Parlay a dozen 3 times is a good way to take a chance but that 4rth step is just a shot in the dark. Winning 3 bets in a row with 12 numbers is hard enough but to win a single number after that 3 wins is next to impossible. Better take the profit from step 1, 2 and 3 and start over or cash out
You were one spot off from your #21 jackpot on your last spin (hit #2, one slot away on the single-zero wheel). So close! I like the same high-potential systems instead of hedge systems that only return a portion of your total bet. The house always takes those types of systems over time. Thanks for an additional review of CEG's higly promoted Ride or Die system.
If it takes .25c or .50c bets you could do 2 different dozens (or columns) & treat each wager as a separate bet progressing & regressing them individually by one unit each based off losses or wins, your choice. That system has kept me in action the longest on a low-budget, but if you don't care about longevity I'd go for some straight up action as many times as you can with that $20 and walk if you hit!
I played this a few weeks ago, but i took $5 from the first win and bet $10 on the second dozen, then when that won I bet $30 on the third dozen. when that hit i started over again. Turned $40 into $250 in about an hour. Gonna try this again soon.
I saw this when they did it and thought why not skip the last single number bet and just start over on the dozens? Also why not just bet 40 on the last Dozen so if you lose you still break even
I probably would not want to place 35 on a single number. Great payoff, but odds are too slim. If I win the 3rd dozen, then maybe pocket 75 which returns 15 bullets to me. Then bet $60 on a six-line for a $300 payout. Just a thought, not that I have tried either method. 😉
I would probably take 5 from the 2nd win so that you are playing with casino money after 2nd win and not relying on getting 3 in a row. So 5 into 15, then 15 into 45, then 40 into 120, take $100 and put $20 on 1 number,$10 on 2 numbers, or $20 on a split. Help, even $5 on 4 numbers/$10 on 2 splits... I don't need to go for the huge win, just looking for decent profit...
I hit the 4th 'bingo' before, started with the 1:1 bets but by the 4th one in the sequence I had $30 on a single number straight up and walked away with my biggest casino profit ever over $1K!
@@teddor1974 so for example instead of betting $35 on one number at 2.7% chance, you bet $25 on one number and $5 on each neighbor or $15 on a number and $10 per neighbor. you still get a decent hit but improve your odds to 8.1%
It all depends on whether you want to go for the jugular or not. It depends on how risk averse or risk seeking you are. Make the bet according to your preferences.
I love ride and die system but to be honest I change the last step. Instead of betting 35 straight up on a number I bet 5 dollars on 1 number and try that for up to 35 dollars so 7 chances to hit straight up. If missed I start over from step one
Most people will never realize the jackpot, hence this is a F- in my book. Like other have said, at least take $5 from the first win to cover your cost, and then maybe take 5 again from the 3rd win, giving you $75 if you hit the third. Again as others have said, take that $75 and at least give yourself a chance and cover a street, corner, or line. I know Jack doesn't like high coverage bets, but I'd go head to head with anyone using this method, with a strategy that starts with higher coverage, higher bet amount, higher loss amount, but higher recovery possibilities.
I'm not sure you need to move the numbers around. However I defiantly have the gamblers bias that the others number would hit. Anyway, The 4th step seems like a waste. I like Tony comment about using profit on the other dozen, ad Dave's comment about starting over or walking away. Step 3 you walk away with over 100, sounds good.
I practiced "Ride or Die" several times at home before I played it at the casino. I was happy with the results, having won 4 sessions in a row, 3 of them over $200. At the casino, however, I lost $250, but did play for almost 4 hours. Never hit the 3rd dozen bet once. I think that it was just a session of very bad rolls, and I'll prolly try it again sometime.
I had this too. This method is an absolute grind. I've practised and nearly lost my bankroll entirely but then managed to get 200 up. I think when you're 200 up, end the session. It is an absolute grind though this method. Seems to work but the losing streaks are often.
