❎❎ The Muslim is the one from whose tongue and hand the Muslims are safe.(Hadith) A religiously educated person says rasoolullah, in the khutbah of hajjatul wada, taught the Sahabah (including the highest ranking) not to curse or backbite. Auzubillahi After listening to such stupidity,listeners think that the Sahabah were useless people and 13 years of dawah in medinah had no effect on them. This Hadith is not talking about those evil specifically. But warning not to use advanced communication tricks on people and harm them. The Sahabah's Deen,imaan and character was upgraded to understand what these issues were. Cursing and backbiting can't happen from them. "How something is said is More important than what's said". The non Muslims are very in studying this science.
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching. "It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice" The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad. If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"? That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions. Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching. "It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice" The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad. If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"? That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions. Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
The wife of the holy prophet, 'A'isha reported that *Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) never beat anyone with his hand, neither a woman nor a servant,* but only, in the case when he had been fighting in the cause of Allah and he never took revenge for anything unless the things made inviolable by Allah were made violable; he then took revenge for Allah, the Exalted and Glorious.( Sahih Muslim 2328)
They seem to always forget about this hadith Subhanallah. Our prophet (pbuh) was never accused of being an abuser for anyone. He treated his own servants, which most Arab pagan worshippers during that time treated them terribly, like his own brothers. Subhanallah
@@chikienuggies9770 Really? I'm 100% certain you have never read any hadith book in your life. The hadith you are referring to is about friendly push. Read the full hadith is about prophet racing with his wife.
Unapologetic answers are the most confident and straight forward it shows that there is nothing wrong to hide or sugar coat, I wish all other muslim speakers learn.
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching. "It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice" The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad. If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"? That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions. Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
@@Wabbelpaddel 😂😂😂 You chump. You clearly didn’t watch the video and I’m positive that you wouldn’t care to listen to any of what we have to offer so maybe just go back to watching APUS, will ya? APUS who thinks that the sun doesn’t move? Yeah?
@@Wabbelpaddel Something came out of nothing hahaha very funny hahaha yes big bang oo big bang hahaha i am smart hahaha 0 + 0 = 1 hahaha me = scientist hahaha!
Peace Sheragust. I respond as a Christian Teacher. At the (12:00pm) mark within his allleged, "SECULAR ANALOGY" of (SURA 4:34), he uses a very UNBALANCED SECULAR METAPHOR of a (CORPORATION POSITIONAL & WORKPLACE LEADERSHIP) example, to align with what HE is convinced as an EXAMPLE, of what the believed Allah/Al-ilah....is conveying within (SURA 4:34)... Then states.... this...not of the BELIEVED QURAN, OF THE QURANIC BELIEVING WORLD. OR ANY OF THE BELIEVE "HA-DITHS"................."HE THEN SAYS..... 1. FAMILY IS ALSO TO BE LIKE....................THIS. 2. A exampletic comparision of the LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE OF A SECULAR, SECULAR CORPORATION, EXPLAINS (SURA 4:32).. So indirectly to say, Sura 4:34 needs the example measure analogy of a world organization to explain..BEATING ONE'S WIFE... 3. QUESTION, if willing to have the discussion..CAN ARROGANCE BE.............."ALSO"...found in Mankind....ASK ADAM, first created HUMAN & MAN..........WHEN HE PLACED DISOBEDIANCE UPON HIS WIFE EVE..................WHEN THE COMMAND WAS GIVEN................................................TO HIM.... You noticed displacement of the World did NOT HAPPEN UNTIL ADAM ATE OF THE FRIUT..............NOT EVE..AND SHE ATE OF IT .............FIRST... Lets discuss it civilly...NO IDEOLOGIES, OR LOGIC..........JUST QURANIC knowledge, and or Ha-dith..cool!!
I am a Christian and was a huge David Wood and Apostate Prophet fan last few years when i was in high school. Eventually almost all their argumentation made me realize that they dont engage in actual islamic claims but attack a cartoonish version of it. I started realizing all these things you are explaining on your channel on my own by just listening to their objections and ridicule. Christian critics of islam are especially worthy of blame because they accuse our own religion by objecting to islamic standards. Christianity became whitewashed liberal feelings based religion that claims the moral high ground above Moses and the prophets of God. Thank you for promoting old patriarchal non liberal standards.
@Sacred Warrior Nah Im not simping for islam, I find it ridiculous and even worse heretical and damnable. I am a Christian more interested in studying Scripture and ancient cultures far more than any of my peers in the church, so much that they make fun of me because of reading church fathers, Talmud, Greek writers, philosophers and Christian scholars, dead sea scrolls, ugaritic texts, amarna tablets etc. (and no I dont believe anything I read, but I still read them for further insight and understanding of the biblical culture). Am I perfect? Not by far, especially not on my own without God and Christ who can make me perfect. But am I a Christian? Id rather deny any other part of my being than that. But does it make D Wood a good source for islam? No if you dont want to have only baby steps into islam. Thats why for last like 5 years he hasnt produced any video in which he shares a new information on islamic doctrine, he only repeats himself for like 5 years, his content became like 10 times less valuable and insightful. I doubt that he even reads islamic sources all that much nowadays which is sad considering that he does that for a living. Is his work helpful and practical? Yes, and Id venture to say much more than damaging, but still Id prefer a more thought out approach with much more scholarly analysis of the vast collections of islamic sources. But unfortunately we live in a world where short funny content with least possible intellectualism in it is the most popular. If he tomorrow starts anything more than simply bashing Muhammed for the exact same things that he bashed him for like past 5 years (and theres like only 10-20 things that he simply recicles all the time) that would probably hurt his channel unfortunately.
And Im sure that you know that many things that he bashes are also attack on Israelite and Christian faiths. If theres anything intrinsically wrong or ridiculously funny in killing apostates he then bashes our God as well who ordered in his Law that apostates and their lovestock to be burned alive as a whole burnt sacrifice to him. Should Christians do that today? No. But is there any intrinsically sinful in it? No... actually it was sinful for Israelites not to kill those whom God ordered them to kill back then. "Let your eye show no mercy".
And I know that its more popular to bash and ridicule things than to state facts with a serious face. But honesty consistency and our own faith are the price for it.
"We hear and we obey. [We seek] Your forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the [final] destination." Everything Allaah has legislated is Perfect because He, sub'haanahu wa ta'ala, is Perfect. We submit to Him. Indeed, my prayer, my sacrifice, my living, and my dying is for Allaah (alone), the Lord of the worlds.
Authentic Hadith of Prophet Muhammed [peace be upon him] Narrated Mu'awiyah al-Qushayri: I went to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them. (Sunan Abu-Dawood 2144) Grade : Sahih
The beating verse is in such an extreme scenario. Where the wife cheats, you try to stop her with words she persists. You seperate your bed and of she still persists then you hit. And the prophet explained this verse. Where he said you are only allowed to hit with the end of a miswak lightly. Basically a tap. Like u see in western media when the wife cheats he slap her shakes her y did you do this but in islam that's too violent. The prophet never hit any of his wives, but people take this especially islamaphobes and make it seem islam says you can beat ur wife black and blue if u feel like it
Why doesn’t t this man daniel mentione these? Why does he uses the terms „sex-slaves“ an so on? He is bringing so much harm to the ummah. I can’t stand him anymore.
@@ne3583 I agree that he shouldn't use the term sex slaves bc they're not. That word has horrible connotations. Other people have called him out and advised to use appropriate words
8:54 lol how he opens his eyes when brother Daniel says beat the employees.. you can tell he wasn't paying attention to the conversation and suddenly he found golden content that he can use out of context for his brainless followers.
I also understood this simple matter. But this con guy wants content and cherry pick words to show it negatively. That’s why, he isn’t paying that much attention.
We really needed you a long time ago Brother Daniel,this awesome unapologetic content didn't exist back when I debating christians and atheists on comments section
bruh are you ok? you cat even think for yourself , you realize he just said that domestic violence is ok because women who murder people go to prison, huuuh?
Let’s also not forget how messed up a woman must be acting for her to warrant physical discipline from her husband. Harris is talking like “oh you didn’t fold the laundry ok let me leave you bloody and almost dead on the floor” No it’s not like that at all. Daniel maybe you could make a video about what physical discipline is ok (like where the line ends), and maybe also what actions from a woman would warrant physical discipline. These answers would be beneficial for Muslims. Jazakallah for you work !!!!!
The mainstream understanding is that you are allowed to beat with a "siwak" the toothbrush of the arabs ( and more largely the muslim bcz its sunnah). You can't beat on the face neither beat to the point that you are leaving a trail on the woman body. It's just a mark of dicontentement i think. Bcz Allah subhannahu wa tahala ordered us different methods to deal with such a problem, like boycotting her in the bed or bringing the members of the family( this the last way before divorce).
Brother, I think it's best you ask these questions to your local Imam so that you may get the proper fiqh and rulings. Brother Daniel often recommends Muslims to ask our local Islamic scholars on regards to fiqh since his position is a student of knowledge and his speciality is criticising liberalism and modernity.
@@ummerfarooq5383 ??? this verse is in relation to polytheists worshipping false female ‘gods’. What is the relevance of this verse to the initial comment??
The thing is, the only case where you are actually warranted to use physical discipline on your wife is in the case of zina. If you read the context of the Surah in which it talks about zina, you will see that god warrants you only in that case.
Except, there is zero specificity for why a man can beat his wife other than her being simply disobedient. That literally means he can do it for anything he doesn’t like-it’s entirely subjective and unjustified. What messed up woman is going to bulge and fall in love with her hsuand after he beats her up ??the fuck ya can't grasp how violating and infuriating that would feel and think it's some special remedy for a stable marriage
Brother Daniel You Killed it! There were so many things I didnt understand about Sharia and some Islamic rulings due to ignorance, but you managed to explain them to me flawlessly.
@will smith First of all Jackass listen up Quran is the only book, that prevents wife beating by putting 3 conditions before it. What Islam allows isn’t even beating. The biblical and Hinduism concepts of GOD are absolutely disgusting. Watch the video! And some of the shit in there is legit wife beating
@تقي الدين wa Alaykum Assalam akhi actually I'm a night owl, but 4:30 a.m is really late, I can't not to sleep ...I better sleep a little bit earlier and wake up earlier for fajr and debate... I don't know maybe if I were you, I would have drank a lot of coffee and tea to stay awake 😁 it's worth it. however you can watch it later bro...don't take my words seriously
I am a woman. I have no problem with this verse or it's interpretation. Not sure why every person keeps nit picking this command and refuses to understand that the meaning is really not as bad as they're making it out to be. ISLAM DOES NOT CONDONE OR PROMOTE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AT ALL. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS SOMETHING ELSE, THAT SHOULDN'T HAPPEN. THE MAN TAKING CHARGE AND KEEPING DISCIPLINE IS SOMETHING ELSE. RESPECT THE MEN IN YOUR LIVES LADIES AND YOU WILL DO A LOT BETTER.
@@ilyesmilyesm2576 Ofcourse brother . I agree and I am happy with the" whole system "of Islam which has been given to us by Allah S.W.T. Alhamdullilah, and those who know about the filth of western societies ( that how women are treated like an object) will be agreed upon this because this term "wife beating"and " concubines" has been cherry picked by few apostates and misused. And( As a woman) I know that what is the nature of a woman upon which she has been created. we don't want to expose our bodies in front of the whole world, Its not in our nature to leave our houses and go for jobs. if we have a responsible father, brother or a husband who follows Islam. Secondly we only talk about those 50% women who are being abused physically by their husbands what about those 50% of men who are regularly getting emotionally and physically abused by their wives and her parents? Because those cases aren't being reported these so called humanists should raise their voice for those men also. They don't because their ideology is based upon extreme feminism "one sided human rights" men are out of their list as a human even if they are men by themselves😂 if they will speak against women their position would be ruined .it is not obligatory for a women to prepare food for her husband and children yes but they accept this responsibility because Allah has put mercy and love in this relationship what else do we need? And,If we only talk about "nikkah" believe me it is one of the greatest blessing of Allah S.W.T and gift for us. And we love our creator that's why we accept our responsibilities happily . And I have seen people who beat their wives are very far away from the teachings of Islam.Again Because it's a whole system not just one word or verse Jazak Allah.
@@BinteSiddiqui Women are obligated to cook and clean. They are obligated to obey their husband and if husband asks to do those things, it becomes fard.
@@juxtapositionMS Men are also obligated to be leaders. You know what leaders are in Islam? According to Prophet Muhammad SAW, "Leaders are servants". Thus, men are the servants of the family. You attempt to depict as if "obligation" is wrong. Nah, it isn't. It is completely impermissible for a wife to obey her husband "subserviently". If the husband tells his wife to do something crazy, that isn' t permissible. Obedience is just another means to keep the wife and husband equal, and at the same time, maximize the strength of the family. You take principles from Islam, twist it, make it your premise, then conclude such a twisted perception. Although I am in that assumption that you are another Islamaphobe. But, if your intention is pure, then this comment should mean nothing to you :D Allah knows best!
