The Rise Of Wind Power In The U.S.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2024
  • In the past decade, wind power capacity has tripled, and it’s projected to double in the decades to come. Wind is now America’s top renewable source of electricity generation, and the domestic offshore industry is finally taking off, as major manufacturers debut ever larger and more powerful turbines. While the industry faces some challenges with permitting, public opposition from various interest groups, and the obvious intermittency issues, there’s no doubt that wind is poised to play a major role in the energy transition. The question is just how fast it will grow.
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    » Subscribe to CNBC Classic: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedI...
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/Instagr...
    Subscribe to CNBC PRO: cnb.cx/2NLi9AN
    #CNBC
    The Rise Of Wind Power In The U.S.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @ShashankData
    @ShashankData 3 роки тому +431

    Is it just me or do I think wind turbines look kinda cool? I wouldn’t mind seeing one outside my house.

    • @Listenimtooshyalright
      @Listenimtooshyalright 3 роки тому +18

      reading your name gave me a stroke

    • @danielretardo7075
      @danielretardo7075 3 роки тому +1

      indian

    • @addiosnia
      @addiosnia 3 роки тому +32

      They look cool, but they are loud

    • @tamishgoyal5962
      @tamishgoyal5962 3 роки тому +51

      Yeah but you wouldn't want to live near one.... They are loud and the construction and maintenance is always there. They work best in unhabitabed areas.

    • @Joel-ee4yh
      @Joel-ee4yh 3 роки тому +13

      They're loud asf..... and maintenance can be a pain

  • @DyslexicMitochondria
    @DyslexicMitochondria 3 роки тому +230

    I once asked a windmill "what kind of music do you like". It said "Im a huge metal fan"

    • @mattearenzi8972
      @mattearenzi8972 3 роки тому +7

      I was intrigued by your username so I clicked on your channel. Your channel is a hidden gem

    • @Powers3rg
      @Powers3rg 3 роки тому +8

      Dad! Please stop commenting on random UA-cam videos!

    • @danielretardo7075
      @danielretardo7075 3 роки тому

      Hey bro I watch your videos. Nice to see you here

    • @ricnyc2759
      @ricnyc2759 3 роки тому

      And then you fell off the bed and woke up?

    • @Willybean08
      @Willybean08 3 роки тому

      @@mattearenzi8972 Just did that too

  • @PolicyThwonk
    @PolicyThwonk 3 роки тому +354

    With the rise in renewable generation, I'm also looking forward to the rise in storage and grid improvements, which is really needed for them to achieve their true potential.

    • @reheyesd8666
      @reheyesd8666 3 роки тому +2

      Definitely, power grid issues when EVS are being charged 24/7 might be an issue.

    • @James-ln6li
      @James-ln6li 3 роки тому +19

      @@reheyesd8666 definitely could be possible, but also think about it another way. Your EV is also a giant battery. In the evening when you come home from work you might be able to sell energy from your EV back to the grid for a profit then recharge early next morning before you go to work when wind and solar are producing excess energy at a cheaper price!

    • @UnipornFrumm
      @UnipornFrumm 3 роки тому +2

      We have tesla making mega packs

    • @James-ln6li
      @James-ln6li 3 роки тому +18

      @Calvin Parish over wants to keep burning things like a caveman because he has never heard of technological improvements.
      Dude wake up... Look at how much longer a batter lasts in a phone. The technology is improving rapidly. You are an outdated fool. Go tell at some kids to get off your lawn boomer.

    • @arconte2100
      @arconte2100 3 роки тому +3

      In the short term Gas peakers are an acceptable substitute for battery storage, Denmark is also investing heavily in hydrogen generation from wind power to store energy. Also in many areas there is hydro and nuclear to compliment wind and solar.

  • @karliebellatrixyoung6359
    @karliebellatrixyoung6359 3 роки тому +64

    Anywhere that is permitted for offshore oil exploration and extraction should also be by default permitted for offshore wind.

    • @Nill757
      @Nill757 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah wind turbines don’t work so well in mile deep water, 100 miles offshore. Maybe try something simpler, ie growing your own food before trying to run the energy industry from your desktop.

  • @Coolbreeze0988
    @Coolbreeze0988 3 роки тому +123

    I love seeing these huge windmill farms when driving across the country. Idk why people would think they’re ugly

    • @joshloschen1653
      @joshloschen1653 3 роки тому +21

      Especially in boring drives through midwest states like Nebraska and Iowa, the windmills are the best part of the drive.

    • @JW4REnvironment
      @JW4REnvironment 3 роки тому +6

      I agree. I like the look and give thanks when I drive by the clean energy sources because they will make my son’ lives better by slowing climate change.

    • @BeaverChainsaw
      @BeaverChainsaw 3 роки тому +6

      Yeah sometimes I see them in the california desert and let me tell you, it's definitely more interesting than looking at mounds of sand

    • @sebys1414
      @sebys1414 3 роки тому +3

      @Retro Beast compared to fossil fuels they’ve killed minimal birds

    • @top10cars2
      @top10cars2 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah, I think that they look good, too

  • @eaaeeeea
    @eaaeeeea 3 роки тому +50

    I saw a wind farm with huge turbines in a desolate area along a train track I travelled on. I found the huge turbines quite beautiful and mesmerizing. I love to see more of them built!

    • @terenceiutzi4003
      @terenceiutzi4003 2 роки тому +1

      Ok we can have them all built in your back yard and you live with the pollution and Infasound!

    • @kirkbarber4040
      @kirkbarber4040 Рік тому +2

      Just remember it kills a lot of birds

    • @pradeep128
      @pradeep128 Рік тому

      @@kirkbarber4040you know what else kills birds? Coal and natural gas.

    • @survivor6302
      @survivor6302 10 місяців тому

      birds deaths by turbine is very minimal@@kirkbarber4040

  • @enesimajebi2935
    @enesimajebi2935 3 роки тому +553

    Nobody:
    Americans: It's bigger than a football field!

    • @cabiediger09
      @cabiediger09 3 роки тому +44

      wait... that's not a standard unit of measurement?

    • @blainegabbertgabonemhofgoa6602
      @blainegabbertgabonemhofgoa6602 3 роки тому +13

      @@cabiediger09 it is. 50 yards (46 meters) by 100 yards (91 meters)

    • @blainegabbertgabonemhofgoa6602
      @blainegabbertgabonemhofgoa6602 3 роки тому +21

      @@cabiediger09 jokes aside, 1 football field is essentially 1 acre

    • @cabiediger09
      @cabiediger09 3 роки тому +3

      Hmmm you learn something new everyday. 🙂

    • @makatron
      @makatron 3 роки тому +12

      It's easier with a population that mostly doesn't know nor care how many yards in a mile or any sub units

  • @makatron
    @makatron 3 роки тому +204

    Yeah those turbines didn't have the cold weather package to heat up the inner parts, and now they're complaining after they went to the cheaper route.

