I had two buddies who swore up and down they had the same beautiful type of system to convince ME. I could figure out why they got so dumb in math or how after being so smart with me in school and in teaching for years before. I knew it had to be a clickbait title and so I guess it worked but some people really believe because they hate losing to the system that already figured it out.
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
So I experimented on a rolet demo with 10k and used each bet to be 1000x less than what’s in the account, so $10 bets. I built it up to 25k and then started using $25 bets. Hit 50k and used $50 bets. Hit 100k and used $100 bets. I then started hoping I was going to lose so I could double it and get a better return. I got it to around 130k and then lost it all. I did 168 spins in total and around 157 of them that kept me above water
For sure, less annoying pointless conversations about food and adult diapers and more discussion of “Okay, so here’s how you play the strategy and why it works.”
@@steeloned not true. I was there last month. Played roulette in my standard casinos. In fact Planet Hollywood added 000 Roulette table now. Roulette has the best House edge, why will they remove it?
This betting system involves placing bets on either the dozens (groups of 12 numbers) or columns (groups of numbers on the roulette table layout) and switching to the other dozen or column after each win. The idea is that eventually, you will win, and when you do, you will switch to the other dozen or column and continue betting. This can be done with either small 1/1 bets or larger bets on the dozens. According to the person who described the system, it has a failure rate of around 2% and an average return of 46% in 7 spins. It is important to set limits for yourself and walk away when you reach a certain level of winnings or losses to ensure that you don't end up losing more money than you can afford to.
Wouldn't betting Red and black at the same time running each as its own betting scale be better than the 2 12 sectors and wouldn't only betting one black or red letting you scale your betting higher towards the table max
i’ve been daytrading for years, just recently however i’ve gone to the casino with a few friends and found it interesting how the theory for “beating the casino” has such similar components to that of the theory behind “beating the markets” in terms of the flow of logic used to analyze changing events in the moment. Great high level content guys keep it up, y’all know how to make a entertaining video no doubt
Yeah markets have memory. This is like YOLOing on OTM options but closing the new position after 2 minutes. This is not a winning strategy... as roulette cannot "be beaten" by strategy. It's pure luck.
The problem with systems like this is that there is a 'lose all' threshold. In this case, 6 bullets. When you lose, you lose more than all your winnings you have accumulated....They say they only lost 1 time over 1000 spins but what they don't say is what they had left (if anything) after 1000 spins.
This is why you don't gamble with the expectation to win and use money that you are prepared to lose. Everyone's risk tolerance will differ from the next, and it's up to the person on the systems they prefer.
@@natural9743 that system has been known to be irrational for centuries. it is a strat based upon "incredulity". Meaning it is incredible that one might lose say, 8 spins in a row, so the naive believe it is impossible, or that it is , of necessity, not going to happen until you play a long time. Both of these are nonsense. But hey, quit your job, hit the road. You will , relatively quickly, realize that you wont make money at it. Fact is, NO strat can diminish the house edge on these games, and that is what you will lose and no, it is not because the pit boss will back you off because of what you are doing. If s/he does, s/he is as irrational as people who play this game, and as the jokers who made this vid
I enjoy learning new systems... but loosing after just 5 spins that are within 26 of 38 numbers consecutively; seems extremely likely to happen almost every single session.
i am about to test this strat on virtual table. i feel like as long as you got the capital you can lose but eventually will just win it all back because you keep betting what you lose, eh?
@@jakesgotgameyou will always lose no matter how long u play for. You are getting lower value bets than the real probability of your win. I understand the excitement of gambling, that’s why I’m a gambler myself. But please dont fool yourself. Overtime, mathematically you will always lose on roulette because you are offered a lower price with your bet than the likelyhood of it resulting in a win.
I’ve been mentioning it to them for years. They just don’t listen. Or don’t care it would make it such a better channel if that was on the screen continual up or down.
My girlfriend made her first bet in the casino on 27 for $10, it's her birthday. It hit, she collected $350 and never made another bet. She's the only person to ever beat the casino in human history
He who lives by Marty will die by Marty. I lost five in a row (450 each) then won the next bet and then lost five in a row again! So much for 99.999% fellas....
Check out " Low Roller Heaven" strategy on you tube. Progression starts with various type bets and ends with betting 1 number the last 18 spins. Quite interesting.
True I seen a dozen not come out for 38 times and you couldn't do 20 times because there is limits on table so your max goes would probably be 5 at most it's shite system
I love the often repeated: "if they catch you doing a Martingale, they will back you off". If a pit boss ever did that, he is incredibly irrational, and should be fired immediately. I have played a lot of poker, and have counted cards for 25 years at BJ, and have never met a pit boss who is that stupid.
I just downloaded a roulette game on my phone and I lost all of the coins with this strategy in a matter of minutes. Think twice if you want to bet real money this way.
Martingale works,until it does not. The assumption is, whatever you are chasing" has to happen" after 8-9-10 consecutive loses. Until that S.O.B. occasion comes along,and, let's say, you get 13 odd numbers, and then a zero for good measure, in a row, or 16 red numbers in a row.
I like what you guys do, but I wish you would only play the strategy you are testing. It can be confusing when you both are running different strategies simultaneously.
What would also be nice is if dude on the right would stop babbling. Also, a little more explanation would be good. Maybe I could keep up if whitey shut his pie hole.
What they're doing is playing the strategy while the other guy is betting what isn't part of the strategy. Then comparing ... in this case both won. Yet the strategy was much higher saying that it's a good one to bet. Also you don't have to bet every spin.
@@brockrohn360 A single chip. Since chips can be multiple values, “unit” is used to say one chip of whatever value your betting. Instead of saying “I bet 30 on two dozens and 20 on two corners in the remaining dozen”, you can just say “3 units on two dozens of your choice, 2 units on two separate corners in the remaining dozen”. Hope that makes sense.
Here is a strategy I am testing. Start $2500. Bet $100 on 0 & 00. wait for 2 consecutive colors(red or back) to come up and then bet $200 on the opposite with Martingale while maintaining the $100 bet on 0 & 00. Betting on color won't make you money but it will allow you to play 0 & 00 for free until it hits. It requires patience and many spins
@@BJTemujinEven without limits, Elon Musk couldn’t hold out long enough if the wheel hated him. At some point, you would have to bet more money than exists in the entire world, just to win your original bet(s) back.
An experienced croupier told us in Beau Rivage he can put the ball in certain sections of the wheel. That's what we play, certain sections and WE WIN (most of the time) and take the casino's money home!!
I call BS on that guy. It may seem to him that he can do that, but in a legit wheel, with a solid wheel spin and average or above ball release velocity, it’s 100.000% pure random.
You should increase your bet after a win, not a loss. Then you are playing with house money, not your own. Win five in a row and then start over. It's not guaranteed but it's better than Martingale.
@@TheodoreChristen thats a terrible iidea?! hahaha, you win right up until you lose the last bet and because youve been doubling up, you also lose everything you had originally won in that win streak! lol
with the martigale, the key is simply to just have a massive bankroll to back you. Ive lost 23 times in a row, and the world record streak happened back in the wild west days and the streak is 36. I dont know enough to be able to say that all 36 were eeither all black or all red, Im just going to assume that there must have been some green in there, or maybe they were switching back and forth each game, meaning that each game was going back and forth in opposition to the losing bets betwqeen red and black, or odds and evens, etc
@@ivasoomluap😂😂😂 yeah it would be nice if roulette numbers always came up when the odds say they should. I saw Five 9’s in a row one time. I’ve seen 20+ blacks in a row before.
Nice System, started whit $72 and ended whit $445, not bad starting whit a small balance, but one thing if I assure you is that your heart will be beating so hard of adrenaline :)
@@ammygaming2817on a win, the bet remains at $25. If a loss then Martingale ( 25, 50, 150, 450, 1350 ) . Once you win with increased bet you reset to $25 again. Each dozen or column betted is treated separately. Not a good system. Notice how seldom 1st dozen came up. I've seen 11 dozens come up in succession recently. Ultimately you can't beat the bank.
Placing your bets across the board including coloums with only 2 donks.. the 3 and 0 increase bet on loss 3700% (x37) with enough bank roll for a 4th bullet!!
Yo, been testing this on a single 0 at mgm on low bets. Starting bank 4, ending at over 8 over 35 rolls. 100% increase. Going to try the higher bets next. It's a pretty good system!
@@aymenamamou4030 slightly modded to this system, both dozens are played as a single bet instead, triple MG both bets on loss (keep the bets on the same dozens, or alternate on loss, your choice), if it hits, keep the bet the same and switch one of the dozens, but always playing middle. Return to initial bet after hitting on an MG spin. Walk at 3 consecutive losses or two 0s in a row, or when you've reached your ideal profit. This method is slow, very slow (1 unit gain on every hit), so if you're playing low bets online it can take a while. Big bets, it starts to get scary when you're at the 3rd/4th triple. A 10 initial bet becomes 90 by the third loss (130 total), and the 4th is a 270 bet (400 total loss if you lose on the 4th.) Big bets on this system need a HUGE bankroll to be able to float at least 4 - 5 losses. This is not 100% and 5 bad spins in a row can break you if you're not careful, so be mindful of when your luck is starting to turn, and dont be afraid to walk or reduce bets if you're not seeing the results you like.
Sorry…there is no such thing as luck involved in these games. They have percentages that are built in….it’s math. Yes you can win at certain points but the more you play you HAVE to lose. Also, any system that doubles up or adds on losses will eventually reach the house limit and you’re done. You guys know this, right?
I haven’t been in a Mexican restaurant that gives complimentary nachos. They all bring complimentary chips and salsa in the Mexican restaurants I eat at (in Texas). Nachos is a dish consisting of chips covered with refried beans, meat, cheese, jalapeños plus or minus some ingredient’s.
I tried a system of betting red/black/red/black/red etc. the online casino immediately went on a run of giving me 28 losses in a row. Odds of over 2 million to one against.
So you will be able to answer my questions: Why go from 25-50-150-450-1350-4050 ??? Why not simply try to regain your losses: 25-25-50-100-200-400-800-1600 ????
Thank you for this video!! It looks like a good system!!! You both are FUN to watch!!! I agree, it looks like a grapefruit, if you have a good bankroll!!! 👏🏻
This is going to sound like a silly question - but I'm confused by the numbers you gave for the increased bet sizes if martingale is typically double the last bet shouldn't the numbers be 25, 50, 100, 200, 400? The numbers you mentioned were 25, 50, 150, 450, and 1350 Sorry to be annoying I just really want to understand
I was thinking the same thing. Must be that new math I have heard so much about????? How about an explanation on why it's not doubled on a loss like the system rule says.
Love watching these play the single 0 version I’m learning but I’m a couple thousand up in the first 3 weeks I play live online I usually wait till it’s a 3 run and then go opposites covering multiple upto 3 at once there’s deffo money to be made I’m just fine tuning my system will soon be living my best life
Ok,I saw your strategy. Now here is mine and it's a money maker. First,we all know there 38 numbers. 2 Green 18 black,18 red. Now when you go to play roulette just watch the colors that are coming out the most. For example,if red is the dominant color. Then put money on all of the red numbers and also money on green. In that red color,there will be number that are repeating. So put extra money on those. I put $3 on green and I put $2 on all 18 numbers. I will put $4 on the numbers that repeat in that red color. You will do the same will black if you feel black . Remember to always back green with whatever color you choose to bet. I make good money doing this. You can't bet every hand you have to be very patient and discipline. The money will come to you trust me.
Statistics say that 5 percent of players constantly win at casinos. This number is pretty stable and has not changed in years. Nobody knows exactly how they do it, because mathematically it is impossible due to the house edge. Casinos know these people and apparently tolerate them, probably thinking that they are best free publicity for gambling.
Albert Einstein supposedly once said: “No one can win at roulette unless he steals money from the table while the croupier isn't looking. I'm sure he meant in the long run but in the short run we can be all be rich 😎
Now you likely can't. There is a reason they change croupiers often. A tired spinner with muscle memory, odds can tip in your favour by increased chance of landing in an area of the wheel.
@leonvdm any proof that somebody performing the same action a thousand times a day for years who is required to monitor a dozen people, making dozens of bets each spin likely gets into a subconscious routine?
@@BJTemujinany proof that the wheel specifically designed to give as random an output as possible, after hundreds of years of refinement, can be defeated by a tired guy?
@markkealy4417 reality? Every camera and procedure a casino has to limit having a biased wheel? Unless the wheel, spun by the hands of a human or the ball, spun by the hands of a human, are intercepted by random or predetermined interference to the spin of the wheel, then the croupier is a large part of where the ball lands. It isn't about a croupier having the skill, or muscle memory to land in a specific number. It is about the ability to land in a quadrant 26%+ of the time, or landing within 18 numbers 55%+ of the time. Either gives you a better edge than card counting blackjack and it just needs bare minimum getting within 34 spots more than expected.
I’ve found an altered martingale that you double plus a bet each level. So it’s 1,3,7,15,31,63,127. That way you win a bet each roll rather than each time you win
At what point do you stop the Martingale on each of the bets? Do you go back to the $50 bet after a win? Does that start the 15 rolls over? or do you just play out 15 rolls? There is a lot of talking going on. it would be awesome on each of these systems if you all would make a summary card at the end with the system name.
Hi I can help! I was the submitter; In this case Alex is doing the 25 dollar minimum bet version. The bets are 25/50/150/450/1350/4050 Each time you lose on a dozen you put out the next bet in the chain. Once the bet is hit you go back to base bet of 25 and move it to the dozen you weren’t on. This is a change to what you see in the video because Alex misunderstood me when I explained it to him. Hope it helps! If you reply I will check this every so often.
I like this system. However, on rare occasion one of the dozen will hit 7 times in row. That's when i don't like about it. In addition, there's the zeroes. This system is best used in craps. No zeroes. However, it is a grind and have to do it with a partner. I did a modified martingale.
Casinos love players that use this strategy. The player only ever wins a very small amount of money equal to the starting bet of the run but when they lose, they lose everything. The stratergy only works if you start with infinite money.
How to recognize when skill or strategy or method makes absolutely no difference: can you lose on purpose? No? Than it's gambling and there's no strategy. Stop listening to these scammers.
Going to have to watch this carefully a few times. I blew my bankroll working a progression on a single dozen. What are the odds it misses 13 spins in a row?