1.If authority is delegated to the members of family / within kinship rather than state how do we safeguard against a misuse of this authority? All men are not saints and some men will use this authority to mistreat women. What is done to prevent it? 2. To understand fiqh it takes years and years of study. Even there is differences of opinions among the ulamas regarding the rulings on certain issues. How can we expect every single man (many of them have no knowledge of fiqh or no religious training) to implement the rulings correctly? This leads me to believe that, in an islamic state, ultimately the jurists /fuqahah will give out rulings. The state will enforce those laws. But then how is this different from the law enforcement in a secular state?
A major problem with compering husband beating his wife with the state punishing criminals is Neutrality. In the first case the husband is the disputed with and the judge at the same time. If this happened in the tribunal it will be immediately called unjust
@@17x-d5k no not domestic abuse in the manner you are imagining and for minor reasons I don't think that is allowed in Islam. For example even with children if you physically discipline you cannot leave a mark.
The thing with this is that the vid perfectly breaks it down. I was pleasantly surprised as I learnt something new and was sincere. But watching that debate alone it did make you look bad. The issue here is if at first you just made it clear you wouldn’t have to make further vids. But now you have people who just watched the debate and perceive you as bad. And that’s basically your fault in a way. Next time just explain it like this. I get maybe time didn’t permit but do better. Overall, good vid!
Actually in Arabic the word (ضرب) can have multiple meanings it can mean (go far away), as mentioned by sheik Omar abdulkafi. Arabic is a very deep language and one word can sometimes have 4 or more meanings. Plus the prophet peace be upon him has never hit any woman in his life.
There’s no qualifying particle or parable in this verse for “strike,” so it can only mean “strike.” The word is وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ not واضربوا عنهن & hence this verse cannot be translated “Leave them alone/Go away from them.” All major authentic Tafaseer therefore translate وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ as strike, hit, scourge etc.
It doesnt say "Beat them" nor "Beat them Lightly". The word used on the verse "Adrobohona" is a very loaded word with different semantics and dependent on context. its meaning has changed as time passed & gained a new one that is more popular. Unfortunately the popular one which is the "modern one" & its literal straight forward meaning is "beat them", Its used in English that way or even among some uneducated muslims because People whom translated or Interpreted it wrongly are projecting their personal beliefs, ill hearted will or the new meaning the word has gained compared to its previous usage in the prophet's [pbuh] time. if you take the whole Quran contextually, the same word or similar was used MULTIPLE times and it NEVER meant "Strike it/them" or "Beat it/them", it had different meanings such as "to leave'em" and "to separate/split or isolate" or "to travel" and finally "to set forth or to bestow".. . And naturally the wording on that instance would mean anything else other then "strike or beat em". Because the Quran is an absolute unit and connected, Its also important to take into account that both the Quran and reliable hadiths recommend men to be righteous and respectful to their women, And it if that Word in that Verse meant to "beat'em", then it would be the ONLY instance where a verse breaks and contradicts the whole Quran and its contextual usage of the words & over all cohesion, before and after the verse was written regarding the Quran as a whole. God said in his verses that he will see to his verses and ambiguous ones, are to be interpreted in the right good way and those who do are truly blessed by knowledge. It does happen in my country where you have the husband sleeping on the couch (admonish the bed), next stage of 'conflict' would be one of them leaving and staying at their parents until they sort their problems out. Authentic Hadith of Prophet Muhammed [pbuh] Narrated Mu'awiyah al-Qushayri: I went to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them. (Sunan Abu-Dawood 2144) Grade : Sahih
@Ceiling Fan Whenever someone tries to explain things in a contextualized way you get reactions by hardline literalist who accuse other muslims of being modernized as if their is only one interpretation.
There’s no qualifying particle or parable in this verse for “strike,” so it can only mean “strike.” The word is وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ not واضربوا عنهن & hence this verse cannot be translated “Leave them alone/Go away from them.” All major authentic Tafaseer therefore translate وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ as strike, hit, scourge etc.
@@nailanoorein2086 hala sister ♥️ am not ok with someone beating women as a general rule of course our religion is all about respect and caretaking of women. The beating is for certain kinds of women and under strict rules and after lots of phases. Its important to research this my sister to get the full picture. My father may Allah have mercy on him once was having dinner with us and one of mysisters was talking about one of her friends who her husband was beating her against the teachings of religion, My father stopped eating and said: a man beatibg a woman? And he stood up very surprised and kinda of angry and he told us without finishing his meal that this guy is not a real man. What I want to tell u here that its not something that Islam promotes, we need to understand that its a solution for very particular case and in a very strict way some scholars say it cant be more than a hit with miswak which is a pencil or so, its not at all like they have u understand at all. I hope your heart is filled with happiness research the teaching Naila dont judge Islam from the wrong actions from few people. May Allah protect you and daughters and all of ur family
I love the points against liberalism. A lot of the times Muslims are defending Islam and are forgetting the failures of liberal systems. I like how Daniel brings all these points and puts them under the defensive.
I think an important point Daniel makes is respect for the patriarch. If he didn’t uphold the order and boundaries, subconsciously the wife will loose respect for him. If you got away with breaking the rules at work, you would slowly start testing the limits on how much you can get away with. You need the authority to implement the rules or else there will be chaos and the organisation with fail.
Hindus loves to point at Islam and pretend as if their religion liberates woman and is modern, check this out Women shouldn't be given freedom according to Hinduism : Srila Prabhupada Issckon founder He is just quoting Hindu scriptures : Rama said in valmiki ramayana 2.24.20 "As long as a woman is alive, her husband is her god and master to her" . Ram in Ramcharitamanas जिमि सुतंत्र भएँ बिगरहिं नारी Means "Independence ruins women" . . Gautama dharamsutra (18.1).-'A woman is not independent with respect to the sacred Law' . Baudhāyana dharamsutra (2.3.44). Women do not possess independence . Vashistha smriti (5.1).-'A woman is not independent; the males are her masters. . Vishnu smriti (25.12).- A woman shouldn't act by herself in any matter.' . Yājñavalkya smriti (1.85). There is no independence for woman at any time.' . Brihaspati smriti (24.2).-'A woman must be restrained from even slight transgressions by her relations, by night and by day she must be watched by her mother-in-law and other ladies of the family. . Shukraniti (4.4.11, 23).-'Women have no separate right to the employment of the means of realising the ree ends of spiritual merit, wealth and pleasures and my favourite shiva purana 2.3.54 - 19- " a chaste lady should never take her husband' s name, if husband scolds or rebukes her she should not abuse in return. EVEN IF BEATEN BY him she shall remain glad and say" i may even be killed my lord, be kind to me "..!!! 😂
@@craigthebrute2848 shivapuran - kotirudra samhita, chapter 12 its mentioned that shiva harassed wives of sages and sages cursed shiva by saying The rsis said "Since you are following the evil path contrary to vedic practices, therefore let your linga(cock) fall on earth.." (SP-KS-chapter 12) and in later verses it fell.. and that's What is worshipped now
You can't beat women in Islam. But you can rebuke a disobedient wife by lightly hitting her leg with a toothbrush. The hit should not bruise, break or leave marks. Lightly is the keyword. It's more of an emotional rebuke than physical at all.
@@juxtapositionMS Nope the Hadith clearly says strike them without pain anything else? I enjoin you to treat women well, for they are like captives to you. Verily, you have no right treat them otherwise, unless they commit flagrant immorality. If they do so, then you may separate from their beds and strike them without causing pain, but if they obey you then you may do nothing against them. Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1163, Grade: Sahih
@@juxtapositionMS Aisha reported: مَا ضَرَبَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ شَيْئًا قَطُّ بِيَدِهِ وَلَا امْرَأَةً وَلَا خَادِمًا إِلَّا أَنْ يُجَاهِدَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, never struck anything with his hand, neither a servant nor a woman, unless he was fighting in the path of Allah. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2328, Grade: Sahih
A very compelling argument but it would help to explain what “beating” actually means in this context. If I was a non Muslim listening to this I would assume this means you can afflict on your wife devastating blows, like giving her a black eye or something.
you see he is doing the same thing he does to arabic words, mistranslating/misusing and conflating words with different meanings together to make one word take on the same meaning as another, example to 'beat' and to 'punish' is the same to him, but to punish can mean to punish by fines of money and to beat, is to physically assault no other way around it. He is clever he knows what he is doing, but he is totally WRONG in his explanation, but most of his fans are young and/or speak English as a second language so they won't catch this stuff. This is an abomination to Islam and will only harden the non muslims hearts to islam and will drive unsuspecting muslims away, he just needs to stop.
@@bradchilders5546 well I don’t think he is doing that on purpose, I just think he needs to explain more and realize that most of the audience don’t understand what the “beating” entails. And I wouldn’t cal it an “abomination” either sheesh. 😂
@@IbrahimIsmail4889 I've been following him for years, I follow his telegram and have watched ALL his videos and I see this tactic used often. He has read books on debate, or at least studied it, and knows how to present a narrative and drive it home, and he chooses to do it in a dishonest way. He did his undergrad at Harvard, so im not willing to give him the excuse of ignorance, sorry im just not. Not everybody that claims to 'defend Islam' is doing the right thing. There are right and wrong ways to achieve things and I think what he does is dangerous.
@@bradchilders5546 it's literally in Quran , everyone interested in Islam will read it that's why it needs to be addressed stop running away from anti Islamic propaganda against Islam .
It is fine for a Nashez woman to ASSAULTED by police force but not to be beaten lightly by her husband! Her husband can report her & let her taste the beatings of Justice instead if he wanted to cause her harm without repercussions LOL BTW the way of administering beating was also mentioned in the Qur'an if you wonder where did the Miswak or green stick or the like came from Surah Saad 44 (and We said to him): “Take in your hand a bundle of rushes and strike with it, and do not break your oath.” Oh my how brutal !!!!
@@SamZizla Re-read my comment Did I mention the quran say beat "lightly" You make accusations out of the bat! please point it out in quotation marks! or did I say the What the scholars based Miswak, green stick & the like? Why are you like this?
@@SamZizla I don't care for what you think... I only approve of God ordains! if the NASHEZ recalcitrant wife (not any wife mind you) transgressed there are procedures to be followed. They are CLEAR instructions since it is mentioned in Sunah !!! for example: Narrated Hakim bin Mu'awiyah on the authority of his father (RA): I asked, "O Messenger of Allah, what are the rights of a wife of one of us on her husband?" He replied, "You should give her food when you eat, clothe her when you clothe yourself, not strike her on the face, and do not revile her or desert her except within the house." Again in a long Hadith ....Show fear towards God regarding women, for you have got them under God’s security, and have the right to intercourse with them by God's word. They must not bring into your houses anyone whom you dislike, but if they do that beat them, though not severely (lightly). You are responsible for providing them with their food and clothing in a fitting manner. In general striking is discouraged as a choice except for utmost urgency How? If you took your time to read the verse itself you will notice the ordering! The permissibility of punishing the wife by admonishing and advising her, deserting her in bed, and beating her without inflicting harm. If the wife ceases to be recalcitrant, all the consequences are waived ! if he transgressed he will have to answer to the Judge! Is it clear now?
@@SamZizla The Hadith in question proves your claims WRONG it wasn't about siding with anyone. At that time the prophet used to divorce wife beaters. Basically This woman came running to him to exploit this! I'll break it down from the Arabic narration in easier simpler terms... 1_The prophet inquired the situation without preference unlike Lady Aisha which rushed to conclusion due to being emotional 2_The accusation was her husband being sexually frustrated & impotent which drove him to transgress upon her in severe beating! 3_The husband accused her back of lying saying he is a stud. 4_The prophet inquired if her intention was to make a play of Tahleel marriage !!!! (Haram is Islam) 5_ The children from another wife of his are his spitting image! thus proving he is capable of intercourse & not impotent 6_ The resulted ruling is not known beyond these points! whether in favor or against! Narrated `Ikrima: Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came, `Aisha said, "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!" When `AbdurRahman heard that his wife had gone to the Prophet, he came with his two sons from another wife. She said, "By Allah! I have done no wrong to him but he is impotent and is as useless to me as this," holding and showing the fringe of her garment, `Abdur-Rahman said, "By Allah, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! She has told a lie! I am very strong and can satisfy her but she is disobedient and wants to go back to Rifa`a." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, to her, "If that is your intention, then know that it is unlawful for you to remarry Rifa`a unless `Abdur-Rahman has had sexual intercourse with you." Then the Prophet (ﷺ) saw two boys with `Abdur- Rahman and asked (him), "Are these your sons?" On that `AbdurRahman said, "Yes." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "You claim what you claim (i.e.. that he is impotent)? But by Allah, these boys resemble him as a crow resembles a crow," Sahih al-Bukhari 5825 Chapter 23: Green clothes, Book 77: Dress
@@SamZizla It wasn't addressed further in the Hadith !! do you want me to make a conclusion instead? it won't change the fact The conclusion with the ruling is simply not there !!!! Regarding The harm in question there are two possibilities: "It might be" the husband doing or might be self inflicted... if it was the first maybe retaliation "Qisas" is in order on the husband ~ (for the wife to to inflict the same degree of harm unto him or ask for damages compensation) if it was the later (self inflicted) & the wive does not want to continue then maybe divorce.. but with forbidding her from returning to the previous divorced husband! sadly we got nothing further to the hadith... nor is there a continuation of what became of them later on! if & maybe is all you gonna get in this comment (based on todays Fiqh)
In the West, wife beating is super violent. Often, they hit the face and leave bruises etc... That's why it's so disgusting for people here. They don't know how violence should be used within a family. It's important to maintain authority in a family and if necessary, violence can be useful/necessary. As long as it's fair and reasonable, it can be logical to use violence against rebellious members if the family unit is in danger. But in practice, it's nearly never necessary I think and there are better ways to react than that. God knows best of course.