    • @mateosanchez1823
      @mateosanchez1823 3 роки тому +10

      Well, how many times does it snow in Texas? Rougly once every 65 years? I think it makes total sense getting the cheap ones

    • @nihouma11
      @nihouma11 3 роки тому +36

      @@mateosanchez1823 Winter storms regularly happen in the northern parts of the state. Storms like what happened in 2021 are more rare, but it still happens. When i was in dallas, an ice storm was normally a one every year event. The panhandle, where a lot of texas wind is, experiences more frequent freezes compared to the rest of the state

    • @makatron
      @makatron 3 роки тому +14

      @Calvin Parish yeah not thst I've work on them or anything mate.

    • @makatron
      @makatron 3 роки тому +15

      @@mateosanchez1823 my point is exactly if they didn't get the heaters because was a calculated risk, still a sizable risk they're gambling with.

    • @SDGreg
      @SDGreg 3 роки тому +29

      @@mateosanchez1823 The had the same issue in 2011 with freezing power plants. However if you don't winterize your power infrastructure don't then turn around and scape-goat wind-turbines because they failed when you didn't winterize them. The fact the wind-turbines failed had nothing to do with renewable energy. Any powersource can fail in cold weather without proper winterizing. However how much do you want to pay to prepare for a "black swan" event. I think Texas is having those discussions right now.

  • @FinancialShinanigan
    @FinancialShinanigan 3 роки тому +99

    Holy crap, didn't realize how long the blades were!

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому +8

      The wings of an Airbus A380 are childsplay to the size of wind turbines!

    • @spookymanbearpig
      @spookymanbearpig 3 роки тому +5

      Have in mind that when they say "rotor size" they mean the diameter the blades sweep, not the length of each individual blade (or the radius).

    • @akyhne
      @akyhne 3 роки тому +4

      In 2011 I worked on a team building the largest blades in the world, with a length of 73,5 meters.
      The largest blades today are around 100 meters or almost the length of an American football field (120 yards).

    • @71kimg
      @71kimg 3 роки тому +4

      And they produce more electricity than smaller turbines - not just in megawatt capacity but also reaching capacity much more often - as far I remember max capacity 50% of time and producing electricity 80% of times for the best/largest wind farms

  • @alexcadream3097
    @alexcadream3097 3 роки тому +39

    I just love how cool wind turbines look tho

  • @gussince1971
    @gussince1971 3 роки тому +18

    I live in Rhode Island and its pretty cool to see blades from TPI Composites roll down the highway

  • @cdcurry1203
    @cdcurry1203 3 роки тому +37

    I can understand why some would not want the wind turbines near their homes due to noise but they also wouldn't want to live near a coal fired power plant so it is probably best to try and place the turbines in an area that isn't so close to peoples homes just like a power plant. Also I heard if the turbine blades are painted a certain way it reduces the amount of birds flying into them.

    • @aarone9000
      @aarone9000 Рік тому +3

      Its no more noisy then liveing near a freeway; and people do that all across the country!

    • @50jakecs
      @50jakecs Рік тому +2

      @@aarone9000 Or train tracks. Or an airport.

  • @SlinkyFromHell.4
    @SlinkyFromHell.4 3 роки тому +17

    Here in Tulsa, OK our manufacturing is booming because they build the metal pole sections that hold up the turbine here and our highways are new and large enough to transport the poles around town. It's really a sight to see, they're HUGE.

  • @MillionaireMindsetClub
    @MillionaireMindsetClub 3 роки тому +48

    Blaming the frozen wind turbines for the power outage is just not true. It was bad management for years.

    • @chloedegurechaff1941
      @chloedegurechaff1941 3 роки тому +12

      Unregulated private companies man, they be do that.

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 3 роки тому

      And frozen wind turbines. Wind only works 30% of the time anyway. A huge waste of money.

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому +2

      Ya all the powerscours went our coal, oil, win, and nuclear because the Texas grid failed it was just wind turbines & wind turbines can even work in Antarctica so ya

    • @hameedullahkhan4441
      @hameedullahkhan4441 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheBandit7613 Source?

    • @akyhne
      @akyhne 3 роки тому +5

      @@TheBandit7613 A huge waste of money? Why is it then that it's one of the cheapest forms of electricity you can get?
      Besides, wind turbines almost always rotate to some degree. They can turn the blades, according to the amount of wind.
      They only really stop working, when there's no wind at all or too much wind.
      I think you may be thinking on small garden wind turbines for hobbyists.. or you just don't know squat about wind turbines.

  • @MrGrombie
    @MrGrombie 3 роки тому +32

    12:00 God forbid the rich people have to see spin wheels off in the distance...

    • @brucec954
      @brucec954 3 роки тому +4

      Oil platforms were/are built just offshore from LA and the Gulf Coast and didn't hear opposition even though they risk oil spills washing up on their beach.

    • @zedantXiang
      @zedantXiang 3 роки тому +1

      OH yeah the classic Oh no I can see wind turbine,I prefer to have my property drowned instead .
      YOu guys are sick.

  • @charliewesterfield5262
    @charliewesterfield5262 3 роки тому +24

    Because oil isn’t problematic? Like where is the arguement....

    • @ThomasBomb45
      @ThomasBomb45 3 роки тому +3

      The natural gas pipelines shut down... because the pipes weren't winterized. The problem isnt wind, it's the failure of unregulated private industry putting profits before people

  • @Peter-rp1cm
    @Peter-rp1cm 3 роки тому +65

    Wind turbine works fine here in cold Northern Europe, just remember to put a checkmark at the winter package when buying new tubines Texas!. :D

    • @Brandon_letsgo
      @Brandon_letsgo 3 роки тому

      I'm not sure. People in Europe paying twice or even three times more for electricity. Looking the latest data from the U.K indicates that wind is so unreliable that natural gas is being used to generate around 90% of all demand. Plus, U.K is importing more and more electricity from neighbor countries. What a shame a wealth and developed country importing 11% of its electricity on a regular basis.

    • @DerpSenpai
      @DerpSenpai 3 роки тому +7

      @@Brandon_letsgo 30% of my countries electricity is Wind and we export (60% renewables atm), we don't import energy. you just spewed some bs. keep being a sheep to major companies interests in burning oil

    • @Brandon_letsgo
      @Brandon_letsgo 3 роки тому

      @@DerpSenpai Where you from?

