Creation Genetics FACE OFF! (feat Sy Garte) - (Ken) Ham & AiG News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Ken Ham and his team have a weekly "news" show, reacting to the news stories of the day from a Christian young-earth creation perspective from the Answers in Genesis staff at his Creation Museum.
Sy Garte and I join Ken, Bodie, and Georgia as they discuss - Researchers recognize DNA complexity; Devotees celebrate Darwin Day and more during Answers News, broadcast live from the Creation Museum.
Sy Garte
www.amazon.com...
/ channel
Answers News February 24, 2020
• "Lamech Took Two Wives...
Support Paulogia at
/ paulogia
www.paypal.me/p...
teespring.com/...
Follow Paulogia at
/ paulogia0
/ paulogia0
/ discord
Its nice to see even though Sy Garte is a Christian. He is willing to show up on Paulogia show and show why Evolution is real. Thanks for your input Sy Garte.
Edison did not invent the incandescent light bulb, he figured out how to make it commercially viable.
The same argument works for Elon Musk and Steve Jobs. They market stuff built by others.
@RDE Lutherie Meh, facebook could be considered to just build on what myspace established. We should still be giving Wozniak much more credit than he gets tho in regards to Apple!!
@Hunter D I agree.. the filament lamp trial evidence are all in the Henry Ford museum in Dearborn and you can see the number of engineers that worked with him (Edison)
@Hunter D its funny that Edison gets all the flack for something that EVERY company does today in terms of intellectual property.
Hes like the Jesus of inventors, scapegoating the sins of all invention companies.
@RDE Lutherie Except that they are the one's who have provided the funds,taken the risk and hedged their money towards improvement of the products.
Yes scientists should be praised but that doesn't mean businessmen shouldn't they are also a part of the system which have created all these miracles.
BREAKING NEWS: Ark Encounter has filed for bankruptcy and is reorganizing under the new name "Kenny Ham's Firewood Emporium", right next to Comfort's Frozen Banana Stand. Their motto - "By the armful or by the truckload, we have wood for you." RockOn, Paul.
Michael Meszaros or Rotten Banana Stand?
Great video as always.
DON'T DEBATE people like Ham. They won't be moved by reason and science, and debating it with them makes it look like their apologetics are legitimate opinions.
"Science has robbed us of joy!" Yes, yes, ignorance is bliss for AiG, we get it. Lol
#askPaulogia Was Jesus a Rabbi? If not where would’ve he learned to read/ gain insight into El/Yahweh [Yhwh]? My presumption is his parents, but new information is always appreciated even when hard to accept.
Damn just discovered this channel oct2020.When is the next get together?#AskPaul
23:00 Jesus was also not a Christian.
Yeah, good point!
What are the lyrics to the "Hamm and AIG" theme song?
...flip 'em, flop 'em...
@@bouldersoundguy Thank you very much!!!
Why not call "Junk DNA" as "Unexplained DNA"
I still don't understand this point 26:41 - 27:04
Wouldn't it be possible to take, for example, a bunch of cats and
put them in a special environment for a very long time
which forces them to slowly evolve into a species
which has exactly the same characteristics as goats?
I understand that new species would have the cat species as its ancestor, unlike goats from today,
but wouldn't members of that new species be, by all means and purposes, goats?
So, in the way presented above, wouldn't it be possible to get a goat from a cat through evolution?
Can somebody please clarify this for me?
No they would be goat-like cats, and their internal anatomy would be completely different from goats and more like their cat ancestor. So would their genes, so this goat-like cat would be phylogenetically nested inside the feline clade. There is no way for even the most goat-like feline to ever become a member of a different clade. That's why the whole notion of "kind" is stupid because you can make a cat a non-cat just be labeling it something different. So if you named that goat-like cat a "Gocat" you could argue it's a "non-cat" simply be the relabeling of the clade. It will forever be part of the feline clade though.
Thank you for your response. So evolution simply can not completely change the internal anatomy of a species? I thought that, given enough time and the right conditions, even that would change eventually, even if it would be extremely hard to change it in such a radical way.
@@aniedubieb7613 From species to species there is very little internal or genetic change. You need long term evolution to get major divergence
Didn't Georgia study genetics too? She obviously didn't learn anything though. :O Any time they label someone "they" it's their image of someone, not the real person (or group, point of view etc). Tiresome!
Ken Ham settled on "Answers in Genesis" because "Lying for Jesus" wasn't opening enough wallets.