The odds are pretty low. But, as s with everything roulette, low odds doesn't mean it's not going to happen. I've seen it miss a certain dozen 15 times in a row 3 times in a 100 spins
I did this with black / red. I made a lot of money. You First have to wait for the same color to hit 4x in a row, then start betting the opposite color. Start at $10. 2.5 your bet each time. You get 8 bets before you hit the table limit. You will win eventually and make money.
If this actually worked, you would have (and would currently be) continuously be making more and more money, and eventually reaching higher and higher limit roulette. There are tables out there with $25K minimum and $500K maximum. Why are you playing $10 roulette tables if you "win eventually and make [a lot of] money"? In the end, there is no system that does not result in catastrophic losses. Casinos are a business, not a charity. Roulette has never been beaten. If there was, you'd be the richest person in the world.
Kind of reminds me of the “hands of Midas.” Treating each bet as a separate bet to martingale. Although this one has bigger upside on high martingale hits. This system is an ulcer waiting to happen though. 😂
i love the system it may even be a grapefruit. but i would most definatly would start lower at a 5 or 10$ limit which i can find because i live in Ky and all of the casinos around us are smaller ones and we have to drive 2 hrs to any of those small casinos so i need to win just to cover the cost of going. we are usually comped a room but that isnt much if we paid for them so i guess our comps could be used better. idk I would like you all to do a Baccarat system that you think Mikki Mase uses if you think you know what he done to win all of the money he did
I don't get these numbers at all! You put 450 on 2nd dozen, you won and you get 2650? WTF? Dozen pays back the bet's 3x so it should be 450x3 that is 1350, minus the the 450 bet so the profit is 900. Please dont fool people!
Albert Einstein was once reported to have said the only way you can win at roulette is to steal the chips from the table. There is no way to beat the odds in roulette. Every spin of the wheel is like it's never been spun before. Unlike, say, Black Jack where the cards are removed from the deck once dealt which affects the subsequent odds, each spin of the wheel is like a new deck of cards thus any previous sequence is irrelevant. Internet scammers con their audience by recording and narrating several sessions using their 'winning strategy' then just post the ones that win by chance.
white guy -durian Asian guy -peach... nacho's are always on the menu chips n salsa are the appetizer like bread n olive oil at an Italian restaurant...
avg amount of spins to hit a 20 loosing streak in a row is 2,564 ( lets say 2,500) avg of 2500 spins at £1 was £7,140 profit (Avg £2.85 profit per spin) if we follow the Fibonacci sequence 1-20 the bank roll is £15,736 a profit of £-8,596 you need a minimum of £6.30 profit per spin. The strategy seems profitable because you only make money and never lose it if you don't go bankrupt but the last spin doesn't effect the next spin and will eventually hit the max bet loosing more than you've earned.
1st time testing this and 3rd 12 didn't hit for 13 spins. 2nd Time 1st 12 didn't hit for 8. That's the risk my friends. Be responsible and good luck to all
I tried the strategy where you switch from one colour to the other and do a double bet, it doesn’t work. I found out it’s actually safer to stick to one colour, you can be real lucky or unlucky since that colour can be the same 30+ times. But most likely you’ll hit the betting limit and lose anyway with any given system.
The roulette wheel isn't random in a computer we have pretty good randomness but it's actually not that good because we rely on entropy and it can get really low. This is when can see it.
Another variation of the martingale strategy. It might work if the tables didn't have limits and you could use an unlimited bank roll and quit when you hit big. Also, they overlooked the greens.
Tried this strategy the other night! Worked until the 8th spin. They hit almost 18 spins in the 1st 12 I stayed with the strategy and had 3 cycles of losses hitting my stop lost. I hit that 0.01% 3 times in a row. It was unreal 😢playing the 2nd 12 and 3rd 12 last night. I went to another table same result playing starting with 15 and doubling it With every loss 🤦🏾♂️
I feel your pain. I have had this done to me multiple times. It's so common for the wheel to hit same dozen more then 6 or 7 times. V I've gotten wacked many times. One time it hitting 19 times in first column and I was on second and third. Lost 10k my worst loss ever. I took a break after that cuz my mental health was at its lowest.
As weird as this sounds... but seems to be a Universe thing. Go with Momentum. The thought process of. Oh, it hit black 10 times, it has to go red. It doesn't have to do anything, but if you see a rhythm happening. Try and go with that. There's no science behind this, its not tangible, but can definitely be felt. You see it happen at tables all the time. When someone gets "hot". or to the contrary. When someone runs cold. Just not in the right timing. Need to able to either switch to the 1st 12 in this case, or walk away... wishing you great luck on your next try...
@@jorgeperezochoa8504 I've seen 32 hits in a row on a column or dozen before
8 днів тому
10:15 he mis-spoke when mentioning 'nachos'. He really meant "chips". ALL restaurants charge for NACHOS since those are an entree dish. But most serve chips as a free courtesy.
Love these videos But thissystem is the ultimate durian system. It could be Worse, but the one martingale is bad enough. Two different where you need the table to switch gently around to not Get one of the bets too high. Just straight up big nope. Would love positive Martingale, but with one bet I’m imagining running 2 positive martingales on 1:1 to bet And 2 dozen/column positive fibonnacci. Would be pretty fun
Agree. The only sure winners are the casinos. Do people really think the casino would run a game if there was only way for the odds to be in favour of the customer?
The logic is that the bets of $25 are the ones that actually turn a profit, while the tripling bets of $50, $150, $450, $1350, and so forth are for loss recovery. Let's start with the 2 bets of $25, each placed on a different dozen. There are two possible outcomes: 1. One of the $25 bets wins, earning $50 on a 2 to 1 payout. However, because both bets cannot win at the same time, the other $25 bet necessarily loses, so the player walks away with $25 in profit. 2. Neither of the bets win. In that case, the player is down $50 from both $25 bets losing. Okay, so let's assume we lost the first round and we're down $50. How do we zero that out? By increasing the bets themselves to $50. If we win, we'll earn $100. $50 of that will cover the other bet we just made that didn't win, and the other $50 will cover the 2 losing $25 bets. We're free to make $25 bets again and try to make some money. ...But what if we lose? Can we just double the bets from $50 to $100? No. If a $100 bet wins, it'll earn $200- but it won't fully offset the $250 we're down: $100 from the failed bet this round, the two failed $50 bets from the round before that, and the two original failed $25 bets. To get to the point where we break even on our losses, we need to triple our bets from $50, not double them. $150 earns $300, which covers the failed $150 bet, the two failed $50 bets, and the two failed $25 bets. Any following round of this is an extension of the same logic. All this being said: please do not try this in real life. If you have to try it, do it with _very_ small denominations as your base- $1 or $2. The exponential nature of loss means you can quickly bite off more than you can chew.
It is so hard to follow what you guys are doing and how the system is working when you are attempting to be funny talking about other stuff. The strategies are interesting its so hard to follow along and try to concentrate on it.
@@RickNorthwest I think they need to talk in units instead of dollars it is impossible to keep it straight when they arent even really talking about it after the first minute
You absolutely can beat the system. You have to not get greedy and know when to walk away.... And YES, the casino will still win, by taking from those who don't know how to play. My girlfriend and I used to do $200 per day, 5 days a week using an advanced Martingale system. We won way more than we ever lost, in fact it got boring in the end, and we stopped going. Some days they would take us off the table and offer us a free steak dinner in the restaurant, cos it was cheaper for them if we were not at the table.