    • @charlesbridgford254
      @charlesbridgford254 3 роки тому +2

      @@Brandon_letsgo Not sure where your figures are from?
      Looking at the Ofgem website from last year:
      It's about 35% from natural gas, 20% nuclear, 40% renewables and 5% imports in the UK.

    • @iareid8255
      @iareid8255 3 роки тому

      Charles,
      a large part of the U.K.'s renewables is Drax which is a consistent generator (Burning wood pellets) but it is completely wrong to categorise it as renewable. More smoke and mirrors from teh government. It's CO2 output per Mwatt hour is far higher than coal due to alower thermal efficiency.
      Germany and the U.K. have some of the highest unit costs of electricity in Europe and the world due to these technically defficient souces of power.

  • @blancavelasquez9859
    @blancavelasquez9859 3 роки тому +60

    even in my state of missouri the utility company is planning on being 100% renewable by 2050

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому +8

      And Hawaii is planning on being fully renewable too which is good

    • @autodidact537
      @autodidact537 3 роки тому +2

      It's time to find out what the people at the utility company are smoking. lol

    • @GhostStealth590
      @GhostStealth590 3 роки тому +2

      Ameren? I wouldn’t hold my breath to that, even 30 years from now.

    • @blancavelasquez9859
      @blancavelasquez9859 3 роки тому +3

      @@GhostStealth590 they certainly are buying wind farms in the state they’re already the largest wind producer plus they’re a very big company with deep pockets i’m sure with federal help it will help streamline the process

    • @rond5936
      @rond5936 3 роки тому +2

      They can't. The only renewable they can get to by 2050 is Nuclear. Wind and solar are just a waste if everybody's time.

  • @dailydoseofmedicinee
    @dailydoseofmedicinee 3 роки тому +19

    Interesting Facts About Wind Energy👍
    Wind energy was first developed with windmills in 200 BC in Persia and China.
    Wind energy was then used for hundreds of years to pump water and crush grain.
    The first modern turbine was built in Vermont in the 1940s.
    Turbine towers normally stand over 328 ft tall.
    Each turbine blade is normally 260 ft long.

    • @zbynekII
      @zbynekII 3 роки тому +3

      Well, you almost got it right except that first modern turbine was built in Yalta, USSR in 1931.

  • @SCL111
    @SCL111 3 роки тому +13

    Texas lost its power because the state refused to winter-proof its facilities and its electrical grid is totally isolated from the other two major interconnected nationwide electricity grids because Texas doesn't want to be govern by policies other than their own. So now, electricity cannot be directed from other states to Texas causing days of blackouts, pipe burst, and death. Texas is so far south of North America. Do you ever wonder why other states that are far closer to the Arctic aren't as affected by the cold front as Texas?

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому +3

      It's because States above the Florida borderline have a higher degree of anti-ice and winterproofing for all sectors.
      *Also, should I mention that all American states without Texas actually work together(Yes even Canadian provinces help American states too) to aid each other for economic benefits?!*
      EX:
      -All states North and North east of Pennsylvania share interstate passenger railway lines(amtrak, PATH, and MTA share interstate lines)
      -Niagra falls provides electricity to not only Canadian Ontario province, but it also feeds power to NE American states.
      -Hoover Dam is a power source to not only it's home state Nevada, but it actually spreads its power to California, New Mexico, and Utah!

  • @ellalex12
    @ellalex12 3 роки тому +235

    Imagine complaining that a wind turbine looks ugly.

    • @OneNewHope
      @OneNewHope 3 роки тому +60

      Coal smoke stacks are super pretty though...

    • @UnipornFrumm
      @UnipornFrumm 3 роки тому +7

      @@OneNewHope yeah there is a gigan coal power plant in my town,it has 5 boilers i think.
      Its not nice at all,but at least its turned off for a long time now, years...i gues coal is more expensive then wind all the way in Scotland, as i live in england

    • @briandavis849
      @briandavis849 3 роки тому +8

      they are ugly in large numbers. West Texas looks ridiculous

    • @huskiefan06
      @huskiefan06 3 роки тому

      @Calvin Parish Good point!

    • @paulg8065
      @paulg8065 3 роки тому +24

      @Calvin Parish lol yes because aluminum is not recyclable. Not sure why people are so behind dirty energy, like your kids aren’t going to live on this planet.

  • @dodiewallace41
    @dodiewallace41 2 роки тому +1

    I am pro decarbonizing hence I am pro nuclear power. NP is the gold standard of clean energy. It’s as clean and safe as any alternative, requires a fraction of the resources and produces clean, reliable energy 24/7/365. NP really is the premier example of dematerialization in which we actually use less to produce more.
    And we certainly don't add intermittent power sources in order to harden our increasingly fragile energy infrastructure.

  • @ryanexx5250
    @ryanexx5250 3 роки тому +12

    Something about wind turbines is just majestic

    • @letsmakegadgets6899
      @letsmakegadgets6899 3 роки тому

      @George Mann And why would you care?

    • @inigobantok1579
      @inigobantok1579 3 роки тому +1

      @@letsmakegadgets6899 it's output power is laughable compare to the conventional energy sources and it takes a lot of space

    • @oneildennis5956
      @oneildennis5956 3 роки тому

      @@inigobantok1579 fossil fuel plant take alot of fuel.

  • @emmanuelsamuels2470
    @emmanuelsamuels2470 3 роки тому +74

    Yall be releasing like crazy.

    • @Pau_Pau9
      @Pau_Pau9 3 роки тому +2

      Felt good providing free energy!

    • @avocadogaming3942
      @avocadogaming3942 3 роки тому +3

      Putting all those unpaid interns to work

  • @henrypotter3024
    @henrypotter3024 3 роки тому +33

    Yes, the turbines are the only thing killing birds, buildings have no impact....

    • @noirto2
      @noirto2 3 роки тому +14

      generally any human activity will impact wildlife, no one can claim the massive farmland that clear massive amount of land isn't having an impact in bird population of the area.

    • @androz38
      @androz38 3 роки тому +12

      Exactly, or the billions of chickens we slaughter every year. All of a sudden birds lives matter

  • @Ayo22210
    @Ayo22210 3 роки тому +61

    Everyone should be pro cheap and clean energy

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 3 роки тому +5

      Wind power only works about 30% of the time. Huge waste of money. They have good lobbyists.

    • @briandavis849
      @briandavis849 3 роки тому

      they are. it’s natural gas for now, not wind. solar doesn’t work everywhere and doesn’t make enough power.

    • @Jaxboy86
      @Jaxboy86 3 роки тому +5

      Wind really isnt clean. Neither is solar for that matter.

    • @AeDreamerz
      @AeDreamerz 3 роки тому +9

      @@Jaxboy86 I would say "cleaner" much cleaner than others

    • @Jaxboy86
      @Jaxboy86 3 роки тому

      @@AeDreamerz both rely on fossil fuels still. And the waste from both is tremendous. Wind blades expire and can not be recycled. They have to be barried where they very very very very slowly decompose. None of it is "green".

