This is such a misleading title. This is not about Elon Musk's ego... ... It's actually a very revealing account about how OpenAI started, and where it is today. I share the same questions as Mr. Musk around 'how can an open sourced, non-profit company suddenly becomes closed sourced, and for profit?'. What happened here is actually alarming.
lol Elon repeated twice that OpenAI would not exist without him but the truth is, Sam Altman used to be CEO of YC and he is worth about 2 billions so he could have done it without Elon, which is exactly what he did in the end. Now regarding the open vs close source and the for profit vs non profit, the truth is, things change, you might start a project with a certain funding model but then you realize it's not viable.
@@jean-philThings don’t change from “non-profit” to for profit. Except greed. Because Sam chose this position, we are off to the races with Sam having a great head start. Not to worry. Elon will win. He always wins. He’s convinced all intelligent execs to leave. Grok 3 will surpass chat by 1/25-2/25 and Sam will disappear like Kamala.
I just read on openai all the private emails between musk and sam and between the 2 the one to trust least seems to be Elon. Elon is also the best, between the 2, at manipulating. Go read all the material. Sam actually did exactly what Musk wanted to do, Musk is lying when he says publicly that he wanted to keep it non-profit.
I took an entrepreneurship class at UCLA where the professor actually recommended starting the business as a non-profit and switching to C-corp status once the business is on the cusp of being cash-flow positive. Business 101.
"Imagine founding a non-profit to save the rainforest, and it turns into a for-profit logging company in that rainforest". Are there laws to prevent this? Nope. Should have gotten yourself a seat on the board to retain some control of your project.
considering Musk's incredible mistake with offering to buy Twitter and his surprise at not being able to back out, he sure does not seem like a very bright guy .
@@RedCaynor lmao you think paying 44 billion for twitter was a good idea 😂. Elon could of easily paid half of that for openAI. You are as much of a genius as Elon lol
It is happening folks, the future of work is being redesigned. Yes, More tech companies wants to fire more workers from next week: "The third wave is going to happen next week. That affects everybody in the biz teams, including in my organization. It's just a time of great anxiety and uncertainty" Says Meta President.
Time and tide will not wait for any person. That means we must pay attention to how new technologies, and specifically AI, will make it easier for companies to become more efficient. Simply, this companies may not need a lot of workers, your bank may not need many staff. Your insurer may not need many workers. And the list keeps growing.
Is it time to require mandatory payment where even if you have no staff, you have to commit a certain percentage of your revenue which will be used to distribute to citizens as a "wage" alternative?
It has nothing to do with AI. Economic distress in America is enormous. Many banks have gone under. Inflation is biting harder. Ukraine miscalculation is obvious. Facebook has been using AI in most of its features and products for more than 15 years now, so Ai has nothing to do with it. They embarked on unprofitable projects. And over hired. Apple has never laid off employees despite the economic downturn. They did well in hiring and never had failed projects. Metaverse failed. Gaming projects failed. Fintech, Lira failed. In the last 20 months, Sanbberg left, nobody is there to "tam the lion" Most Tech companies went woke: hired talents in order to prevent competitors from having access, they kept them idle, just to hijack a pool of talent. Over hired without proper assessment and protection. The existing projects couldn't turn in expected revenue, even before inflation war in USA set it. Let's put it in perspective without blaming AI. 95% of big tech have been using AI in the last 15 years. My advice: Improvise, Build passive income as a personal hedge against inflation. Do not hesitate to ask question where common knowledge fails.
@@debrab7844 I wish I could tackle your submission but I already threw in the towel before I read the last line. I give it to you on this. I'm very interested in building a passive income but it seems like I will be needing a lot of coaching as I'm just a noob. You seem very well knowledgeable in the field, can you give some tips on getting started on building passive income with an expert firm or rec0mmend a personal flnancial coach?
@@donnaDi-p9r " Kathleen Carol Yanelli " will be a good fit for you if you are looking to get unique financial strategies to generate passive income. She has a web presence incase you wanna just go ahead and search for her name.
Surprisingly, this video gives a lot more clarity to what is going on behind the scenes at OpenAI! Ilya came aboard OpenAI reluctantly, only agreeing because he thought it would be non-profit and bring about AGI for humanity safely. Now the company has gone so far off its original mission, it seems everything from Sam Altman being fired to Microsoft not being consulted about it makes sense.
Have you run non-profit technical companies? It's difficult to get enough money to just literally keep the lights on. You are pretty much forced into a for profit blend. The alternative would be large government funding that enabled SpaceX and Tesla, but Elon probably and his alt-R boiz especially oppose.
@@JJ-ix4zr Yea but as a result of the 700/770 employees protesting his firing, Satya Nadella hiring Altman and any people who quit OpenAI, Microsoft basically forced the boards hand - not to say some of the concerns of AGI aren't valid but not consulting a 49% owner before firing the CEO is stupid.
There's a documentary/Interview of Ilya. And he's too concerned about the wrong use of AGI as Elon is. Elon, Ilya and Geoffrey Hinton whose worked led the foundation of the AI boom we're witnessing towards are all in the same page and their concern is super valid. It has spearheaded a new race. And with the advancements in Quantum Computers this will make the period to achieve AGI even more shorter because AGI will not run on normal computers it's the Quantum Computers who will evenly have the original capacity to cater the computing power needed to run a full fledged AGI.
@@pcodes they can be worried as much as they want but the reality is that, if USA does not develop it, another country like China will do it. It's the same as the nuclear bomb. Imagine if Germany had developed it first ...
Even worse than MS cutting off OpenAI, MS could demand bias in the training to lean towards some profit goal. And since it is protected/closed, no one would be able to infer it without some legal junction.
It's Microsoft, before their PR campaign to make Bill Gates look like a kind old grandpa they were well known as the most evil megacorp of the 90s and early 2000s. If Elon's serious about AI safety he needs to start over from scratch and make a new open AI and do better this time.
It's not so uncommon as many think. A lot of research in all fields be it CS, machine engineering, medicine, biotech, pharma is done by non-profit/state universities or research institutes. When something valuable is found, its spin-off into a private for profit company or existing company buys the IP. Those deals are always in favor of the investors.
Well, fortunately the other open-source projects are catching up pretty rapidly. It's a few companies against a large group of well intended researchers and engineers. Unless there's some shady government intervention, they should eventually triumph
@@saraseado3729 the main ones right now are LAION OpenAssistant (available now) and StableLM from Stability AI (7B model available now with 165B model coming later)
“well intended researchers and engineers” that train image generators using databases of billions of copyrighted images taken without the author’s permission. That’s a very ethic birth for AI.
They might not have what they have today if they had remained open source and non-profit. Without money, you cannot build something so big, folks. When they became famous, Elon started criticizing them, but they had been closed source for many years before that.
Elon also paid to be officially recognized as a "Founder" of Tesla, even though he joined the company the year after by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning.started it. Now he says Open AI was all because of him without crediting Sam Altman and the 10 other founders. That said, his point about the switch from not-for-profit to FOR PROFIT and comparison to the Amazon Rain Forest is valid.
