Don't need more then 5 when they got more nukes then the USA. Think about that, also they got Hyper-sonic missiles which the USA can't make. The USA makes junk and has done for 70 years think about WW2 just make it cheap and nasty, were the Russians makes fast planes and make em out of Steel ie MIG25/31. When was the last time the US actually won a war, Korea ===Draw (still technically going) , Vietnam ==Lost, Iraq (gulf 1) Saddam still was in power so I call that loss, Iraq 2 Well that dragged out to be costly and just nothing, Afghanistan well 20 years and Yanks went home so that is a loss. Now Putin ignores the USA because its weak, they(USA) is full of empowered gender fluid types with purple hair running the show.
@@ntal5859 ooh looks like the Russian trolls are getting angry. Pretty sure America was able to land a man on the moon; a technological feat the USSR was never able to achieve. Also, you guys lost in afganistan too. It’s sad when you have to compare you enemies to he most vulnerable in society to feel powerful. But let’s be real, if you are dick-measuring nuke stockpiles you have a very stunted understanding of geopolitics.
Think you fail to realise that it is only helping China and doesnt make a difference to Putin or russia as many none European countries will continue to boost the Russian economy and China's by proxy 🤷♂️
Yah, doubtful even more than handful of this so called "Checkmate" actually get built at this point. Sourcing tech components is gonna be a lot tougher with sanctions in place, let alone financing them.
So stealthy we have only seen it in press releases and yet to see it in combat. The F-117 was so stealthy nobody knew it existed until it started dropping bombs. One of these aircraft were the cutting edge and a real secret weapon for a confident military. The other is saber rattling and salesmanship.
Please let's stop giving us Janus-faced reporting on the subject of a Russian Jetfighter referred to as the “CHECKMATE” that is supported to be equivalent to the American jet fighter the “F-35”. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Truth, The 'CHECKMATE” Russian proposed 6th generation fighter jet is just a proposal still on paper, and the pictures of the plane are enhanced images of a “WOODEN” mach up of what the Jet is may look like whenever it may be built, and experts say that won't be for another ten years before that happens. Let's get it right next time.
@@kawkaw8623 By 1999 the F117A was based on technology so outdated the wreck wasn't considered worthwhile to bomb to prevent capture. It was on airshow circuits. But sure, Serbia stronk memes, knock yourself out.
@@kawkaw8623 Russia is only good on paper, already 17,000 dead. More than Americans dead in 20 years of occupying iraq and Afghanistan. The entire Russian nation is garbage.
Believe it when I see it. The presentation literally was buzzword bingo of every wish list item possible. So, to get it all at that price, I am not holding my breath...
The Su-75 is only vaporware at this point. Russia has managed to produce only a dozen Su-57s. Mostly due to the cost of the Su-57. Russia is hoping for significant pre-orders on the Su-75 so as to finance it's final development and construction of prototypes. I predict that if they do not get enough pre-orders, this bird will never fly off the computer screen.
Also, since Putin has decided to be an absolute idiot and invade Ukraine, the chances of the Su-75 being anything more than vaporware are so small as to be indistinguishable from ZERO. F-35s anyone?
Russia's best move would be to upgrade the FoxBat. They already have 110 in service. 2nd highest ceiling rate next to the SR 71. During trial it reached a speed of Mach 3.2! If they were to add upgraded state-of-the-art Avionics and weapons they'd be better off then building the checkmate. At least they would have 110, and not 5 prototypes like every other project they come up with! They simply don't have the funding.
@@jonbarad1 It's worse than that. As the Invasion of Ukraine has proved to everyone, corruption is severe and widespread in Russia. So what they do spend on their military, a very significant amount is diverted into the pockets of corrupt officials before it can actually do anything.
Russia has the highest quality CGI jet fighters in the world. They've taken the the best parts of the f22, and the f35, thrown in a bit of the Rebels X-Wing, and a pinch of Viper, from Battlestar Galactica. They've also installed phasers and hyperdrive. At least they'll be safe if the Cylons or the Empire suddenly attack. In him I sense much fear in him. Darth Putin, to the dark side, he has turned.
Did ya not see Putin standing there in person presenting it? It’s not even that impressive compared to black world air/spacecraft that both sides actually have, this is what you’re allowed to know about. Imagine what stays classified, I’ve seen a silently hovering black triangle spacecraft before, it’s like Ben Rich from the Skunkworks said “if you’ve seen tech in Star Wars or Star Trek we’ve either done it, did it better, or said it wasn’t worth doing”…
You do realise stealth planes kind of all look similar because there stealth... And Russia knows how to build planes .... Why this is a bit of propaganda if you were in an f35 snd your long range missles miss and you suddenly realise your in a dogfight with an su35 your going to shit yourself
@@HubertofLiege well missles do miss and planes have countermeasures .. So its a liekly scenario even at 100km range this gives the person that just fired his missle very little time to work out his next move if the plane he was attacking countermeasures work ... Also the other plane would know the f35 is there once the f35 attempts to radar lock to fire a missle... So your stealth somewhat becomes less effective
@@MegaRyan123456 Any pilot that underestimates Fat Amy's tech advantages won't live to regret doing so. I suggest you learn a tad more about both Fat Amy and aerial combat. Fat Amy is a strike fighter, designed to kill high value air defense sites. She's only supposed to defend herself while doing her job. Two Su35s were taken out by an out of date MiG-29 today and you're going around crowing about the Su-35's abilities against Fat Amy? kek
It will be cheap because instead of plane they just need to fill pockets of all corrupted politicians and oligarchs... The plane will obviously never be...
“If the information that the Russians have provided is accurate….” That tells you what you need to know. Not impressed. The Fulcrum was supposed to be an F-16 F-18 analog and fell short in construction, capability, and engine life. This is the the same.
@@jeffreyprezalar220 Missile tech has nothing to do with the aircraft, and to the other point: A Mig-29 has never shot down a single aircraft ever, and has a very small fuel tank. And nowadays its not even a comparison
@@jeffreyprezalar220 f16 is the most maneuverable jet on the planet capable of 12g turns. Also has better avionics and missile systems. F16 and f15s have smoked mig 29 and su27 in combat every time.
Please let's stop giving us Janus-faced reporting on the subject of a Russian Jetfighter referred to as the “CHECKMATE” that is supported to be equivalent to the American jet fighter the “F-35”. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Truth, The 'CHECKMATE” Russian proposed 6th generation fighter jet is just a proposal still on paper, and the pictures of the plane are enhanced images of a “WOODEN” mach up of what the Jet is may look like whenever it may be built, and experts say that won't be for another ten years before that happens. Let's get it right next time.
@@justinlance4174 lmao 12 g turns? Is that why the airframe is only rated for -3/+9? I love the F-16 but it is definitely not the most maneuverable aircraft in the world, just extremely capable.
Su-75 may come around in time when the US starts testing its new 4th gen complement to F-35 as the Joint Strike Fighter project failed to be an F-16 replacement due to high cost, Russians are more likely to succeed by not following beyond good enough concept that is necessary to keep in mind in order to be operable in sufficient numbers.. It's still plausible that the US chooses to complement the F-35 with a new production of more upgraded existing 4th gens (F-15,16,18) but there are already available concept arts of the upcoming F-36 "Kingsnake" delta wing single engine jet fighter under development to chase lost civilian Cessnas in forbidden US air space instead of "overqualified" F-35 which would likely still lose at least in nowadays less likely close range dogfight against upcoming Russian light to medium weight thrust vectoring capable 5th gen jet. Contrary to popular belief, F-35 is not cutting edge because it has to be mass produced and export friendly, unlike F/A-22 which is forbidden to export by the US law, but F-35 is still a better multirole solution than anything competition offers while currently still decent for air dominance, not that there is much of 5th gen multirole competition until the arrival of next-gen European fighters anyway as Russia/China heavy jets are air dominance/anti-shipping oriented, so not exactly super useful for low-intensity conflicts as we got in the 21st century...
