We've been doing something similar to this in live touring sound and analog studios for years. We basically return all of our global effects, less inserted effects, to open channels, then assign the channel out to either the L/C/R Master Out or to an open subgroup, then to the master out. The technique works well because it gives us much greater control of the signal i.e. Gain, EQ, Compression, etc. than when using the effects return knob. Which is very limited and requires a painful amount of setup in each individual effect processor, which is difficult to change on the fly. It's a good idea to use in Reason for the same reasons we use it and because it does save on CPU usage as opposed to inserting an effect or effects on each channel for more control. Good video.
Thank you.Ive been racking my brain lately to get this right. I can bus the efx bus into a pre stereo bus. I like to do some dynamics control before the stereo bus. Awesome job!
Brilliant, thanks. It took me a while to realise why I was getting a delay on the send effects. It was latency, I changed audio driver and the setup worked perfectly. So if anyone else gets the effects a beat behind, check that.
+William Harper thanks Will! I'll say that Reason gets pretty frustrating when you've got sessions with a lot of tracks, so I wouldn't get rid of the old daws just yet.
@1:26 you can combine the first effect you create, and chain effects inside the combinator to avoid the connection to the second send effect. If you don't like the combinator, you can always remove it at the end :) @4:06 If you wanna make the return knob works, you can connect the DIRECT OUT of the individual mixes channel to the Mixer FX Return IN. In alternative you can use the Parallel OUT but you will double the fx signal i think :p BTW good content :). Good luck with your channel!
That's an interesting title, as there is really no right or wrong way to do it. It's a matter of preference as we've seen in the past comments. This technique reminds me of the old analog days for boards that had limited FX returns. We would just use one of the monitor aux sends to an extra FX box and ran it into an unused channel on the board. That worked great live, because you could easily mute the FX when someone needs to just talk to the crowd. Thanks for the video!
It's definitely the old school way, but I think it's more "right" to do, because I find it easier organizationally, and unlocks additional power (like you can send sends).
I've been doing this in other DAWs, however, in Reason there is no solo defeat/isolate to keep from muting the EFX when you solo other channels. I've been asking for that option strictly for routing fx to mix(er) channels... since forever.
How do we address the delay caused by this? If you run the reverb 100% dry and trigger a snare hit, you can hear there is a maybe 30 ms differentiation between the snare mix channel and the FX master channel. This delay does not occur when you use the default FX returns on the master rack.
cool video, but question, you didn't connect the direct outputs of the mix channels into the fx returns. is that not supposed to be connected? or what is difference between connecting or not connecting to fx returns?
Great tips and technique, thanks! It's quite similar to the way Reggae dub effects are used. You can even apply the effect on itself and create feedback
First of all: good tutorial, thanks. I followed every step but there is a BIG problem. There is a Delay added that the "delay comp" button can't solve. Is it only me ?
It is 100% accurate for every possible plugin out there. But it should work for hte vast majority. There are sample delay plugins out there you can use to manually set things, but they're a real pain.
Hey, bother. I appreciate you elucidating this alternate & superior approach within Reason. It allows you to get creative, doesn't it? Subscribed :). Also, you've got a great voice for narration, and I liked how you humbly asked for the subscribe. PEACE!
The way you do it is the obvious old school way but it has one huge drawback, there is no solo safe in Reasons mixer so if you solo a mix channel that is using a send effect you won't hear it. Of course you can then solo the fx bus but again that adds an extra step.
You're totally right Dennis! Hopefully Reason 10 adds a more feature-rich mute/solo section. During the mixing stage, I really prefer being able to control everything from the mixing board without having to drop back into the rack, which is why I think this send effect technique still has legs!
There’s really not an easy way. You can use parallel busses a bit, but ultimately, Reason only allows 8 send effects, so it’s not truly professional grade
@@StockMusicMusician Thanks you for your answer.indeed, I find it unfortunate that this daw does not give this possibility of having several shipments.
Hi, i have a question. In a blank template where I created 8 mix channels where I would put my effects. Now how can I assign my instruments such as kong or synthesizer to send effect from those mixed channels?
Evan. Thank you so much for your videos. I have returned to this one several times. One thing I haven't been able to do is at 5:14 which is to solo my effects. Whenever I hit solo, reason mutes the source canceling the signal to the effect. If I solo the source also, I hear the source and the effect. Am I doing something wrong? Would like to hear just the effect. I did get to this sweet spot by turning the volume on the source way down, but who wants to touch the faders once you have them set. I also am able to print the effect to an audio channel and then solo, but that is a lot of work and time. Any help is appreciated.