Elon taking all the credit for a project other people have done for 8 years is remarkable. They did it before they met him as a world renowned specialists, they are doing well without him, yet he believes it wouldn't exist if not for his effort.
@Mark Hall and it's also not like all the biggest names in the AI development wouldn't be able to pull 50 mil. Some of them made millions just working at google
@Mark Hall I don't see what you try to argue about, I said the same thing. If you didn't get it, I said, that the only thing Elon Musk did was giving 50 mil, which is nothing for the tech world and they would totally be capable to raise it themselves
"At any point Microsoft could cut off OpenAI". And they do have a track record of doing just that. Look at Sybase and SQL Server and other such examples where Ms had a partnership and then decided "I'll take that, thanks for your time".
Although I think some of his concerns are real, I can't help but think there is a different motive here. It sounds to me like he's hurt and the call for regulation is to slow down innovation so he can catch up with his own competing product. He has the money and people to work within any regulations the government imposes.
Well said but I can't quite figure out what he has in mind. Are one of his companies working with Large Language Models? Neuralink and Tesla Bot is a joke, right? Is he just jealous?
That's exactly why we're seeing a push from these companies to be regulated. Companies don't want to be regulated unless it's beneficial for them. This is being done to try and squash open source and keep the tech in the hands of the companies. That leaked Google doc showed their real concern.... "But the uncomfortable truth is, we aren’t positioned to win this arms race and neither is OpenAI. While we’ve been squabbling, a third faction has been quietly eating our lunch. I’m talking, of course, about open source."
@@olat1809 Yeah, in theory it's like that but in practice it's actually very quick ever since the Llama model was leaked. Open source are catching up at a faster rate than Google or OpenAI, it was revealed in the leaked document from Google.
They cannot beat the open source community. It's the world vs those companies... Google an OpenAI knows this , they will try to monetize in some other ways in the long run
He can start again. Like Jack dorsey could make twitter 2.0 blue sky. He's done it. Just do it again. Like elon could do PayPal 2.0 but better called x. He could definitely do another open Ai. To compete with this one. Its not like he can't. But he's never gonna establish 100% safety in anything. Life's so not safe you could die from SID. Or sleeping. Or just no reason. Heart stopped. Done.
He won't do that, I don't think he believes in the concept of open-source given his penchant for making lots of money from other people's work and ideas. That's his whole grifting game, the guy is a master con-artist
@@jx__xj6308 actually I think he should use tesla patent as a source of income for employee benefits. Every penny generated from tesla patent goes into free tesla family benefits and facilities. That would be great to keep good people around
You work for 40yrs to have $1m in your retirement, Meanwhile some people are putting just $10k in a meme coin for just few months and now they are multimillionaires.I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life
I urge everyone to start somewhere now no matter how small, this is literally the time for that, forget material things, don't get tempted,i became more better the moment i realized this
Her good works and consistent speak of her, I'm also a huge beneficiary of Mrs Melissa price, keep on earning 35k dollars every 5days with her trading platform.
Even with the economic recession and downturn. I'm so happy I've been earning $60,000 Returns from my $8000 investment on short term with Mrs Melissa price MP
I've had a lot of losses trading on my own... I trade ok on demo but I think the real market is being manipulated... Can anyone help me or at least tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Trading with an expert is the best strategy for newbies and busy investors who have little or no time to monitor trade.. I will advice you to stop trading on your own it's very risky. Seek advice of a professional trader
Bullish or bearish, AI stocks will still dominate 2024, even beyond. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long-term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
I agree, just because the market presents opportunities doesn't mean we should rush in headfirst. For this reason, we should look for appropriate market analysis or guidance or seek advice from certified market strategists.
@@WaldronsSousas No doubt, having the right plan is invaluable, my portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit a 100% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, tho this could take till Q3 2024.
@NebiheVergara Can you share details of your advisor? I want to invest my increased cash flow in stocks and alternative assets to achieve financial goals.
@@JeffreysSuttons There are many independent advisors to choose from. But I work with MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY and we've been working together for almost four years and she's fantastic. You could pursue her if she meets your requirements. I agree with her.
@NebiheVergara I appreciate this. After curiously searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get.
I'm guessing DOD/DARPA stepped in and quietly 'ousted' him while orchestrating the 'open to closed' transition - which isn't even legal, by the way (the idea of non-profit becoming for-profit). Doesn't anybody remember Bell Labs? History repeating it's self.
@Edward Martin Really? Do I have to say it? Lightbulbs are not the same thing as AGI. Maybe we can finally do away with that dreadful phrase, "apples and oranges"... I think "lightbulbs and robots" makes more sense, at least for scale's sake.
Where did he say that? He literally said "I was instrumental in recruiting the key scientists and engineers." That's what he does. That's what he always does. "Ilya joining was the lynchpin." But keep bleating your falsehoods.
@@Zero11_ss He didn't say he did any of the work, he said he gave them 50million dollars and it wouldn't exist without him. That can be checked and contradicted so it probably is true.
@@archvaldor "That can be checked and contradicted so it is probably true" is an extremely poor way to approach the world. Most of what Trump says can be checked and contradicted too...
2:28 Elon Musk: So part of it also in the beginning, I thought, look, this is probably a hopeless endeavour How could OpenAI possibly compete with Google Deepmind? This seems like an ant against an elephant
Yes, indeed the scariest prospect of all is an AI surreptitiously taking over the infrastructure of a "legitimate" company like MS over a period of months or years, embedding itself in a latent state, and then one fine day "going live with Skynet". The hubristic humans at MS would never have a clue it was happening (nor admit to it even if they did), and to the outside world it would all seem to have been human-initiated activity...and by the time anyone caught on, it would be too late.
I think you're on the right track, but I'm not worried about it. I'm here for it. Corpos, govt, society already treat us like disposable SSNs. Let AI blow it up for all I care. Let's see what happens -- interesting times to live in.
Honestly, just happy the likes of Elon, Sam, et al bother to take the time to talk to anyone and answer questions in a public forum. It takes courage to willingly be vulnerable, esp when you know you're going to be attacked no matter what you say. They can not win, yet they choose to still engage and speak their minds. They don't HAVE to engage w/the public at large and "show up" but I'm glad they're driven to (not bothered by their motivations). Conversations w/them are important.
No, Elon Musk is not the reason why artificial intelligence (AI) exists. AI has a long history that predates Elon Musk's involvement. The field of AI emerged in the 1950s and has since evolved through the contributions of numerous researchers, scientists, and engineers. While Elon Musk has made significant contributions to the development of AI and has been a prominent advocate for responsible AI research, he is not solely responsible for its existence. Musk has invested in AI-related ventures, such as Tesla's Autopilot and OpenAI, and has expressed concerns about the potential risks of unchecked AI development. However, AI would still exist and continue to progress even if Musk had not been involved. It's important to recognize that AI is a result of collective efforts from researchers, institutions, and the broader scientific community over many decades, rather than being attributed to any single individual. - chat gpt
@@arandomperson7811 You can criticize a wealthy person without being wealthy. You can criticize a movie without being a director. You can criticize a penalty without being an athlete etc etc....
