Factorial Fact Frenzy (!)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2022
  • Let me show you why "factorials" are so important and share a bunch of fun(damental) fact(orial)s, such as: factorials hiding in clocks/calendars, why 0 factorial = 1, mutant variations like "hyperfactorials", and more !! As usual in the Combo Classroom, things gets a bit crazy by the end ! Thanks for watching ! Leave a comment ending with an exclamation point so it'll be ambiguous if you're yelling or writing a factorial symbol !
    To everybody who asked if I have a Patreon: I'll be starting one December 1, so stay tuned for that if you want to support the channel and get behind-the-scenes videos and other rewards ! Thanks !
    Disclaimer: Do not copy any actions you see in this video, apart from the mathematical knowledge. This is for educational purposes.
    Combo Class links:
    Bonus Channel with more videos: / @domotro
    Discord: / discord
    Reddit: / comboclass
    Patreon: (coming in December)
    Some topics in this video include: factorials, permutations, music, chairs, decks of cards, clocks, calendars, 0 factorial, primorials, alternating factorials, hyperfactorials, exponential factorials, double factorials, multifactorials, prime numbers, the gamma function, Stirling's approximation formula, candles, and more... !
    Combo Class, taught by Domotro, is an unconventional learning experience where anybody (whether they're a fan of normal school or not) can become excited to learn rare things about math, science, language, and more. Also check out the shorter videos on the Combo Class Bonus channel. Thanks for coming to Combo Class !

КОМЕНТАРІ • 225

  • @ComboClass
    @ComboClass  Рік тому +21

    Ok here's the Patreon that people requested, which I just launched (with various cool rewards for different tiers) www.patreon.com/comboclass

  • @HipsterShiningArmor
    @HipsterShiningArmor Рік тому +291

    fun fact: factorials don't actually exist, your math teacher was just very excited about the number 6

  • @alexpotts6520
    @alexpotts6520 Рік тому +58

    Deserves a like just for "welcome to the factorial factory for a factorial fact tutorial"

  • @peppermann
    @peppermann Рік тому +111

    Your channel is highly addictive, great maths facts and problems spinning from easy to mind-bending. You clearly know a lot of maths but your modest and chaotic back yard approach is refreshingly enjoyable. One of the best maths channels I’ve seen. Keep the videos coming! 👍❤️😎

  • @trudyandgeorge
    @trudyandgeorge Рік тому +39

    I love this guy so much.
    I missed out on maths having quit school in year 9 (because reasons). When I turned 30 I wanted to try and learn something before I was dead and enrolled in a "get-your-dumbarse-into-uni"-course for adults. A year later I got into computer science.
    After so. many. late nights after work doing the very basics of algebra, then trig, then calculus (god bless Khan Academy), I kept my head above water enough to graduate.
    Halfway through I realised that maths is not a calculation thing like I always thought, it's a creative thing! A deeply imaginative thing and it's chock full of fascination.
    This guy embodies that realisation so perfectly. "And look! There's pi and e lurking in there!! *wide-eyed stare*
    I wish I had a teacher like him when I was a boy.

    • @ker0356
      @ker0356 6 місяців тому +3

      damn man, a lot of people learn this stuff just because they were told to, but you have made a conscious decision and followed it through which I think is way harder. That's impressive, you should be proud of yourself

    • @trudyandgeorge
      @trudyandgeorge 6 місяців тому

      @@ker0356 Hey thanks man. To be honest, my missus deserves a medal because she picked up my slack due to lost time. Stuff like cooking, shopping, and forcing exercise breaks. God daaaaamn it's important who you marry, and I got mad-lucky 🍀. We have a kid now and "her time" is still yet to come, and I fear it never will, revealing an unfortunate statistic for many women. I am now sloggin' it out, trying to earn a motza in an attempt to provide some freedom for her, but so far it hasn't paid off 😄🔫. The work/husband/father balance is bloody tricky.

