I don't do any giveaways on Telegram - please be careful of anyone trying to impersonate me! Also, thanks for all the support on this - the video has reached way beyond what I expected!! it'll take some time to get through all the comments 🙏🏻
my dad just gave me a canon eos 20d with about 7,000 $ worth of tripods and lenses while visiting him. As well as a bunch of outdated stuff I dont need at all like cf card readers the size of my first dvd player lol. I was sweating the age of the camera because I kept hearing its liek an ancient dino when i started researching. But then I saw some of the pictures hanging in my dad house, awesome action shots of flying eagles, a hawk landing, up close action of my uncle doing a wheelie on his racing bike. I just thought, man if he could take these as a side hobby photographer using the 20d back then, then I can do the same thing now, regardless of how many newer cameras there are. This camera did it, and it still can. It was sobering to stop nd realize that. I immediately slid a rack of lithiums in there and started shooting. 1,500 images later, and 1,740 approx miles of road trip later, Im so happy I didnt just pack it away with dreams of "figuring out a newer camera for the lenses at some point" Crazy though, as soon as I got home and thought about it, sitting here at my desk figuring out how to run the canon printer he gave me on my linux systems, I randomly found this video.
As a 91 year old and still a serious amateur photographer, and a mechanical engineer who worked in the image making industry, (taking photos since I was 13), I agree with your observations and conclusions. If I could, I would send you photos taken by me 78 years ago with a Kodak 120 Autographic Special folding camera that I am proud of today.
As a 51 year old who got into photography when I was 19 years old, I can say I’m glad film was still the thing when I got into photography. It’s crazy how the old stuff is coming back. Well at least the film look is popular now.
We are living in an age of consumerism and the social media algorithms are designed to make us think our desires are our needs. One of the most honest videos I have watched on UA-cam. You just got yourself a dedicated subscriber.
So you're saying other photographers and videographers like Matt Johnson, Jared Polin, Gerald Undone, Julia trotti, Dan Watson, Petal Pixel, Potato Jet, Jason Vong, and many other media people who have been in the game for 5+ years are just lying to their audience? Lying to them to get them to buy new cameras and new gears so they can make money off of them? You're just as ignorant as Rick Bebblington is. Sony's cameras are made by us and for us. We tell them what we would like to see in the next model and what they need to fix. Sony listens to their fans and the people because they want to deliver quality cameras and lenses. A7ii to A7iii was a huge jump as it feature a bigger battery, faster autofocus, more autofocus points, picture profiles, 4K video resolution, etc. It isn't consumerism to tell you to buy a new camera. It's because the a7iii improved on the a7ii in every freaking way that its worth the upgrade. A7iv is exactly the same thing. Sony added 10-bit colors along with its amazing video autofocus thus making it the perfect hybrid camera. If you don't need it or dont care for it, then don't buy it. None of those youtubers i listed tells you to go out and buy it. They review the cameras, give their honest opinions on it, tell you who the cameras are for, and most of all, they know what the heck they're talking about. I bought an a7iv after my a7iii because i wanted 10-bit colors, S-cinetone, video auto tracking and so much more. Do you know how much an a7iv would have cost back in 2015? $5,000 usd easily because of what it can do. It's like you saying Godox doesn't need to produce their AD600 with HSS. Rode doesn't need to produce Wireless Go. And DJI doesn't need to produce the mini Pro 3. And It's always the ignorant people who does not do their research that thinks new gears and cameras are just consumerism.
I agree 100% . Shooting raw and learning post processing will make a bigger difference in how your photos look. Getting out and shooting a lot will make you a better photographer.
OMG.... it's about time somebody opened up their mouth and stated the obvious. All these UA-cam channels trying to tell us to buy the latest gear, reviewing this new camera and this new lens. Thank you sir for this video. It was long overdue!
Listen, as soon as a new camera, car, TV, phone, color or whatever comes out, the one we have is instantly inferior or “not good enough.” How can we enjoy what we have knowing there’s a newer one out there? We are strongly compelled to think this way. When do we put the brakes on our personal consuming, when we run out of money? After all, there’s a newer version of everything in our lives.
I've been a professional photographer for 58 years now, and the newest camera I own is 10-12 years old. You "want better pictures"? Keep your camera and make 100 images DAILY. THEN you'll know how to USE your camera properly. The late great Ansel Adams used a 105 year-old POOR QUALITY lens ( a Goertz Convertible Anastigmat ) for at least 50 of his MOST FAMOUS images, on an obsolete format (film size) European view camera, he had to trim-down 4x5 film for. He knew HOW to use what he HAD beyond question. All a lens and camera do is RECORD light and shadows. Learn HOW to use light and what makes an interesting image. "The Command to LOOK" is a classic out-of-print book on composition. Classic painters knew what made people look good. Read-up on them. During the Covid scare, I told a hundred or more beginning photographers to take a soup can, set it on a table in a dark room and use ONE BARE continuous light on a stand and MOVE the light around to SEE the effect on an electronic image. Every single one that tried it became MUCH better photographers. I'm NOT really a portrait photographer, but I've made hundreds of portraits with ONE LIGHT, many that I sold for 5 figures.
10-12 years that's when digital technology ripes and start to hit the point of dimminished returns. Sony's A7R2 was released 10 yrs ago. Who need more than that? For anyone who is an amateurs that don't shoot "gig" or work for "client", I'd add to use the money for plane tickets. Wonderful places are garantees for wonderful photos -- given you already know how to use your camera properly. That's all you need.
So true. Once the camera becomes a fully integrated extension of the human eye ones art gets interesting. Gear is important but experience so much more.
I couldn't have put it better myself . I use a richo kr-10 super for film I bought 40 years ago and for digital photography, I use a pentax k-5 which is 14 years old. The Camera isn't that important - it's how we interpret light as you pointed out.
Blowing thousands on the newest tech is waste of money. There are paid photographers that still shoot on dslrs and movies/commercials being recorded on older cinema cameras with older lenses.
The vast majority. And they are working and published not on you tube. All good as they are tools. The newest can be a headache by lacking compatibility and robust construction. Output rules.
Any photographer that eventually goes through this "trap" knows what he is talking about and confirm. I started photography 6 years ago, and I took a loan to buy the most expensive camera and lightning equipment doing projects and hoping it would bring me forward as an artist. I was worried they would break as they were my tools and I needed them to produce. Many years later I`ve now sold most of it and went back to one of my first cameras. I have a few good lenses that are considered "old" and I can bring them out even on a rainy day without worrying. Thanks for an amazing video I hope it can help many people ☺
Same. I just sold my mirrorless setup and bought an old full frame DLSR and 50mm. TBH I prefer the look of the D700 series sensors over the new mirrorless stuff. The color just looks nicer. All cameras are so good these days it’s more of a style preference if anything.
It's funny how camera companies make you think you need certain features. There's a fine line between what you're allowed to do and what you can do. In terms of strict photography, modern cameras have only had minor improvements; most still features are just "quality of life" upgrades rather than actual "game changers." Videos are a bit different, but honestly, how many of us are shooting professional videos rather than just using our phones? Since most of these features are more about convenience, it ultimately comes down to question whether I can afford a luxurious lifestyle.
Isn't that funny just how accurate timing can be sometimes? This video popped up just when I needed it - THANK YOU! And now you have +1 follower as well.
After hesitating because of the cost, I upgraded from a full frame DSLR to mirrorless this summer and wished I had done it several years ago. The improvement in autofocus alone was worth it because with eye AF I'm getting far fewer rejects that were a bit soft or missed focus altogether, and am spending less time trying to nail focus. I also see improvements in detail in portraits and better colour rendition. Another big improvement is night photography. The last few times I've gone out to do urban scenes I left the tripod at home and I don't miss it. I'm getting away with ISO 2000 where I would never attempt it before. I'm glad I didn't see this video when I was looking for a new camera!
yeah I recently sold my Nikon d610. as much as I loved that camera for landscape photography, it was a pain in the ass trying to nail focus on low light situations for street photography. I'd often miss shots or they'd be out of focus when attempting to shoot moving subjecta. Furthermore, having to lug a heavy DSLR around can often put you off taking out to shoot photos. I'm now in the market for a mirrorless camera. maybe something like the Fuji XT-5.
Yeah going to a z6ii from a D90 was revelatory. I have done my best work. I don't think going to a z9 would improve much. Nor would an 85 1.2. but the kit that I have assembled has pushed me and my capabilities for sure.
I definitely agree upgrading from dslr to mirrorless is a no brainer, I’ll even say upgrading my Eos R to a R5C was a definite upgrade in work flow. As a photographer/videographer The upgrade was appropriate and had paid itself off!!!
‘it’s all about investment into the creative process, not investment into the gear you use for that creative process.’ so much more valuable. well said my friend.
I couldn't agree more! Grew up in the 60s last century with fully manual film cameras. No AF, no automatic programs, even no light metering. You had to learn the whole stuff the hard way and I am glad to have made this experience!
You are gonna make me cry!! The good old days. With all the high tech cameras we have today, my all time favorite was/is my beloved, manual everything Pentax MX!
I totally agree with you, that's why I am asking you and other UA-camrs to focus more on the storytelling. Show up examples of pitches to clients, treatments, putting ideas on paper, shot selections etc. The story is where the real art is.
This is the most honest and truthful explanation of buying a camera I’ve seen from anyone on UA-cam. Because, sir, you are speaking straight truth. Glad I found your channel! Thanks!
1st SLR I owned was a Pentax K1000, with which I learned not just how to take pictures, but also how to develop them in a darkroom. I love how practical digital photography is, but there is nothing more magic than seeing your image emerge in a little plastic tray of chemicals.
+1. I second that, shooting since the 80's with Film, and i love it. No display onto the backside, no broken aesthetics, no fumbling onto your gear, because you're in search, dire need of feature xyz, into the decisive moment. Digital nowadays since some couple years is boring for my needs, i do shoot (seldom) digital, just to save film cost. I do even shoot less 35mm Film nowadays, because of the cost. But with film, even you never have 36-40 frames as keepers, it always gives me a smile, after cocking, hitting the shutter. Never the same kind of (slow) approach & feeling, with digital. With film, you think perhaps 5-12 times, before the shutter release - and whileas digital was never meant to be spray & pray, or run & gun, by design, i do think less, when shooting digital. It's not a haptic medium, it's not the same, not the same kind of slow approach, and everything else. Into contrast to (35mm) film - it's of course better, but not always...and doesn't feel "right" into the same way, as film. And for large format photography, there's simply no alternative with digital. These guys are really do *know* what they're doing. 1st 35mm SLR - Pentax MX, SMC-A 50/1.7...the nifty-fifty never felt right...for my eyes. Then switch over to another system hence bajonet and brand, and was never been happier. 2nd System Minolta, still like my XD7 way much, with a 35/2.8 MD mostly.
First camera I owned was the same camera. Pentax K1000. when I was stationed in Germany. The gym complex also had a dark room where I learned to develop my film. Wow memories come flooding back..
Spot on! In 40 years of photography, I've only bought two cameras new. One was a Hasselblad in the late 70s, and a new Canon 5D MK IV (and I have 3 other used MK IV bodies used). I still shoot film cameras that are up to 100+ years old. The best part is that I can use 'vintage' DKL mount lenses from the 1950s and adapt earlier lenses to digital cameras. Megapixels are, for the most part, a marketing ploy. Mirrorless is also a marketing ploy for 99% of what anyone needs. Also, new technology is prone to "Infant mortality" in comparison to older, tried and true DSLRs. Buy used, buy only what you need for what you do.
Thank you. As someone who’s dusted off my Rebel 300d. As a hobbyist. I’m not convinced that a mirror less Camera is going to make me better. I’m imagining that as the video suggests. Getting out and taking photos can make you better.
Have you ever used a mirrorless camera for any length of time? Have you ever shot sport with a Hasselblad for any length of time? How often do you use your 100+ cameras (if you can still find film for it and remembering we are in 2023). ;o) On the other hand I totally agree with your last statement.
@BrunoChalifour yeah, I've used the Hasselblad for sports and ive used mirrorless. . It's a fairly clumsy affair for that purpose, but then again, I've used old Rolliefex twin lense Reflex cameras for sports shots back in the film days. I'm not totally sold on mirrorless as tge future od digital photography. It's an infant technology and may or may not be accepted by photographers unless it's being forced on them (which it is). Mirrorless systems are being pushed by manufacturers because it's cheaper than DSLRs to make and has a larger profit margin. Fewer moving parts but more wear on shutters (shuttered on most mirroress cameras trip multiple times from one shot producing more wear on shutter mechanisms - notice how manufacturers shy away from shutter count lifetime on morrirless systems). Perfected "global" electronic shutter are still 10 years away. That, and you can cook a sensor if direct sunlight falls on it for too long as it can kill they Bayer grid on the sensor or the sensor itself. I'll yell ypu where the high end digital photography is going - back to DSLR and range findiner/SLR shutter systems. That said, I love the Canon R5c and have had no issues with it other than the electronic first shutter turning moving subjects into a Salvidor Dali painting. That said, when I shoot a really high end job, I still use medium and large format film cameras.