Mathematically, to get a 99.999% win chance, you would need to have £6,553,575 if you was playing just 1 of the 3rds, as to get the odds of 33% up to 99.999% you have to run it 18 times. But running 2 side by side is very interesting. As it may actually reduce your risk, as if one runs cold, you still have slight income from the other. As you make more money also, you can afford to run it more times making it less likely to fail on you. I will have to find a way to work out the % chance of failure running 2 side by side and get back to you.
@@Fightingturtle404 Congrats. The math is still right. The odds where still technically against you. Getting lucky is how every success story is made when it comes to gambling. For every 1 person who brags about this working. multiple people are shamefully hiding all their losses.
When I first started playing I made my own insanely stupid strat where u start with 300 and bet 50 on the most common colour if it pays out play it again. If it didn't pay then you put 75 on the other color and then if it pays out go back to 50 on the same color and repeat
After 15 years of working in gaming, I can tell you with 100% certainty that casinos LOVE your strategy. Love players with a strategy or system.
I had two buddies who swore up and down they had the same beautiful type of system to convince ME. I could figure out why they got so dumb in math or how after being so smart with me in school and in teaching for years before. I knew it had to be a clickbait title and so I guess it worked but some people really believe because they hate losing to the system that already figured it out.
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
Not being racist but I had 2 Jewish accountants straight after 12am Sunday morning (after Sabbath I think) with an A4 piece of paper full of maths formulae on my roulette table and they lost every spin. You can't beat the casino. Basic probability theory and game rules will tell you that. We call roulette a fools game in the industry
So I experimented on a rolet demo with 10k and used each bet to be 1000x less than what’s in the account, so $10 bets. I built it up to 25k and then started using $25 bets. Hit 50k and used $50 bets. Hit 100k and used $100 bets. I then started hoping I was going to lose so I could double it and get a better return. I got it to around 130k and then lost it all.
I did 168 spins in total and around 157 of them that kept me above water
wow amazing
I know a better strat just need a bigger bank roll u should try it on the demo
What did you bet on tho?
Try it with 1/10,000 roll
@@jagr1683 In the very long run, you are dead as a door nail. Short run you have a chance.
Love your channel. Thank you. Really would love a running count on the screen of what you’re up/down after every spin.
Yes please I actually love this
For sure, less annoying pointless conversations about food and adult diapers and more discussion of “Okay, so here’s how you play the strategy and why it works.”
@@madimccormick97 Yes, less inane banter and more instruction on what is going on.
Remember guys, if betting systems worked, casinos wouldn’t make any money
Haven't you heard? Half of them in Vegas ripped out their roulette wheels.
@@steeloned not true. I was there last month. Played roulette in my standard casinos. In fact Planet Hollywood added 000 Roulette table now. Roulette has the best House edge, why will they remove it?
@@steeloned lol when did they do that
they are making money from the dumb players
The law of large numbers is on your side. And with a large cash roll you can win. Its really simple actually
This betting system involves placing bets on either the dozens (groups of 12 numbers) or columns (groups of numbers on the roulette table layout) and switching to the other dozen or column after each win. The idea is that eventually, you will win, and when you do, you will switch to the other dozen or column and continue betting. This can be done with either small 1/1 bets or larger bets on the dozens. According to the person who described the system, it has a failure rate of around 2% and an average return of 46% in 7 spins. It is important to set limits for yourself and walk away when you reach a certain level of winnings or losses to ensure that you don't end up losing more money than you can afford to.
Why is switching important? Are the statistics the same if you don’t switch?
@@automationnation Good question. I am inclined to keep the same two dozens and Martingale the loss.
Wouldn't betting Red and black at the same time running each as its own betting scale be better than the 2 12 sectors and wouldn't only betting one black or red letting you scale your betting higher towards the table max
Thanks for explaining how this system works. These 2 Talkey Mouth Guys sometimes are distraction
But the Kooky Jokes are Comical.
I don’t see how that’s possible. Red/Black only pays 1 to 1…Dozens are 2 to 1…please explain.
i’ve been daytrading for years, just recently however i’ve gone to the casino with a few friends and found it interesting how the theory for “beating the casino” has such similar components to that of the theory behind “beating the markets” in terms of the flow of logic used to analyze changing events in the moment. Great high level content guys keep it up, y’all know how to make a entertaining video no doubt
beating the market is a lie. go with the flow and take profits and get out
wtf is a composite operator lol @@dankfrank2656
Yeah markets have memory. This is like YOLOing on OTM options but closing the new position after 2 minutes. This is not a winning strategy... as roulette cannot "be beaten" by strategy. It's pure luck.
@@chainer2322 You beat me to the punch. These commenters are next level degens.
@@Digitalgems9000 not true, paul pelosi did it all the time 😅
Saint Martingale is the patron saint for all casino owners everywhere.
😂
The problem with systems like this is that there is a 'lose all' threshold. In this case, 6 bullets. When you lose, you lose more than all your winnings you have accumulated....They say they only lost 1 time over 1000 spins but what they don't say is what they had left (if anything) after 1000 spins.
A safer way of playing this is to increase both bets by one unit on every loss until profit is shown and then go back to one unit on each dozen
This is why you don't gamble with the expectation to win and use money that you are prepared to lose. Everyone's risk tolerance will differ from the next, and it's up to the person on the systems they prefer.
@@natural9743 that system has been known to be irrational for centuries.
it is a strat based upon "incredulity". Meaning it is incredible that one might lose say, 8 spins in a row, so the naive believe it is impossible, or that it is , of necessity, not going to happen until you play a long time.
Both of these are nonsense.
But hey, quit your job, hit the road. You will , relatively quickly, realize that you wont make money at it. Fact is, NO strat can diminish the house edge on these games, and that is what you will lose
and no, it is not because the pit boss will back you off because of what you are doing. If s/he does, s/he is as irrational as people who play this game, and as the jokers who made this vid
Keeping a running bankroll or profit counter is very helpful!
What is a profit counter?
@@donnalmich8398where u count your profit?☠️
@@donnalmich8398keeping track on the screen of how much they’re in profit
@@donnalmich8398 keeping track of profit on the screen
I enjoy learning new systems... but loosing after just 5 spins that are within 26 of 38 numbers consecutively; seems extremely likely to happen almost every single session.
i am about to test this strat on virtual table. i feel like as long as you got the capital you can lose but eventually will just win it all back because you keep betting what you lose, eh?
@@jakesgotgameyou will always lose no matter how long u play for. You are getting lower value bets than the real probability of your win. I understand the excitement of gambling, that’s why I’m a gambler myself. But please dont fool yourself. Overtime, mathematically you will always lose on roulette because you are offered a lower price with your bet than the likelyhood of it resulting in a win.
@@louistaylor-hall3661what's the best thing in the casino? craps?
You guys should keep a count of your chips on screen love the vids!
I’ve been mentioning it to them for years. They just don’t listen. Or don’t care it would make it such a better channel if that was on the screen continual up or down.
Too much ranting, not enough talking about the strategy.
Ah, yes. Martingale. Works 100% of the time...... until it doesn't.