Reminds me of a piece in the bible relating to the tower of Babel. It was said that God and the angels looked down at mans abilitlies. God said, "Eventually they could do anything", "Lets confuse their languages to make them stop". Exactly why this occured I don't really understand, but it does make one think that the creator could allways stop the actions of the created. Man, as its creator should have no problem shutting down, regulating and generally keeping AI in check. But then again, who's to say that the Tower of Babel occurance wasn't really a profecy to do with what man is doing right now? Who knows..
The face of jealousy. I think Elon wishes he wholly owned OpenAi. He took his eyes off the ball, it's not like anyone prevented him from having control or being an active investor.
@OsamaBinLadensSecondGirlfriend Why? You don't understand general AI at all do you? Drones have already been able to make it's own decisions when it comes to military based on previous programming, but the fact that it can make decisions is a precursor to being able to think for itself once general AI takes over, which it will inevitably.
Google closed source AI? Bruh, the reason ChatGPT exists is because the researchers at Google Brain published the transformer paper for the whole world. Now Google is becoming more reserved in what they publish after the wake up call from OpenAI.
@@smjarvis1234 while I agree with you in general, this is definitely more nuanced here and the truth is somewhere in between. Imagine Google came up with the recipe to make concrete. So yes, because of that OpenAI was able to make New York City skyscrapers.
That isn't making any sense. If this was so substantial, Google would've been the leader. This is as ridiculous as all those copyright claims on songs that have the same or similar sequences of a few chords in it.
Wrong. OpenAI got the user interface correct. Google has already almost caught up with Bard. They are only behind because they haven't done the manual curation of training their model as thoroughly as OpenAI.
@@YeeLeeHaw Just because you invented a building block, doesn't mean somebody else won't implement the next step better than you -- will use the block better than you. This happens all the time.
Uncle E is changing the future and if you hating you sitting on that couch and posting comments while Uncle E is working ridiculous hours and helping with changing the future so please let Uncle E keep doing him and helping to better the environment and the innovation for the people and future generations
Seems Elon has a $50 million legal matter concerning Open AI as the name implies "OPEN" non profit should not be private for profit and now a microsoft product.
@@verticalfracture Microsoft get's 75% of Open A.I.'s profit until their investment is repaid (rumored to be $10 billion) and they have 49% stake in the whole company. The licensing deal you reference is related to an older deal from 2020, and is a license for GPT-3 specifically.
00:01 OpenAI's early contributor donated $50 million 00:40 The conversation was about the danger of AI 01:19 OpenAI is concerned about AI safety 02:04 Closed source for profit can be dangerous 02:43 OpenAI's competition with Google's DeepMind seemed like an elephant, not a contest. 03:32 OpenAI's transition to for-profit closed source is disappointing 04:14 Starting a nonprofit and transferring IP to a for-profit may be legal. 04:44 Concerns about Microsoft's control over OpenAI's digital super intelligence
you must also then love the way he is looting every individuals wealth and time, working overtime himself to produce 2 or more babies with random women and hoard all wealth. Handing his own kids Math books while handing you and your kids Twitter and rubbish and fake Electric cars with fake driverless tech. Overworking good engineers to fly rockets then firing all of them (like someone I know) when the job is done and he can offer private flights to Billionaries for pay. He is one of the worst people ever. He does not care 2 hoots for ANYONE.
Correction: I'm one of the reasons why openAi exists. And I'm one of the reasons why openai is so successful today. I left the company at the right time without harming it. ~The real iron man
Fate loves irony, as is so I actually created openai in 2014 when I applied for an accelerator program at ycombinator. Got rejected but apparently they loved the idea lmao
For a contrarian view, I think it is possible the reason they have may switched to a for profit model is they believe that the technology is in the asymptotic phase and completely new ideas are needed.
Elon Musk at 2:13 : "I fully admit to being a huge idiot here." People who absolutely love Elon Musk: "That's actually one of the smartest things he's ever said." People who absolutely hate Elon Musk: "That's actually one of the smartest things he's ever said."
When he says "I'm the reason OpenAI exists" he doesn't mean he had anything to do with it, he means he gave some people money and desperately needs credit (just like how he isn't actually a Tesla founder)
Elon's money was bolstering the company, Eberhard's decisions would have run the company into the ground. Elon took what Eberhard was screwing up and turned it into the Tesla we know today.
@@northofeden1802 he deserves no credit. He didn't invent AI, only had money to throw around. Watch him tell you that he invented Twitter. I'm calling it.
Please how do i find a secure online investment platform where a professional trader or fund manager can trade on my behalf and make consistent returns, as i have been holding cryptocurrency for some time and am currently losing money.
@Sophia Henry She trades for me too. My first investment with mrs Annabelle gave me profit over $25,576 and ever since then I trade with her and it has been a good turn up
@@metageist666 Buddy, it may be that Tesla is bigger than OpenAI now. But in another five years, OpenAI will be the biggest and most revolutionizing company in the world. And Elon Musk definitely wants a piece of the cake.
He doesn't need to solidify his name in history. That's pretty much a done deal. So why would he be concerned with A.I.? And if you've been following Elon Musk you know he has been talking about A.I. for the last 10 years at least.
When Ai software starts doing things for itself without input, then we will have a problem. It is the developers of Ai that we need to worry about now, and what they make the Ai capable of doing.
Elon Musk said that I am the reason OpenAI and ChatGPT exist. I agree with that because it was his vision, efforts, and financial support that made these projects a reality. Without his money and resources, nothing would have come to fruition. He laid the foundation for the development of artificial intelligence, and people like me created the demand for these technologies, striving for new knowledge and solutions. OpenAI and ChatGPT emerged because we wanted tools to overcome challenges and find answers. Musk inspired this progress, and my interests and needs made it relevant. It is exactly these kinds of demands that drive technologies and help them evolve to serve people.
Musk was raised in a home that had black servants who were legally classified as inferior to him. The parents created a social bubble to shield their children from the horrible truth. While Musk may have left South Africa as a teen to escape Apartheid, he may never have escaped the mindset, the sense of superiority and and getting your inferiors to serve you. And there are some strong suggestions by Musk himself that he still holds racist beliefs.
….I am more and more an overall fan of Elon musk. He has said a few things lately that are just fantastic. Strangely humble while boastful…..brilliant and uber capitalist but yet has made enemies with same because he values HUMANS more than machines…..and last he just quoted the princess bride which, well, that’s awesome. Given his frustration with OpenAI going to FOR profit via microsoft, he should get with TUSK and GIPPR
Very grateful for the sincerity and super happy if capable, trustworthy and genuine professionals would all work together with you to ensure AI benefits humanity🙏
Martin Eberhard created Tesla, then Elon Musk took ownership of the company and grew it into a household name. Elon Musk created OpenAI, then Sam Altman took ownership of the company and grew it into a household name. Food for Thought.
The interviewer seems clueless as to what Elon is saying. Elon is not focusing on the money. The key words he's saying are Open Source, Critical Talent and more importantly Saving Humanity from rogue AI. Elon really has amazing patience with people given the intellectual he is 💖. He does make quick corporate decisions for efficiency sake and does confront dictators and narcissists. 💖.
@@idontcare2508 Yes you do, because everything A.I creates is based off work of other people with 0 influence of its surroundings or experiences. Whereas human creativity uses much more than just influence to bring ideas to fruition.
