The Byzantine School | Part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
  • #atheism
    Bible Translation
    Textus Receptus
    King James Version
    #kjv
    #kjb
    #kjvo
    King James Only
    James White
    Stephen Boyce
    Mark Ward
    Dwayne Green
    Elijah Hixson
    Timothy Berg
    NKJV
    MEV
    Contradictions
    Bart Ehrman
    #debate
    Scrivener
    Dean Burgon
    Textual Confidence Collective
    Textual Absolutism
    Cultish
    Cult
    Matthew Everhard
    Dr. Sean McDowell
    Andrew Sluder
    Jeff Riddle
    TurretinFan
    Bryan Ross
    Biblical Studies and Reviews
    Stephen Hackett
    #ruckmanite
    Ruckman
    Ruckmanism
    Toxic
    Groupthink
    Association fallacy
    #unicorns
    Wild Ox
    Aurochs
    Reem
    Dutch Bible
    Statenvertaling
    Knust
    #nrsv
    New Revised Standard Version
    Jennifer Knust
    #easter
    Tabernacles
    Sabbath
    Thomas Ross
    Legacy Standard Bible
    LSB
    Kent Hovind
    Matthew 1
    Matt Furse
    Texe Marrs
    Standing For Truth
    Patrick Boyle
    Alan Kurschner
    Falling Away
    Ethiopic
    Steven Anderson
    I AM
    #jehovah
    #nifb
    New IFB
    Praise the I AM
    Donny Budinski
    #newtestament
    #Westcott & Hort
    #interview
    Bible Version Conspiracy
    Gail Riplinger
    Maurice Robinson
    #Trump
    Timothy Decker
    Will Kinney
    Phil Stringer
    Kirk DiVietro
    Korea
    Taylor Desoto
    Melissa Dougherty
    iThink Biblically
    Caleb Corneloup
    Allie Beth Stuckey
    Editio Critica Maior
    Alan Stewart
    Mike Hollner
    Mike Ferrando
    Song by Udio
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3

  • @Pastor-Brettbyfaith
    @Pastor-Brettbyfaith 24 дні тому +2

    I am watching the replay now. Good job Nick. I hope you have a full recovery from the sickness you encountered. Blessings to you brother.

  • @jamessheffield4173
    @jamessheffield4173 24 дні тому +2

    When Erasmus classified the texts into two classes, one representing the Complutenian edition and the other the Vaticanus, he specified the positive grounds upon receiving the former and rejecting the latter. The former was in the possession of the Greek Church, the latter in that of the Latin; judging from the internal evidence he had as good reason to conclude the Eastern church had not corrupted their received text as he had grounds to suspect the Rhodians from whom the Western church derived their manuscripts, had accommodated them to the Latin Vulgate. One short insinuation which he has thrown out, sufficiently provides that his objections to these manuscripts lay more deep; and they do immortal credit to his sagacity. In the age in which the Vulgate was formed, the church, he was aware, was infested with Origenists and Arians; an affinity between any manuscript and that version, consequently conveyed some suspicion that its text was corrupted." An Inquiry into the Integrity of the Greek Vulgate or Received Text of the New Testament, 1815, p 413ff