Martingale works a lot for me personally
As long as you have unlimited money it will never fail
@@Amatsu2077 That's why they have minimum maximum bets
This.
Too true! I played the Martingale strategy to a table maximum, won and never played again.
There's a reason nobody EVER gets backed off from the roulette table!
If they see you winning consistently, they will start cheating you, Mucking your winning chips when you are not looking.
@@banjohombre IM ALWAYS LOOKING MIKE WAZOWSKI
I swear to god every time daddy David was saying nachos I was screaming "ITS CALLED CHIPS A SALSA!!!" 😂 😂 😂
Same, I was dying!
That's what white people say
😂
It just show he doesn’t go to Mexican restaurants often
Oh is that was he was talking about? I was like where the hell are nachos free?? And why does he think that's the norm?
My girlfriend made her first bet in the casino on 27 for $10, it's her birthday. It hit, she collected $350 and never made another bet. She's the only person to ever beat the casino in human history
Good for you buddy
My sister did the same with the slots. Ahead 450 and quit. She says its her money and she ain't giving it back.
He who lives by Marty will die by Marty. I lost five in a row (450 each) then won the next bet and then lost five in a row again! So much for 99.999% fellas....
it’s best to play roulette switching between multiple “strategies” and going off how u feel
🥴
You try it on a simulator first?! 😅
My strategy is choosing one number and pray. I call it the long shot strategy, and works sometimes.
Choose one number and bet big?
@@darrylwilson9718 bet same number every time then leave if lose or win. Come back in week and try again.
Check out " Low Roller Heaven" strategy on you tube. Progression starts with various type bets and ends with betting 1 number the last 18 spins. Quite interesting.
For people trying this, it is possible for you to lose even betting two dozens up to 20 times in a row. This is a fact.
True I seen a dozen not come out for 38 times and you couldn't do 20 times because there is limits on table so your max goes would probably be 5 at most it's shite system
That's not true; I ran the simulation on a real wheel and my phone app and after 5 or 6 times it will hit
@@ivasoomluap math says otherwise buddy
@@samok481 exactly, he doesnt know the difference between likely and definetly
The odds are low though
“You have the system, we’ll send the limo.” - Every Casino Manager in History
I've played more systems than anyone and I'm still waiting for my limo.
I love the often repeated: "if they catch you doing a Martingale, they will back you off". If a pit boss ever did that, he is incredibly irrational, and should be fired immediately. I have played a lot of poker, and have counted cards for 25 years at BJ, and have never met a pit boss who is that stupid.
I just downloaded a roulette game on my phone and I lost all of the coins with this strategy in a matter of minutes. Think twice if you want to bet real money this way.
Martingale works,until it does not.
The assumption is, whatever you are chasing" has to happen" after 8-9-10 consecutive loses.
Until that S.O.B. occasion comes along,and, let's say, you get 13 odd numbers, and then a zero for good measure, in a row, or 16 red numbers in a row.
I like what you guys do, but I wish you would only play the strategy you are testing. It can be confusing when you both are running different strategies simultaneously.
What would also be nice is if dude on the right would stop babbling. Also, a little more explanation would be good. Maybe I could keep up if whitey shut his pie hole.
agree with you
Very confusing
David only plays the donks, or the losing spots
What they're doing is playing the strategy while the other guy is betting what isn't part of the strategy. Then comparing ... in this case both won. Yet the strategy was much higher saying that it's a good one to bet. Also you don't have to bet every spin.
At like 4:20 the bald dude laughed like the king from Clash Royale dawg I’m rollin😂
I tried this with $.50 units online and made over $100 before losing a level 5 bet. Seems like a pretty good system to me 👀
What is a unit
@@brockrohn360 A single chip. Since chips can be multiple values, “unit” is used to say one chip of whatever value your betting.
Instead of saying “I bet 30 on two dozens and 20 on two corners in the remaining dozen”, you can just say “3 units on two dozens of your choice, 2 units on two separate corners in the remaining dozen”.
Hope that makes sense.
Bro you're talking about CHIPS AND SALSA. Nachos are a whole other menu item. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk
Here is a strategy I am testing. Start $2500. Bet $100 on 0 & 00. wait for 2 consecutive colors(red or back) to come up and then bet $200 on the opposite with Martingale while maintaining the $100 bet on 0 & 00. Betting on color won't make you money but it will allow you to play 0 & 00 for free until it hits. It requires patience and many spins
Did you have any success with it?
This makes no mathematical sense. Martingale is in no way practical. This is why casinos have table limits.
@@zerozebrano he didn't. Easy maths to show he went broke.
@@BJTemujinEven without limits, Elon Musk couldn’t hold out long enough if the wheel hated him. At some point, you would have to bet more money than exists in the entire world, just to win your original bet(s) back.
4 spins is 2300... Lose 4 in a row and have 200 left???? Doesn't seem promising. Unless you hit 0 or 00 within those 4 spins.
An experienced croupier told us in Beau Rivage he can put the ball in certain sections of the wheel. That's what we play, certain sections and WE WIN (most of the time) and take the casino's money home!!
I call BS on that guy. It may seem to him that he can do that, but in a legit wheel, with a solid wheel spin and average or above ball release velocity, it’s 100.000% pure random.
This all sounds great, but I’ve lost 7 in a row once, and was out. That hurt.
i lost 13 in a row with my best friend also playing ....LMAO... MOST EXPENSIVE BEER OF MY LIFE.
7 in a row.? That's called a Tuesday for me. I've lost 15 out of 16 spins.
You should increase your bet after a win, not a loss. Then you are playing with house money, not your own. Win five in a row and then start over. It's not guaranteed but it's better than Martingale.
@@TheodoreChristen thats a terrible iidea?! hahaha, you win right up until you lose the last bet and because youve been doubling up, you also lose everything you had originally won in that win streak! lol
with the martigale, the key is simply to just have a massive bankroll to back you. Ive lost 23 times in a row, and the world record streak happened back in the wild west days and the streak is 36. I dont know enough to be able to say that all 36 were eeither all black or all red, Im just going to assume that there must have been some green in there, or maybe they were switching back and forth each game, meaning that each game was going back and forth in opposition to the losing bets betwqeen red and black, or odds and evens, etc
I tried this and lost everything as 2nd 12 didn't hit for the first 9 spins. Be careful out there.
Same here mine went up to 13 and it didn’t hit
Sounds like your roulette wheel needs to be calibrated... 9 spins is too many
As I mentioned to Eric above, your roulette wheel may be in need of calibration@@alitoroghi8435
@@ivasoomluaplol
@@ivasoomluap😂😂😂 yeah it would be nice if roulette numbers always came up when the odds say they should. I saw Five 9’s in a row one time. I’ve seen 20+ blacks in a row before.
Nice System, started whit $72 and ended whit $445, not bad starting whit a small balance, but one thing if I assure you is that your heart will be beating so hard of adrenaline :)
TBH i didn't understand the system...can you explain?
he started off with 25 to each...then how did he martingale after a loss or a win?
@@ammygaming2817on a win, the bet remains at $25. If a loss then Martingale ( 25, 50, 150, 450, 1350 ) . Once you win with increased bet you reset to $25 again. Each dozen or column betted is treated separately.
