Help Us Grow: Please "Like" this Video & Subscribe to our Channel (UA-cam, itunes & soundcloud). UA-camrs: click the "bell" in upper right corner to be notified of new episodes. SUPPORT: We are a new Channel with long-term ambition. If you like what you see and wish to help us continue -- and improve -- our show, you can support us in two ways: 1. Donate. 2. Share. 1. Donate. Those who are able to donate may do so here: www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#donate (PayPal, bank transfer, cheque). We truly are most grateful for your contribution. It means a lot. 2. Share. Not everyone can donate. The most valuable support is free -- we'd simply ask our supporters to remember to Share our videos with their social media networks. Thanks so much for watching, liking and commenting on our shows. We've been overwhelmed by the positive response we've received & want you to feel part of our Channel community. Your feedback is always welcome. Audio Subscription -- If you prefer Audio you can subscribe via itunes or Soundcloud. Thanks for watching! itunes: itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/so-what-youre-saying-is/id1454511530?mt=2 Soundcloud: soundcloud.com/user-923838732
8:20 It should be noted that the Heterodox Academy was formed by Jonathan Haidt, and that he is Left-wing, not a conservative. His issue is that the Left has become usurped by very close-minded, dogmatic people. This has brought independent-thinking Leftists like Jordan Peterson into closer association with conservatives as they have a common interest in genuine dialogue.
@@fellowcitizen Jordan Peterson is an amazing example of how I would like mankind to behave. He has immense knowledge, a huge heart and most of all, the balls to say exactly what he thinks. "Think and say" is what the criminal cabal are most afraid of us "chattle" slaves doing! BREXIT NOW YOU INCOMPETENT ARSEHOLES...
New Culture,: Peter Whittle, EX UKIP, MEP. The reason the BBC, Is so bias against anything other then Labour Is you have to remember that Labour ,Is because they (BBC) were given a wireless licence In 1949, so they could be supported by Labour and vice versa , as a thank you for the BBC helping them (Labour ) get elected, And the same In 1964,
Be ambitious but don't rely on the whims of UA-cam censors. Establish your channel on Bitchute at least. UA-cam will go the way of Cable TV, the future is decentralised.
I wonder how many today would congratulate the popes for understanding this shift and repeatedly warning about it one hundred years before the effects fully kicked in - not many would, that is my guess.
Spinler Muckflitt exactly what I do - Netflix and Prime too. Jacked in my license years ago and never looked back.....I’d suggest many more do the same.
@John Mac, just like acxez and many other, just prove you don't watch or download their 'product' and you don't pay. You then pay by watching adverts elsewhere, simples. And it's the same freedoms you have to do this as those that require a state broadcaster to be unbiased, however much people with their own bias, unconscious or not, pick fault with it.
If you want to stop paying for a TV license, then you have to no longer watch live TV and all other channels which use advertising. You can watch UA-cam, Netflix, amazon prime, but nothing ‘live’. You’d need to check with TV licensing to make sure you’re legal, and one of the comments on here is incorrectly implying that you can just stop using the BBC’s channels.
I'm old enough to remember when, as a Brit, I was proud - and, as a non-Brit, others were envious - of what USED TO BE the most trustworthy news source IN THE WORLD... the BBC. Now, as a Brit, I metaphorically hang my head in shame for - and, as non-Brits, others despise - the lies and machinations of that same institution for ranking amongst the LEAST trustworthy news sources in the world... the BBC. SHAME on you in charge!!! It is past time for the BBC's demise.
Being a working class man born in Stratford east London, I have experienced this immigration experiment which was so eloquently described in this interview, newham had policies in housing and schools where the white indigenous working class were basically left to their own devices, because in schools the priority was to teach the immigrants who by and large couldn’t speak English and therefore became a priority, I know this as my wife was school governor and teaching assistant in our daughters school and witnessed this, as for housing Stephen Timms who was at the time leader of newham council basically said that we needed more immigration into newham because we were basically all racists who lived there and this was a way of balancing this. We now live in Sussex because of this “positive discrimination”.
Tony Pammen I moved away from manor park. Could not handle living in an area where the council cater for only non white. Moved up north 10 years ago. And sad to say same is gapping here now
When I made the decision to vote for BREXIT I made it on life experience that I have gathered in the past 57 years of living in the real world. I have spent half in Africa and the UK. I brought up my son from 6 years old in 97 and he's now a chartered accountant and I have been a low income earner backed up with my wife on average 22 grand and between us we have just made it. We couldn't have done this in south Africa where they were becoming more communist. I have watched the quality of income in the UK decline in the middle England and seen the workers work getting farmed out of the country to the east. So primarily I voted for the patriotic feeling that the globalist in londonites have been selling their country that made them so comfortable down the river So hopefully my little stick /vote in beavers dam will keep the water /jobs and wealth in the country BE well
As they touched on the subject of ' rubbing the rights nose in diversity', since when did it become law that the majority of TV adverts should feature usually middle class mixed race couples? is this just a subliminal attempt by the powers that be to get us to accept more cultural diversity
keith douglas I often comment on exactly the same thing, I don’t care if they portray black families etc, but why mixed races almost all the time, I think you’re right
@@tonypammen3398--There's a presenter on BBC who almost ticks all the boxes(almost)he's a black disabled guy and a pretty decent presenter,he doesn't get TOP marks because he's male and hetero(I think)but every time I see him I automatically think 'this is the BBC PC diversity police at work'
#How's this for undisguised, natural BBC bias? A Question Time audience member (21.3.19) was loudly applauded for his contention that the UK should leave the EU without a deal - as originally planned - on 29th March 2019. When the applause died down, presenter, Fiona Bruce, felt it necessary to tell viewers that the volume of the applause was misleading because not that many people were actually clapping. Think about that!
yes, I noticed that, but when the next speaker gave his totally opposite view he only got a few claps (about 3 people) and Fiona Bruce never mentioned that.
Clifford Hatton So where was the extra noise coming from...bare arsed leavers Standing and Sitting down on plastic seats, whilst clapping? We'd better get the seats upholstered to stop them cheating & Misleading! Struth.. That Bruce woman really ascends my proboscis and my anal sphincter muscle.
I have to confess that I became increasingly emotional whilst listening to this (& I am not known as an emotional type of person). Why? Because for about the last 15-20 years or so, I've thought that I was in a minority of one w.r.t. the bias of the BBC, state institutions of schools, universities, local government, police & other media of TV, newspapers & magazines. I have honestly questioned whether I may have been losing the plot & going a tad bonkers. At last someone is actually saying what I've felt & believed for years! This is like a weight having been lifted from my shoulders. I strongly object to my being forced to subsidise left-wing, feminist, multicultural, pro-E.U. biased journalism via my BBC licence fee, (I think its going up from £147 pa soon). Why should I be forced to subsidise the UK thought police of the biased BBC, just so I can watch any / all of the other TV channels within the UK? Please explain. I am not a political animal at all, however I may well I may well purchase the book 'The Noble Liar', to better inform myself & claw-back my questioned sanity on this very important issue. Thank you for this video; I have up-ticked it & subscribed. Best regards to all, JohnnyK.