Jack Ace you are very good with numbers…with straight betting inside numbers is there a correct amount of numbers to bet before you start diminishing your returns? I mean is it 12, or 24 or 30 numbers … can you show it with one of your equations?
I have a whole video on why you shouldn’t bet on more than 35 numbers at a time. ua-cam.com/video/q6QurhEumCY/v-deo.html You can bet up to 35 numbers before bets start to cancel themselves out. Up to that number, it’s all about how much return you are willing to give up in order to cover more numbers.
@@JackAceDotCom actually I would argue that your best bet mathematically is to bet on only 1 single number. As soon as you start betting on more than 1 number you are guaranteed to have made a losing bet (ball can't land on 2 numbers). When you only bet on 1 number you potentially made no losing bet. It's not a very fun or exciting way to play roulette but that is where your best odds are mathematically anyways.
@@derekmelby7644 If you make an even money bet, it's statistically the same as betting on 18 numbers, but you don't "lose" 17/18 bets that you're making when you hit. You're winning 1/1 when you hit. Making an even money bet is a valid way of playing and isn't necessarily better or worse than betting 1 number straight up. But betting 36 or more numbers is objectively bad because you can usually reconstruct the bet in a way where you lose less or win more without affecting other payouts.
@@JackAceDotCom i agree with you completely on the betting 36+. however betting on an even money bet- and say the ball hits an even number- is exactly the same as losing 17/18 bets- and if it hits an odd number it's the same as losing 18/18 bets Math: say you bet $1 on even - take that 1 dollar and spread it between all even number is 1/18=$0.0555- now say it hits the number 2 so take your value on the 2 spot and multiply by 36 = and you get $2 (1/18)X36=2
@@DrSchor Personally, I wouldn't play Double Zero, either - but they seem to be the baseline in the US. Triple Zero is new and can be avoided. And you don't want Single Zero? They have to exist for the game to exist. WIthout any zeroes, casinos couldn't offer the game because there'd be no house advantage.
So once you hit on step 3 and you’re up 135 why not keep the hundred but then instead of betting 35 on one number just do 7 numbers 5 bucks a pop so you would hit another 160 if one of those 7 numbers hits?
What's the name of this and or other websites I can play roulette on so I can try out strategies as well? Also, are there casinos in America that have a One Zero roulette table???
Yes playing the winning dozen seems to be the better way than moving to another dozen. Can play 2 line bets in two different dozen also after the same dozen hit more than 3 times.
Parlay a dozen 3 times is a good way to take a chance but that 4rth step is just a shot in the dark. Winning 3 bets in a row with 12 numbers is hard enough but to win a single number after that 3 wins is next to impossible. Better take the profit from step 1, 2 and 3 and start over or cash out
Thats whats power packed gambling is… hope to win big
Its called ride-or-die for a reason lol
@@bangbang2070 why is that funny i did not get the joke please explain
You were one spot off from your #21 jackpot on your last spin (hit #2, one slot away on the single-zero wheel). So close! I like the same high-potential systems instead of hedge systems that only return a portion of your total bet. The house always takes those types of systems over time. Thanks for an additional review of CEG's higly promoted Ride or Die system.
Never play triple zero Roulette no matter what!
why not
What's Your BEST System For A $20 Budget For A Bubble Roulette Machine?
If it takes .25c or .50c bets you could do 2 different dozens (or columns) & treat each wager as a separate bet progressing & regressing them individually by one unit each based off losses or wins, your choice. That system has kept me in action the longest on a low-budget, but if you don't care about longevity I'd go for some straight up action as many times as you can with that $20 and walk if you hit!
i would give this system a plum c
Doesn't look to good to me are you playing real money
I dont get the appeal
I played this a few weeks ago, but i took $5 from the first win and bet $10 on the second dozen, then when that won I bet $30 on the third dozen. when that hit i started over again. Turned $40 into $250 in about an hour. Gonna try this again soon.