Thanks' for this advice! I retired five years ago and took up photography as a hobby and still shooting with DSLR's. I have been reading and thinking about the greatest and latest mirrorless cameras, which are just priced out of budget. I shoot with a Canon 80D and a Canon 6Dii, funny thing is I prefer the older 80D. At this point in my life, I now realize that I need to work on my skills, not improving my equipment. I feel that you have saved me a lot of disappointment and money. Thank you again.
Whose head? My equipment has grown with my needs, not ahead of them (also reasoned by finances). I have improved my tools and I do not regret it. I do more and better with them.
The best camera... is the one you already own. The camera may not be the problem... it's the photographer. I have 5-6 cameras that I purchased used. I also have vintage lenses and I enjoy shooting manually with the old glass. Thanks for the video Rick.
That is not always the case: the one I own is broken and I wish I had a new working one. Am I being superficial? ;o) But you are right if I add 5-6 cameras, even purchased used, my problem would be solved.
The global shutter is meant for sports photographers. The global shutter doesn't mean any given frame will be better - it means that you're more likely to get a better set of images to choose from. (Yes, I've shot sports professionally for many years, and have sometimes missed the perfect shot because I wasn't fast enough.) It's still really expensive, but will get cheaper over time
After using the 5D III for several years, I wanted to go mirrorless cause I saw other photographers going that way and felt like I needed to as well. So, I bought a Fuji XT-5. While I love the Fuji and tested several Sony mirrorless cameras…something felt off, like something was missing. A couple days ago I ended up buying a 5D IV, 85mm 1.2 II, and 70-200mm 2.8 and whatever I felt was missing using mirrorless, is not missing when shooting with an older DSLR. Using my 5D IV feels like HOME. There’s just something about that camera that helps me see the magic in photography again. My friends think I’m silly for not buying a Sony mirrorless, but I don’t even care cause I’m very content with what I have.
Completely agree. It’s not paint brush, it’s the painter. Plus a lot of UA-camrs are making commission from the latest gear and most of them don’t make anything
Glad i saw this video, i figured id like to delve into some photography, so i looked on Ebay and found a Nikon D3200 camera with a Nikon AF-S 18-135 lens about 11 years older, i know it is an entry level camera but im not starting out as a professional, so after learning some basics on how to set up and use the camera i took some close-up pictures outside in my backyard at some garden flowers, omg to my surprise i did not expect them to come out so clear, so this video at the least confirms you can get quality pictures from the older models, difference is the newer models have more bells n whistles, thank you for your post
Thank you for this gem of a video. One of the best I have ever watched. Not only do you address the key concern I had when I searched for the best camera for my daughter, but you went into the spiritual and human side of the art of photography and videography. The part about how we need challenges, the idea of diminishing returns, imposter syndrome…… You hit on some deep truths about our insecurities and fears and how the big corporations capitalize off of them. Bravo my friend. Brilliant
For sure, if you are a bad photographer, even with the best gear, you still stay like that. As always say to my students, first let's study the user manual of your camera, second, let's go outside to use it. That's it. Great video Rick.
I stopped buying new camera and lenses 5 years ago, my Canon eos r for my photpgraphy and Canon m6 mkii for vlogging has done me proud, I know these cameras inside out and also know my lenses and what I use them for. This video is something I have told people on my workshops for such a long time.
Wildlife photography is an entirely different matter.. I would say for static subjects you are correct.. However when you have extremely challenging lighting conditions shooting a subject moving very quickly at a distance having the fastest up to date a camera with the best dynamic range makes a big difference..
I shoot sport which has similar demands to wildlife. I shoot on an M50 mark II with some decent lenses. I compare my shots with our clubs professional photographer and for the most part, the quality is on par. Composition is more important (unless you are shooting in extremely poor lighting). People were shooting NBA matches or English Premier League matches on DSLR's with less than 10fps with great results. Skill trumps tech any day. Tech is one of those "nice to have, but not quite necessary" kind of scenarios
While I can agree that the newest tech updates are certainly beneficial to wildlife photographers getting more captures, I wonder if like this video said, whether things are becoming too easy. Is it much of an accomplishment if you simply can point an extremely high megapixel camera with a long lens in the direction of an animal and then hold the shutter down? At that point someone can essentially let the AI autofocus of the super computer in our hands take over, and they can easily reframe in post. Again, while I'm certain this will result in more keepers at the end of a day, I'm not sure if it's a good thing. Not to sound like a luddite!
From a practical point of view, I found that upgrading to the Canon R5 in 2020 helped overcome some of the limitations of getting older - it gave me better subject tracking, bright, detailed display, a flippy screen, lighter weight, IBIS, the ability to see all my settings at a glance in the viewfinder. I don't think it makes photography "easier" so much as making it more convenient and more fun. These upgrades also allow me to focus my senior mind on the stuff that matters - composition, light, and timing - and not on fussing with my equipment. But I do agree that you can "get the shot" with almost any modern gear, or even some less modern gear, if you want to work that hard.
Finally someone said this. My R6ii allows me to focus on framing and other techniques by merit of having the whole frame in its AF area - a far cry from my old 5D3 which had me worried about technical this, technical that. Yes, techniques are important, but if the tech is holding you back from thinking of the techniques, then the tech is not helping.
100% on spot l have telling people this for years. I fell into the trap of buying new Nikons ever two years, think I would improve. I was even taught better while I was a university photo major. The I saw the mirrorless train. But I did not get on. I was very happy with my D850. But I never sold my old gear, D800, D750, D80 , D3100 and D500. Not to mention film gear going back to 50s. I started spending all my time just taking 1000s of photos. And I started to see improvement in my work. I even take my old cameras out. Manufacturers only want to sell more. I know this because I spent 30 years I all aspects of retail. Sales on up to ownership. Great post.
All very true points I think. Cameras are becoming like mobile phones I feel. People think they need the latest all the time. I also agree that having a challenge is important. I shoot on a 20 year old Canon SLR as well as a 5 year old DSLR. While technically the Digital images are better, nothing beats the feeling of getting my film scans back and seeing how I’ve nailed my compositions. It’s so much more rewarding.
Camera sales arent even that great . Seems like people are just talking and bashing without actually buying and working with them. Companies are just saving money by having all these guys on youtube market for them instead of doing paid commercials and ads.
That's a fantastic analogy, thanks Sarah. I don't think I've paid any attention to the new phone releases in recent years because of it (although I did buy last years but that's because my existing phone got run over.... long story!).
technically 35mm film has a higher resolution than most cameras depending on how you scan... film has not been made obsolete by digital sensors it's a different way to the same result
One of the things I loved so much as a kid (Im 36) was shooting film. My grandmother gave me access to basically limitless blank film so i shot whatever i wanted as often as i wanted. the excitement of digging through the results to see what you got was part of the mystery. digital is cool, but i wish i still had one of my cheap childhood cameras or her ancient minolta tto shoot actual film again
You realise that if you scan and do not tiny in a darkroom you are going digital anyway. The difference is you and your attitude, process depending on the tools you use. You should be able to fix that with a little discipline ;o)
The idea that a camera that released 4-5 years ago is dated is insane to me. Sometimes I feel I'd quite like to update my Sony A6000 but the image quality is still so good it's impossible to justify blowing £1k+ just for a few better features.
the 5Dii is still to this day the most used Studio Camera in the world... pretty much says it all... image quality really hasn't changed in the last 15 years... sure cameras got some new bells and whistles... but 99.9% of them you never use
Great video Rick, and many thanks for the feature 😊 8:05 - my trusty 7 year old Canon 5D IV, 13 year old 70-300L & 10 year old 24-70L lenses are still my go to bits of kit! Still plenty of life and potential left in them for the photography I enjoy. This also reminds me of a quote I saw (apologies I can’t remember the author), something like… Beginners worry about gear, Amateurs worry about settings, Professionals worry about light (or as my friend better described it - the ‘moment’) It’s not what you have, it’s what you do with it that counts. This said, I do understand the benefit some photographers / videographers will get from the cutting edge bits of kit, and if it helps elevate their craft beyond the sake of just having the latest thing then go for it! 😊
D700 since 2010, added a D850 a year or so back. I don't see any reason to sell it all for a mirrorless setup as it all works perfectly. I don't need the speed of the new cameras to capture landscape photos. If the mountains start moving that fast I've got bigger problems than capturing an image... Learn everything you can about what you already own and use it... Great video, appreciate your candor, subscribed and signed up for your newsletter.
Same here, both amazing cameras, D850 has video, both well built and good handling, plus the lenses are probably more important. F mount lenses are great deals, now that z lenses are out.
@@jrt2792 at present time I’m not a videographer thus not a really big concern, nothing against those that do. However I realize a lot of still photographs are transitioning to video… Perhaps someday I’ll investigate video, I’ve done little bits on my iPhone but that’s the extent of it.
Well, for landscape and nature not all can travel 50 times in one location. Time is money, light and conditions can change quickly. Mirrorless setups can be considerably lighter with a lot better stabilization. This allows to shoot more handheld. Basicly after the "main" subjects you can focus on more stuff, which often can be overlooked.
I started using film with a Minolta SRT-101. When film is your medium, you either improve your skills or waste money on film/processing. Over the years I moved up through Nikon F2 gear, Nikonos, Mamiya and Bronica 645 and Pentax 6x7. I FINALLY gave in to digital in 2013 with what I thought was a reasonably worthy substitute, Sony NEX-7. Acquired an a7C last year. Through it all, it really comes down Great glass for sharp images, a solid body that allows me to select the proper Shutter/Aperture to get the image I am looking for. It’s your experience and the artistic abilities you’ve honed that make the image. While the economics of Digital cannot be beat, Ultimately, I still love the look and depth of images shot on film.
I started with a Pentax K1000. I went Minolta AF (D7 and D9) when I did a lot of horseracing, still do a bit of that. I only went digital when the Sony A900s came out. I have good Minolta G glass, some of which is pretty old by modern standards. I got a 99 Mk 2 when they came out which is even better than the 900s which I still use for a lot of things, and I don't see any need to upgrade at all beyond that. I'm done with upgrades.
Great video and wise words. I do astrophotography and a little general photography with canon 600D which is astro modified. Because the canon is modified the quick autofocus feature doesnt work anymore because the IR UV filter was removed and replaced with a different one. So for the past 2 months I've been thinking of getting a newer camera but didn't decided which brand to take and now after I watched your video you made it all clear to me what to aim for. Besides the canon I was obsessed at getting the best astro dedicated cameras and realized that it's just not worth it. Recently this year I produced my best astro image so far by just improving my technique and not buying better cameras or filters.
I use the same setup with the sky-watcher evoguide 50ed scope. It gives amazing results. The Canon T3i is still a great and fun camera to use. Heck, I still use my Canon Rebel Ti film camera.
It's a fun marketing concept to have the latest Sony A7R5 in your hands and to tell others don't do like me... in any case it works, it even brings in a record number of views! Good game ! You see, you too are good at marketing strategy! All you have to do is put your point of view into practice and even add more for the next video. I'm sure you can get 1 million views with it: I sold my Sony A7R5 to buy a Canon 500D and I feel much better. And then your marketing plan becomes grandiose! Magnificent !
I absolutely agree. You go to any camera shop and they will show cameras with massive iso ranges, 20fps etc... all about speed. I found the perfect camera for me in the Fuji x-pro 2.. All the reviews agree, it's a slow camera. This is a brilliant feature! It give time to think and compose, just like using old film cameras. The quality of my images has improved massively since I traded in my top of the range Nikon gear..
You've said it perfectly ! It's not easy to explain why photography should be a (slightly at least) difficult craft without soundikg like you are gatekeeping... great video !
One of my biggest flaws in my videography journey was looking for the fastest lens with the best low light camera to get good images in less-than-ideal situations. Then one day I bought a tiny portable light, and even at 25% if its brightness, i realized I could have saved hundreds and hundreds by just lighting properly. It’s still nice to have usable footage at high ISOs, but using good lighting and hitting native ISOs will always produce a better image.
I went mad on getting F1.4/1.8 primes for low light wherever I could. I then tried a F4 24 to 105 and was blown away with it. I now use that and a F4 70-200mm IS 99% of the time. My F2.8 70-200mm sits there. Less obsession = More fun!
@@jabezhane it’s funny how things come full circle. I’ve been looking at the 24-105 f/4 or f/2.8. I sold my RF 24-105 back in 2020 thinking that good primes would be better. They ARE better for indoors, but not nearly as versatile.