Scott what you describe is one of the shortcomings of the way sends are implemented in reason. I believe if you set the send effect to pre-fader, it still passes through when muted, but honestly, I don't like using pre-fader sends. To make up for this, I tend to boost the volume of my effects channels when I'm trying to dial them in.
Sweet method!! I've been looking for a way to solo FX channels. I know this video is from 5 years ago, so is latency still an issue with this method? I noticed lots of people complaining about that in the comments.
Glad it helped! And great question John - latency is no longer an issue (since Reason 10, I think), if you use the delay compensation button on the bottom right.
Couldn't you just hook up the combinators to the send/return to avoid the auto-route issues you mention in the beginning while still using them as sends on a per-channel basis?
This is an interesting method, but i have found that its easier to just load one Combinator with FX running directly from the RE to the sends bus and then Use A Parallel channel to add the FX too. The first reason this is good is that your parallel channel will already have EQ, filtering, compression, gating, and routing for your FX. The Second you don't end up changing your source while customizing your FX. This method gives you far more control, while not breaking the way the Reason deals with the FX sends. It also add interesting dynamics to what would be a flat sound.
I definitely see some those advantages. For me a lot also has to do with organization. I use parallel channels for a specific effect (like NY Compression or adding a touch of grit), but for broader filtering I find my method helpful just because I can see things at a glance on my larger projects.
@@StockMusicMusician to be honest I'm not sure how to do that I'm kinda embarrassed to say, I've been teaching myself this whole time so any bit of info helps thanks again man your vids are great and easy to follow :)
How is this different than making a normal reverb send, creating a parallel channel of the sound you want to process, to which you put the send effect and then process it with EQ as an insert on that parallel channel?
Because you can send multiple instruments to this reverb send and process everything the same AFTER the reverb (or before depending on the signal path on the send).
This method also works nicely if you are using your sends for headphone mixes. If you have your effects set up this way you just click the send that your separate headphone mix is on for each effect you want to hear in that headphone mix. It is great when you are tracking multiple players who all want there own headphone mix.
There's a problem here. If you do this, it will create a slap delay on the mix channel. I tried his and spoke to proellerhead. The plugins latency isn't corrected since it's is detected as unusual routing.
Hey so Jw could you do a video on setting up a screen capture program and how to record the audio from reason. I have an interface and sound flower. And want to use QuickTime, but my issue is that I can only seem to record the audio coming from the built in mic on my Mac
im getting a bit of a delay on the signal when i setup my sends like this. i cant find the delay compensation knob you speak of in one of your comments
I don't think they added delay compensation until Reason 8 or 9 or maybe even 10. If you're using an earlier version it won't be there. Otherwise, it's on the bottom right.
Using the main mixer in Reason, the answer is no, unfortunately. You could set up sub mixes using parallel channels and some of the utility mixers to do a work around that is a huge pain and not really worth the effort.
Thank you for the video! Much appreciated. I just got Reason 10, so this certainly helped me out a bit. But how would you route these effects in conjunction with an audio track? In Logic I just create a bus and that's where my effects go. In Reason however, this seems to work entirely different. Could you perhaps point that out to me? It's probably very similar, but I haven't managed to get it right yet. Cheers!
Try doing it a few channels at a time. My guess is that you may have accidentally selected the master channel, which can’t be routed, preventing you from rooting all the others
would i have my drum tracks bus to the fx bus? i noticed when i have it set up the way your showing in the vid i solo out the snare and i cant hear any of my fx the are sent to that track unless i un solo or if i have my tracks bus to the fx bus i have solo the fx bus and the snare to hear the fx if i want to audition the track if that makes sense. thanks
+DJ Noriega you're totally right! You also need to solo either the effect channel or the effect bus. It kind of sucks, but ultimately I think this method is still more powerful.
Hi there .. nice vids very useful... I'm a tribal funky techno producer . I used to do it 10 years ago . Made some tracks but not as good as the material I'm coming up with now as I'm studying dance music and basic music production mixing arranging programming (as I like to make everything from scratch ) and in the future learn in depth mastering.. I fancy a crack at that ... I was wondering if you would be willing to exchange idea's.. more me learning from you lol .. I'm very serious about where I'm going with my life and what I'm going to do music wise
Hey Dan, thanks so much for your kind words - and you're passion for music totally comes through! If you look at my Patreon channel (www.patreon.com/stockmusicmusician), I offer one-on-one coaching, mix critiques, and group lessons there and would love to work with you to help you achieve your music goals!