  • @Tina-di4lx
    @Tina-di4lx 3 роки тому +21

    We just winterize wind turbines.
    They work real well.

  • @Dieselman6.7
    @Dieselman6.7 3 роки тому +1

    I’m a wind tech, I’ve been doing it for 7 years, we are so understaffed right now it’s not even funny. Our Business is thriving. Brand new guys are making 2k a week, AFTER TAXES. it’s a great paying industry and I love my job. I’m making 3-4k a week and I’m so thankful, I’m 25, my house is paid off, my 2 kids have their college paid for already just waiting for them to turn 18. I love my industry. And were not going anywhere 🙃

    • @TayTay-fn6cx
      @TayTay-fn6cx 3 роки тому

      Same! I'm 20 and work on the gearboxes, get paid well and i love my job :D

  • @AmerBoyo
    @AmerBoyo 3 роки тому +25

    It’s total insanity to oppose renewables, total insanity. Well put-together video:)

    • @Daniel-gs9eh
      @Daniel-gs9eh 3 роки тому +3

      i just like the idea of coal

    • @80sbaby98
      @80sbaby98 3 роки тому +1

      Funny because all these so called renweables require, coal plants and steel plants to build the actual turbine and maintain it

    • @AmerBoyo
      @AmerBoyo 3 роки тому +7

      @@80sbaby98 now that is the case yes but that can be swapped out for renewable hydrogen in a lot of cases, then it’ll be totally green!

    • @akyhne
      @akyhne 3 роки тому +5

      @@80sbaby98 Steel plants use electricity, dummy. Not coal.

    • @cakeisyummy5755
      @cakeisyummy5755 3 роки тому

      @@Daniel-gs9eh We will run out of Coal in 2050 and or 2100.

  • @ElemXCR
    @ElemXCR 3 роки тому +27

    I'm still a staunch supporter of nuclear energy. Should be much cheaper and if combined with wind and solar... can reduce the demand on just nuclear energy alone, thus reducing potential radioactive products required to store away.
    It's still a strong proponent to get to the zero emission goal. Since nuclear power is the strong power producing technology we have and zero carbon emissions. Modernized nuclear power plants should have severely reduced the number of potential accidents and disaster that is still around on old nuclear power plants that hasn't been shut down and/or decommissioned.

    • @James-ln6li
      @James-ln6li 3 роки тому +8

      I agree with you. Nuclear has come a long way with new technologies. It is a shame so many people are scared of it.

    • @blancavelasquez9859
      @blancavelasquez9859 3 роки тому

      @@James-ln6li tbh most people now have completely changed their mind on nuclear o remember i changed mine a few years ago when my chemistry teacher told us they’re completely safe and have zero emissions and most people now mention nuclear in some form when talking about combating climate change honestly i think the fukushima did some damage but it seems most people have the right idea now or so it seems

    • @anyanyanyanyanyany3551
      @anyanyanyanyanyany3551 3 роки тому

      @@blancavelasquez9859 ehh I don't know. Eco-fascists are spreading fear and propaganda about nuclear energy. The pushback of nuclear is much more prevalent in western countries rather than 3rd world countries.

    • @Crokatec
      @Crokatec 3 роки тому +1

      Nuclear power for electricity generation is dangerous and a waste of nuclear fuel. It should be banned

    • @James-ln6li
      @James-ln6li 3 роки тому

      @@Crokatec you dont even know what you are talking about. The technology has improved a lot. Go back to watch Fox News and doing nothing with your life. How about trying to put more thought into your response than "nUcLEar bAd" and do some research for yourself.

  • @nathanlewis42
    @nathanlewis42 3 роки тому +7

    This story is missing an important detail about offshore wind. Far from interfereing with fish it actually saves marine life from ocean floor trawlers so wind farms become marine life refuges.

  • @GarzaB
    @GarzaB 2 роки тому +2

    How can we not love how we have the capacity to better ourselves for future generations and our planet 🌎💚

  • @rare_wubbox360
    @rare_wubbox360 3 роки тому +10

    When looking at what harm windpower might cause, you should balance that out with effects of current power production.. e.g some part of health issues, deaths, killing of entire species, increasing storms, flooding , droughts and sea level rise..
    helps a lot to put things in perspective👍🇳🇴

    • @akyhne
      @akyhne 3 роки тому +2

      There's a study made in 2012 I think, that put this into perspective. Coal plants were many, many times deadlier per KWh. Some think like 12,000 to 2,00 per X kWh.

  • @enginerepairguy
    @enginerepairguy 3 роки тому +11

    The biggest ones we have in denmark is 10.8 MW
    Wind creates lots of jobs, coal miners and other that have been laid of due to coal. Should be really exsited.

  • @eaaeeeea
    @eaaeeeea 3 роки тому +5

    I feel like the positive traits of wind power far exceeds all the negative sides of them. And being concerned about birds only when an oil lobbyists raises such concern (directly or indirectly through media), is quite hypocritical.

  • @SurvivalSystemsUSA
    @SurvivalSystemsUSA 3 роки тому +6

    We are excited to watch the wind industry grow and happy to provide safety training for wind industry workers!

  • @dertythegrower
    @dertythegrower 3 роки тому +12

    Right on... thank you... Also the audio on this video seems low or muffled in a way when the girl is talking.

    • @pkal244
      @pkal244 3 роки тому

      Due to covid all these editors are working from home and recording from their phone vs an actual studio or simple mic setup.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 5 місяців тому +1

    Wind turbine generators are not a part of a power grid's dispatchable power. The grid capacity is from dispatchable power that the wind turbine generators can substitute for when able to make power. It is wild AC that has to be conditioned to be power grid quality.

  • @julianshepherd2038
    @julianshepherd2038 3 роки тому +14

    In Scotland Mr Trump built a golf course but not the other stuff he was supposed to.
    There is now a lovely windfarm just offshore from his place.

    • @mattt8889
      @mattt8889 3 роки тому

      poetic justice... also he loses (just like in everything else) tons of money on that course each year.

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 3 роки тому +3

    I mean, it took a *LONG* time for offshore wind turbines to finally get constructed off the coast of the northeastern USA. There was considerable opposition to the putting offshore wind turbine farms near Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Island, and only recently has the technology for building offshore wind farms has been viable to put it in the deeper waters between the east end of Long Island and Martha's Vineyard.

  • @dnguyen787
    @dnguyen787 3 роки тому +74

    Looks like fossil fuel days are numbered!

    • @makatron
      @makatron 3 роки тому +2

      Planes will still be using fossil fuels for very long.

