Thanks for the update on the development! Would you also make a visual introduction just like with the Mehta method as well? It was such a useful video!
Hi Bamboo Cuber, superb tutorial! It is so clear and well done that I'm currently giving this method a try (beginner way for the moment) and will possibly switch, depending on my progress. I also wanted to point out that there is at least 3 errors in the "Alg sheet (UPDATED)": - for 6CP-2, the last "D' " for the Headlights-Adjacent case should not be here - a "D" is missing at the end for the Adjacent-Headlights case - for the Opposite-Opposite case, the "F' " should not be here I hope there soon will be some videos of actual fast solves to make people want to get started!
Hey gueldaswing, thanks for the kind words! Hope you enjoy trying out the Mehta method. The extra D or F moves at the end of 6CP-2 algs move the FB to the back. This prepares for white edge insert with M' U2 M However, having a white edge on the top layer only happens 50% of the time. When there isn't, the extra move should be ignored Thanks for pointing it out! I've clarified it on the alg sheet I'm pretty excited to see what Mehta is capable of. The fastest user I'm aware of is Zeke, and here are some of their solves: www.twitch.tv/videos/865944245 I also hope there will be more fast solves, it will indeed encourage more beginners to give it a shot!
It would be great to see a tutorial for the APB method, the website is very hard to follow along. It seems very interesting, and I wouldn't say promising quite yet until I know more about it. Again, a 'tutorial' or even an update to the website would be much appreciated by many people, I'm sure.
Indeed! It's the second best case in full 6CP, which advanced Mehta-6CP solvers will know. The video only shows the beginner variant (2-look 6CP) which is less efficient. Or, intuitively you may be solving both white corners (this is a step called DCAL in the Mehta-CDRLL path) and it luckily solves all the top corners as well.
@VictheCuber it’s not the greatest method compared to the others. Sure it’s got a low move count but it’s moves are very intuitive and it’s practically impossible to turn at 10 tps using Petrus where as it’s quite easy for top solvers to do that. Petrus was much better in the past as they did not have great cubes and it was more import to be move efficient.
Great! I find other solution for 6CP1, that solve both bottom corner and then solve white edge (M' U2 M) and then just solve PLL. For me is better and faster (i know full PLL) (this variant 2CP+1EP (2step APDR?)+PLL). For 9:38 just do U' R2 U' R2 and you solve both bottom corner. And for 6CO1 if one corner oriented in bottom layer and one corner oriented in upper layer then you just can use R2 U R2 or R2 U' R2 (in 8:59 just make U2 R2 U R2). And why for EO clock case (in 8:31) you dont use F URU'R' F'?
I think your variant is faster than beginner 6CP that was taught in the video. However, full 6CP does 6CP and L5EP in one step each, which has a pretty low movecount and can be even faster. Beginner 6CP is an introduction to the 6CP path, but if you come up with your own variant that you already know the algs for (PLL), then by all means use it! For 6CO1, the step is designed to orient the bottom corners based entirely on what you see on the top. This improves lookahead by removing the need to peek at the bottom of the cube to see what's already oriented there. That said, you can probably see me looking at the bottom corners in the video anyway :D The alg I used for that EO case is one move shorter but also more awkward than F U R U' R' F'. I honestly don't know which one is better, and Mehta algs are constantly evolving. Great questions!
There are two things that make Mehta seem more complicated: 1. Mehta doesn't repeat steps. CFOP, Roux, Mehta all have many steps, but F2L is repeated four times and Roux blocks are done twice. But all Mehta steps are distinct and done once per solve. 2. Beginner Mehta splits many steps into even more substeps (reduces alg count). So we end up with a whopping 9 steps! Same idea as CFOP 4LLL However, beginner Mehta is actually straightforward once learned, because 7 of the 9 steps are algorithmic. No thinking is required for almost all of the solve!
Do you have any tips on how to memorize a lot of algs fast? I just started learning full CMLL but it's very difficult. How can I make it easier to learn?
