Spider-Man: No Way Home - A Satisfying Mess | Video Essay
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 гру 2021
- 💻 Go to squarespace.com/filmspeak to save 10% off your first purchase using code FILMSPEAK
🕸 FilmSpeak talks about Spider-Man: No Way Home - A Satisfying Mess and crowd pleaser but does that make it a perfect Spider-Man Movie? This video essay dives into the good, bad, and ugly.
🔔 SUBSCRIBE: ua-cam.com/users/filmspeak?sub_con...
Tom Holland's climactic third Spider Man movie in the Homecoming Trilogy has finally arrived and is not only making waves among comic book fans, but it's also breaking records at the box office as well. No Way Home brings the nostalgia, it brings the fan service, callbacks, easter eggs, all of those little bits that get audiences excited in a theater, but is it TOO much nostalgia, is it TOO reliant on legacy? Well, yes...and no. Spider Man No Way Home is a tale of two halves. The first is everything I feared it would be from the no way home trailers: cheap, gratuitous fan service that felt more gimmicky than necessary while also struggling to really make sense of the catalyst for everything. Then...something remarkable happens. This new spiderman movie takes a shift and actually lets its guard down enough to become emotionally genuine and sincere, something I didn't think was possible for MCU spider-man. It's the quintessential Peter Parker and Spider-Man story I've been dying to see from Tom Holland Spider Man. Spiderman no way home is at its best when it uses the past as a means to discuss second chances and packs an emotional wallop that makes for some of the best spidey moments of all time. OH, and it also brings back Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire proving to the world that Andrew Garfield is still the best Spider Man and we need a TASM 3. Griffin (@griffschiller) gives you his Spider-Man: No Way Home spoiler review and breaks down what spider man no way home gets right and what spider man no way home gets wrong, why spider-man no way home is good, not great, and breaks down the satisfying mess of a movie in this video essay!
#SpiderManNoWayHome #SpiderMan #VideoEssay #SpiderManNoWayHomeReview #NoWayHome #AndrewGarfield
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🎞 Chapters 🎞
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🎞 About Spider-Man: No Way Home 🎞
With Spider-Man's identity now revealed, our friendly neighborhood web-slinger is unmasked and no longer able to separate his normal life as Peter Parker from the high stakes of being a superhero. When Peter asks for help from Doctor Strange, the stakes become even more dangerous, forcing him to discover what it truly means to be Spider-Man.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▶️ Other Amazing Videos ◀️
🔀 More MARVELOUS Videos: • MARVELous Video Essays
📺 CLICK for more videos on the Web-Head: • Why The Amazing Spider...
▶️ About FilmSpeak ◀️
Welcome to FilmSpeak hosted by Griffin Schiller, where the conversation continues after the credits. If you'd like to become a part of that conversation, consider subscribing for more thoughtful and exclusive insight, analysis, and interviews behind YOUR favorite movies!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
❗️ My UA-cam Gear 📺 ❗️
Camera 🎥: Sony a7iii ➡️ amzn.to/3poCJaz
Microphone 🎙: Shure SM7B ➡️ amzn.to/3jVWYeO
Lights 💡: Elgato Key Light Air ➡️ amzn.to/3prCFXy
Tripod: Joby Gorillapod ➡️ amzn.to/2NbC5QQ
Live Stream Capture Card: Elgato Cam Link 4K ➡️ amzn.to/3s5TwRP
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Follow FilmSpeak on Social Media
► Visit FilmSpeak's Homepage: filmspeak.net/
► Twitter: / _filmspeak
► Instagram: / griffschiller
► Facebook: / filmspeakofficial - Розваги
Comment YOUR thoughts on NWH below and thanks again to Squarespace💻Don't forget to visit squarespace.com/filmspeak to save 10% off your first purchase using code FILMSPEAK!
I think it is important to remember that Dr. Strange doesn’t have the Time Stone anymore. It is one of the first lines he says to Peter. He can’t check the future to see the possibilities of what will happen anymore. He can’t make a decision on a leap of faith. That’s why he wasn’t too out of character in this movie. If he had the time stone, he would have somehow guided Peter to the correct path and not let him make the mistakes that could cause the universe to break. This Peter Parker turned to dust and then everything came back to normal when the heroes saved the day. He doesn’t see how this will be any different than when the world was saved before. The trailers led me to believe that Peter runs to Dr. Strange right after his identity is discovered. No, he waits and lives with it for months until he realized he ruined the futures of two people he cares about. Then he goes to Dr. Strange who he remembered from saving the universe together.
In my opinion, I adore the MCU'S Spider Man movie trilogy and consider it the best Spider Man series and superhero trilogy ever.
Hey bud. I felt it was extremely good but also highly flawed. None of the flaws were enough to truly hold it back from greatness for me, but I fully get how it could to some. Excited to see your take.
I agree that the first half is kinda meh but the second half is just….just perfect.
I actually like the first half more. Don’t get me wrong, bringing all 3 spider-man’s into the fold was awesome! I think the action was slowed down a bit too much for the goodbyes.
The biggest twist wasn’t even the multiverse stuff but the fact that the whole trilogy was actually the origin story for this Peter
And after they said they weren’t doing to origin again, I don’t know how people stand by this. If they were going to do the origin again I feel like they should’ve just owned it and gotten it out of the way because now it just feels like the last 5 years of Spider-Man content was a bit of a waste of time
@@perfectbidoof7541 It’s a different twist on the origin though. The one that people are mostly done with is one that revolves around the good ol’ spider bite, Uncle Ben’s death and whatnot. These movies overstretch the origin to explore new territories, one that people never expected
@@perfectbidoof7541 I’m sorry but I disagree. All the prior stuff was fun and fluffy Spider-Man content and it will always be that. I’m glad it exists. But that isn’t true to the character and now he is more akin to previous versions. I know people were tired of the origin story and that’s why I think doing it this way actually works. I think they owned it by making it the final film and such a big event at that, no?
@Rhetiq 99 For 2/3 of these films, the new territory was kinda worthless. There isn’t much continuity and u can tell the plan wasn’t do redo the origin, so it’s not some big mastermind of a twist. The probably just didn’t know what to do and needed to course correct, so they went back to telling the origin even tho Civil War showed us Peter had already been through his origin. It just feels redundant, but I honestly wouldn’t care if they hadn’t been so adamant about not doing the origin again. Tbh if they did the classic one at this point I wouldn’t even care, just as long as they do it right and don’t bloat it. The MCU should’ve just taken the PS4 route and aged Peter up cause only through NWH did I start to feel anything for Tom’s Peter and that’s just cause he’s confirmed having gone through some version of the origin now, yet the PS4 game was able to make me feel for Peter through new writing whilst doing what the MCU set out to do and avoiding the origin (but in the case of the game, without disregarding it entirely for two films then retreading it when they didn’t know what else to do)
It took five years, three solo films and three crossovers to do what took other films, shows and games a bit over or under an hour each to do
I like the way Andrew's Peter sees the other Peters like brothers- the family he never knew he had.
That was such a wholesome line!
That's because he was alone in his own world
Only the uneducated ones don’t know this or you’re just too delusional and not understand what’s really going on here. This movie is a 👎👎👎. Only in Kevin Feige’s dumb little mind that Spider-Man can beat Dr.Strange in dr.strange own dimension when we all really know that dr.strange is way more powerful than Spider-Man. Also, Dr.Strange can make Spider-Man not escape or hold him in place without escaping or kill Spider-Man without even trying. Don’t y’all see what’s going on here? Kevin Feige is slowly nerfing marvel characters. He did it to hulk already and now it’s dr. Strange turn.
@@SUKADIK4 Dr Strange was obviously going easy on peter since he's a kid and don't forget that peter has a genius level intellect.
@@SUKADIK4 everything gotta make sense to you or wha? I’m there to watch Spider-Man mess mfs up, not see doctor strange destroy Peter
If you noticed Tobey Spider-Man never let the other 2 Spider-Men beat themselves up. He’s was used to doubting himself, so he knows to give his younger multi version of himself confidence
It was funny calling The amazing Spider-Man movies actor amazing as well.
@@ryateo1 Yeah that was an amazing moment
@@leenolan1469 yall w these puns is so.. amazing
@@ryateo1 Even with that, I think they went a little over-the-top. I caught the ‘Amazing’ Spider-Man reference the first time Tobey said it, but I’m a pretty avid Marvel fan, so maybe saying it a couple more times was good. But saying “amazing” like FIFTY TIMES in that scene, for me, once again took me out of the film for a moment.
(Anyways, just a nitpick really and only a symptom of my problem with the movie lol)
@@ZapPack my 9-year-old and I snickered and giggled at that scene in the theater because we got it.... Whatever you may think of it, the joke was not lost on my kid and I.
I'm one of three brothers, and that scene reminded me a lot of when me and my brothers get together.
Your explanation for why Aunt May shouldn’t have died is the very reason why killing her off makes sense. Having anyone else die wouldn’t have had the effect on Peter Parker that her death did
Stupid and pointless.... Not even gonna try to argue since there's always an explanation or excuse. Gwen Stacy had a sadder death and it hit home harder than aunt may. Uncle Ben from the raimi and Marc Webb movies had a sadder death. Aunt may in all other movies were better than this aunt may. Her death was also stupid like the glider sliced her from the side and peter didn't see that? It would have been much more brutal if she exploded in the Goblin bombs. Much more brutal and sad. MCU no blood since it is a kids movie 🤦♂️
Or make him our Spider-Man. Then again, He thought matrix 4 was perfection so I dont put stock in this guys opinion.
@@PiPo2707 'Not even gonna try to argue' immediately followed by 7 sentences of argument 😂
Not much of a strong counter on your parIvan. n.
