$150,000 Doctor Dad Is Underemployed and Not Earning Up to His Full Capacity
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
- The content revolves around a court case involving Alexis Tabaka and Christopher Tabaka regarding child support. The court was asked to determine the effective date of child support and address objections raised by the parties. One of the main objections was regarding the credibility of Christopher Tabaka's testimony, with his attorney arguing that the referee's determination was unfair and not supported by the facts. The attorney also highlighted discrepancies in the handling of discovery and questioned the referee's decision to blame Christopher for not having certain data readily available during the hearing. On the other hand, the opposing counsel argued that Christopher was underemployed and not earning up to his full capacity, pointing out job opportunities that he had refused due to personal preferences. The opposing counsel believed that Christopher should be imputed a higher income based on his earning potential. Ultimately, the court had to weigh these arguments and make a decision on the child support matter.
The content summarizes arguments made during a hearing regarding child support. The speaker defends Chris, stating that it was unfair to expect him to have all his financial information ready for the hearing as he did not anticipate testifying again. They argue that the responsibility falls on the other party to prove income and that sufficient discovery was not conducted within a reasonable time frame. The speaker also challenges the credibility of the referee's determination against Chris, citing past litigation where he was not found to be untruthful. They argue that utility costs on a rental property should be deducted from gross profits when calculating income for child support. Finally, the opposing counsel argues that the referee's decision to find Chris underemployed and evasive in his testimony was appropriate based on his voluntary work choices and qualifications. The opposing party argues that simply wishing for the individual to earn more is not enough and that the law regarding child support must be followed. The court also addresses objections regarding tax considerations and how certain income sources were classified.The attorney pointed out discrepancies in discovery handling and the referee blaming Christopher for not having certain data available. The opposing counsel argued that Christopher was underemployed and should be imputed a higher income based on his earning potential. The court had to consider these arguments to make a decision on the child support issue.
Oh, he’s a vet, not a people doctor. Veternarians don’t make nearly as much as human doctors do.
A doctor decides not to take a job that isn’t his specialty- that sounds like a good thing to me. I wouldn’t want gp taking on brain surgery
Especially when he’s a veterinarian not a people doctor
The fact that there isn’t one number across the board is crazy. How do they justify someone paying 210.00 vs 10,000 just because someone makes more money. Lifestyle should never be considered.
They just make it up
I got a divorce and immediately quit my engineering job and took a job as a custodian..
The court didn't like that, but I said indentured servitude is unconditional and they were trying to force me into an employment contract which they can't do.
They cannot force you to sign a contract, all employment requires a contract. That point stopped the court in its tracks. They cannot force you into a civilian contract.
The court still made you pay a percentage of your custodial income for support. If this is even true, the court could have ordered support based upon your earning potential. I hope you enjoy living on a janitorial salary, it’s got to be a major adjustment. You stuck it to your ex and kid, I guess you think it’s worth it.
Shocker, Family Court System on full view of the biased towards the man.
If he's not making enough she could always fill that void and become a overachiever since that's what she desires
She married a dr thinking she a hit payday when she divorced him
Divorce and child support is a scary thing once money is involved
That is the mother's attorney attempting to make the father out to be a bad guy. Another just horrible attorney and a BMT that just wants the $$ and that is it.
Again, being able to force someone to take jobs which are not in their potential. See again it is all about the $$ to these heartless women. Vets do not make the money like a person doctor. Again, he is not going to take a job that is not in his wheelhouse, or outside of his school set. He should not have to move for work, which makes it harder to see his children. Again, why can't the mom get off her ass and work to help support the kids as well. No, it is not computed to the earning potential it is what he actually makes.
Well said
I utterly hate these types of court hearings. The defendant and plaintiff get to just sit there not allowed to speak as their life gets picked apart.
That’s what they pay their attorneys for, plus it keeps the emotion and bitterness out of the proceedings. Also, these people should have had a pre-court discussion with their attorneys, allowing them input into what information is brought forward.
@@acmhfmggru While it was verbally intense, the lawyers did not raise their voices, did not cry, did not make emotionally based accusations- all the points were based in provable facts. Find some cases where the plaintiff and/or the defense are pro se. Those get really nasty and the judge has to call them out. Neither attorney even objected.
By idiot lawyers who aren’t financially experts nor experts in childhood development and are incentivized to drag out the process
They can absolutely testify if they want but their better off letting the attorneys take care of it.
Realy dont understand his income, has anything to do with childsupport... Glad it isn`t like that here...
Her attorney says the kids suffer because dad is underemployed and will definitely say that the kids suffer if the dad had to move away for employment. If the mother feels that she can’t adequately support the children with the current child support maybe she should allow dad to have primary custody of the children.
