Shootout: Voigtländer 40mm Nokton f1.2 E vs Nokton f1.4 VM on Sony A7III
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 кві 2020
- I am comparing the Voigtlander 40mm Nokton f1.2 E-Mount Aspherical vs the 40mm Nokton f1.4 MC VM-Mount.
www.voigtlaender.de/lenses/e-...
www.voigtlaender.de/lenses/vm... - Наука та технологія
Please stay consistent which lens is on the left or right. Much easier on the viewer if lens A is always on the left and lens B always on the right. Other than that, I very much appreciate that you did this comparison.
You can put a close focus adapter on the leica lens which will make it way more versatile
Excellent review - very informative. I would go for the Sony version due to exif data, shorter focusing distance and the adapter requirement.
The exposure on the 1.4 looks a little brighter when you shoot the books and pendant. Maybe that's why it looks less contrasty.
Outstanding comparison!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m having a hard time letting go the e mount version. I recently picked up a bessa r3a and Nokton classic 1.4 lens.
With the Vm mount you can use techart pro and you get af, eye af and exif, you just do not get f stop
Yes that's what I think would convince me to get the m mount. I prefer native mount when it comes to autofocus lenses. For a manual lens I'm not sure I trust my eyesight at wide open aperture. Using a techart gives the option of autofocus.
I bought the VM1.4 in 2015 for my Sony A7 alongside a Leitz 90/2.8
I bought the E1.2 a few years ago. I still have both! But I prefer to use the E even if the VM does look much better!
Thanks for this informative video. I already have the f1.4 and I was wondering if it was worth upgrading. I would say, probably not based on this. It would be a different question if I didn’t have either.
how did you get f number from the VM lens into the exif files. I use the 35 1.4 VM on my sony and it always shows nothings for f stop
It's not possible to do that in camera. I just named every single photo in Lightroom to keep an overview.
Thanks for this review
I now prefer staying with my m mount version 😬😬😬😬
thanks
That have no sens but i realy love the 1.4 MC, he have a realy powerfull caractère and whith lightroom, the default can deseaper if we want.
isn’t the vignetting difference due to correction vs. no correction (because no contacts/exif in the adapted lens)?
There was no correction applied in Lightroom .
Frankfurt 🤩
Hi, is Voigtländer Nokton 40mm 1.4 + leica T = good pairing?
Will it become manual mode bec lens is manual ??
I m using it for portrait photography.
Thanks Guru for your advice!!! 😄
Hi!
It is a good pairing but you need an adapter from t to m-mount and there will be a crop of 1.5x. So 40mm becomes 60mm equivalent.
If you can live with that it’s a great and affordable manual lens. The voigtlanders are all manual lenses.
The 1.2 has a dof of f4 and the 1.4 has a dof of 2.8...theys or 2 different lenses whit the same FL. (not the same karakter)..i have most of the nokton line-up to tell you that the 1.4 is a classic lens and renders different then the 1.2. The de rendering of the 1.2 is more of the same in the nokton line-up..so the redering of the 1.2 wil be the same on all noktons (NOT classic). the main reason why it has a close focus of 0.7m is do to parallax issues on rangefinder camera's (m-mount is rangefinder).