Ok ok so i dont doubt how efficient this method is, and how this is actually probably better than CFOP.... But all those algorithms are too much for my brain for now(i dont even know CFOP 😂). But i really love how this method starts (Roux First Block + Belt) so I took that and combined it with end part of 8355. Aka, only 1 algorithm required, AKA ultra newb mode 🤣
*UPDATE: There's a new, better method called APB! Check it out here: ua-cam.com/video/ckpVaOiv898/v-deo.html
Is there gonna be a video tutorial that we can follow along?
Thanks for the update on the development! Would you also make a visual introduction just like with the Mehta method as well? It was such a useful video!
@@FrankyyCubez yep there is one now ua-cam.com/video/ckpVaOiv898/v-deo.html
It’s a very cool video (unbiased opinion)
I did a few solves using this method, it felt like solving a different puzzle
im gonna try learning it just to have more fun with 3x3 cuz using cfop over and over gets quite boring
@@yBryan1 you can try your it's fly good
@@thecubingotaku8192 what
Great tutorial! This method deserves to be used more.
Lol our profile pics #canva
Hi Bamboo Cuber, superb tutorial! It is so clear and well done that I'm currently giving this method a try (beginner way for the moment) and will possibly switch, depending on my progress.
I also wanted to point out that there is at least 3 errors in the "Alg sheet (UPDATED)":
- for 6CP-2, the last "D' " for the Headlights-Adjacent case should not be here
- a "D" is missing at the end for the Adjacent-Headlights case
- for the Opposite-Opposite case, the "F' " should not be here
I hope there soon will be some videos of actual fast solves to make people want to get started!
Hey gueldaswing, thanks for the kind words! Hope you enjoy trying out the Mehta method.
The extra D or F moves at the end of 6CP-2 algs move the FB to the back. This prepares for white edge insert with M' U2 M
However, having a white edge on the top layer only happens 50% of the time. When there isn't, the extra move should be ignored
Thanks for pointing it out! I've clarified it on the alg sheet
I'm pretty excited to see what Mehta is capable of. The fastest user I'm aware of is Zeke, and here are some of their solves:
www.twitch.tv/videos/865944245
I also hope there will be more fast solves, it will indeed encourage more beginners to give it a shot!
combination of roux, cfop, belt and square 1 lol
What?
Thanks for sharing! Really excited about this method!
thank you for teaching an old dog some new tricks, and elegantly,
subscribed
Wow... that's so Mehta
It would be great to see a tutorial for the APB method, the website is very hard to follow along. It seems very interesting, and I wouldn't say promising quite yet until I know more about it. Again, a 'tutorial' or even an update to the website would be much appreciated by many people, I'm sure.
ua-cam.com/video/ckpVaOiv898/v-deo.html
A new method... i was not expecting this
A main issue I see with this method is the lack of skipping these steps is virtually impossible
9:43 U' R2 U' R2 solves the corners way faster
Indeed! It's the second best case in full 6CP, which advanced Mehta-6CP solvers will know. The video only shows the beginner variant (2-look 6CP) which is less efficient.
Or, intuitively you may be solving both white corners (this is a step called DCAL in the Mehta-CDRLL path) and it luckily solves all the top corners as well.
Very well done video. This method looks really interesting. I've got to try it!
Thank you! I finish my cube to your mehta method!
THE FACT THAT THIS IS ALMOST THE SAME AS MY LAST NAME MAKING ME LEARN IT
cool
you know, I don't normally care about new methods, but this is actually fun.
this method looks so cool, like 40 moves per solve???? insane
or you could just use petrus
@@darkk9999 Petrus is actually good.
@VictheCuber it’s not the greatest method compared to the others. Sure it’s got a low move count but it’s moves are very intuitive and it’s practically impossible to turn at 10 tps using Petrus where as it’s quite easy for top solvers to do that.
Petrus was much better in the past as they did not have great cubes and it was more import to be move efficient.
Dang new method nicee
looks interesting, might give it a try.
Hyphen alg kinda sus 😳
i'm sorry
S' U S
Sir new methods .but intresting. & Confujing to do.i was download this video for practice.
