenacious3911
      @tenacious3911 8 місяців тому +59

      @@dwarasamudra8889 Especially as it uses a character that most English speakers can't type.

    • @rehurekj
      @rehurekj 8 місяців тому

      All this renaming and demand to use endonyms even in foreign languages seems to me a bit racist. as been pointed out if it was Germany everyone would laugh if the demanded Deutschland usage in English but when its those "poor brown ppl" who demand all world must use they native name( like Myanmar v Burma) white liberals with white saviour/ guilt complex suddenly jump the bandwagon and change their language in a second.

    • @flamencoprof
      @flamencoprof 8 місяців тому

      @@tenacious3911 It's not hard. Since I went mad on Flamenco, with all its terms like compás, peña, soleá, toná etc. I just keep a file called Special Characters on my desktop to copy/paste from. Other stuff as well: -
      á ã ç é ê í ï ó ôú ü ñ Á É Í Ó Ú Ñ ¿ ¡ £ … ⋮ √ « » Ω ™ © ℗ Degree sign ° ⸫

    • @Ggdivhjkjl
      @Ggdivhjkjl 8 місяців тому +14

      Swaziland tried it too.

  • @kc4276
    @kc4276 8 місяців тому +157

    Small correction: Bharat is not the ‘Hindi’ name, but the Vedic Sanskrit name.
    Hindi is a relatively young language, and to put things into perspective on a timeline, it would be like comparing Old Latin and Modern Italian or Spanish.

    • @sunnychoudhary3288
      @sunnychoudhary3288 8 місяців тому +5

      LOL yeah, Hindi Hindu Hindustan, all came from persionization of India

    • @sriharshacv7760
      @sriharshacv7760 8 місяців тому +2

      I generally like this video creator, but this one was a bit careless.

    • @teehee4096
      @teehee4096 8 місяців тому +14

      It is the Hindi name. It comes from Sanskrit, but it is used in Hindi and many other Indo-Aryan languages.

    • @cesaravegah3787
      @cesaravegah3787 8 місяців тому

      Thanks for the info, Interesting.

    • @0arjun077
      @0arjun077 8 місяців тому +13

      ​@@teehee4096well in Malayalam India is called Bharatam so it's not limited to North Indian Languages

  • @Jan_Koopman
    @Jan_Koopman 8 місяців тому +88

    Actually, "Indië" does not refer to India. The Dutch word for India is "India". The word "Indië" is the latter part of colonized Southeast Asian regions:
    Nederlands-Indië = Dutch Indies (Indonesia)
    Brits-Indië = British India (India)

    • @alfonsmelenhorst9672
      @alfonsmelenhorst9672 8 місяців тому +6

      But it is in the Dutch spoken in Belgium.

    • @Jan_Koopman
      @Jan_Koopman 8 місяців тому +2

      @@alfonsmelenhorst9672, I did not know that. Then again: the clarification was necessary

    • @ishanbajpai6940
      @ishanbajpai6940 8 місяців тому +6

      Inde is probably derived from India though.

    • @TheBakuganmaster99
      @TheBakuganmaster99 8 місяців тому +9

      But indonesia literally means "indian islands".

    • @Jan_Koopman
      @Jan_Koopman 8 місяців тому +2

      @@TheBakuganmaster99, yes, but those islands used to be under Dutch rule, when they were called "Nederlands-Indië"

  • @MrFearDubh
    @MrFearDubh 8 місяців тому +152

    Pakistan has said that if India changes its name to Bharat, they will change their country's name from Pakistan to India (they used to be part of British ruled India prior to 1947) and they could capitalize on the marketing value the name India has throughout the world. So I don't think India will drop that name and go only by Bharat.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +66

      Source? Also if Pakistan names themselves India that would against everything they stood for before.

    • @magma9000
      @magma9000 8 місяців тому +8

      Nah that's just south Asia index report

    • @papulrocks794
      @papulrocks794 8 місяців тому +1

      Pakistanis tend to thrive on stealing and handouts, rather than working for anything.

    • @shunkanzo7766
      @shunkanzo7766 8 місяців тому +12

      Making stuff up, I mean the nation of India does have the most fake news. Either way its hilarious how the nation is named after the geographical location of the Indus river which resides in Pakistan.... Ironic being basically named after Pakistan, and it being in a sense the true India.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +52

      @@shunkanzo7766 Indus also flows in India mate. And since 300 BCE, the name India referred to large parts of the subcontinent by Megasthenes. So no, Pakistan is not the "true" India.

  • @RiyaKumari-tb8yd
    @RiyaKumari-tb8yd 8 місяців тому +133

    I am an Indian ask me...... We have lotssssss of names
    1. Hindustan (Hindi (majority speaking language) -stan (place where someone lives) Also in India the major news paper sells from the name of " The Hindu News paper & Hindustan Times.
    2. India The name "India" is originally derived from the name of the river Sindhu (Indus River) and has been in use in Greek since Herodotus (5th century BCE).
    3. Bharat ( Because the last emperor's name was Bharat भरत comes from our most important book MAHABHARAT)
    4. Aryavarta - ("Land of the Aryans", Sanskrit pronunciation: [aːrjaːˈʋərtə]) is a term for the northern Indian subcontinent in the ancient Hindu texts such as Dharmashastras and Sutras, referring to the areas of the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Again from the most important book Mahabharata.)
    5 Bharatvarsh (Bharat (you can read above) varsh meaning "age"
    6. Hind
    And there are even more......!

    • @justforfunlol2258
      @justforfunlol2258 8 місяців тому +6

      Mahabharat is not treated as history by even all hindus, stop acting like it's an academically established fact. It's a religious belief, like islam's adam or bible's moses

    • @aktheking9841
      @aktheking9841 8 місяців тому +8

      The word bharat didn't came from Mahabharat, infact Mahabharat came from bharat

    • @Ronex-jv6pc
      @Ronex-jv6pc 8 місяців тому +8

      ​@@justforfunlol2258sry... I accept other books as myths but mahabharat is not a complete myth.... It gives us huge inside about kingdoms around 1000 bce Or before... Most historians accept mahabharata as somewhat historically relevant....

    • @aktheking9841
      @aktheking9841 8 місяців тому +4

      ​@@justforfunlol2258it is a fact, you shouldn't keep your mind closed for any info, be open minded.
      Anyways nobody cares about your personal opinion, if any random person don't believe in a historical event nobody can do anything except calling him an ideot 😂

    • @justforfunlol2258
      @justforfunlol2258 8 місяців тому +2

      @@aktheking9841 it's not my personal opinion, it's not academically recognized. Its your religious belief, like a Muslim talking about adam. Both of you are free to act like they are facts but they will remain without evidence. They are faith.

  • @pierreabbat6157
    @pierreabbat6157 8 місяців тому +47

    Hodu is mentioned in the book of Esther, which starts with King Ahasuerus (i.e. Xerxes) ruling over an empire that stretches from Hodu to Cush. The turkey is called "tarnegol Hodu" in Hebrew, which means "India chicken". (Other languages, such as French, also have similar words for turkey.) As "hodu" also means "give thanks", this gives some Jews justification for celebrating Thanksgiving and eating turkey.

    • @sahilsingh6048
      @sahilsingh6048 8 місяців тому

      Hodu metioned in bible too

    • @shaphyshaphy
      @shaphyshaphy 8 місяців тому +2

      Hodu means vomit in my native dhivehi language.😂😂😂 i'm sure its pronunced differently though.

  • @greenrobot5
    @greenrobot5 8 місяців тому +88

    This was interesting, when the spanish conquistadors saw the natives of the americas they called them "indians" thinking they were actually in India/Bharat, and that name stuck with us even to the present

    • @scyber_avatar
      @scyber_avatar 8 місяців тому +1

      orignal nat!ves who migrated to Americas thousands if years ago ... had actually migrated there via India & CH!na ... so

    • @dpr9921
      @dpr9921 8 місяців тому +20

      ​@@scyber_avatar
      Geographically impossible. The ancestors of today's Native Americans/Amerindians migrated from Asia to the Americas via the Bering land bridge, not China nor India.

    • @xELITExKILLAx
      @xELITExKILLAx 8 місяців тому +11

      @@scyber_avatarno they didn’t. Modern day native Americans ancestors came from the Siberian region

    • @NRBD2
      @NRBD2 8 місяців тому

      @@dpr9921 What route did they take from Africa to the Bering strait?

    • @lavalamp6410
      @lavalamp6410 8 місяців тому +2

      Very sad, it has been known for 500 years now the Spanish didn't reach India, I can only conclude Americans use Indian as a derogatory term to describe the Native peoples as a way to continue the genocide against them, after-all, Indians make up the largest country on the planet by population but the native peoples of the Americas continue to be marginalised and mistreated and continue to be called Indian. I have no idea why that is or why it continues to happen. Maybe by calling them Indian it is a means to deny they are the rightful owners of the land but sticking them into Reservations seems like a way to keep them in a ghetto of poverty.