  • @ComboClass
    @ComboClass  Рік тому +82

    Thanks for watching ! Leave a comment that’s ambiguous whether you’re yelling or using factorial symbols ! Also, to everyone who asked if I have a Patreon: I’ll be launching one at the start of December, with cool behind-the-scenes videos and other rewards, which I’ll link in next week’s “snack break” episode here ! Also check out my Bonus Channel for more videos: www.youtube.com/@Domotro

    • @smartsmellafartfella1922
      @smartsmellafartfella1922 Рік тому +10

      How many eyes do most people have? 2!

    • @Pr1sk1
      @Pr1sk1 Рік тому +1

      I really love ur videos but I cannot understand why these arent more popular, but I have suspicion why, thing is u keep telling same thing over and over again as if viewers were 8 years old. I want u to be more popular but I think u should "tighten up" a bit, so many videos u essentially saying same thing over and over again as if people have difficulty understand what u are saying. This is just my personal opinion and I think u deserve to be more popular than u are. (youtube algorithm is bitch) mr beast is best source of how to make videos "viral". There is science behind it :) btw keep the stupid comedy, its great :D

    • @0homes
      @0homes Рік тому

      In the letter video, you said you would remove c, but what about the ch noise?

    • @cashtaylor9804
      @cashtaylor9804 Рік тому +2

      @@Pr1sk1Your talking about him repeating himself?? Have you even read your own comment🙄 Seriously, I bet he's thankful for your help telling him what he's doing wrong with his channel. Especially coming from someone with such a huge, and successful Utube channel like the one you have...... RIGHT??🙄🙄🙄

    • @cheekibreeki904
      @cheekibreeki904 Рік тому +1

      The simplest way to distinguish a mathematician from a programmer is to ask them the meaning of!

  • @JarmezGD
    @JarmezGD Рік тому +45

    The absolute insanity and chaotic nature of these videos just gets me hooked every time, along with the interesting random number facts! Awesome work, keep it up!

  • @kitten6317
    @kitten6317 Рік тому +31

    Double factorial is actually part of an infinite family of factorials, as things like a triple, Quaduple, and Pentuple factorials also exist, each giving even smaller results than the last

    • @ComboClass
      @ComboClass  Рік тому +25

      Yeah that family is the "multifactorials" I mentioned :)

    • @kitten6317
      @kitten6317 Рік тому +6

      Didn't see you mention that
      Also curious to see if something like a "Double Primorial" can exist

  • @Eoraph
    @Eoraph Рік тому +5

    My coworker once reminded us that we needed some parts: "we need 170!"

  • @dustindoesstuff374
    @dustindoesstuff374 Рік тому +30

    You’re killing it, bro 👍🏼

  • @dovesr0478
    @dovesr0478 Рік тому +9

    Bro are you a real teacher? You're one of the most passionate educators I've ever seen, definitely the kind of person a kid would remember for the rest of their life.

  • @sophie________
    @sophie________ Рік тому +13

    I was so confused on why 0! is 1, but you explained it really well. you're a great teacher

    • @faming1144
      @faming1144 Рік тому +4

      Another, more rigorous idea, is to write factorial in terms of its successor: n! = (n+1)!/(n+1). Plug in 0 and you get 1.

    • @MuffinsAPlenty
      @MuffinsAPlenty Рік тому +4

      @@faming1144 It's another way to motivate 0! = 1, but I wouldn't consider it "more rigorous". You either define factorials so that 0! = 1 is true by definition from the beginning, or you motivate it by showing it has a property we want and then define 0! = 1 separately. For example, you can prove n! = (n+1)!/(n+1) for all _positive_ integers n. But 0 isn't positive, so plugging in 0 isn't more rigorous. It's just another case of "0! = 1 is what we need in order for this pattern to hold", just like the "permutations of nothing" example.

    • @cheekibreeki904
      @cheekibreeki904 Рік тому

      @@MuffinsAPlenty we can rearrange the formula into "n!=(n-1)!*n" and plug in 1. Would that be more satisfying to you?