@@viviwayfinder That's how stupid these whiney "fans" are. 😂🤣😂
Why do people throw “fan service” around like it’s a dirty word? This is an event 20 years in the making, the fans made it the success it is, why is giving them what they want a bad thing?
Cause it means the writers don’t have to work as hard to create good material since they’re already juggling it from previous iterations, so it makes compare something like NWH to something like Spider-Man 2 or ITSV a lot less fair. It’s not bad, people just feel cheated out because it’s almost everywhere now
Because "fan service" is just out of ideas rehash. For instance, Tobey's movies were not fan service when they were made, they were just great movies made. That later, when used it is fan service because they became classics. Its not a problem for fan service to come up every now and then. But usually when its packed in an entire movie that comes after 2 movies before it. Its basically mcu saying, "we have no idea how to make a great Spiderman film on its own, so we'll just give you a bunch of fan service for this one".
People love to complain and be miserable and holier than thou
@@thecensoredmuscle563 wrong, this is toms orgin story, the next 3 movies will make him shine
Because fans dont know what they want, fans that loved Peter using a trillion dollar suit, that loved him living under Tony's shadow, now love how he is a poor broken young man who made his own spandex suit who foesnt mention "Mr Stark" a single time during this whole movie.
Doctor Strange was EXACTLY the same in Infinity War. He said he wouldn't hesitate to let Tony Stark and Peter die to protect the universe. He WAS just as callous. He also gave up the stone because it was the only way. Letting the universe get wiped out is pretty callous of you ask me. He's pragmatic. That's his character.
Edit: Thanks for all the likes
Wdym?
He is very different in this movie than he is in Infinity War. He's a lot more careless. Criminally so...
100% agreed @boughtwithblood7 . He's only more careless in this one because he can afford to be. Dr Strange has always been arrogant and interested in experimenting and trying new things out. It's intrinsic to his character in the comics and we've seen glimpses of it in the movies. Just because he went on a mystical journey and became more humble doesn't mean he is humble. He still very much can be an arrogant jerk.
Yeah he’s entirely wrong with the doctor strange rant. Doctor strange was entirely in character, wanting to not change the fate of 5 already bad people to ensure the whole universe survives. Dunno what he was on.
I don't see too much of a difference in Doctor Strange throughout the movies, and I don't quite agree with the whole Strange believing in miracles. Even in Infinity War, Strange had to go through 14000000 outcomes to see how they win against Thanos, that's why he sacrificed himself and give Thanos the stone because he already knew that would lead them to their victory. I don't think that's believing in miracles but believing in pure facts
@@KyngD469 He's not careless, he literally said no and then ended up doing it out of Spite because Wong told him not to. He even makes reference to having used the spell on previous occasions for much more minor things. The problem arose when Peter started asking for the spell to be tweaked, which honestly, is something that Spider-man would do.
Strange had a Thanos mentality for wanting things to be the way they were “supposed” to? I completely disagree with your take on this. Strange’s rationale wasn’t that if the villains die the world will be a better place. We’re talking about the guy who looked at millions of outcomes to determine what events needed to happen in order to defeat thanos- strange understands that all events have a domino effect, and drastically changing the course of ones life (like stopping them from dying when they’re fated to die) will have consequences in a larger context. Strange was motivated by preserving the workings of destiny while thanos was motivated by the universe’s limited resources.
The people Thanos killed were never meant to originally die. Thanos made an active decision to kill half the universe. The villains who were meant to die, were always meant to die and that fate cannot be changed. Strange understood that. It's kind of like Strange Supreme In WHAT IF. If Strange Supreme had not gone back to save Christine even though he had the power to do so that wouldn't mean that he is killing her, it would mean that he is accepting her fate. When Strange Supreme saved Christine it lead to the death of his entire reality.
This video essay has quite a fee weird blocks in logic. Seems like he just wanted to get an essay out for clicks. Ride that wave and we all fell for it.
@@discolullaby5777 I was thinking the same thing
@@discolullaby5777 A VERY weird take indeed.
My favourite detail about Andrew saving MJ was that he swung them around mid air so that if he were to fail, he was the one to hit the ground first, giving MJ a greater chance at survival
And this is how we learn!! From our mistakes!! Lol it would be...interesting, being a superheroe's friend...I wonder if you'd still get life insurance🤔😂
Andrew stole the show, Tobey gave me nostalgia and Tom earned my respect
Tom's acting was a absolutely spot on. Had me tearing up multiple times. Tobey for sure brought the nostalgia & felt like a great mentor figure. Hyped for another Andrew Spiderman film now!
@@leenolan1469 i hope for tobey Spiderman 4 After that a Andrew one with a better script i hope
@@jasminkrieger8464 Fingers crossed
@@iamgroot3391 yeah
@@jasminkrieger8464 why? there's no need for a spiderman 4, tobeys story is wrapped up. But andrew definitely needs one last movie to complete his trilogy
I'm sorry, but did you forget that Doc Ock used Aunt May as a shield against the cops and Spider-Man? Hell he even dropped her to distract Peter. Not only that but he risked half of New York due to his pride in trying to make his experiment work.
As for Dr. Strange, he's right. Why risk the multiverse for the sake of some villains? He was being logical.
And for Peter to go to Strange right away is also pretty logical too, anyone would have immediately done that. There was nothing Peter could have done, even if he tried to be responsible, the whole world was already against him.
Norman also didn't use himself as a test subject because he couldn't fathom the fact of being a failure. His entire career was in jeopardy, he only had 2 weeks for results, so he had no time to get other human test subjects. He basically took a scientific risk out of desperation.
Thanks for pointing these out!
Great points! Thank you!
Also Ock threatened to "peel the flesh off her bones" (idle threat maybe, but still).
And the hospital scene.
And all the people on the train that would be in real trouble if Peter couldn't stop it.
And (as you said) only half of New York.
He is talking about them BEFORE they become villains.
Of course, you can make the case both the serum and the arms just amplified a part of them that was already there, but that is besides the point.
Before their accidents, Norman was a jerk (he still loved Harry, cared for Peter, and was willing to die for his company, though) while Otto was a super nice guy who took 2 hours of his time to talk about life with some random kid he just met.
@@Jose-se9pu Bruh whether your a jerk or if you find yourself in a whole bother universe where you have no son, no business, none of his riches, no Peter? He’s truly lost and just wants to get back home.
THAT WAS AFTER HE WAS CONTROLLED BY THE ARMS
One thing i was really surprised about, was Jameson in this movie.
In all other Movies & the Games, he is played more for laughs in my opinion, but in this movie he is pretty vicious & what he does takes a toll on Peter.
Social media more cruel than actual media now
I couldn't agree less. He is a complete joke a wasted in the MCU
@@MrMightyEthan bruh that’s literally his whole character. That’s how he’s supposed to be he’s just comedic relief. What did he did too Peter in the raimi films? Printed some bad press? Cool. Jameson in FFH literally helped expose his identity to the world and pretty much all of New York. Not to mention that absolute slander he got after his Aunt Died.
Hopefully his ruthlessness will pave the way for him funding the Scorpion project for Spider-Man 4 like in the comics, and actually put some use into the post credits scene for Homecoming
@@MrMightyEthan Wasted? This is the second appearance of an ongoing character, calm your tits.
11:34 Strange definitely was like that in Infinity War. He never agreed with sacrifice on as large of a scale as Thanos, but he did say numerous times that he would let any individual (particularly Stark) die before letting Thanos get the time stone. When he eventually did give Thanos the time stone, it was only because he looked into 14 million possible futures and saving Stark was the only way to win, not because he was against sacrifice.
Strange was definitely acting mathematically, not emotionally. The only possible winning outcome was if Stark survived, so he did what he needed to for Stark to survive. A very small chance of winning is larger than 0.
True when in this video he says strange didn’t back lpetal which he did in infinity war
This is the guy who said he’d let Peter (who at the time was 16) die in space to stop Thanos.
@@samuelbarber6177 exactly
bro, you're watching a Marvel movie. the good guys are ALWAYS going to win, despite whatever bs probabilities Strange throws at you. you know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
That doesn’t make him a heartless person
This film was beautiful. Andrew’s Peter becoming darker because of Gwen’s death is OUTSTANDING, him looking at Peter and MJ with a heartbroken look before being reminded by Tobey that he can find love again is brilliant.
I love the fact that “Great Power, comes Great Responsibility” connects the Peter’s just as much as their names and their masks.
Them talking about their own unique individual heartbreaks, comparing villains and Tobey and Andrew being AWFUL partners because they aren’t used to it and that’s when Holland’s Spider-Man to me establishes himself with this one moment as a different Spider-Man by becoming a leader and making them work together successfully as a team because he was an Avenger and learnt how to work in a team quickly.
The ending to this film is perfect and genuinely got me so excited for the future. An apartment, a homemade suit that looks and feels like Spider-Man, a fun swing through New York and a Spider-Boy being replaced by the Spider-Man. Peter leaving Ned and MJ after he made the world forget who Peter Parker is so he can let them live a happy life (something he always wanted for them) is perfect and a great ending to the trilogy, I expect to see them in Iron Heart as she is in MIT with them.
And yes, I want to see TASM 3.
Makes you wonder why they went with that weird speech Ben gives in Amazing 1, trying to save the same thing, without saying it...if it aint broken, dont fix it!
@@Jose-se9pu doesn’t make me wonder at all. They wanted it to be different to the Raimi films and they didn’t want him to say the same thing because it would be to similar to the Raimi films, it failed. Sometimes it’s fine to just say “great power, great responsibility”.