  • @Shri_Hegde
    @Shri_Hegde 8 місяців тому +35

    2:30 Not only in Hindi, In all Indian Language it is called as "Bharat"... Only in foreign language (English) it is called by foreign name "India"

    • @barryirlandi4217
      @barryirlandi4217 8 місяців тому

      Hindustaan?

    • @NRBD2
      @NRBD2 8 місяців тому +1

      Is it? I thought Bhãrat is a Hindi exonym imposed on the Dravidian states. A more neutral version would go further back to the Sanskrit original.
      Edit: Other people's comments show it is more complicated than I thought. "Bhārat" is indeed a Hindi version that the Centre wants to use in English, but it seems that the name "Bhārata" originated in the South and originally may have referred to the North.

    • @priyadarshi8548
      @priyadarshi8548 8 місяців тому +5

      ​@@NRBD2Sanskrit original is used in Hindi 😑

    • @EagleOverTheSea
      @EagleOverTheSea 8 місяців тому

      ​@@priyadarshi8548I think they are referring to Jambudweepa.

    • @Allan_son
      @Allan_son 8 місяців тому +2

      @@priyadarshi8548 I very far from a Sanskrit scholar but I would have expected Bhārata because nouns rarely end in a consonant. Hindi often drops final schwa ("a") from Sanskrit words. Other Indian languages have other endings, like Bhāratām.
      -- I could be wrong.

  • @user-ih6be2xr4
    @user-ih6be2xr4 8 місяців тому +14

    Mughals as religiously tolerent 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Comedy

    • @fattiesunite2288
      @fattiesunite2288 8 місяців тому

      Most ignorant statement, brainwashed by Sanghi illiterates. If an ”invader” family stays on in India fo 9 generations, marries into Indian families each generation, builds beautiful architectural marvels, translates all Sanskrit literature and philosophy, encourage and enrich Indian classical music, refines various schools of painting and sculpture, creates the most efficient land measurement system, encourages astronomy and indigenous medicinal systems, patronizes all religious practices, even repairs temples, are they still invaders?

    • @wonderworld7721
      @wonderworld7721 8 місяців тому

  • @adamkh0r
    @adamkh0r 8 місяців тому +47

    I feel like calling India/ Hindustan an entirely external name is kind of misguided, as ppl of the southern Indus River, which they call Dareya-e-Sindh (the River Sindh), call themselves Sindhi, people of the Indus River. Its name changed to encompass more people over time, similar to how Europe started off as a name for peoples in the Levant but eventually encompassed what we now know as Europe.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +4

      Fair point.

    • @elderDimonkey
      @elderDimonkey 8 місяців тому

      See sindhi is an ethnicity and India and Hindustan, Hindu is entirely an external name bcz it's morphed and created by other the name sindhi and sindh is ours but I like if
      Your name is jhon and if I started calling you yohanna is it external or internal name

    • @adamkh0r
      @adamkh0r 8 місяців тому +4

      i mean names change over time, China /t͡ʃaɪnə/ is a great example. During the Qing Dynasty, ppl speaking Sanskrit called it Chīn चीन (chinese q is pronounced /ɕ/ not /tʃ/). from there it spread through Persian and Arabic to European languages, and now everyone calls them China, even tho they call themselves 中國 [ʈʂʊ́ŋ.kwǒ].
      It seems difficult to call China by a name that’s hard to pronounce for outsiders. Similarly, Bharat भारत is pronounced [bʱäː.ɾət̪] in Modern Standard Hindi, containing sounds most outsiders aren’t familiar with.

    • @elderDimonkey
      @elderDimonkey 8 місяців тому

      @@adamkh0r I am not saying that i am saying that name changing happens but by their ppl only then it's only internal name otherwise chin Or china is external name only so india is although it's based of an Indian River but we don't call it indus if we took chinas internal name and with time morphs that will not become it's internal name if China it self the inside ppl morph it than it will be like
      Somone else morphing your name doesn't make that name your rather you morphing your name makes that name yours the persians morphed sindhu into hindu hence hindu is not the internal name like if the ppl inside it morps sindhu into sindus Or sindura Or even hindu then the name would be an internal name

    • @elderDimonkey
      @elderDimonkey 8 місяців тому

      @@adamkh0r if persians hindustan and Greek indus is an internal name then same should be for Hebrew Hodu Chinese Yindu and Japanese Indojin would also be internal name only na
      But they ain't
      In Constitution we mentioned Bharat as our name in local lang and India in English bcz in Latin script Bharat can't be pronounced hence to not let foreigners make fun with our name India too is our official name bcz you can see even this guy isn't able to pronounce the sound of भ bh rahather he pronounced it ब b and even he pronounced the wrong R except his pronounciation of Ta other are wrong so we not gonna make it as internal name barata how he pronounced so for outsiders we have India and for us we have Bharat, India

  • @martijndekok
    @martijndekok 8 місяців тому +97

    Small correction. The Dutch word Indië refers to the former Dutch Indies, now Indonesia. India is also called India in Dutch.

    • @sewerrat
      @sewerrat 8 місяців тому +15

      Indonesia was named after India so that's another thing.

    • @ankurantil6137
      @ankurantil6137 8 місяців тому +5

      Indonesia has been part of Indian empires (empires originating within India) multiple times in past .....like that of Chola Empire
      India or similar words were collectively used for the whole of South east and south Asia because these countries have been Europe of the past....the word India was loosely an equivalent of Europe Before a large unified landmass/country adopted that name India and other terms were coined to identify the remaining area

    • @ReirtoRRNTX
      @ReirtoRRNTX 8 місяців тому +6

      ​@@ankurantil6137not exactly "part of Indian Empire" but India influenced empire, i think there some Indian Empire stretched to at least Sumatra but i'm not sure

    • @sunnychoudhary3288
      @sunnychoudhary3288 8 місяців тому +2

      @@ReirtoRRNTX They were briefly, under direct Chola rule and for some time under indirect rule and yes, they used to be part of a shared culture that stretched to the Philippines in a purist sense but also influenced China, Japan, and Korea on the eastern front. And it would not be right to call it India-influenced culture because ideas flowed both ways. So we have a shared ownership over dharmic culture which we were able to preserve more of compared to other countries.

    • @ReirtoRRNTX
      @ReirtoRRNTX 8 місяців тому

      @@sunnychoudhary3288 Yep true

  • @IndraKatiK
    @IndraKatiK 8 місяців тому +74

    Interestingly "barat" in indonesian language means "west" and india is indeed geographically west of indonesia.
    But the name change could have some awkward consequences, for example when we previously referred to western movies as "film barat" it would now means indian movies? lol

    • @shandya
      @shandya 8 місяців тому +22

      Also another interesting part: the word “barat” in Indonesian was not originated from sanskrit or referred to the land of India (like ones might expect). But it was originated from a totally unrelated proto-malayo-polynesian word, habarat, which referred to southwest monsoon wind.

    • @mdc462
      @mdc462 8 місяців тому +8

      ​@shandya so this is where filipinos get "habagat" from
      if india renames itself to bharat, filipino racism towards india is going to have a field day. Barat in tagalog means "stingy"

    • @pierreabbat6157
      @pierreabbat6157 8 місяців тому +7

      The opposite of barat is timur. Timor is so called because it's east of some other islands. So Timor Timur is East East. (It's Timor-Leste in Portuguese and Timor Lorosa'e in Tetum, which account for the code TL.)

    • @shandya
      @shandya 8 місяців тому +2

      @@pierreabbat6157 yes, “East East” is really interesting indeed. And “Timur” also originated from a proto-malayo-polynesian word referring to the east monsoon wind.

    • @nickh6619
      @nickh6619 8 місяців тому

      @@shandyathis is interesting, what about north and south? are they similar to country names?

  • @Voyagerch75
    @Voyagerch75 8 місяців тому +175

    Of course, any country has the right to rename itself, however this could lead to lots of confusion:
    1. India becomes Bharat.
    2. To troll their beloved neighbours, Pakistan lays claim to the name India (since it's actually on the Indus river) and renames itself, too.
    3. Now that the name Pakistan is unoccupied, it gets claimed by Bangladesh (which once used to be called East Pakistan).

    • @QH96
      @QH96 8 місяців тому +54

      Imagine India vs Bharat at the next cricket world cup.

    • @conceptualisingdisapproval
      @conceptualisingdisapproval 8 місяців тому +17

      Tbh this would never happen. 2 and 3 are literally impossible.

    • @kenaikuskokwim9694
      @kenaikuskokwim9694 8 місяців тому +17

      Let's clarify this: any country has the right to rename itself *in its own language*. They might have a right to veto exonyms that are insulting or politically contentious, but otherwise, let others use what fits their own tongues best.