@@icantseethis Americans (typically latinx too for some reason) came out of the woodwork to slander Russians in every video now that CNN told them too. While the rest of us that have always had this interest in warfare have to watch all your cringe takes on these videos
Yup same problems with all those programs. They haven't been built in any meaningful numbers. They only managed to deliver about 20 T-14 Armata's by the end of 2021, and there's like 4 production versions of the SU-57 (and 10 test aircraft).
Likely won't happen now. Given that Russia's economy is about to tank in the next couple of weeks and months. With no money and the current invasion on a country likely to go bad. The Checkmate will likely never see the light of day as a fighter. In russia at least.
@@RuskFox Russia is calling conscription of its civilian population and thousands of Russian citizens are fleeing the country as we speak. Ukraine is breaking Russian lines and Putin has been showing signs of breaking. Yeah that economy is indeed going to bust. The current invasion in Ukraine is sure going badly. Yeah the Checkmate fighter will likely never see the light of day as a fighter. In Russia at least So sorry but I don't have to take the words of a little russian fox..
America makes a “stealth” fighter that has the radar cross-section of a large bee. Russia builds a “stealth” fighter and it has the radar cross-section of… a slightly smaller airplane.
Common misconception.. it has a small cross section to narrow wave target acquisition RADARs. It is still very trackable with broad waveform RADAR platforms, albeit at a reduced distance. An AWACS or flight control RADAR has no problem tracking it or the 22 at all for the most part. The problem is those RADARs are imprecise and are not good enough to guide weapons. Also have to remember the 22 and 35 are front aspect stealth only, if looking at them any other way, they are very easy to lock on to. .. well the 35 is, the 22 has a better overall stealth employment. Other than the frontal plane, the aircraft would be closer to "reduced Signature" than stealth. The only true all aspect stealth aircraft the US currently employs is the B-2 and even that is only at standoff ranges, if it gets too close that broad underside will light up targeting RADARs like a Christmas tree.
They said the same kind of stuff about the MiG-25 too. It was supposed to be a Mach 3.2 super plane that would swat F-15's out of the sky. It was only when the West got their hands on an actual example did it become clear that the plane didn't even begin to deliver on all the hype. I suspect that the same thing will turn out to the case here as well.
They actually never said that ... The west saw the plane and thought that ... The plane was only ever designed and intended as a fast interceptor... The west saw it and made up ideas in there own head
@@MegaRyan123456 I disagree sir, "The West did not make those ideas up in their collective minds". Russian aircraft have lagged behind "The West's" aircraft by a margin of two to three decades since WWII. Mig 29 and Su 27 entered service in the early to mid nineteen eighties over a decade plus some after "The West" had F15 and F16 in service. The YF 22 and YF 23 programs Fourth generation aircraft were in development and flight testing already by 1990 before the Soviet union dissolved. The "Checkmate" aircraft recently revealed and hyped up by Russia is lackluster compared to the 30 year old American airframe design that new Checkmate was engineered to compare and counter. Maybe Russia can park the Checkmate where that Space Shuttle knockoff languishes when it fails.
@@willardhunghimself there space shuttle is not a knock off its a space shuttle there all going to look the same ... Its a very different vehicle to the American space shuttle.. It just happeneds that vehicles made to do a similar job kind of look the same ...
@@MegaRyan123456 Yo the Buran is a Copy cat of the STS bud make no mistake it is a Copy Cat Buran shows up almost ten years after STS 5 in 1981 the first operational service flight, but Enterprise STS1 was built in the 70s . I know what your trying to say bud but your wrong homie. My entire family worked in Aerospace and Military Aircraft. My Grandfather was a Lead Flight line mechanic for Convair, Rockwell International, and Boeing' Rocket Dyne Division. I have sat in in the pilots seat of two STS. . My point is this dude Russian aircraft are always decades behind US literally., Buran shows up ten years after STS makes 1 L E O with 2 orbits and that's all, the Tupolev Tu160 in 1981a Copy of the B1A that flew in 1975, The Tu 144 is just a Concord rip off it came out after Concord, and the list goes on man. Shit shows up later, Touted as superior, and always ends being a inferior knock off of a pre existing aircraft.
That doesn't look ripped off at all... If the pilots are the same as the ones flying over Ukraine, though, we don't have to worry about the Russian Air Force, stealth fighters or not.
@@TheBinaryHappiness Assume much? I'm not worried about Russia's stealth fighters. I'm relatively sure that the US has the ability to track stealth fighters as easy as you please, given that they've been developing stealth aircraft for decades now.
They've been doing the same thing since 1945. Once, they built a bunch of bombers out of plywood to make it look as if they had many squadarns of long range heavy bombers. Yes, we paniced.
😐And who did they choose to have a cold war with? _The World_ . I don't know if you're a fan of history or not, but the more I hear about this "Putin", the less I care for him...
@@snickle1980 I've always loved history. The important part, I've been able to learn new things that I didn't know, and do the same for others. Putin's problem- he's still KGB. Like some U.S. Marines, it never left him. He may be picking the most valuable assets to bring back into a new USSR. I've never trusted a word he's ever said. Cool as a cucumber. He could beat any polygraph test in the world. Been in power way too long.
I've a sneaking suspicion demand for Russian export market junk will be a bit depressed for the next few years, even if they were to somehow turn this specific piece of vaporware into a somewhat flyable aircraft.
We also know that Russia exagger………..uhm……. Lies about the capability they have achieved. How many time have plane and other device not lived up to the Russian hype. I am not say these are not deadly planes I am simply pointing out the history of what is said to reality. Will be interested in see if it as good as they say. I won’t hold my breath
Russia has around a dozen stealth aircraft in its inventory in various states of readiness. In the next decade or so the US will have nearly 4000. Good luck Russia.
Although superficially the Checkmate seems to look like a "Stealth" fighter, it has a number of shape flaws that would reflect radar. Maybe they are overcoming these with RAM or maybe this is just a crude prototype for public display but I see things in the body shape, wheel and weapons bay doors and other issues that would not be as stealthy as the F-35 or F-22 (even with only using internal weapons). Plus it is anyone's guess about the sensors, computer, and network abilities. I doubt it would stand up as an equivalent to the 22 and 35. But it might be a low cost good fighter, just not really stealth or 5 gen.
it's intentional. the more you focus on stealth capability, the more $$$ you will have to pay which defeats purpose of a massively affordable fighter and real world practicality. Think of it this way: The difference of detection range(front aspect) between 0.01m2 RCS and 0.001m2 RCS is only a measly 10NM with L-band radars and 25 NM with 0.0001m2 which means you don't really get much for what you pay for as you make the RCS of an aircraft smaller. It's much cheaper and smarter to develop stand off capability with longer range munitions than spend stupid amounts of money on diminishing returns. Higher stealth performance also requires more maintenance cost and hours because RAM is notorious for degrading quickly as you increase flight envelope. For example the F-22 requires a minimum of 30 hours of maintenance for every hour of flight time so it stands that potential customers would want a fighter that they can operate more in the air than spend in the hangar.