Even the beating fo islam isn’t justified in the case of her not wanting to bathe the kids and prepare them for school, the beating is when a wife commits a فاحشه مبينه liks cheating
@@nailanoorein2086 the punishment for cheating in Qur'an is lashes. Not Rajam. That's a Jewish thing that crept into our hadith. Anyway, this verse 4:34 has long been misinterpreted and abuse by the likes of Haqiqatjou, and there is no debating them
You completely messed this one up brother I'm sorry. Islam doesn't sanction "wife beating" without following the process. First admonish, then separate beds for 60 days,....then and only then can the husband hit his wife lightly if he thinks it would bring her to her senses. And this is only the case of rebelliousness as defined by Islam...not cultural norms. A woman is a full human being with intellectual capacity and accountability, not a child that has to be beaten to keep order. Islam has rules and a process to follow. You totally missed the mark on this one. Wife beating in terms of domestic violence (which is what happens in vast majority of wife beating in the modern era) is forbidden. Beating in the manner you describe is about subjugation and enforcement of authority, not harmony. (34). Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).
And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Fear Allaah with regard to women, for you have taken them as a trust from Allaah and intimacy with them has become permissible to you by the words of Allaah. Your right over them is that they should not allow anyone to sit on your furniture whom you dislike; if they do that then hit them but not in a harsh manner. And their right over you is that you should provide for them and clothe them on a reasonable basis.” Narrated by Muslim, 1218.
@@thuba7572 A qualified Muslim scholar would need to explain this. As the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa salaam wasn't know to hit his wives. Another translation says " chastise" not beat. To a violent man, that means beating a woman who is created weaker than you. I havea serious problem with that notion.
@@nasarma MEN have the right to physically discipline their wives. Of course, I don't support bashing of Women and beating her till she bleeds. Islam is clear on this issue. The beating should be such that it leaves no mark or bruises. Umar ra and Aboobackar ra physically beat their daughters Ayisha ra and Hafsa ra when there was the issue with the Prophet. Yes, the Prophet did not do it, but it doesent take away from the fact that Allah gave Men that authority. Maybe Ur confusion arises because u may think that Men and Women are equal partners in marriage, in Islam they are NOT. If u have a serious problem with this, u have problem with Allah's ruling.
@@thuba7572 I find your assessment problematic. Someone really needs to define "beating". Hitting someone without leaving a mark will still hurt and it doesn't lead to harmony in a marriage...period. in cases I've seen its lead to oppression and subjugation. Men of modern age DO NOT understand or know how to implement physical discipline of their wives. There is a process which I outlined in the first comment. 1. Admonish...2.separate beds for 60 days and then and only then 3. he can hit but it should be lightly where it doesn't cause pain. The VAST MAJORITY of men hitting their wives now is DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. if she talks back,if she doesn't cook dinner on time, if she says or does something he doesn't like...the list goes on...then she gets a slap. THIS IS NOT PERMISSIBLE. A woman is not a slave that should be subjugated irregardless of a husband's right over her. And unfortunately men of this day and age don't know how to properly lead their families. Brute force against your wife is OPPRESSION!
Under Islam, wives are also given the right to beat their husbands if they don't uphold their obligations to their wives and families, although much more indirectly through the courts. I mean after all, if you have someone else do it on your behalf, you are just as responsible for the assault as if you did it yourself.
@@nailanoorein2086 yes If you are dumb and stupid, than that’s what you do sister. Some women on the other hand are brave and confidente and get out of an abusive marriage..
@@samuelrigaud6595 The beating is not a hard beating with a belt it’s a slap with the palm not on the face on the body…. It’s not meant to cause severe pain or damage if it does then the wife can divorce the husband
@@samuelrigaud6595 If the wife commits so non noble actions and the husband has already been warning her and she continues then he may proceed to resort to hiring her cus he is the top of the family and he most protect the family and he is the one with authority over his wife and kids and he has authority over the wife just like Mother has authority over kids….
Men are in charge of women by [right of] what allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, allah is ever exalted and grand.
Wth Daníel it doesn’t say beat to submission it says strike the word in Arabic doesn’t mean beat your woman at all I saw somewhere that is not allowed to beat your wife in Islam
@Allapjalla well sister if you are from the west,just be grateful for what you have,if you were born a muslim girl in a muslim famiky then you would never have converted to islam
A really beautiful explanation... you succeded to make the listener reach a conclusion that in some contexts "beating wife" would be a necessity for marriage to continue. While other weak Sheikhs do their best to reach the conclusion of "the beating is not that hard, people :')"
@@Earthling108 ?! Regardless of the way you rephrased my words... Did you even watch the video? It's like you go to baseball match, buy a ticket, have a seat among Yankees fans, and ask one of them: "wHaT teAm aRe yOu cHEeRiNg fOr?!"
👏🏻 your answer so strong and clear this is the amazing about it I wasn’t expecting that you really answered in very simple why for a question many they consider it as something needs to much power to understand it
For the summary: make sure you don't wound em physically nor even mentally. even anomaly and papanomaly likes to beat each other out of their childish behavior.
That was a really good response and obviously snailtan with his small brain could not answer it. However, it would have been great if you had just added the context of this verse. I mean these conmen makes it look like that wife beating is the 1st option when it isn't. There are precedents to this & it's the last resort. Also the extent of beating is also very clearly explained in hadith. If it is coupled with this argument then it would make much greater sense.
Yup this debate is now being used by Atheists, they quote that this is how horrible Islam actually is and being given all sorts of flavours. I have encountered several on UA-cam quoting this debate
Ultimate authority is given to the state to ensure there is justice, that is why the judicial system is called the justice system, but the laws are made by the people via officials they elect
Nobody is saying is wrong to use force on women to enforce the law. The problem is the law itself. You shouldn’t have the right to assault anybody except for the case of self defense of life or property. If you spouse is acting an a way that you disapprove of but she’s not killing or destroying property then divorce her. But beating her will not solve anything and would probably just create distrust and enmity in the marriage.
@Ceiling Fan Daniel doesn’t seem to know anything about family in the first place. He acts like power to the husband is the most important thing. Acting like that destroys family’s, doesn’t fix them. I know this from personal experience. Also domestic violence destroys family. It negatively impacts the children and the wife.
@@DominoRenzo lmao actually it's vice versa, the husband as the main leader and sustainer of the family is very effective and look at Islamic families we increasing in numbers and our fertility rates are high sky unlike secular communities who constantly need immigration XD
@@DominoRenzo and no , beating a rebellious screaming degrading wife after all the peaceful solutions has certain conditions " you don't need cops aka stranger men to physically force her into staying calm " Doesn't leave a mark " so can't be server like a freaking fight " , not on the face , doesn't lead to harm Wife in Islam is taken care of financially and she doesn't need to participate in anything financially and she has the freedom to ask for divorce if she doesn't want to obey certain norms within the family and want to become atheist for example XD
Husband and wife at home , questions: Who is the Judge? Who interprets the law? Who inflicts the penalty? Is there a case when the wife can beat the husband?
@@albgs2963yes you can, and he can get a criminal record and he can lose his job. There is a whole establishment that can hold an officer accountable. If a husband beats his wife that is not there
Yah Harris also doesn't understand the difference between formal oppression and informal oppression Formal patriarchy and informal patriarchy, Formal rape and informal rape Formal crime and informal crime 🤣🤣 Listen the argument carefully or take someone help who has that capacity
@@ahnafrashik Rape is a crime. It's government that handles be it male or female perpetuator. Husband does not need to resort to beating in domestic misunderstanding. Daniel is mistaking formal relationship like employment and legal case for informal relationship like marriage. Governments don't beat wives. Governments punish offenders of the law according to how jurisdiction appropriate justice. Daniel is so desperate to have said that it's government that does wife beating on behalf of husband in liberal society. Nobody is government's wife. All are citizens with duties and rights.
i think ull should listen to simon sinek.. he explains relationships much better. women may love the macho man or a wife beater lol but are they happy?? nah they regret it. sure they like a man who is a leader and takes charge but a true leader is a person that listens and reasons with the people of the family or co-operation, not beat them up or fire them for not meeting some imaginary targets. men and women shld not strive to aim for authority.. aim for fucking respect and earn it. not through force but my the way u carry urselves. seriously listen to simon sinek. there is more compassion and reason in his talk.
@@mysteriousportal7077 simple. People like you call everyone idiot and worship one person like they are God. Even though i completely disagree with Daniel at least I refer to him by his name n not call him an idiot. Second... People like you are completely null of any sense n agree to anything that fits your narrative. Third Simon sinek is just overall better.. lol bet that hurts you
So where is the Islamic passage that states a woman should beat her husband when he is disobedient and immoral? 😂 I can't believe you drew a parallel between Islam permitting a husband to physically punish his wife to a cop arresting a criminal in the act. Wow. Violating the law is a lot harder to do than violating Islamic values as a woman. If your wife does not wear her Hijab correctly one day, you are within your right to beat her. If she disobeys her husbands command, travels anywhere alone, or even LOOKS at another man let alone touches them, It is then permissible to beat them. This happens everyday is Islamic households and Islamic countries. You talk about comparing apples and oranges, but I just watched you do exactly that again, and again, and again. If you love Islam and Islamic countries so much, then why do you not move to an Islamic country? Why stay here in the Christian country of America where we believe in freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and preventing things such as spousal abuse and wife beating?
My God another woman that has a hard time understanding. He cannot beat his wife for her not wearing hijab for one day. If you listened you would have heard that he must advice her first then if she persist then do not share a bed with her. I didn’t read anything you said past that because you absolutely had no understanding of this video & the ln proceeded to talk about something you don’t have a clue on smh.
@@HAQQ1st actually he can beat his wife for anything of he personally deems it as disobedient and so he is even more justified to do so if she is doing haram
@@taimurahmad your answer is husband can beat their wives because they have the right to authority. Women are not children, and beating children is also abuse. What exactly is the husband in charge of? Not getting his whims satisfied? Explain what he’s in charge of that justifies subjecting his wife, an adult, to physical violence. Would men accept being controlled and beaten by their wives, like they were by their parents when they were kids and feel respected?
Rebellion. IF your wife attacks you and attempts to kill you for no reason, then you can defend yourself. If your wife cheats, then you can use beating as THE LAST RESORT. Speak to her first, if it doesn't work, don't sleep with her, if it doesn't work, then you have the right to beat your wife, because it will establish equality in the family, and prevent your wife from falling astray. But if your wife forgot something so simple, it's love and mercy that should prevail. It makes no sense to admonish your wife or even beat your wife for such a simple mistake.
@@galagainstterror There is a comprehensive ruling for that in the Islamic Law. I have no knowledge of it as of the moment. You can research it up but don't expect to get the full details because topics like these aren't mostly accesible online. We have books for them that aren't popular in Google nor the West. But, if you ask enough people and research enough, you'll get the answer
لقد كنت رائعا جدا في الدفاع عن المسلمون وليس الاسلام , لان الاسلام يحفظه الله تعالى . استمر بقوة وبشراسة , فلا تراجع ولا استسلام . تعجبني دائما فيديوهاتك , ولكن لي راجاء عندك ان يكون هناك نرجمة للغة العربية , اعرف انك نعرف عربي وانا عربي واعرف الانجابزبة , لذا فاستطيع ان اشاهد فيديوهاتك فهي قيمة لذا الترجمة ضرورية جدا , وخصوصا هذه الايام , فالحرب على المسلمين هي خرب معرفة فقط , وليس عقول فالعقل بيد الله تعالى ولا يستطيع احد ان يتلاعب به او يعيره . والسلام عليكم
respond as a Christian Teacher. At the (12:00pm) mark within his allleged, "SECULAR ANALOGY" of (SURA 4:34), he uses a very UNBALANCED SECULAR METAPHOR of a (CORPORATION POSITIONAL & WORKPLACE LEADERSHIP) example, to align with what HE is convinced as an EXAMPLE, of what the believed Allah/Al-ilah....is conveying within (SURA 4:34)... Then states.... this...not of the BELIEVED QURAN, OF THE QURANIC BELIEVING WORLD. OR ANY OF THE BELIEVE "HA-DITHS"................."HE THEN SAYS..... 1. FAMILY IS ALSO TO BE LIKE....................THIS. 2. A exampletic comparision of the LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE OF A SECULAR, SECULAR CORPORATION, EXPLAINS (SURA 4:32).. So indirectly to say, Sura 4:34 needs the example measure analogy of a world organization to explain..BEATING ONE'S WIFE... 3. QUESTION, if willing to have the discussion..CAN ARROGANCE BE.............."ALSO"...found in Mankind....ASK ADAM, first created HUMAN & MAN..........WHEN HE PLACED DISOBEDIANCE UPON HIS WIFE EVE..................WHEN THE COMMAND WAS GIVEN................................................TO HIM.... You noticed displacement of the World did NOT HAPPEN UNTIL ADAM ATE OF THE FRIUT..............NOT EVE..AND SHE ATE OF IT .............FIRST... Lets discuss it civilly...NO IDEOLOGIES, OR LOGIC..........JUST QURANIC knowledge, and or Ha-dith..cool!!