Hello Rick. I can't thank you enough for this video. I love photography and I am very new at it and it is very easy to get caught in the latest and greatest without developing the skill set once needs to become and master the skill set to understand how photography works and for me at least what type of photography I want to do. You got yourself a new subscriber. Cheers.
I agree completely. When I started building a recording studio, I wanted the best gear to be professional. Now, 20 years later, I can make pro recordings with the bare essentials. That’s not to say great equipment doesn’t help, but experience trumps gear in my experience. In audio or video, subject and presentation is the determining factor.
I tried the new kit and ended up selling everything and just using an original 5d for hobby shooting and a mk2 for work. There’s something about the early cameras that look very filmic compared to the new clinical look. For video I just picked up a £400 pocket 4k off mpb. Couldn’t be happier as the older gear makes you work for the result which gives more of an accomplishment feeling when it comes out great.
People valued the specs, cherish the final product but completely forgot the joy of taking a picture. If a blurry picture, which was taken while you were giggling, brings you the happy memory everytime you see it, it's the good photo. I remember the first time I hold a DSLR, it's a 3 digits canon model (550d or 600d), the joy of hearing the shutter click, the slight vibration when the mirror flip, couldn't be replicated. Later I was drugged by "1 digit canon" people, who said APSC canon is not enough, it's the main reason which is holding you back from taking a nice picture, they I sold my good old camera (with all of the lenses) for an used 5d mark 2 (which is a small fortune for a collegue student back then). But I can't produce any stunning photo. Then people said the 50mm is not enough, you need a 35, 85mm Sigma Art lens. Over and over again, I fell into a trap of buying new things with a false promise that I will take a better photo. But then it hit me when I buy the first MF lens, which is the industar (with star bokeh) and a Helios 44-3, I realized that actually my brain is the only thing which is holding me back and sadly it cannot be upgraded or replaced. With the MF lens, I actually have to think a lot to take a photo, then the stunning image started to show up. Now I understand that no gear or equipment is necessary to make good photo, it completely relies on your hand and your heart. Close your heart to it, then you can take a soulful picture.
How do you know what "people" cherish? Forget? Find joy in? On the other hand you are right it is the photographer who should make the decisions and be responsible for his/her photographs, the gear is just a tool to help reach one's goals. Different goals, different tools though.
I've watched this great video 3 times...I needed to hear this as I've strongly considered moving from Fuji to Sony...a huge cost switch...but really there is no need. Thank you!
These are mature words. I'm 29 year old. Got my first camera when I was 22, it was a Nikon d7200 which I've loved. Let me tell you that I regret selling that camera so much after I've purchased the Sony A7 III. He is right in this video. Modern cameras have lost their soul in a way that it steals the joy of challenge and pursuit. Everything is far too easy . Today I've purchased a 35mm GM 1.4 while I already have a 35 2.8, 28-75 2.8 and an 85mm 1.8. I've realised that the only factor that is limiting my skills is myself and not the gear. If you are struggling with gear acquisition remember that your skills will not improve by getting more gear. I've canceled the order of the 35 in the same day I've bought it. It felt so liberating and I was really empowered to push myself further with what I already have ! Trust yourself my friend. Don't listen to all reviews on UA-cam. Everybody is trying to make some money by pushing reviews on products you just don't need ! What you need is some discipline and to educate yourself in whatever you're trying to achieve. Good luck
What you can't see in images from older/lesser gear is the missed pictures. Removing the technical barriers let's photographers concentrate on where and when to point the camera, which is where the art part starts.
I don’t know, Kevin… I often think about my Nikon D3. I don’t remember a situation when I ever thought “man, I missed a great shot, I wish I had a newer camera”. In fact, I don’t think that I ever missed a shot with it. Either a D3 can make the photo, or conditions are so terrible that no camera will.
@romansivers This really depends upon what sort of photography one is doing. I started photographing birds with a camera that had several AF points and blazed away at three frames per second. Birds change poses faster than I could keep up. Now, with full-screen AF and high frame rate, my composition is better because i can frame the bird and the background. And I am getting all the interesting head and tail positions. There are lots of tech improvements that allow us to concentrate on things that matter to us.
I kind of get this, but the missed pictures to me are a huge part of the learning experience. It's one of the things that adds to our photographic growth. Plus, most of my 'missed pictures' are down to my own ineptitude...
I fully agree with this but I do think it depends on the type of photography you do. For example if you are a studio shooter of a photographer that simply has the luxury of time to dial in settings and focus then I can say it doesn’t matter what gear you use. But something like wedding photography I’d say your camera matters more to an extent. Good autofocus, fps, dynamic range, low light performance are features that newer cameras would have and benefit a wedding photographer greatly in consistently capturing more great moments in limited time
Almost any camera from the last 5 years will do the job. I've shot weddings and engagements with 2 x M50 bodies and a Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sigma 56mm f1.4 The clients loved the results
As a hobbyist that shoots & loves fujifilm, I love everything about this video. I also love using gear that makes me want to pick it up and use it everyday/everywhere. Thank you.
I want to have a „clapping hands“ symbol in UA-cam to react on this video instead of the boring „thumbs up“. Thank you, thank you, thank you for this statement. Absolutely right. Stop runnning and start enjoying our great passion „photografy“ slowly…😊
@@drftrkjhguvgggfd cheap? He calls cameras from 2014-2019 worth 300-1000$ on the 2nd hand market "old"... I shot from 2015-2021 with a Canon EOS 550D i bought 2nd hand for 70€. THAT was old as i got rid of it! And except for basic stuff, GEAR MATTERS. For example only as i got a Canon EOS RP and a RF 800 F11 lens i could catch some wildlife photography experience.... EOS 550D + old 75-300 IS USM was absolutely garbage for that kind of stuff and it took me multiple months to get my first "usable" and good shot (manual focus mainly due to bad AF motors in cheap lens and bad AF in old entry level body, on top even misaligned AF sensors...) One week with the EOS RP and RF 800 F11 and i had like 10 "good" shots without much hassle. Astrophotography, another thing which was literally impossible on my 2nd hand, budget, bad tracking telescope due to the need of 4-8 minutes exposure time (ISO 800 on 550D), with the EOS RP (ISO 6400 best setting) i can decrease exposure time to 30-60 seconds, where this old, messed up equatorial mount keeps up good enough. Also, since i have a 750mm telescope, APS-C (1200mm) was too tight for most stuff anyways, even 750mm with Full Frame is still somewhat annoying (too tight for california nebula, andromeda galaxy etc...)
Great video Rick. Modern APSC camera’s definitely hold up in most situations and save you loads of money when it comes to lenses. A lot depends on what your shooting.
In photography light n shadow is key. A camera is a tool, lens determines how far you are from the subject and what you intend to capture. Low apertures lens allow you to shoot in poor lighting, however shooting at a low aperture one must inst Dane dept of field and focal plane. If you are shooting at night at a low aperture and only certain parts of your subject in focus then you have focus stack. Key to photography is seeing the shot before you.take it, when you see it you will know what lens to use and what lighting you want. The most important thing is light then comes shadow that creates depth then lens then camera to capture it.
Started with an Olympus OM10 and moved to canon and Now Using a Small Sony A6400. Been worried that I could not go for a A6700 because I needed IBIS and 4K 60. Your video helped a lot to capture more with the existing A6400
I own a Fujifilm X-T4 and XF 100-400 mm and I use it for wildlife photography. The autofocus, on 35%of the cases is all over the place. I was thinking to move to OM System or to Canon but my question is: Would I get at least 90% sharp photos to compensate for the extra cash that I will have to spend?
Fujifilm known for af performance issues for a decade i have Om system E-M1 Mark 3 and Sony a7iv for wildlife and Macro photography i can safety say for taking Macro shots OM system has huge advantage even in wildlife espically animal portrait and bird photography OM system has advantage because of shallow depth of field and 2x crop factor i'm going to use these 2 systems for at least five years i'm from Turkey cameras,lenses and other equipments are extremely expensive in here .
I got myself a d810 recently, it does everything I need and much more. Actually I think it's better than any of the mirrorless offerings for me because of the OVF and battery life.
??? have you ever used a mirrorless, a recent one? I doubt it. The EVF provides far more useful tools than an OVF (if only regarding exposure). Yes, mirrorless consume more power but usually two batteries will (and should) cover the day, so just take an extra battery and enjoy the pluses of EVFs ;o)
I completely agree. There’s more fulfillment in the process than owning gear. I managed to bag myself a pocket 6k, shot a few short films and started landing gigs I could never imagine myself having before. It is the purpose that really matters and not necessarily the gear .
A very good video again! Thanks. While I know gear certainly won't make me a better photographer, I know why I buy it: I'm a tech nerd and I love high tech. Plus I can't blame gear for the bad photos I take, It's all my fault. And we can't deny that photography is an art highly related to gear.
Thanks Gabriel. I get that, I'm a bit of a tech nerd too!! Great that you can be honest with yourself as people struggle with that - I certainly have in the past.
It is highly related to gear up to a point. If you have a reasonably recent camera and lenses for the type of photography you like to do then upgrading to the latest and greatest gear isn't going to improve your photography to any significant degree. You'd probably have to pixel peep just to tell the difference between your new gear and your old gear. Maybe if you are a sports or wildlife shooter you might get more keepers with improved focus tracking and higher burst rates but in most situations you'd be hard pressed to show improvements in your photography with new gear even as far as just basic image quality goes. When it comes to composition or subject selection there'd be zero improvement. You'll still be the same photographer you were before, just with newer and fancier gear.
Still using my Canon R6 for UA-cam and client work I’ve had since launch. Love it and know it inside out! Think it will last me another few years at least 👌
Totally agree. My 5Dmk3 is relatively old but is very solid even now. I still use my 60D sometimes, which is my very first camera, and it still gets the job done well enough. I've tried some recent mirroless cameras and i can see how big of a improvement it can be in terms of AF. However it's not going to change how the photo is framed, composition, what's the content of the photo and such. They can makes good photos better and easier sometimes. But can never make bad ones good. 90% of it is determined by the photographer while the gears are merely a tool. People can take extraordinary photos with their phones as well. Looking at photos from many years ago, art is not based on technology. Technology makes art easier and better in some ways, but never will be a deterministic factor.
I still use a Nikon D3S (a camera that was made in 2010) for my professional work in 2023. It's built like a tank and the only thing it can't do is shoot proper video. At 12MP, it's enough for just about any event coverage that I do. I've never met a client who complained about my image quality. For video as well as my 'higher' megapixel needs, I have my Nikon mirrorless on the side.
Rick, I agree with a lot of what you're saying. That said, did I really "need" the Sony A7RV? Yes and no. I am turning 70 in 5 months, wear glasses and have shaky hands. The A7RV's autofocus and IBIS make my life so much easier. It's an amazing camera for me. But, oh man! It took a big chunk out of my budget. LOL
I think that highlights a great point. If there is something about your current kit that is truly limiting you (like a like of IBIS as you say), then it is worth upgrading 👍🏻
When I bought my first Nikon dslr, the salesman who was quite old said to me " You are taking up a very costly hobby" I couldn't understand what he meant that time. But now I understand why these manufacturers trick us to buy newer models just by adding a little extra improvement on the older model. Same with the lens manufacturers. I couldn't find huge difference between a 50 mm f1.8 and a costly 50 f1.4 lens.
on the flip side, i never understood what people mean with this ''its so expensive'' crap. photography does not need to be expensive AT ALL. get a used camera body for like 200-400 bucks. stock up on a couple vintage prime lenses for pennies and start creating. i mean, you can even get something like a d700 for under 200$ sometimes. what i have noticed quite often is that there is a huge gap between photographers and creators and ''gear collectors'' if you go by the locig that just owning a camera and pressing a button makes one a photographer, than everyone in the world is a photographer because everyones phone has a camera. unfiltered truth however: probably 90% of people owning a camera have absolutely zero creative talent whatsoever and just point a camera somewhere and press a button. wich creates a quite interesting scenario: if you dont have any creative talent and just take snapshots of random stuff like you dont even need a good camera for, then the gear you re using doesnt matter anyways because the photos you put out are not great regarless. on the flipside you can put whatever camera into the hands of a photographer who has some sort of talent and they will produce some nice photos with it. i have seen this countless times. back then those ''dads with money'' buying fancy canons with L Glass and when you look at their photos you kind of cringe to a point you re asking yourself why they waste so much money on camera equipment. and those people are the ones constantly discussing and bragging about tech and camera specs and buying new gear and ... bro... you have no feel of color or lighting, you dont understand compositions, you have no creative ideas and your ''skill'' in postproduction makes the photos even worse (remember those portrait photos from people who slap gaussian blur on peoples skin so that they look like some weird abstract wax figures? put some fancy glow effect on top and voila... yeah those types) it quite literally does not matter if that person buys new gear or whatnot. you cant buy yourself creativity and talent. its the same like with other crafts. there are carpenters who build incredible unique furniture. yeah, i can buy the same tools those craftsman use, but i still have no clue what to do with them and cant even put a simple shelf onto the wall
I think most people know this, but like any other gear purchase, most are just looking for excuses when they hit a creative block or lack photography skills to begin with. Its partially subconscious but some people just buy new gear and are unwilling to accept or spend time to get better. I have taken photos for six years and I still haven't bought a firsthand camera or something that is less than 3 years from launch, because aside from some niche situations, its still obvious that the bottleneck is myself and not the camera. Aside from a workable AF, IBIS/OIS, and decent ergonomics, almost everything else is fluff. A trained photographer with an a6000 will still take massively better pictures than the guy with an a9 that upgrades every year.