Those exact shape flaws also exist in F-35. In fact, if you simulate RCS on both mid and long wave for F-35 vs J-31, you'll see that J-31 is pretty much a corrected version with F-35's worst RCS flaws ironed out. The problem with this is, it didn't correct these flaws. It wasn't as if Lockheed Martin didn't realize, but rather that they had no choice, given the requirements sat for them. We don't know the requirements sat for the Russian project, but vertical takeoff probably isn't one of them, nor is cramming in entire specialized ecm suite or command and control model while maintaining single engline configuration, resulting in an overweight underpowered potato. No excuse, unless this is just a hoax meant to waste our tax dollars on extra spending to counter it.
@@wiker680 It's possible. Russia's limited military spending can be better spent elsewhere. Even today, they don't have proper stealth coating. You'd think they wouldn't divert resources from that to a whole new plane that, too, won't have coating to use. Then there's the problem with single engine configuration. Developing the new large single engine will take extra, when 2 existing engine will do. A lot of this doesn't make sense. It's too similar to the F-35 that they don't need and can't afford.
If it's anything like other recent aircraft, Putin will order a half dozen and end up with maybe 2 in service flying at airshows and demand unattainable cost reductions for future orders.
Because they both play catch up, stealing info and ideas. It's hilarious when you hear them spout crap about being superior. Nevermind all they will be able to make soon is ww1 style by-planes.
That's very ignorant to say. Firstly obviously, there's only a few ways to make a proper airplane. Secondly, Russians have made fair share of real innovative contributions to Fighter aircrafts industry. Chinese initially started with reverse engineering Russian aircrafts but now they have learned and improved a lot, to the point that they are now producing their own designs
@@SWRaptor1 The shape helps maintain proper airflow to the inlet. The inside of an f-16 intake is similar and the variable ramps on the f-15 perform the same function.
The Russian arms industry is in deep trouble. It has huge debts even after Putin wrote off a significant amount of it! The average age of an engineer in the arms industry over 50 in Russia. Engineers are retiring faster that they can be replaced. The pay is also fairly low. There is also a lack of skilled workers, and because of low pay there isn't enough entering it. The prospects are not good.
Its a new version of the YF-23. Look that up. They contracted with foreign countries to help them build their jets, after losing the contract to the F-35.
@@kylecarnine537 The YF-23 is... Very far different in design, Twin Engines, extremely low profile, centerline fuselage weapon bays, Diamond Wings. The Checkmate is most similar to the X-32 Prototype (Albeit sleeker and less obese.)
You would think one of the main advantages to UAV is that it doesnt have to take human limitations (amount of G-force, heat, and pressure) into account. This is slower and less maneuverable than the manned f 35 that isnt made for dog fighting (we have much better for that). Yes cheaper so can swarm in numbers but not a top of line weapon.
For me, it would be like easy bots you find in multiplayer games.. It's just that, could it even keep up with the ever-changing tactics of the battlefield? (No constant moves)
It’s faster than the F-35 but as the USAF found with the F-22, flying above Mach 1.4 significantly increases the thermal signature of the aircraft which makes it much easier to spot for IR weapons. This is why they reduced the top speed of the F-22 and made it so that the F-35 wouldn’t go as fast either.
Russia is quite poor. And the money they have from oil and gas goes to the elite. The army is great in numbers but their equipment is shit. The size of their economy is that of Belgium and Netherlands combined. So yes, this is all smoke and mirrors. (and always have been)
it looks like from the overhead thumbnail image, they added Elevators (or possible tail stabilizers) to the rear of the plane. Meaning they're having stability and maneuverability issues with the aircraft already. Their "Ruddervator" just isnt big enough to handle the stress or performance that this aircraft wants to produce.
Aeroflot has a fleet of about 60 Boeing and 120 Airbus jets. They also have 10 Sukhoi Superjets that no one else wanted to buy. Russia's state airline won't buy Russian airplanes, so I doubt that Russia's air force, which doesn't get a choice, really has planes that are as superior as they are bragging about.
The Boeing and Airbus jets will have to land very soon. If they are leased they have to be returned and if not they will stop operating very fast anyway because they need constant supply of replacement parts and maintenance that only the original companies can provide.
F-22 is being retired in 2030 because F-35 is more capable and can establish air superiority on its own. And once air superiority is established, specialized aircraft like the F-22 are relatively useless as the majority of the war becomes ground attack and CAS.
All of Russia's sexy military toys seem to have a LOT more hype than practical effectiveness. Russia still doesn't have air superiority in Ukraine, their military seems to be a joke
When the teaser tweet was released, I honestly thought it was some type of new ARG having to do with the Black Knight Satellite. 'Cause, you know, it was a black knight chess piece, on top of a UFO.
Russia: builds a new brand new 5th gen Stealth fighter Also Russia: losses their best ship in the black sea named after their capital to a country without no navy.
I see what they want is to sell this damn thing....... BUT after Ukraine I don't see many countries being interested, then you have to think with the ridiculous amount of sanctions how can they build a sufficient number to sell.....
It’s all just bluster. It’s not in the class of an F35, not even close. With all the orders and all the optimizing and streamlining that comes with mass producing, and the lowest we can get the F35’s cost down to is $78M, there’s no way Russia’s gonna offer anything similar for the low $30’s. It’ll be an F35 shaped griffon with a stealth coating applied to the surface on the front. The F35’s biggest advantage is it’s sensors, avionics, and massive computing capabilities. It’s got the aviation industry’s first quantum computer. Get real.
The f35 does not have an quantum computer 🤣 You could not even fit a useful one in the airframe with all the cooling requirements a quantum processor needs The processors inside a f35 will be 10 year old military rated arm or x86 processors made for reliability and mission critical applications Try not to be a bullshit artist 🤣
@@MegaRyan123456 I don’t know you, but if you say you deal in bullshit, I suppose I must believe you, yes? I saw it in the airplane. I read the label, it said, “D-wave.” I researched it, and not only has the Pentagon been using them, they must be impressed, because they are buying the D-wave 2, that is set to come out, if not already. D-wave has published its research in scientific periodicals. NASA,Google, and another large space program are all making purchases. Just Google D-wave. There is so much to the F35, that other countries posing and claiming any equivalence to the F35 is laughable.
If any of you have seen the Ukraine debacle, Russia?, stealth? With 25,000+ casualties they need stealth soldiers. I don't believe they have capable crews to operate any of the new military weapons they have acquired. If so, why did they deploy WW2 weapons(T72- tanks?) in a 2022 conflict? or, when are they going to bring the new toys out?
Folks who think the intake area is too small should have a look at the intake on the MiG-21. The air is compressed before it enters. In the case of the MiG-21 it was the nose cone which did it. In the case of the Su-75, it's ...
only one version of the Lightning II, the F-35B, is built with that capability, the rest require a standard take-off method. remove that variant from the comparison and the Checkmate still costs less than half as much as all the example competitors this video mentions, except for the JAS-35E.
A 10 is a great ground attack aircraft but dog fighting isn't its strong point.... F-16 on the other hand or anything else after that is another issue but honestly Russia hasn't had aircraft capable of competing with the best of the USAF since Vietnam and in my opinion they still won't after the "Checkmate" is released.