+macho beats the send knobs and buttons still work! But the return knobs don't. Instead, you use the volume faders to control the return volume. Then buss all the fx together, into a master fx buss to control ultimate level.
Hi, great video thanks. However, when I tried to replicate what you did at around ua-cam.com/video/b7WioPzKFwo/v-deo.html - whereas your Reason session has shown that the Return slots are filled in automatically (in the mixer view) once you have attached the respective mixers to the master section - this isn't happening when I try that? It only does so (auto fills in the return slots) when I attached (in the Rack view) the return cables: but that then just makes the effects act like a normal send/return rather than the system you are achieving whereby one effect goes to another all then going to a single output mixer? Any ideas on why I am not able to replicate what you are doing would be gratefully received! :) Many thanks, Roger
Thank you!!! One other question I have is, is there a way to "solo safe" your Effects Mixer Channels? i.e. to still have them be active (not muted) when you hit solo on another instrument? That would make this method idealll
A few words would suffice!!! 😬 Is this for individual tracks? So I can route each instrument track too? Or for mastering? I'm not a newbie to this but I am far from you in knowledge lol thanks for the videos I am subscribed!
Leroy Jones it's for individual tracks or for busses [for example it could send just the snare to reverb or you could send all the drums]. I do so the master bus through insert effects, though.
+Dev Illion not really. It can actually use less dsp than the traditional way of using send fx in reason, because you don't need to create separate effects for eq and compression!
We've been doing something similar to this in live touring sound and analog studios for years. We basically return all of our global effects, less inserted effects, to open channels, then assign the channel out to either the L/C/R Master Out or to an open subgroup, then to the master out. The technique works well because it gives us much greater control of the signal i.e. Gain, EQ, Compression, etc. than when using the effects return knob. Which is very limited and requires a painful amount of setup in each individual effect processor, which is difficult to change on the fly. It's a good idea to use in Reason for the same reasons we use it and because it does save on CPU usage as opposed to inserting an effect or effects on each channel for more control. Good video.
Thank you.Ive been racking my brain lately to get this right. I can bus the efx bus into a pre stereo bus. I like to do some dynamics control before the stereo bus. Awesome job!
Brilliant, thanks. It took me a while to realise why I was getting a delay on the send effects. It was latency, I changed audio driver and the setup worked perfectly. So if anyone else gets the effects a beat behind, check that.
Fantastic! Also make sure you've click the delay compensation feature on the bottom right.
Hi buddy, I have this problem. Are you able to run though the steps to help me fix it? It would be much appreciated! Thanks!
YOU HAVE NOW MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR ME NEVER TO LEAVE REASON TO GO TO ANY OTHER DAW THANKS SO MUCH BRO BECAUSE I LOVE REASON SO MUCH
+William Harper thanks Will! I'll say that Reason gets pretty frustrating when you've got sessions with a lot of tracks, so I wouldn't get rid of the old daws just yet.
@1:26 you can combine the first effect you create, and chain effects inside the combinator to avoid the connection to the second send effect. If you don't like the combinator, you can always remove it at the end :)
@4:06 If you wanna make the return knob works, you can connect the DIRECT OUT of the individual mixes channel to the Mixer FX Return IN. In alternative you can use the Parallel OUT but you will double the fx signal i think :p
BTW good content :). Good luck with your channel!
The @4:06 comment is brilliant! Thanks so much!!!! Now that you say it, I'm just like - duh!
Glad to help!
Best tip EVER! Saved me so much hassle and headaches! Thank you, Thank you, thank you!!!!
You're welcome!
Great to hear!
That's an interesting title, as there is really no right or wrong way to do it. It's a matter of preference as we've seen in the past comments. This technique reminds me of the old analog days for boards that had limited FX returns. We would just use one of the monitor aux sends to an extra FX box and ran it into an unused channel on the board. That worked great live, because you could easily mute the FX when someone needs to just talk to the crowd. Thanks for the video!
It's definitely the old school way, but I think it's more "right" to do, because I find it easier organizationally, and unlocks additional power (like you can send sends).
This is awesome, thanks so much! I'm playing with it now - subscribed!