@@liamhemstock2286 ehhh...as a kid i didn’t really got what great power great responsibility meant, but in TASM we at least get an explanation like any parent would, y’know?
how u gon talk all this abt no way home and not even bring up tom's amazing acting
@@kunii.9261 some good old dad'splaining
Just gonna come out and say that Ben most likely passed naturally and probably peacefully. Most likely when Peter was very young, so he may have never really known him
Yeah is seems to me that this MCU Uncle Ben just isn’t as important
maybe there isn't even an uncle Ben in this universe, I don't think he's ever been mentioned and I doubt we ever will in the future after the events of this movie
@@lewisgibson228 he was mentioned in homecoming in the scene where Ned finds out that Peter is Spider-Man. And given Aunt May’s age it’s unlikely that her husband died whilst Peter was super young
Maybe ben worked alot in the mcu when he was growing up and he was with his aunt alot, so when Aunt May dies it hits harder than Ben's death since while he was his uncle, aunt may was his attempted mother.
@@lewisgibson228 in far from home peters suitcase has the initials B.P so maybe stop adding on and accept the theory of the original comment
Honestly, I still think the first half of the film was really good and served a purpose because it allows us top contrast the more jokey, light-hearted tone of the "Home" trilogy and previews the more serious dramatic tone that we'll see in the next Tom Holland Spidey film.
The way I see it, the Homecoming trilogy is a more direct adaptation of Stan Lee's original run with Spider-Man, where the comic operated a lot more like a sitcom, and what happens in sitcoms? Everything works out by the end. Essentially, the "Home" trilogy is just updating the concept that Stan Lee first started with back when he first created Spider-Man.
No Way Home operates as a transition point that Spidey went through in the comics between the more sitcom-y high school era and the more dramatic College era. Now, the movies are free to explore that more dramatic College era of the character and I, for one, am extremely excited for it. Also, considering that the Raimi Spider-Man was more based on the College Era, it makes a lot of sense why some fans of previous incarnations of the Webhead didn't take to MCU Spidey at first.
So, I still think the movie works well and it isn't a tale of two halves. It still has moments where the pacing grinds to a halt, but I had a lot of fun with it so I don't mind it as much.
The first half was weak
@@toogoat9293 your incredibly detailed arguments are truly deep and well researched lol
@@brucesnow7125 I'm not like certain fanboys that write full page essays bro it's not that serious
@@toogoat9293 it’s not serious but we’re trying to analyze the film here not say stuff just cause
Fan-service is a term that is used to describe an act of generosity, compassion even ambition in works of fiction. On the other hand it is also perceived as unwarranted content for the sympathetic fandom.
No way home is a fan-servicing virtue of a film. What’s most surprising is the delicacy and focus on theme, character and narrative.
Granted the film deals with a multi-dimensional crisis (pun intended) of epic proportions however the film transcends emotional barriers by telling a thoughtful, inspiring and poignant story.
One that is heartfelt yet audacious, extravagant, yet sincere.
For fans and dabblers alike, satisfaction is a certainty as the film delivers the perfect gift of surprises, spectacle and most importantly soul. Is the film perfect? technically no, but depending on your expectations it may just be the ultimate Spider-Man film.
A true tear-jerker, a definite crowd-pleaser, an instant classic.
Stan Lee would be proud to know that with this film, his legacy is complete. His ingenious creation about a friendly neighbourhood hero has now subverted the language of cinema.
9.5/10
I'm gonna be honest. While I agree with a lot of what you said, I think you'd benefit from watching this movie a couple more times. You were pretty wrong about a lot of things. Also, Strange didn't give him a suit. He gave him a gauntlet that let's him teleport for a specific period time and immediately takes it away. Its just his normal suit turned inside out because they threw green paint on it. And he's shown struggling to get the paint off. Also the black and gold inside was hinted at during Homecoming. Plus it is literally called the inside out suit. Also going to his super friend to solve a problem because he's overwhelmed instead of thinking it through? You'd be surprised by how often he's done in the comics.
The film has plot holes and bad writing doesn't mean you can't enjoy the film.
i used to like this guys videos… and then his black widow video came out and nothing been the same since
@@supoa9489 says who?
@@NiggaChickenSticks says anyone who looks at this movie objectively. Like every movie, it has flaws, and some of the flaws are glaring with this movie in particular, doesn’t mean I and everyone else can’t love and adore it. Just be reasonable and admit that certain aspects of the film could’ve been handled better. That’s all the man is saying. Lol
@@TheWazzoGames so no one
I don't think the film was direspectful towards the legacy vilains at all. I think you've got got that very wrong . Yeah the Doc Ock joke wasn't great but I was baffled by your point about the legacy villains being disrespected.
Doc Ock gets a lot of disrespect in the first half of the movie, that freaking Disney music they play when Peter hacks his arms was...UGH.
Still, they got him back on track on the second half.
Even other video essays praising this movie say Doc Ock was pretty much a punching bag, and that Goblin was the only one who delivered fully with their interpretation lol
@@Jose-se9pu Nah I think it's important to show that Doc Ock isn't in full control of himself in this universe that he's outside the box of his comfort zone . Apart from the Octopus joke everything else . Also when he says all the legacy villains were insulted you can hardly insult the TASM Lizard and Electro as they were never that well written in first place the only way is up for them.
@@XRTVicious I haven't seen anybody saying that all I've seen is praise for Alfred Molina.
@@TheSt1092 I didn't imply he did a bad job whatsoever. It's much like Andrew Garfield. Amazing performance with the writing leaving a lot to be desired.
While I admire most of your takes on various films, to call ASM2 a perfect Spider-Man movie and No Way Home a mess, I’m having a hard time giving your arguments that much weight.
I do believe it is a mess. The fan service was the only one that overshadowed the bland story from the first half. His argument froma filmmaking and story standpoint make sense. People won't understand it because they've been swoon over the fact that three spiderman carried the show
dude this guy is bias as hell. i used to like his videos. and then he called black widow “the best” lmao
Not all of us going to agree. Did he actually say TASM 2 was the best? I didn’t hear that aha. Andrew definitely is the best actor of all. He understands and loves Spider-Man and is masterful. He was a victim of poor writing in TASM 2, I loved the original TASM
@@danrandall3302 I think he was referring to a previous video
@@danrandall3302 he made a video about it 😭
“i just think that it’s a bit out of character for this version or really any version of peter parker to resort to something so desperate and extreme” peter parker literally asked doctor strange to do the same exact thing in the COMICS…
He went to Strange originally because Aunt May was shot and was going to die though, when Mephisto altered the timeline One Moment in Time reveals he went because Aunt May was shot, and Mary Jane almost was killed by the criminal Mephisto freed. It was a bit more serious than No Way Home, but I think it works in both
@@nevandempsey9557 it definitely works in both because he didn’t even consider going to strange until it started hurting and affecting his loved ones
Yes, and that was a terrible universally hated story that is commonly criticized for being out of character. He's right.
Edit: actually he would be right in most cases, but I think it really worked in NWH
Lmfaoo really right he looks dumb now
@@Alejandro333777 No he doesn't. This guy who brought up One More Day/One Moment in Time as an example of good character writing for Peter is the one who looks dumb.
I feel like Tobey saving Green Goblin is also him finally being able to honor Harry’s sacrifice in Spider-Man 3 by saving Harry’s father.
Tobey never wanted to kill goblin, goblin got himself killed. Plus he was close to Norman so obviously would not want to see Norman die again. Of course the movie forgets that Tobeys Spiderman is close to Norman. Norman shows no care of Tobey, and acts like he doesn't even know tobeys Spiderman at all.
@@thecensoredmuscle563 Cause that wasn't Norman, that was the GREEN GOBLIN. Once Goblin is killed via the anti serum, Norman returns, sees his Peter stabbed and states: "What have I done?". Goddammit dude, pay attention!
@@jakubrejak1114 lol obviously I'm talking about after the serum when he becomes Norman. I just rewatched the end on a stream real quick, and sure enough, I was the one who payed attention unlike you. He looks at Holland and says "Peter", then looks and sees Tobey stabbed for a second or 2. Then looks at Holland for several seconds with a confused look and it sounds like he says to Holland "what happened?". So like I said, shows no care for Tobey, and acts like he doesn't know Tobey. he should have said "peter" to Tobey, and said "what happened?" to Tobey instead of Holland.
Next time, before wanting, God to damn stuff and telling someone to pay attention, makes sure that you payed attention.
That wasn’t Toby’s goblin. The movie never explained which Norman that was. Bad writing.
@@shanonsnyder9450 they explain it in the movie bruh. They are all taken from different points in time from there respective movies.
Think of it like this. The green goblin in this movie is taken from the point in time which he is fighting tobey on the bridge, the tobey that was pulled from his universe is a Tobey taken from years down the future in his universe so Goblin was taken from the end of Spider Man 1 and Tobey was taken from years past spider man 3.
Same goes for every single villain and hero in the movie. Andrew is taken from a point in time years after Gwens death, Electro is taken from when he was fighting andrew and about to explode, Lizard is taken when fighting Andrew on the rooftop, Sandman is taken at the end of Spider man 3, Doc Ock is taken before he turns good again by the river. If that doesnt make sense to you watch the last 15 minutes of Loki or What If on DISNEY+
Whenever one is pulled from the universe it creates a branch timeline so there is not one definitive timeline which means that for example, when Doc Ock gets pulled from Tobeys universe by the river, There is now 2 universes, One where Doc Ock gets pulled from the universe and he no longer is there to fight tobey or stop the sun so the sun might take over New york, and there is also another universe where he does not get pulled from the universe and the same event happens as we know it in spider man 2
I wouldn't exactly say Matt's inclusion was pointless considering high profile cases like these do typically require legal counsel to see how severe the charges actually are. Not to mention the fact that cameos like these really aren't meant to reintroduce a character. There are several moments like this in this video. Where you immediately go to one conclusion, this is inauthentic, lazy, was turned into a joke, without really trying to figure out what the scenes you're criticizing was trying to communicate. It doesn't seem very beneficial to a video essay format.