@ TONY Malloy I agree ☝🏻 but was making a joke 🇺🇸😎😂😂😂😂🍻🍻🍻 thanks & cheers ! “ the Conrad’s are a bunch of drunks n my point was our smaller assets could handle em 🙄😊
Some US fighter pilots have done videos on this jet and are all saying a lot of its tech and abilities are same as any 4th Gen jet but a lot claimed aren’t possible. They state speed AND range can’t physically be possible with even the “still to come saturn “ engine , the price they say us wayyyyy off IF it’s going to have the abilities they claim ,..remember the F35 thst was suppose to be $75M per jet came much higher initially but once ramped up in production the standard is now $80M not 130 as you stated. That was the B model and cost when they first came out , they’ve dropped as much as $40M per jet since then.
... The F-35 is a multi-roll stealth fighter. its suppose to put as much power into fighting land targets as all other areas. and i did NOT seen any kind of targeting pod for the Su-75 here. the F-35 uses a AN/AAQ-40 built in targeting pod. The Su-57 is supposedly ALSO a multi-roll fighter. rather than just being a air-superiority fighter with ground attack ability like the F-22, the Su-57 also lacks targeting pods. hell not even that, why is it using an IRST so big still? the F-35 uses a 360 degree IRST, AN/AAQ-37. This isnt 'near-pier' tech, and as we see in Ukraine, they dont want to compete. just cause trouble.
If they manage to build as many of these as they did of their "next generation" tank, the Armata, they'll end up having a whole... 5.
🤣🤣🤣
Don't need more then 5 when they got more nukes then the USA. Think about that, also they got Hyper-sonic missiles which the USA can't make. The USA makes junk and has done for 70 years think about WW2 just make it cheap and nasty, were the Russians makes fast planes and make em out of Steel ie MIG25/31. When was the last time the US actually won a war, Korea ===Draw (still technically going) , Vietnam ==Lost, Iraq (gulf 1) Saddam still was in power so I call that loss, Iraq 2 Well that dragged out to be costly and just nothing, Afghanistan well 20 years and Yanks went home so that is a loss. Now Putin ignores the USA because its weak, they(USA) is full of empowered gender fluid types with purple hair running the show.
And yet, we're still so powerful, we let a puppet lead our country.
Exactly, Russian design is up to par, their budget is tiny
@@ntal5859 ooh looks like the Russian trolls are getting angry. Pretty sure America was able to land a man on the moon; a technological feat the USSR was never able to achieve. Also, you guys lost in afganistan too. It’s sad when you have to compare you enemies to he most vulnerable in society to feel powerful.
But let’s be real, if you are dick-measuring nuke stockpiles you have a very stunted understanding of geopolitics.
It's a good thing their economy isn't going to collapse or anything so this cool project will be successful. Oh..wait...
I'd rather never see this thing in the air.
Think you fail to realise that it is only helping China and doesnt make a difference to Putin or russia as many none European countries will continue to boost the Russian economy and China's by proxy 🤷♂️
Yah, doubtful even more than handful of this so called "Checkmate" actually get built at this point. Sourcing tech components is gonna be a lot tougher with sanctions in place, let alone financing them.
Did North Koreas much smaller economy collapsed?
@@julwiezdeghorz5089
No but at the end of the day “their still just little North Korea” enough said 😏
So stealthy we have only seen it in press releases and yet to see it in combat. The F-117 was so stealthy nobody knew it existed until it started dropping bombs. One of these aircraft were the cutting edge and a real secret weapon for a confident military. The other is saber rattling and salesmanship.
Please let's stop giving us Janus-faced reporting on the subject of a Russian Jetfighter referred to as the “CHECKMATE” that is supported to be equivalent to the American jet fighter the “F-35”. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Truth, The 'CHECKMATE” Russian proposed 6th generation fighter jet is just a proposal still on paper, and the pictures of the plane are enhanced images of a “WOODEN” mach up of what the Jet is may look like whenever it may be built, and experts say that won't be for another ten years before that happens. Let's get it right next time.
it was stealthy untill the serbs took some down
@@kawkaw8623 By 1999 the F117A was based on technology so outdated the wreck wasn't considered worthwhile to bomb to prevent capture. It was on airshow circuits. But sure, Serbia stronk memes, knock yourself out.
@@kawkaw8623 Russia is only good on paper, already 17,000 dead. More than Americans dead in 20 years of occupying iraq and Afghanistan. The entire Russian nation is garbage.
@@NikovK i mean the main cause of them getting shot down was cause the americans used the same flight pattern in all bombing runs
Believe it when I see it. The presentation literally was buzzword bingo of every wish list item possible. So, to get it all at that price, I am not holding my breath...
You can't see it... it's stealth ;-)
The Su-75 is only vaporware at this point. Russia has managed to produce only a dozen Su-57s. Mostly due to the cost of the Su-57. Russia is hoping for significant pre-orders on the Su-75 so as to finance it's final development and construction of prototypes. I predict that if they do not get enough pre-orders, this bird will never fly off the computer screen.
Let me clarify, it's a smart move by Russia, just don't inflate it to be anything more than it actually is at the moment.
Also, since Putin has decided to be an absolute idiot and invade Ukraine, the chances of the Su-75 being anything more than vaporware are so small as to be indistinguishable from ZERO. F-35s anyone?
Russia's best move would be to upgrade the FoxBat. They already have 110 in service. 2nd highest ceiling rate next to the SR 71. During trial it reached a speed of Mach 3.2! If they were to add upgraded state-of-the-art Avionics and weapons they'd be better off then building the checkmate. At least they would have 110, and not 5 prototypes like every other project they come up with! They simply don't have the funding.
True, stealth is a rich mans game and Russia is poor...
@@jonbarad1 It's worse than that. As the Invasion of Ukraine has proved to everyone, corruption is severe and widespread in Russia. So what they do spend on their military, a very significant amount is diverted into the pockets of corrupt officials before it can actually do anything.
Russia has the highest quality CGI jet fighters in the world. They've taken the the best parts of the f22, and the f35, thrown in a bit of the Rebels X-Wing, and a pinch of Viper, from Battlestar Galactica. They've also installed phasers and hyperdrive. At least they'll be safe if the Cylons or the Empire suddenly attack. In him I sense much fear in him. Darth Putin, to the dark side, he has turned.
Did ya not see Putin standing there in person presenting it? It’s not even that impressive compared to black world air/spacecraft that both sides actually have, this is what you’re allowed to know about. Imagine what stays classified, I’ve seen a silently hovering black triangle spacecraft before, it’s like Ben Rich from the Skunkworks said “if you’ve seen tech in Star Wars or Star Trek we’ve either done it, did it better, or said it wasn’t worth doing”…
You do realise stealth planes kind of all look similar because there stealth...
And Russia knows how to build planes ....
Why this is a bit of propaganda if you were in an f35 snd your long range missles miss and you suddenly realise your in a dogfight with an su35 your going to shit yourself
@@MegaRyan123456 ha. You said miss.
@@HubertofLiege well missles do miss and planes have countermeasures ..
So its a liekly scenario even at 100km range this gives the person that just fired his missle very little time to work out his next move if the plane he was attacking countermeasures work ...
Also the other plane would know the f35 is there once the f35 attempts to radar lock to fire a missle...