    • @MuffinsAPlenty
      @MuffinsAPlenty Рік тому

      @@cheekibreeki904 It's not a matter of being satisfying; it's a matter of rigor. I find using formulas like n! = n*(n-1)! or (n+1)!/(n+1) = n! to be quite satisfying ways to _motivate_ 0! = 1. And they are absolutely lovely things to mention to people! I think it does a disservice not to mention something like this. But unless 0! is already defined, you can't _prove_ that any formula will hold when plugging in something to get 0! = 1. Doing so only shows that _if you want 0! to have a value which makes this pattern continue,_ then 0! must be 1.
      You could define factorial in such a way that 0! = 1 pops out immediately.
      For example, some people define factorial recursively as 0! = 1 and then (n+1)! = (n+1)*n! for all nonnegative integers n. Here, 0! = 1 is automatic.
      My personal favorite way is to define n! is that, for nonnegative integers n, n! is the product of all positive integers less than or equal to n. Here, 0! = 1 can be proven provided that one accepts the empty product convention. In this case, 0! is the product of all positive integers less than or equal to 0. Since there are no positive integers less than or equal to 0, 0! is the empty product, which has a value of 1.
      There are other things one could do like defining factorial in terms of the gamma function, which also implies 0! = 1.
      Or you can _define_ n! as the number of permutations of a set of cardinality n. From this definition, 0! = 1 is provable.
      But if your definition of factorial doesn't imply 0! = 1, then plugging into a formula or continuing a pattern isn't a rigorous proof of 0! = 1. It's just a motivation for defining 0! = 1 separately from your already specified definition.

    • @faming1144
      @faming1144 Рік тому

      @@MuffinsAPlenty Maybe rigorous is not the best choice of words, although I called it an idea not a proof.
      But factorial as n! = n*(n-1)*(n-2)*...*1 and seen as the number of ways you can arrange n items, both only apply to positive integers. 0! as an extension does not fit above formula, and hence calling it 1 way to arrange zero items seems a bit filosophical to me. The derived formula n! = (n+1)!/(n+1) gives a more mathematical way to define 0! as 1.
      Moreover 0! is just one instance of an extension of factorial to all real numbers. Such an extension has been defined by the "Pi" function: integral[0->inf]e^-t•t^ndt, which indeed has Pi(0) = 1. And n! = (n+1)!/(n+1) not only holds for positive integers but is consistent with Pi for all real numbers.
      E.g. (1/2)! = Pi(1/2) = √π/2. So (-1/2)! = (1/2)!/(1/2) = √π. And indeed Pi(-1/2) = √π. (And no filosophising about arranging -1/2 items in √π ways.)
      Also note that in this extension Pi of negative integers is not defined. (n+1)!/(n+1) is still consistent as (-1)! = 0!/0 which is also not defined and hence all smaller negative integers are not defined by it.

  • @reecec626
    @reecec626 Рік тому +3

    Is anyone else loving the length time of this video? The sum of two cubes, twice!

    • @smbs47
      @smbs47 11 місяців тому +1

      Please explain

    • @bilkishchowdhury8318
      @bilkishchowdhury8318 3 дні тому

      ​@@smbs471729 famous Ramanujan taxicab number, is the smallest number that can be expressed as sum of two cubes in two different ways

  • @sophie________
    @sophie________ Рік тому +2

    I've never seen so many clocks in a person's back yard but I love it

  • @ww4830
    @ww4830 Рік тому +23

    Your videos continue to blow me away! Absolutely love the content

  • @Nikola_M
    @Nikola_M Рік тому +2

    This is like Breaking Bad but they cook math instead.

  • @Momotaroization
    @Momotaroization Рік тому

    That's one way to keep students attentive : at any moment, either I will learn something mind-blowing or chaos will explode on screen.

