I have this and Nique review is spot on. Really excellent review for people to understand if this is right for them. Not only the mechanics of the deck but also the phycological aspect of what's needed to perform, something a lot of reviewers don't address. Well done Nique
Thank you for another great review Nique. You cover all of the bases as usual. I love that you emphasize the need for practice with the method used for divining the card. Being a mere hobbyist, it is sometimes tough to get that sort of practice under your belt lest it becomes a painful expedition. While it sounds like a great deck, I may sit this one out...at least for a few days or so...LOL
Thank you watching and your support! Am glad you got value out of the video! As for the practice, it isn’t the most difficult thing in the world and I’m sure you’ll get it down pretty fast. Again, note that due to the nature of the method, it’s not entirely repeatable; just in case you usually only perform for the same group of people. 👍🏻
On the mpd you get a joker with the info on it if you can't remember the formula so to speak. Great review. Just as I typed this out you mentioned what I've just stated. But still posted.
If like this kind of effect, please also check the Linking Ring (July 2021 : “Raison d’Etre” by Henk Raison. No gaffed deck, no red/black question, no equivoque …
Excellent, detailed review! This was my first time seeing one of your reviews, you have a new subscriber, keep up the great work! And who is the one dimwit that gave this review a thumbs down??? What a tool...
Bought this from one of my Chinese magic shop suppliers and it arrived without the code for the instructional video... Wasted 20 bucks if I can't figure out how to use the gaff deck
Good review There is a possibility of getting a Double negative from the 1st spectator But the reveal of the card they thought of really sells it though and makes them forget about the 2 misses you get before hand A strong effect and the Deck alone is worth the prize Must have for mentalists
Yo, i have another question For the first part( when you name the chosen card), do you have to ask the spectator some questions before you name the card?
What a great, truly informative (useful) review. Thanks for this. From [the little] I know about Divine and Conquer isn't there a bit of 'danger' in letting the spectator handle the cards?
There is; which puts us in a strange situation as that is simultaneously the strength and risk of this method. You’ll really have to keep tabs on your spectator during this phase.
Do a deck switch after the 2nd spectator selects the card mentally. I would recommend The Art of Switching Deck by Roberto Giobbi That has so many good deck switches & you end up clean too👍
If by “stack” you’re referring to specific “mem-work” with decks, then no, you don’t need that. But the cards need to be in the same order for each performance.
I have this and Nique review is spot on. Really excellent review for people to understand if this is right for them. Not only the mechanics of the deck but also the phycological aspect of what's needed to perform, something a lot of reviewers don't address. Well done Nique
Thank you for watching! 🤗
Nique, you always put out excellent reviews thank you!
Thank you for the kind words!
Thank you for another great review Nique. You cover all of the bases as usual. I love that you emphasize the need for practice with the method used for divining the card. Being a mere hobbyist, it is sometimes tough to get that sort of practice under your belt lest it becomes a painful expedition. While it sounds like a great deck, I may sit this one out...at least for a few days or so...LOL
Thank you watching and your support! Am glad you got value out of the video! As for the practice, it isn’t the most difficult thing in the world and I’m sure you’ll get it down pretty fast. Again, note that due to the nature of the method, it’s not entirely repeatable; just in case you usually only perform for the same group of people. 👍🏻
On the mpd you get a joker with the info on it if you can't remember the formula so to speak. Great review. Just as I typed this out you mentioned what I've just stated. But still posted.
The detail and insight in this review has made me subscribe and also get notifications. I really love how you do this!
Thank you Sean! 🤗
Mind Power deck is still in the top 5 gaffed decks and there it will stay.
Excellent Review. Congratulations!
Thanks for watching!
Wonderful review, Nique. Very helpful. Thank you!
Thanks; am glad you found it useful!
Hi ya. I was searching for a review on this deck. Found you for first time. Excellent stuff. You've got a new subscriber. You'll hit 1k very soon👍
Hi Gary! Thank you very much for the kind words! Glad you found the video useful! 🤗🤗🤗
I love Divine and Conquer!
Great video Nique! Glad you like Divine and Conquer.
Thank you so much for watching! Again, you really did a great job on the tutorial video! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for a great review 👍. Nice comparison with mind power deck as well
Thank you for watching; glad you enjoyed it!
Keep up your chats and reviews
superb and informative review - subscribed!
Thank you! Glad you got something out of the video! 🤗
Great review as always, very useful
If like this kind of effect, please also check the Linking Ring (July 2021 : “Raison d’Etre” by Henk Raison. No gaffed deck, no red/black question, no equivoque …
Excellent, detailed review! This was my first time seeing one of your reviews, you have a new subscriber, keep up the great work! And who is the one dimwit that gave this review a thumbs down??? What a tool...
Hahaha! Thanks for watching and thanks for subscribing! 👍🏻
I would suggest getting the spectator to deal the cards into your hand for this effect.
Great handling suggestion!
This is great 😊
is it also familiar to "card to pocket by the other brothers"?
thanks for the review
Sorry man, I’m not familiar with that effect!
Awesome Bro!!
Guess i'm ur 850 subs!! hahaha....
@@HobbyKakis Haha thank you! 🤗
@@niquetan Keep it going man!
Ihave received thé spécial deck for divine and conquer but I did'nt get the explanation vidéo link
Somebody can help me ?
Thanks in advance
Just drop Penguin Magic an email and I’m sure they can sort you out! 👍🏻
Bought this from one of my Chinese magic shop suppliers and it arrived without the code for the instructional video... Wasted 20 bucks if I can't figure out how to use the gaff deck
Great review, always looking forward to your channel. Nique, don't both of these look like 52-1? Thx!
Thank you! Yeah, some people have actually mentioned this to me too! However, unfortunately I don’t have that particular product. 😬
@@niquetan Thank you, Nique!
Great review.
I love this trick. When i perform it i get great reactions.
Dan harlen's performance at the end of the tutorial video is awesome
Hi Niq awesome review as always, do u have any shop recommendation to buy this gimmick in SG?
Drop me a message on Facebook and I’ll send you a link.
Subscribed.
Good review
There is a possibility of getting a Double negative from the 1st spectator
But the reveal of the card they thought of really sells it though and makes them forget about the 2 misses you get before hand
A strong effect and the Deck alone is worth the prize
Must have for mentalists
+ 1 подписчик из России. Всё классно!
Thank you. 👍🏻
Yo, i have another question
For the first part( when you name the chosen card), do you have to ask the spectator some questions before you name the card?
There is some banter between you and the spectators. Have a look at Steve Faulkner’s Review on the Mind Power Deck.
What a great, truly informative (useful) review. Thanks for this.
From [the little] I know about Divine and Conquer isn't there a bit of 'danger' in letting the spectator handle the cards?
There is; which puts us in a strange situation as that is simultaneously the strength and risk of this method. You’ll really have to keep tabs on your spectator during this phase.
Do a deck switch after the 2nd spectator selects the card mentally.
I would recommend The Art of Switching Deck by Roberto Giobbi
That has so many good deck switches & you end up clean too👍
Hi Nique, so do u need any specific deck stack for performance provided that there is some set up for the position of the cards?
If by “stack” you’re referring to specific “mem-work” with decks, then no, you don’t need that. But the cards need to be in the same order for each performance.
Okay great and thanks for your reply. In this case, is it possible to have a different section for every performance?
@@limgh1 I’m not quite sure what you mean?
Oh sorry, I meant, is the selection the same for each performance? Apologies for the typo
@@limgh1 from 12:23 onwards I discuss that the effect isn’t something I recommend repeating. 👍🏻
Subscribed.
Thank you! 🤗