So your stealth somewhat becomes less effective
@@MegaRyan123456 Any pilot that underestimates Fat Amy's tech advantages won't live to regret doing so. I suggest you learn a tad more about both Fat Amy and aerial combat. Fat Amy is a strike fighter, designed to kill high value air defense sites. She's only supposed to defend herself while doing her job. Two Su35s were taken out by an out of date MiG-29 today and you're going around crowing about the Su-35's abilities against Fat Amy? kek
There is no way it is that cheap if all the technology is in place.
Kid: Mommy I wanna f 35
Mother: we have f-35 at home
This
Probably made from some plastic but even then, the radar signature is big.
It will be cheap because instead of plane they just need to fill pockets of all corrupted politicians and oligarchs... The plane will obviously never be...
Cheaper than F-35. US costs, labor, logistics, corruption much higher
@@AccordGTR the f-35 is more expensive because it actually exists. More on paper projects from Russia.
“If the information that the Russians have provided is accurate….” That tells you what you need to know. Not impressed. The Fulcrum was supposed to be an F-16 F-18 analog and fell short in construction, capability, and engine life. This is the the same.
The mig 29 at the time of its release was way ahead of f16 and 18s in maneuvering, missile tech and overall speed especially the real soviet versions.
@@jeffreyprezalar220 Missile tech has nothing to do with the aircraft, and to the other point: A Mig-29 has never shot down a single aircraft ever, and has a very small fuel tank. And nowadays its not even a comparison
@@jeffreyprezalar220 f16 is the most maneuverable jet on the planet capable of 12g turns. Also has better avionics and missile systems. F16 and f15s have smoked mig 29 and su27 in combat every time.
Please let's stop giving us Janus-faced reporting on the subject of a Russian Jetfighter referred to as the “CHECKMATE” that is supported to be equivalent to the American jet fighter the “F-35”. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Truth, The 'CHECKMATE” Russian proposed 6th generation fighter jet is just a proposal still on paper, and the pictures of the plane are enhanced images of a “WOODEN” mach up of what the Jet is may look like whenever it may be built, and experts say that won't be for another ten years before that happens. Let's get it right next time.
@@justinlance4174 lmao 12 g turns? Is that why the airframe is only rated for -3/+9? I love the F-16 but it is definitely not the most maneuverable aircraft in the world, just extremely capable.
Not much is known about this jet due to the time-honored practice of it not existing.
Su-75 may come around in time when the US starts testing its new 4th gen complement to F-35 as the Joint Strike Fighter project failed to be an F-16 replacement due to high cost, Russians are more likely to succeed by not following beyond good enough concept that is necessary to keep in mind in order to be operable in sufficient numbers..
It's still plausible that the US chooses to complement the F-35 with a new production of more upgraded existing 4th gens (F-15,16,18) but there are already available concept arts of the upcoming F-36 "Kingsnake" delta wing single engine jet fighter under development to chase lost civilian Cessnas in forbidden US air space instead of "overqualified" F-35 which would likely still lose at least in nowadays less likely close range dogfight against upcoming Russian light to medium weight thrust vectoring capable 5th gen jet.
Contrary to popular belief, F-35 is not cutting edge because it has to be mass produced and export friendly, unlike F/A-22 which is forbidden to export by the US law, but F-35 is still a better multirole solution than anything competition offers while currently still decent for air dominance, not that there is much of 5th gen multirole competition until the arrival of next-gen European fighters anyway as Russia/China heavy jets are air dominance/anti-shipping oriented, so not exactly super useful for low-intensity conflicts as we got in the 21st century...
American exceptionalism and its consequences have been a disaster for the warfare community
@@WeAreSoBackBros how is that a reply to what I said?
Good 1
@@icantseethis Americans (typically latinx too for some reason) came out of the woodwork to slander Russians in every video now that CNN told them too. While the rest of us that have always had this interest in warfare have to watch all your cringe takes on these videos
Just like the su57,t-14 and the "we aren't going to invade Ukraine".
Yup same problems with all those programs. They haven't been built in any meaningful numbers. They only managed to deliver about 20 T-14 Armata's by the end of 2021, and there's like 4 production versions of the SU-57 (and 10 test aircraft).
You forgot the unlimited range missile that crashed after a few miles.
@@DroneStrike1776 not familiar with those other than the nuclear powered one that crashed and they tried to hide It.
Likely won't happen now. Given that Russia's economy is about to tank in the next couple of weeks and months. With no money and the current invasion on a country likely to go bad. The Checkmate will likely never see the light of day as a fighter.
In russia at least.
Aged very poorly, cope.
@@RuskFox Russia is calling conscription of its civilian population and thousands of Russian citizens are fleeing the country as we speak. Ukraine is breaking Russian lines and Putin has been showing signs of breaking.
Yeah that economy is indeed going to bust.
The current invasion in Ukraine is sure going badly.
Yeah the Checkmate fighter will likely never see the light of day as a fighter.
In Russia at least
So sorry but I don't have to take the words of a little russian fox..
America makes a “stealth” fighter that has the radar cross-section of a large bee. Russia builds a “stealth” fighter and it has the radar cross-section of… a slightly smaller airplane.
The stealth fighter is SO advanced, that you can't see a single Russian soldier around Kiev! Wow.
Common misconception.. it has a small cross section to narrow wave target acquisition RADARs. It is still very trackable with broad waveform RADAR platforms, albeit at a reduced distance. An AWACS or flight control RADAR has no problem tracking it or the 22 at all for the most part. The problem is those RADARs are imprecise and are not good enough to guide weapons. Also have to remember the 22 and 35 are front aspect stealth only, if looking at them any other way, they are very easy to lock on to. .. well the 35 is, the 22 has a better overall stealth employment. Other than the frontal plane, the aircraft would be closer to "reduced Signature" than stealth. The only true all aspect stealth aircraft the US currently employs is the B-2 and even that is only at standoff ranges, if it gets too close that broad underside will light up targeting RADARs like a Christmas tree.
@@Grisbane always remember you tend to overestimate your relative expertise
@@Grisbane good info if true, thanks for sharing
@@ericvantassell6809 May be he's Russian.
They should have consulted the Ghost of Kyiv before finalising the design of this aircraft.
Dude..... seriously? You buy that CIA propaganda bullshit? Come on. Stop.
@@Valleyhomeboy heard he comes from a country called the Principality of Belka
They did, but vladi boi shit himself, and released the shitbags abouve me. Yeah get pounded Ivan's!
Ghost of Kiev, much like my skills in CoD, both remains in games only 🤣😆😆🇷🇺
@@miamijules2149 boo hoo pal, I don't care!
They said the same kind of stuff about the MiG-25 too. It was supposed to be a Mach 3.2 super plane that would swat F-15's out of the sky. It was only when the West got their hands on an actual example did it become clear that the plane didn't even begin to deliver on all the hype. I suspect that the same thing will turn out to the case here as well.
That has been the MO for ALL Soviet or Russian equipment.
They actually never said that ...
The west saw the plane and thought that ...
The plane was only ever designed and intended as a fast interceptor...
The west saw it and made up ideas in there own head
@@MegaRyan123456 I disagree sir, "The West did not make those ideas up in their collective minds". Russian aircraft have lagged behind "The West's" aircraft by a margin of two to three decades since WWII. Mig 29 and Su 27 entered service in the early to mid nineteen eighties over a decade plus some after "The West" had F15 and F16 in service. The YF 22 and YF 23 programs Fourth generation aircraft were in development and flight testing already by 1990 before the Soviet union dissolved. The "Checkmate" aircraft recently revealed and hyped up by Russia is lackluster compared to the 30 year old American airframe design that new Checkmate was engineered to compare and counter. Maybe Russia can park the Checkmate where that Space Shuttle knockoff languishes when it fails.