Not a good system. Notice how seldom 1st dozen came up. I've seen 11 dozens come up in succession recently. Ultimately you can't beat the bank.
Does David think the chips and salsa at a Mexican restaurant are "nachos"? He said it like a dozen times. How do neither of you correct him?
He didn’t even know what salsa was…he called it stuff and dip.
Thank you! Chips and Salsa bro.
10k lol!!! the video was entertaining as always guys. Thank you and merry Christmas.
Beautiful! This vid is made in a way that you can tell how smart these 2 are right from the start so you don't waste any more time!
In fact, you could already tell from the title with the wrong percentage xD
@@sebastiandierks7919 You know what I mean?
The 99.999% math hurts me. You should probably make that 99.9% to go with the story of 1 out of 1,000.
^This
No logic
Not to mention probably an exaggeration on the 999 out of 1000 lol
They didn't win 999 times and lose once they don't tell you how many wins out of 1000 spins they are both deluded and stupid
I got my monthly from stake today ( 134 $ ) then found this video turned that 134 into 1700 after a few hours lmao a few scary moments but I ran
who taught you maths? 99.999% win rate would require 1 loss out of 100,000 spins. 1/1000 is only 99.9%. All the best for Christmas
Pardon me for saying so but who taught you spelling "maths"??
Pardon me, but who taught you Capitalization?
@@billjohnson8783 maths is British English lol
I can confirm as a British citizen that we do indeed say maths
👍👍👍👍good man 😂😂
I was so into the Nacho talk lmao. These are the conversations we need to have with the public!
ONCE in 1000 spins ??...I call shenanigans
Mathematically impossible
Placing your bets across the board including coloums with only 2 donks.. the 3 and 0 increase bet on loss 3700% (x37) with enough bank roll for a 4th bullet!!
Yo, been testing this on a single 0 at mgm on low bets. Starting bank 4, ending at over 8 over 35 rolls. 100% increase. Going to try the higher bets next. It's a pretty good system!
And I just doubled up again
And after 3 hours, I made it to 10x my starting bank roll
what's your play method exactly ??
@@aymenamamou4030 slightly modded to this system, both dozens are played as a single bet instead, triple MG both bets on loss (keep the bets on the same dozens, or alternate on loss, your choice), if it hits, keep the bet the same and switch one of the dozens, but always playing middle. Return to initial bet after hitting on an MG spin.
Walk at 3 consecutive losses or two 0s in a row, or when you've reached your ideal profit.
This method is slow, very slow (1 unit gain on every hit), so if you're playing low bets online it can take a while. Big bets, it starts to get scary when you're at the 3rd/4th triple. A 10 initial bet becomes 90 by the third loss (130 total), and the 4th is a 270 bet (400 total loss if you lose on the 4th.) Big bets on this system need a HUGE bankroll to be able to float at least 4 - 5 losses.
This is not 100% and 5 bad spins in a row can break you if you're not careful, so be mindful of when your luck is starting to turn, and dont be afraid to walk or reduce bets if you're not seeing the results you like.
Sorry…there is no such thing as luck involved in these games. They have percentages that are built in….it’s math. Yes you can win at certain points but the more you play you HAVE to lose. Also, any system that doubles up or adds on losses will eventually reach the house limit and you’re done. You guys know this, right?
Dude is geeked out of his mind lol.
Sniffing. Can’t stop fidgeting.
👃🏽
☁️☁️☁️☁️
Good job detective! another case cracked wide open! Keep up the good work. as it has nothing to do with the info he was passing out.
Noticed this immediately
I haven’t been in a Mexican restaurant that gives complimentary nachos. They all bring complimentary chips and salsa in the Mexican restaurants I eat at (in Texas).
Nachos is a dish consisting of chips covered with refried beans, meat, cheese, jalapeños plus or minus some ingredient’s.
FYI, kale is not really traditional but escarole in pasta would be. Though similar, escarole is more bitter than kale, with wider, more tender leaves.
Bum bum
you right seems like every spin has them in the brink of bisexuality
"A little TOOO much LGBTQ+ Humor for me...
😂💀 interesting take
Or awkwardly keep kissing lol
@@joeschmo8115😂😂😂
I tried a system of betting red/black/red/black/red etc. the online casino immediately went on a run of giving me 28 losses in a row. Odds of over 2 million to one against.
That’s the GOAT system I play all the time. Play with slight modifications 💵💵💵
So you will be able to answer my questions: Why go from 25-50-150-450-1350-4050 ??? Why not simply try to regain your losses: 25-25-50-100-200-400-800-1600 ????
1:09 in.. I’m lost
Yup
Thank you for this video!! It looks like a good system!!! You both are FUN to watch!!! I agree, it looks like a grapefruit, if you have a good bankroll!!! 👏🏻
I have better strat but also needs a big bank roll
Man you know how to pick back ground music. One of the best sound tracks, to a game. God love it.
next video I should count how many times David says "you know what i mean?"
Its the adderall
Look at you buddy😀
I know, you know what I mean
@@rafarafa4838 did you watch the dragon system video?
@@soappy1720 Don't think so
That guy with the glasses is aggravating the piss out of the other guy. Its hard to follow 2 martingales at the same time...
Did this system. Went broke. Guess the .01% got me
the one guy talks to much
Agreed.
Cause he was nervous lol
You know what I mean.
It's called coke, a massive line of coke,, not even joking, 100% they are on coke
@@scottpeters1847😂
Saw it hit in first 12 or 0/00 eighteen times in a row at Casino Royale when someone was doing this exact system! 💯 no bs.
Damn so that person never hit!?
that right there is why i wont be trying this system ..cause the would be my luck
@@Rick6767rick damn that sux!! Yeah i once was going for 3rd column at El Cortez. Went 13 times without a hit. I was done after that.
I would be more comfortable alternating the dozens the leaving it the same
That’s why you can use this system, but you gotta wait until the same dozen is hit 6 times in a row first, then play the other 2.
This is going to sound like a silly question -
but I'm confused by the numbers you gave for the increased bet sizes
if martingale is typically double the last bet
shouldn't the numbers be 25, 50, 100, 200, 400?
The numbers you mentioned were 25, 50, 150, 450, and 1350
Sorry to be annoying I just really want to understand
I have the same question also it went from 25 to 50 (x2) to 150 (x3) to 450 (x3) to 1350 (3x)?
I was thinking the same thing. Must be that new math I have heard so much about????? How about an explanation on why it's not doubled on a loss like the system rule says.
Yea these guys need to be more consistent
I'm assuming it's because you're betting on a 1/3 out come rather than a 1/2
I was fooling around with all three thirds the other day. Martingale all three and shit gets crazy.
Not a good idea to do that for real..
Love watching these play the single 0 version I’m learning but I’m a couple thousand up in the first 3 weeks I play live online I usually wait till it’s a 3 run and then go opposites covering multiple upto 3 at once there’s deffo money to be made I’m just fine tuning my system will soon be living my best life
Well what's the update?
Ok,I saw your strategy. Now here is mine and it's a money maker. First,we all know there 38 numbers. 2 Green 18 black,18 red. Now when you go to play roulette just watch the colors that are coming out the most. For example,if red is the dominant color. Then put money on all of the red numbers and also money on green. In that red color,there will be number that are repeating. So put extra money on those. I put $3 on green and I put $2 on all 18 numbers. I will put $4 on the numbers that repeat in that red color. You will do the same will black if you feel black . Remember to always back green with whatever color you choose to bet. I make good money doing this. You can't bet every hand you have to be very patient and discipline. The money will come to you trust me.