  • @cheeseburgermonkey7104
    @cheeseburgermonkey7104 Рік тому +13

    you honestly deserve more subs than 17.4k with this type of content in my opinion, 2 things i love are math and (occasionally) watching things collapse and crash and stuff, so mixing those together makes the perfect video for me. keep up the good work
    Can't wait for comment bots to attack your comment sections though because that's definitely good and wont cause any harm whatsoever /j

  • @galaga16
    @galaga16 Рік тому +3

    2:00
    The clock on the far right is 4:24
    4! = 24 clever

  • @hkayakh
    @hkayakh Рік тому +2

    So there’s this kid in my math class that always sleeps
    One day the teacher decides to call him out by asking him “Hey! What’s 5!”
    Pretty simple.
    The guy woke up and said “uhh 120”
    And then fell back asleep

  • @dyhnen8977
    @dyhnen8977 Рік тому +7

    He is like the Explosion & Fire dude but with math

  • @expensivefreeadvice8530
    @expensivefreeadvice8530 Рік тому +9

    These episodes are obviously planned, but don't think they're scripted. Such great awareness of presence of presentation. Just enough repetition to reinforce the concept without boring the viewer. Just enough silliness to entertain, but honestly accurate about communicating the topic concept. Best wishes and appreciate what you're doing.
    By the way, if 0! = 1, and 1! = 1, does that mean 0! = 1! ?

    • @ComboClass
      @ComboClass  Рік тому +5

      Thanks and yes 0!=1!

    • @andrebenites9919
      @andrebenites9919 Рік тому +2

      Is also works if you are using ? As the termial function (like factorial, but instead of multiplying, you add. Example: 3?=1+2+3=6. Fun fact, 3? = 3!)
      So, 0! =1! ? Because 0! = 1 and (1!) ? =1? = 1

    • @blableu4519
      @blableu4519 Рік тому

      ​​@andrebenites9919 isn't the ? operator you mention simply triangular numbers (n? = T_n = n(n+1)/2)?

  • @BatzelChaos
    @BatzelChaos Рік тому

    a pyromaniac obsessed with clocks teaching weird math on his backyard? never knew anything better.

  • @JoeBorrello
    @JoeBorrello 11 місяців тому +1

    Old geezers like me will remember the old Texas Instruments calculators from the 70s would do factorials, and since the biggest number it could display was 10^100-1, the biggest factorial it could do was 69. And it took several seconds to calculate that, which was a novelty, so it was fun to do 69!

  • @MrKockabilly
    @MrKockabilly Рік тому

    I think the most practical use of knowing factorials is about the lotteries, knowing what the chance of our bet's winning to know if it's worth it.

  • @Inspirator_AG112
    @Inspirator_AG112 Рік тому +3

    These are the official names of the following factorial variants.
    Subfactorial:
    The number of arrangements of n elements where all n elements are out of order.
    Superfactorial:
    Πₖ₌₁ⁿ(k!)
    Hyperfactorial:
    Πₖ₌₁ⁿ(kᵏ)
    Ultrafactorial:
    Πₖ₌₁ⁿ((k!)^(k!))

  • @geekwhoeatsrice
    @geekwhoeatsrice Рік тому

    You can even count the number of trailing zeros with these factorials. There's a REALLY CUTE way that uses the floor function.

  • @XxCrystalPhoenix
    @XxCrystalPhoenix Рік тому +5

    This entire channel is phenomenal.

  • @berni_schmorg
    @berni_schmorg Рік тому +2

    HAHAHAHA at 15:49 I think domotro and I were making the EXACT same face at each other AAAAAAAHHHHHH what

  • @antagonisticalex401
    @antagonisticalex401 Рік тому

    My three favourite topics in maths are Permutations Combinations, Probability, and Statistics. So let's just say I'm a huge fan and leave it at that.