@@LeeRaldar I had to google "red pill, blue pill" to attempt to understand your reply - lol. I really don't think the exposure of the BBC's unrelenting bias's (ref. my original comment) is any shock to my system, as I've thought this for many, many years. I just appreciate that there some other well educated & well informed people out there that hold a similar view of the BBC & other state establishments & their respective quangos.. Just checked out your short guitar video (Time cover). Well done Lee. I've played guitar with vocals for 40-years+ on & off, so I appreciate your efforts. I've been considering whether I should also upload a few guitar playing videos & maybe also some of my kayak sailing ones. Regards JohnnyK.
@@johnkay4701 Hi John, by 'shock to the system' I think that I was referring more to that moment when you find that other people also 'get it' when you suggest there may be more to organisations like the BBC than appears at face value. There can't be too much user created music on You Tube, why not go for it.
@Chris Don, beware quoting computer games as ancient wisdom when its marketing department wants to sell you their stuff and block alternatives. Could you not find anything better from 1984, then?
It all starts at a worryingly young age. My wife teaches reception children and they have have told to take down ‘British values’ and replace it with ‘Global virtues’’. A little sinister?
There is an interesting YT video of Lord Pearson being invterviewed talking about cultural marxists, he said marxists said some thing like "get them young" ie schoolchildren. (I can't remember the exact words but you get my drift, I hope)
When I made the decision to vote for BREXIT I made it on life experience that I have gathered in the past 57 years of living in the real world. I have spent half in Africa and the UK. I brought up my son from 6 years old in 97 and he's now a chartered accountant and I have been a low income earner backed up with my wife on average 22 grand and between us we have just made it. We couldn't have done this in south Africa where they were becoming more communist. I have watched the quality of income in the UK decline in the middle England and seen the workers work getting farmed out of the country to the east. So primarily I voted for the patriotic feeling that the globalist in londonites have been selling their country that made them so comfortable down the river So hopefully my little stick /vote in beavers dam will keep the water /jobs and wealth in the country BE well
The BBC's attitude has not changed one iota since the very early days when they thought it was their duty to educate us and tell us what is good for us.
That may be true, but it used to be the case that what they thought was good for people and what ordinary people thought was good for people was pretty much the same, so it didn't matter so much.
I cancelled my DD for the licence fee a week or so before the Referendum. And wrote the BBC a letter telling them, in detail, why I had. I recommend others to do the same. I hadn’t watched TV for years, but used to listen to the radio. Since then R4, and other stations (for which you do not need to pay the licence fee to listen) have become so biased I just don’t bother listening anymore. When their income is choked off, they might start listening. If not, they'll just die a slow death...
This is a fascinating insight into how the BBC news works. It confirms the suspicion of lot of people clamouring for scraping of the compulsory licence, that the BBC is biased. The BBC news are not independent, it works rather like an activist platform with an ideology to which people in the BBC adhere. I am now going to buy the book.
Cheeseatingjunglista What was wrong with what OP wrote? Unless you're doing the sarcastic "I disagree therefore you don't understand what you're saying" bit -- in which case, don't bother replying.
@Bronia B, you miss the point that the BBC is funded by licence you don't have to pay if you can prove you don't casually watch it but will fall for the patter of admen selling a book that whinges about the principal. You and your non-discerning wallet are lucky the BBC is ad free. If it's worth reading, it'll be free in a library or 50p in a charity shop one week after vanity-publication.
@@sirsydneycamm1883 to watch tv you haveto pay a license , does the bbc pay these other channels money from that license ?, bbc does not give people the choice of having a tv without the bbc , the only bbc i watch is bbc 4 when they have some good progs on , the bbc is not what it was and i object to paying 2 million to chat show and sport pundits , bbc pays radio hosts high salaries that commercial stations cannot afford but the bbc can only afford it by forcing the people to pay an over the top license , Parkinson must be reeling knowing what Norton is on compared to what he got , all for the ratings and what does it matter when bbc don't advertise which is what the need to pull in viewers to see adverts is all about , and whats with changing a radio station to make it more diverse ? people listen to it because its what they like now someones telling them to listen to something else , i choose what music i listen to not the bbc
This is a recent phenomena. I remember back in the 80s when the Guardian was a serious paper and you could look at the BBC without throwing something at the TV...those were the days!
@@hejla4524 spot on! I play a game. I turn on BBC radio 5 live at random points in the afternoon and count how many minutes it takes for them to start banging on identity politics or classic Guardian SJW talking points. My best was 6 seconds. Then I listened longer and I realised it was every day all the time. Give it a try its comical it is literally The Guardian in Radio form. It's no wonder the ratings have tanked.
@@marccas10 we play a game of how long it takes the BBC to slate trump after turning the TV on. We've had 1 second at the lowest, couple of minutes at the highest.
Great video. Sums up why I no longer watch the BBC. I have my own opinion, I do not care for that of the BBC. RT and the internet give me raw news. I make my own opinions.
So you think RT gives you the unbiased truth ? Christ ! even the Russians(a highly educated people) laugh at the content of the PPC(Putin Propaganda Corporation)
its more likely you've succumbed to confirmation bias. while not perfect, the bbc certainly gives a more balanced view than RT, unless you're drunk on donnyade
I disagree with the assertion that the BBC's attitude is 'well-meaning'. Their agenda against traditional British values and general conservatism appears to me to be largely fuelled by anger, spite and arrogance.
I think the problem is much greater than the “noble lie”. It’s too complicated to go into here but one simple question. Why does no one question halal meat production? Britain prides itself on protecting animals. Farmers have to abide by some of the strictest animal welfare rules in the world. Fox hunting with dogs is banned, even though the fox is likely to die a horrible death anyway. Yet we allow animals to be slaughtered as demanded by sharia law. Which means the normal stunning before death procedures are modified or bypassed. So now all meat provided by government institutions, hospitals, schools, prisons etc is halal. Why do the beliefs of a recently arrived minority who don’t share our values, outweigh the values of the indigenous people? And why is it never mentioned?
If there was a case for less Islam it is this halal thing alone. As an Aussie I detest the live cattle and sheep trade which takes these poor creatures on a hell journey to a horrible death in Islamic countries.
Those wedded to identity politics have a hierarchy of victimhood and muslims and ethnic minorities are at the top. That is why they are willing to sacrifice the wellbeing of gay people and women to those groups. In the cases like Rotherham it is why they were so reluctant to report on the rape gangs - Pakistani muslims rate higher than white women even if they are male. So much for attacking the evil patriarchy! . On the other hand if a white man does anything they go to town on him. Also look at the differing reactions to Christchurch and Sri Lanka. Before much was actually known about the attacks a muslim Guardian writer was trying to blame extremist Bhuddists! I'm sorry mate animals are way down the list. Their welfare is only an issue if a lower group such as white men is harming them.
My daughter did a thesis on Halal meat production (specifically - cruelty to animals, measuring the point of brain death after killing the aninal) but had to have 2 layers of security to protect her identity. Absolutely unbelievable in a western country- are we now the third world??
My analogy for immigration is like making mayonnaise: You have the egg yolk and then mix in the oil drop by drop. If you pour too much oil in too quickly, the whole thing curdles. Very interesting conversation. Thanks.
Once you have made mayonnaise, eventually, you need to stop adding the oil... ...it reaches a point of no return, and all texture turns to oiliness, and you need to start again. Your once perfect mayonnaise becomes part of a fatberg in the sewers.
Switch off your TV, start watching You Tube channels such as this excellent one and legally cancel your TV Licence as I have. You only need a licence if you watch live tv or use BBC iPlayer NOT for UA-cam, Netflix, or the itv player etc... do your research .. Subscribed
Bitcoin Rat - in socialist countries "people's educators" used to descend on the "uneducated" masses to bring them the good news of communism. This is exactly what is happening now - the Marxist-liberal elite is hellbent on re-educating the dissenters.
@@greyandblue4323 - if course it is not fair. Fairness has got nothing to do with it in their minds - it is about molding your mind because uniformity is the goal. Uniform thinking, uniform seeing, uniform acting. You see, fairness is not on that agenda....
@@kbeetles Yes I was being ironic in using the word 'fair' and you are correct...I believe the majority of employees at the BBC are common purpose graduates, so.....
I'm a liberal. And proud of it. But the whole Brexit thing has pretty much hit home the importance of an unbiased media. Because it may be fine when everything is going your way. But when it isn't, when you disagree, you realise there is no one speaking for you. I voted for Brexit.
I may be being presumptuous, however where were you, indeed where are you, when it comes to protecting the human rights, of Tommy Robinson. What goes around, comes around, Just asking?
BBC played by the book did they like interviewing on 3 occasions typical Ex Londoners aged about 80 living in Essex with tattoos like they represented all Brexiteers
...oldest journalistic trick in the book: interview a few tattooed, inarticulate rough diamonds then turn to the camera and say "So! There you have the view from Anytown".
I was interviewed in the street years ago by tv. asked about violence I said in USA they had smashing rooms to let out your feelings; this was edited and i said i like smashing rooms eh
Interesting that these experts reinforce and confirm what we are all thinking at home but thought it was just us. (Unless you're a patronising liberal lefty, of course.)
It has been this imbalance in the whole mainstream media, especially the BBC, coverage of the cultural life of this country. This journalist articulates beautifully what many of have felt but have found it difficult to put into the coherent language that is needed as you say. We do need seriously to have more of this in the mainstream to balance out the debate and put an end to or at least challenge all the PC bullshit being forced on us.
Yes, all the usual propaganda ploys. "Despite" brexit as a prefix on just about everything but the weather. Remainers "State", but leavers only "Claim". etc. I have virtually stopped watching it.
For the two years between the UK's vote to leave the EU and its (supposed) enactment, BBC Breakfast daily treated the viewing population to a distressing 'health scare' story; every morning, a depressing and VERY DEMORALIZING story. I believe it was an exercise in getting the public to accept the fait accomplis of having their vote overturned.
Ha ha, it won’t stop. But “they” may knock on your door one day and give you a fine? I don’t know, but I would like to vote for somebody like UKIP. Wouldn’t they stop the forced BBC license fees?
@@Pippie5555 im pretty sure they have no right to come in unless they see that your watching live TV. or you tell them that you do. i dont even watch the TV anymore.
Yugoslavia, Northern Ireland, Rwanda, Israel, The Sudan, Sri Lanka and Iraq are multicultural countries. Evidently, multicultural countries are extremely prone of inter ethnic / inter religious conflicts. Yet no academic, journalist or politician has pointed this simple truth out.
Maori have taken to the streets many times to express their grievances at the loss of their tribal lands to settlers. I don't think the Maori are huge fans of multiculturalism somehow. And lets not forget the Christchurch shootings, two examples of ethnic tensions, one of which was murderous. Oops!
It is sad that they (out of benign concern) think "you need the BBC" you don't need it. It is a second death. A minute lost forever at a glowing screen. Go for walks. Love your family. Refuse to watch the BBC and their undignified "gifts"
You are not going to get it free for much longer as the BBC are to put a stop to it, after all, the money to pay all those obscene fees to presenters and salaries to the managers has to come from somewhere.
@@brianrodney712 am I the only person that thinks that is a good thing? Just because you're retired "they" want you in front of "the screen" as much as possible.. its like they want to anesthetise them.. like in one flew over the cuckoo's nest
Very interesting discussion. Who do these people at the BBC think they are? Who gave them the authority to decide what is in the best interests of the people? And surely they can't be so deaf, dumb and blind as to believe that, in today's social media world, their distortions remain undetected? What a great shame that a one-time noble institution is now seen as a propaganda outfit by so many. - and not just by those in the UK, I'm afraid.
The BBC do not have the ability to think in the abstract, so unable to comprehend that the EU membership for people outside London, BBC and Parliament is not a force for good.
We hear the same from Canada re the CBC. Not a surprise given that ABC & CBC are both modelled on the CBC -- although , in the case of the CBC, it is part-funded by commercials and receives rest of funding directly from government rather than via licence fee. It was anti-CBC sentiment that led to creation of Rebel Media, which is now a significant force in the Anglosphere.
Years ago, when I was growing up, we had ,The Archers’ a story of country folk. The people were characterised as good people. They would help each other, and worry about each other. This was sent around the world and gave a positive view of us. Then the BBC presented Albert Square, where people cheat, steal, are unfaithful to their partners, causing heart ache and unhappiness all the time. This is now the types of people that we think are normal, even though we are surrounded by people who are really trying to make other people’s lives better. This critical cynical view of normal people is so wrong. What can we do about being displayed much worse than we are, when others nations show themselves as heroes.
There is nothing noble about it. The sooner people realise that the better.
5 років тому+6
The BBC has enormous influence via patronage. A leftwing university professor, journalist or comedian can expect repeated invitations to appear on panel shows, or to narrate documentaries or present a TV series. In this way the BBC funds left wing figures, pays their salaries. They can acquire an entire career via BBC patronage. A person whose views are contrary to the BBC's narrative won't be invited to the BBC. The Guardian newspaper has annual losses in eight £ figures. The BBC places virtually all of its advertising for jobs in the media section of The Guardian, thereby funding the leftwing newspaper. Repeatedly inviting Guardian journalists to appear on the BBC is a means of padding their salaries.
jasbinder singh the mass influx of lower IQ students in the late 90s onwards did not question the indoctrination and relished the opportunity to be a ‘champion’ for social justice causes and perceived as fashionably politically correct. Naivety and narcissism.
This going to university madness must end. I laugh at most graduates nowadays. Graduates with degrees, but no knowledge. Graduates who are English, and their parents and grandparents are white English, and they cannot draft a simple letter in English. It is truly shocking. They are doing degrees in "music technology", degree in "outdoor studies". It is truly shocking. What we need is proper degrees in Science, Sociology, History, Literature etc etc, and good and credible pathways to solid vocational studies. Vocational route seems to have been totally abandoned, and everyone seems to be interested in doing these useless degrees.
I'm fed up to the back teeth with diversity. English is an ethnicity (look it up). By rights England should be at least 95% ethnic English. It's currently around the 75% mark. London is below 50% and Birmingham is not far behind. The madness began in 1948 but got a whole lot worse thanks to Blair. Subsequent Tory governments failed to stop the rot, to their immense shame.
Excellent, loved the bit when they both burst out laughing at the thought of French pride. When they spoke about the uniformity of news channels I had to disagree slightly,as Sky News Australia is infinately better than it's British counterpart.
Really interesting conversation that just helped to confirm my personal view of the BBC and the so called MSM. So disappointed Peter left UKIP. If you were unhappy with Gerard's leadership (I personally think he's courageous and providing excellent leadership), there is going to be a leadership election very soon. We need people with your obvious intelligence and commitment. We don't all have to agree on everything. But all the best for your project.
The title BBC has an air of authority, truth being unbiased. We grew up with it the trusted, comforting, eloquent voices. But now we know to look under the rock to see the truth. NEVER be scared to shine light on darkness. 😊
The BBC; "The UK will run out of water in 25 years time as demand outstrips supply. The reasons for this are climate change and population growth." Can you guess which solution the BBC didn't suggest? You guessed it! They never said anything about reducing immigration.
Mike yes absolutely. Except no tv license in Australia. Sadly I was a mad ABC fan and used to go into the second lounge and watch while my parents were on commercial tv. I was crazy about the BBC dramas shown by the ABC and when I came back to the uk I was still convinced that the BBC was brilliant. I now refuse to pay the license fee but as I never watch live to air television I don’t need it. I get all my news from reliable sources on you tube who with no or very limited budgets manage to outshine the 4 billion pounds worth of shit spewing out of the BBC. The on camera wankers think of themselves as stars not reporters. With the salary’s they get is it any wonder. £200,000 up to two million pounds a year. Ridiculous.
On Friday, the BBC news app carried a piece informing me that the MoD have an emergency bunker and 3500 troops ready to mobilise in the event of a no-deal Brexit. They've long ago moved beyond mere partisanship and into the realm of hysterical lunacy.
Thank goodness there are people like Robin Aitken who are willing to speak out about things that are generally hushed up and pushed under the carpet. Excellent interview, thank you very much.
AT LAST...someone who can offer a cogent and informative perspective. And thank you to "So what you saying..." for objective discussion (let's hope thought police don't try ban you)
Just finished my OU degree at 42 and I know exactly what you mean I even think some tutors down marked me for my anti left views which are not extreme just healthily sceptical
Writing this in January 2020. The tide is indeed turning. Let's hope this is the year we say goodbye BBC. Thank you Peter and all your excellent guests for your endeavours in rolling the stone away.
BBC - a duty to inform? A TV programme we should have expected from them about Brexit, before the referendum, but never materialised, would have been a courtroom-style inquiry which would have had arguments from both sides stating their case, and each being fairly cross-examined, point by point, and covering several hours and days. The aspects covered, for example: legal issues, trade, immigration (pros and cons), economy, finance,...etc. Instead, we got the usual tabloid-style, confrontational format which, curiously, always ran out of time before getting anywhere.
As a hobby I study people's body language and persona ,these are genuine believable souls ,take notice and inwardly digest what they share with you ,regards Sebastian ghy
So glad I found this channel. It is difficult to hold onto your own ideas, integrity and beliefs when all around you are singing from a different hymn sheet. Listening to people discussing what is actually going on is a relief, which is why Soros and the radicals want to shut down social media. Social media is the modern equivalent of the revolution of the printing press.
My son went for an audition for an advert for Sainsbury's in Manchester. Whether he got it or not, I did not care less. But what amused me was the advert sent to he agents. It said, and I paraphrase, "We do not welcome candidates with a Merseyside accent." As a scouser, I did find this stereotyping rather interesting. No, you have guessed it, my son did not get the gig. Why? He was not the right colour. They wanted a Black man with a white wife and a whiter-shade-of-pale son would not have cut the mustard. Either that or it would have produced a very angry (non-Sainsburys shopper) father. So, the result was a half-chat family. Father black, mother white (the only way adverts accept the arrangement). Fine by me, but not so fine by the people of Liverpool when they found out about the agency advert.
Great interview. It highlights views about the BBC that I have held for the past 20 years. They have their agenda embedded in every program whether it is news or drama. It's everywhere
I'm reading Robin's book, The Noble Liar, at the moment, and it's very, very good. It's an in-depth sociological look at the BBC and Britain of the last 60 years. Highly recommended.
One reason why i stopped paying for the tv licence and stopped watching television. Also the constant multi ethnic brainwashing on commercials and tv shows.
Early on I bemoaned the fact that this excellent new show had so few views. Coming back to it now I’m encouraged that it has nearly 100k views. That said, after rewatching the interview I can’t help wishing it had even more exposure.
Thank you, David. Yes, our very first episode remains v popular and shall soon pass 100k views. Our show as a whole is about to cross the 1 million view mark after only 5 months. We're delighted.
Help Us Grow: Please "Like" this Video & Subscribe to our Channel (UA-cam, itunes & soundcloud). UA-camrs: click the "bell" in upper right corner to be notified of new episodes.
SUPPORT: We are a new Channel with long-term ambition. If you like what you see and wish to help us continue -- and improve -- our show, you can support us in two ways: 1. Donate. 2. Share.
1. Donate. Those who are able to donate may do so here: www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#donate (PayPal, bank transfer, cheque). We truly are most grateful for your contribution. It means a lot.
2. Share. Not everyone can donate. The most valuable support is free -- we'd simply ask our supporters to remember to Share our videos with their social media networks.
Thanks so much for watching, liking and commenting on our shows. We've been overwhelmed by the positive response we've received & want you to feel part of our Channel community. Your feedback is always welcome.
Audio Subscription -- If you prefer Audio you can subscribe via itunes or Soundcloud. Thanks for watching!
itunes: itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/so-what-youre-saying-is/id1454511530?mt=2 Soundcloud: soundcloud.com/user-923838732
8:20 It should be noted that the Heterodox Academy was formed by Jonathan Haidt, and that he is Left-wing, not a conservative. His issue is that the Left has become usurped by very close-minded, dogmatic people. This has brought independent-thinking Leftists like Jordan Peterson into closer association with conservatives as they have a common interest in genuine dialogue.
@@fellowcitizen Jordan Peterson is an amazing example of how I would like mankind to behave. He has immense knowledge, a huge heart and most of all, the balls to say exactly what he thinks. "Think and say" is what the criminal cabal are most afraid of us "chattle" slaves doing! BREXIT NOW YOU INCOMPETENT ARSEHOLES...
New Culture,:
Peter Whittle, EX UKIP, MEP. The reason the BBC, Is so bias against anything other then Labour Is you have to remember that Labour ,Is because they (BBC) were given a wireless licence In 1949, so they could be supported by Labour and vice versa , as a thank you for the BBC helping them (Labour ) get elected, And the same In 1964,
Please make bitchute account too, youtube will probably censor you sooner or later.
Be ambitious but don't rely on the whims of UA-cam censors. Establish your channel on Bitchute at least. UA-cam will go the way of Cable TV, the future is decentralised.
The word "liberal" has undergone a perverse change in meaning from "open and free" to "restricted and controlled".
Yes, and progressive is regressive.
The weoponisation of words is rife.
Doublespeak. Almost word for word as Orwell described it.
I wonder how many today would congratulate the popes for understanding this shift and repeatedly warning about it one hundred years before the effects fully kicked in - not many would, that is my guess.
@@johnmac8084 Hitter thought that.
Thanks for this. It's bad enough the BBC operates like this, but to have to pay for it, under pain of a criminal record!
@AUNice….but its better to collect them all up and take action under the harassment laws :@)
Spinler Muckflitt exactly what I do - Netflix and Prime too. Jacked in my license years ago and never looked back.....I’d suggest many more do the same.
@John Mac, just like acxez and many other, just prove you don't watch or download their 'product' and you don't pay. You then pay by watching adverts elsewhere, simples. And it's the same freedoms you have to do this as those that require a state broadcaster to be unbiased, however much people with their own bias, unconscious or not, pick fault with it.
stop.
If you want to stop paying for a TV license, then you have to no longer watch live TV and all other channels which use advertising.
You can watch UA-cam, Netflix, amazon prime, but nothing ‘live’.
You’d need to check with TV licensing to make sure you’re legal, and one of the comments on here is incorrectly implying that you can just stop using the BBC’s channels.
I'm old enough to remember when, as a Brit, I was proud - and, as a non-Brit, others were envious - of what USED TO BE the most trustworthy news source IN THE WORLD... the BBC.
Now, as a Brit, I metaphorically hang my head in shame for - and, as non-Brits, others despise - the lies and machinations of that same institution for ranking amongst the LEAST trustworthy news sources in the world... the BBC.
SHAME on you in charge!!! It is past time for the BBC's demise.
Being a working class man born in Stratford east London, I have experienced this immigration experiment which was so eloquently described in this interview, newham had policies in housing and schools where the white indigenous working class were basically left to their own devices, because in schools the priority was to teach the immigrants who by and large couldn’t speak English and therefore became a priority, I know this as my wife was school governor and teaching assistant in our daughters school and witnessed this, as for housing Stephen Timms who was at the time leader of newham council basically said that we needed more immigration into newham because we were basically all racists who lived there and this was a way of balancing this. We now live in Sussex because of this “positive discrimination”.
Tony Pammen I moved away from manor park. Could not handle living in an area where the council cater for only non white. Moved up north 10 years ago. And sad to say same is gapping here now
When I made the decision to vote for BREXIT I made it on life experience that I have gathered in the past 57 years of living in the real world. I have spent half in Africa and the UK.
I brought up my son from 6 years old in 97 and he's now a chartered accountant and I have been a low income earner backed up with my wife on average 22 grand and between us we have just made it. We couldn't have done this in south Africa where they were becoming more communist. I have watched the quality of income in the UK decline in the middle England and seen the workers work getting farmed out of the country to the east. So primarily I voted for the patriotic feeling that the globalist in londonites have been selling their country that made them so comfortable down the river
So hopefully my little stick /vote in beavers dam will keep the water /jobs and wealth in the country
BE well
As they touched on the subject of ' rubbing the rights nose in diversity', since when did it become law that the majority of TV adverts should feature usually middle class mixed race couples? is this just a subliminal attempt by the powers that be to get us to accept more cultural diversity
keith douglas I often comment on exactly the same thing, I don’t care if they portray black families etc, but why mixed races almost all the time, I think you’re right
@@tonypammen3398--There's a presenter on BBC who almost ticks all the boxes(almost)he's a black disabled guy and a pretty decent presenter,he doesn't get TOP marks because he's male and hetero(I think)but every time I see him I automatically think 'this is the BBC PC diversity police at work'
#How's this for undisguised, natural BBC bias? A Question Time audience member (21.3.19) was loudly applauded for his contention that the UK should leave the EU without a deal - as originally planned - on 29th March 2019. When the applause died down, presenter, Fiona Bruce, felt it necessary to tell viewers that the volume of the applause was misleading because not that many people were actually clapping. Think about that!
yes, I noticed that, but when the next speaker gave his totally opposite view he only got a few claps (about 3 people) and Fiona Bruce never mentioned that.
Clifford Hatton
So where was the extra noise coming from...bare arsed leavers Standing and Sitting down on plastic seats, whilst clapping?
We'd better get the seats upholstered to stop them cheating & Misleading!
Struth.. That Bruce woman really ascends my proboscis and my anal sphincter muscle.
Laughable. When you can see what's going on, it become so obvious all the time. It can't stomach watching the ministry of truth anymore.
I won't watch it either apart from a bit of sport now and then, that is it.
@@davidwaddington9414 Yep I did notice that ! - it wasn't the first time either she had done it the week before !
I have to confess that I became increasingly emotional whilst listening to this (& I am not known as an emotional type of person). Why? Because for about the last 15-20 years or so, I've thought that I was in a minority of one w.r.t. the bias of the BBC, state institutions of schools, universities, local government, police & other media of TV, newspapers & magazines. I have honestly questioned whether I may have been losing the plot & going a tad bonkers.
At last someone is actually saying what I've felt & believed for years! This is like a weight having been lifted from my shoulders.
I strongly object to my being forced to subsidise left-wing, feminist, multicultural, pro-E.U. biased journalism via my BBC licence fee, (I think its going up from £147 pa soon). Why should I be forced to subsidise the UK thought police of the biased BBC, just so I can watch any / all of the other TV channels within the UK? Please explain.
I am not a political animal at all, however I may well I may well purchase the book 'The Noble Liar', to better inform myself & claw-back my questioned sanity on this very important issue.
Thank you for this video; I have up-ticked it & subscribed. Best regards to all, JohnnyK.
Congratulations ami, you are on your way now.
nope you've definitely lost the plot and appear to be burying your head deeper in consumption of bullshit.
The red pill is initially a shock to the system, eventually you will come to realise that the whole system is run by clowns for clowns.
@@LeeRaldar I had to google "red pill, blue pill" to attempt to understand your reply - lol. I really don't think the exposure of the BBC's unrelenting bias's (ref. my original comment) is any shock to my system, as I've thought this for many, many years. I just appreciate that there some other well educated & well informed people out there that hold a similar view of the BBC & other state establishments & their respective quangos..
Just checked out your short guitar video (Time cover). Well done Lee. I've played guitar with vocals for 40-years+ on & off, so I appreciate your efforts. I've been considering whether I should also upload a few guitar playing videos & maybe also some of my kayak sailing ones. Regards JohnnyK.
@@johnkay4701 Hi John, by 'shock to the system' I think that I was referring more to that moment when you find that other people also 'get it' when you suggest there may be more to organisations like the BBC than appears at face value.
There can't be too much user created music on You Tube, why not go for it.
"Beware of he who would control your access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
So well stated. Thank you. It will be passed on.
Excellent quote
"workers could be liberated from this experience by seizing the means of production". Karl Marx Das Capital.
@Chris Don, beware quoting computer games as ancient wisdom when its marketing department wants to sell you their stuff and block alternatives. Could you not find anything better from 1984, then?
Perfectly encapsulated👍🏻
It all starts at a worryingly young age. My wife teaches reception children and they have have told to take down ‘British values’ and replace it with ‘Global virtues’’. A little sinister?
the official line is still British values as Ofsted inspect for this - you must have a council or headteacher who thinks they know better.
There is an interesting YT video of Lord Pearson being invterviewed talking about cultural marxists, he said marxists said some thing like "get them young" ie schoolchildren. (I can't remember the exact words but you get my drift, I hope)
When I made the decision to vote for BREXIT I made it on life experience that I have gathered in the past 57 years of living in the real world. I have spent half in Africa and the UK.
I brought up my son from 6 years old in 97 and he's now a chartered accountant and I have been a low income earner backed up with my wife on average 22 grand and between us we have just made it. We couldn't have done this in south Africa where they were becoming more communist. I have watched the quality of income in the UK decline in the middle England and seen the workers work getting farmed out of the country to the east. So primarily I voted for the patriotic feeling that the globalist in londonites have been selling their country that made them so comfortable down the river
So hopefully my little stick /vote in beavers dam will keep the water /jobs and wealth in the country
BE well
Alex Clarke extremely dangerous.
i see it at school as well. Very scary. School, university, social media, TV, radio, newspapers = brain washing
The bbc ''Where truth and integrity go to die''
This suggests that truth and integrity might even get a foot in the door...
l agree L KS.. Their are indeed a ''gutter broadcaster'' their days, this neo-marxist nonsence, are hopefully numbered....
BBC bias = length & girth bias. Don't hate the player hate the game.
where truth and integrity get killed (imho)
The BBC's attitude has not changed one iota since the very early days when they thought it was their duty to educate us and tell us what is good for us.
BBC bias = length & girth bias. Don't hate the player hate the game.
That may be true, but it used to be the case that what they thought was good for people and what ordinary people thought was good for people was pretty much the same, so it didn't matter so much.
This is a quality piece of work.Enjoyed it.
I cancelled my DD for the licence fee a week or so before the Referendum. And wrote the BBC a letter telling them, in detail, why I had.
I recommend others to do the same. I hadn’t watched TV for years, but used to listen to the radio. Since then R4, and other stations (for which you do not need to pay the licence fee to listen) have become so biased I just don’t bother listening anymore.
When their income is choked off, they might start listening. If not, they'll just die a slow death...
I have done the same . Down with the BBC.
This is a fascinating insight into how the BBC news works. It confirms the suspicion of lot of people clamouring for scraping of the compulsory licence, that the BBC is biased. The BBC news are not independent, it works rather like an activist platform with an ideology to which people in the BBC adhere.
I am now going to buy the book.
Cheeseatingjunglista What was wrong with what OP wrote? Unless you're doing the sarcastic "I disagree therefore you don't understand what you're saying" bit -- in which case, don't bother replying.
@Bronia B, you miss the point that the BBC is funded by licence you don't have to pay if you can prove you don't casually watch it but will fall for the patter of admen selling a book that whinges about the principal. You and your non-discerning wallet are lucky the BBC is ad free. If it's worth reading, it'll be free in a library or 50p in a charity shop one week after vanity-publication.
@@sirsydneycamm1883 to watch tv you haveto pay a license , does the bbc pay these other channels money from that license ?, bbc does not give people the choice of having a tv without the bbc , the only bbc i watch is bbc 4 when they have some good progs on , the bbc is not what it was and i object to paying 2 million to chat show and sport pundits , bbc pays radio hosts high salaries that commercial stations cannot afford but the bbc can only afford it by forcing the people to pay an over the top license , Parkinson must be reeling knowing what Norton is on compared to what he got , all for the ratings and what does it matter when bbc don't advertise which is what the need to pull in viewers to see adverts is all about , and whats with changing a radio station to make it more diverse ? people listen to it because its what they like now someones telling them to listen to something else , i choose what music i listen to not the bbc
Go and take a look at the BBC website below the headlines. Its basically The Guardian.
This is a recent phenomena. I remember back in the 80s when the Guardian was a serious paper and you could look at the BBC without throwing something at the TV...those were the days!
@@hejla4524 spot on! I play a game. I turn on BBC radio 5 live at random points in the afternoon and count how many minutes it takes for them to start banging on identity politics or classic Guardian SJW talking points. My best was 6 seconds. Then I listened longer and I realised it was every day all the time. Give it a try its comical it is literally The Guardian in Radio form. It's no wonder the ratings have tanked.
@@marccas10 You are a brave man. Listening to that stuff is like being stuck in a conversation with someone you really can't stand. Torture.
@@marccas10 we play a game of how long it takes the BBC to slate trump after turning the TV on. We've had 1 second at the lowest, couple of minutes at the highest.
@@angelvids6024 They also like to call him Mr Trump instead of "President Trump" purely by accident I am sure? 🙄
Great video. Sums up why I no longer watch the BBC. I have my own opinion, I do not care for that of the BBC. RT and the internet give me raw news. I make my own opinions.
So you think RT gives you the unbiased truth ? Christ ! even the Russians(a highly educated people) laugh at the content of the PPC(Putin Propaganda Corporation)
its more likely you've succumbed to confirmation bias. while not perfect, the bbc certainly gives a more balanced view than RT, unless you're drunk on donnyade
At least RT gives a broader variety of news and perspective. A refreshing news channel, with some humour in it.
"RT and the internet give me raw news" . So a Russian state sponsored "News" channel and an abstract concept form your opinions .........interesting.
The fact that you trust rt more than the BBC says it all.
EXCUSE ME!!! What gives the BBC the right to decide what is right for the people or the individual. They have no right to lead.
I disagree with the assertion that the BBC's attitude is 'well-meaning'. Their agenda against traditional British values and general conservatism appears to me to be largely fuelled by anger, spite and arrogance.
@Spinler Muckflitt yes, and Fabian school, LSE, former Trotskyists, Marxists and the rest of those wankers
I think the problem is much greater than the “noble lie”.
It’s too complicated to go into here but one simple question. Why does no one question halal meat production?
Britain prides itself on protecting animals. Farmers have to abide by some of the strictest animal welfare rules in the world. Fox hunting with dogs is banned, even though the fox is likely to die a horrible death anyway. Yet we allow animals to be slaughtered as demanded by sharia law. Which means the normal stunning before death procedures are modified or bypassed. So now all meat provided by government institutions, hospitals, schools, prisons etc is halal.
Why do the beliefs of a recently arrived minority who don’t share our values, outweigh the values of the indigenous people?
And why is it never mentioned?
We share your frustration and puzzlement, Old man...
If there was a case for less Islam it is this halal thing alone.
As an Aussie I detest the live cattle and sheep trade which takes these poor creatures on a hell journey to a horrible death in Islamic countries.
Denise G- Hill. Yes it is, but Jewish people don’t force kosher food on the rest of us.
Those wedded to identity politics have a hierarchy of victimhood and muslims and ethnic minorities are at the top. That is why they are willing to sacrifice the wellbeing of gay people and women to those groups. In the cases like Rotherham it is why they were so reluctant to report on the rape gangs - Pakistani muslims rate higher than white women even if they are male. So much for attacking the evil patriarchy! . On the other hand if a white man does anything they go to town on him. Also look at the differing reactions to Christchurch and Sri Lanka. Before much was actually known about the attacks a muslim Guardian writer was trying to blame extremist Bhuddists! I'm sorry mate animals are way down the list. Their welfare is only an issue if a lower group such as white men is harming them.
My daughter did a thesis on Halal meat production (specifically - cruelty to animals, measuring the point of brain death after killing the aninal) but had to have 2 layers of security to protect her identity. Absolutely unbelievable in a western country- are we now the third world??