@@willardhunghimself there space shuttle is not a knock off its a space shuttle there all going to look the same ...
Its a very different vehicle to the American space shuttle..
It just happeneds that vehicles made to do a similar job kind of look the same ...
@@MegaRyan123456 Yo the Buran is a Copy cat of the STS bud make no mistake it is a Copy Cat Buran shows up almost ten years after STS 5 in 1981 the first operational service flight, but Enterprise STS1 was built in the 70s .
I know what your trying to say bud but your wrong homie. My entire family worked in Aerospace and Military Aircraft. My Grandfather was a Lead Flight line mechanic for Convair, Rockwell International, and Boeing' Rocket Dyne Division. I have sat in in the pilots seat of two STS. .
My point is this dude Russian aircraft are always decades behind US literally., Buran shows up ten years after STS makes 1 L E O with 2 orbits and that's all, the Tupolev Tu160 in 1981a Copy of the B1A that flew in 1975, The Tu 144 is just a Concord rip off it came out after Concord, and the list goes on man. Shit shows up later, Touted as superior, and always ends being a inferior knock off of a pre existing aircraft.
That doesn't look ripped off at all... If the pilots are the same as the ones flying over Ukraine, though, we don't have to worry about the Russian Air Force, stealth fighters or not.
wow, you really seethe whenever you see anything Russian, it's hilarious.
@@TheBinaryHappiness Assume much? I'm not worried about Russia's stealth fighters. I'm relatively sure that the US has the ability to track stealth fighters as easy as you please, given that they've been developing stealth aircraft for decades now.
They've been doing the same thing since 1945. Once, they built a bunch of bombers out of plywood to make it look as if they had many squadarns of long range heavy bombers. Yes, we paniced.
@Z Ham
And CGI
Panicked.
Almost had a cau over that one.
😐And who did they choose to have a cold war with? _The World_ .
I don't know if you're a fan of history or not, but the more I hear about this "Putin", the less I care for him...
@@snickle1980 he’s a real jerk
@@snickle1980 I've always loved history. The important part, I've been able to learn new things that I didn't know, and do the same for others.
Putin's problem- he's still KGB. Like some U.S. Marines, it never left him. He may be picking the most valuable assets to bring back into a new USSR. I've never trusted a word he's ever said. Cool as a cucumber. He could beat any polygraph test in the world. Been in power way too long.
they also have a space shuttle, concord,hyper sonic missile, moon base, etc etc👌
😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣 made my day,
moon base LOl
and a working economy:)))
@@DerDop Ouch..nice one
they also have several tanks towed by Ukranian farmers.
This jet is perfect for air shows. That’s it.
its also perfect in the sights of even outdated russian aircraft
Dont even think its manueverable
But I will say good advertising for it, they win that one lol
Su57/Su35 moment
Yes as it’s towed by tractor, wonder how many Hp it adds to it, image real tight turns, & has a reverse Lol 😎🇨🇦
I've a sneaking suspicion demand for Russian export market junk will be a bit depressed for the next few years, even if they were to somehow turn this specific piece of vaporware into a somewhat flyable aircraft.
If it leaves the simulations it will probably end up like another mig 21
With a 3 losses for every 1 aircraft shot down
Well,this didn't age well
We also know that Russia exagger………..uhm……. Lies about the capability they have achieved. How many time have plane and other device not lived up to the Russian hype. I am not say these are not deadly planes I am simply pointing out the history of what is said to reality. Will be interested in see if it as good as they say. I won’t hold my breath
Russia has around a dozen stealth aircraft in its inventory in various states of readiness. In the next decade or so the US will have nearly 4000. Good luck Russia.
LMAO
“Next decade” a plan is the least of stuff that can go wrong
@@imperialpilot2164 well, until now it's 700 F 35 already in NATO
That's optimistic of you to think Russia will have any kind of military left by the next decade
Only 60 billion military budget
Although superficially the Checkmate seems to look like a "Stealth" fighter, it has a number of shape flaws that would reflect radar. Maybe they are overcoming these with RAM or maybe this is just a crude prototype for public display but I see things in the body shape, wheel and weapons bay doors and other issues that would not be as stealthy as the F-35 or F-22 (even with only using internal weapons). Plus it is anyone's guess about the sensors, computer, and network abilities. I doubt it would stand up as an equivalent to the 22 and 35. But it might be a low cost good fighter, just not really stealth or 5 gen.
Your sir, are my new hero. :-)
it's intentional. the more you focus on stealth capability, the more $$$ you will have to pay which defeats purpose of a massively affordable fighter and real world practicality. Think of it this way: The difference of detection range(front aspect) between 0.01m2 RCS and 0.001m2 RCS is only a measly 10NM with L-band radars and 25 NM with 0.0001m2 which means you don't really get much for what you pay for as you make the RCS of an aircraft smaller. It's much cheaper and smarter to develop stand off capability with longer range munitions than spend stupid amounts of money on diminishing returns. Higher stealth performance also requires more maintenance cost and hours because RAM is notorious for degrading quickly as you increase flight envelope. For example the F-22 requires a minimum of 30 hours of maintenance for every hour of flight time so it stands that potential customers would want a fighter that they can operate more in the air than spend in the hangar.
Those exact shape flaws also exist in F-35. In fact, if you simulate RCS on both mid and long wave for F-35 vs J-31, you'll see that J-31 is pretty much a corrected version with F-35's worst RCS flaws ironed out. The problem with this is, it didn't correct these flaws. It wasn't as if Lockheed Martin didn't realize, but rather that they had no choice, given the requirements sat for them. We don't know the requirements sat for the Russian project, but vertical takeoff probably isn't one of them, nor is cramming in entire specialized ecm suite or command and control model while maintaining single engline configuration, resulting in an overweight underpowered potato. No excuse, unless this is just a hoax meant to waste our tax dollars on extra spending to counter it.
@@georgedang449 so a possible 2020's fox-bat?
@@wiker680 It's possible. Russia's limited military spending can be better spent elsewhere. Even today, they don't have proper stealth coating. You'd think they wouldn't divert resources from that to a whole new plane that, too, won't have coating to use. Then there's the problem with single engine configuration. Developing the new large single engine will take extra, when 2 existing engine will do. A lot of this doesn't make sense. It's too similar to the F-35 that they don't need and can't afford.
If it's anything like other recent aircraft, Putin will order a half dozen and end up with maybe 2 in service flying at airshows and demand unattainable cost reductions for future orders.
Rhetorical question: why do the Russian and Chinese aircraft always seem to look extremely similar to American aircraft?....
Because they both play catch up, stealing info and ideas. It's hilarious when you hear them spout crap about being superior. Nevermind all they will be able to make soon is ww1 style by-planes.
Art initiating life.
Is it rhetorical, or ignorant? I mean the answer is obvious, theres only a few ways to make a proper airplane.
That's very ignorant to say. Firstly obviously, there's only a few ways to make a proper airplane. Secondly, Russians have made fair share of real innovative contributions to Fighter aircrafts industry. Chinese initially started with reverse engineering Russian aircrafts but now they have learned and improved a lot, to the point that they are now producing their own designs
Because they're scavengers at heart.