Thanks a lot! had to rewatch and pauze the these last three videos a lot to get it all but I finally got a good template going!
Awesome!
exactly what I was looking for 👍
I've been doing this in other DAWs, however, in Reason there is no solo defeat/isolate to keep from muting the EFX when you solo other channels. I've been asking for that option strictly for routing fx to mix(er) channels... since forever.
There isn't, unfortunately. It would be really nice to have, that's for sure.
How do we address the delay caused by this? If you run the reverb 100% dry and trigger a snare hit, you can hear there is a maybe 30 ms differentiation between the snare mix channel and the FX master channel. This delay does not occur when you use the default FX returns on the master rack.
Go to the mixer view and click the "Delay Comp" button in the bottom right.
cool video, but question, you didn't connect the direct outputs of the mix channels into the fx returns. is that not supposed to be connected? or what is difference between connecting or not connecting to fx returns?
Great tips and technique, thanks! It's quite similar to the way Reggae dub effects are used. You can even apply the effect on itself and create feedback
Good point!
Thanks for the tip. I haven't considered this alternate routing before.
+Jamari Mack happy to help! I find it really works well for me!
Great info. Nice video 🤙
Glad it was helpful!
you can also route the mix fx channel (reverb) from drums i.e. to the drumbuss to glue the reverb with the drum elements together with an compressor.
love your stuff man
Thanks!
Awesome advice! Very helpful!
Thanks!
This is a neat idea. Thanks for the explanation.
+JiggyWig happy to help! It really improves my work flow and quality of my mixes!
Awesome idea. Thanks for sharing. You just scored a new subscriber :)
Awesome Jay! Thanks!
Very cool technique! Thanks for sharing!
+God Of Rainbows it's a lot of fun!
First of all: good tutorial, thanks. I followed every step but there is a BIG problem. There is a Delay added that the "delay comp" button can't solve. Is it only me ?
It is 100% accurate for every possible plugin out there. But it should work for hte vast majority. There are sample delay plugins out there you can use to manually set things, but they're a real pain.
I have the same problem with outputting the FX to channels. I get pretty bad delay/latency. Delay comp doesn’t fix it.
Hey, bother. I appreciate you elucidating this alternate & superior approach within Reason. It allows you to get creative, doesn't it? Subscribed :). Also, you've got a great voice for narration, and I liked how you humbly asked for the subscribe. PEACE!
Thanks my man!
The way you do it is the obvious old school way but it has one huge drawback, there is no solo safe in Reasons mixer so if you solo a mix channel that is using a send effect you won't hear it. Of course you can then solo the fx bus but again that adds an extra step.
You're totally right Dennis! Hopefully Reason 10 adds a more feature-rich mute/solo section. During the mixing stage, I really prefer being able to control everything from the mixing board without having to drop back into the rack, which is why I think this send effect technique still has legs!
SUPER useful.. thanks!
Thank you! That was very helpful!
hello Thanks you for your video.
So, if i want more bus effect as PRO TOOLS, LOGIC, CUBASE how i do please?
There’s really not an easy way. You can use parallel busses a bit, but ultimately, Reason only allows 8 send effects, so it’s not truly professional grade
@@StockMusicMusician Thanks you for your answer.indeed, I find it unfortunate that this daw does not give this possibility of having several shipments.
Hi, i have a question. In a blank template where I created 8 mix channels where I would put my effects. Now how can I assign my instruments such as kong or synthesizer to send effect from those mixed channels?
Evan. Thank you so much for your videos. I have returned to this one several times. One thing I haven't been able to do is at 5:14 which is to solo my effects. Whenever I hit solo, reason mutes the source canceling the signal to the effect. If I solo the source also, I hear the source and the effect. Am I doing something wrong? Would like to hear just the effect. I did get to this sweet spot by turning the volume on the source way down, but who wants to touch the faders once you have them set. I also am able to print the effect to an audio channel and then solo, but that is a lot of work and time. Any help is appreciated.
Scott what you describe is one of the shortcomings of the way sends are implemented in reason. I believe if you set the send effect to pre-fader, it still passes through when muted, but honestly, I don't like using pre-fader sends. To make up for this, I tend to boost the volume of my effects channels when I'm trying to dial them in.
Sweet method!! I've been looking for a way to solo FX channels. I know this video is from 5 years ago, so is latency still an issue with this method? I noticed lots of people complaining about that in the comments.
Glad it helped! And great question John - latency is no longer an issue (since Reason 10, I think), if you use the delay compensation button on the bottom right.
This is great!
Happy to help!
Couldn't you just hook up the combinators to the send/return to avoid the auto-route issues you mention in the beginning while still using them as sends on a per-channel basis?
Brilliant, thank you 🙏
Glad it was helpful!
Do you have a vocal template or a tutorial on how to build a send or side chain for Vocals - I would like to see that - I am going to subscribe.
I have some videos in side chaining, but not really focused on vocals. Hopefully can make a video on it in the new year
This is an interesting method, but i have found that its easier to just load one Combinator with FX running directly from the RE to the sends bus and then Use A Parallel channel to add the FX too. The first reason this is good is that your parallel channel will already have EQ, filtering, compression, gating, and routing for your FX. The Second you don't end up changing your source while customizing your FX. This method gives you far more control, while not breaking the way the Reason deals with the FX sends. It also add interesting dynamics to what would be a flat sound.
I definitely see some those advantages. For me a lot also has to do with organization. I use parallel channels for a specific effect (like NY Compression or adding a touch of grit), but for broader filtering I find my method helpful just because I can see things at a glance on my larger projects.
Great tutorial thank you! I have a question, in reason when gain staging should I use the gain knobs or the faders?
Gain knobs! But also be sure to maintain the gain staying between each insert you use
@@StockMusicMusician to be honest I'm not sure how to do that I'm kinda embarrassed to say, I've been teaching myself this whole time so any bit of info helps thanks again man your vids are great and easy to follow :)
How is this different than making a normal reverb send, creating a parallel channel of the sound you want to process, to which you put the send effect and then process it with EQ as an insert on that parallel channel?
Because you can send multiple instruments to this reverb send and process everything the same AFTER the reverb (or before depending on the signal path on the send).
How do you automate individual effects using this method, such as Reverb only on one synth, which is automated in a drop or riser etc?
You still would do individual effects as inserts on their own channels.
Thank you. Really helpful.
This method also works nicely if you are using your sends for headphone mixes. If you have your effects set up this way you just click the send that your separate headphone mix is on for each effect you want to hear in that headphone mix. It is great when you are tracking multiple players who all want there own headphone mix.
Good point!
Thanks for the tip!!! Much appreciated
Is it also possible to use a bus as an fx send in Reason? For parralel compression for example.
yep!
There's a problem here.
If you do this, it will create a slap delay on the mix channel. I tried his and spoke to proellerhead. The plugins latency isn't corrected since it's is detected as unusual routing.
Have you tried adding delay compensation using the button for that in newer versions of Reason?
Is there a way to get more than 8 aux sends?
thank you,Lenny Kravitz
lol
Thanks dude! Where did you get all those extra plugins from? Like the saturation knob and such
The propellerhead shop on their website
Thanks so much homie
You're welcome!
Hey so Jw could you do a video on setting up a screen capture program and how to record the audio from reason. I have an interface and sound flower. And want to use QuickTime, but my issue is that I can only seem to record the audio coming from the built in mic on my Mac
I'm not really familiar with Macs, sorry.
im getting a bit of a delay on the signal when i setup my sends like this. i cant find the delay compensation knob you speak of in one of your comments
I don't think they added delay compensation until Reason 8 or 9 or maybe even 10. If you're using an earlier version it won't be there. Otherwise, it's on the bottom right.
@@StockMusicMusician im on reason 10. is the compensation knob on the mix window, sequencer window or rack?
You can change the name of the combinator to affect the send and return label strips.
Good call!
Fantastic thanks
Most welcome
Hey man! Do you know if its possible to have more than 8 send effects in any way?
Using the main mixer in Reason, the answer is no, unfortunately. You could set up sub mixes using parallel channels and some of the utility mixers to do a work around that is a huge pain and not really worth the effort.
Thank you for the video! Much appreciated. I just got Reason 10, so this certainly helped me out a bit. But how would you route these effects in conjunction with an audio track? In Logic I just create a bus and that's where my effects go. In Reason however, this seems to work entirely different. Could you perhaps point that out to me? It's probably very similar, but I haven't managed to get it right yet. Cheers!
You send the audio track to the effects Sends using the mixer send knobs. Then you can bus all the effects together.
Could you possibly post a stock template for mixing ?
Dauqs Troopers I've got an old one from about six months ago. I'll make a new one once we get our hands on 9.5!
Apologies for asking a year later, but do you happen to have a new one for 10? Genuinely intrigued ! :)
dope tutorial
Happy to help!
what do i do if route to does not show up when i select all channels?
Try doing it a few channels at a time. My guess is that you may have accidentally selected the master channel, which can’t be routed, preventing you from rooting all the others
would i have my drum tracks bus to the fx bus? i noticed when i have it set up the way your showing in the vid i solo out the snare and i cant hear any of my fx the are sent to that track unless i un solo or if i have my tracks bus to the fx bus i have solo the fx bus and the snare to hear the fx if i want to audition the track if that makes sense. thanks
+DJ Noriega you're totally right! You also need to solo either the effect channel or the effect bus. It kind of sucks, but ultimately I think this method is still more powerful.
I tried your method but with Pulverizer and there's lot of phase problem
Did you turn on the "delay compensation" knob in the bottom left? It should cancel that out.
Very cool!!!!
+Nikolai Mishchenko Music it's really powerful once you get comfortable with it
Hi there .. nice vids very useful... I'm a tribal funky techno producer . I used to do it 10 years ago . Made some tracks but not as good as the material I'm coming up with now as I'm studying dance music and basic music production mixing arranging programming (as I like to make everything from scratch ) and in the future learn in depth mastering.. I fancy a crack at that ... I was wondering if you would be willing to exchange idea's.. more me learning from you lol .. I'm very serious about where I'm going with my life and what I'm going to do music wise
Hey Dan, thanks so much for your kind words - and you're passion for music totally comes through! If you look at my Patreon channel (www.patreon.com/stockmusicmusician), I offer one-on-one coaching, mix critiques, and group lessons there and would love to work with you to help you achieve your music goals!
fancy boi
you never did the return cables on the mix channels.
does this still work as send?
Yep, you don't return the cables, because it short circuits the mixer channel. Instead, the mixer channels becomes the returns, essentially.
Thanks!
How to you send it you sad the knobs dont work i like the idea thanks for all of your videos
+macho beats the send knobs and buttons still work! But the return knobs don't. Instead, you use the volume faders to control the return volume. Then buss all the fx together, into a master fx buss to control ultimate level.
Hi, great video thanks. However, when I tried to replicate what you did at around ua-cam.com/video/b7WioPzKFwo/v-deo.html - whereas your Reason session has shown that the Return slots are filled in automatically (in the mixer view) once you have attached the respective mixers to the master section - this isn't happening when I try that? It only does so (auto fills in the return slots) when I attached (in the Rack view) the return cables: but that then just makes the effects act like a normal send/return rather than the system you are achieving whereby one effect goes to another all then going to a single output mixer? Any ideas on why I am not able to replicate what you are doing would be gratefully received! :) Many thanks, Roger
Cool!!!
+Arsen Biser thanks!
How do you save this as a template?
+Greg Mack hey Greg, you can download a template of this I've already made here ua-cam.com/video/0NyN3NGbOTo/v-deo.html
Thank you!!! One other question I have is, is there a way to "solo safe" your Effects Mixer Channels? i.e. to still have them be active (not muted) when you hit solo on another instrument?
That would make this method idealll
I don't understand it..! Would have been great if you had set up a few recorded tracks and had shown how to use your setup...
Thanks Jasper, I'll try to make a demo soon!
A few words would suffice!!! 😬
Is this for individual tracks? So I can route each instrument track too? Or for mastering?
I'm not a newbie to this but I am far from you in knowledge lol thanks for the videos I am subscribed!
Leroy Jones it's for individual tracks or for busses [for example it could send just the snare to reverb or you could send all the drums]. I do so the master bus through insert effects, though.
damn that daw looks complicated cubase make everything so ez
isn´t this a total DSP killer?
+Dev Illion not really. It can actually use less dsp than the traditional way of using send fx in reason, because you don't need to create separate effects for eq and compression!
I´ll have to try this. But i will make a template :D too lazy to do this every time :D
Would be great to have a good brain on my side .. laters bud
weird, won't for me.
Where is it bogging down?
@@StockMusicMusician My guess is Delay ?
wtf
I have trouble mixing in Reason beacuse of RAM issues (i got 16 GB RAM). Is FL Studio, ProTools, or other programs better? i want to use my own VSTs.
16 gigs of ram is plenty. Its probably a cpu bottleneck or lack of sse. Also use wav files when mixing instead of midi instruments
Brilliant! Thank you!
You're welcome!