@@timcreekmur2770 it is very difficult to answer u fully here. But (1) Adam & eve never ever eat (in the QURAN), they TASTE a fruit, & tasting is never as eating as u know, (2) Yes , there is beating in the QURAN, BUT u have to take it withing the context of QURANIC raising of children, NOT as NONISLAAMIC raising. Otherwise no one will have EDRAAK of this. NOW, to have EDRAAK of this, u have to have it from TADABBOR of the QURAN & SONNAH DIRECTLY from them & NOT from any HUMAN BEING. WHY??? because COMPREHENSION of any one DEPENDS on his\her knowledge, & this is HOW ALLAAAH (SWT) CREATE the human ie, FITRAH. THANX
@@nafsology3681. Peace. I appreciate your response. Let's go over your burden of Historical Authenticated, carbon-dated, and you will need. With the Word of God/ Bible, existing before the believed Quranic Text, you must NOW, present historical evidence that the book of GENESIS, say that Adam and his wife Eve, ate of the fruit, for it WENT INTO THEIR MOUTH, also. present evidence that the FIRST BOOK OF THE "TORAH/TARAT", is not the presently existing biblical Torah, before we move on, therefore establishing WHERE the believed Quran's evidence of refuting the Biblical book of Genesis' wording.. No logic, or simply..BECAUSE THE QURAN SAID IT. for that presents a "PLAGERIZED" Quran?
I have a question :when can a man beat his wife Alsl most importantly.if he beat hos wife where she did nothing wrong,what are the repercussions for that Also,say a muslim woman is going through violent domestic abuse,what can she do to leave as she cant leave her house without her husbands permisssion ?
The threat of violence through a security/police officer is present IF the employee (female) does not comply (obey the rules) with leaving the premise. And the threat of violence can range from forcibly being picked-up and thrown out all the way to being killed. Whereas the muslim husband's threat of violence is relatively extremely constrained (such as can't hit the face, not leave a mark/injury etc.)
@@essakhan1575 Utter nonsense... There is no comparison. Police has to greatly restrain itself. I am 50. I never had anyone around me who received any kind of violence from police. Also you can not normalize police beating and killing which most of the time regarded as use of disproportionate force. In contrast, domestic abuse is a social disease which is extremely wide-spread. It starts with wife beating and ends in murder. Any discourse that condones and justifies domestic abuse is dangerous. If I were a Muslim women to marry, I would put a phrase in the marriage contract that the marriage will be annulled if he ever hits me. I am an able individual. I am my own person. I am not anybody's property. I make my own decisions. If a husband does like them, he can divorce me but I ill never allow anybody hitting me.
@Ceiling Fan There is no comparison between a police and a husband. Police is under state control and 100% accountable for its actions. Police can be inspected and scrutinized if they do anything wrong. Police can be dismisses if they are mistaken.
@Ceiling Fan Police is under systematic investigation. Not all women have means to file a complaint about their husbands. Women will be greatly disadvantaged. There is no comparison between a public officer and a domestic situation behind the doors.
I think we all know that we could and have the right to beat our wife's but who have done it? I am 20 years married and it never came to my mind to beat my wife. Of course there are always exceptions but it is not common.
Masculinity is haram in the post-modern world. Edit: This literally haram, but made haram (impermissible) by post-modernity. Post-modernity reverses haram and halal.
That is literally the most obvious argument yet the "humanists" don't seem to understand it ,and keep asking the exact same dumb question Well done Haqiqatjou 👌
Yep this is the modern westernized woman, childless, husband less, but of course highly sexualized, arrogant, suffering from psychotic depression...and on...
I grew up im the middle east and there are many depressed women over here,walked upon,trampled upon,but they dont get mental help of any kind sadly. I know as there are women in my family with nobway out who lived life like this,where they are not a human being as a woman,as awell person of their own,they have only been objects used and discarded
But why do such women concern you They do not harm you There are many men lkke that too,depressed arrigant psychotic and they too die alone You focus on bettering yourself thsoe women are not hurting you in anyway.they do not concern you
(as a last resort as stated in Quran) Beating should be done, only be as light as it doesn't leave a mark(according to hadith) but what's the source of as same as miswak?
@@aswitnessedbythelenses963 *‘Ata’ said: I said to Ibn ‘Abbaas, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, Hitting with a siwaak and the like. [A siwaak is a small stick or twig used for cleaning the teeth - Translator] *
Beating is Haram ???? Really Only for men or women also? What kind of joke is that? If you wife cheats you nd attacks you , still You cant do anything because its haram. Thats idiocy on your part
@@wannabesage5870 bro if she cheat she will get lashed by the law why even bother doing anything to her tell the authority because she could call for domestic abuse just take a shot and give that to the judge
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching. "It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice" The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad. If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"? That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions. Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
you keep talking about the rules that women shouldn’t break in order to not be physically hurt, what are these rules? Also isn’t there a hadith about the prophet not hurting a single fly
@Ceiling Fan why not just divorce her and move on and get a new wife and beating in islam is like beating with miswaak not like mehdi tidjani and others that Daniel supported and how can u imagine a healthy relationship when u always want to beat or emotionally abuse your wife if she raised her voice for example like she's not human being and she's your dog ?!! And isn't it not fair that allah created women weaker than men but also give the men the right to beat them and he gave the men much stronger physique and men using that to abuse women ?!! And plus men are allowed to have up to four wives so why not just leave her ?!! And u also get 72 virgins in heaven like u guys have so much power in islam and u still want to abuse women
@Ceiling Fan u keep saying man's rights like for ex if she denied him intercorse cause she's tired after a long day of home work or cause she's not in the mood , how is that going to damage the marriage if he just waited till the next day lol why not be patient and put excuse for your wife , you're exaggerating , it doesn't have to be always rough , and why you don't want me to bring mehdi tidjani here lol if Daniel himself talked to him that's a sign of support to an abusive husband and father and kept insulting single mothers and divorced ones , even non Muslims called him out while a lot of Muslim men including Daniel and the 3 Muslims and others took him as a role model , he's the last one that Muslim men should be taking advise from lol what a shame , and when u say she raised her voice on him it's not like he's gonna be quite or sumn so why go physical to " disciplining " her and at the same time u agree that islam did not permit beating towards women , are u contradicting urself ??? And why not divorce and move on?? And when i mentioned that domestic violence in marriage can will never lead to a healthy marriage what does that have to do with u saying that it's hard to find partner ? It's about who will accept to live under abuse not about searching for a wife and paying the mahr !! and how does that can damage him psychologically when he can divorce her men are more capable of having another wife easily and moving on , and if you're struggling in finding one even then when u find her ubbetter be thankful not to abuse her and make think she came as to be ordered only and " disciplined " and to to be look down as inferior creature
Follow on Telegram: t.me/haqiqatjou Support our work: muslimskeptic.com/contribute/
Great response brother.
جزاك الله خيرا
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 thank you
❎❎
The Muslim is the one from whose tongue and hand the Muslims are safe.(Hadith)
A religiously educated person says rasoolullah, in the khutbah of hajjatul wada, taught the Sahabah (including the highest ranking) not to curse or backbite. Auzubillahi
After listening to such stupidity,listeners think that the Sahabah were useless people and 13 years of dawah in medinah had no effect on them.
This Hadith is not talking about those evil specifically. But warning not to use advanced communication tricks on people and harm them.
The Sahabah's Deen,imaan and character was upgraded to understand what these issues were.
Cursing and backbiting can't happen from them.
"How something is said is
More important than what's said". The non Muslims are very in studying this science.
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching.
"It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice"
The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad.
If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"?
That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions.
Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
you're an idiot! you're not allowed to beat women in Australia! But police can use force if someone resists arrest or to defend themselfs.
I love how this man is unapologetic about his Deen and don't sugarcoat stuff, jazakallah khira for these videos akhi
We need him in the uk. Too many coward apologists preaching here.
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching.
"It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice"
The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad.
If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"?
That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions.
Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
Refreshing
The wife of the holy prophet, 'A'isha reported that *Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) never beat anyone with his hand, neither a woman nor a servant,* but only, in the case when he had been fighting in the cause of Allah and he never took revenge for anything unless the things made inviolable by Allah were made violable; he then took revenge for Allah, the Exalted and Glorious.( Sahih Muslim 2328)
Subhan Allah. Best of creation Muhammed S.A.W.W.
Free Palestine that statement is as much about character and conduct of our mothers Khadijah, Aisha and the rest (ra) as that of our Prophet ()
They seem to always forget about this hadith Subhanallah. Our prophet (pbuh) was never accused of being an abuser for anyone. He treated his own servants, which most Arab pagan worshippers during that time treated them terribly, like his own brothers. Subhanallah
lol he himself your prophet Muhammad hit Aisha and she even said it caused her pain
@@chikienuggies9770 Really? I'm 100% certain you have never read any hadith book in your life. The hadith you are referring to is about friendly push. Read the full hadith is about prophet racing with his wife.
Unapologetic answers are the most confident and straight forward it shows that there is nothing wrong to hide or sugar coat, I wish all other muslim speakers learn.
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching.
"It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice"
The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad.
If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"?
That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions.
Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
Unapologetic answers are confident because behind them lies unshakable faith.
@@Wabbelpaddel 😂😂😂 You chump. You clearly didn’t watch the video and I’m positive that you wouldn’t care to listen to any of what we have to offer so maybe just go back to watching APUS, will ya? APUS who thinks that the sun doesn’t move? Yeah?
@@Wabbelpaddel Something came out of nothing hahaha very funny hahaha yes big bang oo big bang hahaha i am smart hahaha 0 + 0 = 1 hahaha me = scientist hahaha!
Peace Sheragust. I respond as a Christian Teacher. At the (12:00pm) mark within his allleged, "SECULAR ANALOGY" of (SURA 4:34), he uses a very UNBALANCED SECULAR METAPHOR of a (CORPORATION POSITIONAL & WORKPLACE LEADERSHIP) example, to align with what HE is convinced as an EXAMPLE, of what the believed Allah/Al-ilah....is conveying within (SURA 4:34)... Then states.... this...not of the BELIEVED QURAN, OF THE QURANIC BELIEVING WORLD. OR ANY OF THE BELIEVE "HA-DITHS"................."HE THEN SAYS.....
1. FAMILY IS ALSO TO BE LIKE....................THIS.
2. A exampletic comparision of the LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE OF A SECULAR, SECULAR CORPORATION, EXPLAINS (SURA 4:32).. So indirectly to say, Sura 4:34 needs the example measure analogy of a world organization to explain..BEATING ONE'S WIFE...
3. QUESTION, if willing to have the discussion..CAN ARROGANCE BE.............."ALSO"...found in Mankind....ASK ADAM, first created HUMAN & MAN..........WHEN HE PLACED DISOBEDIANCE UPON HIS WIFE EVE..................WHEN THE COMMAND WAS GIVEN................................................TO HIM.... You noticed displacement of the World did NOT HAPPEN UNTIL ADAM ATE OF THE FRIUT..............NOT EVE..AND SHE ATE OF IT .............FIRST... Lets discuss it civilly...NO IDEOLOGIES, OR LOGIC..........JUST QURANIC knowledge, and or Ha-dith..cool!!
I am a Christian and was a huge David Wood and Apostate Prophet fan last few years when i was in high school. Eventually almost all their argumentation made me realize that they dont engage in actual islamic claims but attack a cartoonish version of it. I started realizing all these things you are explaining on your channel on my own by just listening to their objections and ridicule. Christian critics of islam are especially worthy of blame because they accuse our own religion by objecting to islamic standards. Christianity became whitewashed liberal feelings based religion that claims the moral high ground above Moses and the prophets of God. Thank you for promoting old patriarchal non liberal standards.
@Sacred Warrior i probably know those things better than you, cause I read those collections of hadiths while you only listened to D Wood
@@magnificentuniverse3085 beautiful response brother, beautifully said! GOD BLESS!
@Sacred Warrior Nah Im not simping for islam, I find it ridiculous and even worse heretical and damnable. I am a Christian more interested in studying Scripture and ancient cultures far more than any of my peers in the church, so much that they make fun of me because of reading church fathers, Talmud, Greek writers, philosophers and Christian scholars, dead sea scrolls, ugaritic texts, amarna tablets etc. (and no I dont believe anything I read, but I still read them for further insight and understanding of the biblical culture). Am I perfect? Not by far, especially not on my own without God and Christ who can make me perfect. But am I a Christian? Id rather deny any other part of my being than that. But does it make D Wood a good source for islam? No if you dont want to have only baby steps into islam. Thats why for last like 5 years he hasnt produced any video in which he shares a new information on islamic doctrine, he only repeats himself for like 5 years, his content became like 10 times less valuable and insightful. I doubt that he even reads islamic sources all that much nowadays which is sad considering that he does that for a living. Is his work helpful and practical? Yes, and Id venture to say much more than damaging, but still Id prefer a more thought out approach with much more scholarly analysis of the vast collections of islamic sources. But unfortunately we live in a world where short funny content with least possible intellectualism in it is the most popular. If he tomorrow starts anything more than simply bashing Muhammed for the exact same things that he bashed him for like past 5 years (and theres like only 10-20 things that he simply recicles all the time) that would probably hurt his channel unfortunately.