Hold up, this is the same Russia that had to use smartphones for navigation in Syria? There are plenty of photos
"Checkmate" the "hyperloop" of military jets!
If it actually becomes a real thing, then I hope NATO will adopt the codename r/NonCredibleDefense has given it.
The Su-75 Femboy
So stealthy we've gone 9 days into a war and haven't seen it at all!
damn must be some kind of futuristic tech
They have cloaking technology. The true stealth. Not radar evading or Low radar technology used by the US.
@@estellemelodimitchell8259 ahahahahaha
Uuh, we havent still seen it around day 60 ish
i dont think they would be using these prototypes into war, pretty sure the su-57 hasnt even been used in action at all
And they can build nearly 3 of them and have enough spare parts to fly one of them at a time
All the money already bought a Yatch
Keep in mind that the Pak fa had it's first flight 12 years ago. Meanwhile there are more than 700 F35s already in service.
Russia saw the smiling VTOL jet prototype and went “Damn that shit bussin’ “ and proceeded to make their own smiling jet
It would be a miracle if they ever make even half a dozen test platforms of this let alone the aircraft they’re describing in their propaganda.
We should have an airshow like that too.. we can show episodes of Air-wolf and knight Rider .. make some styrofoam mockups.. awesome..
Doesn't the air intake for the engine run stright through the internal weapons bay or does the intake reduce in size enough to be lead around the bay?
I think the intake is s-shaped laterally to allow for the 2 side missile doors.
@@generalrendar7290 It's S shaped for sure to hide the engine internals from radar returns and lower the frontal IR signature.
@@SWRaptor1 The shape helps maintain proper airflow to the inlet. The inside of an f-16 intake is similar and the variable ramps on the f-15 perform the same function.
Imagine hearing about this, then being ordered to duct tape a garmin GPS to your MIG
Russia cant Even perfected their su-57 so I'm a little skeptical about this
This has already won all internet combat missions
It's amazing how every generation of aircraft is looking more and like macross fighters.
The series takes inspiration from modern aircraft. There are plenty of valkyries outside of the anime series like the A-6 Intruder and the J20.
Veritechs are a long way off I think
The Russian arms industry is in deep trouble. It has huge debts even after Putin wrote off a significant amount of it! The average age of an engineer in the arms industry over 50 in Russia. Engineers are retiring faster that they can be replaced. The pay is also fairly low. There is also a lack of skilled workers, and because of low pay there isn't enough entering it. The prospects are not good.
Even though this info is seeming less plausible by the day, you guys do a great job. Keep it up!
If Russia can't afford more than two T-14 Armata tanks how can they buy one of these?
Probably just gonna put some crappy avionics to make it cheaper and call it a day
I’m not a airplane person but that plane looks suspiciously like a F-35.
Its a new version of the YF-23. Look that up. They contracted with foreign countries to help them build their jets, after losing the contract to the F-35.
@@kylecarnine537 The YF-23 is... Very far different in design, Twin Engines, extremely low profile, centerline fuselage weapon bays, Diamond Wings.
The Checkmate is most similar to the X-32 Prototype (Albeit sleeker and less obese.)
@@justarette133 I’m not the sharpest blade in the knife 🔪 box!😂
@@kylecarnine537 I’m not the sharpest tool in daddy’s tool box. From a non aircraft type of person, it definitely says copy cat all over it.
Well, although they haven’t managed AI yet, they certainly made an artificial airplane (AA).
You would think one of the main advantages to UAV is that it doesnt have to take human limitations (amount of G-force, heat, and pressure) into account. This is slower and less maneuverable than the manned f 35 that isnt made for dog fighting (we have much better for that). Yes cheaper so can swarm in numbers but not a top of line weapon.
For me, it would be like easy bots you find in multiplayer games..
It's just that, could it even keep up with the ever-changing tactics of the battlefield? (No constant moves)
You people speak as if you are veterans in air combat
It’s faster than the F-35 but as the USAF found with the F-22, flying above Mach 1.4 significantly increases the thermal signature of the aircraft which makes it much easier to spot for IR weapons.
This is why they reduced the top speed of the F-22 and made it so that the F-35 wouldn’t go as fast either.
@@matijatoskovic5666 what did he say that is false?
The Russians talk a good game but we're currently seeing in Ukraine how useless they are in real, actual combat.
“newest stealth fighter” when they have like 10
operational Felons
After the current severe actions, this aircraft likely won't see the light of day now.
Also aged poorly
This is like the Russian Su-47 Berkut in that they can build this plane if some one gonna buy it. Beyond that its cool CGI models.
Russia keeps saying how great their military is. How technologically advanced they are, how tough their soldiers are.
Meanwhile, in Ukraine...
Russia is quite poor. And the money they have from oil and gas goes to the elite. The army is great in numbers but their equipment is shit.
The size of their economy is that of Belgium and Netherlands combined.
So yes, this is all smoke and mirrors. (and always have been)
The orcs retreated
All of those hardpoints and straight angles will mean the stealth capabilities are BS. And the same goes for their claim of the top speed.
it looks like from the overhead thumbnail image, they added Elevators (or possible tail stabilizers) to the rear of the plane. Meaning they're having stability and maneuverability issues with the aircraft already. Their "Ruddervator" just isnt big enough to handle the stress or performance that this aircraft wants to produce.
Noticed that too
Well I see the tradition of beautiful Russian fighters is ended.... U G L Y. None of the menace of the MiG-29, none of the panache of the Su-57
All I care is how many standard missile hits does it take in ace combat
as long as it takes one QAAM or SASM im fine with not knowing
Now we know what the newest aggressor aircraft will look like in the next unprovoked attack by Russia against friendly neighbors.
America is famous for not attacking innocent people and countries
Aeroflot has a fleet of about 60 Boeing and 120 Airbus jets. They also have 10 Sukhoi Superjets that no one else wanted to buy. Russia's state airline won't buy Russian airplanes, so I doubt that Russia's air force, which doesn't get a choice, really has planes that are as superior as they are bragging about.
The Boeing and Airbus jets will have to land very soon. If they are leased they have to be returned and if not they will stop operating very fast anyway because they need constant supply of replacement parts and maintenance that only the original companies can provide.
Well with those sanctions on semiconductors and other technology advances looks like Russia is in "Checkmate"...
It's capable of interstellar travel according to Russia.
Plus, its already won all internet engagements aganist NATO
Keyword according to russia
"Its expected to be a rival to the f35" so basically we are fine as long as we dont get rid of the f22
F-22 is being retired in 2030 because F-35 is more capable and can establish air superiority on its own. And once air superiority is established, specialized aircraft like the F-22 are relatively useless as the majority of the war becomes ground attack and CAS.
@@moist_ointment No it's getting retired because the USAF are developing NGAD and the USN are developing F/A-XX
All of Russia's sexy military toys seem to have a LOT more hype than practical effectiveness. Russia still doesn't have air superiority in Ukraine, their military seems to be a joke
If they use external pods, you can say goodbye to stealth
When the teaser tweet was released, I honestly thought it was some type of new ARG having to do with the Black Knight Satellite. 'Cause, you know, it was a black knight chess piece, on top of a UFO.
Good luck building those without semiconductors.
The weapons platform is one thing Pilot training is another and the support system is another
When you order your F-35 from wish.
See thats funny.
Boeing X32 - can’t help but think that they have gotten hold of information on that mothballed aircraft, and built on it to create the Chkmte.
ah yes the "smiling shit"
Yeah, I was thinking of that too.