    • @shandya
      @shandya 8 місяців тому +1

      I would love to see this happen lol

    • @pigeon5601
      @pigeon5601 8 місяців тому +16

      Bangladesh would never lay claim to the name Pakistan lmao

  • @QH96
    @QH96 8 місяців тому +85

    The Bharatha were a Vedic Aryan tribe within the north indian state known as the Aryavart (Land of Aryans). After the battle of the 10 kings the Bharatha aryan tribe came to dominate. Overtime the whole of the Indian subcontinent came to be known as Bharat.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +6

      Yeah

    • @fattiesunite2288
      @fattiesunite2288 8 місяців тому +2

      Source?

    • @QH96
      @QH96 8 місяців тому

      @@fattiesunite2288scroll down to the bharat section.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India#Bh%C4%81rata
      The tribe:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharatas_(tribe)

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +1

      @@fattiesunite2288 Wikipedia

    • @fattiesunite2288
      @fattiesunite2288 8 місяців тому +5

      @@based4560 same wikipedia that has an edit button righttttt

  • @kc4276
    @kc4276 8 місяців тому +13

    I find it interesting (although I don’t know if there’s a relation), that in Arabic ‘bharat’ means spice, and in Malay (and I think even in Bahasa Indonesia) ‘bharat’ means west (which is the direction of India from them).

    • @michaelcaffery5038
      @michaelcaffery5038 8 місяців тому +2

      That's interesting. Yes it does mean spices in Arabic. Perhaps it came from Indian traders using the word Bharat for their country and so Arabs used that word for spices as it was the main source. Or a coincidence.

    • @hawkingdawking4572
      @hawkingdawking4572 3 місяці тому

      Not true. Arabic has no such notion. All propaganda.

  • @amitexo
    @amitexo 8 місяців тому +6

    A little correction about Jambudvipa. Although Dvipa is sanskrit for Island, it also meant continent due to the fact that there are other Dvipas mentioned in the Hindu Geography that are not islands either. Having said that India can be considered to be an island in the sense that the geography is such that its is surrounded by water all around-ocean to the south, indus to the west, Ganges to the north and Bramhaputra to the east meaning all borders of ancient India might have been WATER which would technically make it an Island. Also Jambu might have been related to the approximate understood shape rather than the fuit itself but could well be either or both.

  • @rage8673
    @rage8673 8 місяців тому +126

    Saying Mughal empire was religiously tolerant, is same as saying Colonial powers were peaceful towards Native American Tribes or Hitler being tolerant to Jews.

    • @rutvikrs
      @rutvikrs 8 місяців тому +5

      Eminently historical. 🥲

    • @bluebitproductions2836
      @bluebitproductions2836 8 місяців тому +21

      That's not correct. They were obviosly not following our modern ideas of religious freedom, but compared to similar empires they were more religiously tolerant than one would expect.

    • @shh11111
      @shh11111 8 місяців тому

      Are you sure about that? Because goung by your juxtaposition there should have been no hindus left in india but of course its not the case and you people are still the majority of the country. Maybe if you take your head out of the propagandist tv channels and whatsapp forwards, you might be able to at least put a fair argument.

    • @shh11111
      @shh11111 8 місяців тому

      Keeping up with my previous comment, check some religious wise stats of india's population which says hindus make upto 80% population of india, so either you comment is true and you guys just breed like rabbits to make such a large proportion of the population or its completely false. Which one is it?

    • @varunkhugshal9049
      @varunkhugshal9049 8 місяців тому +17

      ​@@bluebitproductions2836clearly you've neither read babarnama nor aaine e akbari nor fatwa e Alamgiri, all biographies written by their own court writers. Read and let us know what is tolerant about it.

  • @kenaikuskokwim9694
    @kenaikuskokwim9694 8 місяців тому +22

    Korea also has three names, and all are indigenous: Hanguk (in the South), Joseon (the North), and variations on Korea in most of the rest of the world. They've all been used locally to denote the land. Evidently, Korea is the oldest, and that is what stuck abroad. Let the locals argue about the newer forms.

    • @Novusod
      @Novusod 8 місяців тому +1

      The historical name of Korea is Goryeo.
      Outsiders couldn't pronounce Goryeo and thus called it Korea.

  • @scyber_avatar
    @scyber_avatar 8 місяців тому +9

    saying "during M0gal Empire there was amazing rel!gi0us t0lerance" ... is like saying "during H!tler's rule there was amazing peace in Eur0pe" 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂
    what were you sm0king while researching this particular information huh ?

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +1

      And if you point out this hypocrisy, they just call it Hindu Nationalist propaganda 😂

    • @fattiesunite2288
      @fattiesunite2288 8 місяців тому

      And what did you want him to say? Most ignorant statement, brainwashed by Sanghi illiterates. If an ”invader” family stays on in India fo 9 generations, marries into Indian families each generation, builds beautiful architectural marvels, translates all Sanskrit literature and philosophy, encourage and enrich Indian classical music, refines various schools of painting and sculpture, creates the most efficient land measurement system, encourages astronomy and indigenous medicinal systems, patronizes all religious practices, even repairs temples, and sky rockets the economy on the too are they still invaders?

    • @priyadarshi8548
      @priyadarshi8548 8 місяців тому +1

      That was a stretch ngl

    • @priyadarshi8548
      @priyadarshi8548 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@fattiesunite2288no need to get offended
      Ayodhya Kashi Mathura 3 holiest site in Hinduism all were demolished
      That's just a fact

    • @Raveded
      @Raveded 8 місяців тому +1

      Truly western education system moment

  • @Insill
    @Insill 8 місяців тому +22

    One always learns something new every day. Never heard of the terms "exonym" and "endonym" before. Another example of those is Finland and Suomi.

    • @christopherbentley7289
      @christopherbentley7289 8 місяців тому

      I often wonder if Suomi is in any way related to the English word 'swamp', given that the 'Fin' bit of Finland is a slight corruption of the English word 'fen'. I always spell the family of languages to which Finnish belongs intentionally as 'Fenno-Ugrian' to spell that out!

    • @aviator2117
      @aviator2117 8 місяців тому

      @@christopherbentley7289nope, not related at all. Btw if you have questions about etymology you can look them up

    • @tenacious3911
      @tenacious3911 8 місяців тому +5

      @@christopherbentley7289 Swedish and English are related ("Finland" being the Swedish name), Finnish and English aren't related at all. In fact English is more closely related to Hindi than it is to Finnish.

    • @christopherbentley7289
      @christopherbentley7289 8 місяців тому

      @@tenacious3911 I take that totally on board, but there is still some 'osmosis' that goes on between the Indo-European and Fenno-Ugrian languages in terms of vocabulary. So, it isn't out of the question.

    • @flamencoprof
      @flamencoprof 8 місяців тому

      The so-called "Gypsies" (an English exonym) of Andalusia are within Spain (English exonym) or España (their endonym) are generally known by the endonym Calé, or the exonym Gitanos. :-)

  • @Andrew36597
    @Andrew36597 8 місяців тому +11

    I feel like removing the name would be a mistake, India is one of the most famous countries in the world and the association is with a people, a culture, a food and many other things. It is generally used in positive or neutral ways and it’s origins aren’t of an offensive nature but just a geographical feature. I think introducing this as an alternate name is definitely a good idea but universally removing it’s almost universally known name, may cause some backlash or confusion (at least in the short term )

    • @durgeshn8791
      @durgeshn8791 8 місяців тому +1

      Indian government is not removing the name 'india' instead government wants to promote our 2nd official Name "Bharat" more often.

    • @_A.t.g
      @_A.t.g 8 місяців тому

      @@durgeshn8791 22 name hai officially india ke. Government sirf opposition ke liya karri hai or kuch nahi.

  • @thebestevertherewas
    @thebestevertherewas 8 місяців тому +54

    The origin of the word BHARAT, itself come from the SOUTH INDIA !
    In Sangam literature, dating from approximately the 3rd century BCE contains references to Bharat in the form of "பாரதம்" (Pāraṭam) or "பாரதம் நாடு" (Pāraṭam Nāṭu), which can be translated as "the land of Bharat" or "the land of the Bharata people." These references often allude to the northern regions of the subcontinent.
    Not to mention Ancient Hindu epics like the Mahabharata !

    • @Not_Deb
      @Not_Deb 8 місяців тому +15

      It's nothing like South India, it was a country of Sanatan Dharma and Bharat was a Sanatani King so saying it as just South India is pretty narcissistic

    • @iqbal259
      @iqbal259 8 місяців тому +12

      It was a term brought by Jain monks who shifted South. Not a Dravidian word

    • @theriam6281
      @theriam6281 8 місяців тому +10

      @@iqbal259 it is always one "Iqbal" who has a problem with anything pertaining to the ancient civilizational Conciousness of this nation

    • @iqbal259
      @iqbal259 8 місяців тому

      @@theriam6281 yes, one Iqbal always has a problem with half baked lies, one 'Iqbal' who wrote Saare Jaha Se Acha Hindustan humara too. So shut your bhakta ass if all you want to bring is personal bias.