Agreed. The entire sequence after the Mysterio reveal is jump cuts. Criticizing 'how Matt got into thar room' is as useful as asking 'How did the all get to the police station?' . It felt like a perfect way to introduce Matt, short but got the point across.
This man really expected an origin story explanation of his life, how he got his powers, and how he became a avocado at law 😂 (the video maker)
@@ASKBryanNOT especially when its already on netflix
@@larryfoulkeofficial8609 *Sigh* that sadly didn’t age well
@@bennyduverna3018 disney plus now
Dr. Strange wanting to send the villains home to their death is out of character? Are you kidding? Him saying "in in the vast calculus of the multiverse, their sacrifice means infinitely more than their life" (paraphrased) is EXACTLY his justification for Stark's death. His priority has always been to protect reality over individual lives. Spider-Man is different because he tries to save individuals even at the risk of reality breaking down.
Everything the audience needs to know about nanotechnology is explained when Ock says "nanotechnology.. you've outdone yourself, Peter" while watching the nanotech form to his tentacles. It wasn't complicated.
The Goblin and Ock were not just easter eggs. Goblin's purpose was an extension of his 2002 portrayal. His powers are "gifts" and he convinces Elektro of that. He also wanted, yet again, to corrupt Spider-Man. Ock was the natural counterbalance to this perspective. Villains are not inherently evil. They are redeemable.
Why is the melding of Uncle Ben and Aunt May a bad thing? Do you really need a separate Uncle Ben to affect this Spider-Man in the effectively the same way? I'd argue that it was Gwen's death that affected Andrew's spidey more than Uncle Ben. After Ben died in the TASM universe, Peter's motivation for becoming Spider-Man was revenge. It wasn't until he saved that kid on the bridge that he saw his potential. Gwen's death, on the other hand, gives him the final push he needed to prioritize his responsibilities as Spider-Man OVER his desires as Peter Parker.
Ned having powers is fine. Why do people have an issue with this? They hinted at his potentially magical family early in the film. Are you really surprised that, in a universe where surgeon can turn into the sorcerer supreme or a man can turn into a hulk, Ned can have a magical background?
I personally hate the Ned thing because it not only comes out of nowhere- where was this in the past few films? Nowhere, but it's here now because its very convenient for the plot. It also undermines the training that Strange, a genius in his own right, had to do to get the Sling Ring to work. He had to shoved and on the brink of death at the top of Mount Everest to open one, but Ned- an absolute nobody who only had ONE throwaway line of build up at the start of the movie that can be equally written off as a joke- can do the same thing more than once just because he he thought about it some?
And why was he unable to close the portals? He literally did it before twice and they closed just fine but the one moment where they need him to be competent in their plan, he can't do it?
@@brucewayne8550
"Where was this in the past few films?" - Ned didn't have a sling ring in other films. Why wasn't his magical abilities brought up in other films? Idk. Maybe it was brought up off screen. Banner became professor hulk off screen. Peter develops a crush on MJ off screen. We didn't see May's moral compass until NWH. Is it lazy writing? Yes. But the MCU does this a lot so I've stopped making that criticism at this point.
"It also undermines Strange's training" - I don't think it does. Strange was a human trying to master the mystic arts. Ned has, as was alluded to in that joke line you mentioned, some magical background which makes tapping into that sorcery easier. The sling ring also clearly works on some sort of impulse.
"Why was he unable to close portals?" - there are a few theories I've heard about that. Again, it's an impulse thing. Maybe he couldn't close the portal as long as Peter was in imminent danger. Idk. My interpretation is that he's just new to magic and still figuring things out. We all cave under pressure. Even superstar basketball players miss free throws in crucial fourth quarter moments.
@@TheVijaiParadigm Agreed, it is lazy writing and so are the parts you mentioned. And I never made excuses for those, so I'm not gonna excuse this even though Spider-Man is the only reason I'm watching any MCU movie after Endgame.
And as for the Sling Ring needing impulse, I don't think so. It requires intent, otherwise anyone could use it right from the start and the training at Kamar Taj would be absolutely useless if anyone could use it on impulse. And again, it being treated as a throwaway joke at the start really undermines the intent of the line, to set Ned up as a sorcerer in training. It would have been more tolerable if it wasn't treated so flippantly or for comedy, but that's what it was treated as making the whole thing look more like a bad joke than a clever set up.
@@brucewayne8550 I agree that MCU overuses bathos and it undermines important moments.
dawg they gave Ned a magical ring that did all the magic lol plus it was only a plot device to bring in the other peters
"The brilliant Spider-Man: Lotus." That didn't age well.
The way Tobey doesn't say anything yet says so much with the look he gives Tom before he tries to kill Norman is amazing. Same with Andrew saving MJ . Andrew and Tobey gave their A game when they didn't need to
I think that not only the characters become better in the second half, but also the references. In the first half, "I'm something of a scientist myself" feels out of place and entirely for fan service. But when Doc Ock says "the power of the sun in my hand" to Tobey, it feels like he's making fun of who he was, what the arms were making him do, as you said, having a sweet conversation with his friend about his past mistakes... and also fan service, but the good one, I like to think.
Yep agreed which boggles my mind as to why they didn’t do it the way in the second half the whole time.
@@FilmSpeak Maybe time was a factor that affected, the movie is already long and they rushed the first half so much. I wouldn't mind extra time though 😂
I still loved the line, it was the cheapest fanservice posible, but Willem literally spitting a meme in the middle of the movie, it was great.
Of course, the fanservice becomes a lot better in the second half, but not gonna line, loved Norman saying that.
Fan-service is a term that is used to describe an act of generosity, compassion even ambition in works of fiction. On the other hand it is also perceived as unwarranted content for the sympathetic fandom.
No way home is a fan-servicing virtue of a film. What’s most surprising is the delicacy and focus on theme, character and narrative.
Granted the film deals with a multi-dimensional crisis (pun intended) of epic proportions however the film transcends emotional barriers by telling a thoughtful, inspiring and poignant story.
One that is heartfelt yet audacious, extravagant, yet sincere.
For fans and dabblers alike, satisfaction is a certainty as the film delivers the perfect gift of surprises, spectacle and most importantly soul. Is the film perfect? technically no, but depending on your expectations it may just be the ultimate Spider-Man film.
A true tear-jerker, a definite crowd-pleaser, an instant classic.
Stan Lee would be proud to know that with this film, his legacy is complete. His ingenious creation about a friendly neighbourhood hero has now subverted the language of cinema.
9.5/10
I always thought of that Norman meme as his catchphrase as a way to connect with similar intellectuals like himself.
And that’s why Andrew was as close as comic book accurate we got. and then some. I loved No way home. The first two entries of the trilogy. Very Disney heavy. But it kills me now everyone loves Andrew. I never been so invested in a spiderman defending him. I’m a X men stan.
Lol no hes not Tobey is
@@BBK113 what do mean? Andrew's is the best and the most accurate due to it actually tackling all the problems that come with being spider man. Tobey was great don't get me wrong. But Andrew was better.
@Erik Kemeey He was Ironman Jr. But now he's actually learning to have is own identity. I believe he'll be better in the future. Tom is a great actor and a great looking spider man but the writing team doesn't know the character at all. Amazing spider man was MUCH closer to the ultimate comics then Tom's are. Don't believe me read them. But in the end overall I wasn't a Tom fan. Andrew is my favorite but I did respect Tom's performance.
@Shoot they could've had something like this for the first one. The first two movies felt like shit.
@@prince_kash22 no LMAOOO tobey is
To each their own. I loved the Villains talking to eachother and Defoes "Im something of a scientist myself" was executed very well in context of what was going on in the plot.
Easily the funniest moment for me
Dude that line was so outta place
I still hated how they were sidelined or made some of them cartoonish like Lizard and Otto. They don’t treat them with enough respect like they did in their own movies and their own universes
Curt Connors is no longer the broken scientist who just wants to fix himself and find his missing pieces and wants to share that gift with the world but he’s turned into a dumb downed villain. He’s just another bad guy with no sympathy. And Otto who was a respectable scientist driven by hubris and pride which leads him to his redemption by remembering who he is and sacrifices himself as penance for his failings
How did murdock get in the room? What? That’s just asinine. So every time a scene changes are you wondering how the characters got to a new location? Murdock was needed because Peter was in need of a lawyer.
By this logic every movie is terrible unless we see every character walk in and out of every room they walk In
@@camraging641 lol. I know right.
But I get his point, like why is it daredevil? How? Wtf??
@@subjectively_objective it’s daredevil because Matt Murdock is a lawyer. People are really over thinking this. Matt is a practicing attorney. So every time he has a case in the future are you going to ask “why is it Daredevil?”
He isn't just a lawyer, he is a defense attorney that does pro bono which suited a poor Parker even if you don't consider that he might want to help out a costume hero.
Remember his like 16 or 17 so if the decision making feels dumb just remember this is a younger version of spider man even with how he trusted mysterio
Is this out of character for Dr. Strange? This guy has lived countless lives because of his use of the time stone, watching his own death. This guy has been living consequence free for eons, and during those lives he would just "try shit out" constantly.
Yes, It is out of character for Dr. Strange. You described why but somehow don't seem to hear your own words.
"This guy has lived countless lives"
^ He's *died* countless times sacrificing himself for the Universe.
"This guy has been living consequence free"
^ He has never been free of consequence. Good god how can you watch films and *not understand anything* that happens?
No wonder you like No Way Home. You're definitely the target audience.
That magic is difficult, has limits, and consequences is the whole theme of Dr. Strange's film.