I saw this when they did it and thought why not skip the last single number bet and just start over on the dozens? Also why not just bet 40 on the last Dozen so if you lose you still break even
Exactly, rake a little profit on each step is a good way to come out ahead or give yourself more chances overall.
I probably would not want to place 35 on a single number. Great payoff, but odds are too slim.
If I win the 3rd dozen, then maybe pocket 75 which returns 15 bullets to me. Then bet $60 on a six-line for a $300 payout. Just a thought, not that I have tried either method. 😉
very bad system
you cant say that unless you can name a system that is very good
I would probably take 5 from the 2nd win so that you are playing with casino money after 2nd win and not relying on getting 3 in a row.
So 5 into 15, then 15 into 45, then 40 into 120, take $100 and put $20 on 1 number,$10 on 2 numbers, or $20 on a split. Help, even $5 on 4 numbers/$10 on 2 splits... I don't need to go for the huge win, just looking for decent profit...
Would love to see you run this strategy through the new simulator
Yes please run it through the simulator
thank you for your patience despite the inherent randomness of roulette. You restore our dignity regarding systems play!
I hit the 4th 'bingo' before, started with the 1:1 bets but by the 4th one in the sequence I had $30 on a single number straight up and walked away with my biggest casino profit ever over $1K!
I would change the 4th bet to a better odds bet, maybe a double street or 4 splits...
Just to have a chance to gain profit.
yes. 25 straight up and 5 per neighbor or 15/10/10
Agree. That's exactly how I'd do it.
@@kamnovak5268 Explain please what u mean :)
@@teddor1974 so for example instead of betting $35 on one number at 2.7% chance, you bet $25 on one number and $5 on each neighbor or $15 on a number and $10 per neighbor. you still get a decent hit but improve your odds to 8.1%
This system should be called... "waste my time system"
Oh man... well if he can make $5.00 into multiples more......why bother with creating a video about it?
the whole point of going to a casino is to kill time, certainly it is not to win
I get the "Die" part. With this method, you will die trying to make a profit.
i dare you . name just one method in which you do not die. i dare you
I don't have the patience for such a small payout.
Correct, correct, correct
play double streets and bet 100 or 200 each 😂
that tier 4 bet of $35 straight up on one bet can spread out $5 each on 7 numbers instead. is a good system anyway. thanks.
It all depends on whether you want to go for the jugular or not. It depends on how risk averse or risk seeking you are. Make the bet according to your preferences.
I love ride and die system but to be honest I change the last step. Instead of betting 35 straight up on a number I bet 5 dollars on 1 number and try that for up to 35 dollars so 7 chances to hit straight up. If missed I start over from step one
Most people will never realize the jackpot, hence this is a F- in my book. Like other have said, at least take $5 from the first win to cover your cost, and then maybe take 5 again from the 3rd win, giving you $75 if you hit the third. Again as others have said, take that $75 and at least give yourself a chance and cover a street, corner, or line. I know Jack doesn't like high coverage bets, but I'd go head to head with anyone using this method, with a strategy that starts with higher coverage, higher bet amount, higher loss amount, but higher recovery possibilities.
Good video, thank you!
I call it the slow descent into madness. 😋 It's not a bad strategy, but it's seldom you will get all the way to tier 4 successfully.
If you got all day listening to audio books, free drinks, taking breaks and no wife and children, and no life . I could see it might work.
I'm not sure you need to move the numbers around. However I defiantly have the gamblers bias that the others number would hit. Anyway, The 4th step seems like a waste. I like Tony comment about using profit on the other dozen, ad Dave's comment about starting over or walking away. Step 3 you walk away with over 100, sounds good.
This system sucks.