Well u can get to specific point with chatgpt in terms of gaining knowledge. But true creativity lies beyond it. For example: I asked gpt if "zero" is possible outside mathematics. It answers yes and said there is absolute zero temperature, if u don't have any knowledge about a subject, it means you have zero knowledge. Then I told it that zero temperature doesn't exist and no one can have zero knowledge about a anything. Even if it is 0.00000001% it is still not Zero. Do u get what I am trying to prove ?
Also I asked open AI what does 2+2 mean. It said 4. I asked it whether 2+2 always mean 4. It said yes, it said it's impossible to have anything except 4. Then I told it that in terms of quantum bits, 2+2 can have many different outcomes outside of 4. Then it said " I was talking about Classical mathematics, In quantum mathmetics 2+2 can have 0,1,2,3 any number of outcomes depending on the state of the qbits, but quantum physics cannot translate to classical reality and research is undergoing". U get what I am showing to you. It's just a stupid overpriced computer having no intelligence of its own.
If you are prepared to break new ground making mistakes is a given. Commercialisation is always the end game for something to become sustainable. The mistake was not having the legals in place but hindsight is always 20 20 when you are sitting in the backseat and not actually doing the noble work of pioneering the innovation. Great interview 👍
This is such a misleading title. This is not about Elon Musk's ego...
... It's actually a very revealing account about how OpenAI started, and where it is today. I share the same questions as Mr. Musk around 'how can an open sourced, non-profit company suddenly becomes closed sourced, and for profit?'. What happened here is actually alarming.
lol Elon repeated twice that OpenAI would not exist without him but the truth is, Sam Altman used to be CEO of YC and he is worth about 2 billions so he could have done it without Elon, which is exactly what he did in the end. Now regarding the open vs close source and the for profit vs non profit, the truth is, things change, you might start a project with a certain funding model but then you realize it's not viable.
@@jean-phil it seems to me that muskrat just angry that he is in fact no longer in conrol..
@@jean-philThings don’t change from “non-profit” to for profit. Except greed. Because Sam chose this position, we are off to the races with Sam having a great head start. Not to worry. Elon will win. He always wins. He’s convinced all intelligent execs to leave. Grok 3 will surpass chat by 1/25-2/25 and Sam will disappear like Kamala.
I just read on openai all the private emails between musk and sam and between the 2 the one to trust least seems to be Elon. Elon is also the best, between the 2, at manipulating. Go read all the material. Sam actually did exactly what Musk wanted to do, Musk is lying when he says publicly that he wanted to keep it non-profit.
I took an entrepreneurship class at UCLA where the professor actually recommended starting the business as a non-profit and switching to C-corp status once the business is on the cusp of being cash-flow positive. Business 101.
Amazing
That’s such a loophole, but hey that’s the classic “hate the game, not the player”
Exactly.
Developers, developers developers, DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS YEeess!
ULCA is not the place to find ethics.
"Imagine founding a non-profit to save the rainforest, and it turns into a for-profit logging company in that rainforest".
Are there laws to prevent this?
Nope. Should have gotten yourself a seat on the board to retain some control of your project.
considering Musk's incredible mistake with offering to buy Twitter and his surprise at not being able to back out, he sure does not seem like a very bright guy .
Very wow 😮
yea, he probably didn't try to retain some control because he thought it was a hopeless endeavour at the beginning
He said it at 2:28
@@superblondeDotOrg nothing dumber has ever been said than what you just said
@@RedCaynor lmao you think paying 44 billion for twitter was a good idea 😂. Elon could of easily paid half of that for openAI. You are as much of a genius as Elon lol
It is happening folks, the future of work is being redesigned. Yes, More tech companies wants to fire more workers from next week: "The third wave is going to happen next week. That affects everybody in the biz teams, including in my organization. It's just a time of great anxiety and uncertainty" Says Meta President.
Time and tide will not wait for any person. That means we must pay attention to how new technologies, and specifically AI, will make it easier for companies to become more efficient. Simply, this companies may not need a lot of workers, your bank may not need many staff. Your insurer may not need many workers. And the list keeps growing.
Is it time to require mandatory payment where even if you have no staff, you have to commit a certain percentage of your revenue which will be used to distribute to citizens as a "wage" alternative?
It has nothing to do with AI. Economic distress in America is enormous. Many banks have gone under. Inflation is biting harder. Ukraine miscalculation is obvious. Facebook has been using AI in most of its features and products for more than 15 years now, so Ai has nothing to do with it. They embarked on unprofitable projects. And over hired. Apple has never laid off employees despite the economic downturn. They did well in hiring and never had failed projects. Metaverse failed. Gaming projects failed. Fintech, Lira failed. In the last 20 months, Sanbberg left, nobody is there to "tam the lion"
Most Tech companies went woke: hired talents in order to prevent competitors from having access, they kept them idle, just to hijack a pool of talent. Over hired without proper assessment and protection. The existing projects couldn't turn in expected revenue, even before inflation war in USA set it. Let's put it in perspective without blaming AI. 95% of big tech have been using AI in the last 15 years. My advice: Improvise, Build passive income as a personal hedge against inflation. Do not hesitate to ask question where common knowledge fails.
@@debrab7844 I wish I could tackle your submission but I already threw in the towel before I read the last line. I give it to you on this. I'm very interested in building a passive income but it seems like I will be needing a lot of coaching as I'm just a noob. You seem very well knowledgeable in the field, can you give some tips on getting started on building passive income with an expert firm or rec0mmend a personal flnancial coach?
@@donnaDi-p9r " Kathleen Carol Yanelli " will be a good fit for you if you are looking to get unique financial strategies to generate passive income. She has a web presence incase you wanna just go ahead and search for her name.
Surprisingly, this video gives a lot more clarity to what is going on behind the scenes at OpenAI! Ilya came aboard OpenAI reluctantly, only agreeing because he thought it would be non-profit and bring about AGI for humanity safely. Now the company has gone so far off its original mission, it seems everything from Sam Altman being fired to Microsoft not being consulted about it makes sense.
He is rehired again.
Have you run non-profit technical companies? It's difficult to get enough money to just literally keep the lights on. You are pretty much forced into a for profit blend. The alternative would be large government funding that enabled SpaceX and Tesla, but Elon probably and his alt-R boiz especially oppose.
@@JJ-ix4zr Yea but as a result of the 700/770 employees protesting his firing, Satya Nadella hiring Altman and any people who quit OpenAI, Microsoft basically forced the boards hand - not to say some of the concerns of AGI aren't valid but not consulting a 49% owner before firing the CEO is stupid.
There's a documentary/Interview of Ilya. And he's too concerned about the wrong use of AGI as Elon is. Elon, Ilya and Geoffrey Hinton whose worked led the foundation of the AI boom we're witnessing towards are all in the same page and their concern is super valid. It has spearheaded a new race. And with the advancements in Quantum Computers this will make the period to achieve AGI even more shorter because AGI will not run on normal computers it's the Quantum Computers who will evenly have the original capacity to cater the computing power needed to run a full fledged AGI.