_The bill comes due._ - Mordo.
*No Way Home* completely trashes his character.
In this film magic is easy, any goofball named Ned can do it, you can use it to do anything, and there are no consequences.
The reason this happens is because the Sony/SpiderMan writers *don't give a shix* about Dr. Strange - they just trash him for SpiderMan's sake.
Imagine if in Dr. Strange II - Raimi has Strange just give everyone Spider Powers, so now Peter is nothing special.
I bet you'd get the point then?! lol.
The reason this happens is a problem inherent in shared storytelling where filmmakers p!ss on the work that went before.
This is a result of conflict of interest and an almost subliminal competition between them.
This is what ruined the last Star Wars trilogy as it was practically a running argument between JJ Abrahams and Rian Johnson.
@@summertyme5748
It's the first time we've seen him without the time stone.
The thing he would use to do reckless stuff and immediately undo it.
I'm not reading all that stuff you wrote. I'm throwing theories around, don't lose your shit.
@@Jack-gm1sj "It's the first time we've seen him without the time stone."
No he didn't have the time stone until the end of the 1st film, but that is not the basis of his character and *never was.*
You don't seem to understand how character or themes work in film, in general.
In my opinion, I love all 3 Spider-Men, but I relate more to Tom Holland's Spidey. We basically saw an "origin" story in 3 separate films because of the larger MCU, something that the other previous Spider-Man movies never got the chance to do. We grew with Tom's Peter, and while I understand why people thought he was "Iron Boy Jr." he really wasn't, Spider-Man was a kid, using everything to his advantage, & now that he has lost literally everything & everyone, and starts from scratch, while in the MCU, and I love that. It makes me appreciate the Homecoming trilogy even more. It may have taken 5 years, and for some it seems like "finally", but to me, I understand him more. That still doesn't mean I don't like Tobey's Or Andrew's take on Spider-Man, but Tom is more relatable to me.
He was Ironboy jr just because he changed doesn't make what he was before not true
@@supoa9489 that's your opinion, I may not agree with it, but I respect it.
Homecoming and far from home aren't Origin stories at all. The MCU made this extremely clear. We have no idea how he became spiderman, and what's his motivation? We still don't know.
@@kojoyamoah414 I put air quotes on the word origin because while it's not an origin in the way he gets his powers, it is an origin about a teenager, becoming a young adult.
@@josenation Still doesn't make it a Spiderman origin's story. You're just trying to fit a narrative into a place where there isn't room for it.
I disagree with your take on Peter for the beginning of the movie. Yes he acts irresponsible and irrationally, but you also gotta take into consideration that he is under an extreme amount of stress and anxiety. I don’t think anyone would be thinking straight if they were going through what he was
Dude let supervillains walk around freely. Stop.
@@blackmanwithcomputer I’m referring to the part of the video where FilmSpeak calls Peter irresponsible for going straight to Dr. Strange for help rather than try and plead his case to MIT.
You all forget that Peter is a kid, a human that makes mistakes like we all do.
Get the fuck off your moral high ground.
@@discolullaby5777 He's 17. There's no excuse to be that stupid. Especially after being a hero for years. There's no way he hasn't gotten civilians killed being that stupid. He even left the Lizard outside unattended to, for hours.
He could've just taken the fabricator to Strange's home, because he only took them to Happy's apartment to use it. He's a dumbass to take supervillains he doesn't know and can't control out into a freaking apartment complex full of civilians.
They should've added more of a struggle at the beginning, a more complex reason where Peter DESPERATELY had to go to Doctor Strange
"he's just Tony's ward"
*immediately plays a clip of him designing his own suit without the help of Tony aside from just using old stark tech to do it*
This really felt like the conclusion to a 3 movie long origin story. Tom's Peter feels like he's actually become spider-man at long last. He finally grasped the responsibility he carries with the power he has. I wasn't a huge fan of the other 2 MCU spider-man movies but I fucking loved this one. I'm gonna wait a bit to say for sure, but it may be a contender for my favorite spidey film. No other spider-man movie or any movie for that matter made me have such a big grin on my face the whole time.
Yeah I agree I couldn't stop smiling but mostly because it was like a spiderman comic come to life and also had the some elements of the animated series
I totally agree with that
Homecoming was just OK for me. FFH I actually thought was pretty damn epic. Mysterio was a hard one to pull off but they definitely did it. NWH though is now my 2nd favourite MCU film, after Infinity War. Toms acting was absolutely spot on & I can't wait to see him come back under the current circumstances. Especially vs Venom! Everything just worked for me.
I got emotional in the theater at the ending of No Way Home, thinking of how proud Tony would be of Peter. I was proud of Peter.
Aunt mays death being the new uncle Ben moment is very welcome as before we always saw Peter react to a character we've known for 20 mins. This time we react with Peter as may is a fully realized character we've seen for 4 movies now. Way more impactful and I'm glad they didn't just do uncle Ben again. Simply doing the same story over and over because that's how it's always been done is lazy
To be fair to Peter, as someone who also recently started college, I had no idea you could contact a university directly and ask to be reconsidered.
Yes but was your first course of action to hit up your local wizard for some time travel shenanigans?
Matt Murdock:
It was done really well. He was not useless. He's supposed to be just a lawyer who we side eye at the end of his scene. Obviously he'll be back later. For fans we know who it is and for casuals they will be intrigued. Also it's 2021 and this is the most popular movie in the world. They will either Google who Matt is or somebody will tell them dude. They don't need to be corny and beat us over the head with it.
_It was done really well. He was not useless._
it was a cheap cameo. Exactly the opposite of KingPin showing up in Hawkeye or Kang in Loki. Both of which are just flat out better written than No Way Home.. Sorry..
While all of that is true…it’s also lazy writing and the definition of empty meaningless fan service. If you introduce a character they have to mean something to the people in the world and their presence has to make sense. Yeah, Matt’s a lawyer, but there’s no introduction to how the Parker’s meet him or anything. Even including a brief scene of Matt knocking on their door as he usually does when people need legal help would’ve had the scene make more sense. I love that he’s back, but c’mon.
@@FilmSpeak You want them to show them driving to his office? Show Peter using the bathroom in it? That's unessacary. He found a good lawyer and it happened to be Matt Murdock, that's all you need to know. Anything else is filler for fillers sake and to satisfy online nitpicky critics of everything. It's a reach. Not everything has to be some galaxy brain writing exercise
@@FilmSpeak _If you introduce a character they have to mean something to the people in the world and their presence has to make sense._
Correct. The fans of this film are fans of SpiderMan period. Like fans of Batman and Superman they are defending their 'love' of the character and not objectively assessing the films. To criticize the film is to call their baby ugly at which point they *cannot* hear anything else you say.
_You want them to show them driving to his office?_
^ case in point. that wasn't remotely what he was saying, but you don't want to hear his point so you intentionally twisted it so you dont have to acknowledge it. lol
11:40 bro in infinity war Dr. Strange said he’d let Peter die to protect the time stone. It’s very accurate to his character.
I desagreed with you about doctor strange, like he only sacrificed him self in end game because he knew that was the only way for their reality, but here he was kinda right in not wanted to help the vilans because they actually died in their realty, and some times changing it could cause worst repercussion so it doesn't worth it.
Exactly. Also, he was EXACTLY the same in Infinity War. Doctor Strange said he wouldn't hesitate to let Tony Stark and Peter die to protect the universe. He WAS just as callous. He also gave up the stone because it was the only way. Letting the universe get wiped out is pretty callous of you ask me. He's pragmatic. That's his character.
Peter didnt just want to reverse Mysterio framing him because of the college issue, it was because he was actively ruining MJ and Ned's lives merely by being associated with him. It's easy to say "Just suck it up and deal with it", but the truth is that the people he loves suffer. He and May had to move in with Happy just to escape people throwing bricks through his windows. The reason Strange helped him was NOT because Peter was wallowing in self-pity. It was was because he pleaded _for his friends_ . And while MJ addresses how he did this behind their backs and that it was too impulsive, it was never a selfish action.
Doctor Strange literally told Tony that he would not _hesitate_ to sacrifice him and Peter if he had to do it to protect the time stone in Infinity War. How could you possibly claim that it is out of character for him to send the villains back to how things should be in their universes to protect his reality? Strange has become the kind of person who sees the biggest scope and ignore the little guy, which is the exact opposite of Peter's philosophy. I think you completely got him wrong.
The villains are not just nostalgia bait, you are basically the only one who claims that. Of the dozens of reviews I've seen most people straight up praise how accurate or subdued the villains are and how they arent just there to be there. Another strike to how confused your interpretation seems.
Your obssesion with Uncle Ben HAVING to be the catalyst for becoming Spider-man is so rigid and confusingly forced. Is Peter dating Gwen Stacy in Amazing Spider-man an insult to Maryjane, because she is the one always associated first with Peter Parker's girlfriend/wife? Fuck off. Peter was already Spider-man _before_ meeting Ironman. It is clear that in the MCU he already wanted to be heroic because of how May raised him and how he was inspired by Ironman as a child. All the goodness in Peter came from May and being in a world of heroes. It's beautiful and unique. May's presence in No Way Home is just a bookend to his childhood and helps him to finally grow up.
I agree with you on May. One thing I never really considered in regards to WHY Peter became Spider-Man in the new trilogy is I guess whether or not it really matters. At the end of the day, we KNOW Peter is a heroic kid, we KNOW he wants to do the right thing, and May shows us she's the one who directs & guides him to do that. Do we really NEED to see a spider bite, or a tragic moment that makes Peter Spider-Man? No--what matters is that he's a hero, and what the writers choose to do to develop his character is what we should judge them by--not the asinine things that we already know & take for granted.