  • @aksela6912
    @aksela6912 Рік тому +2

    Factorials grow really quickly, and some computer systems have a hard time calculating big ones, but if you're only interested in knowing how many digits you'd need to write a factorial, there is a much less computationally intensive way to do it. If you remember how to use logarithms you can maybe figure it out.
    Hint:
    log(A) + log(B) = log(A*B)

    • @monhi64
      @monhi64 Рік тому +1

      I remember messing around on a calculator and noticing 2^2^2 is only 16 but just 3^3^3
      is already in the trillions which was kind of wild to me

    • @aksela6912
      @aksela6912 Рік тому

      @@monhi64 I was about to say that doesn't seem right, but then I remembered you can associate both left and right. (3^3)^3 is only moderately large, but 3^(3^3) is, as you say, in the trillions.

  • @seize2581
    @seize2581 Рік тому

    "Pi and e hanging out in there !" made me laugh 😄Gotta admit that's pretty crazy !

  • @bongo50_
    @bongo50_ Рік тому +4

    Good video. I like the ending!

  • @katakana1
    @katakana1 Рік тому +2

    9:35 Although, 432 is a cool first number for that pattern to break given that it's 4! * 3! * 3. More factorials...

  • @RedRamDRA
    @RedRamDRA Рік тому +1

    Glad you brought up playing cards, one of my most favorite math-in-action examples.
    52! is a number so huge, it's like holding a small universe in your hands.

  • @berni_schmorg
    @berni_schmorg Рік тому +1

    Goddam! Mister Domotro, you had me totally bamboozled there! I really thought i was getting myself into a factorial factory for a factorial fact tutorial but luckily it was Combo Class afterall...

  • @MarloTheBlueberry
    @MarloTheBlueberry Рік тому

    "Welcome to the factorial factory for factorial fact tutorial, unfractured edition!"

  • @jameelmaki
    @jameelmaki Рік тому +5

    Thanks a million! Your channel is one of my favorites. I love it. Fantastic job! Keep up the great work. God bless you.

  • @kenhaley4
    @kenhaley4 Рік тому +2

    Easier way to explain why 0! = 1: Notice that 5!/5 = 4! and 4!/4 = 3, etc. In general, n!/n = (n-1)! So 1! / 1 should be 0!. Thus 0! = 1

  • @joshuaklein8429
    @joshuaklein8429 Рік тому +1

    Alright this is a fun channel. Keep it up, I can't wait to hear more!

  • @Risperdali
    @Risperdali Рік тому

    Your channel keeps coming up in my recommended. i finally officially subscribed. Nice work!

  • @matthewlennon6289
    @matthewlennon6289 Рік тому

    Been watching a lot of your videos, great stuff. Fascinated by the primes, and I never realized the importance of the number 4!

  • @nicholaswilson1310
    @nicholaswilson1310 Рік тому

    Oh man, I love it when pi and e hang out together!

  • @guyedwards22
    @guyedwards22 Рік тому +1

    That intro hit my funny bone out of left field man; keep making videos, your personality is simply splendid and your content thoroughly interesting ❤️

  • @laz001
    @laz001 Рік тому +1

    Love it, that was so fun and clearly explained!

  • @jatniel3297
    @jatniel3297 Рік тому

    Such an underrated gem of a channel!!

  • @hallucinogender3810
    @hallucinogender3810 Місяць тому

    When this reached the part about how 432! does something special, my initial thought was along the lines of "if a large number is going to introduce something special to a pattern, of course it'd be something like 432, that's twice the cube of 6, it has a lot of factors and comes up often". And then it turns out that the special thing it does is _breaking_ a divisibility pattern? Bizarre.

  • @mousaey
    @mousaey Рік тому

    I like your use of set pieces to demonstrate the universe's tendency toward entropy.

  • @thecarman3693
    @thecarman3693 Рік тому

    Funny thing about that last curve for fractional factorials ... it actually dips down between 0 and 1 before taking off again, meaning there is a minimum value less than one. Yes, a value less than 1 given that both 0! and 1! equal 1.