@@pcodes they can be worried as much as they want but the reality is that, if USA does not develop it, another country like China will do it. It's the same as the nuclear bomb. Imagine if Germany had developed it first ...
Even worse than MS cutting off OpenAI, MS could demand bias in the training to lean towards some profit goal. And since it is protected/closed, no one would be able to infer it without some legal junction.
Even worse - they could give it bias towards certain ideologies, including political
@Jayden Lawson yeah coz Elon is not going to do that😂
@@JaydenLawson could? Go ask it any question about negative statistics in the liberal side. It's already done.
It's Microsoft, before their PR campaign to make Bill Gates look like a kind old grandpa they were well known as the most evil megacorp of the 90s and early 2000s.
If Elon's serious about AI safety he needs to start over from scratch and make a new open AI and do better this time.
@@jakesiu7773 long ago
It's not so uncommon as many think. A lot of research in all fields be it CS, machine engineering, medicine, biotech, pharma is done by non-profit/state universities or research institutes. When something valuable is found, its spin-off into a private for profit company or existing company buys the IP. Those deals are always in favor of the investors.
Capitalists taking advantage of socialism
cheap, passionate, student research labor. fresh minds and fresh talent. perfect for recruiters
the world wide web did not so not everything that has value ends up in for profit schemes
I'm guessing FSD is open source and free...oh wait
@@synapticure A non-profit that had to change its Business model to survive, a totally logical move on their part. What exactly is the issue here??
When you take Microsoft's money you belong to Microsoft.
Bill was willing to give away a chunk of MSFT for the chance to guard the transformer.
The real question is: who does Microsoft belong to? Epstein is one clue.
HAHAHAH! BUY HIM OUT BOYS! BUY HIM OUT! -Bill Gates, Simpsons, 1996
That applies to everything including taking money from 😢 elon
Not necessarily. They'd like to try but not legally speaking assuming what happened is as you state it.
Well, fortunately the other open-source projects are catching up pretty rapidly. It's a few companies against a large group of well intended researchers and engineers. Unless there's some shady government intervention, they should eventually triumph
what other projects?
I heard this many times but can't find any of them
@@saraseado3729 private GPT is a nice one
Oggabooga, WizardLM 13B uncensored, Vicuna, Stable Diffusion, etc. etc.
@@saraseado3729 the main ones right now are LAION OpenAssistant (available now) and StableLM from Stability AI (7B model available now with 165B model coming later)
“well intended researchers and engineers” that train image generators using databases of billions of copyrighted images taken without the author’s permission.
That’s a very ethic birth for AI.
They might not have what they have today if they had remained open source and non-profit. Without money, you cannot build something so big, folks. When they became famous, Elon started criticizing them, but they had been closed source for many years before that.
Open-source does not equate "without money".
They are now getting into defense! Same old corporate crap after all the gibrish
That look at 2:08? "Boss, I did it! I asked him the embarassing question you wanted me to ask"
wtf was that
creepy
what americans do to have the raise in corpo
😂
And Elons response was so funny 😂
Elon wasn't the sole investor though; it's not like he and only he has a say in where the company goes and what the company does.
He cannot accept that OpenAI got close to Microsoft (which microsoft practically owns the company now)
@@gold9994 Sam Altman is virus, which you will see in coming world!
@@gold9994 Exactly, it sounds like Tesla coming up with something and Edison totally ripping it off. I'm sure Tesla also couldn't accept it.
50M is a soul buddy 😅😅 a soul I repeat
Elon also paid to be officially recognized as a "Founder" of Tesla, even though he joined the company the year after by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning.started it. Now he says Open AI was all because of him without crediting Sam Altman and the 10 other founders. That said, his point about the switch from not-for-profit to FOR PROFIT and comparison to the Amazon Rain Forest is valid.
Damn that Amazon rainforest analogy was spot on
💯
Yup, they sold their soul…
Except it's not. ChatGPT is nothing like chopping down a rainforest - use your head
Except it is. Microsoft will skew the responses to fall more in line with their profit incentives. Don't be naive
And Elon is the competing lumber company upset that his scam didn't pan out the way he had hoped.
Elon taking all the credit for a project other people have done for 8 years is remarkable. They did it before they met him as a world renowned specialists, they are doing well without him, yet he believes it wouldn't exist if not for his effort.
@Mark Hall people wouldn't work on it for free
@Mark Hall and it's also not like all the biggest names in the AI development wouldn't be able to pull 50 mil. Some of them made millions just working at google
@Mark Hall I don't see what you try to argue about, I said the same thing. If you didn't get it, I said, that the only thing Elon Musk did was giving 50 mil, which is nothing for the tech world and they would totally be capable to raise it themselves
@Mark Hall In this particular setting - I utterly agree. In general, I'm not sure it's always true
Al Gore invented the internet and Elon Musk invented AI.
"At any point Microsoft could cut off OpenAI". And they do have a track record of doing just that. Look at Sybase and SQL Server and other such examples where Ms had a partnership and then decided "I'll take that, thanks for your time".
Although I think some of his concerns are real, I can't help but think there is a different motive here. It sounds to me like he's hurt and the call for regulation is to slow down innovation so he can catch up with his own competing product. He has the money and people to work within any regulations the government imposes.
No doubt 100%
Yes, exactly and that’s why I say sour grapes for the musk melon.
He has had the same opinion about the dangers of AI, since before he gave money to openAI.
Well said but I can't quite figure out what he has in mind. Are one of his companies working with Large Language Models? Neuralink and Tesla Bot is a joke, right? Is he just jealous?
That's exactly why we're seeing a push from these companies to be regulated. Companies don't want to be regulated unless it's beneficial for them. This is being done to try and squash open source and keep the tech in the hands of the companies. That leaked Google doc showed their real concern....
"But the uncomfortable truth is, we aren’t positioned to win this arms race and neither is OpenAI. While we’ve been squabbling, a third faction has been quietly eating our lunch.
I’m talking, of course, about open source."
He should continue to support open source projects, they are growing at a faster rate, you can have another openAI in 3 months with GPT5 qualities
Like you know how complex it really is?
@@olat1809 what? Supporting open source projects?
@@DJPapzin i mean how complex the process is for the people working on the open source project, building from scratch takes time
@@olat1809 Yeah, in theory it's like that but in practice it's actually very quick ever since the Llama model was leaked. Open source are catching up at a faster rate than Google or OpenAI, it was revealed in the leaked document from Google.
They cannot beat the open source community. It's the world vs those companies...
Google an OpenAI knows this , they will try to monetize in some other ways in the long run
He could easily support true open-source A.I. projects like OpenAssistant, etc. and hopefully make those the leader.
He can start again. Like Jack dorsey could make twitter 2.0 blue sky. He's done it. Just do it again. Like elon could do PayPal 2.0 but better called x. He could definitely do another open Ai. To compete with this one. Its not like he can't. But he's never gonna establish 100% safety in anything. Life's so not safe you could die from SID. Or sleeping. Or just no reason. Heart stopped. Done.
@@adrianaadnan9958 L take
He won't do that, I don't think he believes in the concept of open-source given his penchant for making lots of money from other people's work and ideas. That's his whole grifting game, the guy is a master con-artist
@@jx__xj6308 actually I think he should use tesla patent as a source of income for employee benefits. Every penny generated from tesla patent goes into free tesla family benefits and facilities. That would be great to keep good people around
@@jx__xj6308 who pooped in your cheerios?