And some, when they get to a financial block, look for an excuse to convince themselves to listen to reason (finances). It may sound like a little tongue in cheek but there is some truth to it ;O) ...look at this video again with that angle.
its the same as when they try to promote bigger tvs with higher res, where as many times you find yourself watching a 720 content or documentary for hours and its just fine.
In my opinion the lenses matter even more. Because lenses are also dropping nowadays like flies, it would have been great to ask which lenses were taken with each photographers, to see how well some lenses age, and how timeless some lenses can be. Thanks for the video.
well, the one or few things camera companies dont tell you is how much they hire people to promote themselves as VIDEO cameras while using Photos samples to claim the camera gets great bokeh etc etc, camera mode on DSLR or Mirrorless requires yu flip the shutter twice the amount of your frame rate, this is a huge difference between photo and Camera modes., its crazy to think its something to ignore, your seen great photos thinking wow, I can vlog with this but its not true and even once you set it up to video you realise you need a full frame if cropped or another lens..
Another great video, Rick. I recently upgraded my kit to the Nikon Z6ii. Before that I was very happy with my Nikon D5600. In terms of picture quality and features, it is a hard camera to beat for landscape folks on a budget. As I was getting better, I was liking a few aspects of the mirrorless world and was wanting the addition of weather sealing. I could’ve bought an older DSLR with weather sealing but figured I would “future proof” myself a little bit and plan to keep the Z6 for quite some time as it has everything (probably more) that I need. I always think of it as gear doesn’t matter until you are limited in some aspect. Again, Rick, great series look forward to the next one. 👏🏻👏🏻
Thanks Andy, appreciate you keeping on coming back and commenting! Yep, that totally makes sense. Love that - "gear doesn't matter until you are limited in some aspect". Hits the nail on the head.
I actually like the challenge of shooting one frame each time I press the shutter. One. Shooting too many frames per second only makes editing more frustrating. It's overwhelming to compare minute differences between frames. To me, anyway, it takes the fun away.
Exactly it becomes something reductionist which takes all the beauty out of the art away. The idea that you’re just performing trial and error until the camera basically gets the right photo is so cheap to me.
xes, spray nd pray vs. 'the 'decicuve moment' ala CB,. wIse words drom Rick. bIy mnt used on ebay, wth a-z guarantee. 5-6MP can be enough, 40 plus, is overkill.ccd, ok,too.
Something worth mentioning in favor of higher-end gear is the human factor. Specifically inspiration and commitment. Learning photography is hard. I bought a cheap (but good) point-and-shoot with full manual capabilities to learn on. I tried and gave up. Too hard. A few years later I spent many hundreds on a DSLR and good zoom lens. I was inspired to learn and, after spending all that money, I felt committed to stick with it. I am happy I did as I am well on my way. My photos aren't much better than the point-and-shoot but now I know what I am doing and I enjoy it much more. You make good points but you also come across jaded. You do say true things but what other true things didn't you say?
I totally agree with you. One thing I would like to ad is: I would like it when more cameras would be made only for video or photography. I think all the compromise that is done on hybrids is giving us less than more.
I am a photographer. The newest cameras are just tools like they were 100 years ago they just make the work easier. Don’t expect the pictures to jump right off the screen.
The biggest photography ripoff of all time is convincing people to pay up to 50% more for mirrorless camera bodies and lenses that in some cases are the same quality or only a slight increase from DSLRs.
I came from a Full frame Canon and after an accident in the ocean I bought a Fujifilm XT-3 and love it !! You cannot BUY talent, whether it's golf clubs, guitars, cameras or whatever, you're right in that be content with what you have and learn from what you have
At last, a young photographer who has seen the light. I have been a photographer , one time pro, for over 45 years, nearly 60 years from the time I picked up my first Instamatic. Although I still shoot film in all formats including 4X5 and 5X7, for over twenty years I have shot digital. The digital cameras of today are just imaging computers. They are not cameras. The sensor records a scene ( sensor is an analogue device BTW, not digital ), sends the voltage generated to the ADC and the very powerful computers inside the camera start to work on the data. It is then ' reassembled ' and displayed as a ' photograph' on the LCD and recorded to the card. We have already seen the implementation of AI noise reduction in camera. AI does not reduce noise, it re-renders a scene pixel by pixel, and produces something based on the original data. AI assisted focusing? What on earth is that? It sounds to me that if the camera misses focus, it is quicker for it to re-render a ' sharpened ' frame than to try and refocus mechanically. All in all, I view all these as irrelevant features to the art of photography. Not for me. I stick to my Leica M film and Digital cameras . Others may have different opinions.
It's been a while since I've been described as 'young', so thanks for that!! 'Imaging computers'... that's so true. I agree with all of that though. The AI nonsense has just pushed it too far for me - when did we start calling anything with a chip in it 'AI powered'?!
Its not just this channel but I am kind of tired of all these UA-cam photographers saying hey you do not need the latest and greatest yet they all have the latest and greatest. Lately I have been gravitating to photographers that are actually shooting with gear that most of us can afford. It is nice to see them actually get nice images with kit that I can afford. Examples are Henry Turner, Chris Baitson, David Flower, Joshua Peg and the amazing work of D Griff. Most of these photographers actually make it a point to shoot on "normal" gear to show what you can get and yes it proves that gear does not matter but they are actually showing it. Now this is not to get on Rick or this channel as it is good but yeas I agree with dduster1167 on this.
@@rickmower1136 so it would make you feel better if people look poor and act poor before they tell you common sense and save you money? At the end of the day all these new hybrid cameras in like the last 3 years do about 99% of the same shit and no one can tell the difference from the finished product. How you get there might vary slightly but if you expose properly or use lighting, they are basically indistinguishable.
Fair points 👍🏻 I think when you are working professionally (and video work is my job), then it's a bit different. You wouldn't be happy if a taxi driver picked you up in a banged up Vauxhall Astra for example. If clients are putting their trust in me, I want something that I have zero doubts about and is going to work no matter what. The majority of the photo UA-cam audience aren't professionals which is why I think the message is valid. That's why I thought it was important to show images taken on older kit, and why I showed images I took on a camera that can be picked up for a lot less now. I realise that it cost me more at the time, but like I said towards the end - I genuinely would go back to using older 'normal' kit (and may even do so next year). I'm not going to take hate on the hat though, it was a gift!!
@@RayValdezPhotography So your second point I agree with you. The first comment I am not sure why you made it, I said nothing about being poor or if it would make me feel better. Just an observation that this keeps happening with photographers saying gear does not matter but to them it does. Sure it is a message about common sense (that good) but they don't practice what they preach. Shoot with what ever you like and feels right to you, I just choose to follow the work of people that are humble with the gear they have and produce great work.
@@RickBebbington Thanks for the response and I do appreciate the message. I was not trying to bash on you directly but just pointing out that this is pretty common theme with some youtube photographers. You are professional and you made a great point on the need for your kit and how it works for you. Keep up the great work.
Hello Rick, I just subscribed to your channel. I'm a beginner in both videography and photography. Thank you for giving tips like this; it will help me better understand the world of cameras.
You Got It! I even got to the point a well known local news station. They taking my photos for news and web site. They thought i was using great camera gear. Well it was a $200 cell phone! I have tons of stories like that. " Great camera gear does not mean great photos "
Rick, I own an entry level DSLR (a Nikon d3400) that I've been using for years as a hobby and recently for architecture photography as a business . I want to get into fine art photography too, and as I understand will need to de able to do big prints in the future. What would be a good choice to upgrade from my camera to enter in this market? Great video btw!!
I agree, in spite of the fact that I bought a new mirrorless camera last year. I didn’t need it. I do love it though. Some of the best photos I took last year were on 40 year old 35mm cameras.
Awesome, honest video… I’ve been thinking on “upgrading” my a7 Iv to a 7R cuz I need to print out to a very large format.. I use the camera exclusively to photograph my artwork.. do you think I can achieve the same quality with the a7iv resolution?? Thanks
Hard to say without knowing the size and seeing it in print. It's worth testing before you upgrade, and maybe even exploring the super-resolution type features in Lightroom and Photoshop that may give you what you are after. Good luck!
Im on a Canon R6 for a few years now, Tamron 70-200, Sigma 50mm, and I just got an old Canon EF 24-70mm. Fighting all the time the temptation to get RF lenses. At the end of the day, im just a dad who loves photography and mostly does sports (any sport the kids at playing at the moment)
Started by looking at the a7Siii. And I continuously asked questions and looked for unbiased videos and I ended up getting a pre-owned a6100. I am happy that we get honest videos like this. thank you.
I don't do any giveaways on Telegram - please be careful of anyone trying to impersonate me! Also, thanks for all the support on this - the video has reached way beyond what I expected!! it'll take some time to get through all the comments 🙏🏻
Are you saying I DIDN`T win a pet kangaroo?
Which camera and lens have you used to make this video ?
my dad just gave me a canon eos 20d with about 7,000 $ worth of tripods and lenses while visiting him. As well as a bunch of outdated stuff I dont need at all like cf card readers the size of my first dvd player lol.
I was sweating the age of the camera because I kept hearing its liek an ancient dino when i started researching. But then I saw some of the pictures hanging in my dad house, awesome action shots of flying eagles, a hawk landing, up close action of my uncle doing a wheelie on his racing bike. I just thought, man if he could take these as a side hobby photographer using the 20d back then, then I can do the same thing now, regardless of how many newer cameras there are. This camera did it, and it still can. It was sobering to stop nd realize that.
I immediately slid a rack of lithiums in there and started shooting. 1,500 images later, and 1,740 approx miles of road trip later, Im so happy I didnt just pack it away with dreams of "figuring out a newer camera for the lenses at some point" Crazy though, as soon as I got home and thought about it, sitting here at my desk figuring out how to run the canon printer he gave me on my linux systems, I randomly found this video.
I love my £100 Canon D7s. Getting great pictures of wildlife.
This video is just a waste of time. The best camera exists, but you have to find it yourself because no one on the internet will tell you what it is
As a 91 year old and still a serious amateur photographer, and a mechanical engineer who worked in the image making industry, (taking photos since I was 13), I agree with your observations and conclusions. If I could, I would send you photos taken by me 78 years ago with a Kodak 120 Autographic Special folding camera that I am proud of today.
sir, do you have Instagram account or Facebook? I want to see your photos, your works must be amazing
As a 51 year old who got into photography when I was 19 years old, I can say I’m glad film was still the thing when I got into photography. It’s crazy how the old stuff is coming back. Well at least the film look is popular now.
I so would love to see them
Какие тебе камеры, тебя смерть посрать отпустила
Same here! I'd love to see those pictures
We are living in an age of consumerism and the social media algorithms are designed to make us think our desires are our needs. One of the most honest videos I have watched on UA-cam. You just got yourself a dedicated subscriber.
You have photograohers on YT that are honest, just like in this video, ppl with normal facial expresion and simple honest words.
Thanks, appreciate it!
So you're saying other photographers and videographers like Matt Johnson, Jared Polin, Gerald Undone, Julia trotti, Dan Watson, Petal Pixel, Potato Jet, Jason Vong, and many other media people who have been in the game for 5+ years are just lying to their audience? Lying to them to get them to buy new cameras and new gears so they can make money off of them?
You're just as ignorant as Rick Bebblington is. Sony's cameras are made by us and for us. We tell them what we would like to see in the next model and what they need to fix. Sony listens to their fans and the people because they want to deliver quality cameras and lenses. A7ii to A7iii was a huge jump as it feature a bigger battery, faster autofocus, more autofocus points, picture profiles, 4K video resolution, etc. It isn't consumerism to tell you to buy a new camera. It's because the a7iii improved on the a7ii in every freaking way that its worth the upgrade. A7iv is exactly the same thing. Sony added 10-bit colors along with its amazing video autofocus thus making it the perfect hybrid camera.
