Digital ethics and the future of humans in a connected world | Gerd Leonhard | TEDxBrussels

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • This talk was given at a local TEDx event, produced independently of the TED Conferences. Digital ethics and the future of humans in a connected world
    Gerd Leonhard is a well-known Futurist and Author of 5 books, a highly influential Keynote Speaker, Think-Tank Leader & Advisor, the Founder of GreenFuturists and the Creator / Host of The Future Show. Gerd also serves as Visiting Professor at the Fundação Dom Cabral (São Paulo, Brazil). He is well-known as the Co-author of the influential book ‘The Future of Music’ (Berklee Press, 2005), and as the author of ‘The End of Control’ (2007), ‘Music 2.0’ (2008), ‘Friction is Fiction’ (2009, Lulu Publishing), and ‘The Future of Content’ (Kindle-only, 2011).
    Gerd is considered a leading expert on topics such as the future of humanity, big data and privacy, digitally native business models, the networked society, a sustainable business ecology, social media, social business and So-Lo-Mo communications, TV & Radio futures, mobile strategies, innovation, leadership and entrepreneurship, consumer trends, UGC and peer production, copyright and IPR issues, next-generation advertising, marketing and branding, and more recently the development of ‘green futures‘ scenarios. In 2006, The Wall Street Journal called Gerd ‘one of the leading Media Futurists in the World’.
    About TEDx, x = independently organized event In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @vamshikrisg8577
    @vamshikrisg8577 5 років тому +6

    That's interesting. I had quite a few discussions on this in my Management class at USYD. Fascination never ceases while talking about the future of this technological world.

  • @LuciaFreitas
    @LuciaFreitas 6 років тому +6

    Thank you Gerd for this most fundamental thinking about our reality.

  • @udaybhaskar448
    @udaybhaskar448 5 років тому +3

    Thanks a ton dear Gerd Leonhard, for very insightful talk and ideas. It inspires all of us to rethink and reframe on what is valuable and what sells, though there are majority of 'hubots' who turn into technology or gadgets, the real quest for meaning and self-realisation is not only immensely worthwhile but also joyful.

  • @anthonyleonard
    @anthonyleonard 9 років тому +4

    I highly recommend this talk where Gerd Leonhard provides an excellent high-level overview of exponential change using various excerpts from current exponential change thought leaders. Gerd asks relevant, timely, and thought provoking questions about the ethics and implications of exponential change.

  • @ChristineWeiss
    @ChristineWeiss 9 років тому +2

    great talk, totally agree on your insights and forsights. Hope we make the balance :-)

  • @aliciarossano4390
    @aliciarossano4390 3 роки тому +10

    Six years later: Neither Google Glass nor Jibo were successful. Self-driving cars still are not commonplace. HOWEVER Alexa, Siri, and Social Media are doing more than their fair share of damage

  • @parepidemosproductions4741
    @parepidemosproductions4741 5 років тому

    I was really sad before I clicked on this video, but this video gave all the words for why I am sad. thanks for sharing

  • @CandyLemon36
    @CandyLemon36 6 місяців тому

    This is highly informative content. A similar book I read was just as enlightening. "The Art of Meaningful Relationships in the 21st Century" by Leo Flint

  • @jquiam101
    @jquiam101 Рік тому

    That's interesting

  • @coudry1
    @coudry1 Рік тому

    "Selamat Pagi"

  • @batasmelvinp.2585
    @batasmelvinp.2585 Рік тому +4

    I am here because of my professor 😅

  • @Abdimaan208
    @Abdimaan208 7 років тому

    what the main takeaway is from the information presented in the video.

  • @blackwhitegrey001
    @blackwhitegrey001 5 років тому +8

    Watch in speed 1.25

  • @illam11
    @illam11 4 роки тому +7

    Can AI could smoke weed

    • @amelieschuberth8070
      @amelieschuberth8070 4 роки тому +4

      The question is not could it or not. The question is could we create an "AI weed" that have the same psycho and physio effects on the AI.

    • @AlForte13
      @AlForte13 3 роки тому +1

      lol I think you guys are smoking too much weed!

  • @parepidemosproductions4741
    @parepidemosproductions4741 5 років тому

    12:52 is this what Freddie Mercury and Brian May's mean when they're asking basically the same question?

  • @surenderdahiya8131
    @surenderdahiya8131 7 років тому +1

    nanobots fixing cholesterol levels. or internet on iris.

  • @aryankhilosia9570
    @aryankhilosia9570 5 років тому

    Ur really clever

  • @jotahapsoro
    @jotahapsoro 2 роки тому

    Apa sy doang nih warga +62 di sini? Mungkin belio tau, suatu saat sy akan kemari makanya belio greeting pake bahasa Indo. wkwkw

  • @zanderracing17z7
    @zanderracing17z7 6 років тому +7

    how early did you fall asleep while watching this?

  • @idd267
    @idd267 3 роки тому +1

    Krta kam ohi

  • @vitormonteiro6104
    @vitormonteiro6104 2 роки тому +1

    It was so hard to focus with the slides being so poorly designed. Seems very unprofessional for TED,

  • @j.maybrick8596
    @j.maybrick8596 Рік тому

    Maybe down the line digital gonads and ovaries will be developed and marketed. It could turn into the ethical majority someday.

  • @kevincaraballo2258
    @kevincaraballo2258 4 роки тому +3

    not a big fan of this

  • @starfeel6127
    @starfeel6127 5 років тому +5

    I'm not really fond of having someone breathe down my ears for 20 minutes straight

  • @michaeldoherty4005
    @michaeldoherty4005 9 років тому +3

    Computers must be programed and since they are machines they are not able to make free choices. They are only as smart as their programmers and they "always" act according to their programming. There will never be a time that computers hold a primacy over human beings, what a fantasy. Even though a computer can calculate faster than a human being it cannot make decisions like a human being, it is mere programming and human beings are creatures of intellect and free will, created in the image of God.

    • @burjalmadre
      @burjalmadre 7 років тому +3

      Michael Doherty omg I was totally reading your post and thinking "heres a person who knows how to think"... until I got to metaphysical throw in at the end which threw me off. Disappointing.

    • @Bls61793
      @Bls61793 6 років тому +5

      Had this conversation with my old man recently... unfortunately, as a software engineer doing R&D on Artificial Intelligence I fundamentally disagree. I do not believe that my position comes from a place of hubris and over-estimation of human abilities because I honestly wish that we (human beings-specifically software people) were NOT capable of some of the things that we are (some of it is just too dangerous). That being said. You ARE correct. Machines MUST be programmed, and they follow their instructions. HOWEVER, what you are missing here is this: Software is written to perform a pre-defined tasks in a certain order. However, "Learn how to be the best mechanic in the world" and "Repair this vehicle" are valid pre-defined tasks that a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) CAN perform. The main "task" that AI programmers code into their software is "Learn". Also, it IS possible for software to write more software, as software code is nothing more than a text file. There are very few software programs in existence which cannot write text files. By extension, once an AI program "Learns" how to do these complex tasks, it is then possible for the program to generate a new version of itself which includes instructions for how to repair that vehicle in that situation. DISCLAIMER: very simplified for brevity.

    • @boblewutube
      @boblewutube 3 роки тому +2

      Would you review again and let us know if the last five years of technology advancement has changed your mind?

  • @GianiStuparich
    @GianiStuparich 4 роки тому +1

    This guy does not understand complementarity between security end privacy. And he is also unable to think in term of governance of the digital word. Pathetic.