Statistics say that 5 percent of players constantly win at casinos. This number is pretty stable and has not changed in years. Nobody knows exactly how they do it, because mathematically it is impossible due to the house edge.
Casinos know these people and apparently tolerate them, probably thinking that they are best free publicity for gambling.
Albert Einstein supposedly once said: “No one can win at roulette unless he steals money from the table while the croupier isn't looking.
I'm sure he meant in the long run but in the short run we can be all be rich 😎
Now you likely can't. There is a reason they change croupiers often.
A tired spinner with muscle memory, odds can tip in your favour by increased chance of landing in an area of the wheel.
@@BJTemujin yeah right.
any proof of that??
@leonvdm any proof that somebody performing the same action a thousand times a day for years who is required to monitor a dozen people, making dozens of bets each spin likely gets into a subconscious routine?
@@BJTemujinany proof that the wheel specifically designed to give as random an output as possible, after hundreds of years of refinement, can be defeated by a tired guy?
@markkealy4417 reality? Every camera and procedure a casino has to limit having a biased wheel?
Unless the wheel, spun by the hands of a human or the ball, spun by the hands of a human, are intercepted by random or predetermined interference to the spin of the wheel, then the croupier is a large part of where the ball lands.
It isn't about a croupier having the skill, or muscle memory to land in a specific number. It is about the ability to land in a quadrant 26%+ of the time, or landing within 18 numbers 55%+ of the time.
Either gives you a better edge than card counting blackjack and it just needs bare minimum getting within 34 spots more than expected.
I’ve found an altered martingale that you double plus a bet each level. So it’s 1,3,7,15,31,63,127. That way you win a bet each roll rather than each time you win
At what point do you stop the Martingale on each of the bets? Do you go back to the $50 bet after a win? Does that start the 15 rolls over? or do you just play out 15 rolls? There is a lot of talking going on. it would be awesome on each of these systems if you all would make a summary card at the end with the system name.
REALLY....THEY TALK FAST, JABBER A lot AND MOVE SOOOO QUICKLY
Hi I can help!
I was the submitter;
In this case Alex is doing the 25 dollar minimum bet version.
The bets are
25/50/150/450/1350/4050
Each time you lose on a dozen you put out the next bet in the chain. Once the bet is hit you go back to base bet of 25 and move it to the dozen you weren’t on. This is a change to what you see in the video because Alex misunderstood me when I explained it to him.
Hope it helps! If you reply I will check this every so often.
@@rystalquinnWhat would be the martingale best for $10 minimum?
It won't work, seen the same dozen hit more then 10x in a row
I like this system. However, on rare occasion one of the dozen will hit 7 times in row. That's when i don't like about it. In addition, there's the zeroes.
This system is best used in craps. No zeroes. However, it is a grind and have to do it with a partner. I did a modified martingale.
1:30 into this, and their comments are so jargon-heavy, I have no idea what any of it means
99.9% of the time you win $25
.1% of the time you go broke
100% of the time you will have fun
Wrong out of 1000 spins they didn't win 999 think about it
Casinos love players that use this strategy. The player only ever wins a very small amount of money equal to the starting bet of the run but when they lose, they lose everything. The stratergy only works if you start with infinite money.
Hello there I’m not quite understanding the betting system can you send the system spread sheet please sir thank you very much
why bother. the system doesn't work anyway.. no strat will help at this game. so if you play it, it had better be enjoyable
I used to do the same thing on the 4 and 10 on craps. Made good money. Only hit the max once at MGM.
the coke snort and drain tho
I thought it only was driving me crazy. 😆
Noticed it immediately
How to recognize when skill or strategy or method makes absolutely no difference: can you lose on purpose? No? Than it's gambling and there's no strategy. Stop listening to these scammers.
Going to have to watch this carefully a few times. I blew my bankroll working a progression on a single dozen. What are the odds it misses 13 spins in a row?
The odds are pretty low. But, as s with everything roulette, low odds doesn't mean it's not going to happen. I've seen it miss a certain dozen 15 times in a row 3 times in a 100 spins
@@Sajith050683 and that is why I'm never going back to the table. Hang with em!
On a 6 million spins simulation the most misses was 46 spins (happened once), 12 misses happened with a 0,43% frequency
I did this with black / red.
I made a lot of money.
You
First have to wait for the same color to hit 4x in a row, then start betting the opposite color. Start at $10.
2.5 your bet each time. You get 8 bets before you hit the table limit.
You will win eventually and make money.
If this actually worked, you would have (and would currently be) continuously be making more and more money, and eventually reaching higher and higher limit roulette. There are tables out there with $25K minimum and $500K maximum.
Why are you playing $10 roulette tables if you "win eventually and make [a lot of] money"?
In the end, there is no system that does not result in catastrophic losses. Casinos are a business, not a charity. Roulette has never been beaten.
If there was, you'd be the richest person in the world.
Kind of reminds me of the “hands of Midas.” Treating each bet as a separate bet to martingale. Although this one has bigger upside on high martingale hits. This system is an ulcer waiting to happen though. 😂
i love the system it may even be a grapefruit. but i would most definatly would start lower at a 5 or 10$ limit which i can find because i live in Ky and all of the casinos around us are smaller ones and we have to drive 2 hrs to any of those small casinos so i need to win just to cover the cost of going. we are usually comped a room but that isnt much if we paid for them so i guess our comps could be used better. idk I would like you all to do a Baccarat system that you think Mikki Mase uses if you think you know what he done to win all of the money he did
I don't get these numbers at all! You put 450 on 2nd dozen, you won and you get 2650? WTF? Dozen pays back the bet's 3x so it should be 450x3 that is 1350, minus the the 450 bet so the profit is 900. Please dont fool people!
6:39 Kale Pasta 🍝 important element to the strategy
Albert Einstein was once reported to have said the only way you can win at roulette is to steal the chips from the table.
There is no way to beat the odds in roulette. Every spin of the wheel is like it's never been spun before. Unlike, say, Black Jack where the cards are removed from the deck once dealt which affects the subsequent odds, each spin of the wheel is like a new deck of cards thus any previous sequence is irrelevant.
Internet scammers con their audience by recording and narrating several sessions using their 'winning strategy' then just post the ones that win by chance.
white guy -durian Asian guy -peach... nacho's are always on the menu chips n salsa are the appetizer like bread n olive oil at an Italian restaurant...
Can someone write down how the bets change if you lose and win
It's simple 50 /150/450/1350 and it's a shite system it don't work you eventually lose
avg amount of spins to hit a 20 loosing streak in a row is 2,564 ( lets say 2,500)
avg of 2500 spins at £1 was £7,140 profit (Avg £2.85 profit per spin)
if we follow the Fibonacci sequence 1-20 the bank roll is £15,736 a profit of £-8,596
you need a minimum of £6.30 profit per spin.
The strategy seems profitable because you only make money and never lose it if you don't go bankrupt
but the last spin doesn't effect the next spin and will eventually hit the max bet loosing more than
you've earned.