You work for 40yrs to have $1m in your retirement, Meanwhile some people are putting just $10k in a meme coin for just few months and now they are multimillionaires.I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life
Starting early is the best way of getting ahead to build wealth,
investing remains a priority.
I urge everyone to start somewhere now no matter how small, this is literally the time for that, forget material things, don't get tempted,i became more better the moment i realized this
Talking abot been successful. I know I am blessed if not I wouldn't have met someone who is as spectacular as Mrs Melissa price MP
Her good works and consistent speak of her, I'm also a huge beneficiary of Mrs Melissa price, keep on earning 35k dollars every 5days with her trading platform.
Even with the economic recession and downturn. I'm so happy I've been earning $60,000 Returns from my $8000 investment on short term with Mrs Melissa price MP
And Sam is out at OpenAI. Elon was right.
and hired by Microsoft hahaha
and now he is back hahaha@@gr93cjs
Aaaaand he's back, and so is Greg. Unsure about Ilya...he's the critical lynch pin for the success of OpenAI
@user-pp5cm1sc7x I think it is very clear that Microsoft has full control of OpenAI 😅
I've had a lot of losses trading on my own... I trade ok on demo but I think the real market is being manipulated... Can anyone help me or at least tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Trading with an expert is the best strategy for newbies and busy investors who have little or no time to monitor trade.. I will advice you to stop trading on your own it's very risky. Seek advice of a professional trader
I lost £1200 carelessly trading on a
platform then I was referred to Mrs Diane she recovered the loss and made an extra profit of £4600
You don't need to be shock because I'm also a huge beneficiary of expert Mrs
Diane
I'm so happy for taking the bold step in working and investing $2000 with Expert Mrs Diane Walter after a week I received $19,680 to my bank
Here in Canada Expert Mrs Diane carries out the both orientation and mentorship
potentials
Bullish or bearish, AI stocks will still dominate 2024, even beyond. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long-term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
I agree, just because the market presents opportunities doesn't mean we should rush in headfirst. For this reason, we should look for appropriate market analysis or guidance or seek advice from certified market strategists.
@@WaldronsSousas No doubt, having the right plan is invaluable, my portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit a 100% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, tho this could take till Q3 2024.
@NebiheVergara Can you share details of your advisor? I want to invest my increased cash flow in stocks and alternative assets to achieve financial goals.
@@JeffreysSuttons There are many independent advisors to choose from. But I work with MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY and we've been working together for almost four years and she's fantastic. You could pursue her if she meets your requirements. I agree with her.
@NebiheVergara I appreciate this. After curiously searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get.
Sour grapes for Musk.
He’s worth 200 plus billion how is it sour grapes lol ? He built a electric revolution he’s a modern day genius
I'm guessing DOD/DARPA stepped in and quietly 'ousted' him while orchestrating the 'open to closed' transition - which isn't even legal, by the way (the idea of non-profit becoming for-profit). Doesn't anybody remember Bell Labs? History repeating it's self.
@Edward Martin Really? Do I have to say it? Lightbulbs are not the same thing as AGI. Maybe we can finally do away with that dreadful phrase, "apples and oranges"... I think "lightbulbs and robots" makes more sense, at least for scale's sake.
@Edward Martin
Thomas edison was a great man who had a business savvy that tesla did not.
@@southpawslugger8819 Greed! These guys are never satisfied with what they have. He's no longer the center of attention. Open AI is!
Man hit bullseye in the end 🎯
😂
The hubris is astounding. In his mind he didn’t buy anything, he invented everything.
It sure does work for him.
Where did he say that? He literally said "I was instrumental in recruiting the key scientists and engineers." That's what he does. That's what he always does.
"Ilya joining was the lynchpin."
But keep bleating your falsehoods.
@@dannyarcher6370 he also claims he founded paypal and tesla, look into it
He should fund huggingface a true open ai and machine learning community
He wont be able to pretend he did all the work there then - which is his only real goal.
@@Zero11_ss elon says all the time he hires the best minds. Where has he stated he did it all by himself?
@@Zero11_ss He didn't say he did any of the work, he said he gave them 50million dollars and it wouldn't exist without him. That can be checked and contradicted so it probably is true.
Yes. Nobody else had $50 million in the world at that time nor was anyone else interested in AI. Just like Tesla didn't exist before h.. oh right
@@archvaldor "That can be checked and contradicted so it is probably true" is an extremely poor way to approach the world. Most of what Trump says can be checked and contradicted too...
Is there a link to the full interview?
Give him credit for OpenAi. Otherwise, he will suffocate himself to death.
You missed the point man
In hindsight, this Interview seems gold.
the side eye at 2:08 destroyed me 🤣
"It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug".
3 months to go then, make the most of the final summer.
"But alas, twas too late."
Spooky
Where’s this quote from
@@expressfashionman89 terminator 2
2:28 Elon Musk: So part of it also in the beginning, I thought, look, this is probably a hopeless endeavour
How could OpenAI possibly compete with Google Deepmind? This seems like an ant against an elephant
I Love Elon Musk.
Elon Musk AND Sam Altman they both are hero
How?
Honestly, great points being made here. Not an Elon fan, but he speaks truth.
If he speaks truth, then why aren't you a fan?
The fact that a human can accuse another human of being a "speciest" is insanity.
Shows you where they're brain is.
Call him a machiniest
On the long run. I'd be more concerned of AI taking over Microsoft than Microsoft taking over AI.
Yes, indeed the scariest prospect of all is an AI surreptitiously taking over the infrastructure of a "legitimate" company like MS over a period of months or years, embedding itself in a latent state, and then one fine day "going live with Skynet". The hubristic humans at MS would never have a clue it was happening (nor admit to it even if they did), and to the outside world it would all seem to have been human-initiated activity...and by the time anyone caught on, it would be too late.
I also think the same. This has a higher possibility of becoming true.
I think you're on the right track, but I'm not worried about it. I'm here for it.
Corpos, govt, society already treat us like disposable SSNs. Let AI blow it up for all I care. Let's see what happens -- interesting times to live in.
Honestly, just happy the likes of Elon, Sam, et al bother to take the time to talk to anyone and answer questions in a public forum. It takes courage to willingly be vulnerable, esp when you know you're going to be attacked no matter what you say. They can not win, yet they choose to still engage and speak their minds. They don't HAVE to engage w/the public at large and "show up" but I'm glad they're driven to (not bothered by their motivations). Conversations w/them are important.
Musk doesn't have conversations he has pr manipulation sessions or stock market manipulation
No, Elon Musk is not the reason why artificial intelligence (AI) exists. AI has a long history that predates Elon Musk's involvement. The field of AI emerged in the 1950s and has since evolved through the contributions of numerous researchers, scientists, and engineers.
While Elon Musk has made significant contributions to the development of AI and has been a prominent advocate for responsible AI research, he is not solely responsible for its existence. Musk has invested in AI-related ventures, such as Tesla's Autopilot and OpenAI, and has expressed concerns about the potential risks of unchecked AI development. However, AI would still exist and continue to progress even if Musk had not been involved.