That May is his guidance & not Ben doesn't matter--they're there as concepts, not as constants. You don't HAVE to have an Uncle Ben, or an Aunt May, a Mary Jane or a Gwen Stacy to make a Spider-Man story gripping. You don't even need Peter Parker! You just need to have a hero who slings webs & climbs on walls who's incredibly emotionally relatable. That's always been the core of what makes a good Spider-Man to me.
Dr. Strange trusts his intelligence and instincts on things he has mastered, not on things he knows "frighteningly" very little about like the Multiverse. He straight up told Peter that in No Way Home. That's probably why he seemed so cold-hearted compared to Peter's attitude towards the villains.
He is a surgeon thats why
The entire time I was watching the movie, it felt like a dream, like it shouldn't be possible. It was an amazing experience, I was shouting at my friend, "dude, they did it, it is happening!" I loved the movie!!!
I was thinking, Norman doesn't die, Harry doesn't become vengeful, Doc Oc doesn't die, Peter never shows his face to MJ. In Andrew's world, Gwen's dad is alive now, so Gwen and Peter never broke up. Things have changed for those two spidermen!
The movie made me think about the shows 12 Monkeys and DARK!. Some fucked up things could have happened in their universes because they messed with causality!!!
I never really thought about it that way. I mean, Andrew and Tobey still go through the same things, but there's a timeline where the villains live.
Also Peter had no idea that any of them would Die, until they talked about it in the Santorum, and they immediately start to think of something else. The only thing May does is that she convinces him to cure them. Basically just giving him a goal. Spider-man from the onset didn't want them to die. So no, he wasn't blindly following Stranges' orders regardless of fate
I like how Andrew Garfield Spiderman landed with his body instead of using his webs, you can tell that Andrews Spiderman must've replayed that exact situation hundreds of times.
Cause the thing that killed Gwen was the sudden stop, when he saved MJ he prevented that.
Honestly, Peter's decision to jump directly to Dr. Strange didn't feel weird to me, but I was thinking of him as someone who's last several years have been spent interacting with and relying on people like Iron Man, Captain America and Dr. Strange. He helped save the freaking world from a Thanos from a different timeline after not existing for 5 years. Hell, his last movie involved him being railroaded by "Fury" into helping with what they though was an inter dimensional threat. Even his daily life as Peter involves using a ridiculously high tech suit made out of nanites along with his literal super powers. In light of all that, for him to immediately resort to asking an Avenger to make everyone forget that he's Spider-Man makes total sense.
I'll admit Dr. Strange felt a bit out of character, but not that much. In his defense, he only agreed to help Peter after he told him that it was effecting innocent people's lives, not just his own. I'm also pretty sure they were trying to hit home that while Strange has grown a lot he's never really gotten over that innate recklessness that caused him to get into that car crash in the first place. He still the same guy who fiddled with time the moment he had the opportunity and as this movie points out this isn't the first time he's used this spell and for far more frivolous things. I imagine this behavior is going to be the highlight of Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness.
i disagree with the statement that peter wouldn’t instantly go to dr strange because i think a LOT of people including me would forget you can just plead if we were in the same situation as him
I feel like in civil war when Tony asked Peter why he does what he does and Pete answered “because if you can do the things I can and you don’t, and bad things happen, then that’s on you” was him telling us about Uncle Ben.
"The brilliant Spider Man Lotus"
Yikes. Didn't age well.
Fun fact. The character who originally tells Peter “with great power comes great responsibility” in the comics was aunt may. In fact it wasn’t even worded like that. Far from home is actually comic accurate for that
You’re completely wrong. The comics had Peter saying the line in at the end when he lets Ben’s killer go and he walks off into the night.
Norman was never a victim of the Goblin, the Goblin was him, it was his hubris and violent tendencies externalized
I completely disagree with your take on Dr Strange and the Thanos situation, he wasn’t basing it off of feelings, he saw one reality where they could win and that was a fact, just like how in no way home he was willing to sacrifice the villains for the greater good, in end game he was willing to sacrifice Tony for the greater good, he knew Tony would die, defeating thanos was apart of his mission to keep their reality safe and sacrificing the villains in no way home was another mission of keeping their reality safe
I don’t think it’s unnatural at all that Strange is callous about the fates of villains from other universes. It especially isn’t contradictory of Infinity War, where he had stakes, both for his person and his universe, in the outcome, no matter how slim his chances.
Think of the sheer vastness of the multiverse. It’s hard enough to have care for people you don’t know in your own world, but to risk destabilizing the multiverse and compromising your own world, just to give these villains a second chance at life in their other realities requires a pretty crazy level of compassion.
I know. There are trillions of lives at stake. It’s hard to sacrifice the entire multiverse for 5 people…especially criminals. It’s not like Strange didn’t care but the entire multiverse was at stake.
@@christianrapper fr and not to mention these villains are literally terrible people.
Tobey may have been the spiderman I first grew up with Andrew was the spiderman I hold closest to my heart. The voice I hear when I read the comics, the spiderman that feels most like me and to see him deliver this heartfelt and different performance to the other two spider men. If this film doesn't show to people that the tasm films weren't bad bc of Andrew I don't know what will. The only thing I really hate about this film is right before or after the mid credits scene when it says the producers want to commemorate avi arad who without his vision this would have happened. Just fuck off. He's the one that nearly crippled spiderman 3 and is the reason for the hate towards the webb duolagy. If anyone should be credited it should be Stan Lee or Steve Ditko. Or the writers and directors of previous films who were the ones who brought the film to life
This movie makes me appreciate the other two even more, I love how the twist was this was MCUs take on Peters origin story or more Spider Man’s origin story, he wasn’t fully spider man previously until this movies ending. It’s so interesting and I love it honestly, especially the true to character writing Toby and Andrew were given, corny lines by Toby and Andrews amazing banter and his redemption were absolutely flawless.
I disagree on your take on past MCU Spider-Man but good video regardless
Cheers dude thank you!
One thing that I started to think about was that when petter went to talk to that college lady she kinda accepted and, said that she would give them a second chance, so maybe if he went directly to her in the first place instead going to Dr. Strange maybe everything would work out perfectly, or maybe not because the lady was impressed because he saved her from Dr. Octavious
Yeah I personally view it as she wouldn’t have accepted them all if Peter didn’t save her life. The way she said “you’re a hero!” after being saved leads me to believe she was more viewing him as a menace/villain beforehand
That's exactly what Dr. Strange got mad at him for after the spell got messed up.
he liereally just didn't think of it. He didn't know that was a thing.
@@tulip5210 that doesn't mean she would've accepted otherwise.
Well even if they got in knowing Peter Parker a.k.a Spiderman would continue to negatively impact their life. We saw him get paint thrown at him, a brick thrown through his window, recorded and ridiculed at school, and fail to get into any college because he is Spiderman. Similar shit happened to his loved ones which was the biggest issue for him.
8:11 I would say that his whole personal private life was basically destroyed by the identity reveal and the MIT rejection would have been the last straw making him so desperate to get Dr Strange to fix it.
I mean the comics Peter Parker did a deal with Mephisto to make the world forget he was Spider-Man after Aunt May got shot because of him unmasking to the world and sold his marriage with Mary Jane to Mephisto for the identity fixing. Also, considering the Raimi and Webb Spider-Men let a robber kill uncle Ben by accident just before university, makes sense that MCU’s asking for a mind wipe spell led to Aunt May’s death.
1. It’s not messy or overly reliant on nostalgia or fan service as it earns it an it serves the story not just there for a reference.
2. Andrew Garfield is a good Peter Parker/spiderman, idk who I’d say is the best though.
Tobey's Spider-Man is the one with heart. He used emotions to overcome Doc's arms, Sandman, and Harry Osborn, making them into allies in the end.
Tom's Spider-Man is the one with smarts. He beat Doctor Strange, fixed Doc's arms, and came up with a solution to everything in the end.
Andrew's Spider-Man is just a cool dude with some serious issues.
I can't really compare them, each of their universes were just built different.
They’re all fantastic in their own way. You can’t really say who’s the best.
Yeah you can, and it doesn’t matter because Andrew stole the show
I think it actually is pretty messy. Some scenes work only if you have nostalgia. For example scene when other Spideys console Tom's Peter Parker works only if you saw and loved other movies. Otherwise, you realise these two guys are total strangers to Tom's Peter that just happen to have the same name as him - he literally has no idea who they are, if they are even good people, so at a point of great grief his words of sympathy should not count for much. They count for something only because WE know Toby and Andrew's incarnation of Spider-men.
Or the fact that Dr Strange casts world-altering spells because 3 people did not get to university is as stupid as Thanos' plan for fixing the universe. I mean if Kingpin or some other mafia was after Peter's friends, one could buy it. As it is, is more like "just don't you dare think about it - quick! quick! - here are some pretty explosions, isn't that nice?." Come on!
@@mreszotnik I think if alternate old versions of me appeared I would care what they they have to say. Especially knowing they ended up doing the same stuff I do. Especially at a point where I was questioning if I should keep on. That bridge is definitely fair to cross automatically, even if they're not true future selves they have the most relation to Peter that anyone could when it comes to making choices in life.
As for the Doctor Strange stuff, I think he probably has the same reasons as Tony Stark to help him and give him dangerous tools/favors. He knows he literally was complicit in putting a teenager into a battlefield (especially the end of Endgame). Necessary but not necessarily good, even in war times we don't usually send high schoolers to battlefields. Stark and Strange both had relatively safe childhoods, and got to choose their powers to help people later in life, while Peter is just a literal kid who accidentally got powers and felt obligated to help people with them. So seeing Tony give him a favor of a mechanical murder suit (not to mention those glasses) wasn't out of character, and for the same reasons Stephen gave him a favor to try fixing his life after being a hero made it a mess.