I was interested in your technique. Not the conversation. So, at 8:39 in, I wrote this and left. Too bad.
That’s exactly when I left the video, to the second.
I've ran a simulation with this and the risk of ruin on a 1k bankroll is about 50-75% and I updated it to have as many spins as possible
1st time testing this and 3rd 12 didn't hit for 13 spins. 2nd Time 1st 12 didn't hit for 8. That's the risk my friends. Be responsible and good luck to all
I seen a dozen not hit for 38 times
I've seen it hit 32 times in a row
@@silverscar25 still risky
I tried the strategy where you switch from one colour to the other and do a double bet, it doesn’t work. I found out it’s actually safer to stick to one colour, you can be real lucky or unlucky since that colour can be the same 30+ times. But most likely you’ll hit the betting limit and lose anyway with any given system.
One of the worst systems lol
Explain why ah ? It’s exactly the same as winning on red or black
But it’s not red or black pay 1 to 1
Most common folk don't have $3000 to put on a roulette table, this sucks
Check out my numbers !
Usually, cannot loose means cannot Win
The roulette wheel isn't random in a computer we have pretty good randomness but it's actually not that good because we rely on entropy and it can get really low. This is when can see it.
I cry laughing every time Alex says, "$10,000 buy in! (insert Alex grin and head nod)" 🤣
and say "you know what I mean?"
Another variation of the martingale strategy. It might work if the tables didn't have limits and you could use an unlimited bank roll and quit when you hit big. Also, they overlooked the greens.
Tried this strategy the other night! Worked until the 8th spin. They hit almost 18 spins in the 1st 12 I stayed with the strategy and had 3 cycles of losses hitting my stop lost. I hit that 0.01% 3 times in a row. It was unreal 😢playing the 2nd 12 and 3rd 12 last night. I went to another table same result playing starting with 15 and doubling it
With every loss 🤦🏾♂️
18 SPINS on the 1st dozen? I have never seen that, 16 is the most I have seen. But I just start gambling on roulette since 2023 began, just 6 months.
I feel your pain. I have had this done to me multiple times. It's so common for the wheel to hit same dozen more then 6 or 7 times. V
I've gotten wacked many times. One time it hitting 19 times in first column and I was on second and third. Lost 10k my worst loss ever. I took a break after that cuz my mental health was at its lowest.
It has to do with ball spinner too. Ask them how long been playing with company? And look for dealer change hand. Those are stop loss for players
As weird as this sounds... but seems to be a Universe thing. Go with Momentum. The thought process of. Oh, it hit black 10 times, it has to go red. It doesn't have to do anything, but if you see a rhythm happening. Try and go with that. There's no science behind this, its not tangible, but can definitely be felt. You see it happen at tables all the time. When someone gets "hot". or to the contrary. When someone runs cold. Just not in the right timing. Need to able to either switch to the 1st 12 in this case, or walk away... wishing you great luck on your next try...
@@jorgeperezochoa8504 I've seen 32 hits in a row on a column or dozen before
10:15 he mis-spoke when mentioning 'nachos'. He really meant "chips". ALL restaurants charge for NACHOS since those are an entree dish. But most serve chips as a free courtesy.
99.99% to loose your Entire Bankroll strategy!
Love these videos
But thissystem is the ultimate durian system. It could be Worse, but the one martingale is bad enough. Two different where you need the table to switch gently around to not Get one of the bets too high. Just straight up big nope.
Would love positive Martingale, but with one bet
I’m imagining running 2 positive martingales on 1:1 to bet
And 2 dozen/column positive fibonnacci. Would be pretty fun
What TOTAL BS clickbait dishonest misleading title & thumbnail ! Shame on these creators.
Well he got the title for it from my little blurb I wrote about the system. Sorry about that I guess?
Agree. The only sure winners are the casinos. Do people really think the casino would run a game if there was only way for the odds to be in favour of the customer?
Hey quick question, why did you go from 50 to 150? love the channel btw! cheers
The logic is that the bets of $25 are the ones that actually turn a profit, while the tripling bets of $50, $150, $450, $1350, and so forth are for loss recovery.
Let's start with the 2 bets of $25, each placed on a different dozen. There are two possible outcomes:
1. One of the $25 bets wins, earning $50 on a 2 to 1 payout. However, because both bets cannot win at the same time, the other $25 bet necessarily loses, so the player walks away with $25 in profit.
2. Neither of the bets win. In that case, the player is down $50 from both $25 bets losing.
Okay, so let's assume we lost the first round and we're down $50. How do we zero that out? By increasing the bets themselves to $50. If we win, we'll earn $100. $50 of that will cover the other bet we just made that didn't win, and the other $50 will cover the 2 losing $25 bets. We're free to make $25 bets again and try to make some money.
...But what if we lose? Can we just double the bets from $50 to $100? No. If a $100 bet wins, it'll earn $200- but it won't fully offset the $250 we're down: $100 from the failed bet this round, the two failed $50 bets from the round before that, and the two original failed $25 bets.
To get to the point where we break even on our losses, we need to triple our bets from $50, not double them. $150 earns $300, which covers the failed $150 bet, the two failed $50 bets, and the two failed $25 bets. Any following round of this is an extension of the same logic.
All this being said: please do not try this in real life. If you have to try it, do it with _very_ small denominations as your base- $1 or $2. The exponential nature of loss means you can quickly bite off more than you can chew.
It is so hard to follow what you guys are doing and how the system is working when you are attempting to be funny talking about other stuff. The strategies are interesting its so hard to follow along and try to concentrate on it.
I like the banter but definitely need on screen text so I can follow along. At the very least put the system in writing in the description.
@@RickNorthwest I think they need to talk in units instead of dollars it is impossible to keep it straight when they arent even really talking about it after the first minute
You absolutely can beat the system. You have to not get greedy and know when to walk away.... And YES, the casino will still win, by taking from those who don't know how to play. My girlfriend and I used to do $200 per day, 5 days a week using an advanced Martingale system. We won way more than we ever lost, in fact it got boring in the end, and we stopped going. Some days they would take us off the table and offer us a free steak dinner in the restaurant, cos it was cheaper for them if we were not at the table.
Mathematically, to get a 99.999% win chance, you would need to have £6,553,575 if you was playing just 1 of the 3rds, as to get the odds of 33% up to 99.999% you have to run it 18 times. But running 2 side by side is very interesting. As it may actually reduce your risk, as if one runs cold, you still have slight income from the other. As you make more money also, you can afford to run it more times making it less likely to fail on you. I will have to find a way to work out the % chance of failure running 2 side by side and get back to you.
Yeah well buddy i went to vegas in a 60k dollar car and i left on a 500k bus trying this.
@@Fightingturtle404 Congrats. The math is still right. The odds where still technically against you. Getting lucky is how every success story is made when it comes to gambling.
For every 1 person who brags about this working. multiple people are shamefully hiding all their losses.
@@StocksNShares you missed the joke :P
@@Fightingturtle404 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kinda hit the ceiling before that. The max bet but everything broken one way is broken 2 ways.
When I first started playing I made my own insanely stupid strat where u start with 300 and bet 50 on the most common colour if it pays out play it again. If it didn't pay then you put 75 on the other color and then if it pays out go back to 50 on the same color and repeat