If you don't need it or dont care for it, then don't buy it. None of those youtubers i listed tells you to go out and buy it. They review the cameras, give their honest opinions on it, tell you who the cameras are for, and most of all, they know what the heck they're talking about. I bought an a7iv after my a7iii because i wanted 10-bit colors, S-cinetone, video auto tracking and so much more. Do you know how much an a7iv would have cost back in 2015? $5,000 usd easily because of what it can do.
It's like you saying Godox doesn't need to produce their AD600 with HSS. Rode doesn't need to produce Wireless Go. And DJI doesn't need to produce the mini Pro 3. And It's always the ignorant people who does not do their research that thinks new gears and cameras are just consumerism.
Nicely said...
Nicely said...
I agree 100% . Shooting raw and learning post processing will make a bigger difference in how your photos look. Getting out and shooting a lot will make you a better photographer.
👏👏
You need both.....they are not seperate.
So true, and something I definitely need to work more on.
Nothing wrong jpeg sagger lover
. You don't necessarily need raw
OMG.... it's about time somebody opened up their mouth and stated the obvious. All these UA-cam channels trying to tell us to buy the latest gear, reviewing this new camera and this new lens. Thank you sir for this video. It was long overdue!
Not all UA-cam channels tells it. I'm starting also on English/Estonian talking about photography industry
Listen, as soon as a new camera, car, TV, phone, color or whatever comes out, the one we have is instantly inferior or “not good enough.” How can we enjoy what we have knowing there’s a newer one out there? We are strongly compelled to think this way. When do we put the brakes on our personal consuming, when we run out of money? After all, there’s a newer version of everything in our lives.
I've been a professional photographer for 58 years now, and the newest camera I own is 10-12 years old. You "want better pictures"? Keep your camera and make 100 images DAILY. THEN you'll know how to USE your camera properly. The late great Ansel Adams used a 105 year-old POOR QUALITY lens ( a Goertz Convertible Anastigmat ) for at least 50 of his MOST FAMOUS images, on an obsolete format (film size) European view camera, he had to trim-down 4x5 film for. He knew HOW to use what he HAD beyond question. All a lens and camera do is RECORD light and shadows. Learn HOW to use light and what makes an interesting image. "The Command to LOOK" is a classic out-of-print book on composition. Classic painters knew what made people look good. Read-up on them. During the Covid scare, I told a hundred or more beginning photographers to take a soup can, set it on a table in a dark room and use ONE BARE continuous light on a stand and MOVE the light around to SEE the effect on an electronic image. Every single one that tried it became MUCH better photographers. I'm NOT really a portrait photographer, but I've made hundreds of portraits with ONE LIGHT, many that I sold for 5 figures.
I'm just getting started, your comment was very helpful thank you so much. Will try the soup bowl training 💪
10-12 years that's when digital technology ripes and start to hit the point of dimminished returns. Sony's A7R2 was released 10 yrs ago. Who need more than that? For anyone who is an amateurs that don't shoot "gig" or work for "client", I'd add to use the money for plane tickets. Wonderful places are garantees for wonderful photos -- given you already know how to use your camera properly. That's all you need.
Well said. You have really helped me with my camera purchase today. Hahah bought a lumix g7
So true. Once the camera becomes a fully integrated extension of the human eye ones art gets interesting. Gear is important but experience so much more.
I couldn't have put it better myself . I use a richo kr-10 super for film I bought 40 years ago and for digital photography, I use a pentax k-5 which is 14 years old. The Camera isn't that important - it's how we interpret light as you pointed out.
Blowing thousands on the newest tech is waste of money. There are paid photographers that still shoot on dslrs and movies/commercials being recorded on older cinema cameras with older lenses.
👏👏
The vast majority. And they are working and published not on you tube. All good as they are tools. The newest can be a headache by lacking compatibility and robust construction. Output rules.
Oh ya betcha. I just upgraded to the new Crown Graphic Press Camera. It has all the bells and whistles you would ever need.
We know sagger lover
Production Value.
Any photographer that eventually goes through this "trap" knows what he is talking about and confirm. I started photography 6 years ago, and I took a loan to buy the most expensive camera and lightning equipment doing projects and hoping it would bring me forward as an artist. I was worried they would break as they were my tools and I needed them to produce. Many years later I`ve now sold most of it and went back to one of my first cameras. I have a few good lenses that are considered "old" and I can bring them out even on a rainy day without worrying. Thanks for an amazing video I hope it can help many people ☺
Same. I just sold my mirrorless setup and bought an old full frame DLSR and 50mm. TBH I prefer the look of the D700 series sensors over the new mirrorless stuff. The color just looks nicer. All cameras are so good these days it’s more of a style preference if anything.
it boils down to: you either got it or you don’t, you can’t force talent or skill.
Subscribed
It's funny how camera companies make you think you need certain features. There's a fine line between what you're allowed to do and what you can do. In terms of strict photography, modern cameras have only had minor improvements; most still features are just "quality of life" upgrades rather than actual "game changers." Videos are a bit different, but honestly, how many of us are shooting professional videos rather than just using our phones? Since most of these features are more about convenience, it ultimately comes down to question whether I can afford a luxurious lifestyle.
Isn't that funny just how accurate timing can be sometimes? This video popped up just when I needed it - THANK YOU!
And now you have +1 follower as well.
After hesitating because of the cost, I upgraded from a full frame DSLR to mirrorless this summer and wished I had done it several years ago. The improvement in autofocus alone was worth it because with eye AF I'm getting far fewer rejects that were a bit soft or missed focus altogether, and am spending less time trying to nail focus. I also see improvements in detail in portraits and better colour rendition. Another big improvement is night photography. The last few times I've gone out to do urban scenes I left the tripod at home and I don't miss it. I'm getting away with ISO 2000 where I would never attempt it before. I'm glad I didn't see this video when I was looking for a new camera!
Had the same experience upgrading from Nikon D5600 to Sony A7IV. It just makes you want to use the camera more :)
yeah I recently sold my Nikon d610. as much as I loved that camera for landscape photography, it was a pain in the ass trying to nail focus on low light situations for street photography. I'd often miss shots or they'd be out of focus when attempting to shoot moving subjecta. Furthermore, having to lug a heavy DSLR around can often put you off taking out to shoot photos. I'm now in the market for a mirrorless camera. maybe something like the Fuji XT-5.
Yeah going to a z6ii from a D90 was revelatory. I have done my best work. I don't think going to a z9 would improve much. Nor would an 85 1.2. but the kit that I have assembled has pushed me and my capabilities for sure.
@@Cleverconveyence the z6ii migh be a another great option for me. Is there anyhting you don't like about the camera?
I definitely agree upgrading from dslr to mirrorless is a no brainer, I’ll even say upgrading my Eos R to a R5C was a definite upgrade in work flow. As a photographer/videographer
The upgrade was appropriate and had paid itself off!!!
‘it’s all about investment into the creative process, not investment into the gear you use for that creative process.’ so much more valuable. well said my friend.
I believe investment is required for a certain limit (non latest tech) because without minimal gear there is no creative it's just an imagination 😂😂😂
I couldn't agree more! Grew up in the 60s last century with fully manual film cameras. No AF, no automatic programs, even no light metering. You had to learn the whole stuff the hard way and I am glad to have made this experience!
Right on. I shot weddings with a 6x6 manual Mamiya camera.
You are gonna make me cry!! The good old days. With all the high tech cameras we have today, my all time favorite was/is my beloved, manual everything Pentax MX!
@@boristahmasian9604 I had an old Nikkorex. Started with that. Now I love using my D700 over my newer models.
You can go back to all that, but, (depending upon what you're photographing) would you?
Sounds stressful!! (shooting weddings on a 6x6!) I used to do weddings on digital and that was stressful enough, fair play!
I totally agree with you, that's why I am asking you and other UA-camrs to focus more on the storytelling. Show up examples of pitches to clients, treatments, putting ideas on paper, shot selections etc. The story is where the real art is.
Learning to shoot with the gear you have is the best lesson in photography I've learnt so far. 👌
and learning what features actually mean and how to use them in the right scenarios!
Well there is a newsflash or an open door kicked in.
I say, if you have the money buy what you like.
This is the most honest and truthful explanation of buying a camera I’ve seen from anyone on UA-cam. Because, sir, you are speaking straight truth. Glad I found your channel! Thanks!
Thanks, I really appreciate that ☺️
1st SLR I owned was a Pentax K1000, with which I learned not just how to take pictures, but also how to develop them in a darkroom. I love how practical digital photography is, but there is nothing more magic than seeing your image emerge in a little plastic tray of chemicals.
+1. I second that, shooting since the 80's with Film, and i love it. No display onto the backside, no broken aesthetics, no fumbling onto your gear, because you're in search, dire need of feature xyz, into the decisive moment. Digital nowadays since some couple years is boring for my needs, i do shoot (seldom) digital, just to save film cost. I do even shoot less 35mm Film nowadays, because of the cost. But with film, even you never have 36-40 frames as keepers, it always gives me a smile, after cocking, hitting the shutter. Never the same kind of (slow) approach & feeling, with digital. With film, you think perhaps 5-12 times, before the shutter release - and whileas digital was never meant to be spray & pray, or run & gun, by design, i do think less, when shooting digital. It's not a haptic medium, it's not the same, not the same kind of slow approach, and everything else. Into contrast to (35mm) film - it's of course better, but not always...and doesn't feel "right" into the same way, as film. And for large format photography, there's simply no alternative with digital. These guys are really do *know* what they're doing.
1st 35mm SLR - Pentax MX, SMC-A 50/1.7...the nifty-fifty never felt right...for my eyes. Then switch over to another system hence bajonet and brand, and was never been happier. 2nd System Minolta, still like my XD7 way much, with a 35/2.8 MD mostly.
100% agree...
The dark room ( red light) b&w ...in the late 70's ...is a time of my life..that can't be cut out.
Mine was a Minolta XG1
First camera I owned was the same camera. Pentax K1000. when I was stationed in Germany. The gym complex also had a dark room where I learned to develop my film. Wow memories come flooding back..
Spot on! In 40 years of photography, I've only bought two cameras new. One was a Hasselblad in the late 70s, and a new Canon 5D MK IV (and I have 3 other used MK IV bodies used). I still shoot film cameras that are up to 100+ years old. The best part is that I can use 'vintage' DKL mount lenses from the 1950s and adapt earlier lenses to digital cameras. Megapixels are, for the most part, a marketing ploy. Mirrorless is also a marketing ploy for 99% of what anyone needs. Also, new technology is prone to "Infant mortality" in comparison to older, tried and true DSLRs. Buy used, buy only what you need for what you do.
You give me hope 👌
Thank you. As someone who’s dusted off my Rebel 300d. As a hobbyist. I’m not convinced that a mirror less Camera is going to make me better. I’m imagining that as the video suggests. Getting out and taking photos can make you better.
My favorite camera of all time is and always will be my Nikon F2A!!!!!!
Have you ever used a mirrorless camera for any length of time? Have you ever shot sport with a Hasselblad for any length of time? How often do you use your 100+ cameras (if you can still find film for it and remembering we are in 2023). ;o)
On the other hand I totally agree with your last statement.
@BrunoChalifour yeah, I've used the Hasselblad for sports and ive used mirrorless.
. It's a fairly clumsy affair for that purpose, but then again, I've used old Rolliefex twin lense Reflex cameras for sports shots back in the film days. I'm not totally sold on mirrorless as tge future od digital photography. It's an infant technology and may or may not be accepted by photographers unless it's being forced on them (which it is). Mirrorless systems are being pushed by manufacturers because it's cheaper than DSLRs to make and has a larger profit margin. Fewer moving parts but more wear on shutters (shuttered on most mirroress cameras trip multiple times from one shot producing more wear on shutter mechanisms - notice how manufacturers shy away from shutter count lifetime on morrirless systems).
Perfected "global" electronic shutter are still 10 years away. That, and you can cook a sensor if direct sunlight falls on it for too long as it can kill they Bayer grid on the sensor or the sensor itself. I'll yell ypu where the high end digital photography is going - back to DSLR and range findiner/SLR shutter systems.
That said, I love the Canon R5c and have had no issues with it other than the electronic first shutter turning moving subjects into a Salvidor Dali painting. That said, when I shoot a really high end job, I still use medium and large format film cameras.
Thanks' for this advice! I retired five years ago and took up photography as a hobby and still shooting with DSLR's. I have been reading and thinking about the greatest and latest mirrorless cameras, which are just priced out of budget.
I shoot with a Canon 80D and a Canon 6Dii, funny thing is I prefer the older 80D. At this point in my life, I now realize that I need to work on my skills, not improving my equipment.
I feel that you have saved me a lot of disappointment and money.
Thank you again.
I have been in the photographic industry for 61 years and from what you said you have hit the nail on the head!
Whose head? My equipment has grown with my needs, not ahead of them (also reasoned by finances). I have improved my tools and I do not regret it. I do more and better with them.