  • @lexinwonderland5741
    @lexinwonderland5741 Рік тому

    Once again, you never fail to amaze with your unique interpretations. Factorials being highly divisible relating to common intervals of time being made from multiple small prime numbers? 8! minutes in February? That's absolutely brilliant! I'm absolutely stealing that for future use. Keep up the great work m8!

  • @a2g555
    @a2g555 Рік тому +2

    Hey dimitri and carlo, I really enjoy your videos about math. I'm always getting my mind blown by how complex but beautiful math is (even though I'm in grade 11 and still haven't mastered what I'm being taught lol). Keep up the good work and I'm 100% sure you'll make it big one day and get the attention you deserve. Love you, from an avid combo class student ❤️🫶

  • @matthijshebly
    @matthijshebly 11 місяців тому +1

    I love this channel so much

  • @nottaibo
    @nottaibo Рік тому

    Man I loved this video, I'll watch it a weird number of times, like 7! Maybe more!

  • @Kaztalek
    @Kaztalek Рік тому

    my favorite factorial fact is that the product of (n) consecutive integers is always divisible by (n!). for example, 58*59*60*61*62 (5 consecutive integers) is divisible by 120 (5!)

  • @maynardtrendle820
    @maynardtrendle820 Рік тому

    I almost never make it through a whole video because I get so many ideas along the way! A really great channel! 🐢

  • @ceulgai2817
    @ceulgai2817 Рік тому

    Alright, this is my third or so video of yours I've watched, and the fact you used the actual definition of factorial instead of leaving it at "1x2x...xn" means that you're worth your salt. Glad to be a new subscriber, and I can't wait to watch your channel grow!

  • @Chewychaca
    @Chewychaca Рік тому

    I actually love that he keeps dropping shit.

  • @archeacnos
    @archeacnos Рік тому

    Your channel is gold, hope it'll grow soon

  • @steelegagnon5273
    @steelegagnon5273 Рік тому +2

    great class professor!

  • @mralexxx4400
    @mralexxx4400 Рік тому

    You are absolutely 💯 awesome! Interesting! Knowledgeable, Diffrent! And More!

  • @kenj4136
    @kenj4136 11 місяців тому

    You kinda feel like the 'beakmans world' of mathematics. Just need a guy In giant rat costume :) Love it

  • @bigbeans202
    @bigbeans202 Рік тому

    God I love this channel I'm so sad it's not any bigger

  • @philipoakley5498
    @philipoakley5498 Місяць тому

    Those cards: one deal per second, every billion years, one 1cm step along the equator, each time you pass the pacific empty out a medicine spoon (5mL) of water, every time it empties add a sheet of A4 paper to the pile, every time you reach the moon start actually counting, when you get to the millionth visit, realise you are not even 90% of the way to having completed the exercise (Oh, the universe ended aeons ago)!

  • @simonwillover4175
    @simonwillover4175 2 місяці тому

    In complex analytics, we define it with just 2 rules:
    * factorial(0) = 1
    * factorial(z) = z * factorial(z - 1)
    * factorial is continuous and it's 1st derivative is continuous too
    * or is the rule that all derivates must be?
    * some rules on complex derivatitves, based on the real derivatives of functions defined by the 1st 3 rules

  • @nbooth
    @nbooth Рік тому +2

    I see Stirling's Approximation scores another point for tau against pi.

  • @atrsarst7158
    @atrsarst7158 Рік тому +3

    My favorite number is 5!

  • @samjarvis9745
    @samjarvis9745 Рік тому

    This man may be the greatest teacher of all time he’s so passionate and charismatic

  • @wandrespupilo8046
    @wandrespupilo8046 Рік тому +1

    this is so underrated!!!!

  • @Xnoob545
    @Xnoob545 Рік тому +1

    Great video! wasn't the stunt at the end dangerous though?
    also I've mean meaning to talk to you about some areas in math I've explored, but haven't gotten around to it, I'll do it eventually though

  • @TD-er
    @TD-er Рік тому +1

    Those clocks in your yard are really great!
    It makes you realize, it is time for some fun :)
    Or time for math, depending on your perception.