In both cases these men were being generous, but arrogant--providing the solution they would have used for themselves, not necessarily the solution that was right for Spider-Man. And in the end Peter made the choice to become forgotten by both of them (or I should say Tony's estate manager and/or Happy forgot him). He decided to drop the magic and tech access, to do his thing, the Spider-Man way, which is what really made it a coming-of-age story.
I appreciate the effort put into this video but I respectfully disagree with just about everything. I thought that this was one of the best ways to do fan service and that they actually play into the movie as opposed to being jarring. But I of course have to re watch a few times and maybe my opinion will change
_one of the best ways to do fan service_
it's the worst example i've ever seen. Character, story and theme are laid waste for cheap thrills that make no sense.
it's exactly the film Scorsese warned us about: *It's an amusement park ride - instead of cinema.*
@@summertyme5748 okay. I respect your opinion and I can maybe see where you're coming from but I just don't see it that way. As a spider-man fan I enjoyed the movie and the fan service.
@@summertyme5748 A character saying one line doesn't have to change the entire course of the story, and a character doing something that is a nostalgic memory to those before isn't bad either, let there be fan service here and there, let people laugh. Let spider-man fans be spider-man fans and enjoy it.
@@summertyme5748 I thought you were an MCU fan and not someone who would actually take Scorsese's words seriously.
@@summertyme5748 okay except the characters that come in (specifically osborn, toby, and andrew) directly help to develop toms character… they weren’t there for nothing, they specifically taught him lessons about guilt, revenge, and responsibility.
An interesting take, but i wholeheartedly disagree with the fan service compliants. I personally think, each scene after the spell going wrong was thought out well
Your main complaint was Tom Hollands spiderman was a different spiderman with a different origin story than the other two? Thats kinda the whole point guy. This is a spiderman who got his start from Tony stark instead uncle Ben. He comes to be spiderman in a universe where superheros are already a thing unlike the first 2 spidermans where Peter Parker doesn't have superheros to work with. This trilogy gives us an alternate story of how spiderman becomes a superhero and what kind of superhero he becomes. Youre complaining that he isn't exactly like the other two franchises. Tom Holland will be in a second trilogy starting after the events of no way home, with the death of May instead of Ben but with the same message of "with great power, there must also be great responsibility". And fan service can be an amazing thing, this whole movie was fan service done right, unlike fan service in other properties. Ie davos saying "I thought you'd still be rowing" in game of thrones season 7.
This movie is a great ending for a great trilogy about a spiderman who's an alternate version from every other spiderman we've seen before, and it gives us a new version of his origin with the same message but in a different way.
I have to disagree on how you think Strange was acting out of character by wanting to send the villains back to die. The basis of your argument is that you believe that Strange didn't know the steps that needed to be taken in the 1 possible outcome to defeat Thanos, and thus you frame it as him believing in a miracle and not science and facts. However, there's evidence to suggest in Endgame that he did know the specifics of that outcome and Tony did in fact needed to die for Thanos to loose.
In a deleted scene for Endgame, the heroes meet up during the final battle to hatch a plan. And when Tony confronts Strange about the prediction he made 5 years ago, Strange responds: "If I told you, it wouldn't happen" so he *knew* about the specific steps that needed to happen for this outcome, he just stayed quiet about it to everyone otherwise things wouldn't have played out that way. Tony didn't need to know about his death in order to keep the timeline intact. See for yourself: ua-cam.com/video/hkm0uwRHko4/v-deo.html
To ad to this, in the final movie, as Strange is holding back the water that is going to flood the battlefield, he looks at Tony and lifts one finger at him, signaling the one outcome that needs to happen for them to win, Tony's sacrifice. It wasn't a miracle, it was a calculated plan by Strange from the start, which is consistent with his characterization in No Way Home to sacrifice the live's of a handful of villains to save the life of trillions.
I think when it comes to critiquing the mcu spider-man, we shouldn't compare it to the other franchises because the mcu Spiderman movies are achieving something different to the other iteration. The Raimi and Webb movies are stand alone films while The Watts movies are tie-ins to an ongoing saga. I think what they did with Tom Hollands spidey while not being my favourite interoperation of the character, is perfect for the MCU. If you are going to put Peter in a bigger universe, he will benefit from that. Yes I can agree that sacrifices some of the core aspects to his character but to me thats not a bad thing at all. I think while I can agree the mcu Spiderman movies aren't impressive in terms of style and personality but they are great MCU movies. The last time I watched the mcu Spiderman movies, I looked at them more as MCU movies instead of just movies and I liked them a lot better in that perspective. They may not stand out as spider-man movies because they are mcu movies. But I think its completely subjective if you think thats a bad thing or a good thing. I just like the mcu spider-man because of how well it acts as a puzzle piece in a larger puzzle and the unique stories that can come out of that, that we haven't seen before.
Exactly this is what i need thank you
Spiderman movies they gonna be compared.
Ikr, some people are just too exigeant, they expect too much...
Mcu literally just put the previous Spiderman's and villains in their movie. So it is definitely fair to compare them.
@@jackwilson5152 yeah but can you just enjoy them? Just enjoy them
Why are you mad they killed off May? That is literally the most Spider-Man thing they could have done.
Jesus dude, uncle Ben just had like two lines in the comics and none of them was "with great power and responsibility", that's something Peter figured it out by himself after he died, just because Raimi popularized that myth doesn't mean marvel is forced to adapt it the same way
Remember Oscorp was doing research on nanotech, and Ock's arms were made by them, so...they should have used nanotech to make the chip that let's him control them
Him being afraid of even mentioning Ben says more than anything else they could do about how much trauma that caused him. That's the subtext of her saying the line. Ben obviously said that to him in this universe and her repeating it before she passes hit him all the more harder that he didn't learn from Ben and fucked up again. So much goes unsaid but is obvious
I love this interpretation so much
This is so fucking beautiful man. Movie slaps idgaf it deserves all the praise it’s getting
holy shit i didn't realize that. awesome catch
This is a reach and a half man. There’s nothing “obviously” implied about ANYTHING in regards to Tom’s version having any sort of relationship with Ben. Aunt may is simply meant to serve ben’s role in this version of Spider-Man, which is fine, it works for the sake of this Peter, we don’t need to create our own head canon here going off absolutely nothing in terms of a Ben existing and previously bestowing the wisdom upon Peter. For all we know Ben Parker was never in this peter’s life. Aunt may is suggested to just be the single aunt. Never mentions having gone through a divorce, or having lost a husband, literally the only time ben is ever even referenced somewhat is Peter’s luggage in far from home having the initials BP on them. And when the luggage is destroyed in the drone strikes, aunt may makes a joke about it and there’s no mention of it having any type of sentimental importance.
but do we even know ben existed in toms world? He might not of, it could of just been aunt may.
That Spider-Man Lotus line aged like milk lmao.
Dude the way you explained how the two older spider men had to appear in tom’s life to teach him how to truly be spiderman and that it was a lesson of empathy and moving forward has never been more genuine and true. That was exactly my take on this film and i cant stop crying.
Honestly, what is it with all you creators just hating on the film? Just enjoy it and have some fun ffs
I agree, the film es divided in two differentiated half’s:
Number 1: Peter dealing with the Mysterio aftermath (this is literally solved off screen during the Daredevil cameo).
Number 2: The villains arrivals, this is definitely the best part of the movie.
Anyways, I liked how in order to keep organically both half’s, the movie’s main theme was “learning how to get second chances”, you see how Peter struggled with the decisions he made at the end of the previous movie and how he was willing to fix everything, the villains also share this main theme since all 5 were people with bad luck (Electro was in a accident, Flint wanted to save his daughter, Otto lost his dream project, Curt Connors was a victim of his own experiment and Norman had a split personality, none of them were actually guilty), so in that way if Peter can have a second chance then why the 5 villains don’t? That’s something Spider-Man would do in essence and that’s why the ending hits emotionally: cause it’s Peter learning every second chances have consequences and the best thing to do is live going frontwards.
The problems aren’t even solved by Matt, the government might not be judging him as likely but the public and everyone else is still either super hating him or believing him, and this especially comes into play during the May scene, where due to the police and and JJ things get worse.
What I love about the introduction of the Multiverse is that it makes me feels an extra layer of feeling to all the pre- MCU Marvel films I watched as a child. Because now Marvel can take anything from any previous film and say it’s canon. Because it does matter.
I really disagree with the opening statement. From the very beginning, Tom’s Peter/Spider Man brought the very essence of the character that the others never had. As a character that exists in the MCU, it needed to be different and now, those who didn’t like it will also have what they want so, Tom is still the best version of the character now and in the future. 🎉
Wrong
The difference between Thanos and Dr strange was Thanos was trying to fulfill HIS future, Dr strange was trying to fulfill THE future.
Everyone is calling this guy a contrarian because he pointed out the aspects of the movie that he did not enjoy. He even stated that this is, in his opinion, the best MCU Spider-man film.
Voicing your opinion for a hype movie should be illegal at this point.
It’s just really sad because I feel if people would watch through the entirety of the video, they’d see that they mostly agree with me. I love all the emotional payoff and we’ll executed fan service in the back half of the film! I think it’s a good movie. Idk, I feel like there’s no nuance in film discourse anymore. You can’t say you think a beloved is good or fine, or a hated film is great. I’m just a guy who’s passionate about talking about film and make videos on it. I’m not trying to take anyone’s enjoyment of the film away or be a contrarian for the sake of recognition. Who would want to do that? I’m never anything but honest with my audience and I wish people could see that. It’s really disheartening to be mischaracterized and misinterpreted in bad faith…
I hate that they made Otto as a joke and made him too cartoonish in the first half instead of having him be the scientist who tries to analyze the situation cause he doesn’t know where he is
Doc uses nano tech for his arms, hence why peters suit is compatible with the arms, it's even said in the second film of the rami trilogy
Since each section of the film takes slightly different directions regarding motivations and plot, some propels can overlook those flaws and some don’t like yourself. While I agree with most of your takes, I mostly enjoyed this one without the flaws holding me down. Also don’t mind that they “avoided Uncle Ben like the plague.” If they keep coming back to him as this cornerstone, to me it kinda deifies the importance of the “Uncle” and makes him this Messiah to the Spider-Man ethos, kinda like how Amazing Spider-Man 2 makes Peters DNA the key to the bite making him a chosen one. BTW still love Andrew’s as my fave Spidey. Still keep it up!