Which, honestly, I doubt would actually be the case. Considering how happy idiots are to throw money at these transparent charlatans, I have no reason to think that Ken Ham starting a fundraising campaign called 'Lying for Jesus' wouldn't break records.
I mean, Oral "If I don't get a million dollars God told me he'd kill me" Roberts? Creflo "I need a new airplane! Gimme your money!" Dollar, for fuck's sake?
@@EdwardHowton
You're probably right. "Lying for Jesus" would be just as popular as Ham's new book, "Fu-k You, Give Me Money".
@Ramp Shark
That would be a kick ass song title.
@S Gloobal
Answers In Genesis is misleading and false, Lying for Jesus would be the honest name for Ken's organization.
@S Gloobal
Are you serious? Calling a liar a liar is not an ad hominem attack. Ken Ham teaches that man and dinosaurs lived together, and the Earth was created at around the time Sumerians invented beer.
I really do love when Christians, especially scientists, chime in on the madness of Young Earth Creationism. It certainly makes it feel a lot less like "us vs them," and more like, "go science!"
8:21 undesirable stuff can happen to DNA strands. But rather than a god fixing THAT FLAW he makes a repair system THAT HAS NO FLAWS. Do they ever LISTEN to themselves?
That would be like the electrician fixing the power cord when the circuit breaker trips.
It feels even more confused when you consider that... Why does a repair mechanism even exist if everything is Perfect?
AiG: Looking for reasons to argue with evolution under the false pretense that this somehow makes the bible right
right?
And this is why I really enjoy this channel, you have found and expert, who clearly has a great deal of experience in the field to provide a better rebuttal in spite of his religion. So it's not about Atheism vs. Christianity but about good vs. bad scientific literacy.
Yeah, I want the "infinite like button" for this.
It's why Paul is credible and AIG isn't.
I completely agree.
Well something that is presented as science while not being falsifiable, reproducible or verifiable, a great example being the MMR vaccine causing autism ridiculousness.
Oh my, I seem to have enticed a troll out from under their bridge. I'm guessing by your bizarre term of chemical evolution you actually mean abiogenesis, if you are that is still being studied, as it should be, and it can be falsified by showing that chemical interactions have no emergent properties that would lead to them forming compounds essential for life (e.g. RNA) under naturally occurring conditions. Which, spoiler alert, it would seem they do. The silly thing about your statement is that various avenues of research into the potential course of abiogenesis are currently occurring, it is a very new field, and experiments are disproving certain avenues and promoting others. The very act of defining the theory is demonstrating that it is falsifiable as research disproves hypotheses. So that one is falsifiable. Then we have what you call biological evolution, which shows your prejudice, because it's just called evolution. That is also easily falsifiable; show me two organisms with the same DNA but different genetic traits, but a Google search will provide you more possibilities for falsifying evolution. Actually better still show me a duck that gave birth to a crocodile, that would certainly falsify evolution. Unfortunately for you both are falsifiable and reality doesn't conform to your scientific illiteracy.
@S Gloobal Young Earth creationist pseudo scientist kinds, repeatedly attempt to falsify evolution by natural selection, and they, ... FAIL! These kinds (the stupid branch of humans arising from the Ark sub-population) will continue to attempt falsification of evolutionary biology, not because they are convinced they are right, but rather because their claims keep money rolling in from S Gloobalites! You do have a frequent flyer pass to the Ark Encounter do you not?
It is fantastic to see a Christian who will stand beside an Atheist to listen to the lies told by creationism and call it for what it is, in a polite way of course
It was interesting to hear him embrace termites as signs of God, too. I like when faith evolves to embrace science instead of doubling down on suppressing science.
Indeed, it is nice to see a scientifically minded theist, however, I'm curious about how much cognitive dissonance is needed to be so scientifically literate while believing in magical super beings...
There are lots of scientists that happen to be Christian. And a lot of those scientists also happen to believe in evolution and an old Earth. Why? It's because when they walk into a lab to do their research they leave their religion at the door. What they're doing is practicing the scientific method and only going where the evidence leads.
@@JGM0JGM There were versions of Christianity originally and versions of religion now that don't involve belief in a magical super being. Granted, it's the prevailing view in the US, but it's not the only view.
@@Cat_Woods Are you saying that there are Christians who don't believe in God?
@10:00 i think their point is
1. evolution is a simple process and therefore must produce simple cells.