    • @user-lt5no1xt1z
      @user-lt5no1xt1z 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@theriam6281😂😂

  • @himanshukuanr7832
    @himanshukuanr7832 8 місяців тому +5

    India : Brand 👍
    Bharat : Emotion ❤

    • @_A.t.g
      @_A.t.g 8 місяців тому

      Kuch bhi. That emotion for most people is indifference. Naming a country after a king who died long ago is pathetic.

    • @divyanshtripathi2421
      @divyanshtripathi2421 5 місяців тому

      @@_A.t.g bharat means enlightenment or knowledge. Chutiye.

  • @Bigus_Dickus_6996
    @Bigus_Dickus_6996 8 місяців тому +2

    My father calls it Bharat in normal conversation, but only calls India when there is cricket or football matches are played

  • @ilakya
    @ilakya 8 місяців тому +6

    I'm Thai and as you know we use a lot of Sanskrit loan words. We also has called India as "Jambudvipa" too, or in our tongue "Chomputweep". And those words are understandable to us. Tweep or Dvipa in our modern Thai word is used as a common noun for the meaning of the continent. And the Chompu or Jambu is the name of a kind of budding tree. (Also currently use commonly in the modern Thai noun for the pink color) So maybe it's not directly translated as the blossoming tree island but the tree's land.

    • @islandsunset
      @islandsunset 8 місяців тому +1

      Jambu is Jamun I guess. It is a sweet fruit. Google it. It was used to make purple, violet and pink dyes in Ancient India. Do you have that fruit in Thailand?? What is it called??

  • @kandipiatkowski8589
    @kandipiatkowski8589 8 місяців тому +13

    When i was a kid, it always confused me that the people of the country of India was the same as the Indians in America. I ended up calling the people from India as Indish, so that the Indians were more known as American Indians. Of course, that was before the "Native American" and "indigenous people" terms were used. Seems Indian may not have been correct for either, although it has been popular for many years.....lol

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 8 місяців тому +1

      Indian River -> Sindhu
      Persian Slang -> Hindu
      Greek Mis-approprated word -> Indoi
      English Word -> India
      Native Indian word for our Nation : Bhaarat, The Land named after our Legendary Hindu Emperor Bharat (Indian equivalent of King Arthur), Who united 10 Kingdoms and ruled over it. Bhaarat is supposed to have lived sometime before 3300 B.C btw..

    • @karaqakkzl
      @karaqakkzl 8 місяців тому

      ​​@@hindurashtra63 and what your legendary king name's means? Like Japan comes from Nihon and it means Land of Sun 日 (Ni) rise 本 (hon). Or China just Zhong 中 (Middle) Guo 国 (Kingdom). Is Bharat a meaningful name or it's just gibberish sound comes from the king's parents?

    • @sewerrat
      @sewerrat 8 місяців тому +2

      @@karaqakkzlBharata refers to Agni, the god of fire.

    • @paulomi9351
      @paulomi9351 8 місяців тому +3

      ​@@sewerrat
      Also it was land of spiritual seekers 😊
      Bharat, a Sanskrit word, literally translates into - 'to bear/ to carry' and means 'one who is in search of light/ knowledge'. India has been historically known as Bharat, which means 'one in search of light/ knowledge'."
      Light of knowledge removes darkness of ignorance
      😢

    • @michaelcaffery5038
      @michaelcaffery5038 8 місяців тому +3

      The usual explanation is Christopher Columbus mistook the native Americans for Indians because he thought he had reached Asia. That's because he miscalculated the size of the earth and didn't know America was there. He was trying to establish a trade route with East Asia by travelling westward. Don't know if that's really the origin. Yes, they did know, contrary to what many believe, the earth is round.

  • @0arjun077
    @0arjun077 8 місяців тому +4

    According to Vishnu Purana
    उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् ।
    वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र संततिः ।।
    (Uttaraṃ yatsamudrasya himādreścaiva dakṣiṇam
    varṣaṃ tadbhārataṃ nāma bhāratī yatra santatiḥ)
    This shloka means: “The country (Varsam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bharatam; there dwell the descendants of Bharata.

    • @hawkingdawking4572
      @hawkingdawking4572 3 місяці тому

      The so-called Vishnu Purna is a British era concoction. As there was no knowledge of detailed geography before them.

    • @MudithV
      @MudithV 3 місяці тому +1

      @@hawkingdawking4572 Are you serious? Vishnu Purana dates back to the 1st millennium BCE.

    • @hawkingdawking4572
      @hawkingdawking4572 3 місяці тому

      @@MudithV There is no evidence for Vishnu Purana being 1000 BCE old. As usual, these are typical history stretching exercises done by Hindus. The current Vishnu Purana popped up in the late Midieval times and it had undergone several revisions, reforms and additions suited to the day and age. The Vishnu Purana could be based on old oral stories and myths but the details are sketchy. There are no manuscripts of any proto-Hindu type text earlier than 14th century in India.

  • @PepperAnnRunway
    @PepperAnnRunway 8 місяців тому

    my friend/roommate was saying how i’m always full of information and he always learning vicariously through all my always learning and i was able to give him this important, interesting and current information…ugh the validation is oh soo sweet… anyways thanks man i love you fr been watching for years

  • @pallavpanjikar4064
    @pallavpanjikar4064 8 місяців тому +3

    Man I laughed so hard when you said mughals had great religious tolerance 😂😂

  • @Alexander-mw1ek
    @Alexander-mw1ek 8 місяців тому +5

    I once asked three Indians what they call india and started a war at dinnertime

  • @PockASqueeno
    @PockASqueeno 8 місяців тому +9

    So I know most Indians are multilingual. For the Indians who speak both Hindi and English (and likely their state language too like Urdu, Telugu, etc.), do they use the names interchangeably? Do they call it India when speaking English and Bhārat when speaking Hindi, or do they generally just use one name to simplify things? And what about those local state languages? Can any Indians/Bhāratians let us know?

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +6

      It's very interchangeable. People generally say both. Perhaps in a more formal setting, especially in newschannels, speeches, or formal writing Bharata is used, whereas in a more casual setting, and settings where English is dominant, the term India is used. Nobody uses the term Jambudvipa anymore and Hindusthan is more likely to be used by speakers of Hindi/Urdu or Muslims but even this term is kinda falling off.

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому +3

      @@dwarasamudra8889 Hindustan is still very widely used in movies, shows, news media and songs also popularize it. Companies like HCL (Hindustan Corporation limited and Hindustan Petroleum) also exist. It's not fading out anytime soon.

    • @priyadarshi8548
      @priyadarshi8548 8 місяців тому +1

      Almost all local state languages use a variation of Bharat
      Yes India and Bharat are used interchangeably

    • @TheBakuganmaster99
      @TheBakuganmaster99 8 місяців тому +3

      I am from south india. In telugu, its called bharatam. So we use both names interchangeably. However, i dont think hindustan is very popular in the south.

    • @nathanoyeght
      @nathanoyeght 8 місяців тому +1

      FYR, the people of Bharat are known as Bharatiya, not Bharatians.

  • @helloahla239
    @helloahla239 8 місяців тому

    Is there word industry (and its deivied words like indistrialisation) derived from the Indus river?

  • @Moses_Ben_Aaron
    @Moses_Ben_Aaron 8 місяців тому +16

    Love My Indian Brothers From Israel
    We Are Brothers 🇮🇱 🇮🇳

  • @roseashkiiii4361
    @roseashkiiii4361 8 місяців тому +7

    Ive actually been wondering about this lately

  • @HIMANSHU79879
    @HIMANSHU79879 8 місяців тому +4

    it's not mythology ( ramayana & mahabharata) it's our ithihas (as it happened)

    • @PeloquinDavid
      @PeloquinDavid 8 місяців тому +1

      "Mythology" is the wrong word, clearly. These are better described as "epics" - even "historical epics", much like the Homeric tales of Greece that also seem to have a basis in historical fact.
      But for most readers nowadays, there is no mistaking the presence of a lot of at least legendary material in them as well as some clearly "mythical"/"religious" elements.

  • @03.achyuthans39
    @03.achyuthans39 8 місяців тому +5

    Jambudvipa actually is the Sanskrit translation of the Tamil word that means the same. Also it’s highly unlikely that the govt will change the name. It might be only to bring up the use of Bharat more in English. Constitution gives right to both the names in all languages, not this in English and that in Hindi or something

    • @Hari_Haran_B
      @Hari_Haran_B 3 місяці тому +1

      not everything is from tamil. You tamil guys must stop with this chauvinism

  • @bhushandaware6118
    @bhushandaware6118 8 місяців тому +8

    Jambudvipa means the continent of India.....

  • @mikeberkshire8579
    @mikeberkshire8579 8 місяців тому +10

    I barely remember that city being called Bombay, as I've remembered it being called Mumbai all my life. Didn't the change happen during the 1990s?
    Also, wasn't Sri Lanka once called Ceylon during the 1960s?

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому

      ...and it was the Hindu fundamentalists who clamoured for the name change of Bombay to Mumbai in the 1990s, a related group to the BJP known as the RSS.

    • @runajain5773
      @runajain5773 8 місяців тому +8

      ​@@aasifazimabadi786actually it was renameby shiv sena because bombay word consider british colonial legacy.