And Im sure that you know that many things that he bashes are also attack on Israelite and Christian faiths. If theres anything intrinsically wrong or ridiculously funny in killing apostates he then bashes our God as well who ordered in his Law that apostates and their lovestock to be burned alive as a whole burnt sacrifice to him. Should Christians do that today? No. But is there any intrinsically sinful in it? No... actually it was sinful for Israelites not to kill those whom God ordered them to kill back then. "Let your eye show no mercy".
And I know that its more popular to bash and ridicule things than to state facts with a serious face. But honesty consistency and our own faith are the price for it.
"We hear and we obey. [We seek] Your forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the [final] destination."
Everything Allaah has legislated is Perfect because He, sub'haanahu wa ta'ala, is Perfect. We submit to Him.
Indeed, my prayer, my sacrifice, my living, and my dying is for Allaah (alone), the Lord of the worlds.
May Allah reward you immensely.
I am in tears
Everyone, be sure to tune into the debate tomorrow with Hammer Time.
I am so ready for it😤
Can’t wait
With who? Daniel? Where?
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 9:00pm EST
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 np :)
Authentic Hadith of Prophet Muhammed [peace be upon him]
Narrated Mu'awiyah al-Qushayri:
I went to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.
(Sunan Abu-Dawood 2144) Grade : Sahih
thank you for sharing this
The beating verse is in such an extreme scenario. Where the wife cheats, you try to stop her with words she persists. You seperate your bed and of she still persists then you hit. And the prophet explained this verse. Where he said you are only allowed to hit with the end of a miswak lightly. Basically a tap. Like u see in western media when the wife cheats he slap her shakes her y did you do this but in islam that's too violent.
The prophet never hit any of his wives, but people take this especially islamaphobes and make it seem islam says you can beat ur wife black and blue if u feel like it
Why doesn’t t this man daniel mentione these? Why does he uses the terms „sex-slaves“ an so on? He is bringing so much harm to the ummah. I can’t stand him anymore.
@@ne3583 I agree that he shouldn't use the term sex slaves bc they're not. That word has horrible connotations. Other people have called him out and advised to use appropriate words
@@HassanAli-rb5hq not even the quran used these kind of words… sone one has to stop him. I can’t stand him anymore
8:54 lol how he opens his eyes when brother Daniel says beat the employees.. you can tell he wasn't paying attention to the conversation and suddenly he found golden content that he can use out of context for his brainless followers.
He is idiot and arrogant as well.
He only listens to himself speaking!
I also understood this simple matter. But this con guy wants content and cherry pick words to show it negatively. That’s why, he isn’t paying that much attention.
The fact ya thing those things are remotely analogous shows how out of touch you people are.
We really needed you a long time ago Brother Daniel,this awesome unapologetic content didn't exist back when I debating christians and atheists on comments section
Facts, that’s how all these clowns got famous. Because no one used to respond to them back then
Bang on
Daniel broke this down so beautifuly.
only a fool wont agree with his explanation and analogies
I disagree. I dont even think 'smart' atheists would understand this. They can't even understand the concept of a creator
bruh are you ok? you cat even think for yourself , you realize he just said that domestic violence is ok because women who murder people go to prison, huuuh?
@@chikienuggies9770 That is not what he said...
@@chrodegang8406 oh really what did he say?summarize it
@@chikienuggies9770 Sure. He said any law imply the use of force.
Let’s also not forget how messed up a woman must be acting for her to warrant physical discipline from her husband.
Harris is talking like “oh you didn’t fold the laundry ok let me leave you bloody and almost dead on the floor”
No it’s not like that at all.
Daniel maybe you could make a video about what physical discipline is ok (like where the line ends), and maybe also what actions from a woman would warrant physical discipline. These answers would be beneficial for Muslims. Jazakallah for you work !!!!!
The mainstream understanding is that you are allowed to beat with a "siwak" the toothbrush of the arabs ( and more largely the muslim bcz its sunnah). You can't beat on the face neither beat to the point that you are leaving a trail on the woman body. It's just a mark of dicontentement i think. Bcz Allah subhannahu wa tahala ordered us different methods to deal with such a problem, like boycotting her in the bed or bringing the members of the family( this the last way before divorce).
Brother, I think it's best you ask these questions to your local Imam so that you may get the proper fiqh and rulings. Brother Daniel often recommends Muslims to ask our local Islamic scholars on regards to fiqh since his position is a student of knowledge and his speciality is criticising liberalism and modernity.
@@ummerfarooq5383 ??? this verse is in relation to polytheists worshipping false female ‘gods’. What is the relevance of this verse to the initial comment??
The thing is, the only case where you are actually warranted to use physical discipline on your wife is in the case of zina. If you read the context of the Surah in which it talks about zina, you will see that god warrants you only in that case.
Except, there is zero specificity for why a man can beat his wife other than her being simply disobedient. That literally means he can do it for anything he doesn’t like-it’s entirely subjective and unjustified.
What messed up woman is going to bulge and fall in love with her hsuand after he beats her up ??the fuck ya can't grasp how violating and infuriating that would feel and think it's some special remedy for a stable marriage
Just when you thought Snailtan was done being roasted. The French will take him either way lol
The French ?
@@Kebbab.213 they eat snails
@@mindlessprocrastination6630 oh alright. I'm French by the way lol
@@mindlessprocrastination6630 Moroccans too.
@@juxtapositionMS they brought it through colonialism
Finally a true unapologetic answer that I will always preach and shout out brother Daniel.May Allah bless you
Finally? Seems the ummah is not that proud to be Muslim
@@samuelrigaud6595 only western muslim have this kind of problem not in the case of gulf countries Muslim they are very practicing
@@motivees3934 western muslims or not they are part of the ummah
@@samuelrigaud6595 every muslim is part of the ummah
is just that every muslim struggle the fitna in different way. may Allah make it easy for us
Truth will never be silenced!
Brother Daniel You Killed it! There were so many things I didnt understand about Sharia and some Islamic rulings due to ignorance, but you managed to explain them to me flawlessly.
@will smith First of all Jackass listen up Quran is the only book, that prevents wife beating by putting 3 conditions before it. What Islam allows isn’t even beating. The biblical and Hinduism concepts of GOD are absolutely disgusting. Watch the video! And some of the shit in there is legit wife beating
Daniel Akhi May Allah protect you, the debate will start at 4:30 a.m here in Iran!😪 hope that I can wake up inshaAllah.😃
Fajr is around 5:30 a.m.
@تقي الدين wa Alaykum Assalam akhi
actually I'm a night owl, but 4:30 a.m is really late, I can't not to sleep ...I better sleep a little bit earlier and wake up earlier for fajr and debate...
I don't know maybe if I were you, I would have drank a lot of coffee and tea to stay awake 😁 it's worth it. however you can watch it later bro...don't take my words seriously
I am a woman. I have no problem with this verse or it's interpretation. Not sure why every person keeps nit picking this command and refuses to understand that the meaning is really not as bad as they're making it out to be. ISLAM DOES NOT CONDONE OR PROMOTE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AT ALL. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS SOMETHING ELSE, THAT SHOULDN'T HAPPEN. THE MAN TAKING CHARGE AND KEEPING DISCIPLINE IS SOMETHING ELSE. RESPECT THE MEN IN YOUR LIVES LADIES AND YOU WILL DO A LOT BETTER.
okay you are actually making sense without trying to avoid the real translation. thank you, sir
3:20 petition for Daniel to tell us what putting trans inmates in women prison leads to.
Women safety 😂😂😂
😂😂😂
@Muslim
Women asked for this...let em enjoy
Great Answer Masha Allah 👍
Happy to see sisters agreeing,
الحمد لله
@@ilyesmilyesm2576 Ofcourse brother . I agree and I am happy with the" whole system "of Islam which has been given to us by Allah S.W.T. Alhamdullilah, and those who know about the filth of western societies ( that how women are treated like an object) will be agreed upon this because this term "wife beating"and " concubines" has been cherry picked by few apostates and misused. And( As a woman) I know that what is the nature of a woman upon which she has been created. we don't want to expose our bodies in front of the whole world, Its not in our nature to leave our houses and go for jobs. if we have a responsible father, brother or a husband who follows Islam. Secondly we only talk about those 50% women who are being abused physically by their husbands what about those 50% of men who are regularly getting emotionally and physically abused by their wives and her parents? Because those cases aren't being reported these so called humanists should raise their voice for those men also. They don't because their ideology is based upon extreme feminism "one sided human rights" men are out of their list as a human even if they are men by themselves😂 if they will speak against women their position would be ruined .it is not obligatory for a women to prepare food for her husband and children yes but they accept this responsibility because Allah has put mercy and love in this relationship what else do we need? And,If we only talk about "nikkah" believe me it is one of the greatest blessing of Allah S.W.T and gift for us. And we love our creator that's why we accept our responsibilities happily . And I have seen people who beat their wives are very far away from the teachings of Islam.Again Because it's a whole system not just one word or verse Jazak Allah.
@@BinteSiddiqui Women are obligated to cook and clean. They are obligated to obey their husband and if husband asks to do those things, it becomes fard.
@@juxtapositionMS
Men are also obligated to be leaders. You know what leaders are in Islam? According to Prophet Muhammad SAW, "Leaders are servants". Thus, men are the servants of the family. You attempt to depict as if "obligation" is wrong. Nah, it isn't. It is completely impermissible for a wife to obey her husband "subserviently". If the husband tells his wife to do something crazy, that isn' t permissible. Obedience is just another means to keep the wife and husband equal, and at the same time, maximize the strength of the family.
You take principles from Islam, twist it, make it your premise, then conclude such a twisted perception.
Although I am in that assumption that you are another Islamaphobe. But, if your intention is pure, then this comment should mean nothing to you :D
Allah knows best!
@@juxtapositionMS sexism spotted
1.If authority is delegated to the members of family / within kinship rather than state how do we safeguard against a misuse of this authority? All men are not saints and some men will use this authority to mistreat women. What is done to prevent it?
2. To understand fiqh it takes years and years of study. Even there is differences of opinions among the ulamas regarding the rulings on certain issues. How can we expect every single man (many of them have no knowledge of fiqh or no religious training) to implement the rulings correctly?
This leads me to believe that, in an islamic state, ultimately the jurists /fuqahah will give out rulings. The state will enforce those laws. But then how is this different from the law enforcement in a secular state?
A major problem with compering husband beating his wife with the state punishing criminals is Neutrality.
In the first case the husband is the disputed with and the judge at the same time.
If this happened in the tribunal it will be immediately called unjust
This is the best explanation I've heard.
Are you a male or female?
I will be glad hearing a sister agreeing.
@@hamzaajakkaf7523 female and revert, alhamdulilah
@@hanaat4386 masha'allah
@@hanaat4386
So you agree with wife beating physical domestic abuse seriously?
@@17x-d5k no not domestic abuse in the manner you are imagining and for minor reasons I don't think that is allowed in Islam. For example even with children if you physically discipline you cannot leave a mark.
short answer: yes. Long answer: Yes
Man I love the muslim sceptic, he's so clear and straight forward!
lol you love the fact he justifies abusive relationships
Pagan idolaters will chase you..
Pagan idolaters hate the truth.
Pagan idolaters have mental disorder like the antichrist polpot of Tarsus.
@@ALC6501 bruh
@@chikienuggies9770Facts don’t care about feelings
The thing with this is that the vid perfectly breaks it down. I was pleasantly surprised as I learnt something new and was sincere. But watching that debate alone it did make you look bad. The issue here is if at first you just made it clear you wouldn’t have to make further vids. But now you have people who just watched the debate and perceive you as bad. And that’s basically your fault in a way. Next time just explain it like this. I get maybe time didn’t permit but do better. Overall, good vid!
Actually in Arabic the word (ضرب) can have multiple meanings it can mean (go far away), as mentioned by sheik Omar abdulkafi. Arabic is a very deep language and one word can sometimes have 4 or more meanings. Plus the prophet peace be upon him has never hit any woman in his life.
There’s no qualifying particle or parable in this verse for “strike,” so it can only mean “strike.” The word is وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ not واضربوا عنهن & hence this verse cannot be translated “Leave them alone/Go away from them.” All major authentic Tafaseer therefore translate وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ as strike, hit, scourge etc.
It doesnt say "Beat them" nor "Beat them Lightly". The word used on the verse "Adrobohona" is a very loaded word with different semantics and dependent on context. its meaning has changed as time passed & gained a new one that is more popular.