2. The observation that cells can be complex.
3. Therefore evolution didn't produce these cells.
Their flaw is the premise. They are strawman-ing what evolution is. They simply deny intermediates and assume that all solutions within evolution must be simple. Im pretty sure they didn't contradict themselves.
@Stefan Dingenouts maybe. But rather than potentially strawman them, its better to take the high ground - summarise their arguments as honestly as possible. And then, (still easily) show how they are wrong.
The Three Stooges, Paul that is priceless.
Ken finally said something we can all agree on.
Woop woop woop woop.
Any similarity between Ken Ham and The Three Stooges is an insult to Moe, Larry and Curly.
"That's not a compliment."
Sometimes the truth is harsh.
The Three Stooges had better jokes than Answers News does.
@@scienceexplains302 oooo, good point, that fan is being soooooooooo disrespectful... To The Three Stooges.
First
:P
Damnit Shannon!
I'm calling it, this competition was unfair and Shannon had inside knowledge of the completion that gave an unfair advantage.
Creepy stalker lol
why do creationist always say random chemical reactions when we know what chemical reaction are most likely to happen given we know the chemicals and the enviornment they are in?
Yeah they are not random when we kinda have oh I don't know chemical formulas to show how something is going to react with chemical equations. None of it is random. Did they all fail chemistry?
Taking advantage to the multiple meanings of "random" (unpredictable vs chaotic)
Nice to see Sy Garte putting AiG straight on a few things. So good to have someone saying it is ok to be a Christian and let science be science.
Tbf, being a Christian requires chucking science out the window on more than just biology. It requires stating that there is a supernatural not subject to the natural.
26:42 the strange thing about “pineapple turning into an elephant” is that acceptance of evolution would effectivly switch places between the two groups.
Those who don’t understand evolution, and propose this one-liner, say they would accept evolution should this occur.
At the same time, those who understand evolution, and accept its conclusions would effectivly consider evolution falsified and no longer accept it.
True. I think I'd assume we were in a simulation or something if I saw a pineapple turn into an elephant.
"Darwinism leads to eugenics..." Suffering Jesus! Eugenics in the USA peaked in the early 1900's. Religiosity was at an all-time high back then! Georgia is lucky that irony is not carcinogenic, or she would be toast.
Nothing against Sy Garte but when I saw the thumbnail I thought it was Bill Ludlow for a moment. :-(
I miss him.
Me too.
The second coming is "just a theory". No one alive observed the first one, and so far, no repeatability.
life IS 'meaningless', and 'purposeless'-
and it IS great!
it's wonderful to exist under such unlikely circumstances.
celebrate everything!
Believe it or not, for an amateur like me starting to study trees and tree pathology, it takes my breath away and make me cry every time I go out. I'm an atheist. But there is something "spiritual" about a beautiful linden in bloom, and then to document the mite galls on the leaves (they are tiny and other worldly), and know that the tree is perfectly happy with the mites. And a tree in its way is its own ecosystem. Trees are wonderful. When I'm depressed, I go out and lean on my favorite box elder. And I know it doesn't care, because it's not a caring thing, it's a tree-ing thing. But I find comfort. No god, no salvation. Just the beauty of trees and my good fortune to see to take part in that.
It's bad enough when people get science wrong but it is worse when they actually believe they are right and teach others. 6:19 if God created all this then there would be no errors.
Sy is the man!
Sy Ten right? 😀
@@Imrightyourewrong1 Sye Ten Bruggencate? ;)
#askPaulogia why are there no new apologetics for God in general? For instance, William Lane Craig's seven points where all named and debunked before he was born.
Ooooohhhh Ham and AiGs! Oooooohhh!
The reason why Leonardo Da Vinci failed to popularize his helicopter is because he didn't invent helicopter pilots.
Don't understand how anyone can think that science proves God. And if it did, why the Christian God? Just goes to show, religion can make smart people dumb.
No, no, no, no no.
Guys.
YOU are the ones that are being incorrect.
You see, YOU think that "PERFECT" means " without error".
BUUUUUUUUUT
You forget.
Creationists love to change the meaning of words to suit whatever they want it to mean at the moment.
To them.
"PERFECT" often just means" works sufficiently".
I have run into this several times.
A creationists makes a claim that creationism is true because thing X is "perfect".
When I point out that thing X is not " without error" they retort that " it works" so , it is " perfect".
But are they switching definitions because that's the only way they can get it to work (in their mind alone) or because that's actually how the argument is supposed to work?
#askPaulogia While it’s known for Christians pray before eating, do that pray when they poop?