It's important to recognize that AI is a result of collective efforts from researchers, institutions, and the broader scientific community over many decades, rather than being attributed to any single individual.
- chat gpt
He is a narcissist
OpenAI is a company that Elon Musk started. he didnt say he invented AI.
@@archivez101 and u broke lol
@@arandomperson7811 You can criticize a wealthy person without being wealthy. You can criticize a movie without being a director. You can criticize a penalty without being an athlete etc etc....
@@blob2092 that guy doesnt even know the words meaning lol
Reminds me of a piece in the bible relating to the tower of Babel.
It was said that God and the angels looked down at mans abilitlies.
God said, "Eventually they could do anything",
"Lets confuse their languages to make them stop".
Exactly why this occured I don't really understand, but it does make one
think that the creator could allways stop the actions of the created.
Man, as its creator should have no problem shutting down, regulating and
generally keeping AI in check.
But then again, who's to say that the Tower of Babel occurance wasn't
really a profecy to do with what man is doing right now?
Who knows..
The face of jealousy. I think Elon wishes he wholly owned OpenAi. He took his eyes off the ball, it's not like anyone prevented him from having control or being an active investor.
Exactly what it is
He has Twitter. Way savvier purchase. 😂
Lol this sounds like the beginning of a terminator movie
@OsamaBinLadensSecondGirlfriend Why? You don't understand general AI at all do you? Drones have already been able to make it's own decisions when it comes to military based on previous programming, but the fact that it can make decisions is a precursor to being able to think for itself once general AI takes over, which it will inevitably.
@@VerisimilitudeDude I think the drone thing was fake
The greatest threat to humans are other humans exploiting technologies for bad. Not the technologies themselves.
Google closed source AI? Bruh, the reason ChatGPT exists is because the researchers at Google Brain published the transformer paper for the whole world. Now Google is becoming more reserved in what they publish after the wake up call from OpenAI.
That’s a bit like saying Google published a recipe to make bricks so therefore OpenAI was able to make New York City.
@@smjarvis1234 while I agree with you in general, this is definitely more nuanced here and the truth is somewhere in between. Imagine Google came up with the recipe to make concrete. So yes, because of that OpenAI was able to make New York City skyscrapers.
That isn't making any sense. If this was so substantial, Google would've been the leader. This is as ridiculous as all those copyright claims on songs that have the same or similar sequences of a few chords in it.
Wrong. OpenAI got the user interface correct. Google has already almost caught up with Bard. They are only behind because they haven't done the manual curation of training their model as thoroughly as OpenAI.
@@YeeLeeHaw Just because you invented a building block, doesn't mean somebody else won't implement the next step better than you -- will use the block better than you. This happens all the time.
wow - gotta respect Elon - I don't always agree with everything he does or says - but oh boy he gets my respect here.
Uncle E is changing the future and if you hating you sitting on that couch and posting comments while Uncle E is working ridiculous hours and helping with changing the future so please let Uncle E keep doing him and helping to better the environment and the innovation for the people and future generations
He made some excellent points
The love for this guy is unsettling.
Its love for his ideals
Seems Elon has a $50 million legal matter concerning Open AI as the name implies "OPEN" non profit should not be private for profit and now a microsoft product.
He was given first shot at Series 1 funding same as Microsoft. Also Microsoft doesn't own it they license the tech.
@@verticalfracture Microsoft get's 75% of Open A.I.'s profit until their investment is repaid (rumored to be $10 billion) and they have 49% stake in the whole company.
The licensing deal you reference is related to an older deal from 2020, and is a license for GPT-3 specifically.
Seems you don't know even remotely what you're talking about. I hope nobody corrects you.
00:01 OpenAI's early contributor donated $50 million
00:40 The conversation was about the danger of AI
01:19 OpenAI is concerned about AI safety
02:04 Closed source for profit can be dangerous
02:43 OpenAI's competition with Google's DeepMind seemed like an elephant, not a contest.
03:32 OpenAI's transition to for-profit closed source is disappointing
04:14 Starting a nonprofit and transferring IP to a for-profit may be legal.
04:44 Concerns about Microsoft's control over OpenAI's digital super intelligence
😂😂😂 I love the way this dude explains stuff
you must also then love the way he is looting every individuals wealth and time, working overtime himself to produce 2 or more babies with random women and hoard all wealth. Handing his own kids Math books while handing you and your kids Twitter and rubbish and fake Electric cars with fake driverless tech. Overworking good engineers to fly rockets then firing all of them (like someone I know) when the job is done and he can offer private flights to Billionaries for pay. He is one of the worst people ever. He does not care 2 hoots for ANYONE.
Correction: I'm one of the reasons why openAi exists.
And I'm one of the reasons why openai is so successful today. I left the company at the right time without harming it.
~The real iron man
You clearly didn't get the point of the video.
@@nexovec You clearly didn't get the point of the comment.
@Newtube_Channel How is it the same tech that's used in self-driving cars? LLMs are totally different than the type of AI that goes into self-driving.
Fate loves irony, as is so I actually created openai in 2014 when I applied for an accelerator program at ycombinator. Got rejected but apparently they loved the idea lmao
the theft is real
They paid you for the Brand name ?
More believable than Elon creating anything.
They even stole your first name
I was there actually day before you, with the same exact idea.
For a contrarian view, I think it is possible the reason they have may switched to a for profit model is they believe that the technology is in the asymptotic phase and completely new ideas are needed.
He needs to sue the doc that did those hair plugs, woof.
More people need to see this
Correction:
" I am the reason OPenAI exists"
-Souja Boy
One of the few billionaires that admit when they are an idiot - and thus trust in him is stronger than others.
OpenAI is basically free education.
Elon: I’m the reason OpenAI exists
Walter: No. I am the one who knocks!
Elon’s biggest mistake will be leaving OpenAi, history will remember Sam Altman more
WOW! This aged well...
The amount of times Musk stutters in an interview is insane. It’s such a pain
quality of intelligent people
Very nice interview. Asking questions that actually matter
Elon Musk at 2:13 : "I fully admit to being a huge idiot here."
People who absolutely love Elon Musk: "That's actually one of the smartest things he's ever said."
People who absolutely hate Elon Musk: "That's actually one of the smartest things he's ever said."
Elon Musk: did I stutter?
interviewer: yes a lot
Ok but turning it into a capped profit company is the reason ChatGPT exists.
it's the reason it was published, yeah. but that's different. it took years and years to develop
When he says "I'm the reason OpenAI exists" he doesn't mean he had anything to do with it, he means he gave some people money and desperately needs credit (just like how he isn't actually a Tesla founder)
Your problem is jealousy.
@@venturestar Nah he or she is telling facts.
Elon's money was bolstering the company, Eberhard's decisions would have run the company into the ground. Elon took what Eberhard was screwing up and turned it into the Tesla we know today.
It was Al Gore who invented the internet, though. Checkmate, Elon.
@@mikicerise6250 What have you invented? Al Gore was right about the environment and Elon Musk has done something about it. What are you doing?