Kids won’t suffer any more than if the couple was married and dad lost his job only for his new one to be paid less. Thus they’re standard of living changes
Every woman should be required to work to collect child support. Minimum 40 hours.
A mothers full time job is taking care of the children and she should never work outside the home while raising the children. It is the fathers responsibility to work while earning enough to properly provide for his family and his wife.
@@aarons3695 I said if child support is involved. You are talking about being married and I’m talking about divorce or break up
Whether she works or not, this doesn’t negate the father’s responsibility to support his children. Both parents are responsible for support.
@@DEUT28iztruth no it doesn’t negate it. But child support is based on both their incomes and if she doesn’t have one, he will be forced to pay more.
@@aarons3695 this is no longer a marriage
Sooooo did i miss what hes to pay in support??? Nothing but rattling......
She's a strong independent woman who don't need no man..... She does however need his money apparently.... Just another gold digger who wants to keep the lifestyle but not the husband who provided it.....
@@jasonhare8540 🤣.... American System! NO FAULT DIVORCE! Permanent Alimony! Mandatory DNA testing! If You Got Cheated and Child is not Yours! It's the Man's Fault 🤣! Where are the Man's Rights!
I think this is a dangerous precedent, what if he is a horrible doctor? Are you the court going to force a horrible doctor to work on the general public to provide for their children by putting us in danger?
They can’t force him to work. It’s unconstitutional
As long as he is taking care of his children, who cares if he takes certain jobs? Are the children suffering from, are they truly suffering? If they are, where does the other parent come in?
A person can choose what ever job they want no matter their qualifications.
Right!! How can they say you let your license lapse and you didn’t give a good enough reason so ur lying.. or the daytrading maybe it wasn’t as good as he thought it would be and he was losing money ..its ridiculous to me that the court can make a decision like that…Tell that lady to get off her ass and get an fing job or two or three and stop sucking her ex-husband dry
the trick is getting someone else to invest in the person doing that job for them
Yep, BUT if they're doing it to lower child support, they'll find out real quick the courts can and often will punish for that.
Yes very true. But the issue comes up if there is evidence that they are choosing a job specifically to lessen their child support responsibility. It does happen a lot, so I can understand why the mom may be suspicious.
But I also understand the need that people have to find a job they are passionate about or that improves their quality of life. My husband chose to leave a company where he was up for promotion to make $300k+…but he was miserable there. He is happier now than he would ever be
@@sassysav6859 I think the point here is, what if the shoe was on the other foot? Would the woman get the same treatment as a man?
Child support Money Should be Checked and Receipt should be Submitted to court to justify the spending of child support! Normally child support is Spend on the women and not on the child!
Child support is NOT for the child, it's for the maintenance of a child, such as rent/mortgage, house bills and anything else required to maintain a child. It's not money for the child, almost all of the judges I've seen on these types of channels say that over and over again. Why would anyone, man or woman, be expected to prove what it was spent on if they're paying the necessary bills? It is more often than not that women abuse the child support system, but I don't see keeping a track record would help anyone but would add to the headache for courts.
And, this woman is clearly only about money, which is vile.
It always makes me laugh when people say things like that. Why do people (usually those ordered to pay support) believe that child support is basically like allowance for the child to spend on whatever they want. It’s to help provide everything the child needs. Lots of women, like this one in the video is definitely trying to take advantage though!!
@@bhilyer Rent is approx 600 to 800 dollars! Seriously, I have seen a child support amount about 300 dollars a month! What are you Talking about! If some women want to live in a Mansion from the Child support money than what! An agency should be made to regulate and monitor the spend on the child. Because it's for the child! It's not Alimony
@@rachaelthorpe4491 Child support Should be 50/50 🤣 Like Women wanted 50/50 😹....
u cant tell me what type of job i shiuld take. what kinda ish is that. male or female
The court cant take you to take any jobs. But they can require you to pay a specific amount. If you cant pay they will punish you.
@supernova743 they can say u need a job ..cool but when did they gain the right to say whether ur under-employed or how much u need to make.? ur support is based on what u make not what they think you can make
He clearly is playing games and is underemployed. This applies to him and any woman that thinks they are entitled to a standard of living they had in marriage.
So the courts can make a person work? Make a person ove to accept a job? I know several people with college degrees , one with a masters, that have chosen low paying jobs as the corporate stress was too much. They now enjoy a more relaxed life but scaled down. Mental health is important.Hating your job is bad on mental health. I heard nothing about the ex wife's work history. She is expecting to live off what a doctor makes but divorced the doctor. I wonder what he has to pay in child support. Sad if she must lower her standard of living.
They can’t. They just use it as a threat. No one can be forced into servitude. We outlawed slavery years ago
These women have lost their damn minds