    • @thefunshackwars5418
      @thefunshackwars5418 3 роки тому +11

      @Youtuve Youtuve arabs will use the money they got to invest in renewable energy now lol, they already started

    • @ericdavidson9974
      @ericdavidson9974 3 роки тому +2

      I’m sure fossil fuels still have several thousand days left.

    • @alfredoalcantar8691
      @alfredoalcantar8691 3 роки тому +1

      You know not everybody can afford energy cars right

    • @brooklyn560
      @brooklyn560 3 роки тому +4

      @@alfredoalcantar8691 give it about 5 years.

  • @Pssst.ByTheWay
    @Pssst.ByTheWay 3 роки тому +2

    i cant believe us politicians blamed renewables. looks out the window at windmills in europe. they work just fine

  • @scottmohrman
    @scottmohrman 3 роки тому +9

    The future of energy production looks cleaner, cheaper and awesome.

    • @TankDerek
      @TankDerek 3 роки тому +2

      @Calvin Parish Literally every power source available has been around in some form since the 50s or earlier. Cope or wait around for fusion to become a thing.

  • @erikaskerov4608
    @erikaskerov4608 3 роки тому +6

    They just look so cool, and clean energy is just more pleasant

    • @aarone1777
      @aarone1777 3 роки тому +1

      And: as it becomes more advanced will look less obtrusive And will produce more energy! If we can keep the greedy oil billanaires off the backs of wind/solar farmers someday our descendants will have a clean world to live in!

  • @ElDJReturn
    @ElDJReturn 3 роки тому +13

    12:18 Bless you for calling out the NIMBY's

  • @jabbalito3787
    @jabbalito3787 3 роки тому +22

    Good, let's switch to clean energy and provide clean energy and new jobs for americans

    • @ajax818
      @ajax818 3 роки тому +3

      @Calvin Parish They don’t care that it’s cleaner, they just want to keep making their money.

    • @JoglosemarFoodie
      @JoglosemarFoodie 3 роки тому

      New job for China who build turbine blade

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому +3

      Ya & we need new jobs in America instead of them going overseas like china, Vietnam, and other places because these jobs are here to stay it's not like the Chinese can take away our wind turbines

    • @jabbalito3787
      @jabbalito3787 3 роки тому +1

      @Calvin Parish drilling won’t go away though. Plastics, airplane fuel, and all sorts of petroleum products will still need to be made.

    • @Hjernespreng
      @Hjernespreng 3 роки тому +1

      @Calvin Parish Try to guess why the old battery corporations initially refused to invest in Lithium-ion batteries when they were first invented.
      Easy: because they defiantly want to protect their market share of the old product.
      Also, wind and solar ARE creating jobs, gebius. Look it up. More Americans are employed by the wind sector than coal.

  • @IMGreg..
    @IMGreg.. 3 роки тому +13

    114,000 jobs that's more than the coal industry.

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому +2

      I dont know what's the point of vouching for clean coal anymore!😂

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому +2

      Ya and people say that getting rid of coal and oil will get rid of jobs which is true but there will he way more jobs with nuclear, wind turbines, and solar panels

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому

      @@sanmarino8605 Turbines need to be inspected and have their brakes inspected every month or two, especially when they're planted in remote locations!

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому +1

      @@MainMite06 ya and you hire people to inspect them and build them= jobs

  • @garogaryvoskorian2619
    @garogaryvoskorian2619 3 роки тому +6

    prices should be decreased exponentially for renewable energy while increasing for coal, oil and gas energy sources

    • @alanmay7929
      @alanmay7929 3 роки тому

      Unfortunately coal, gas and oil offers cooking, heating.... which renewable often struggle to do.

    • @OM-el6oy
      @OM-el6oy 3 роки тому

      @@alanmay7929 cooking oil is not the same as crude oil. Electric stoves exist and are actually superior to gas stoves. Electric heating is more expensive but eventually, it'll be how all homes are heated.

    • @chuckley54494
      @chuckley54494 3 роки тому

      Honestly nuclear still has it beat over life of plant vs life of windfarm

    • @alanmay7929
      @alanmay7929 3 роки тому

      @@OM-el6oy dont make a confusion, most people still use gas for heating and cooking and thats all around the world, not just the US.

    • @alfredoalcantar8691
      @alfredoalcantar8691 3 роки тому

      @@OM-el6oy actually cooking with electric stove does not give the quality of the food and rest is the temperature to the right that you like

  • @안재헌-b6s
    @안재헌-b6s 3 роки тому +43

    3..2..1.. Cue the republicans suddenly caring about birds..

    • @stevechance150
      @stevechance150 3 роки тому

      What kills 10 times more birds than windmills? The pet cats that live outside our houses. If Republicans care about birds, let's hear Republicans propose legislation to get rid of outside pet cats. Ha!

    • @mans4104
      @mans4104 3 роки тому +1

      Cue the liberals suddenly don't caring about birds

    • @JW4REnvironment
      @JW4REnvironment 3 роки тому

      Well said! Kind of ironic

  • @adityaajit2120
    @adityaajit2120 3 роки тому +25

    Last time I was this early there weren't any environmentalists in apple and chargers still came in the box

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому +2

      It's not about the invorment it's about them saving money because if you buy a charger separately it's in a box still apple kinda sucks

    • @adityaajit2120
      @adityaajit2120 3 роки тому +3

      @@sanmarino8605 why don't you understand sarcasm

    • @sanmarino8605
      @sanmarino8605 3 роки тому

      @@adityaajit2120 because I'm pretty dumb

    • @adityaajit2120
      @adityaajit2120 3 роки тому +2

      @@sanmarino8605 nah you aren't but just need to play with more words and you're good to go

  • @MrDisasterboy
    @MrDisasterboy 3 роки тому +6

    On the grid where I live in Australia, we have coal and solar and wind and gas. The Capacity Factor of coal is about 60% and the cApacity factor of wind is about 50%. Because the wind so cheap and reliable the coal power stations are closing down. Probably all gone in a few years or so.
    As the wind turbines get bigger. so does their Capacity Factor, especially if they are well engineered and large enough to run in geostrophic winds above the atmospheric boundary layer.

  • @stanleytolle416
    @stanleytolle416 3 роки тому +4

    Having high temperature generation IV nuclear with heat storage would make wind power more comparable with the needs of the electric grid. Plants like these could produce back up and peak power when wind is have trouble producing power.

  • @dlewis8405
    @dlewis8405 3 роки тому +6

    I am so glad we are past the point of having to push for renewables in the political space. It is clear that the fossil fuel industry will be driven out of business simply on cost.