Elon Musk: I am the reason life exist.
except all he said was i am the reason open A.I exists, and then backed it up with facts.
@@northofeden1802 he deserves no credit. He didn't invent AI, only had money to throw around. Watch him tell you that he invented Twitter. I'm calling it.
@@procheathepitai are you saying that elon can't code or what?
David Faber asked every question with such disdain. I think it’s obvious how he feels about Elon Musk.
Finally an interviewer that Musk doesn't have to spank in front of God, Queen and Country XD
Please how do i find a secure online investment platform where a professional trader or fund manager can trade on my behalf and make consistent returns, as i have been holding cryptocurrency for some time and am currently losing money.
@Sophia Henry She trades for me too. My first investment with mrs Annabelle gave me profit over $25,576 and ever since then I trade with her and it has been a good turn up
ChatGPT said you contributed money. So be happy Chat exists and move on.
As much as I love Elon Musk this sounds as he wants to solidify his name in History of AI
Elon Musk needs his name on a plaque in Sam's building to feel accomplished while running Tesla, the biggest AI/Robotics company on the planet?
@@metageist666 Buddy, it may be that Tesla is bigger than OpenAI now. But in another five years, OpenAI will be the biggest and most revolutionizing company in the world. And Elon Musk definitely wants a piece of the cake.
He doesn't need to solidify his name in history. That's pretty much a done deal. So why would he be concerned with A.I.? And if you've been following Elon Musk you know he has been talking about A.I. for the last 10 years at least.
Emotional thought
Musk starting OpenAI was already common knowledge. He's just repeating it for people who don't follow the tech world closely
Elon = Beyond Genius as human being. Lives out his dreams creating new technology 🚀 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼
He's such a narcissist.
Agreed. And this network gave him food to feed.
When Ai software starts doing things for itself without input, then we will have a problem. It is the developers of Ai that we need to worry about now, and what they make the Ai capable of doing.
already does so, it couldnt solve a captcha and it autonomously sent a request to mechanical turk for a human to solve the captcha
😆
Elon Musk saying I am the reason OpenAI exists is like Obama saying I am the reason SpaceX exists.
He didn’t say that
@@hiramrosajr8231 That's exactly what he said few days ago on that CNBC interview.
Elon Musk said that I am the reason OpenAI and ChatGPT exist. I agree with that because it was his vision, efforts, and financial support that made these projects a reality. Without his money and resources, nothing would have come to fruition. He laid the foundation for the development of artificial intelligence, and people like me created the demand for these technologies, striving for new knowledge and solutions.
OpenAI and ChatGPT emerged because we wanted tools to overcome challenges and find answers. Musk inspired this progress, and my interests and needs made it relevant. It is exactly these kinds of demands that drive technologies and help them evolve to serve people.
Musk was raised in a home that had black servants who were legally classified as inferior to him. The parents created a social bubble to shield their children from the horrible truth. While Musk may have left South Africa as a teen to escape Apartheid, he may never have escaped the mindset, the sense of superiority and and getting your inferiors to serve you. And there are some strong suggestions by Musk himself that he still holds racist beliefs.
‘Fate loves irony…next level’ 😂 …true
The reason nobody's talking about Tesla AI is because he's probably years behind like he is on everything else. He is my favorite con man though.
lol
….I am more and more an overall fan of Elon musk. He has said a few things lately that are just fantastic. Strangely humble while boastful…..brilliant and uber capitalist but yet has made enemies with same because he values HUMANS more than machines…..and last he just quoted the princess bride which, well, that’s awesome.
Given his frustration with OpenAI going to FOR profit via microsoft, he should get with TUSK and GIPPR
2:02 lol "should there have been government oversight?" 2 seconds... 5 seconds... 10 seconds... LIBERTARIAN FREE MARKET BRAIN IMPLODES.
Who's here after the Sam Altman drama?
Oh boy 😂
Very grateful for the sincerity and super happy if capable, trustworthy and genuine professionals would all work together with you to ensure AI benefits humanity🙏
Martin Eberhard created Tesla, then Elon Musk took ownership of the company and grew it into a household name.
Elon Musk created OpenAI, then Sam Altman took ownership of the company and grew it into a household name.
Food for Thought.
Brilliant observation! I totally agree.
Eberhard lied to Elon about the numbers and would have bankrupted the company.
The interviewer seems clueless as to what Elon is saying.
Elon is not focusing on the money. The key words he's saying are Open Source, Critical Talent and more importantly Saving Humanity from rogue AI.
Elon really has amazing patience with people given the intellectual he is 💖. He does make quick corporate decisions for efficiency sake and does confront dictators and narcissists. 💖.
The ant is one of the mightiest species on earth. Far more likely to exist longer than elephants.
Wonder what Elon is thinking now that Sam is fired from OpenAi
Why do we still care about what this guy thinks. It's been shown he is not a genius, but is very good at grifting off people who are
Thankyou
Thanks for your love care and support, it's my pleasure talking to you here. Where are you from?
Musk: I am the reason my mom exists
Elon was correct toward the end there. Microsoft took over.
Slight difference is OpenAI had an implosion from removing a CEO a lot of the employee base believed in.
Open AI should be there for ever, it takes the creativity to the next level.
Takes ... Or takes away the creativity, away from Humans
Creativity is a pillar of consciousness. A.I is not conscious, therefore not creative.
@@idontcare2508 Yes you do, because everything A.I creates is based off work of other people with 0 influence of its surroundings or experiences. Whereas human creativity uses much more than just influence to bring ideas to fruition.
Well u can get to specific point with chatgpt in terms of gaining knowledge. But true creativity lies beyond it. For example: I asked gpt if "zero" is possible outside mathematics. It answers yes and said there is absolute zero temperature, if u don't have any knowledge about a subject, it means you have zero knowledge. Then I told it that zero temperature doesn't exist and no one can have zero knowledge about a anything. Even if it is 0.00000001% it is still not Zero. Do u get what I am trying to prove ?
Also I asked open AI what does 2+2 mean. It said 4. I asked it whether 2+2 always mean 4. It said yes, it said it's impossible to have anything except 4. Then I told it that in terms of quantum bits, 2+2 can have many different outcomes outside of 4. Then it said " I was talking about Classical mathematics, In quantum mathmetics 2+2 can have 0,1,2,3 any number of outcomes depending on the state of the qbits, but quantum physics cannot translate to classical reality and research is undergoing". U get what I am showing to you. It's just a stupid overpriced computer having no intelligence of its own.
Sybase coordinated with MS and then MS replicate to be SQLSERVER. OpenAI could have the same fate.
Where is Larry Page anyway?
Enjoying his life away from the spotlight
My Big Elon Musk.
Thanks for your love care and support, it's my pleasure talking to you here. Where are you from?
If you are prepared to break new ground making mistakes is a given.
Commercialisation is always the end game for something to become sustainable. The mistake was not having the legals in place but hindsight is always 20 20 when you are sitting in the backseat and not actually doing the noble work of pioneering the innovation. Great interview 👍
How long before Elon tries to convince his minions that he invented AI!
????
His minions are largely 'ESFP', and other ENTP - especially those with narcissitic personality disorder.
6 months later, proven that elon musk was right, all the time