Hamlet Analysis: Act 4 Scene 1 2 3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @jememe5209
    @jememe5209 2 роки тому +6

    I’m not even studying literature or English, but I am a huge literature nerd - so these videos are awesome! Thanks so much!

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  2 роки тому +2

      My pleasure. Glad you like them. Keep reading:)

  • @yasmin5413
    @yasmin5413 Рік тому +4

    you have honestly saved me with my alevels you deserve endless prizes you are a saint an dshould be so proud of yourself!

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому

      Thank you for the kind words, Yasmin. Glad you found the videos useful:)

  • @gegsdbdhdvdvd1271
    @gegsdbdhdvdvd1271 Рік тому

    this helped a lot. thank you so much!

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому

      You're very welcome, G. Glad you found it useful:)

  • @lucydebosier
    @lucydebosier 3 роки тому +2

    this was very helpful for my ap lit class, thank you!

  • @spikespiegel2332
    @spikespiegel2332 Рік тому +2

    Sir, what about the body is with the king but the king is not with the body...?

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому

      Very good question, Spike. I'm gunna cheat a bit here and quote from Arden's Hamlet notes by
      Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor:
      “This pretty piece of chiasmus [the wordplay of reversing the parallel terms body and King] sounds impressive but is singularly reluctant to yield up a sense that can be apprehended by an audience in a theatre. Intended as a riddle, it remains a riddle’ (Hibbard). Jennens, however, explains, ‘The body, being in the palace, might be said to be with the king; though the king, not being in the same room with the body, was not with the body.’ Hamlet might also mean that the King is not with the body in the sense that he is not (yet) dead. Other editors suggest an allusion to the theory of the king’s two bodies (natural and political), whereby Hamlet casts doubt on the legitimacy of this king, implying that his kingship does not reside in his physical body (see Jenkins, LN).”

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому

      I think the "king’s two bodies" explanation makes the most sense.

    • @spikespiegel2332
      @spikespiegel2332 Рік тому

      @@5QShakespeare Sir, I think its about may the body of the king is existing, He rules, speaks and makes decisions. But "the body is not with the king" means the lack of the qualities of a king(personality like king hamlet), a right one that not just a body on the throne. Did u Catch the idea? What do u think about that?

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому

      @@spikespiegel2332Yeah, that makes sense. Lack of fitness and legitimacy.

  • @hussamalhassn
    @hussamalhassn Рік тому

    Where is the body of Polonius ?
    Please I need answer this question ❤

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому +1

      "But if indeed you find him not within this month, you shall nose him as you go up the stairs into the lobby."

  • @marouamaroua2995
    @marouamaroua2995 Рік тому

    What do we mean by *the body is with the king but the king is not with the body ?

    • @5QShakespeare
      @5QShakespeare  Рік тому

      Tricky riddle that. This is the explanation from Arden Shakespeare: "The body, being in the palace, might be said to be with the king; though the king, not being in the same room with the body, was not with the body.’ Hamlet might also mean that the King is not with the body in the sense that he is not (yet) dead. Other editors suggest an allusion to the theory of the king’s two bodies (natural and political), whereby Hamlet casts doubt on the legitimacy of this king, implying that his kingship does not reside in his physical body ”- Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor