A Dog by Any Other Name
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- The plaintiff asked the defendant to watch her dog for a few weeks because she needed to pay her pet deposit. She claims the defendant not only refuses to return the pet, but she even gave it to her stepsister, who changed the dog’s name. The plaintiff claims the defendant and the woman’s stepsister won’t give her the dog back, so she’s suing for the cost of the dog. The defendant argues the plaintiff couldn’t take care of the dog, now he’s in a better home with her stepsister.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court
You could tell how evil the defendant was from what the flyer said. My mommy can't afford to pay my rent. Smh
Yea why would you say that?
I see nothing wrong with the truth and most people want to know why someone is getting rid of it.
You don't like the EXACT truth?
@seth82481 it could have just said i need a home and people would have inquired.
Most christians are evil in my opinion
If she didn’t have $50, what makes you think she would have 350 smh .
Exactly - The defendants seemed justified and genuine until their TRUE colors came out by trying to extort the plaintiff for $350 smh - Those two women are not Godly.
Right
@@Stressless2023 hi.. are any of .. ..those.... people...? Godly???
b and b people... who havent learned... will surely learn one day... when will that day come? who know... not me... be blessed
That doesn't have nothing to do with NOTHING
The bigger the cross, the bigger the hypocrite. Never trust anyone in court with a very public cross around their neck.
After nine days and we supposed to be on friends you could have just chalked it up as a misunderstanding and gave her the dog back
Not sure how it would be a misunderstand when the plaintiffs own mother said in the VM she didn’t have permission to give the dog away
“Oh, the dog was in horrible condition! But for the right price I’ll forget about all that!” What scum bags!
Exactly!
@@back-corner-turningsYAS! That REALLY upset me… they gave her an impossible option, knowing full well she couldn’t meet any of their options.
@@hadley407 what language would have been better for these church ladies. They had the dog for a short period if time and could have easily given the dog back. I am very shocked at the judges decision which I believe the plaintiffs inability to care for the dog played a role in her decision. I wish they could've taken care of this outside of court.
Also, her bringing up the fact that after church the kids are always complaining that they’re hungry so she takes her to the store seemed a little messy like she was was low key trying to make her look bad. We all know everyone is hungry after church and can’t wait to go eat a plentiful Sunday meal!
Right!
She could've bought her own kids food. Quit being beggars.
If someone was giving me rides and food I wouldn't sue them, especially after texts show I GAVE them the dog.
Agreed. She was putting her down to make her look bad. That's so messed up. What kind of church person behaves like that ON TELEVISION
Right
The defendants are some holier-than-thou fake Christian Karens. They plotted on how to get that dog. I'm glad JM called them out on their bs. Shame on them.
best comment under this video
Oh, be quiet! They plotted? You're as dramatic as the plaintiff...OH POOR ME...POOR MEEEE.
@janicester you have more issues than the plaintiff if you're defending the fake Christian Karens in question here and making fun of people for their opinions like a literal child😂
@@janicester But you're not overly dramatic with all of the capital letters in your comment. Right.
@ Well if you say so then it must be. Seeing as your best friends with them and knowing their life story. The plaintiff was a looney and I'm glad she lost. 😂 😂😂
Supposedly church ladies😂😂😂😂
Those overly large crosses.🙄 I get it! I get it! You're pious and a faithful servant. 🙄
Church people suck.
That's what I thought when all of them were done walking in. Both sides wearing them around their necks, all out & obvious, like nuns 😂 Seriously
😂😅
What does "my book coming out and my son is an actor" have to do with the dog? 🙄
Absolutely nothing!!
@@nadeawilliams7749At all 😅
she was plugging her and her son’s business because shes on tv. i feel bad for her kids who loved that dog, but that was weird and showed their mother never cared about the dog or how her kids would feel
Clearly there’s some mental problems here🤦🏾♀️ who get a bog n can’t pay their rent. Most apartments aren’t paying attention to pet unless their making noise
She's trying to prove that she's not a loser like how they tried to make her look in court i.e. dog matted, kids hungry, doesn't have a car, can't pay pet rent.
The defendants are cruel people
On the recording, the mom said the dog is registered in her name. Can the mom file her own lawsuit against the defendants since the dog is legally considered property??
Sounds like it should be possible…
(Not a lawyer though)
She most definitely can and she'd win, a dog is property, just like a car, you cannot sell either without the registered owners' consent. You can't gift registered property to anyone else.
Those two church going women are shameless. I spent $60, but I want $350. The plantiff should not have had a pet but those two thought they were holier than thou.
They all shameless
That part.... I wouldn't have come to court. I would've went and got my dog but im different
@@TheZogie and gone to jail as it wouldn't be your dog anymore lol
@megalines8888 nah.. trust me.. if she would've taken the dog back that next week. No money exchanged the police would've left her alone. They might have told the missionaries to go to court but . Anyway. Your thirsty for attention enjoy your day
What a mess! Part of me feels like she should have just given the dog back.
I want to feel bad for the plaintiff because I think the defendants should’ve just returned the dog. But the reality is the plaintiff gave the dog away. It’s theirs. Her mom wants the dog back now but once the mom gave the dog away it was no longer hers. Everybody just needs to understand you can’t always change your mind and take things back.
That would have been fine if the defendants didn't ultimately become opportunists and try to extort her for $350 bucks.
It's true, and that's why the defendants won. But it doesn't make it any less heartless that after having the dog only a week and seeing what turmoil it was causing you, they wouldn't look into their hearts and give the dog back, unless they made a profit off the situation. Very tacky and cold in my opinion
All of these women did wrong but the sisters were way wrong , one week , when the young lady mother started sending the nasty messages they should have seen this is really not this woman dog and I am giving it back , and the lady didn’t have to say yeah when she has money I take her to the store because the kids be saying their hungry. All that didn’t need to be said
@@shawns.9832 Or the mom shouldn't be instantly jumping to making threats and demands. Ultimately the plantiff likely lied to her mom about having not given away the dog which resulted in the mom bitching out the defendents and tanking any good will they might've had. It's all on the plantiff for messing everything up and lying.
Facts!!
Harvey she’s not dramatic. They knew what they were doing!
Right! Harvey is so racist! But god forbid anything negative is said abt the Jewish community!
Both sides were ridiculous here.. and plaintiff was dramatic bringing up her son acting and her book out??!! Wth?? Both sides people behaving badly
She WAS dramatic. I'm not buying those crocodile tears either.
He was a disgusting piece of trash to say that.
I hate that man. He always finds a way to say some BS
if you got those voicemails, why not just give the dog back
Those text messages cooked her. That’s why she started crying while the judge was reading them. I believe her mom is giving her hell about it and this is just another thing added to their already strained relationship; might’ve even stopped talking to her because of this. Sounds like she only trying hard to get the dog back so it could further mend her and her mom relationship.
Her mom shoulda paid the dog rent
100% agree that’s exactly what happen.
They both made mistakes.
Pet rent is such a scam !!!
Not really. All HUD properties charge them.
@@davemathews7890it is income for landlord. It is a scam. I am a landlord. I see where that money goes. It does not go towards damages. If you move out and your pet caused $100 in damages and you paid $500 in pet rent fees, you will still be charged that $100… it’s not coming out of the $500. It’s 100% just income for landlord. Period. HUD or not, it’s scam.
@@davemathews7890it is a scam 🙄. Soon they’ll be charging you for how many kids you got in the house 😂. Nah but it is a scam tho
If that’s how you or anyone feels, don’t rent from those places that charge a monthly pet fee. Problem solved
@danmiller8223 like i said a scam
This poor dog, I hope he is safe and happy now.
It had only been a week?! Free? Give it back!!!!
NO NOT THE DEAL
The defendant is a scammer and horrible person.
But the plaintiff is a drama queen.
you mean the PLAINTIFF right?
You’re crazy!!
I am referring to the defendant trying to get $300 for the dog. I know the plaintiff got her own issues.
@@mercadeze blackmail is not a very honest thing to do.
The Defendant is such a despicable person. Just give her the dog.
did you not hear how the plaintiff was talking about the dog? saying its ruining her life and she wants it gone?
the defendant definitely saved that dog
The plaintiff should have sued for the return of the dog if she truly wanted it back. She seemed more upset that she couldn’t recoup the money she had to pay for the pet fees.
@@russellhunter363 They MUST put a monetary value on the dog when they sue, because pets are seen as property in the law. She CANNOT just ask for the dog.
@ You're right about that. However, it didn't seem like the plaintiff wanted the dog back even if she didn't get any money. She seemed to not care about the dog. 😞
The letter to sell the dog is outta control. I need a home because my mother can't pay the rent.
FINALLY Harvey asks a good question.
Shameless promotion and her son isn’t the only actor in the family 😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Not a good look.
hi.. promotion is what you took away.. from this case?? you sound like harvey!...why you didn't mention... her talking about her 'good church"...instead you focus on..1 thing. spoken by an emotional lady...who had a whole closet of thoughts racing through her mind.. probably wasn't even aware of.. what was coming out..the mouth!.. ..you never been in situation like that before???
...you overlook the llies.. the thefft .. the scaam...the extortion.... all actions...of typical christians. like.. the defendants....they have been doing this for centuries... but still many b and b people haven't learn to be cautious.....be blessed
That lady took advantage of her situation. You could clearly tell that she wasn’t acting.
@@Cubanflowers Mentioning your book and your son being an actor during a so called emotional rant is comedy. You believe that was real after she was willing to sell the dog that she cares so much about and wasn’t taking care of properly. The truth is her mother was on her about getting the dog back and yes that was f’d trying extort money out of her however she gave that dog away and now regrets it.
She’s cray cray. Her mom must be even crazier if she’s that scared of her that she would lie and take this all the way to court.
You're out of line .. sounds like the defendants
The plaintiff don't care about that dog, all the drama is because she don't wanna deal with her mama after all this!!!😂😂
I believe the defendants are evil for what they did. They should have given her the dog back. 🤷🏽♀️
People don't understand that there are resources in these situations. I was homeless for almost 3 months, and I knew I would be. I called EVERYBODY I could asking them to foster my dog. I made it CRYSTAL CLEAR that I was not giving up my dog- I just needed someone to keep him for me until we could find a home. I found a WONDERFUL family who kept my dog for me, let me visit him and wouldn't even take my money to take care of him! I was SO BLESSED but I wasn't going to give up my dog for anything!!
I've always been fascinated by the law and justice. But even more fascinating is how willing people are in airing their dirty laundry on TV!
Yes' 🤷🏾♀️
hi.. yes.. i ask... all the time.. what makes.. people to come on the tv.. to tell their business.. to embarrass themselves.. are they are embarrassed??... be blessed
And throw their religious beliefs into everything.
Too many people have pets and can’t afford them 🤦🏾♂️
Homeless people have dogs legally
@ What does its legal have to do with my statement 🤔 Ohhhh I get it you want attention you got what you wanted
@@bongoikno4994❓What does that even mean?Having a pet is legal for everyone unless a judge says otherwise.
Say it forget it, write it regret it!
😒😒😒😒
The defendants are examples of fake Christians. Looking down on people in need & truly taking advantage when they have the opportunity. There is no shame in their actions
She should of gave the dog back to her mother until she was able to afford the monthly dog fee. I think the defendant had a hard time giving the dog back because I heard her say she lost her dog. This is a difficult case but at least the dog is happy and healthy.
She should have given the dog back to her mother!!
I hate those people who do something for another person and then keep holding that favor against them forever, while making themselves seem holier than the pope himself !!! 😡
The plaintiff needs adult suoervision. I have ZERO!! ZILCH!!, NADA!! , sympathy for her. Only a fool pays monthly rent for a pet.
plaintiff is ridiculous. sure the defendants could have just gave the dog back, but you gave away an apparently malnourished dog. i wouldn't want to give him back to the original owner either.
The plaintiff is a user no wonder she's broke. Mom gave her $250 and she tells them i only got $60. Then want to talk mess about the mom to the defendants and t alk mess about the defendant to the mom. Girl bye. Lesson learned.
It really shady charging someone a pet deposit and a monthly pet fee I would never ever enter a lease like that. It’s literally scam.
At the end of the day, the young lady couldn't afford the dog and upkeep. Bless her ❤️
That's why the dog's owner, her mom, 😊offered them their $60 to get the dog back
Homeless people have dogs legally
What did the book and her son being an actor have to do with anything? It’s the theatrics for me.
The judge is aweful
Yall crazy in these comments mad at the defendant when this is the plaintiffs fault.
The defendant wanted to get rid of the dog and then got grief from her family. That’s all.
The defendants are the ones who are being sued ya know.
At the end of the day, I don't care who wronged who, I only care that dog is taken cared of and I believe he is.
This is why ppl put stuff in WRITING & sign it.
2 secs in and the plaintiff isn’t suing for the dog.. 😳 Based on ALL the texts sent from plaintiff to defendant.. she did not want the dog. Her mom did and she was only trying to get the dog back cause her mom was giving her a hard time.
She's a good actress she can cry on cue
Frou Frou dogs are expensive as hell. They require a lot of maintenance. No way she could afford this dog in the long run based on her financial issues.
They should have just loaned me the money!!!
… and there we go. That was what she actually wanted.
The Plaintiff is ungrateful. She was fine until her Mother started going off about the dog. Those women tried to help her.
15:31 All My Life I Had To Fight!!!
Girl really? 🙄 Shoo please
The commenter is something else. When he said he’s not buying it. Buying it or not that woman pain is real. I guess empathy is dig so deep it’s not present in his perception
Yes, it was disgusting. She was more concerned with her mother though, you can tell, the mother was upset and it seems the mother has money but wasn't willing to give it to her and she finished burning bridges when she gave the dog away.
The thought of someone taking my dog and not returning it. There would be HELL TO PAY.
Why couldn't anyone in her family help her out?
she's likely already burned those bridges to the ground.
If you cannot afford $50/mo pet fee, you cant afford a pet.
Why do people get animals they cannot afford.
People can’t delay gratification and are financially so stupid most of the time
They don’t take into account all the expenses associated with pet ownership. If you do it properly.
Everyone talking bad about the defendants in the comments. Did yall not watch the same case I watched? The plaintiff was saying the dog RUINED her life and that she didnt want the dog anymore and was glad the dog was happy with the defendants!! Proving she gave them the dog!! How are the defendants the bad ones here?
YEP
I pay $35 per month per animal every month.
If you are in California, that is longer legal.
16:00 “justice my 🫏”. Douglas looked like he didn’t know how to react to that.
“I thought about selling it” she doesn’t even consider “it” family, or meaningful.
The $350 was probably a way to make her go away bc she didn’t have it. If the dog was really not being taken care of which I believe bc she didn’t buy the dog it was given to her kids then it is probably in a better home. Sad a poor dog had to go through that.
She can't take care of the dog. Period. Let the dog go to a good home. Selfish.
A pet is a living being… you dont pawn it off on a stranger while you scrape up the money to have it.
As bad as I feel for her, she took advantage of the friend expecting them to just give her the money. She couldn’t afford the dog but thought she could get them to pay some of the dogs expenses. She’s a user.
“She should have just Loaned me the money’
What a loser. Don’t be in a position with kids and pets where you let yourself get so backed into a corner $150 is gonna put you out in the stteeg
Giving away the dog was definitely not temporary, she can barely provide for the kids, let alone a dog too
I’d be a little more on the plaintiffs side if she didn’t refer to the dog as “it” over and over. 🥺 poor guy. I hope he’s had a great life!
What does her book coming out and her son being an actor have to do with anything?? She neglected a dog and it's in a good home now.. Amen
The plantif is a professional victim.
The little smirk she had on her face in the hallway.....is just sickening! They took advantage of that poor woman. Kicked her while she was on the ground.
The plaintiff appeared to be financially incapable of caring for the dog. Sad.
"Did you think it was a cute lil guy, or did ya know it was a dog"😂😂😂😂😂
The original family passed the dog to one another because none of them could afford to keep it. THEN DON'T HAVE A DOG! I'd never give up my dog to someone unless I was on death's door. I don't think it was temporary because she asked the mom for money to keep it and was told no. Well.........
Remember she's an actor.
I thought it was just me, but when I heard Harvey's last comment, I knew I was right. The plaintiff may have it very difficult, but she was very dramatic in the end, she just exploded.
The defendants ask for money and hide behind the excuse of being compassionate people with their huge crosses on their chests, as if to say "look at me, I have a good heart".
Who made the defendant's judge and jury? Some christians shaking my head
God told them they are better for the dog so keep him and they listened. When he told them to be kind and give the dog back, they didn't listen. Christians must have selective hearing if they want to be warriors of faith or whatever.