    • @nathanoyeght
      @nathanoyeght 8 місяців тому +8

      ​@@aasifazimabadi786Just like Muslim fundamentalists removed names of many historical places in the region known as Pakistan since 1947.
      Talk of blind spots!

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому

      You are correct. It was the Shiv Sena. @@runajain5773

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому

      You questioned my Indianness because I'm not a Hindu. There's not a lot of weight to what you say. Perhaps I'm wrong, but you're just a pro-Hindutva troll.@@nathanoyeght

  • @deldarel
    @deldarel 8 місяців тому +4

    in Dutch we don't call it Indië (indi-uh. The ë isn't an umlaut but a trema, indicating diaeresis like in French).
    Indië is more used how in English 'Indies' is used.
    We call it India too.

  • @RedSupergiant
    @RedSupergiant 8 місяців тому +2

    -Stan or -Sthan स्थान in Sanskrit means place or region or station or dwelling or abode
    It can also mean Position

    • @hawkingdawking4572
      @hawkingdawking4572 3 місяці тому

      Not Sanskrit but Avestan or older Persian. Sanskrit is an early Middle ages' language and fairly new one

    • @MudithV
      @MudithV 3 місяці тому +1

      @@hawkingdawking4572 False, Sanskrit predates both the languages you mentioned. 'Stan' is derived from the Sanskrit word 'Sthan' for 'place or land' of somebody.

    • @hawkingdawking4572
      @hawkingdawking4572 3 місяці тому

      @@MudithV Sanskrit became Sanskrit when the Avestan language migrated to Indian regions. Sanskrit is the Indianised Old Iranian language.

  • @shushunk00
    @shushunk00 8 місяців тому +1

    2:25 bh is a bassy airy version of b in bharat(bhā rut t is softer like how u taco
    In Spanish)
    Just like dh in Buddha ,gandhi
    Gh in ghee

  • @HalfEye79
    @HalfEye79 8 місяців тому +5

    It would be great, if you could do a video about Arminius, the chieftain of the Cherusci tribe, who won in the Teutoburg Forest against the Romans (Varusschlacht). He also is known und the name Hermann the Cheruscan and he has a great statue of him.

    • @christopherbentley7289
      @christopherbentley7289 8 місяців тому

      Mitten in den Neunzigen arbeitete ich als Praktikant bei einer Ausgrabung in Osnabrück, währenddessen ich die Ausgrabungen in Kalkriese besuchte (an der aktuellen Jahreszeit). Ich weiß nicht, wie so ein Thema bei „Name Explain“ laufen würde, aber...

    • @ArgentavisMagnificens
      @ArgentavisMagnificens 8 місяців тому

      Quintilius Varus, give me back my legions!

  • @deusmachinima1189
    @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому +9

    The name will forever remain India and Indian for me as an Indian. Bharat is our native name but internationally India is too iconic to be replaced

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 8 місяців тому

    I’m so glad you’re finally starting to get set up where we will use the actual native names for countries. It’s so much more interesting to me.

  • @nancyclark864
    @nancyclark864 8 місяців тому

    No new videos this week? What happened?

  • @dhruvseoni8418
    @dhruvseoni8418 8 місяців тому +18

    Mughals: Didn’t use “India”.
    This guy: Removal of “India” is removal of Mughals.

    • @PrinceChauhan010
      @PrinceChauhan010 8 місяців тому

      YE NO RELATION NO LOGIC.. JABARDASTI KA MUSLIM

  • @adityaguru6654
    @adityaguru6654 8 місяців тому +2

    Bharat is the name of my Country. The "Vishnu Puran" one of the 18 major Purans defines the country as the one which is between the Himalaya in the North and the Samudra (Ocean) in the South and between the Sindhu (Indus) in the West and the Brahmaputra in the East.

  • @pac1fic055
    @pac1fic055 8 місяців тому +2

    It’s called India (or something very similar) in just about all languages.

  • @DKS_London
    @DKS_London 8 місяців тому +2

    Apart from the 3 names there is also a 4th name which is very famous and it is 'Hind'. This name is used in central Asia and the Arabic countries as well as in the country itself.

  • @magma9000
    @magma9000 8 місяців тому +4

    HINDU NATIONALIST BOTS ON THEIR WAY TO THE COMMENTS 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @billyr2904
    @billyr2904 8 місяців тому +4

    So India means 'the land of the river', and Hinduism means 'the ideas of the river'.

    • @karaqakkzl
      @karaqakkzl 8 місяців тому

      If not Bharat, better call it Gangesia, most of Indus in Pakistan and most of Ganges in India

    • @o_s-24
      @o_s-24 8 місяців тому

      ​@@karaqakkzlor gangestan

    • @QH96
      @QH96 8 місяців тому +4

      Hinduism is actually called Sanatan Dharma. Which means the eternal religion.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +1

      India means land beyond the indus

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@karaqakkzlbut the Ganges doesn't cover most of India. Maybe 35-40% at most.

  • @BigFred458
    @BigFred458 8 місяців тому +1

    I'm 70 year old American. I have called India, India for the better part of a century. I'll be happy to call India whatever name India wishes. But I will slip up occasionally because I am old.

  • @bridgetdavis9752
    @bridgetdavis9752 8 місяців тому +2

    You had me at Mahabharata ♥♥

  • @harrisonofthenorth
    @harrisonofthenorth 8 місяців тому +12

    Great video, my take on the politics is that just because India is considering changing its own endonym references, it's government has no authority over the exonyms that foreign countries use for it. Alot of people - including expat Indians - still use the exonym Bombay, for the endonym called Mumbai, for example.

    • @urmwhynot
      @urmwhynot 8 місяців тому +7

      What are you trying to say? Turkey changed it's name recently and everyone followed suit and now it's Turkiye. It doesn't matter what expats says but I've never heard an Indian say Bombay unless they are speaking to the ignorant 😊

    • @harrisonofthenorth
      @harrisonofthenorth 8 місяців тому +6

      @@urmwhynot 'Everyone'? I'm in the middle of publishing a book in which Turkey is called Turkey, and by large all of the papers call it Turkey. Not everyone has changed to calling Kiev by Kyiv, many people still don't call it Ukraine but instead call it The Ukraine, Just because you haven't heard any Indians still referring to Bombay, merely means that you are in a different circle, but the point is, many still do, and fundamentally no country has control over its exonyms, just its endonyms. What is extroadinmary is that you have come out against my comment, and yet a whole range of countries are happy having different endonyms to their exonyms, such as Finland (Suomi), Germany (Deutchland), etc. It all comes down to jurisdiction, countries have jurisdiction over their endonyms but not their exonyms.

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@anthonyharrison486 Doesn't matter what foreigners call Indian cities or regions. We know they won't be able to pronounce them anyway. If Bharata becomes the sole name of India, it probably won't catch on true. But no young person in India or around the world is still saying Bombay, Madras, Calcutta etc. Only old people have that habit, and gradually those names will be forgotten.

    • @harrisonofthenorth
      @harrisonofthenorth 8 місяців тому

      @@dwarasamudra8889 You're a naive idiot, someone tells you an observation and you say it wasn't observed. Indians proudly create their own endonyms, meanwhile the rest of the world chooses their own endonyms. It's simple fact. Try turning your light on.

    • @SolidusDaedalus
      @SolidusDaedalus 8 місяців тому +2

      @@urmwhynot absolutely no one uses türkiye lol, it's always gonna be Turkey everywhere that's not an official document

  • @JanBanJoovi-ol1qv
    @JanBanJoovi-ol1qv 8 місяців тому +4

    Each place or country has different names at some point in time. So if we have to follow such route, we will spend the rest of our lives changing everything.

    • @_A.t.g
      @_A.t.g 8 місяців тому

      This is just happening because the opposition collision decided to name themselves I.N.D.I.A

  • @dineshmohanlal5697
    @dineshmohanlal5697 8 місяців тому +2

    While the rest of the Worlds Nations strive to retain and in many cases revert to their original Native Names, Cultural and Religious Practices etc. (eg. Islamic and Christian Countries), Bharat as a sovereign state also has the right to revert to their Ancestral Past as their BIRTH RIGHT. .
    Dhanyavaad Narendra Modi Jee 🙏 . . . Jai Sri Raam🕉 . . . Jai Bharat🇮🇳

  • @chrisallen9706
    @chrisallen9706 8 місяців тому

    I've seen another name used to commonly to mean Indian. Not sure of correct spelling but looks something like "dessie". How does that name feature in this topic?