Hey man all fair points! Thanks for watching and the kind words man 👊🏻❤️
@@FilmSpeak No Worries! Also interested to eventually hear your thoughts on Civil War’s ideologies. Perhaps when Cap 4 eventually comes around?
At this point, I'm glad uncle Ben doesnt exist in the MCU.
Him suddenly name dropped in this movie would have been yet another example of cheap fan service.
May is this universe's Ben, and that's ok
@@Jose-se9pu I think while Ben was referenced in What If...? (alternate universe within the MCU canon), he was indirectly mentioned in past films.
Examples such as May wearing a ring in Civil War around her neck, Peter not wanting Ned to tell her Aunt May with "... everything that's happened with her..." and the BFP suitcase in far From Home.
Unless the animated Peter Parker show and future Spider-Man films touch on it, im fine with what we've got with Aunt may!
Fan-service is a term that is used to describe an act of generosity, compassion even ambition in works of fiction. On the other hand it is also perceived as unwarranted content for the sympathetic fandom.
No way home is a fan-servicing virtue of a film. What’s most surprising is the delicacy and focus on theme, character and narrative.
Granted the film deals with a multi-dimensional crisis (pun intended) of epic proportions however the film transcends emotional barriers by telling a thoughtful, inspiring and poignant story.
One that is heartfelt yet audacious, extravagant, yet sincere.
For fans and dabblers alike, satisfaction is a certainty as the film delivers the perfect gift of surprises, spectacle and most importantly soul. Is the film perfect? technically no, but depending on your expectations it may just be the ultimate Spider-Man film.
A true tear-jerker, a definite crowd-pleaser, an instant classic.
Stan Lee would be proud to know that with this film, his legacy is complete. His ingenious creation about a friendly neighbourhood hero has now subverted the language of cinema.
9.5/10
absolutely the worst aged spider man lotus take
I like how everything leading up to now was just his origin story
It's not supposed to take 3 movies to do that tho. It should only take one lol. MCU Trilogy was a failure. No way home proved that by bringing in classic spiderman actors to try and redeem it. sad but true. Trilogy could've been so much more
For me, one of the big highlights was J. Jonah Jameson being this Bill O'Reilly-esque online pundit. I haven't seen that mentioned by too many people.
I really enjoyed the Miles Morales reference, and I do see it as foreshadowing an inevitable appearance.
Andrew seemed really haunted here, and I think that he got redemption by saving MJ was really classy. But I wonder how much of his real-life feelings were channeled here. Everyone knows he didn't get a fair shake.
Would like to see Feigi tap Gerard Way to work on the MCU, as he contributed to the Spiderverse graphic novel and has done wonders as the creator of Umbrella Academy.
Excellent essay dude. Thanks for putting into words my feelings exactly after watching NWH for the first time. Months after the hype finally died down. I appreciate that you called out some of the errors, sloppiness and plot holes in the first half of the movie. A lot of people are glossing over those. I think your review was fair, balanced and ultimately optimistic. Great job. 👍🏼
I wasn't really a big fan of the 1st 2 Tom Holland Spider Man films, but they righted the ship with No Way Home.
What I'm really hoping for is that the 4th film picks up where this left off with classic red & blue Spider Man, no Stark Tech, Peter struggling to get by, being the loner / outsider with a closely guarded secret identity like in the comics.
Also no aliens / magic / multiverse, more of a down to earth crime story, introduce Black Cat as the "villain" & Spider Man's love interest. Don't immediately throw Venom / Carnage into the mix.
People are being really hateful in this comments section. I think you made a lot of valid points, especially with the fan service. My personal opinion is I can overlook fan service because I’m just so happy to see these characters, but I can get that it is often empty fan service. Sorry you have to deal with all these toxic fans in the comments.
Same!!!! They need to rethink the flaw of the film
Are people being hateful? I’m seeing a lot of disagreement but not really anyone being overly mean or anything.
Honestly this is a pretty tame comment section
To think that a senior in high school wouldnt be irrational and immature is hilarious
I feel like aunt mays death made perfect sense from a cause and effect standpoint, because now it makes sense for everyone to forget about Peter, rather than the film having to explain complications with the person who owns where he lives forgetting that he exists
But the lack of characterization and emotional moments she had in the entire trilogy for them to kill her off just made her death seem weak. Don't think nobody really cared or felt anything when she died because she's been portrayed as a joke for the entire trilogy.
I honestly don’t care if it’s a mess. I don’t care that the first half was dumb as that wasn’t what it was to me. I could not give two sh!ts at all. This is my favorite Marvel movie of all time, period. #TASM3
The thing about fan service is that I can't help but thinking it wasn't sincere. They didn't do their homework, they just searched some memes on Reddit. They basically ignored the fact that the first movie ended with "Peter... don't tell Harry" by having Ock knowing about Osborn being Goblin for exposition's sake (making looking Harry like a fool for being the only one to not know about his father being Goblin until the end of Spider-Man 2), they ignored the fact that Octavious was a great friend of Curt Connors' and having him to cure Lizard at the end would've been much more powerful and they could've built a small tiny mini-arc between Raimi's Ock and Webb's Lizard where the "good Ock" would've tried to tell him about his Connors to remind Webb's Connors about his humanity, Tobey could've told Tom about Flint Marko being his uncle's killer and how he gave him a second chance at the end of Spider-Man 3 (to mirror Tom's situation with Goblin), the fact that Tobey said that his best friend died after he tried to kill him was just disrespectful to Harry's redemption and the fact that he never mentions that Spider-Man 3's final battle was the first and only time he fought in a team gives him no emotional stake in NWH's final battle (unlike Andrew when he saves MJ), there should've been a scene where Andrew magnetizes his webshooters to take on Electro just like Gwen taught him to (and maybe a scene where he tries to give the advice to the other two and THAT's the moment when they find out about Tobey's organic webs), there should've been a fucking interaction between Tobey and Willem, especially one where Tobey mentions Harry to make Norman come back by telling him that Harry followed his father's footsteps and died and THAT should've been how they turned Green Goblin back to Norman Osborn, not with a fucking antidote, storytelling and character moments that actually evolve those characters instead of dumb plot devices, especially when you think that Tom needed Stark tech to cure Ock, while Tobey simply used his words. And that scene could've been foreshadowed by Tobey and Andrew talking about Harry and mentioning the fact that Harry became the Green Goblin in both of their worlds, with Andrew mentioning him killing Gwen and Tobey mentioning his redemption to also give another input to Andrew's Spidey to come out of his bitter, angry Spider-Man days.
Fan service isn't inherently a bad thing. Fan service is a great chance for the audience and the filmmakers to geek about something together, reminding us that we're all fans. When fan service isn't genuine, but just a mean to distract me from the filmmakers shortcomings... that's when I get angry. And this movie made me both happy and angry at the same time. You could say that it's pretty good and I'd agree, you could say that it's fucking garbage and I'd agree.
Been saying this for a long time! ever since I saw the trailer for no way home. Having classic spiderman actors appear felt so cheap. It's blatant, it's insincere, it's bullshit. I dismissed the movie as a whole
I honestly believe Matt Murdock Volunteered to be in the case. A street level superhero with a secret identity protecting a sorta street level superhero whose secret identity got revealed isn't that far fetched when you think about it. And the reason for a single cameo is probably because daredevil is among the best superhero shows out there and yet a lot of folks haven't watched it because it's non cannon to MCU. I believe the reason for this appearance is marvel saying to the fans of the show "we hear you".
Again. It's a personal opinion.
Its canon wdym
Can’t lie watching this made me tear up just thinking about how impactful the impactful parts of the movie were they really hit when they were supposed to which I think really tied the movie up well even tho it was scrambled
Someone didnt read one more day 😂yall love analyzing the mcu without analyzing the source material
32:37 I’m pretty sure the Scooby Doo gag was a reference to the show “13 Ghosts of Scooby Doo” where the gang had to capture 13 ghosts. Similar to how Peter Parker and his friends are trying to rally up all the villains from other dimensions.
I never teared up, while watching a movie, this movie changed that. I cried multiple times, they did such a good job on this movie. This movie means so much to me as a Spider-Man fan.
Man sounds like he was expecting a daredevil character arc lol. For the casual viewer, cool they got a lawyer. For us nerds, omg we got Charlie back. The scene served its purpose and I don’t see how they could’ve done anything extra without it being filler.
Man, your take of Andrew Garfield’s take on working towards balance made me emotional. I’ve seen every Spider-Man in theatres since I was a kid, and I think Andrew always gave it everything and I wanted more for his story.
Disagreed on a lot of your take, but I like that a different perspective can be seen.
what i love the most about your video essay, is that i find your input always fascinating even if i disagree sometimes, your points always come across. i love seeing the other side of things and you do that wonderfully.
Honestly, thank you so much. That kind of response means so much. I'm glad that even if we disagree, we're intrigued to see the other side.
Same!
Well I'm going to be quoting "a pretty powerful, attractive black man" for the rest of the week
Dude this video need to blow up....
Such a beautiful video essay ❤️