    • @TigruArdavi
      @TigruArdavi Рік тому

      fun and maths are not mutually exclusive.

    • @TD-er
      @TD-er Рік тому +1

      @@TigruArdavi neither is "or" :)

  • @doriannlegrande5048
    @doriannlegrande5048 10 місяців тому

    It is helping my daughter and brushing me up.🎉 I enjoy it.

  • @antonbashkin6706
    @antonbashkin6706 Рік тому

    This one is a lot of fun and very funny 😂

  • @RafaelAAMerlo
    @RafaelAAMerlo Рік тому +1

    Excellent video as hinted on the Discord channel!
    What this video made me curious was about Permutations / Combinations: what if the things I'm ordering have some kind of characteristics to them that would sub-group them? Like in a deck of cards some numbers are printed in different colors (like Spades, Cups, etc), or when something have more than one sub-grouping characristic in uneven quantities? How to model this on mathematical terms?

  • @TalsBadKidney
    @TalsBadKidney Рік тому +1

    TO THE MOOOOOON

  • @VisComicaV
    @VisComicaV Рік тому

    You deserve 17k! subs!

  • @SuperYoonHo
    @SuperYoonHo Рік тому +1

    fantastic factorial factory for a fun free factorial fact frenzy f-uhh_video 😂 f-thanks

  • @dyhnen8977
    @dyhnen8977 Рік тому

    Could you go through the general solution of Navier Stockes next class ?
    Need this for fluid dynamics

  • @cryptobogdan
    @cryptobogdan Рік тому

    Awesome. One small tip I have would be maybe always speak towards the mic, because the sound gets distorted.

  • @sobertillnoon
    @sobertillnoon Рік тому

    Who wouldn't have clocks to arrange? That's crazy talk.

  • @finlordlegendarygamer7014
    @finlordlegendarygamer7014 Рік тому

    Ooh, fire. I'm going to try that at home because I didn't see a warning.

  • @birdbird7714
    @birdbird7714 Рік тому

    The fire at the end tho

  • @codatheseus5060
    @codatheseus5060 Рік тому +1

    Talking about noninteger factorials reminds me of that video I watched on 1/2 derivatives and antiderivatives
    I'd like to know if gaussian primorials are useful

  • @ajaxflaskaarbra9915
    @ajaxflaskaarbra9915 8 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @KingYejob
    @KingYejob Рік тому

    I find it so funny that I can hear birds in the background

  • @babygirl_lunaa9096
    @babygirl_lunaa9096 Рік тому

    Combo Class: keeping me excited for the math portion of my CS degree and tempting me to switch one video at a time

    • @navjotsingh2251
      @navjotsingh2251 Рік тому +1

      If you have the option, do numerical methods module, discrete mathematics (sometimes called algebraic structures) and also automata theory. All are really interesting theories that have applications to both computer science and mathematics as a whole.

  • @Gunbudder
    @Gunbudder Рік тому

    5:07 Statistically, 7 shuffles is considered a good shuffle, and a wash shuffle is the most fair. a skilled card player can riffle shuffle in such a way that the cards never actually change position by more than 1, and an even number of these perfect riffle shuffles will result in the deck not having changed its order at all. there are handful of seemingly impossible magic tricks that rely on a perfect riffle shuffle to be done at least twice

    • @ComboClass
      @ComboClass  Рік тому

      Most of that is true but since you split the deck in half when doing shuffles, it takes more than 2 perfect riffle shuffles to reset a deck. Can be done with 8 “out-shuffle” riffle shuffles though. I’ll make an episode about that sometime :)

  • @sobertillnoon
    @sobertillnoon Рік тому

    "I could talk all day about factorials." Um... I think you did .