  • @NuclearCarnivore
    @NuclearCarnivore Рік тому +1

    Please regulate renewables as strictly as you regulate nuclear (which is actually renewable too.) especially the toxic waste produced by trashed wind turbines and solar panels

    • @50jakecs
      @50jakecs Рік тому +1

      Nuclear isn't renewable. It just doesn't produce CO2.

  • @CornelleJ
    @CornelleJ 3 роки тому +8

    Wouldn't painting one black, increase heat on that blade affecting its temp and performance?

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому +4

      *But you have to factor the blade material's tensile strength and tolerance to high heat*
      Aerial Turbine engines( Turbojet,Turbofan, Turboprop, and Turboshaft) use internal blades that are made from titanium
      because
      no other metal can handle the stress, heat, and fatigue the innards of a turbine could subject to their innards

  • @bjarnecola6384
    @bjarnecola6384 3 роки тому +2

    Wow. CNBC telling the truth.

  • @t3t611
    @t3t611 3 роки тому +22

    it's like the speaking republican tried to spit on the wind tubines--
    it was just a little bit too late for him to realize which way the wind was blowing.

    • @recruit8921
      @recruit8921 3 роки тому +4

      @Calvin Parish same with other energy sources

  • @Surga_myth_dewa_real
    @Surga_myth_dewa_real 8 місяців тому +1

    Wind turbine generator is amazing thinks,,its turn a giant storm even hurricane into super clean and fresh energy directly electric❤❤,

    • @Surga_myth_dewa_real
      @Surga_myth_dewa_real 8 місяців тому

      Rather end video you must compare with existing power plant right now such as coal,nuclear etc,they killed thousand human bot just bird,even jobs,environment etc,thanks

  • @christianthomsen6701
    @christianthomsen6701 3 роки тому +7

    We need nucear to combine

  • @unforgettablesketches2695
    @unforgettablesketches2695 3 роки тому

    I work as energy analyst for a energy company in Texas. The problem is not depending one sources of energy but a hybrid. Solar to match oil, wind to match natural gas or coal to match nuclear. The answer is simply you need a back up to back up, to the back up. Wind doesn’t allows blow and solar sun doesn’t always shine and natural gas or coal is not always the answer.

  • @AwesomeDwarves
    @AwesomeDwarves 3 роки тому +10

    Also keep in mind that fossil fuels are subsidized more than renewables on average.

    • @fitzy1093
      @fitzy1093 3 роки тому +2

      Uh what? Please cite your source?
      Please identify any fossil fuel subsidy that is better than 30% ITC on ~95% of hard costs, 5-yr MACRS depreciation also on ~95% of hard costs, and special partnership accounting laws that enable the existence of a tax equity market whereby an investor can give you capital in exchange for efficiently monetizing the resulting massive NOLs / tax benefits? ... something tells me you have no idea what you're talking about...

    • @crinolynneendymion8755
      @crinolynneendymion8755 2 роки тому

      @@fitzy1093 Something tells me you never learned how to write a grammatical sentence? Something tells me that you don't know what you actual said far less what your talkign about.

  • @spoileralert3754
    @spoileralert3754 3 роки тому +1

    The answer to bird deaths are Vertical Wind Turbines (VWT). These wind electricity generators do not change shape and as such are treated by birds as another obstacle to fly around. Also, they generate power regardless of the winds direction. As the grab blades are 360 degrees around the VWT.

    • @akyhne
      @akyhne 3 роки тому +1

      Uhmm... regular wind turbines automatically turn into the wind.
      And VWT isn't an effective way of generating electricity. There's a reason why they never took off.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 3 роки тому +13

    wind turbines in areas with frequent tornadoes generate more electricity

    • @fgsaramago
      @fgsaramago 3 роки тому +2

      No

    • @hameedullahkhan4441
      @hameedullahkhan4441 3 роки тому +1

      And break more often...

    • @ElemXCR
      @ElemXCR 3 роки тому +4

      And more "ammo" for the tornadoes to deal more damage.

    • @auro1986
      @auro1986 3 роки тому +2

      @@hameedullahkhan4441 then your business should be selling wind turbines

  • @carlroberts1172
    @carlroberts1172 3 роки тому +2

    What is the payback period for these wind turbines? How long are they expected to last? What type of maintenance do they require?

  • @bkbland1626
    @bkbland1626 3 роки тому +6

    The fact is that the renewables actually outperformed the other types.

    • @jacob_massengale
      @jacob_massengale 3 роки тому +1

      the problem is that its hard to break into an already filled market. in capitalism, its all fun and competition until there is none. every little guy has a chance at the beginning, then almost all of them get pushed out or to the edge of extinction. In our system, we don't share ideas to better humanity, but for patents to boost our own profits.

  • @yutakago1736
    @yutakago1736 3 роки тому +2

    Most of the energy comes from oil not from wind. Why blame the power outage on wind ?

  • @3rkid
    @3rkid 3 роки тому +9

    This stuff is so exciting. I'm making a significant part of my retirement account investing in the renewable sector ($FAN, $TAN) because of how much I believe in it.

    • @scottmohrman
      @scottmohrman 3 роки тому +1

      Invest in the future you want to see. The best kind of investing.

    • @autodidact537
      @autodidact537 3 роки тому

      In that case I happen to have a bridge you might be interested in buying..........

  • @Marchant2
    @Marchant2 3 роки тому

    Now I’ve got that Thomas Dolby song stuck in my head.
    Windpower.

  • @emmanuelsamuels2470
    @emmanuelsamuels2470 3 роки тому +22

    Texans go "Brrrrr"

    • @lenholt7419
      @lenholt7419 3 роки тому +3

      Priceless...

    • @That-Guy_
      @That-Guy_ 3 роки тому +6

      Not me
      My Tesla solar panels and powerwalls got me through the 44hr Houston blackout
      ☀️⚡🏡

    • @Gogalen789
      @Gogalen789 3 роки тому +1

      Minnesotans go: Aaahhh. What a beautiful sunny day at 12 degrees F.

    • @noldo3837
      @noldo3837 3 роки тому

      Making Texans mad is one of the best sideproducts.

  • @ricnyc2759
    @ricnyc2759 3 роки тому +12

    Conservatives in Texas: "Those wind turbines will work as propellers and push Earth out of its orbit around the Sun".

    • @lenholt7419
      @lenholt7419 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah that needs some work. If we get an equal number of Turbines on the opposite side of the globe and we had them pointed at each other...I can't see te problem.

    • @christopherflack7629
      @christopherflack7629 3 роки тому +1

      THA EARTH IZ FLAT N DA SON ORBITZ THE EARTH. DID'T U READ BIBBLE

  • @UnipornFrumm
    @UnipornFrumm 3 роки тому +2

    Bro,seeing offshore wind turbines from your window is cool

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому

      Problem: *Beach Nimbys hate seeing anything 'artificial' in their skyline!*
      "Bahumbug! I hate those giant windmills in my sight!"