Paulogia, that was excellent, having a real genetic biologist, who is Christian, well Sy was great, especially when he said you leave your religion outside of the lab! 👏😘💖☮️🎃
Thanks, Laura
I Wish they weren't so hypocrite and allowed comments on their channels lol 🤣
Ray Comfort allows comments on his channels
💚 *quality content* 💚
I have heard "life is meaningless" many times, from creationists. Your life is just a unimaginably short trial-period where you do only one thing that matters: you accept God or don't. All your joy, suffering, pain, love and learning you experience -- all of your personality -- doesn't mean anything; your whole life on Earth devolves down to you arriving at the Gates of Heaven with nothing but your name followed by a check mark or an X. That's it.
But God is omniscient, your life is not a trial period, God knows how you will turn out before you were even born, whether or not you will accept him.
Oh, and the _afterlife_ of creationists is meaningless as well. What do they _do_ in Heaven? Work with the other saved souls to make Heaven a better place? That can't be done, because it's already perfect. Anything anyone actually _does_ in Heaven must have zero effect to preserve that perfection. Thus everyone there has a completely meaningless afterlife, for _eternity._ Just like Hell.
What about the droid attack of the Wookies? #askpaulogia
When you click on the video and there are 3 likes as well as 3 comments, would you also feel obligated to add not just to one but both? ^_^
Neither.🤔
Great video! Having Sy describe the things the way he did was excellent.Also Paul with your input made it very easy to understand.Keep up the awesome work!
I feel like i'm learning about genetics from Al Franken. I mean, if we can't have him in the Senate...
Q) What's the difference between the Creation Museum and the Flintstone Museum?
A) I'd actually pay to see the Flintstone Museum.
We need more people like this man. When I was a Christian I tried to grasp the most knowledge I could about these matters because I believed it was all the work of God and it made me infinitely curious. These people like Kent are just willfully ignorant (or cons)
#askPaulogia what are your thoughts on the seventh day adventist faith? Perhaps you could do a video on their amazing facts channels which is lead by Pr Doug Batchelor.
Other popular SDA channels include:
- The forerunner777
- Hope through prophecy
- Bible flock box
- David asscherick
- three angels broadcast network
Or any of their prophecy based beliefs
I didn't know Bible Flock Box was 7th Day Adventist. That explains so much.
@@NotGoodAtNamingThings he always references the "amazing facts" so I figured he is an SDA.
What do you mean?
@@markdacey2333 - I've found members of that group to hold many beliefs that cannot be sorted by any reasonable facts.
@@NotGoodAtNamingThings name some...
@@markdacey2333 - Are you 7th Day Adventist? Why do you care? For an example, Ben Carson has a lot of very strange beliefs. Look up his beliefs about the pyramids of Egypt for just one example. To support his young Earth beliefs, he has to believe all kinds of crazy things.
Good to get to know an interesting Christian scientist. Now, thanks to the recommendation machine, I'm off to watch him debate Aron Ra. Should be fun.
#askPaulogia what are your thoughts on Ron wyatt? Especially his claims about the blood sample (supposedly from Jesus christ) on the ark of the covernant.
I know this is my second question but he is someone who I have just recently found out about.
I still identify as a Christian and his claims are dubious
Ths idea that science takes the beauty out of things is ridiculous. The fact that I know how refraction works doesn't make a rainbow any less beautiful, AND now I know how to make one whenever I want. So bonus!
If people like Ken Ham ruled the world we would be back to the Dark Ages so fast.
Good to see Christians and atheists working together! Nice video, Paul and Sy.
3:40 Jesus. I can practically _hear_ Georgia's brain picturing a *garden **_genome_* just from the way she can't pronounce genome.
Emphasis on "practically". There's a significant missing component that prevents that actually occurring. The clever reader will figure out the joke/insult on their own from here.
#askPaulogia Can Good be a designer? For me that part is stupid, when Dev create game and it cruch, he re do it remove errors and start over, so when Adam ate the fruit, it shoul be instant reboot. And even if not a reset with new parameters, he deemed Adam and Eve as a disregarted broken pieces of his project, then why is he even bothering with them and their children? And if you say, no he want to give them a chance, than remember that he does reboots, small like Sodom and Gomor, and big like Flood, so why not start over from the begining?