Dont like it, hitting 3 dozens in a row is hard enough
I practiced "Ride or Die" several times at home before I played it at the casino. I was happy with the results, having won 4 sessions in a row, 3 of them over $200. At the casino, however, I lost $250, but did play for almost 4 hours. Never hit the 3rd dozen bet once. I think that it was just a session of very bad rolls, and I'll prolly try it again sometime.
I had this too. This method is an absolute grind. I've practised and nearly lost my bankroll entirely but then managed to get 200 up. I think when you're 200 up, end the session. It is an absolute grind though this method. Seems to work but the losing streaks are often.
Jack Ace you are very good with numbers…with straight betting inside numbers is there a correct amount of numbers to bet before you start diminishing your returns? I mean is it 12, or 24 or 30 numbers … can you show it with one of your equations?
I have a whole video on why you shouldn’t bet on more than 35 numbers at a time.
ua-cam.com/video/q6QurhEumCY/v-deo.html
You can bet up to 35 numbers before bets start to cancel themselves out. Up to that number, it’s all about how much return you are willing to give up in order to cover more numbers.
Thank you! Great vids!
@@JackAceDotCom actually I would argue that your best bet mathematically is to bet on only 1 single number. As soon as you start betting on more than 1 number you are guaranteed to have made a losing bet (ball can't land on 2 numbers). When you only bet on 1 number you potentially made no losing bet. It's not a very fun or exciting way to play roulette but that is where your best odds are mathematically anyways.
@@derekmelby7644 If you make an even money bet, it's statistically the same as betting on 18 numbers, but you don't "lose" 17/18 bets that you're making when you hit. You're winning 1/1 when you hit.
Making an even money bet is a valid way of playing and isn't necessarily better or worse than betting 1 number straight up.
But betting 36 or more numbers is objectively bad because you can usually reconstruct the bet in a way where you lose less or win more without affecting other payouts.
@@JackAceDotCom i agree with you completely on the betting 36+. however betting on an even money bet- and say the ball hits an even number- is exactly the same as losing 17/18 bets- and if it hits an odd number it's the same as losing 18/18 bets Math: say you bet $1 on even - take that 1 dollar and spread it between all even number is 1/18=$0.0555- now say it hits the number 2 so take your value on the 2 spot and multiply by 36 = and you get $2 (1/18)X36=2
Nice strategy to burn money
Does anyone spread the 4th tier of 7 units across 7 numbers? Is there an advantage by doing so?
You have a bigger coverage but a smaller win.
yes, it has been done, but no advantage
What simulator is he using?
Do you ever test baccarat or crap systems
Play it using FTW
I don’t like it.
Wasting money
8 and 17 are my golden numbers. I play insides only. Would get over $2,800 payout in just those 2 spins.
What if you play the 0's on a triple 0 wheel ?eventually you hit a 0 . ?
I would suggest that you not bet ANY money on ANY number on a Triple Zero Wheel.
@@JackAceDotCom Exactly, the triple 0's wouldn't be around if people would stop playing them!
@@JackAceDotCom what is the problem
@@seasonsintheson then why are double zeros around? or even a single zero
@@DrSchor Personally, I wouldn't play Double Zero, either - but they seem to be the baseline in the US. Triple Zero is new and can be avoided.
And you don't want Single Zero? They have to exist for the game to exist. WIthout any zeroes, casinos couldn't offer the game because there'd be no house advantage.
So once you hit on step 3 and you’re up 135 why not keep the hundred but then instead of betting 35 on one number just do 7 numbers 5 bucks a pop so you would hit another 160 if one of those 7 numbers hits?
because that would not be the ride or die system, of course
Nope 💩
What's the name of this and or other websites I can play roulette on so I can try out strategies as well? Also, are there casinos in America that have a One Zero roulette table???
This strategy is called “ride or die”
Ceasars in Vegas has single zero.
I will play the winning dozen
chase the winning would be interesting
Yes playing the winning dozen seems to be the better way than moving to another dozen. Can play 2 line bets in two different dozen also after the same dozen hit more than 3 times.