  • @davidrink1291
    @davidrink1291 3 роки тому

    One big thing overlooked in this article are the large battery storage facilities that have been built in Australia, California and now Texas.

  • @Azivegu
    @Azivegu 3 роки тому +3

    I am not sure of actual research, just hearsay. But some Dutch fishers have reported, that while their yield declined after the installation of an off-shore wind farm, it actually increased to pre-wind farm levels because the artificial reef provided a safe zone, that became so diverse, it pushes species out of it. So it might be the case that it helps provide a sustainable baseline. Almost like creating a marine habitat preserve.

  • @ICONICPARIS
    @ICONICPARIS 3 роки тому

    Those things are HUGE

  • @alimfuzzy
    @alimfuzzy 3 роки тому +13

    It's strange that it's 2021 and most of our power still comes from turning a crank.

    • @Hello-uk5xp
      @Hello-uk5xp 3 роки тому +4

      Where should we get our power then 😀

    • @diskyariajetmiko
      @diskyariajetmiko 3 роки тому +1

      Lol that's basic physics bruh, no other method exist. Even nuclear power came from "turning a crank"

    • @grantgeorgia7168
      @grantgeorgia7168 3 роки тому

      @Nathan Gautrey Here's a concept for a hydrogen-boron fusion reactor that doesn't use a steam-driven turbine: newatlas.com/energy/hb11-hydrogen-boron-fusion-clean-energy/
      "a largely empty metal sphere, where a modestly sized HB11 fuel pellet is held in the center, with apertures on different sides for the two lasers. One laser establishes the magnetic containment field for the plasma and the second laser triggers the ‘avalanche’ fusion chain reaction. The alpha particles generated by the reaction would create an electrical flow that can be channeled almost directly into an existing power grid with no need for a heat exchanger or steam turbine generator."

    • @mumi009
      @mumi009 3 роки тому

      All fossil fuel and nuke power plants operate on the same principle. Heat water and use it to turn a turbine. Nukes are just very big, complicated and radioactive water heaters. No quantum leap of technology for generating electricity.

    • @cakeisyummy5755
      @cakeisyummy5755 3 роки тому

      @@Hello-uk5xpNuclear/Renewables.

  • @GoldAceNews
    @GoldAceNews 3 роки тому +2

    Start investing in Clean energy, utilities... real cheap now folks. Forecast by Goldman Sachs and other pros, it will increase it's revenue by 40% in 2030.

    • @shoppinmadnesz22
      @shoppinmadnesz22 3 роки тому

      interesting. like which companies would be best to invest in? Atlantic Shores? Mayflower Wind? BP & Equinor?

  • @zeighy
    @zeighy 3 роки тому +6

    Republicans: we don't want renewables
    Texas: Okay, we won't build a lot of them... We'll build more oil and gas plants
    Republicans: we blame renewables for the power failure!!
    Texas: but we barely have renewables for power....... We didn't build a lot of those..... The oil and gas plants failed!!
    Republicans: NEW GREEN DEAL IS BAD!!!11!!

    • @zeighy
      @zeighy 3 роки тому +3

      @Calvin Parish That's the point. the petro plants died, but they don't wanna say it. They keep saying it's all the renewables fault. Looks like media is keep you less informed. A good mix of supply would be great. The deployment of renewables in Texas was half assed because of the fact that they didn't want them. If they did deploy them properly... Oh, I don't know... It wouldn't have failed... Oh right... the petrol plants were half assed, too... Not geared for extreme weather that happened in 2011.... I mean, I guess climate change ain't happening, huh?

    • @lylestavast7652
      @lylestavast7652 3 роки тому

      Texas creates more electricity from wind than any other state, by a HUGE distance...

  • @eclipsenow5431
    @eclipsenow5431 2 роки тому

    Overseas gigantic WOOD turbines are now being used - broken down in a flatpack mode for easier transport. Now THAT is an interesting Ikea flatpack assembly challenge!

  • @KJSvitko
    @KJSvitko 3 роки тому +5

    Solar energy combined with battery storage keeps the lights on when the utilities go down.

    • @MainMite06
      @MainMite06 3 роки тому +2

      Any electricity is helpful electricity when used properly!

    • @KJSvitko
      @KJSvitko 3 роки тому +2

      @@MainMite06 Free electricity from the sun is helpful to your bank account.

  • @danielhorne6042
    @danielhorne6042 3 роки тому +1

    i would rather see turbines out my window than none

  • @richardjones6816
    @richardjones6816 3 роки тому +9

    Very interesting and informative. Let's hope our government gets behind renewables.

    • @fitzy1093
      @fitzy1093 3 роки тому

      The US gov't is very much "behind" renewables. The federal subsidies (Investment Tax Credit, Production Tax Credit, and others) have been around for over 10 years and are highly lucrative

  • @DCTag
    @DCTag 3 роки тому +2

    Nuclear energy is still the way to go.

  • @elvino8948
    @elvino8948 3 роки тому +5

    5:16 U.S. A world leader behind China and Europe being 3th isnt a leader!?

    • @watch50er
      @watch50er 3 роки тому +1

      Key word “a” not “the” out of all other nations of the world, but the word “leader” in this context has history against it with the bull headed ego of US image projections

  • @basicinvesting1019
    @basicinvesting1019 3 роки тому +2

    Except when it fails in Texas

    • @alfredoalcantar8691
      @alfredoalcantar8691 3 роки тому

      Yes because windmills don't work. In the hot summer days the windmills are turned off

    • @brooklyn560
      @brooklyn560 3 роки тому +7

      All forms of power generation failed not just renewable 🤦🏾‍♂️. Texas has its mass outage for 2reasons
      1 their state is the only state that isn’t connected to the 2 national grids. So they can’t bring in outside power.
      2. They don’t harden their power facilities against cold weather

  • @RelaxingMusic-zq8ut
    @RelaxingMusic-zq8ut 3 роки тому +3

    I swear i saw this video earlier

  • @raylopez99
    @raylopez99 3 роки тому +1

    My dad used to tout wind energy....over 50 years ago. Pioneer! But we need better storage systems...a better battery to store peak power is needed, perhaps at the end user's place. Note regulatory issues limiting turbines, lol, only in litigious America.

    • @uptorest
      @uptorest 3 роки тому +1

      There are already companies prototyping battery tech just for storing the electricity captured from wind and solar

  • @uprightape100
    @uprightape100 3 роки тому +13

    Texas Fact: Greg Abbotts' brain doesn't work any better than his legs.

