Das Diorama ist derartig lebendig gestaltet,das ist absolut beeindruckend. Auch die Idee der Szene ist genial,die beschädigte notgelandete Maschine wirkt richtig echt. Eine kleine Kritik hab ich,nicht böse sein. Dieser Pilot wurde nicht abgeschossen und die Bf109G6 die er flog hatte eine Galland-Haube. Frohe Ostern und wirklich eine tolle Arbeit.
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback! Ja, du hast absolut recht! Und möge mir Franz Dörr verzeihen! Lassen Sie es mich kurz erklären: Der Revell-Bausatz war nicht sehr gut, und ich habe mich entschieden, ihn mit allen verfügbaren Aufklebern zu verwenden ... ja, das war's. (und mit einer Hüttenlaterne - das wusste ich einfach nicht 🤷🏻♂️) Ja, das ist historisch gesehen ungenau - danke für die Korrektur!) 🤝
See a lot of these, and at first glance, they are spectacular, but as an aircraft nut, the more I look, the more I find w̶r̶o̶n̶g̶ in error. These errors usually involve the aircraft itself. First off, it's location. How did it get to where it is, which way was it coming, where is the impact point, distance travelled from impact point and the resultant damage (or lack thereof) from the deceleration. Then there is the overall damage. The bullet holes just look like a hot wire pushed into the plastic, not cannon shells shattering and ripping up aluminium. What caused the wing to break the way it did (rock, tree, etc) and why did it break at that point? An impact hard enough to cause that much deflection in a wing would have almost sheared it off at the root. Nine times out of ten, when an aircraft like that came to rest, the elevators would be hanging down. A side note for the 109 series is that most had leading edge slats, and sitting at that angle there is a good possibility that the left hand one would be hanging open. The fuel/oil stains on the water was a good touch though. Sorry if this comes across as picky, but a good diorama has to be immersive without quickly starting to draw puzzling questions.
I didn’t want to also make these observations because the work was otherwise very good. The plane would obviously have been damaged more completely by coming through the trees and rocks at speed. A good effect can be made by thinning the plastic interior of the wings and fuselage so when you create damage the thickness of the “metal “ will appear real. PS, I wouldn’t give 2 cents for that pilots continued chances. 😢
Magnifique diorama 👏👏👏
Oustanding job, the work on the base is just perfect...Inspired and perfect!😍😍👍👍
Gratulation you are an artist 👍
Wow great work mate
Excellent work
Impressive! Beautiful diorama. Inspiring work. Thank you for sharing it. I subscribed.
This is real art! Bravo!👏👏👏👏👏👏
Brilliant
great work ! one of the more realistic wreck ive ever seen ! nicely well done mate , a real treat for the eyes !
Thank you, college! Appreciate it! 🤝
Alex, very cool and impressive work! Keep up the good work ;)
Thank you Paul! 🤝
Das Diorama ist derartig lebendig gestaltet,das ist absolut beeindruckend. Auch die Idee der Szene ist genial,die beschädigte notgelandete Maschine wirkt richtig echt.
Eine kleine Kritik hab ich,nicht böse sein. Dieser Pilot wurde nicht abgeschossen und die Bf109G6 die er flog hatte eine Galland-Haube.
Frohe Ostern und wirklich eine tolle Arbeit.
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback! Ja, du hast absolut recht! Und möge mir Franz Dörr verzeihen! Lassen Sie es mich kurz erklären: Der Revell-Bausatz war nicht sehr gut, und ich habe mich entschieden, ihn mit allen verfügbaren Aufklebern zu verwenden ... ja, das war's. (und mit einer Hüttenlaterne - das wusste ich einfach nicht 🤷🏻♂️) Ja, das ist historisch gesehen ungenau - danke für die Korrektur!) 🤝
See a lot of these, and at first glance, they are spectacular, but as an aircraft nut, the more I look, the more I find w̶r̶o̶n̶g̶ in error.
These errors usually involve the aircraft itself. First off, it's location. How did it get to where it is, which way was it coming, where is the impact point, distance travelled from impact point and the resultant damage (or lack thereof) from the deceleration. Then there is the overall damage. The bullet holes just look like a hot wire pushed into the plastic, not cannon shells shattering and ripping up aluminium. What caused the wing to break the way it did (rock, tree, etc) and why did it break at that point? An impact hard enough to cause that much deflection in a wing would have almost sheared it off at the root. Nine times out of ten, when an aircraft like that came to rest, the elevators would be hanging down. A side note for the 109 series is that most had leading edge slats, and sitting at that angle there is a good possibility that the left hand one would be hanging open. The fuel/oil stains on the water was a good touch though.
Sorry if this comes across as picky, but a good diorama has to be immersive without quickly starting to draw puzzling questions.
thank you for such a detailed review! I'm really appreciate it! I'll try to do it more thoughtfully next time and avoid any inaccuracies!) 🤝
I didn’t want to also make these observations because the work was otherwise very good. The plane would obviously have been damaged more completely by coming through the trees and rocks at speed. A good effect can be made by thinning the plastic interior of the wings and fuselage so when you create damage the thickness of the “metal “ will appear real. PS, I wouldn’t give 2 cents for that pilots continued chances. 😢
Don’t feed the “Bears”. 🤣