My analogy for immigration is like making mayonnaise: You have the egg yolk and then mix in the oil drop by drop. If you pour too much oil in too quickly, the whole thing curdles. Very interesting conversation. Thanks.
Nice analogy
What about . a omelette
Once you have made mayonnaise, eventually, you need to stop adding the oil... ...it reaches a point of no return, and all texture turns to oiliness, and you need to start again. Your once perfect mayonnaise becomes part of a fatberg in the sewers.
Switch off your TV, start watching You Tube channels such as this excellent one and legally cancel your TV Licence as I have.
You only need a licence if you watch live tv or use BBC iPlayer NOT for UA-cam, Netflix, or the itv player etc... do your research ..
Subscribed
Or if you want to pay it, no one needs a TV licence, I’ve not paid in 12 years now
"The BBC tells a series of well-meaning untruths which it believes are in our best interests" YEP !
Bitcoin Rat - in socialist countries "people's educators" used to descend on the "uneducated" masses to bring them the good news of communism. This is exactly what is happening now - the Marxist-liberal elite is hellbent on re-educating the dissenters.
And are only able to do this by continuing to collect the TV tax, of which, failure to pay can see you in jail. Doesn't sound quite fair somehow !
@@greyandblue4323 - if course it is not fair. Fairness has got nothing to do with it in their minds - it is about molding your mind because uniformity is the goal. Uniform thinking, uniform seeing, uniform acting. You see, fairness is not on that agenda....
Well-meaning???????::?
@@kbeetles Yes I was being ironic in using the word 'fair' and you are correct...I believe the majority of employees at the BBC are common purpose graduates, so.....
Scrap the license fee.Put up in court for not paying a lefty membership
Just don't watch or pay for it, easy
it is not a lefty membership was a load rubbish
I'm a liberal. And proud of it. But the whole Brexit thing has pretty much hit home the importance of an unbiased media. Because it may be fine when everything is going your way. But when it isn't, when you disagree, you realise there is no one speaking for you. I voted for Brexit.
Awesome Avenger.
Exactly.
"This democracy lark is OK except when I don't get what I want!'
@@MauriatOttolink : This democracy lark is OK except when the majority ride roughshod over the minority.
I may be being presumptuous, however where were you, indeed where are you, when it comes to protecting the human rights, of Tommy Robinson. What goes around, comes around, Just asking?
I see you are learning.
@@stuartcrossland1746 Difference is, you get your 'news' from the kremlin and are stupid enough to believe it. Because you're a flat earther.
BBC played by the book did they like interviewing on 3 occasions typical Ex Londoners aged about 80 living in Essex with tattoos like they represented all Brexiteers
...oldest journalistic trick in the book: interview a few tattooed, inarticulate rough diamonds then turn to the camera and say "So! There you have the view from Anytown".
I was interviewed in the street years ago by tv. asked about violence I said in USA they had smashing rooms to let out your feelings; this was edited and i said i like smashing rooms eh
This is good stuff from good honest men.
@Phil Weatherley Twat.
Brexit has proved beyond doubt a cultural change needs to come
I think it is now coming.
This is excellent. Thank you
100% truth spoken by Mr Aitken...a true journalist.
Interesting that these experts reinforce and confirm what we are all thinking at home but thought it was just us. (Unless you're a patronising liberal lefty, of course.)
It has been this imbalance in the whole mainstream media, especially the BBC, coverage of the cultural life of this country. This journalist articulates beautifully what many of have felt but have found it difficult to put into the coherent language that is needed as you say. We do need seriously to have more of this in the mainstream to balance out the debate and put an end to or at least challenge all the PC bullshit being forced on us.
Yes, all the usual propaganda ploys. "Despite" brexit as a prefix on just about everything but the weather.
Remainers "State", but leavers only "Claim". etc. I have virtually stopped watching it.
BBC breakfast news is Blue Peter for the over 30s.
For the two years between the UK's vote to leave the EU and its (supposed) enactment, BBC Breakfast daily treated the viewing population to a distressing 'health scare' story; every morning, a depressing and VERY DEMORALIZING story. I believe it was an exercise in getting the public to accept the fait accomplis of having their vote overturned.
Stopped my bbc licence months ago. Still waiting for the tv to stop working🤷🏻♂️
Ha ha, it won’t stop. But “they” may knock on your door one day and give you a fine? I don’t know, but I would like to vote for somebody like UKIP. Wouldn’t they stop the forced BBC license fees?
@@Pippie5555 yes they have said they will stop the fee. i had one knock on my door. i shut the door on them lol
Waow well done! You have the guts!
@@Pippie5555 im pretty sure they have no right to come in unless they see that your watching live TV. or you tell them that you do. i dont even watch the TV anymore.
I would do the same, but I moved out of Europe 10 years ago...
Interesting and thoughtful talk.
Extremely interesting and a resounding Here here from 35
Interesting, not particularly thoughtful.
Yugoslavia, Northern Ireland, Rwanda, Israel, The Sudan, Sri Lanka and Iraq are multicultural countries. Evidently, multicultural countries are extremely prone of inter ethnic / inter religious conflicts. Yet no academic, journalist or politician has pointed this simple truth out.
Maori have taken to the streets many times to express their grievances at the loss of their tribal lands to settlers. I don't think the Maori are huge fans of multiculturalism somehow. And lets not forget the Christchurch shootings, two examples of ethnic tensions, one of which was murderous. Oops!
Absolutely correct.
This book needs to be serialized on the radio as "book of the week" or "book at bedtime".
I turned 75 two weeks ago and I now get the BBC (which I almost never watch) absolutely free! Great, totally resent paying for this biased rubbish.
It is sad that they (out of benign concern) think "you need the BBC" you don't need it. It is a second death. A minute lost forever at a glowing screen. Go for walks. Love your family. Refuse to watch the BBC and their undignified "gifts"
You are not going to get it free for much longer as the BBC are to put a stop to it, after all, the money to pay all those obscene fees to presenters and salaries to the managers has to come from somewhere.
@@brianrodney712 am I the only person that thinks that is a good thing? Just because you're retired "they" want you in front of "the screen" as much as possible.. its like they want to anesthetise them.. like in one flew over the cuckoo's nest
Ian Turner not any more!
I've just discovered this channel. Superb!
Now that was worth watching - thank you
Thank you gentlemen.Excellent discussion.
Very interesting discussion. Who do these people at the BBC think they are? Who gave them the authority to decide what is in the best interests of the people? And surely they can't be so deaf, dumb and blind as to believe that, in today's social media world, their distortions remain undetected?
What a great shame that a one-time noble institution is now seen as a propaganda outfit by so many. - and not just by those in the UK, I'm afraid.
The BBC do not have the ability to think in the abstract, so unable to comprehend that the EU membership for people outside London, BBC and Parliament is not a force for good.
Here in Australia, we have exactly the same problem with the ABC. Like the BBC, the ABC does not honour it's Charter of "unvarnished truth".
We hear the same from Canada re the CBC. Not a surprise given that ABC & CBC are both modelled on the CBC -- although , in the case of the CBC, it is part-funded by commercials and receives rest of funding directly from government rather than via licence fee. It was anti-CBC sentiment that led to creation of Rebel Media, which is now a significant force in the Anglosphere.