  • @juanasenjo8515
    @juanasenjo8515 3 роки тому +1

    "The largest driver of warming is the emission of greenhouse gases, of which more than 90% are carbon dioxide (CO
    2) and methane. Fossil fuel burning (coal, oil, and natural gas) for energy consumption is the main source of these emissions, with additional contributions from agriculture, deforestation, and manufacturing. The human cause of climate change is not disputed by any scientific body of national or international standing." ---- Wikipedia. Either we source ALL our energy from renewables, or we will die a slow death, no doubt.

  • @robabiera733
    @robabiera733 3 роки тому +4

    It's rich to hear wind supporters complaining about government regulations on the one hand, while praising government intervention on the other.

    • @deathgun3110
      @deathgun3110 3 роки тому

      It´s because climate change is a thing and we have to limit the use of fossil fuels fast because we had wasted over 40 years deabting about scientific consens.

  • @renewableinvesments6826
    @renewableinvesments6826 3 роки тому

    Never would have guessed Texas was the largest producer of wind energy.

  • @N9mber
    @N9mber 3 роки тому +3

    Wind turbines are only effective in certain locations in the U.S like Texas and other plains states. They can provide clean sources of energy but need enormous amounts of non-green material to construct. Bird populations are also affected via wind plants and noise pollution is also a negative externality of wind power. The amount of land needed to be used to generate wind compared to solar, nuclear, coal, and natural gas is far larger per sq/km.
    Void of sunlight or other natural resources, wind power would be more efficient. Other than that it can be costly and inefficient compared to other power plants. The video does bring up good facts about the lifetime of windpower but ignores the maintenance cost and land use for wind power, which results in more cost for the amount of land used.

    • @fgsaramago
      @fgsaramago 3 роки тому

      Lol, no. Windmills are often built on elevations, not plains. Also, the noise is pretty negligible

    • @N9mber
      @N9mber 3 роки тому +1

      @@fgsaramago Plain states, where wind potential energy is the highest. That doesn’t mean the windmills are built on an actual plain. The term refers to a geographical location of the U.S. Looking at a map of the U.S, the highest concentration for wind power feasibility are located in areas between the Rockies and the Mississippi river (plains states region).

    • @fgsaramago
      @fgsaramago 3 роки тому

      @@N9mber no, you dont want much wind. Windmills have to be stopped if theres much wind. Also, the reason why plains states are called such is because there are plains in them...

    • @slaphead3791
      @slaphead3791 3 роки тому

      1. It is not suggested that Wind should be the main source of energy, only a part.
      2. I have heard wind turbines (big ones) and they are not noisy at all, unless you live very close to one
      3. Bird population, really? The amount of different species getting affected by black energy is 10-100x greater than what wind will ever do.
      4. We have plenty of land
      5. The benefits far outweigh the negatives, just look at air pollution alone
      6. Even if you factor in the maintenance cost, you will still get a nice return on your investment, and you do not account for future improvements.

  • @mattweiss7645
    @mattweiss7645 3 роки тому

    Anyone saying, as an excuse for keeping carbon fuels, that China isn't also trying to create renewables is just ignorant at this point. The amount of solar and wind capacity they are creating is on par with the US when scaled.

  • @SaceedAbul
    @SaceedAbul 3 роки тому +5

    Just don’t get Texans to engineer it. They’ll mess up

    • @AlanHernandez-jn2mp
      @AlanHernandez-jn2mp 3 роки тому +1

      Sorry but Texas is leading In renewables ... Lots of smart people, 30+ million to choose from

    • @chloedegurechaff1941
      @chloedegurechaff1941 3 роки тому +1

      Sorry but texas has of the best engineering schools, is the largest construction market, and has lots of great electrical engineers, i mean. Texas is the pioneer of the semiconductor, and still is a big player in electronics.

  • @lunasmokezim1718
    @lunasmokezim1718 3 роки тому +2

    Love stories like this! Very encouraging :-)

  • @bettyscruggs1961
    @bettyscruggs1961 3 роки тому +3

    Even with the availability of different trading options in the market like CRYPTO, STOCK,FOREX etc. It can still be very possible for one to make loss unless they do have the proper skill to do so.

    • @Davincij-ve2zg
      @Davincij-ve2zg 3 роки тому

      Absolutely right, few years back I recorded series of losses, it's a good thing that I can now make a tangible profits in the market with a sensible investing routine even when it seem difficult and nearly impossible.

    • @henry3028
      @henry3028 3 роки тому

      Well, Stocks are more long term for me on the other hand crypto and bitcoins is having a rush hour.

  • @MrBemnet1
    @MrBemnet1 3 роки тому

    We need to look more in to thermal energy storage

  • @jarrodyuki7081
    @jarrodyuki7081 3 роки тому +3

    just adjust the infrastructure to adapt to cold.

  • @robertkat
    @robertkat 3 роки тому

    Recently in Newmexico contractors destroyed 69 newer working windmills no reason was given. They said it's someone else's job to take them to the dump.

  • @abrahamghannam2137
    @abrahamghannam2137 3 роки тому +2

    One nuclear power plant makes 14,000 MW in a 24 hour day one wind generator makes About 4 MW do you know how many wind and solar panels we would need

    • @ThomasBomb45
      @ThomasBomb45 3 роки тому +2

      A gigawatt is not something you create in a day... that's like saying your car can travel 3000mph in a day

    • @ThomasBomb45
      @ThomasBomb45 3 роки тому +1

      Anyway, nuclear projects take too long to approve and build. A decade or more. Would be good in the 90s but at this point we can't just sit around and wait for nuclear plants to be built. We need other energy sources in the meantime

    • @abrahamghannam2137
      @abrahamghannam2137 3 роки тому

      OK Nikola Tesla but are you gonna tell me that we are going to be able to turn on everybody’s air conditioner charge all our phones or TVs or laptops are cars and everything else that runs on electricity that does not equal megawatts or gigawatts matters in terawatts if everybody gets off work at five and six when the stupid pandemic is over if it ever is over and everything does go to electric including our cars do you actually think we are going to be able to power up everything and renewables such as solar and wind California can’t do it now And they only have 2% electric vehicles right now

    • @abrahamghannam2137
      @abrahamghannam2137 3 роки тому

      @@ThomasBomb45 I meant to say megawatts

    • @ThomasBomb45
      @ThomasBomb45 3 роки тому

      @@abrahamghannam2137 do you mean megawatt-hour? Watts are a measure of power, and one Watt is one Joule per second. Watts are like mph, and watt-hours are like miles

  • @italoddd
    @italoddd 3 роки тому

    I live in texas and I have solar panels, it DIDN'T WORK on the winter storm. They closed the network, and I lost 1 week of production. Also, no eletricity for one week