    • @priyadarshi8548
      @priyadarshi8548 8 місяців тому

      'Desi' is a informal denonym used for North Indians

    • @nathanoyeght
      @nathanoyeght 8 місяців тому

      Des/Desh means land/country.
      Like Bangladesh - Land of Bengalis.
      Swades - My country/land, Pardes - Foreign country/land (both are names of Bollywood movies)
      Desi is the adjective which means of/belonging to that land (or something local) in contrast with videshi (of foriegn origin)
      Sri Lankans use the word Dhesiya to mean anything local (which is south of South India), so not sure if there is any north Indian connotation to this word

  • @playhard719
    @playhard719 8 місяців тому +9

    Correction: India was called as Bharat not just in Hindi but in all official languages of Bharat.
    The explanation of India is almost accurate but not quite so, but the explanation of Bharat is completely wrong, as expected.
    The funniest part in this video is when he says Bharat comes from Hindi, but Jambudvipa came from Sanskrit. Bharat also came from Sanskrit and its origin older than Jambudvipa.
    and the "Mughals had amazing religious tolerance" is as true as "Nazis loved Jews and Gypsies", learn the history dumb dumbs.
    Please people if you want to know the true origins of countries name, please hear explanation from people of that country.
    Search of Sanjeev Sanyal explanation of name Bharat in UA-cam for more accurate reasoning and logic behind the name.

    • @nailartguy3363
      @nailartguy3363 8 місяців тому +2

      Thank you for the explanation! I just watched Sanjeev Sanyal’s video and I learned a lot. I just started learning देवनागरी and हिन्दी now, so I agree that it’s important that I learn about history from the people of the country.

  • @Ggdivhjkjl
    @Ggdivhjkjl 8 місяців тому +4

    Bharat also includes Pakistan. By making such statements, these politicians are claiming authority over all the land of Pakistan too! Are they intending to invade?

    • @basantprasadsgarden8365
      @basantprasadsgarden8365 8 місяців тому +6

      You will come to know in the Future

    • @priyadarshi8548
      @priyadarshi8548 8 місяців тому +5

      There is a reason South Asia is called Indian Subcontinent
      That doesn't mean they are claiming Pakistan

    • @atharvagawkar4827
      @atharvagawkar4827 8 місяців тому +2

      pakisthan is lost cause, invading it is of litreally no use, what benefits will it give it to india? prosperity? universities?anything special that is unique to it?

    • @hentype
      @hentype 8 місяців тому +1

      Same logic with "Germany/Deutschland". It may technically also include Austria and Luxembourg but they're not part of the governed territories. Does Germany plan to invade them according to your logic?
      Same for the "United States of America". If you didn't know already, America includes Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and many other nations. Does USA plan to invade both continents?

  • @Azrael1st
    @Azrael1st 8 місяців тому +2

    Bharat sounds nice. It’s better than a name given to us by the Europeans

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому +1

      I disagree. India is far too iconic to be replaced

    • @fattiesunite2288
      @fattiesunite2288 8 місяців тому

      India is was better

    • @yashb.suryawanshi9936
      @yashb.suryawanshi9936 8 місяців тому

      @@deusmachinima1189 India name has no meaning just because it is easier to pronounce does mean that the other name is less meaning Bharat logical meaning is bha(weight)rat(chariot) weight on chariot.

  • @RedSupergiant
    @RedSupergiant 8 місяців тому +1

    The origin of the name Bharat भारत is a little older than that.
    Bharat भारत which comes from Bharata, the King who was the son of Rishabhadeva.
    At 5:38, the image you used to show a man holding a deer/fawn is about this Bharata who was the son of Rishabadeva. Bharata here builds an attachment with that deer.
    Many people also say it’s the Bharat son of Dushyant and Shakuntala after who the country was named.
    This king Bharat happens to be the ancestor of Kauravas and Pandavas.

  • @nlDt87
    @nlDt87 8 місяців тому +4

    Mughal were so secular so generous that other religion believer would have to pay tax to be in their religion and they were not allowed to build their place of worship an inch taller than the nearest mosque.
    Read and then speak in your videos

  • @aidanwotherspoon905
    @aidanwotherspoon905 8 місяців тому +9

    It’s interesting that the name India is an exonym, but if you go back far enough (aka, to the time the locals were telling that Greek explorer what their river is called), is actually an endonym

    • @islandsunset
      @islandsunset 8 місяців тому

      how?

    • @gurudatta_rao
      @gurudatta_rao 8 місяців тому

      Illogical

    • @isaacbruner65
      @isaacbruner65 8 місяців тому

      ​​@@islandsunsetAn ethnic group that lives along the river in Pakistan still calls themselves Sindhi, which comes from the Sanskrit word for "river". The same etymology as India. Clearly a version of the name India was an endonym at some point, but maybe not one that's very applicable to modern India.

    • @islandsunset
      @islandsunset 8 місяців тому

      @@isaacbruner65 I get what you are trying to say but no version of India was endonym at that time.
      India came from Sindhu by which our civilization started. So yes, India is a very corrupt form of Sindhu. By that logic I can say it is an endonym. But no people in ancient India identified themselves by the river. The Indus valley script might change this belief. For Sindhi people I can say that it is a modern identifier. Sindhi language is a modern Indo Aryan Language which came from a language that was called Apabrahamsa. Maybe it is a 1000 year old language (best guess) but by that time India came to identify itself by the river and the name stuck because of foreign travellers. My above explanation was for ancient times.

  • @yashwardhantubid2581
    @yashwardhantubid2581 8 місяців тому +1

    The Bharat word also means which carries or bear Agni(Fire) or will of Fire and search of knowledge that's why it was called bharatvarshA or Aryavarta and Bharat name is given by legendary king barat chakravorthy one of the most powerful anf greatest king of all time in way before ancient india of Mahabharata Sanskrit Epics

  • @MrMomo182
    @MrMomo182 8 місяців тому

    Looking forward to going down to the local Bharat Restaurant and having a BPA.

  • @SJking-gk4go
    @SJking-gk4go 8 місяців тому +8

    In ancient times, india was once known as Abyssinia, which was East Ethiopia. Two Ethiopias one west of red sea ,one east which is India. 😊

    • @cluesagi
      @cluesagi 8 місяців тому +2

      Do you have a source for that?

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 8 місяців тому +2

      Well, That's because the Europeans combined the Maps of Asia and Africa together. Most people though of Asia as a Mysterious Land east of Libya or Persia till Alexander invaded India.

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому +2

      India has no relation to Ethiopia whatsoever.

    • @martinvanburen4578
      @martinvanburen4578 8 місяців тому

      "@SJking-gk4go
      1 day ago
      In ancient times, india was once known as Abyssinia, which was East Ethiopia. Two Ethiopias one west of red sea ,one east which is India. 😊"
      Uh, no it was never known as that.

    • @SJking-gk4go
      @SJking-gk4go 8 місяців тому

      @@martinvanburen4578 hey ..
      I think you didn't learn about your country..or is it being hidden.
      How can you convince me or the world. Shame...tch tch.

  • @makouras
    @makouras 8 місяців тому +3

    Turning to ancient roots is something that all nation states go through when nationalism takes a strong hold. It's been happening in the Balkans, it happened in Africa and it seems to be happening now in India.

    • @RR-pc7yv
      @RR-pc7yv 6 місяців тому

      In India, it is the revival of Indian civilizational consciousness and intensification of the mental decolonisation. That's all. It's a natural outcome of the discourse in India these days. Nothing negative.

    • @makouras
      @makouras 6 місяців тому

      @@RR-pc7yv Speaking from a Greek perspective, it's what's holding the country back. Tourism definitely benefits from that, but there is no innovation. And no critical view of history.
      I sincerely hope India fares better.

    • @RR-pc7yv
      @RR-pc7yv 6 місяців тому

      @@makouras What do you mean by 'holding the country back'? Are you saying this for India? How and on what basis you've come to conclude that India is not progressing? 🤨😕
      No body is changing the name of India. The Govt is just promoting the use of the other name which is Bharat. It is already written in the Article-1 of the Indian Constitution. This is nothing but just a social media rumour that India is changing its name to Bharat and dropping 'India', which is just pure BS.

    • @makouras
      @makouras 6 місяців тому

      @@RR-pc7yv probably my bad for not phrasing it right, but I'm talking about Greece. Turning to ancient roots is what's keeping Greece back.

    • @RR-pc7yv
      @RR-pc7yv 6 місяців тому +1

      @@makouras Ahh, ancient Greece still fascinates the whole world. It's good for tourism industry in Greece but how is it holding back Greece? What do you mean by critical view of Greek history in Greece? As far as I know, the modern Greeks are very very different from the Ancient Greeks when it comes almost all of the aspects. Like socio-culture, language differences,etc. And when Greeks fought against Ottomans for their freedom, they didn't gave a damn about the Ancient Greece and lacked consciousness for their ancient history. The primary factor was Orthodox Christianity, their shared Greek language and culture + their sufferings at the hands of the oppressive Sunni Isl@m!c Ottoman Turks,etc.

  • @Manu_Nayar
    @Manu_Nayar 8 місяців тому

    If you see all our Govt offices and buildings it’s says name board written “Bharat Sarkar “ means Govt Of India.
    Ie. Bharat Sarkar Akashvani

  • @sqrt2295
    @sqrt2295 8 місяців тому +1

    7:52 Funnily enough, India was indeed an island (or more accurately a subcontinent) until it collided with Eurasia around 55 million years ago.