" :D " plane
Low observable maybe, at $30 million I'd call it a high end 4th generation with 5th generation design flavoring.
4+
It's a mig 29 with some body panels and a paint job.
Russia: builds a new brand new 5th gen Stealth fighter
Also Russia: losses their best ship in the black sea named after their capital to a country without no navy.
Ngl, Nuptune ASM do be bussin
And it will come with a Garmin handheld GPS unit included in the price
Good one.
The big question I have is....will Russia build more than 2 of these? The Russians have yet to put more than 2 SU57s into service.
Say what you will about the Russians, they design beautiful aircraft. (Though if this gets produced and is a true stealth a/c, I’ll be surprised.)
Well, they clearly pay very close attention to American engineering.
@@haidengeary8277 >> Yes, it does look like a combination of the F-35 and a less ugly X-32!
I mean, yeah
Must admit that some of them are really aesthetically pleasing.
But still F16 is best bae
I think being functional is a more important criteria than being pretty.
@@inso80 We are talking about the looks tho, none of us are engineers or fighter pilots
I see what they want is to sell this damn thing....... BUT after Ukraine I don't see many countries being interested, then you have to think with the ridiculous amount of sanctions how can they build a sufficient number to sell.....
"Hope to sell their first production models by 2023" ...lol, pretty sure those plans are going to change.
Very stealthy with that giant exhaust pipe sticking out the back.
same as the F-35 essentially
“They’ve taken?” They don’t have the technology, and they couldn’t afford to develop it. It’s really hard, and very expensive.
"Mom can we have x-32?"
"We have x-32 at home."
X-32 at Home:
Wow, i wonder if they will build 4 or 5 or 6 of these?
If this turns out to be the russian equivalent of the F-35, buyers everywhere are in trouble.
Well they'd probably think it's better than having no jets.
@@marrqi7wini54 well. I can’t say i blame them
Still no match for the “Ghost” lol
It's so futuristic that it will always be in the future
Looks like the boeing X-32
Good, I'm not the only one who thinks that...
Yep it’s the x32 and the x23 had a baby and made that thing. I think they stole the wrong usb files
Send Clint Eastwood over to steal it.
Ah yes, a new target for the ghost
ah yes the comment section, everybody knows classified information like how F-22 is better.
It’s all just bluster. It’s not in the class of an F35, not even close. With all the orders and all the optimizing and streamlining that comes with mass producing, and the lowest we can get the F35’s cost down to is $78M, there’s no way Russia’s gonna offer anything similar for the low $30’s. It’ll be an F35 shaped griffon with a stealth coating applied to the surface on the front. The F35’s biggest advantage is it’s sensors, avionics, and massive computing capabilities. It’s got the aviation industry’s first quantum computer. Get real.
The f35 does not have an quantum computer 🤣
You could not even fit a useful one in the airframe with all the cooling requirements a quantum processor needs
The processors inside a f35 will be 10 year old military rated arm or x86 processors made for reliability and mission critical applications
Try not to be a bullshit artist 🤣
@@MegaRyan123456 I don’t know you, but if you say you deal in bullshit, I suppose I must believe you, yes?
I saw it in the airplane. I read the label, it said, “D-wave.”
I researched it, and not only has the Pentagon been using them, they must be impressed, because they are buying the D-wave 2, that is set to come out, if not already. D-wave has published its research in scientific periodicals. NASA,Google, and another large space program are all making purchases. Just Google D-wave.
There is so much to the F35, that other countries posing and claiming any equivalence to the F35 is laughable.
@@tobyihli9470 the dwave 2 is not fitted to the plane mate its used in software validation its got nothing to do with the plane itself
@@tobyihli9470 you a dwave 2 is a massive mainframe style quantum supercomputer 🤣
@@tobyihli9470 so your telling me you just looked inside an f35 and saw something labelled dwave 🤣
Russia looks like they have great equipment, then it gets on the battlefield and either farts and breaks down or gets blown up
Russian military vehicles work amazingly well and are overpowered in video games/movies/hype-media, but they suck balls when the fight starts
While the plane is not as sexy as they suggested, i have to say that advertisement was great.
Given the current situation, Russian war machines might be off the table 4 a bit
If any of you have seen the Ukraine debacle, Russia?, stealth? With 25,000+ casualties they need stealth soldiers. I don't believe they have capable crews to operate any of the new military weapons they have acquired. If so, why did they deploy WW2 weapons(T72- tanks?) in a 2022 conflict? or, when are they going to bring the new toys out?
Man, that video aged fast!
Folks who think the intake area is too small should have a look at the intake on the MiG-21. The air is compressed before it enters. In the case of the MiG-21 it was the nose cone which did it. In the case of the Su-75, it's ...
Just the fact it doesn’t need to also be a VTOL jet makes the whole project a lot cheaper
only one version of the Lightning II, the F-35B, is built with that capability, the rest require a standard take-off method. remove that variant from the comparison and the Checkmate still costs less than half as much as all the example competitors this video mentions, except for the JAS-35E.
Take Su57...swap the digits and you have a Su75.
Our lil little bird could shoot that outta the sky & or our A-10 😂😂😂😂😂🇺🇸🇺🇸🙌🏻
A 10 is a great ground attack aircraft but dog fighting isn't its strong point.... F-16 on the other hand or anything else after that is another issue but honestly Russia hasn't had aircraft capable of competing with the best of the USAF since Vietnam and in my opinion they still won't after the "Checkmate" is released.
F22 raptor is still the baddest plane in the sky.
@ TONY Malloy I agree ☝🏻 but was making a joke 🇺🇸😎😂😂😂😂🍻🍻🍻 thanks & cheers ! “ the Conrad’s are a bunch of drunks n my point was our smaller assets could handle em 🙄😊
So, with current events we could think something like this:
"We made plane cheaper because of upcoming crippled economy"
Literly pressed ctrl+c / ctrl+v
Some US fighter pilots have done videos on this jet and are all saying a lot of its tech and abilities are same as any 4th Gen jet but a lot claimed aren’t possible. They state speed AND range can’t physically be possible with even the “still to come saturn “ engine , the price they say us wayyyyy off IF it’s going to have the abilities they claim ,..remember the F35 thst was suppose to be $75M per jet came much higher initially but once ramped up in production the standard is now $80M not 130 as you stated. That was the B model and cost when they first came out , they’ve dropped as much as $40M per jet since then.
I have to agree, that was a bad ass light show.
Throw in some Pink Floyd, a bag of weed, and you got yourself one hell of a Friday night.
... The F-35 is a multi-roll stealth fighter. its suppose to put as much power into fighting land targets as all other areas. and i did NOT seen any kind of targeting pod for the Su-75 here. the F-35 uses a AN/AAQ-40 built in targeting pod.
The Su-57 is supposedly ALSO a multi-roll fighter. rather than just being a air-superiority fighter with ground attack ability like the F-22, the Su-57 also lacks targeting pods.
hell not even that, why is it using an IRST so big still? the F-35 uses a 360 degree IRST, AN/AAQ-37.
This isnt 'near-pier' tech, and as we see in Ukraine, they dont want to compete. just cause trouble.
Well if this is the jet they are using in Ukraine...it ain't doing so well...
why does it have external mounts?
To make it look bigger, stronger, mightier, aggressive, meaner...as it's shot down in flames.