Unfortunately the popular one which is the "modern one" & its literal straight forward meaning is "beat them", Its used in English that way or even among some uneducated muslims because People whom translated or Interpreted it wrongly are projecting their personal beliefs, ill hearted will or the new meaning the word has gained compared to its previous usage in the prophet's [pbuh] time. if you take the whole Quran contextually, the same word or similar was used MULTIPLE times and it NEVER meant "Strike it/them" or "Beat it/them", it had different meanings such as "to leave'em" and "to separate/split or isolate" or "to travel" and finally "to set forth or to bestow".. . And naturally the wording on that instance would mean anything else other then "strike or beat em". Because the Quran is an absolute unit and connected, Its also important to take into account that both the Quran and reliable hadiths recommend men to be righteous and respectful to their women, And it if that Word in that Verse meant to "beat'em", then it would be the ONLY instance where a verse breaks and contradicts the whole Quran and its contextual usage of the words & over all cohesion, before and after the verse was written regarding the Quran as a whole. God said in his verses that he will see to his verses and ambiguous ones, are to be interpreted in the right good way and those who do are truly blessed by knowledge.
It does happen in my country where you have the husband sleeping on the couch (admonish the bed), next stage of 'conflict' would be one of them leaving and staying at their parents until they sort their problems out.
Authentic Hadith of Prophet Muhammed [pbuh]
Narrated Mu'awiyah al-Qushayri:
I went to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.
(Sunan Abu-Dawood 2144) Grade : Sahih
Apologetics.
Thank You for showing the dangers of literalism.
@Ceiling Fan Whenever someone tries to explain things in a contextualized way you get reactions by hardline literalist who accuse other muslims of being modernized as if their is only one interpretation.
agreed.
There’s no qualifying particle or parable in this verse for “strike,” so it can only mean “strike.” The word is وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ not واضربوا عنهن & hence this verse cannot be translated “Leave them alone/Go away from them.” All major authentic Tafaseer therefore translate وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ as strike, hit, scourge etc.
Salaam brother Daniel. Great video. It would be great if you could reference some studies you mention in your videos. Jzk khairaan
Am a woman, Alhamdulilah on the grace and bless of Islam
Are you okay with a man beating you or your daughter
Sister I dont understand this,I cannot accpet this
I feel that my religion degrades me
@@nailanoorein2086 hala sister ♥️ am not ok with someone beating women as a general rule of course our religion is all about respect and caretaking of women. The beating is for certain kinds of women and under strict rules and after lots of phases. Its important to research this my sister to get the full picture.
My father may Allah have mercy on him once was having dinner with us and one of mysisters was talking about one of her friends who her husband was beating her against the teachings of religion, My father stopped eating and said: a man beatibg a woman? And he stood up very surprised and kinda of angry and he told us without finishing his meal that this guy is not a real man. What I want to tell u here that its not something that Islam promotes, we need to understand that its a solution for very particular case and in a very strict way some scholars say it cant be more than a hit with miswak which is a pencil or so, its not at all like they have u understand at all.
I hope your heart is filled with happiness research the teaching Naila dont judge Islam from the wrong actions from few people. May Allah protect you and daughters and all of ur family
@@nailanoorein2086If my daughter is ill behaving, abusing and very rude to his husband then I have no problem with his husband disciplining her
Thank you so much daniel. Im your fan frm pkistan. Love you bro
Jazak Allah
The manager have the right to beat you?? And compare the situation with beating ur wife???
I love the points against liberalism. A lot of the times Muslims are defending Islam and are forgetting the failures of liberal systems. I like how Daniel brings all these points and puts them under the defensive.
I think an important point Daniel makes is respect for the patriarch. If he didn’t uphold the order and boundaries, subconsciously the wife will loose respect for him. If you got away with breaking the rules at work, you would slowly start testing the limits on how much you can get away with. You need the authority to implement the rules or else there will be chaos and the organisation with fail.
Never thought of it like this. Brilliant point brother.
Do you know that Shahih International was written by a revert muslim sister? Maa shaa Allaah, Allaahumma baarik laha.
Thank you very much. It was a well done, beautifully put, informative, and much needed video.
جزاكم الله خير الجزاء في الدنيا و الاخرة
Hindus loves to point at Islam and pretend as if their religion liberates woman and is modern, check this out
Women shouldn't be given freedom according to Hinduism : Srila Prabhupada Issckon founder
He is just quoting Hindu scriptures :
Rama said in valmiki ramayana 2.24.20 "As long as a woman is alive, her husband is her god and master to her"
.
Ram in Ramcharitamanas जिमि सुतंत्र भएँ बिगरहिं नारी
Means "Independence ruins women"
.
.
Gautama dharamsutra (18.1).-'A woman is not independent with respect to the sacred Law'
.
Baudhāyana dharamsutra (2.3.44).
Women do not possess independence
.
Vashistha smriti (5.1).-'A woman is not independent; the males are her masters.
.
Vishnu smriti (25.12).- A woman shouldn't act by herself in any matter.'
.
Yājñavalkya smriti (1.85). There is no independence for woman at any time.'
.
Brihaspati smriti (24.2).-'A woman must be restrained from even slight transgressions by her relations, by night and by day she must be watched by her mother-in-law and other ladies of the family.
.
Shukraniti (4.4.11, 23).-'Women have no separate right to the employment of the means of realising the ree ends of spiritual merit, wealth and pleasures
and my favourite
shiva purana 2.3.54 - 19- " a chaste lady should never take her husband' s name, if husband scolds or rebukes her she should not abuse in return. EVEN IF BEATEN BY him she shall remain glad and say" i may even be killed my lord, be kind to me "..!!! 😂
Yeah?
Shivalingham
this is just 5 percent, i can post 100s of such verses
@@craigthebrute2848 shivapuran - kotirudra samhita, chapter 12
its mentioned that shiva harassed wives of sages and sages cursed shiva by saying
The rsis said "Since you are following the evil path contrary to vedic practices, therefore let your linga(cock) fall on earth.." (SP-KS-chapter 12)
and in later verses it fell.. and that's What is worshipped now
@@orca-io
Chad islam: 1
Shivalingham: 0
I loved the ugly manager bit
It was hilarious 😂
well said. Islam is honest. And ISLAM is the only way to live life peacefully.
Wallahi I love how br Daniel turned this around. JazakumAllah Khair.
The last thing we need to be doing is sugar coating things because the feminists will eat that too and the obesity epidemic doesn't need help.
You can't beat women in Islam. But you can rebuke a disobedient wife by lightly hitting her leg with a toothbrush. The hit should not bruise, break or leave marks. Lightly is the keyword. It's more of an emotional rebuke than physical at all.
Apologetic simp mindset.
@@juxtapositionMS
Nope the Hadith clearly says strike them without pain anything else?
I enjoin you to treat women well, for they are like captives to you. Verily, you have no right treat them otherwise, unless they commit flagrant immorality. If they do so, then you may separate from their beds and strike them without causing pain, but if they obey you then you may do nothing against them.
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1163, Grade: Sahih
@@juxtapositionMS
Aisha reported:
مَا ضَرَبَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ شَيْئًا قَطُّ بِيَدِهِ وَلَا امْرَأَةً وَلَا خَادِمًا إِلَّا أَنْ يُجَاهِدَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ
The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, never struck anything with his hand, neither a servant nor a woman, unless he was fighting in the path of Allah.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2328, Grade: Sahih
@@juxtapositionMS abusive man detected, bro he is literally right
exactly, its not called being apologetic dont be mad because islam is just that humane and merciful lol..
A very compelling argument but it would help to explain what “beating” actually means in this context.
If I was a non Muslim listening to this I would assume this means you can afflict on your wife devastating blows, like giving her a black eye or something.
you see he is doing the same thing he does to arabic words, mistranslating/misusing and conflating words with different meanings together to make one word take on the same meaning as another, example to 'beat' and to 'punish' is the same to him, but to punish can mean to punish by fines of money and to beat, is to physically assault no other way around it. He is clever he knows what he is doing, but he is totally WRONG in his explanation, but most of his fans are young and/or speak English as a second language so they won't catch this stuff. This is an abomination to Islam and will only harden the non muslims hearts to islam and will drive unsuspecting muslims away, he just needs to stop.
@@bradchilders5546 well I don’t think he is doing that on purpose, I just think he needs to explain more and realize that most of the audience don’t understand what the “beating” entails.
And I wouldn’t cal it an “abomination” either sheesh. 😂
@@IbrahimIsmail4889 I've been following him for years, I follow his telegram and have watched ALL his videos and I see this tactic used often. He has read books on debate, or at least studied it, and knows how to present a narrative and drive it home, and he chooses to do it in a dishonest way. He did his undergrad at Harvard, so im not willing to give him the excuse of ignorance, sorry im just not. Not everybody that claims to 'defend Islam' is doing the right thing. There are right and wrong ways to achieve things and I think what he does is dangerous.
@@bradchilders5546 he say "quote on quote" before saying it. So, it should not taken literally that beating means "beating".
@@bradchilders5546 it's literally in Quran , everyone interested in Islam will read it that's why it needs to be addressed stop running away from anti Islamic propaganda against Islam .
SUBHANALLAH ❤️🤍❤️
Beautifully Articulated
May Allah SWT bless you and accept your efforts.
جزاك الله خيراً
It is fine for a Nashez woman to ASSAULTED by police force but not to be beaten lightly by her husband!
Her husband can report her & let her taste the beatings of Justice instead if he wanted to cause her harm without repercussions LOL
BTW the way of administering beating was also mentioned in the Qur'an if you wonder where did the Miswak or green stick or the like came from
Surah Saad 44
(and We said to him): “Take in your hand a bundle of rushes and strike with it, and do not break your oath.”
Oh my how brutal !!!!
Where does the quran say beat "lightly"?
@@SamZizla Re-read my comment
Did I mention the quran say beat "lightly"
You make accusations out of the bat!
please point it out in quotation marks!
or did I say the What the scholars based Miswak, green stick & the like?
Why are you like this?
@@SamZizla I don't care for what you think... I only approve of God ordains!
if the NASHEZ recalcitrant wife (not any wife mind you) transgressed there are procedures to be followed.
They are CLEAR instructions since it is mentioned in Sunah !!!
for example:
Narrated Hakim bin Mu'awiyah on the authority of his father (RA): I asked, "O Messenger of Allah, what are the rights of a wife of one of us on her husband?" He replied, "You should give her food when you eat, clothe her when you clothe yourself, not strike her on the face, and do not revile her or desert her except within the house."
Again in a long Hadith
....Show fear towards God regarding women, for you have got them under God’s security, and have the right to intercourse with them by God's word. They must not bring into your houses anyone whom you dislike, but if they do that beat them, though not severely (lightly). You are responsible for providing them with their food and clothing in a fitting manner.
In general striking is discouraged as a choice except for utmost urgency
How?
If you took your time to read the verse itself you will notice the ordering!
The permissibility of punishing the wife by admonishing and advising her, deserting her in bed, and beating her without inflicting harm.
If the wife ceases to be recalcitrant, all the consequences are waived !
if he transgressed he will have to answer to the Judge!
Is it clear now?
@@SamZizla
The Hadith in question proves your claims WRONG
it wasn't about siding with anyone.
At that time the prophet used to divorce wife beaters.
Basically This woman came running to him to exploit this!
I'll break it down from the Arabic narration in easier simpler terms...
1_The prophet inquired the situation without preference unlike Lady Aisha which rushed to conclusion due to being emotional
2_The accusation was her husband being sexually frustrated & impotent which drove him to transgress upon her in severe beating!
3_The husband accused her back of lying saying he is a stud.
4_The prophet inquired if her intention was to make a play of Tahleel marriage !!!!
(Haram is Islam)
5_ The children from another wife of his are his spitting image! thus proving he is capable of intercourse & not impotent
6_ The resulted ruling is not known beyond these points! whether in favor or against!
Narrated `Ikrima: Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came, `Aisha said, "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!" When `AbdurRahman heard that his wife had gone to the Prophet, he came with his two sons from another wife. She said, "By Allah! I have done no wrong to him but he is impotent and is as useless to me as this," holding and showing the fringe of her garment, `Abdur-Rahman said, "By Allah, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! She has told a lie! I am very strong and can satisfy her but she is disobedient and wants to go back to Rifa`a." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, to her, "If that is your intention, then know that it is unlawful for you to remarry Rifa`a unless `Abdur-Rahman has had sexual intercourse with you." Then the Prophet (ﷺ) saw two boys with `Abdur- Rahman and asked (him), "Are these your sons?" On that `AbdurRahman said, "Yes." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "You claim what you claim (i.e.. that he is impotent)? But by Allah, these boys resemble him as a crow resembles a crow,"
Sahih al-Bukhari 5825
Chapter 23: Green clothes, Book 77: Dress
@@SamZizla It wasn't addressed further in the Hadith !! do you want me to make a conclusion instead?
it won't change the fact
The conclusion with the ruling is simply not there !!!!
Regarding The harm in question there are two possibilities:
"It might be" the husband doing or might be self inflicted...
if it was the first
maybe retaliation "Qisas" is in order on the husband ~
(for the wife to to inflict the same degree of harm unto him or ask for damages compensation)
if it was the later (self inflicted) & the wive does not want to continue then maybe divorce.. but with forbidding her from returning to the previous divorced husband!
sadly we got nothing further to the hadith... nor is there a continuation of what became of them later on!
if & maybe is all you gonna get in this comment (based on todays Fiqh)
You explained so well Masha’allah and you are absolutely Right they are losers 100% losers .
jazakallahu khairan
In the West, wife beating is super violent. Often, they hit the face and leave bruises etc... That's why it's so disgusting for people here. They don't know how violence should be used within a family. It's important to maintain authority in a family and if necessary, violence can be useful/necessary. As long as it's fair and reasonable, it can be logical to use violence against rebellious members if the family unit is in danger. But in practice, it's nearly never necessary I think and there are better ways to react than that. God knows best of course.