The best camera... is the one you already own. The camera may not be the problem... it's the photographer. I have 5-6 cameras that I purchased used. I also have vintage lenses and I enjoy shooting manually with the old glass. Thanks for the video Rick.
That is not always the case: the one I own is broken and I wish I had a new working one. Am I being superficial? ;o) But you are right if I add 5-6 cameras, even purchased used, my problem would be solved.
The global shutter is meant for sports photographers. The global shutter doesn't mean any given frame will be better - it means that you're more likely to get a better set of images to choose from. (Yes, I've shot sports professionally for many years, and have sometimes missed the perfect shot because I wasn't fast enough.) It's still really expensive, but will get cheaper over time
Totally agree! Is not the gear who make you an excelent photographer. Is your KNOWLEDGE OF LIGHT AND EXPERIENCE MAKING PHOTOGRAPHS!
After using the 5D III for several years, I wanted to go mirrorless cause I saw other photographers going that way and felt like I needed to as well. So, I bought a Fuji XT-5. While I love the Fuji and tested several Sony mirrorless cameras…something felt off, like something was missing. A couple days ago I ended up buying a 5D IV, 85mm 1.2 II, and 70-200mm 2.8 and whatever I felt was missing using mirrorless, is not missing when shooting with an older DSLR. Using my 5D IV feels like HOME. There’s just something about that camera that helps me see the magic in photography again. My friends think I’m silly for not buying a Sony mirrorless, but I don’t even care cause I’m very content with what I have.
It is called habit and it does not mean it is all good ;o). But if it feels right for you, stay with it.
Completely agree. It’s not paint brush, it’s the painter. Plus a lot of UA-camrs are making commission from the latest gear and most of them don’t make anything
Glad i saw this video, i figured id like to delve into some photography, so i looked on Ebay and found a Nikon D3200 camera with a Nikon AF-S 18-135 lens about 11 years older, i know it is an entry level camera but im not starting out as a professional, so after learning some basics on how to set up and use the camera i took some close-up pictures outside in my backyard at some garden flowers, omg to my surprise i did not expect them to come out so clear, so this video at the least confirms you can get quality pictures from the older models, difference is the newer models have more bells n whistles, thank you for your post
Thank you for this gem of a video. One of the best I have ever watched. Not only do you address the key concern I had when I searched for the best camera for my daughter, but you went into the spiritual and human side of the art of photography and videography. The part about how we need challenges, the idea of diminishing returns, imposter syndrome…… You hit on some deep truths about our insecurities and fears and how the big corporations capitalize off of them. Bravo my friend. Brilliant
For sure, if you are a bad photographer, even with the best gear, you still stay like that. As always say to my students, first let's study the user manual of your camera, second, let's go outside to use it. That's it. Great video Rick.
Thanks, appreciate it!
I stopped buying new camera and lenses 5 years ago, my Canon eos r for my photpgraphy and Canon m6 mkii for vlogging has done me proud, I know these cameras inside out and also know my lenses and what I use them for.
This video is something I have told people on my workshops for such a long time.
Wildlife photography is an entirely different matter.. I would say for static subjects you are correct.. However when you have extremely challenging lighting conditions shooting a subject moving very quickly at a distance having the fastest up to date a camera with the best dynamic range makes a big difference..
As a real estate photographer you also benefit from the latest tech.
@jos_t_band3912 my M50 and 11-22 is 5 years old and still dynamite for real estate. You do not need the latest for real estate at all
I shoot sport which has similar demands to wildlife.
I shoot on an M50 mark II with some decent lenses.
I compare my shots with our clubs professional photographer and for the most part, the quality is on par.
Composition is more important (unless you are shooting in extremely poor lighting).
People were shooting NBA matches or English Premier League matches on DSLR's with less than 10fps with great results.
Skill trumps tech any day. Tech is one of those "nice to have, but not quite necessary" kind of scenarios
While I can agree that the newest tech updates are certainly beneficial to wildlife photographers getting more captures, I wonder if like this video said, whether things are becoming too easy. Is it much of an accomplishment if you simply can point an extremely high megapixel camera with a long lens in the direction of an animal and then hold the shutter down? At that point someone can essentially let the AI autofocus of the super computer in our hands take over, and they can easily reframe in post. Again, while I'm certain this will result in more keepers at the end of a day, I'm not sure if it's a good thing. Not to sound like a luddite!
@@thetoyota86perspective54that’s a crop sensor camera. Full frame at 15/16mm is the way to go for RE.
From a practical point of view, I found that upgrading to the Canon R5 in 2020 helped overcome some of the limitations of getting older - it gave me better subject tracking, bright, detailed display, a flippy screen, lighter weight, IBIS, the ability to see all my settings at a glance in the viewfinder. I don't think it makes photography "easier" so much as making it more convenient and more fun. These upgrades also allow me to focus my senior mind on the stuff that matters - composition, light, and timing - and not on fussing with my equipment. But I do agree that you can "get the shot" with almost any modern gear, or even some less modern gear, if you want to work that hard.
100 agree on IBIS. Amazingly effective.
Finally someone said this. My R6ii allows me to focus on framing and other techniques by merit of having the whole frame in its AF area - a far cry from my old 5D3 which had me worried about technical this, technical that.
Yes, techniques are important, but if the tech is holding you back from thinking of the techniques, then the tech is not helping.
I Bought used: Nikon D810 - 36mp & D600 - 24mp, both for £725, both very low Shutter counts..
100% on spot l have telling people this for years. I fell into the trap of buying new Nikons ever two years, think I would improve. I was even taught better while I was a university photo major.
The I saw the mirrorless train. But I did not get on. I was very happy with my D850. But I never sold my old gear, D800, D750, D80 , D3100 and D500. Not to mention film gear going back to 50s. I started spending all my time just taking 1000s of photos. And I started to see improvement in my work. I even take my old cameras out.
Manufacturers only want to sell more. I know this because I spent 30 years I all aspects of retail. Sales on up to ownership. Great post.
thanks
All very true points I think. Cameras are becoming like mobile phones I feel. People think they need the latest all the time. I also agree that having a challenge is important. I shoot on a 20 year old Canon SLR as well as a 5 year old DSLR. While technically the Digital images are better, nothing beats the feeling of getting my film scans back and seeing how I’ve nailed my compositions. It’s so much more rewarding.
Camera sales arent even that great . Seems like people are just talking and bashing without actually buying and working with them. Companies are just saving money by having all these guys on youtube market for them instead of doing paid commercials and ads.
That's a fantastic analogy, thanks Sarah. I don't think I've paid any attention to the new phone releases in recent years because of it (although I did buy last years but that's because my existing phone got run over.... long story!).
technically 35mm film has a higher resolution than most cameras depending on how you scan... film has not been made obsolete by digital sensors it's a different way to the same result
One of the things I loved so much as a kid (Im 36) was shooting film. My grandmother gave me access to basically limitless blank film so i shot whatever i wanted as often as i wanted. the excitement of digging through the results to see what you got was part of the mystery. digital is cool, but i wish i still had one of my cheap childhood cameras or her ancient minolta tto shoot actual film again
You realise that if you scan and do not tiny in a darkroom you are going digital anyway. The difference is you and your attitude, process depending on the tools you use. You should be able to fix that with a little discipline ;o)
The idea that a camera that released 4-5 years ago is dated is insane to me. Sometimes I feel I'd quite like to update my Sony A6000 but the image quality is still so good it's impossible to justify blowing £1k+ just for a few better features.
the 5Dii is still to this day the most used Studio Camera in the world... pretty much says it all... image quality really hasn't changed in the last 15 years... sure cameras got some new bells and whistles... but 99.9% of them you never use
@@LoFiAxolotlMainly the tech got smaller and lighter.
I agree. Take that money and go on a trip.
@@LoFiAxolotlthat is because most pro photographers struggle to make a living.
exactly i bought the EV-10 , which is like the same camera for the most part..
Old DSLR is the best Bang for your buck for Photohraphy.
No you went too down, stay in mirrorless zone
I disagree.
Best bang for the buck is MIRRORLESS. Spend more on the body.......and save many times that amount using older/vintage lenses.
@@martyzielinski1442any recommendations for a budget of about 1k? I’m interested in landscape photography.
My new brother from another mother , opened my eyes and my mind . Ton's of love ❤ you BRO. my best wishes for your bright future... Thank you so much
I don't know... I feel like my move from the Nikon D610 to the Sony A7 IV really felt like a leap that really increased the quality of work.
Agreed
Haha I have the d610 and bought a used Sony a7ii and I love it so far. But my nikon d610 is still amazing.
I went from a d600 to a lumix S5 and didn't notice any progression in terms of photos but definitely in terms of shooting film.
Great video Rick, and many thanks for the feature 😊 8:05 - my trusty 7 year old Canon 5D IV, 13 year old 70-300L & 10 year old 24-70L lenses are still my go to bits of kit! Still plenty of life and potential left in them for the photography I enjoy.
This also reminds me of a quote I saw (apologies I can’t remember the author), something like…
Beginners worry about gear,
Amateurs worry about settings,
Professionals worry about light (or as my friend better described it - the ‘moment’)
It’s not what you have, it’s what you do with it that counts.
This said, I do understand the benefit some photographers / videographers will get from the cutting edge bits of kit, and if it helps elevate their craft beyond the sake of just having the latest thing then go for it!
😊
Thanks again Chris. Agree with all that - love that quote!
Good quote !
D700 since 2010, added a D850 a year or so back. I don't see any reason to sell it all for a mirrorless setup as it all works perfectly. I don't need the speed of the new cameras to capture landscape photos. If the mountains start moving that fast I've got bigger problems than capturing an image...
Learn everything you can about what you already own and use it...
Great video, appreciate your candor, subscribed and signed up for your newsletter.
Same here, both amazing cameras, D850 has video, both well built and good handling, plus the lenses are probably more important.
F mount lenses are great deals, now that z lenses are out.
I've recently got a Sony A7 III for a year, while my Nikon D3400 has unimpressive video features it's still a great camera for photography.
@@jrt2792 at present time I’m not a videographer thus not a really big concern, nothing against those that do. However I realize a lot of still photographs are transitioning to video…
Perhaps someday I’ll investigate video, I’ve done little bits on my iPhone but that’s the extent of it.
Well, for landscape and nature not all can travel 50 times in one location. Time is money, light and conditions can change quickly. Mirrorless setups can be considerably lighter with a lot better stabilization. This allows to shoot more handheld. Basicly after the "main" subjects you can focus on more stuff, which often can be overlooked.
Thanks, appreciate it!
Thanks!
Thank you for sharing, definitely good to know. Thanks Rick 😊
I started using film with a Minolta SRT-101. When film is your medium, you either improve your skills or waste money on film/processing. Over the years I moved up through Nikon F2 gear, Nikonos, Mamiya and Bronica 645 and Pentax 6x7. I FINALLY gave in to digital in 2013 with what I thought was a reasonably worthy substitute, Sony NEX-7. Acquired an a7C last year. Through it all, it really comes down Great glass for sharp images, a solid body that allows me to select the proper Shutter/Aperture to get the image I am looking for. It’s your experience and the artistic abilities you’ve honed that make the image. While the economics of Digital cannot be beat, Ultimately, I still love the look and depth of images shot on film.
I started with a Pentax K1000. I went Minolta AF (D7 and D9) when I did a lot of horseracing, still do a bit of that. I only went digital when the Sony A900s came out. I have good Minolta G glass, some of which is pretty old by modern standards. I got a 99 Mk 2 when they came out which is even better than the 900s which I still use for a lot of things, and I don't see any need to upgrade at all beyond that. I'm done with upgrades.
Great video and wise words. I do astrophotography and a little general photography with canon 600D which is astro modified. Because the canon is modified the quick autofocus feature doesnt work anymore because the IR UV filter was removed and replaced with a different one. So for the past 2 months I've been thinking of getting a newer camera but didn't decided which brand to take and now after I watched your video you made it all clear to me what to aim for. Besides the canon I was obsessed at getting the best astro dedicated cameras and realized that it's just not worth it. Recently this year I produced my best astro image so far by just improving my technique and not buying better cameras or filters.
Glad to hear it, keep going!
I use the same setup with the sky-watcher evoguide 50ed scope. It gives amazing results. The Canon T3i is still a great and fun camera to use. Heck, I still use my Canon Rebel Ti film camera.
It's a fun marketing concept to have the latest Sony A7R5 in your hands and to tell others don't do like me... in any case it works, it even brings in a record number of views!
Good game ! You see, you too are good at marketing strategy!
All you have to do is put your point of view into practice and even add more for the next video. I'm sure you can get 1 million views with it: I sold my Sony A7R5 to buy a Canon 500D and I feel much better.