@@MagnolyiaGraceif that was true they wouldn’t have tried to get $350 from her
No accountability
Pets are like kids, if you can't afford them, then don't have them.
It should be a pet fee OR a pet deposit. Not both!
Not true. I have paid a pet deposit and a monthly pet fee that is added to the rent price.
I was a leasing agent, and we also had both.
It's up to the landlord
Sounds like an extra scam that landlords and owners of rental properties have devised. The pet deposit is for possible damage (stains, odors or something physical) done by the animal(s). What is the pet fee for? Are they going to start charging an infant fee for children under one year old?
@@themermaidstale5008 They will charge for anything they can get away with. Although I no longer work there, I am friends with those who still live there (small town). The mgmt now charges for any maintenance issues they fix. It's sad as it deters those, already living paycheck/paycheck, from reporting the issues. Unfortunately, they'll be charged with the damage upon move out.
Oh hell no! The dog deserves stability. The plaintiff wants money, not the dog.
“I have a book coming out, my son’s an actor…” What the heck was that?! How embarrassing. SHAMELESS (and weird) plug!
Why get a dog when you can't afford it. You don't just give/sell a dog unless you're bonded to it
The grandmother bought the dog for the kids, not the mother
Things happen. She probably could at the time. Besides, she didn't buy the dog. Her mother got it for the kids. I guess you didn't hear that part🤦♀️
@@1swaggatariusthe mother being the adult would swallow her pride and say I can’t afford to take care of a dog at this time.
Plaintiff hasn't seen her mother in 5 years pretty much sums it up.
THATS THIER NORMAL FAMILY SHE SAID...AND IT IS FOR LOTS OF THEM ....
I hope the dog is OK.
If the mom has the dog registered in her name, and the dog is being taken care of in her daughter's house, how is she able to give that piece of property which is the doll to someone else?
This lady is so ungrateful and entitled. She told so many lies even though this lady was so nice to her.
Why they bringing up "her children say they hungry" and try to say they are so holy when they have helped her? They tried to put someone down who already was in bad situation. Shame on these women. Yes she did give the dog but they were even worse how they looked down on someone needing helping hand.
wow didn't expect that 😮 so what happened to dog is a property Judge ? Give the danm dog back ladies. This is so evil
DOGS ARE PROPERTY AND SHE DIDNT PAY FOR THE SERVICES SO THY KEEP THE DOG!!
The dog is property and was given away. Just like if you give away a chair on Craigslist you can’t demand it back
She asked the defendant to help her find another home for the dog, to the extent that a notice was placed on a church bulletin board. She was rehoming the dog. Now the dog conveniently became a family pet, belonging to her mother , but has been living with the plaintiff in Florida for five years! It’s the plaintiff’s dog.
@user-li1kj1ds7i but she didn't receive anything in return or did I miss that ? judge could make her pay for expenses and got the dog back
No that’s not how it works. And thank god it isn’t! She wasn’t selling the dog, she gave it away because she couldnt pay the pet rent. Think of anything you’ve been given, is it right for the giver to demand it back?
Price boarding. In my area @$37/day, one week would be $259.
I gave my Son’s father his dog back (because it was a temporary stay), even though I took care of the dog real good. I never charged his dad anything for boarding. Some people like to get over others when it only suppose to be about sincerely helping someone.
my jaw dropped “u shouldve jump loaned me the money”😂😂entitled ass make a way for yourself!
Smh give her mom the dog back. 🙄
She just better not try n give the dog away again n expect to get it back
Defendants say the plaintiff neglected the dog but they were willing to sell HER dog back to her smh. I live in California and would avoid their church smh
The plaintiff's story changed so many times I lost count. He outburst at the end was confirmation that she shouldn't have a pet.
it's just a dog 😅 not a child
The judge being shocked about a pee fee shows how old this is lol
Both sides truly made me sick
The reason the defendant wanted to make the price so high to get the dog back was because they knew she couldn’t afford that. She very easily could’ve paid the $60. On the other hand, she shouldn’t have given away a dog that technically wasn’t hers.
The defendants lied for sure...these "religious" folks😒
The plaintiff got in that advertisement at the end though😂
They both liars!!!
The plantiffs victim mentality is outrageous!! She is probably more upset that things didn't go her way like a spoiled child!