I grew up in the middle east and wife beating iver her is quite violent too
It is not considered wrong tk beat your wife
Even the beating fo islam isn’t justified in the case of her not wanting to bathe the kids and prepare them for school, the beating is when a wife commits a فاحشه مبينه liks cheating
Wait,isnt the punishment for cheating stoning to death?
@@nailanoorein2086 yes 🗿
@@nailanoorein2086 the punishment for cheating in Qur'an is lashes. Not Rajam. That's a Jewish thing that crept into our hadith. Anyway, this verse 4:34 has long been misinterpreted and abuse by the likes of Haqiqatjou, and there is no debating them
it is rajam. You have apostated if you believe otherwise. that verse was in the quran@@billybro1403
You completely messed this one up brother I'm sorry. Islam doesn't sanction "wife beating" without following the process. First admonish, then separate beds for 60 days,....then and only then can the husband hit his wife lightly if he thinks it would bring her to her senses. And this is only the case of rebelliousness as defined by Islam...not cultural norms. A woman is a full human being with intellectual capacity and accountability, not a child that has to be beaten to keep order. Islam has rules and a process to follow. You totally missed the mark on this one. Wife beating in terms of domestic violence (which is what happens in vast majority of wife beating in the modern era) is forbidden. Beating in the manner you describe is about subjugation and enforcement of authority, not harmony.
(34). Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).
I agree with Naeema
And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Fear Allaah with regard to women, for you have taken them as a trust from Allaah and intimacy with them has become permissible to you by the words of Allaah. Your right over them is that they should not allow anyone to sit on your furniture whom you dislike; if they do that then hit them but not in a harsh manner. And their right over you is that you should provide for them and clothe them on a reasonable basis.” Narrated by Muslim, 1218.
@@thuba7572 A qualified Muslim scholar would need to explain this. As the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa salaam wasn't know to hit his wives. Another translation says " chastise" not beat. To a violent man, that means beating a woman who is created weaker than you. I havea serious problem with that notion.
@@nasarma MEN have the right to physically discipline their wives. Of course, I don't support bashing of Women and beating her till she bleeds. Islam is clear on this issue. The beating should be such that it leaves no mark or bruises. Umar ra and Aboobackar ra physically beat their daughters Ayisha ra and Hafsa ra when there was the issue with the Prophet. Yes, the Prophet did not do it, but it doesent take away from the fact that Allah gave Men that authority. Maybe Ur confusion arises because u may think that Men and Women are equal partners in marriage, in Islam they are NOT. If u have a serious problem with this, u have problem with Allah's ruling.
@@thuba7572 I find your assessment problematic. Someone really needs to define "beating". Hitting someone without leaving a mark will still hurt and it doesn't lead to harmony in a marriage...period. in cases I've seen its lead to oppression and subjugation. Men of modern age DO NOT understand or know how to implement physical discipline of their wives. There is a process which I outlined in the first comment. 1. Admonish...2.separate beds for 60 days and then and only then 3. he can hit but it should be lightly where it doesn't cause pain. The VAST MAJORITY of men hitting their wives now is DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. if she talks back,if she doesn't cook dinner on time, if she says or does something he doesn't like...the list goes on...then she gets a slap. THIS IS NOT PERMISSIBLE. A woman is not a slave that should be subjugated irregardless of a husband's right over her. And unfortunately men of this day and age don't know how to properly lead their families. Brute force against your wife is OPPRESSION!
Under Islam, wives are also given the right to beat their husbands if they don't uphold their obligations to their wives and families, although much more indirectly through the courts. I mean after all, if you have someone else do it on your behalf, you are just as responsible for the assault as if you did it yourself.
Unfortunately there is really nothing a wife can do if her husband doesnt perform his duties,you just accept it.
@@nailanoorein2086 yes If you are dumb and stupid, than that’s what you do sister. Some women on the other hand are brave and confidente and get out of an abusive marriage..
@@nailanoorein2086 is this fucking real? drop the verse now.
@@noneOfUrBussines12 no, if the husband is a loser, just divorce him. why you gotta beat his worthless behind anyway
Thanks for being honest.
Lunatic obsessed with Islam
@@TheGOAT-dr1sq so many lies that why we are reaching for answers
@@samuelrigaud6595
The beating is not a hard beating with a belt it’s a slap with the palm not on the face on the body…. It’s not meant to cause severe pain or damage if it does then the wife can divorce the husband
@@samuelrigaud6595
If the wife commits so non noble actions and the husband has already been warning her and she continues then he may proceed to resort to hiring her cus he is the top of the family and he most protect the family and he is the one with authority over his wife and kids and he has authority over the wife just like Mother has authority over kids….
@@TheGOAT-dr1sq and what if the man makes problems? Can the wife also hit him?? If not then I must be re-thinking about converting lol
Men are in charge of women by [right of] what allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, allah is ever exalted and grand.
Wth Daníel it doesn’t say beat to submission it says strike the word in Arabic doesn’t mean beat your woman at all I saw somewhere that is not allowed to beat your wife in Islam
@Ceiling Fan ?
@Ceiling Fan I am ? How is that related to this comment
@Allapjalla well sister if you are from the west,just be grateful for what you have,if you were born a muslim girl in a muslim famiky then you would never have converted to islam
@Ceiling Fan what are u on about ?!! lol
A really beautiful explanation... you succeded to make the listener reach a conclusion that in some contexts "beating wife" would be a necessity for marriage to continue.
While other weak Sheikhs do their best to reach the conclusion of "the beating is not that hard, people :')"
Your stupid logic is this: wife beating is a way to keep the wife?
@@Earthling108
?!
Regardless of the way you rephrased my words... Did you even watch the video?
It's like you go to baseball match, buy a ticket, have a seat among Yankees fans, and ask one of them: "wHaT teAm aRe yOu cHEeRiNg fOr?!"
@@ibrahim47 answer the question
😂
👏🏻 your answer so strong and clear this is the amazing about it I wasn’t expecting that you really answered in very simple why for a question many they consider it as something needs to much power to understand it
بارك الله فيكم
May Allah give me wealth so that I can donate as much as I can to Alasna Institution. Say Ameeen
Daniel have you ever beat Umm Khalid?
But brother Daniel, I think you are the one who still don't understand Harris point of the argument.. is snail haram? what about kangoroo??
XD
Jazakom Allah khaira brother
I have a good way of explaining this verse too. It's really blown out of proportion
I would like to hear it. I truly would
For the summary: make sure you don't wound em physically nor even mentally. even anomaly and papanomaly likes to beat each other out of their childish behavior.
That was a really good response and obviously snailtan with his small brain could not answer it. However, it would have been great if you had just added the context of this verse. I mean these conmen makes it look like that wife beating is the 1st option when it isn't. There are precedents to this & it's the last resort. Also the extent of beating is also very clearly explained in hadith. If it is coupled with this argument then it would make much greater sense.
Agreed bhai
For the point you mentioned bhai you can checkout the answer given by Nouman Ali khan.
@@aadil4787 bhai I know the answer. What i am saying if he had coupled this with his answer it would have given a complete picture.
By Allah's permission only Daniel can defeat himself
جزاك الله خيرا ❤️
Yup this debate is now being used by Atheists, they quote that this is how horrible Islam actually is and being given all sorts of flavours.
I have encountered several on UA-cam quoting this debate
because Daniel is an idiot and his logic is flawed and he clearly does not understand how human nature works and how Qur'an deals with it.
Now I know how a delirium sounds like.
Allahu Akbar
Ultimate authority is given to the state to ensure there is justice, that is why the judicial system is called the justice system, but the laws are made by the people via officials they elect
Nobody is saying is wrong to use force on women to enforce the law. The problem is the law itself. You shouldn’t have the right to assault anybody except for the case of self defense of life or property. If you spouse is acting an a way that you disapprove of but she’s not killing or destroying property then divorce her. But beating her will not solve anything and would probably just create distrust and enmity in the marriage.
@Ceiling Fan an example of self defense?
@Ceiling Fan if a wife takes a gun and threatens to kill someone. Not if the wife didn’t make dinner one night
@Ceiling Fan Daniel doesn’t seem to know anything about family in the first place. He acts like power to the husband is the most important thing. Acting like that destroys family’s, doesn’t fix them. I know this from personal experience. Also domestic violence destroys family. It negatively impacts the children and the wife.
@@DominoRenzo lmao actually it's vice versa, the husband as the main leader and sustainer of the family is very effective and look at Islamic families we increasing in numbers and our fertility rates are high sky unlike secular communities who constantly need immigration XD
@@DominoRenzo and no , beating a rebellious screaming degrading wife after all the peaceful solutions has certain conditions " you don't need cops aka stranger men to physically force her into staying calm "
Doesn't leave a mark " so can't be server like a freaking fight " , not on the face , doesn't lead to harm
Wife in Islam is taken care of financially and she doesn't need to participate in anything financially and she has the freedom to ask for divorce if she doesn't want to obey certain norms within the family and want to become atheist for example XD
Managers don't beat employees. Employees resigns or managers sack before such thing occur.
If they fire them and the they don't leave, they do have the right to beat them.
@@johns3927
Lols. They will call the police to maintain corporate order instead of causing avoidable chaos in the work environment.
@@religion_philosophynow Yeah, if you have someone else do something, you are responsible for that happening.
@@johns3927
Someone else do what?
Who is doing what?
Be explicit
@@religion_philosophynow Corporate leaders sending in security.
I’m on team PikaChad. I support Brother Daniel 100%. 😎👍
Brother Daniel why did you choose the same moderator for tomorrow’s debate?! Very dissapointed…
Husband and wife at home , questions: Who is the Judge? Who interprets the law? Who inflicts the penalty? Is there a case when the wife can beat the husband?
Can you arrest police officers if he break the law
@@DominoRenzo I don't think so ...
Do you think that women she will be arrested if she refuses to wear seatbelt??
@@albgs2963 not even in islam you can beat your wife if she does not wear seat belt , just hear the man.
@@albgs2963yes you can, and he can get a criminal record and he can lose his job. There is a whole establishment that can hold an officer accountable. If a husband beats his wife that is not there
Of course of course islam without shadow of a doubt is theeeeee most reasonable logical religion for every human
Daniel Haqiqatou does not understand the difference between formal and informal relationship or formal and informal communication.
Yah
Harris also doesn't understand the difference between formal oppression and informal oppression
Formal patriarchy and informal patriarchy,
Formal rape and informal rape
Formal crime and informal crime
🤣🤣
Listen the argument carefully or take someone help who has that capacity
@@ahnafrashik
Rape is a crime. It's government that handles be it male or female perpetuator. Husband does not need to resort to beating in domestic misunderstanding. Daniel is mistaking formal relationship like employment and legal case for informal relationship like marriage.
Governments don't beat wives. Governments punish offenders of the law according to how jurisdiction appropriate justice. Daniel is so desperate to have said that it's government that does wife beating on behalf of husband in liberal society. Nobody is government's wife. All are citizens with duties and rights.
Thank you for saying this! This DH guy and his awful analogies.
You are right brother
Some atheists like 🐌 HPuss 🐌 and his supporters can’t get it. They are intellectually immature.
i think ull should listen to simon sinek.. he explains relationships much better. women may love the macho man or a wife beater lol but are they happy?? nah they regret it. sure they like a man who is a leader and takes charge but a true leader is a person that listens and reasons with the people of the family or co-operation, not beat them up or fire them for not meeting some imaginary targets. men and women shld not strive to aim for authority.. aim for fucking respect and earn it. not through force but my the way u carry urselves. seriously listen to simon sinek. there is more compassion and reason in his talk.
@@mysteriousportal7077 simple. People like you call everyone idiot and worship one person like they are God. Even though i completely disagree with Daniel at least I refer to him by his name n not call him an idiot. Second... People like you are completely null of any sense n agree to anything that fits your narrative. Third Simon sinek is just overall better.. lol bet that hurts you
So where is the Islamic passage that states a woman should beat her husband when he is disobedient and immoral? 😂 I can't believe you drew a parallel between Islam permitting a husband to physically punish his wife to a cop arresting a criminal in the act. Wow.
Violating the law is a lot harder to do than violating Islamic values as a woman. If your wife does not wear her Hijab correctly one day, you are within your right to beat her. If she disobeys her husbands command, travels anywhere alone, or even LOOKS at another man let alone touches them, It is then permissible to beat them. This happens everyday is Islamic households and Islamic countries.
You talk about comparing apples and oranges, but I just watched you do exactly that again, and again, and again.
If you love Islam and Islamic countries so much, then why do you not move to an Islamic country? Why stay here in the Christian country of America where we believe in freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and preventing things such as spousal abuse and wife beating?
father can discipline children because he is in charge same with husband
My God another woman that has a hard time understanding. He cannot beat his wife for her not wearing hijab for one day. If you listened you would have heard that he must advice her first then if she persist then do not share a bed with her. I didn’t read anything you said past that because you absolutely had no understanding of this video & the ln proceeded to talk about something you don’t have a clue on smh.