I don't see the photos of the cube in the DCAL alg sheet
yo the hyphen case alg is "sus" wtf
i was going to write it but i saw this
Great! I find other solution for 6CP1, that solve both bottom corner and then solve white edge (M' U2 M) and then just solve PLL. For me is better and faster (i know full PLL) (this variant 2CP+1EP (2step APDR?)+PLL). For 9:38 just do U' R2 U' R2 and you solve both bottom corner.
And for 6CO1 if one corner oriented in bottom layer and one corner oriented in upper layer then you just can use R2 U R2 or R2 U' R2 (in 8:59 just make U2 R2 U R2).
And why for EO clock case (in 8:31) you dont use F URU'R' F'?
I think your variant is faster than beginner 6CP that was taught in the video. However, full 6CP does 6CP and L5EP in one step each, which has a pretty low movecount and can be even faster. Beginner 6CP is an introduction to the 6CP path, but if you come up with your own variant that you already know the algs for (PLL), then by all means use it!
For 6CO1, the step is designed to orient the bottom corners based entirely on what you see on the top. This improves lookahead by removing the need to peek at the bottom of the cube to see what's already oriented there. That said, you can probably see me looking at the bottom corners in the video anyway :D
The alg I used for that EO case is one move shorter but also more awkward than F U R U' R' F'. I honestly don't know which one is better, and Mehta algs are constantly evolving.
Great questions!
Kinda similar on how I solve Araumq cube but they are different in mechanism.
would it be viable to do a 3/4 cross, followed by two f2l pairs and then just insert the last two edges to finish the belt? psuedo pairs perhaps ?
that is what tao does
During cp1 there seems to be a parity, forcing an extra t perm
If this is just me please tell me how to fix this lol
Remember to recognize the 6CP-2 case correctly, that should fix the problem!
2:55 hyphen and dot cases are a little sus
0:42 the scramble is in the description
Where's the updated version
3:26 I've found a trick to skip 6CO1 for that case
also on 4:05, you can do R2 into 6CO2 and cancel the last R move with the R2
This seems way more complicated than cfop or roux.
There are two things that make Mehta seem more complicated:
1. Mehta doesn't repeat steps. CFOP, Roux, Mehta all have many steps, but F2L is repeated four times and Roux blocks are done twice. But all Mehta steps are distinct and done once per solve.
2. Beginner Mehta splits many steps into even more substeps (reduces alg count). So we end up with a whopping 9 steps! Same idea as CFOP 4LLL
However, beginner Mehta is actually straightforward once learned, because 7 of the 9 steps are algorithmic. No thinking is required for almost all of the solve!
Do you have any tips on how to memorize a lot of algs fast? I just started learning full CMLL but it's very difficult. How can I make it easier to learn?
3:31 SUS
sorry I needed to
amogus
@@bamboocuber5609 y e s
What a good video, why is it the only one ? :(
This is a amazing
bamboo cuber mehta tutorial
Can you make a video on the 42 method.
Would this be good for oh like is it rotationless
bro the Tetris method is the best method.
What?
if advanced solver influenced next steps in TDR the average would be closer to 40 than 46
No, it probably wouldn't improve the movecount by very much if at all
Belt?
essentially F2L edges solved
There is no way this is faster than cfop
have you seen apb?
@@eduardoxenofonte4004 yeah, i saw it after this video but is it actually faster than cfop? Everything seems to be decent but idk if lookahead is
Ok ok so i dont doubt how efficient this method is, and how this is actually probably better than CFOP.... But all those algorithms are too much for my brain for now(i dont even know CFOP 😂).
But i really love how this method starts (Roux First Block + Belt) so I took that and combined it with end part of 8355. Aka, only 1 algorithm required, AKA ultra newb mode 🤣
That's actually a really cool idea
or you can just do petrus
If you learn Mehta-OS or Mehta-TDR you can't just use Petrus cuz it'll be slower
ZZ?
No
yes
Can't beat CFOP bro
Not at the optimisation that cfop’s at now
@@rujon288 Yup
Thanksssss I got 1 minute just like on petrus method
Dang err0r you a nerd lul ; )
This video didn't help me
Ok? Good for you ig.
@@frogleap8504fair statement to me lol