Also remember, that every tribe and person they kill, it is still a part of their familie from Adam, and leater Noah, and I do not get how nations who know for sure god is real from their parents Adam, and Noah and still so easy invent new gods, even after seeing his power with Moses and the plagues, it take tham less than no time after Moses go up hill, to invent and pray to Gold Calf.
I really want to ask Sy does he apply these same rules to his belief in a god? Why does he believe in god? It makes no sense. Hard to wrap my head around a mind that thinks critically and looks for demonstrable answers to things and yet believes in something that is not demonstrable. 😄🤔😳
Ah, yes... So the perfect creator created an imperfect mechanism to imperfectly repair damaged imperfect structures within imperfect creatures. Perfection, put a bow on it.
Kudos to the guest for saying that Ken Ham-type BS doesn't just hurt science, it hurts religion.
Amazing ! On their own stage AIG has just proven the truth of evolution. Before our very eyes Bodie and Georgia have evolved into lap dogs for Ken. Paul, your presentations are always top-notch and many thanks to your guest for sharing his knowledge with us.
But that's micro evolution. Macro evolution would be if they turned into actual dogs /s
Remember everybody : Theist Scientist is not an oxymoron : Creation Scientist is an oxymoron
I love this video and it's amazing to see Christian scientists talk about evolution
This was really cool Sye is awesome 😎
Paulogia, you cook Ham and aigs with the most politely operated flame thrower.
I’ve been watching too many of these in a row. Now I can’t stop singing “ham & eggs 🎵, ham & eggs 🎵, flip’em flop’em flip’em flop’em 🎵 HAM & eggs 🎵”
if you call it a convention, you can have normal church but charge an entrance fee in addition to asking for an offering
#askpaulogia (my very first hashtag. I hate you for that! [disclaimer: that may/may not be true] ) Do the various protestant/evangelical offshoots/catholics/orthodox/coptic/etc. versions of christianity think of each other as heretical? If not, why not? If the point of all these denominations is that they have a different theology, eschatology, ontology, christology, morphology, etymology, entomology, who knows what else(?), yet they can all be christians then all of those above named -ologies don't actually matter and so there shouldn't be denominations. If those things are actually fundamental to getting into heaven, then everyone who disagrees with you should burn forevermore in the sulphur and brimestone adjacent areas of hell, no?
In fact that is one of the reasons why there are so many schizms in Christianity.
Timely, I'm 150 pages into Richard Dawkins, Greatest Show on Earth, Evidence for Evolution. Thanks Paulogia.
#askPaulogia should Pascal wager be change? If the Theist part assume good and bad place, but you cant be sure which "good entity" there is, should they rather seek favor from "evil entity", so not to be torture to extrime. Like Christian denominations, they have different ways to go to haven, but they still have only one hell and one Devil.
Adam Lukasik -- thanks for that idea. I have never heard it before. I.e., no one can know which dogma is correct, which means there's no guarantee of paradise. So the safest option is to make a deal with the devil. Love it. I might actually try that with the next Evangelical I meet.
The shear amount of disinfo from the religious crowd infuriates me. That your guest is still a Christian after seeing proof that the bible lies, is just so depressing. He knows the bible is wrong. Yet he still believes in what's in the bible. Seriously. WTF?!
Did you happen to catch the subtitle of his book?! "A Scientist's Journey from Atheist to Faith" Kinda depressing isn't it? He saw the evidence and somehow, magically, it convinced him there IS a god. I hate to pull what some would call a "No True Scotsman", but that just isn't the way "atheism" works.
**lays an egg**
There :P I gave birth to an egg.
Egg: walks away.
Me: o_O
Great video! I never heard of your guest till today. You gave me homework to do, thx
That "cancer" text at 6:55 looks like the error model from Source engine games
AiG: please check you degree at the door.
I grew up believing what Ken Ham taught.
Took so long to get that poison out of my mind. I am turning 30 in a few days, but only recently really & fully confronted those beliefs.
Recently found this channel, and love the content and the guests. I bought Sy's book as soon as you mentioned it.
Paul, watch out. I love the merch, but I'm willing to bet Ken will demand $ compensation for likeness. But hey, what can ya expect from a money grubbing charlatan?! 😄
One thing I particularly enjoyed about this video is the way Sy stressed a point I, as a sociologist, am quick to make is that religion and science answer fundamentally different questions. Science answers "how does this work?" questions, while religion answers "why do things (including people) exist?" questions.
Confusing the two does no good to either.
I think it’s really commendable that you are willing to partner with a theist on common grounds in such a respectable way. As a (just recently) former theist, it’s comforting to see we can all get along as long as the search for truth is the goal. Kudos.
Ooh. Knowing things kills our joy. Don't tell god.
A guy on twitter was using "Semantic Information" to make the argument new information didn't exist.
AIG bringing together Christians and atheists to mock AIG
#askpaulogia what do you think about progressive Christianity? Or the versions represented by the likes of Paul Enns, Randall Rauser, or John Dominic Crossan? Coming from a fundamentalist background I have the hardest time with this.
Rauser is progressive???
But...LOOK AT THE TERMITES!!!!
When do you consider somethings alive, when I was in school I was taught viruses were not alive is this still the consensus? #askPaulogia
Over halfway through the video. Thank you for bringing a Christian geneticist onto this in order to refute YEC crap.
lol Ken Ham. Help.
I had to study him and Hovind... IN FKN SCIENCE CLASS. It was a christian school. They hated evolution.
They're both so easy to debunk tho anyone new should be practising on them.
Hello. I was directed to your Channel by a UA-cam Atheist and the title of this video interested me. I have a UA-cam channel as well and was wondering if you would be interested in a discussion in this area. You can invite Mr. Garte to join you if you wish. Btw, your videos are superbly done. I wish I had your creativity. Thanks!
What an awesome video Paulogia! I would love to see Sye educate some of the creationist trolls in your comment section 😄
Watched all of it
Ja-gnome
Tetrahydrocannabinol exe yeah - that irritated me, too - and she has a legitimate doctorate in genetics 🙄
There is an impressive amount of work to get the science completely wrong, mixed with a large dose of denial, to produce this liathon. If you wouldn't mind keeping Ken Hambone in your country, Australia for the most part would be grateful.
Paulogia, it sounds like this guy, while in partial agreement with evolutionist science, also disagrees with a HUGE amount of evolutionary science, such as that Chimps and Humans are "related" -- and thus our evolutionary ancestor, essentially "did give birth to other species" -- provable via fuse Chromosome 2, ERV's, and much else.
I'd like to see you break down his beliefs more, and explore his rationale for rejecting the evolutionary theories of common ancestry.
"Yes it (science) does (rob us of the joy of celebrating life)." - Dr. Georgia Purdom AIG... A self-professed Scientist and Christian. So she will be happy to give up her doctorate in Molecular Genetics from THE Ohio State University. Since science makes people miserable, by her logic, she'd be better off without it.
😬 It's weird watching this in October 2020.
AiG: We're having a conference.
Me: Haha, nope.
Paul: I'm going to be at the athiest conference in June in Austin.
Me (sadly): Nope
Sye: Epidemiologists study past outbreak data, they don't reproduce it.
Me: They sure have enough to study from this year!
Bodie: Coronavirus
Me: 😬
Okay, this one has been bugging me for YEARS, and as a former Young Earth Creationist, maybe you could answer this for me. So, let's grant, just for this question, that the Bible is true, everything Christians say is true, no contradictions in the Bible, God is a fact and he makes appearances somewhat regularly. God is all good, all loving, and would never do anything bad ever. Still with me? So then, why when you say someone is "God fearing", is that a compliment? This is a lawful good, all loving deity who wants only the best for you at all times. If you're a good christian, why would you EVER fear God? Why is the phrase 'God Fearing Christian' and not 'God Fearing Atheist', which would still be wrong, but make FAR more sense? Please explain this to me. #askpaulogia
#askPaulogia What "brand" or denomination of Christian were you, and what did you used think about the other denominations like catholics, mormons, JW's etc. interpretations of what god wanted? For example were you taught all denominations destined for heaven or was it only your version?
What's the point of making up words like "young Earth creationizm" / "young Earth creationist"? Although English is my third language, I'm aware of the older terms that fit perfectly : "Bullshit" and "Idiot".
This whole thing is analogous to talking about pauls ride to Damascus arguing "yeah, but you can not explain how god used dust to make Adam, you just have no answer.". 😐😐😐😐😐😐 no kidding... Sometimes I really want to flip the script and SHOW them how dumb it sounds. They still won't get it.
#askPaulogia ... Paul, I enjoy listening to your videos. I am curious if you would be interested in interacting with Christian faith from a subjective perspective rather than an objective perspective. For example, someone saying, "I believe in the resurrection of Jesus because it inspires me (subjective)," rather than the status quo Christian apologetic, "I believe in the resurrection of Jesus because of 'proofs'(x)(y)(z) (objective)."