@@taimurahmadSo you are OK with your father beating your mother because he fears that your mother will be disobedient?
@@HAQQ1st actually he can beat his wife for anything of he personally deems it as disobedient and so he is even more justified to do so if she is doing haram
@@taimurahmad your answer is husband can beat their wives because they have the right to authority.
Women are not children, and beating children is also abuse.
What exactly is the husband in charge of? Not getting his whims satisfied? Explain what he’s in charge of that justifies subjecting his wife, an adult, to physical violence. Would men accept being controlled and beaten by their wives, like they were by their parents when they were kids and feel respected?
Jazakallah khair for bringing the hypocrisy of this so called women's rights, feminism absurdity. Allahu baraka fik...
He did talk about punishment and that stuff, but I want to ask him "In what ways does a woman (wife) break the laws and what exactly are those laws?".
Rebellion. IF your wife attacks you and attempts to kill you for no reason, then you can defend yourself. If your wife cheats, then you can use beating as THE LAST RESORT. Speak to her first, if it doesn't work, don't sleep with her, if it doesn't work, then you have the right to beat your wife, because it will establish equality in the family, and prevent your wife from falling astray. But if your wife forgot something so simple, it's love and mercy that should prevail. It makes no sense to admonish your wife or even beat your wife for such a simple mistake.
@@chillmode1881 That's reasonable. JazakAllah.
It can be anything.
Moral corruption, cheating, Disobeying the Husband in Good things, Or physical assault.
@@chillmode1881 what if the husband does all that? Cheat.. try ti kill her.. etc.
@@galagainstterror There is a comprehensive ruling for that in the Islamic Law. I have no knowledge of it as of the moment. You can research it up but don't expect to get the full details because topics like these aren't mostly accesible online. We have books for them that aren't popular in Google nor the West. But, if you ask enough people and research enough, you'll get the answer
لقد كنت رائعا جدا في الدفاع عن المسلمون وليس الاسلام , لان الاسلام يحفظه الله تعالى . استمر بقوة وبشراسة , فلا تراجع ولا استسلام . تعجبني دائما فيديوهاتك , ولكن لي راجاء عندك ان يكون هناك نرجمة للغة العربية , اعرف انك نعرف عربي وانا عربي واعرف الانجابزبة , لذا فاستطيع ان اشاهد فيديوهاتك فهي قيمة لذا الترجمة ضرورية جدا , وخصوصا هذه الايام , فالحرب على المسلمين هي خرب معرفة فقط , وليس عقول فالعقل بيد الله تعالى ولا يستطيع احد ان يتلاعب به او يعيره . والسلام عليكم
respond as a Christian Teacher. At the (12:00pm) mark within his allleged, "SECULAR ANALOGY" of (SURA 4:34), he uses a very UNBALANCED SECULAR METAPHOR of a (CORPORATION POSITIONAL & WORKPLACE LEADERSHIP) example, to align with what HE is convinced as an EXAMPLE, of what the believed Allah/Al-ilah....is conveying within (SURA 4:34)... Then states.... this...not of the BELIEVED QURAN, OF THE QURANIC BELIEVING WORLD. OR ANY OF THE BELIEVE "HA-DITHS"................."HE THEN SAYS.....
1. FAMILY IS ALSO TO BE LIKE....................THIS.
2. A exampletic comparision of the LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE OF A SECULAR, SECULAR CORPORATION, EXPLAINS (SURA 4:32).. So indirectly to say, Sura 4:34 needs the example measure analogy of a world organization to explain..BEATING ONE'S WIFE...
3. QUESTION, if willing to have the discussion..CAN ARROGANCE BE.............."ALSO"...found in Mankind....ASK ADAM, first created HUMAN & MAN..........WHEN HE PLACED DISOBEDIANCE UPON HIS WIFE EVE..................WHEN THE COMMAND WAS GIVEN................................................TO HIM.... You noticed displacement of the World did NOT HAPPEN UNTIL ADAM ATE OF THE FRIUT..............NOT EVE..AND SHE ATE OF IT .............FIRST... Lets discuss it civilly...NO IDEOLOGIES, OR LOGIC..........JUST QURANIC knowledge, and or Ha-dith..cool!!
@@timcreekmur2770 it is very difficult to answer u fully here. But (1) Adam & eve never ever eat (in the QURAN), they TASTE a fruit, & tasting is never as eating as u know, (2) Yes , there is beating in the QURAN, BUT u have to take it withing the context of QURANIC raising of children, NOT as NONISLAAMIC raising. Otherwise no one will have EDRAAK of this. NOW, to have EDRAAK of this, u have to have it from TADABBOR of the QURAN & SONNAH DIRECTLY from them & NOT from any HUMAN BEING. WHY??? because COMPREHENSION of any one DEPENDS on his\her knowledge, & this is HOW ALLAAAH (SWT) CREATE the human ie, FITRAH. THANX
@@nafsology3681. Peace. I appreciate your response. Let's go over your burden of Historical Authenticated, carbon-dated, and you will need.
With the Word of God/ Bible, existing before the believed Quranic Text, you must NOW, present historical evidence that the book of GENESIS, say that Adam and his wife Eve, ate of the fruit, for it WENT INTO THEIR MOUTH, also. present evidence that the FIRST BOOK OF THE "TORAH/TARAT", is not the presently existing biblical Torah, before we move on, therefore establishing WHERE the believed Quran's evidence of refuting the Biblical book of Genesis' wording.. No logic, or simply..BECAUSE THE QURAN SAID IT. for that presents a "PLAGERIZED" Quran?
@@timcreekmur2770 i advice you to read in depth on carbon dating and other methods of dating. thanx
@@timcreekmur2770 there is ONLY ONE RELIGION from ALLAAAH (SWT), Which is ISLAAM. I know you deny that, I do NOT care. thanx
I have a question :when can a man beat his wife
Alsl most importantly.if he beat hos wife where she did nothing wrong,what are the repercussions for that
Also,say a muslim woman is going through violent domestic abuse,what can she do to leave as she cant leave her house without her husbands permisssion ?
She is allowed to get a divorce if he doesn't give her permission to go out.
@@flowerpower7645 bullshit...there is a reason she needs to take permission and it's because it's Haram for him to say no
Beating and firing an employee are the same thing?
The threat of violence through a security/police officer is present IF the employee (female) does not comply (obey the rules) with leaving the premise. And the threat of violence can range from forcibly being picked-up and thrown out all the way to being killed. Whereas the muslim husband's threat of violence is relatively extremely constrained (such as can't hit the face, not leave a mark/injury etc.)
@@essakhan1575 Utter nonsense... There is no comparison. Police has to greatly restrain itself. I am 50. I never had anyone around me who received any kind of violence from police. Also you can not normalize police beating and killing which most of the time regarded as use of disproportionate force. In contrast, domestic abuse is a social disease which is extremely wide-spread. It starts with wife beating and ends in murder. Any discourse that condones and justifies domestic abuse is dangerous.
If I were a Muslim women to marry, I would put a phrase in the marriage contract that the marriage will be annulled if he ever hits me. I am an able individual. I am my own person. I am not anybody's property. I make my own decisions. If a husband does like them, he can divorce me but I ill never allow anybody hitting me.
@Ceiling Fan There is no comparison between a police and a husband. Police is under state control and 100% accountable for its actions. Police can be inspected and scrutinized if they do anything wrong. Police can be dismisses if they are mistaken.
@Ceiling Fan Police is under systematic investigation. Not all women have means to file a complaint about their husbands. Women will be greatly disadvantaged. There is no comparison between a public officer and a domestic situation behind the doors.
according to your secular undestanding. what if a police man abuses his power? similarly husband is brought accountable by islaamic lw@@heavenlymilano
yes, lets assume all women are criminal and treat them as such...
Clearly did not watch the vid at all. This wasn’t about all women but the small few who display arrogance.
@@inosvvke5664 you think a woman not obeying ber husband whims is a criminal?
I think we all know that we could and have the right to beat our wife's but who have done it? I am 20 years married and it never came to my mind to beat my wife. Of course there are always exceptions but it is not common.
@Wish Princess Charming Was Real dude wife that need beating (according to Quran/Sunnah) or direct divorce is like ex wife of johnny depp, Amber...
Allah provides solution for everything. If the matter didn’t arise in your family then you are blessed but not family is like yours.
Masculinity is haram in the post-modern world.
Edit: This literally haram, but made haram (impermissible) by post-modernity. Post-modernity reverses haram and halal.
not at all
That is literally the most obvious argument yet the "humanists" don't seem to understand it ,and keep asking the exact same dumb question
Well done Haqiqatjou 👌
Anyone who study and understand Islam will end up like this guy or end up as an atheist
An atheist that believes nothing becomes something has even more faith than religion
And good riddance if they leave allah will only replace them with better reverts
Yep this is the modern westernized woman, childless, husband less, but of course highly sexualized, arrogant, suffering from psychotic depression...and on...
I grew up im the middle east and there are many depressed women over here,walked upon,trampled upon,but they dont get mental help of any kind sadly.
I know as there are women in my family with nobway out who lived life like this,where they are not a human being as a woman,as awell person of their own,they have only been objects used and discarded
But why do such women concern you
They do not harm you
There are many men lkke that too,depressed arrigant psychotic and they too die alone
You focus on bettering yourself thsoe women are not hurting you in anyway.they do not concern you
Beating is Haraam
and IS only allowed in Extreme conditions and with something the same as Miswak lol
Yes but Daniel here is destroying the whole argument of beating is wrong instead of explaining
(as a last resort as stated in Quran) Beating should be done, only be as light as it doesn't leave a mark(according to hadith) but what's the source of as same as miswak?
@@aswitnessedbythelenses963 *‘Ata’ said: I said to Ibn ‘Abbaas, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, Hitting with a siwaak and the like. [A siwaak is a small stick or twig used for cleaning the teeth - Translator] *
Beating is Haram ???? Really Only for men or women also?
What kind of joke is that?
If you wife cheats you nd attacks you , still You cant do anything because its haram. Thats idiocy on your part
@@wannabesage5870 bro if she cheat she will get lashed by the law why even bother doing anything to her tell the authority because she could call for domestic abuse just take a shot and give that to the judge
Mashallah the analogy is so beautiful 😍❤️
In a town,a sudden explosion of marriage crisis occurs and people decided to check what the so called religious were dabbling on social media. They discovered this post/message,their standard emotional one liner preaching.
"It's the right of a woman to demand the Mahr of her choice"
The information is correct. Islam says give woman what they asked.But if the woman don't know what to ask and men don't even know how this contribute to the bond,this kind of preaching will contribute to fasaad.
If people are told about the "bond" granted by Allah,they may ask " You mean, some kind of wifi connection"?
That's why people are so sceptical of other so called Islamic solutions.
Lesson is,don't play with religious texts.General people need in depth clarification according to their perception level
MashaAllah beautifully put
you keep talking about the rules that women shouldn’t break in order to not be physically hurt, what are these rules? Also isn’t there a hadith about the prophet not hurting a single fly
@Ceiling Fan so if the wife doesn’t cook, should she be beaten?
@Ceiling Fan But that’s disobeying the husband and Quran 4:34 says to beat your wife if she disobeys you.
@Ceiling Fan plus I don’t think you should be constantly defending domestic violence.
@Ceiling Fan why not just divorce her and move on and get a new wife and beating in islam is like beating with miswaak not like mehdi tidjani and others that Daniel supported and how can u imagine a healthy relationship when u always want to beat or emotionally abuse your wife if she raised her voice for example like she's not human being and she's your dog ?!! And isn't it not fair that allah created women weaker than men but also give the men the right to beat them and he gave the men much stronger physique and men using that to abuse women ?!! And plus men are allowed to have up to four wives so why not just leave her ?!! And u also get 72 virgins in heaven like u guys have so much power in islam and u still want to abuse women
@Ceiling Fan u keep saying man's rights like for ex if she denied him intercorse cause she's tired after a long day of home work or cause she's not in the mood , how is that going to damage the marriage if he just waited till the next day lol why not be patient and put excuse for your wife , you're exaggerating , it doesn't have to be always rough , and why you don't want me to bring mehdi tidjani here lol if Daniel himself talked to him that's a sign of support to an abusive husband and father and kept insulting single mothers and divorced ones , even non Muslims called him out while a lot of Muslim men including Daniel and the 3 Muslims and others took him as a role model , he's the last one that Muslim men should be taking advise from lol what a shame , and when u say she raised her voice on him it's not like he's gonna be quite or sumn so why go physical to " disciplining " her and at the same time u agree that islam did not permit beating towards women , are u contradicting urself ??? And why not divorce and move on?? And when i mentioned that domestic violence in marriage can will never lead to a healthy marriage what does that have to do with u saying that it's hard to find partner ? It's about who will accept to live under abuse not about searching for a wife and paying the mahr !! and how does that can damage him psychologically when he can divorce her men are more capable of having another wife easily and moving on , and if you're struggling in finding one even then when u find her ubbetter be thankful not to abuse her and make think she came as to be ordered only and " disciplined " and to to be look down as inferior creature
people just needs to understand basic logic. some people already are decided on their preconceived notion and don't care about logic.
Poland and France they solved alot of problems