  • @DamanLSun
    @DamanLSun 8 місяців тому +7

    I am from the North East of the country, I don't think the majority of us would be OK to be formally Identified as being from Bharat, I think most of us are absolutely OK with Hindi speaking people or anyone from the mainland to use the word Bharat to mean India but to change it, I don't think it is fair.
    the current way of naming is absolutely perfect "India that is Bharat/Bharat that is India.".

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 8 місяців тому +5

      Before 1970s, Not just North East India but the Entire South East Asian region was called "Indo - China", Do you know why ? It was home to Indian Culture. Indian Clture had extended as far as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. The Naga Tribes are mentioned in Ancient HIndu Scriptures as Great Warriors who worship the Serpent Dieties, Hene the Sanskrit name Naga. Arunachal Pradesh is called - Bheeshmaka, One of Ancient Kingdoms in Bhaarat which fought on the side of Pandavas in the Mahabhaarat War. Bangladesh was called Vanga, The Kingdom ruled by the famou King - Karna. These are all Histprical Facts but overtime, Foreign Invasions, Migrations from China and Tibet, Wiped out traces of our History.
      Today, We think of North Idnians as Outsiders or Migrants from Myanmar and China, This is not entirely the case. They are mixed race of Ancient Indians and the Latter, Just like how North Indians are also Mixed with Afghans, Turks and Arabs and so are South Indians who are mixed with African Traders and Oceanic Tribals. Example : Shiva worshipping South Indian HIndus have similartiies with Totem Pole worshipping Tribes of Mauri in New Zealand.

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому +1

      As an Indian Muslim, I also prefer retaining the name India. India is way more inclusive and promotes more harmony between people of different cultures and religions.

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому

      @@hindurashtra63 The name India will remain only

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому

      @@hindurashtra63 The name India will remain only

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 8 місяців тому

      ​​@@aasifazimabadi786as a Hindu I want the name Bharat as it is indigenous and has a history. India is diverse and secular because Hindus are in majority so we should respect the indigenous religion of the land .Muslims are outsiders who invaded India so we shouldn't really care about what they feel because they oppose anything not confirming to their dogmas.

  • @dwarasamudra8889
    @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +12

    Please don't refer to the Mughal Empire as a period of amazing religious tolerance. Apart from the reign of Emperor Akbar and Jahangir, the Mughal period was a time of religious persecution on the native Dharmic people with the forceful imposition of the foreign religion Islam, foreign language Persian, foreign Persian architecture etc. The Mughals, just like the British, were colonisers who had no intention in integrating into native Indian Dharmik societies. They destroyed many of India's most sacred temples and even changed the names of the holiest cities. For example, Varanasi was renamed Muhammadabad, Mathura became Islamabad, Nashik was named Gulshanabad, Prayaga was named Allahabad etc

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому

      Bro Mathura was called Islamabad?

    • @magma9000
      @magma9000 8 місяців тому +5

      Hindu nationalist propaganda 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @WastedBananas
      @WastedBananas 8 місяців тому +1

      They were Turko-Mongol not Pesian

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@based4560 yes Aurangzeb renamed both Varanasi and Mathura and other cities. None of them stuck though

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +4

      ​@@magma9000He changed the name of Mathura when he destroyed the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Temple aka the Keshav Rai Temple. It was one of the biggest and most important temples of India, it was as important for Hindus and Mecca is for Muslims or Vatican is for Christians. He changed the name of Varanasi when he destroyed the Shri Vishveshwara (Vishwanath) and Bindhu Madhav Temples of Varanasi, also extremely grand and sacred temples. On these sites, he built the Mathura Shahi Idgah, the Gyanvapi Mosque and the Alamgiri Mosque.

  • @rhythmkhandelwal2940
    @rhythmkhandelwal2940 8 місяців тому

    Thanks for showing the right map dude.

  • @jinroh516
    @jinroh516 8 місяців тому

    Meanwhile the Philippines does not have an Endonym or does it?

  • @alexrobi1176
    @alexrobi1176 8 місяців тому +3

    I don't like countries trying to change their names in other languages. Every language has a different name for every country so you can't force people to use different names.

    • @abhishekdasgupta9239
      @abhishekdasgupta9239 8 місяців тому +6

      That's true but the logic is somewhat inaccurate. In the same fashion, India can say that they don't like names attached with its colonial history or non-nativity and would like to discontinue its usage. It's like how bullies same you shitty nicknames in school, and not by your real name, and now you want them to stop calling him. Though I agree that India shouldn't drop the exonym for other reasons.

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому +1

      @@abhishekdasgupta9239 Are you insulting the name India? It is older than Britain as a whole historically just because you have this stigma doesn't mean the name will be changed. It's iconic

    • @abhishekdasgupta9239
      @abhishekdasgupta9239 8 місяців тому +2

      @deusmachinima1189 I tried giving an analogy to the situation he described in his comment, and by no means it's insulting the name of India. Technically, the name India is just all too simplistic in definition, but it became the identity of the land in modern times. Its upto the citizens of India to choose which name they wanna keep, and no foreign opinion shall dictate what India/Bharat wishes to change.

    • @eljanrimsa5843
      @eljanrimsa5843 8 місяців тому

      You can try. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. If you have good arguments, it usually works.

    • @atharvagawkar4827
      @atharvagawkar4827 8 місяців тому

      @@deusmachinima1189ahhh its citizen's right to choose what they want to call their nation isnt it? we speak english only formally and not in our day to day life, most of our native languages use term Bharat for it, our national anthem uses Bharat, the goddess who personifies our country is Bharat. Our constitution starts with 'india that is bharat'. (Bharat was used in older times too, Indonesian language 'bhasa' which has heavy indian influnce uses 'bharat' to indicate 'west'

  • @jaihind9462
    @jaihind9462 8 місяців тому +4

    I lost it when he said the mughal empire was a time of great religious tolerance 😹😹😹

  • @spilltea4241
    @spilltea4241 8 місяців тому +2

    Calling Mughal empire religiously tolerant is hilarious
    While Akbar was tolerant of non muslims, other mughal rulers had state religion and discriminatory policies against non muslims. Aurangzeb committed genocide and punished non muslim religious leaders

  • @tarunchhabria2196
    @tarunchhabria2196 8 місяців тому +1

    Update 05-Oct-2023: The name isn't changed. the special session was mostly about the women's reservation bill which will reserve 33% of parliament seats to women hoping to increase women's participation in parliament. The bill will take affect after Census and Delimitation (Increasing parliament seat in proportion to the overall population). on the matter of changing name....it is pretty much confirmed that the name india is not going away. we still called both India and Bharat.
    If you are reading this in the future.....hey man what's up how have things been?

    • @Krankenwagen571
      @Krankenwagen571 7 місяців тому

      Things are always the same as it always have been
      Shiity mindset of people.
      Full of chaos
      The country of snakes living among people

  • @parker4406
    @parker4406 8 місяців тому +3

    If you had done your research, ypu would've known that an indian cabinet minister has already rubbished those claims of replacement of India by Bharat.
    Officially and even in legal documents both names are mentioned, one in English - india and one in Hindi - bharat, side by side.
    The Indian government is already empowered to use Bharat in its official work aside from legal documents since independence so this whole 'new' change is not new at all.
    Further more, you are relying on rumours reported by news outlets and treating them as assertions wrt to the 'special session ' No basis
    in facts. Quite surprising coming from you.

    • @jl63023
      @jl63023 8 місяців тому

      But why the invitation and references to Bharat in English communications?

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому

      @@jl63023 Modi's agenda.

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 8 місяців тому

      @@jl63023 Modi's agenda.

    • @wonderworld7721
      @wonderworld7721 8 місяців тому

      @@deusmachinima1189 : *What and Why* ?..

  • @goddalehundibharathraj4374
    @goddalehundibharathraj4374 8 місяців тому +3

    The older name (before Bharat) is actually jambudweep. Used by Ashok.

  • @Do2mifasol-nh3lq
    @Do2mifasol-nh3lq 8 місяців тому

    In javanese kaladi inscription 906 CE wrote
    People of ariya dravidian pandhya Kling shinghala, Khmer Mon cham and hunjeman (Arab Persia Rom) are foreigners who must pay foreigners tax as workers or traders.
    In another inscription said there's many Brahmans from jambudwipa

  • @devil8877
    @devil8877 8 місяців тому

    Love from India 💯💞🙏🇮🇳

  • @ahwhite1398
    @ahwhite1398 8 місяців тому +5

    Will always be "Hindustan" to me.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому

      Ok

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому +1

      That's my favourite name for India too: Hindustan.
      ہندوستان / हिंदुस्तान

  • @sewerrat
    @sewerrat 8 місяців тому +6

    Mughal Empire and religious tolerance😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @MelissaThompson432
    @MelissaThompson432 8 місяців тому

    I knew someone who named his son Bharat, and I understand there are regional accents, but he pronounced it much different than the narrator.
    It sounded like Burrat, except the R was rolled and the second vowel was not fully pronounced.