And then your marketing plan becomes grandiose! Magnificent !
I absolutely agree. You go to any camera shop and they will show cameras with massive iso ranges, 20fps etc... all about speed. I found the perfect camera for me in the Fuji x-pro 2.. All the reviews agree, it's a slow camera. This is a brilliant feature! It give time to think and compose, just like using old film cameras. The quality of my images has improved massively since I traded in my top of the range Nikon gear..
You've said it perfectly ! It's not easy to explain why photography should be a (slightly at least) difficult craft without soundikg like you are gatekeeping... great video !
One of my biggest flaws in my videography journey was looking for the fastest lens with the best low light camera to get good images in less-than-ideal situations. Then one day I bought a tiny portable light, and even at 25% if its brightness, i realized I could have saved hundreds and hundreds by just lighting properly.
It’s still nice to have usable footage at high ISOs, but using good lighting and hitting native ISOs will always produce a better image.
Exactly, with a good lighting you can produce the best image with most lenses out there
I went mad on getting F1.4/1.8 primes for low light wherever I could. I then tried a F4 24 to 105 and was blown away with it. I now use that and a F4 70-200mm IS 99% of the time. My F2.8 70-200mm sits there. Less obsession = More fun!
@@jabezhane it’s funny how things come full circle. I’ve been looking at the 24-105 f/4 or f/2.8. I sold my RF 24-105 back in 2020 thinking that good primes would be better. They ARE better for indoors, but not nearly as versatile.
Hello Rick. I can't thank you enough for this video. I love photography and I am very new at it and it is very easy to get caught in the latest and greatest without developing the skill set once needs to become and master the skill set to understand how photography works and for me at least what type of photography I want to do. You got yourself a new subscriber. Cheers.
I agree completely. When I started building a recording studio, I wanted the best gear to be professional. Now, 20 years later, I can make pro recordings with the bare essentials. That’s not to say great equipment doesn’t help, but experience trumps gear in my experience. In audio or video, subject and presentation is the determining factor.
I've learned that you pick and choose which great equipment to pick up first.
This is so true. Nice message. A good photographer will take good photos with a cheap point and shoot.
I tried the new kit and ended up selling everything and just using an original 5d for hobby shooting and a mk2 for work. There’s something about the early cameras that look very filmic compared to the new clinical look. For video I just picked up a £400 pocket 4k off mpb. Couldn’t be happier as the older gear makes you work for the result which gives more of an accomplishment feeling when it comes out great.
People valued the specs, cherish the final product but completely forgot the joy of taking a picture. If a blurry picture, which was taken while you were giggling, brings you the happy memory everytime you see it, it's the good photo. I remember the first time I hold a DSLR, it's a 3 digits canon model (550d or 600d), the joy of hearing the shutter click, the slight vibration when the mirror flip, couldn't be replicated. Later I was drugged by "1 digit canon" people, who said APSC canon is not enough, it's the main reason which is holding you back from taking a nice picture, they I sold my good old camera (with all of the lenses) for an used 5d mark 2 (which is a small fortune for a collegue student back then). But I can't produce any stunning photo. Then people said the 50mm is not enough, you need a 35, 85mm Sigma Art lens. Over and over again, I fell into a trap of buying new things with a false promise that I will take a better photo. But then it hit me when I buy the first MF lens, which is the industar (with star bokeh) and a Helios 44-3, I realized that actually my brain is the only thing which is holding me back and sadly it cannot be upgraded or replaced. With the MF lens, I actually have to think a lot to take a photo, then the stunning image started to show up. Now I understand that no gear or equipment is necessary to make good photo, it completely relies on your hand and your heart. Close your heart to it, then you can take a soulful picture.
How do you know what "people" cherish? Forget? Find joy in? On the other hand you are right it is the photographer who should make the decisions and be responsible for his/her photographs, the gear is just a tool to help reach one's goals. Different goals, different tools though.
I still love to shoot with my 2009 12MP Nikon D3S. Last week I bought a mirrorless to try and I don't like it as much as my old D3s.
That's interesting - as I alluded to, I'd keep using the camera I like to shoot with most
I've watched this great video 3 times...I needed to hear this as I've strongly considered moving from Fuji to Sony...a huge cost switch...but really there is no need. Thank you!
These are mature words. I'm 29 year old. Got my first camera when I was 22, it was a Nikon d7200 which I've loved. Let me tell you that I regret selling that camera so much after I've purchased the Sony A7 III. He is right in this video. Modern cameras have lost their soul in a way that it steals the joy of challenge and pursuit. Everything is far too easy . Today I've purchased a 35mm GM 1.4 while I already have a 35 2.8, 28-75 2.8 and an 85mm 1.8. I've realised that the only factor that is limiting my skills is myself and not the gear. If you are struggling with gear acquisition remember that your skills will not improve by getting more gear. I've canceled the order of the 35 in the same day I've bought it. It felt so liberating and I was really empowered to push myself further with what I already have ! Trust yourself my friend. Don't listen to all reviews on UA-cam. Everybody is trying to make some money by pushing reviews on products you just don't need ! What you need is some discipline and to educate yourself in whatever you're trying to achieve. Good luck
What you can't see in images from older/lesser gear is the missed pictures. Removing the technical barriers let's photographers concentrate on where and when to point the camera, which is where the art part starts.
I don’t know, Kevin… I often think about my Nikon D3. I don’t remember a situation when I ever thought “man, I missed a great shot, I wish I had a newer camera”. In fact, I don’t think that I ever missed a shot with it. Either a D3 can make the photo, or conditions are so terrible that no camera will.
@romansivers This really depends upon what sort of photography one is doing. I started photographing birds with a camera that had several AF points and blazed away at three frames per second. Birds change poses faster than I could keep up. Now, with full-screen AF and high frame rate, my composition is better because i can frame the bird and the background. And I am getting all the interesting head and tail positions. There are lots of tech improvements that allow us to concentrate on things that matter to us.
I kind of get this, but the missed pictures to me are a huge part of the learning experience. It's one of the things that adds to our photographic growth. Plus, most of my 'missed pictures' are down to my own ineptitude...
I knew exactly what this video was going to be about before clicking on it, and still watched it. I'm sure someone needs to hear this.
I fully agree with this but I do think it depends on the type of photography you do. For example if you are a studio shooter of a photographer that simply has the luxury of time to dial in settings and focus then I can say it doesn’t matter what gear you use. But something like wedding photography I’d say your camera matters more to an extent. Good autofocus, fps, dynamic range, low light performance are features that newer cameras would have and benefit a wedding photographer greatly in consistently capturing more great moments in limited time
Almost any camera from the last 5 years will do the job. I've shot weddings and engagements with 2 x M50 bodies and a Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sigma 56mm f1.4
The clients loved the results
As a hobbyist that shoots & loves fujifilm, I love everything about this video. I also love using gear that makes me want to pick it up and use it everyday/everywhere. Thank you.
Great to hear, thanks!
I want to have a „clapping hands“ symbol in UA-cam to react on this video instead of the boring „thumbs up“. Thank you, thank you, thank you for this statement. Absolutely right. Stop runnning and start enjoying our great passion „photografy“ slowly…😊
Thanks!
Think I may have ended any hope of a collab with a camera company anytime soon 😬😬
😀
Fear not. You should make your work about cheap photography. That's your niche.
They dont pay well, I dont think its worth while to pursue that. This makes you a real person. That matters more.
@@drftrkjhguvgggfd cheap? He calls cameras from 2014-2019 worth 300-1000$ on the 2nd hand market "old"...
I shot from 2015-2021 with a Canon EOS 550D i bought 2nd hand for 70€. THAT was old as i got rid of it!
And except for basic stuff, GEAR MATTERS. For example only as i got a Canon EOS RP and a RF 800 F11 lens i could catch some wildlife photography experience.... EOS 550D + old 75-300 IS USM was absolutely garbage for that kind of stuff and it took me multiple months to get my first "usable" and good shot (manual focus mainly due to bad AF motors in cheap lens and bad AF in old entry level body, on top even misaligned AF sensors...)
One week with the EOS RP and RF 800 F11 and i had like 10 "good" shots without much hassle.
Astrophotography, another thing which was literally impossible on my 2nd hand, budget, bad tracking telescope due to the need of 4-8 minutes exposure time (ISO 800 on 550D), with the EOS RP (ISO 6400 best setting) i can decrease exposure time to 30-60 seconds, where this old, messed up equatorial mount keeps up good enough. Also, since i have a 750mm telescope, APS-C (1200mm) was too tight for most stuff anyways, even 750mm with Full Frame is still somewhat annoying (too tight for california nebula, andromeda galaxy etc...)
Who cares about collaborating and lying to mass media as opposed to saving your soul and being honest to consumers? I’ll wait.
Great video Rick. Modern APSC camera’s definitely hold up in most situations and save you loads of money when it comes to lenses. A lot depends on what your shooting.
In photography light n shadow is key. A camera is a tool, lens determines how far you are from the subject and what you intend to capture. Low apertures lens allow you to shoot in poor lighting, however shooting at a low aperture one must inst Dane dept of field and focal plane. If you are shooting at night at a low aperture and only certain parts of your subject in focus then you have focus stack. Key to photography is seeing the shot before you.take it, when you see it you will know what lens to use and what lighting you want. The most important thing is light then comes shadow that creates depth then lens then camera to capture it.
Started with an Olympus OM10 and moved to canon and Now Using a Small Sony A6400. Been worried that I could not go for a A6700 because I needed IBIS and 4K 60. Your video helped a lot to capture more with the existing A6400
I own a Fujifilm X-T4 and XF 100-400 mm and I use it for wildlife photography. The autofocus, on 35%of the cases is all over the place. I was thinking to move to OM System or to Canon but my question is: Would I get at least 90% sharp photos to compensate for the extra cash that I will have to spend?
Fujifilm known for af performance issues for a decade i have Om system E-M1 Mark 3 and Sony a7iv for wildlife and Macro photography i can safety say for taking Macro shots OM system has huge advantage even in wildlife espically animal portrait and bird photography OM system has advantage because of shallow depth of field and 2x crop factor i'm going to use these 2 systems for at least five years i'm from Turkey cameras,lenses and other equipments are extremely expensive in here .
I got myself a d810 recently, it does everything I need and much more. Actually I think it's better than any of the mirrorless offerings for me because of the OVF and battery life.
??? have you ever used a mirrorless, a recent one? I doubt it. The EVF provides far more useful tools than an OVF (if only regarding exposure). Yes, mirrorless consume more power but usually two batteries will (and should) cover the day, so just take an extra battery and enjoy the pluses of EVFs ;o)
I completely agree. There’s more fulfillment in the process than owning gear. I managed to bag myself a pocket 6k, shot a few short films and started landing gigs I could never imagine myself having before. It is the purpose that really matters and not necessarily the gear .
Great work, and so true 🙏🏻
A very good video again! Thanks.
While I know gear certainly won't make me a better photographer, I know why I buy it: I'm a tech nerd and I love high tech. Plus I can't blame gear for the bad photos I take, It's all my fault.
And we can't deny that photography is an art highly related to gear.
Thanks Gabriel. I get that, I'm a bit of a tech nerd too!! Great that you can be honest with yourself as people struggle with that - I certainly have in the past.
It is highly related to gear up to a point. If you have a reasonably recent camera and lenses for the type of photography you like to do then upgrading to the latest and greatest gear isn't going to improve your photography to any significant degree. You'd probably have to pixel peep just to tell the difference between your new gear and your old gear. Maybe if you are a sports or wildlife shooter you might get more keepers with improved focus tracking and higher burst rates but in most situations you'd be hard pressed to show improvements in your photography with new gear even as far as just basic image quality goes. When it comes to composition or subject selection there'd be zero improvement. You'll still be the same photographer you were before, just with newer and fancier gear.
Tell this to my minolta srt303b.
Still using my Canon R6 for UA-cam and client work I’ve had since launch. Love it and know it inside out! Think it will last me another few years at least 👌
Totally agree. My 5Dmk3 is relatively old but is very solid even now. I still use my 60D sometimes, which is my very first camera, and it still gets the job done well enough. I've tried some recent mirroless cameras and i can see how big of a improvement it can be in terms of AF. However it's not going to change how the photo is framed, composition, what's the content of the photo and such. They can makes good photos better and easier sometimes. But can never make bad ones good. 90% of it is determined by the photographer while the gears are merely a tool. People can take extraordinary photos with their phones as well. Looking at photos from many years ago, art is not based on technology. Technology makes art easier and better in some ways, but never will be a deterministic factor.
I still use a Nikon D3S (a camera that was made in 2010) for my professional work in 2023. It's built like a tank and the only thing it can't do is shoot proper video. At 12MP, it's enough for just about any event coverage that I do. I've never met a client who complained about my image quality. For video as well as my 'higher' megapixel needs, I have my Nikon mirrorless on the side.