  • @chazzbunn7811
    @chazzbunn7811 Рік тому +1

    Great video, I'm a mathematician too, and I was wondering if you would mention non-whole-number factorials and the gamma function. You kind of did at the end. What I like about your channel is that you present things in an interesting way that can be understood by a general audience. I was wondering "how is he going to talk about the gamma function, which requires all this complicated integral calculus?"

    • @ComboClass
      @ComboClass  Рік тому +1

      Yeah the gamma function will be tricky to explain in an easily understandable way, and didn’t fit in this episode more than that brief mention, but I’ll try making an episode about it at some point :)

    • @Xnoob545
      @Xnoob545 Рік тому

      @@ComboClass oh by the way, the pi function exists, which isn't offset by 1 and also the integral for it looks even slightly simpler

    • @navjotsingh2251
      @navjotsingh2251 Рік тому

      @@ComboClass not everything has to be simplified, even if you approached it with all its complexities but made it easy to digest I'd still say you were successful.

  • @erdmannelchen8829
    @erdmannelchen8829 Рік тому

    A way to get a lower bounds on how many digits a certain factorial has is thinking about how many times the number with n digits is multiplied with another up to your factorial, then multiply that result with n to get a number, lets call it Z (for Zeroes) and then just add how many n-1 digit numbers there are and multiply that by n-1, repeat until you reach 2-digit numbers.
    I know what I've written is a bit convuluted, but I don't know a better way to describe it. So here's an example.
    432! has at least how many digits?
    There are 432-100 3 digit numbers. So 332 3-digit numbers. 332*3 is 996.
    There are 89 2-digit numbers. So 89*2 is 178. | 996+178 = 1174
    So by this example, 432! has at the very minimum 1174 digits.

  • @elephantdinosaur2284
    @elephantdinosaur2284 Рік тому

    For tetrationial factorials:
    1 = 1
    2 ↑↑ 1 = 2
    3 ↑↑ 2 ↑↑ 1 = 27
    4 ↑↑ 3 ↑↑ 2 ↑↑ 1 = 4 ↑↑ 27 is really big
    For context
    4 ↑↑ 2 = 256
    4 ↑↑ 3 = 4 ↑ 256 = 1.3 * 10^154
    4 ↑↑ 4 = 4 ↑ 1.3 * 10^154 has 8.0 * 10^153 digits
    ...
    4 ↑↑ 27 is unimaginably large.
    The fact about 432! and the primality for the alternating factorials is very surprising and counter-intuitive.

  • @jamez6398
    @jamez6398 9 місяців тому +1

    Is there a symbol for adding up all of the numbers between 1 and a certain number, or exponentiating all of the numbers between 1 and a certain number?

  • @shreyjain3197
    @shreyjain3197 Рік тому +1

    the lengths he goes to make his videos interesting..

  • @SpecTwo
    @SpecTwo Рік тому +1

    i feel the urgent need to play factorio now ..
    the factory must !

  • @ausaramun
    @ausaramun Рік тому

    Nothing beats TREE(3)

  • @ofconsciousness
    @ofconsciousness Рік тому

    Once upon a time, someone loved math so much that the love itself became incarnate, put on a lab coat, and started breaking clocks.

  • @JuliusUnique
    @JuliusUnique Рік тому

    wtf I never knew our time-system is so related to factorials, cool fun fact

  • @kikivoorburg
    @kikivoorburg Рік тому

    I would personally write “multifactorials” as ‘x !_n’ (subscript n), and reserve ‘x!!’ for ‘(x!)!’.
    I also generally support the use of superscripts for function composition so that f^2 (x) = f(f(x)), but that’s thrown off by the very strange notation sin^2(x) = (sin(x))^2.

  • @Bovineprogrammer
    @Bovineprogrammer Рік тому

    I like swinging factorials the most ~

  • @bigfgreatsword
    @bigfgreatsword Рік тому +1

    (You're awesome)!

  • @NoOffenseAnimation
    @NoOffenseAnimation Рік тому

    factorials are one of my favorite parts of math