  • @SpenserLi
    @SpenserLi 8 місяців тому +1

    Jambuvipa is not just India, but more like the name for the whole world that humans resides (as opposed to puravideha, aparagodaniya or uttarakuru)

  • @ayoubalrfadey3031
    @ayoubalrfadey3031 8 місяців тому +4

    Bharat is spices in arabic, I think that's interesting since it's the origin of spices

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому +2

      Assalam Alaykum. That is interesting, Ayoub, but that's not where the word comes from. Bahārāt actually comes from a Farsi word bahārبهار, meaning spring. Unfortunately, the sound that represents "bh" is not in Arabic (it's not in Farsi either, and it's actually found in most languages outside the Indian subcontinent), further adding to this confusion.
      This is bahar in Hindi: बहार. B is represented by ब
      This is Bharat in Hindi: भारत. Bh is represented by भ.
      For the Muslims of South Asia, we actually had to invent a new letter (technically digraph, but it's basically a letter) to represent this sound in the Urdu language, where we combine the ب and ھ.
      If you're wondering where Bhārat comes from, it's actually Hindu mythology - the name of a fictional family who fought great war in this epic called the "Māhābhārat." In Urdu, the name ہندوستان Hindustan was preferred. This is related to Al-Hind الهند. These names come from the Indus River, Hindustan literally meaning "land of the Indus River." Unfortunately, there is a political element to all this. A Hindu fundamentalist party wants to impose its ideology, and so they use this mythological reference. I wish it was about spices, but it's not. They even destroyed a famous masjid (the Babri masjid) in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh in the 90s because of this craze for mythology. I would rather the name India be retained, because I am from India's Muslim minority, and I find India to be a more inclusive name. Well, it was nice talking to you.

    • @nathanoyeght
      @nathanoyeght 8 місяців тому

      FYR, Ayodhya is relevant in Ramayana, not Mahabharata. The very fact you don't know the distinction while you call yourself from Indian Subcontinent shows your disgust and disdain to the non-Islamic history of the land. Imagine non-muslim Arabs calling stories of Mecca and Medina as mythology.
      In comparison, people from South-east Asia still incorporate elements of Ramayana and Mahabharata in their art, history, literature and place names (Ayutthaya in Thailand, for example).

    • @nathanoyeght
      @nathanoyeght 8 місяців тому +1

      There is a debate in linguistics where the name for Spices in Arabic is due to Bharat (name of the country of origin) or due to sea-trade product (I believe Al-Bahr mean sea in Arabic).
      It is definite, that Spring (Bahaar) is not one of the origination words, unlike what Mr Azimabadi thinks

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому

      @nathanoyeght5958 ​ Hey, Islamophobe! My mother was born in 1963 in Ara. I have the birth certificate from the Government of Bihar. My father was born in 1947 in Patna. Muslims are just as Indian as Hindus that are born in India. The BJP bastards are bulldozing Muslims' houses in the present in Haryana and U.P. Islamophobia is a very real problem in the present in India.

    • @aasifazimabadi786
      @aasifazimabadi786 8 місяців тому

      @@nathanoyeghtBefore you delete it, I want it documented for the record that you said "The very fact you don't know the distinction while you call yourself from Indian Subcontinent shows your disgust and disdain to the non-Islamic history of the land. Imagine non-muslim Arabs calling stories of Mecca and Medina as mythology." You cannot question my Indianness because I am not a Hindu, or I will call you an Islamophobe, Nathan.

  • @robertmiller9735
    @robertmiller9735 8 місяців тому +4

    Sounds like the politics of distraction to me: instead of working to solve actual problems, "look everybody! National pride!!"
    And the colonial name of the DRC was "Belgian Congo" (not Zaire), and boy do I understand why they got rid of that...

    • @scyber_avatar
      @scyber_avatar 8 місяців тому

      why assume "solving or practical problems" not happening ..
      why both things .. or all things can't happen simultaneously in parallel .. why your mind automatically thinkgs it should be either or

    • @robertmiller9735
      @robertmiller9735 8 місяців тому

      @@scyber_avatar Want some advice? Go to a community college and take a damn English 101 class.😠

    • @fattiesunite2288
      @fattiesunite2288 8 місяців тому

      Exactly. Nerendra modi is only doing this for votes

  • @daanishsumbre7171
    @daanishsumbre7171 8 місяців тому +2

    Just to be clear, The Mughals in their 250-300 years of actual rule, had no period of religious tolerance whatsoever.

    • @Cyclonixs
      @Cyclonixs 8 місяців тому

      Rulers like akbar did tolerate other religions.

    • @Your_real_dad
      @Your_real_dad 8 місяців тому

      ​@@Cyclonixsmodi=akbar= hypocrite 😂

  • @rodrigocarmona9827
    @rodrigocarmona9827 8 місяців тому

    Did they change the name of Taj Mahal?

  • @tommarney1561
    @tommarney1561 8 місяців тому +3

    The other day someone online insisted to me that India and the Indus River had nothing to do with each other and that there was no such thing as the Indus River anyway. I guess he didn't like having it pointed out that the Indus River lies entirely within Pakistan.

    • @biswaranjanmallick7407
      @biswaranjanmallick7407 8 місяців тому +1

      So what? It flows from India, if we build a dam on Indus river whole Pakistan will submerge.

    • @user-vy5uy9fo8p
      @user-vy5uy9fo8p 8 місяців тому +1

      Indus originates in Tibet, passes through India into Pakistan. So your point is moot and the gentleman who told you that Indus doesnt exist is a massive fool

  • @johnburnside7828
    @johnburnside7828 8 місяців тому +3

    Well, India WAS an island for quite a long while, before it finally smashed into Eurasia.

    • @EspeonMistress00
      @EspeonMistress00 8 місяців тому

      You could say that for a lot of places, what's your point

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +2

      I think he got the translation wrong. Dvipa does mean island but in this context, I think it means continent.

    • @burner555
      @burner555 8 місяців тому +1

      And it was united with Madagascar, Australia, Antarctica and African before that, so the point is null

    • @nathanoyeght
      @nathanoyeght 8 місяців тому

      Island/Isle - Dweepa
      Continent - Mahadweepa (Mega Island)
      Usage and meaning of Dweepa is not straightforward

  • @benw9949
    @benw9949 8 місяців тому +1

    In French, it's pronounced more like English "And" -- L'Inde -- in IPA /ẽnd/

  • @Not_Deb
    @Not_Deb 8 місяців тому +1

    Bharat is a Historical figure not a mythological one!

  • @CirclingDuck
    @CirclingDuck 8 місяців тому +5

    Historical India was mostly modern day Pakistan. When the Mughals and British ruled over the entire subcontinent, they called the whole place India. Then when they left, the areas that were never actually India before decided to keep the name.
    Bharat has a different but equally rich history. It should stand on its own two feet without needing to co-opt the name used for the western edge of the subcontinent.

    • @EspeonMistress00
      @EspeonMistress00 8 місяців тому +1

      A rich history that is seperate from south India but ok

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +10

      Nonsense. When foreigners, said India, Al Hind, Hindustan etc, they weren't just referring to the region the Sindhu river (modern day Pakistan). They were talking about the entire land beyond the Sindhu river which included the modern day Republic of India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh. The native names of Bharatvarsh and Jambudvipa also referred to the same territories.

    • @dwarasamudra8889
      @dwarasamudra8889 8 місяців тому +4

      ​@@EspeonMistress00as a South Indian, no idea what ur talking about when u say South India has a separate history

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +5

      Then why did megasthenes call places as far as Bihar India? And that was 300 BC mind you.

    • @based4560
      @based4560 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@dwarasamudra8889south India has a distinct but shared history with north India. Two things can be true at once.

  • @konycurrentyear7053
    @konycurrentyear7053 8 місяців тому +7

    I dislike countries insisting English speakers use their preferred chosen exonyms.

    • @karaqakkzl
      @karaqakkzl 8 місяців тому +2

      Then what do you want and why?

    • @konycurrentyear7053
      @konycurrentyear7053 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@karaqakkzl Native English speakers to be allowed to use our desired endonyms for other places. And because why not?

    • @kapoioBCS
      @kapoioBCS 8 місяців тому +3

      @@konycurrentyear7053and it is always some middle or west Asia country. No Finnish people want to be called in the english language as Suomi etc

  • @johndelong5574
    @johndelong5574 8 місяців тому

    Bar =son At =8. The rishis that escaped the global flood. Manu (noah) and his family were 8 people. The number of new beginnings is 8 in gematria.

  • @susanp5393
    @susanp5393 8 місяців тому

    Hindustan which means the state of the Hindis is the Persian name for the country, as northern India was rules by Persian rulers or Persian speaking Mungul rulers for many centuries. The present day Hindi language has lots of Persian vocabulary, and also north Indian cuisine has a great influence of Persian cuisine.