Rick, I agree with a lot of what you're saying. That said, did I really "need" the Sony A7RV? Yes and no. I am turning 70 in 5 months, wear glasses and have shaky hands. The A7RV's autofocus and IBIS make my life so much easier. It's an amazing camera for me.
But, oh man! It took a big chunk out of my budget. LOL
I think that highlights a great point. If there is something about your current kit that is truly limiting you (like a like of IBIS as you say), then it is worth upgrading 👍🏻
I've never used Sony, what's IBIS apart from a large wading bird?
When I bought my first Nikon dslr, the salesman who was quite old said to me " You are taking up a very costly hobby" I couldn't understand what he meant that time. But now I understand why these manufacturers trick us to buy newer models just by adding a little extra improvement on the older model. Same with the lens manufacturers. I couldn't find huge difference between a 50 mm f1.8 and a costly 50 f1.4 lens.
on the flip side, i never understood what people mean with this ''its so expensive'' crap. photography does not need to be expensive AT ALL. get a used camera body for like 200-400 bucks. stock up on a couple vintage prime lenses for pennies and start creating. i mean, you can even get something like a d700 for under 200$ sometimes.
what i have noticed quite often is that there is a huge gap between photographers and creators and ''gear collectors''
if you go by the locig that just owning a camera and pressing a button makes one a photographer, than everyone in the world is a photographer because everyones phone has a camera. unfiltered truth however: probably 90% of people owning a camera have absolutely zero creative talent whatsoever and just point a camera somewhere and press a button. wich creates a quite interesting scenario:
if you dont have any creative talent and just take snapshots of random stuff like you dont even need a good camera for, then the gear you re using doesnt matter anyways because the photos you put out are not great regarless. on the flipside you can put whatever camera into the hands of a photographer who has some sort of talent and they will produce some nice photos with it.
i have seen this countless times. back then those ''dads with money'' buying fancy canons with L Glass and when you look at their photos you kind of cringe to a point you re asking yourself why they waste so much money on camera equipment. and those people are the ones constantly discussing and bragging about tech and camera specs and buying new gear and ... bro... you have no feel of color or lighting, you dont understand compositions, you have no creative ideas and your ''skill'' in postproduction makes the photos even worse (remember those portrait photos from people who slap gaussian blur on peoples skin so that they look like some weird abstract wax figures? put some fancy glow effect on top and voila... yeah those types) it quite literally does not matter if that person buys new gear or whatnot. you cant buy yourself creativity and talent.
its the same like with other crafts. there are carpenters who build incredible unique furniture. yeah, i can buy the same tools those craftsman use, but i still have no clue what to do with them and cant even put a simple shelf onto the wall
Great video, very true, practice practice practice. I’m using a Nikon D5500, and still learning by doing.
Thanks. That was time well spent.
Thank you.
I think most people know this, but like any other gear purchase, most are just looking for excuses when they hit a creative block or lack photography skills to begin with. Its partially subconscious but some people just buy new gear and are unwilling to accept or spend time to get better.
I have taken photos for six years and I still haven't bought a firsthand camera or something that is less than 3 years from launch, because aside from some niche situations, its still obvious that the bottleneck is myself and not the camera. Aside from a workable AF, IBIS/OIS, and decent ergonomics, almost everything else is fluff. A trained photographer with an a6000 will still take massively better pictures than the guy with an a9 that upgrades every year.
And some, when they get to a financial block, look for an excuse to convince themselves to listen to reason (finances). It may sound like a little tongue in cheek but there is some truth to it ;O) ...look at this video again with that angle.
its the same as when they try to promote bigger tvs with higher res, where as many times you find yourself watching a 720 content or documentary for hours and its just fine.
In my opinion the lenses matter even more. Because lenses are also dropping nowadays like flies, it would have been great to ask which lenses were taken with each photographers, to see how well some lenses age, and how timeless some lenses can be. Thanks for the video.
Seriously
You are just absolutely right.. i stand by you.😊
I’m still rocking a used Nikon D4. Great dynamic range, AF and speed. I can’t see any need to go mirrorless any time soon.
True!!! thank you Rick for the info.
well, the one or few things camera companies dont tell you is how much they hire people to promote themselves as VIDEO cameras while using Photos samples to claim the camera gets great bokeh etc etc, camera mode on DSLR or Mirrorless requires yu flip the shutter twice the amount of your frame rate, this is a huge difference between photo and Camera modes., its crazy to think its something to ignore, your seen great photos thinking wow, I can vlog with this but its not true and even once you set it up to video you realise you need a full frame if cropped or another lens..
@@mikehunt576 yes indeed, honestly I don’t trust much of reviews, the real life use is way different
Another great video, Rick. I recently upgraded my kit to the Nikon Z6ii. Before that I was very happy with my Nikon D5600. In terms of picture quality and features, it is a hard camera to beat for landscape folks on a budget. As I was getting better, I was liking a few aspects of the mirrorless world and was wanting the addition of weather sealing. I could’ve bought an older DSLR with weather sealing but figured I would “future proof” myself a little bit and plan to keep the Z6 for quite some time as it has everything (probably more) that I need. I always think of it as gear doesn’t matter until you are limited in some aspect.
Again, Rick, great series look forward to the next one. 👏🏻👏🏻
Thanks Andy, appreciate you keeping on coming back and commenting! Yep, that totally makes sense. Love that - "gear doesn't matter until you are limited in some aspect". Hits the nail on the head.
I actually like the challenge of shooting one frame each time I press the shutter. One. Shooting too many frames per second only makes editing more frustrating. It's overwhelming to compare minute differences between frames. To me, anyway, it takes the fun away.
OMG this. I hate having more than 3/4 shots of the same thing. Used to spend my life endlessly culling photos!!
Exactly it becomes something reductionist which takes all the beauty out of the art away. The idea that you’re just performing trial and error until the camera basically gets the right photo is so cheap to me.
And it challenges you to become more present and decisive, like spearing a fish, not trowing a web
if I shoot 3 frames I think I'm shotgunning
xes, spray nd pray vs. 'the 'decicuve moment' ala CB,. wIse words drom Rick.
bIy mnt used on ebay, wth a-z guarantee. 5-6MP can be enough, 40 plus, is overkill.ccd, ok,too.
Something worth mentioning in favor of higher-end gear is the human factor. Specifically inspiration and commitment. Learning photography is hard. I bought a cheap (but good) point-and-shoot with full manual capabilities to learn on. I tried and gave up. Too hard. A few years later I spent many hundreds on a DSLR and good zoom lens. I was inspired to learn and, after spending all that money, I felt committed to stick with it. I am happy I did as I am well on my way. My photos aren't much better than the point-and-shoot but now I know what I am doing and I enjoy it much more. You make good points but you also come across jaded. You do say true things but what other true things didn't you say?
I totally agree with you. One thing I would like to ad is: I would like it when more cameras would be made only for video or photography. I think all the compromise that is done on hybrids is giving us less than more.
I am a photographer. The newest cameras are just tools like they were 100 years ago they just make the work easier. Don’t expect the pictures to jump right off the screen.
This is new true come on dude
The biggest photography ripoff of all time is convincing people to pay up to 50% more for mirrorless camera bodies and lenses that in some cases are the same quality or only a slight increase from DSLRs.
England produces the best philosophers.
Uh, excuse us, did you forget Bevis and Butthead???
I came from a Full frame Canon and after an accident in the ocean I bought a Fujifilm XT-3 and love it !! You cannot BUY talent, whether it's golf clubs, guitars, cameras or whatever, you're right in that be content with what you have and learn from what you have
LOVE YOUR HONESTY....Thank you for the inspiration
At last, a young photographer who has seen the light. I have been a photographer , one time pro, for over 45 years, nearly 60 years from the time I picked up my first Instamatic. Although I still shoot film in all formats including 4X5 and 5X7, for over twenty years I have shot digital. The digital cameras of today are just imaging computers. They are not cameras. The sensor records a scene ( sensor is an analogue device BTW, not digital ), sends the voltage generated to the ADC and the very powerful computers inside the camera start to work on the data. It is then ' reassembled ' and displayed as a ' photograph' on the LCD and recorded to the card. We have already seen the implementation of AI noise reduction in camera. AI does not reduce noise, it re-renders a scene pixel by pixel, and produces something based on the original data. AI assisted focusing? What on earth is that? It sounds to me that if the camera misses focus, it is quicker for it to re-render a ' sharpened ' frame than to try and refocus mechanically. All in all, I view all these as irrelevant features to the art of photography. Not for me. I stick to my Leica M film and Digital cameras . Others may have different opinions.
It's been a while since I've been described as 'young', so thanks for that!! 'Imaging computers'... that's so true. I agree with all of that though. The AI nonsense has just pushed it too far for me - when did we start calling anything with a chip in it 'AI powered'?!
Spoken by a man wearing a 100 dollar ballcap and shooting on the latest and greatest! But not for us peon's!
Its not just this channel but I am kind of tired of all these UA-cam photographers saying hey you do not need the latest and greatest yet they all have the latest and greatest. Lately I have been gravitating to photographers that are actually shooting with gear that most of us can afford. It is nice to see them actually get nice images with kit that I can afford. Examples are Henry Turner, Chris Baitson, David Flower, Joshua Peg and the amazing work of D Griff. Most of these photographers actually make it a point to shoot on "normal" gear to show what you can get and yes it proves that gear does not matter but they are actually showing it. Now this is not to get on Rick or this channel as it is good but yeas I agree with dduster1167 on this.
@@rickmower1136 so it would make you feel better if people look poor and act poor before they tell you common sense and save you money? At the end of the day all these new hybrid cameras in like the last 3 years do about 99% of the same shit and no one can tell the difference from the finished product. How you get there might vary slightly but if you expose properly or use lighting, they are basically indistinguishable.
Fair points 👍🏻
I think when you are working professionally (and video work is my job), then it's a bit different. You wouldn't be happy if a taxi driver picked you up in a banged up Vauxhall Astra for example. If clients are putting their trust in me, I want something that I have zero doubts about and is going to work no matter what. The majority of the photo UA-cam audience aren't professionals which is why I think the message is valid. That's why I thought it was important to show images taken on older kit, and why I showed images I took on a camera that can be picked up for a lot less now. I realise that it cost me more at the time, but like I said towards the end - I genuinely would go back to using older 'normal' kit (and may even do so next year).
I'm not going to take hate on the hat though, it was a gift!!
@@RayValdezPhotography So your second point I agree with you. The first comment I am not sure why you made it, I said nothing about being poor or if it would make me feel better. Just an observation that this keeps happening with photographers saying gear does not matter but to them it does. Sure it is a message about common sense (that good) but they don't practice what they preach. Shoot with what ever you like and feels right to you, I just choose to follow the work of people that are humble with the gear they have and produce great work.
@@RickBebbington Thanks for the response and I do appreciate the message. I was not trying to bash on you directly but just pointing out that this is pretty common theme with some youtube photographers. You are professional and you made a great point on the need for your kit and how it works for you. Keep up the great work.
Hello Rick, I just subscribed to your channel. I'm a beginner in both videography and photography. Thank you for giving tips like this; it will help me better understand the world of cameras.
You Got It! I even got to the point a well known local news station. They taking my photos for news and web site. They thought i was using great camera gear. Well it was a $200 cell phone! I have tons of stories like that. " Great camera gear does not mean great photos "
Rick, I own an entry level DSLR (a Nikon d3400) that I've been using for years as a hobby and recently for architecture photography as a business . I want to get into fine art photography too, and as I understand will need to de able to do big prints in the future. What would be a good choice to upgrade from my camera to enter in this market?
Great video btw!!
I agree, in spite of the fact that I bought a new mirrorless camera last year. I didn’t need it. I do love it though. Some of the best photos I took last year were on 40 year old 35mm cameras.
Awesome, honest video… I’ve been thinking on “upgrading” my a7 Iv to a 7R cuz I need to print out to a very large format.. I use the camera exclusively to photograph my artwork.. do you think I can achieve the same quality with the a7iv resolution?? Thanks
Hard to say without knowing the size and seeing it in print. It's worth testing before you upgrade, and maybe even exploring the super-resolution type features in Lightroom and Photoshop that may give you what you are after. Good luck!
Im on a Canon R6 for a few years now, Tamron 70-200, Sigma 50mm, and I just got an old Canon EF 24-70mm. Fighting all the time the temptation to get RF lenses. At the end of the day, im just a dad who loves photography and mostly does sports (any sport the kids at playing at the moment)
I love your honesty. As you become more experienced. You'll realise that it's the skill and not so much the equip.
Started by looking at the a7Siii. And I continuously asked questions and looked for unbiased videos and I ended up getting a pre-owned a6100. I am happy that we get honest videos like this. thank you.