100% common sense viewed here,so refreshing to hear a summary that I agree with.
Years ago, when I was growing up, we had ,The Archers’ a story of country folk. The people were characterised as good people. They would help each other, and worry about each other. This was sent around the world and gave a positive view of us. Then the BBC presented Albert Square, where people cheat, steal, are unfaithful to their partners, causing heart ache and unhappiness all the time. This is now the types of people that we think are normal, even though we are surrounded by people who are really trying to make other people’s lives better. This critical cynical view of normal people is so wrong. What can we do about being displayed much worse than we are, when others nations show themselves as heroes.
I have read the book - I can recommend it.
What a fabulous interview! 35 minutes well spent. Thank you for hosting this content.
So glad I eventually clicked on this. An excellent, coherent discussion.
There is nothing noble about it. The sooner people realise that the better.
The BBC has enormous influence via patronage. A leftwing university professor, journalist or comedian can expect repeated invitations to appear on panel shows, or to narrate documentaries or present a TV series. In this way the BBC funds left wing figures, pays their salaries. They can acquire an entire career via BBC patronage. A person whose views are contrary to the BBC's narrative won't be invited to the BBC. The Guardian newspaper has annual losses in eight £ figures. The BBC places virtually all of its advertising for jobs in the media section of The Guardian, thereby funding the leftwing newspaper. Repeatedly inviting Guardian journalists to appear on the BBC is a means of padding their salaries.
"So What Your Saying Is"...
Perfect title. Good job.
What a brillaint interview from both Peter and Robin displaying the truth and what we are are now living under.
No they are not they're both talking crap
Now we know why Tony Blair wanted half of all school leavers to go to university -
jasbinder singh the mass influx of lower IQ students in the late 90s onwards did not question the indoctrination and relished the opportunity to be a ‘champion’ for social justice causes and perceived as fashionably politically correct. Naivety and narcissism.
This going to university madness must end. I laugh at most graduates nowadays. Graduates with degrees, but no knowledge. Graduates who are English, and their parents and grandparents are white English, and they cannot draft a simple letter in English. It is truly shocking. They are doing degrees in "music technology", degree in "outdoor studies". It is truly shocking. What we need is proper degrees in Science, Sociology, History, Literature etc etc, and good and credible pathways to solid vocational studies. Vocational route seems to have been totally abandoned, and everyone seems to be interested in doing these useless degrees.
And then import a load of people to full the skills gap he created...
Good for this gentleman for coming forward, takes guts
This is a excellent video, well worth watching in full.
Mitterand did the same thing with immigration in France - by opening the doors to those from the Mahgreb, he knew he was importing votes for the PS.
I'm fed up to the back teeth with diversity. English is an ethnicity (look it up). By rights England should be at least 95% ethnic English. It's currently around the 75% mark. London is below 50% and Birmingham is not far behind. The madness began in 1948 but got a whole lot worse thanks to Blair. Subsequent Tory governments failed to stop the rot, to their immense shame.
Excellent, loved the bit when they both burst out laughing at the thought of French pride. When they spoke about the uniformity of news channels I had to disagree slightly,as Sky News Australia is infinately better than it's British counterpart.
Excellent interview. I'm off to but the book now. Thanks both
This was like breathing-in oxygen.
Wish Peter stayed on with UKIP.
The BBC promotes diversity of everything except diversity of thought.
Really interesting conversation that just helped to confirm my personal view of the BBC and the so called MSM. So disappointed Peter left UKIP. If you were unhappy with Gerard's leadership (I personally think he's courageous and providing excellent leadership), there is going to be a leadership election very soon. We need people with your obvious intelligence and commitment. We don't all have to agree on everything. But all the best for your project.
The title BBC has an air of authority, truth being unbiased. We grew up with it the trusted, comforting, eloquent voices. But now we know to look under the rock to see the truth.
NEVER be scared to shine light on darkness. 😊
We need the names of those dictating BBC agenda policies.
Simply first class.
A proper discussion between adults about the matters of the day.
Quality. Thank you.
The BBC; "The UK will run out of water in 25 years time as demand outstrips supply. The reasons for this are climate change and population growth."
Can you guess which solution the BBC didn't suggest? You guessed it! They never said anything about reducing immigration.
Informative; refreshing to see interviewer listen and let the speaker finish his sentences.
What you say also applies to Australia with the ABC.
And the CBC in Canada is even worse.
Mike yes absolutely. Except no tv license in Australia. Sadly I was a mad ABC fan and used to go into the second lounge and watch while my parents were on commercial tv. I was crazy about the BBC dramas shown by the ABC and when I came back to the uk I was still convinced that the BBC was brilliant. I now refuse to pay the license fee but as I never watch live to air television I don’t need it. I get all my news from reliable sources on you tube who with no or very limited budgets manage to outshine the 4 billion pounds worth of shit spewing out of the BBC. The on camera wankers think of themselves as stars not reporters. With the salary’s they get is it any wonder. £200,000 up to two million pounds a year. Ridiculous.
The five eyes countries are all under Zionist control.
On Friday, the BBC news app carried a piece informing me that the MoD have an emergency bunker and 3500 troops ready to mobilise in the event of a no-deal Brexit. They've long ago moved beyond mere partisanship and into the realm of hysterical lunacy.
Excellent series of interviews Peter, many thanks. No mention of Russia Today giving the BBC / SKY et al a run for their money.
Thank goodness there are people like Robin Aitken who are willing to speak out about things that are generally hushed up and pushed under the carpet. Excellent interview, thank you very much.
AT LAST...someone who can offer a cogent and informative perspective.
And thank you to "So what you saying..." for objective discussion (let's hope thought police don't try ban you)
OUTSTANDING, great discussion with very credible people.
I went back to college in the 1990s. Most of the Tutors were leaning that way. As I was in my mid 40s and could see through their reterick.
Just finished my OU degree at 42 and I know exactly what you mean I even think some tutors down marked me for my anti left views which are not extreme just healthily sceptical
rhetoric is the word you were looking for.....1990s tutors were already uneducated fools...nothing to learn from them.
Writing this in January 2020. The tide is indeed turning. Let's hope this is the year we say goodbye BBC. Thank you Peter and all your excellent guests for your endeavours in rolling the stone away.
BBC - a duty to inform? A TV programme we should have expected from them about Brexit, before the referendum, but never materialised, would have been a courtroom-style inquiry which would have had arguments from both sides stating their case, and each being fairly cross-examined, point by point, and covering several hours and days. The aspects covered, for example: legal issues, trade, immigration (pros and cons), economy, finance,...etc. Instead, we got the usual tabloid-style, confrontational format which, curiously, always ran out of time before getting anywhere.
Good suggestion...shame it's too late.
Interesting and informative interview. Don’t doubt Aitken’s take on the BBC for a moment.
Very interesting. Good choice of guest Peter.
As a hobby I study people's body language and persona ,these are genuine believable souls ,take notice and inwardly digest what they share with you ,regards Sebastian ghy
You could replace Brexit with Climate change as to how the BBC treats it.
So glad I found this channel. It is difficult to hold onto your own ideas, integrity and beliefs when all around you are singing from a different hymn sheet. Listening to people discussing what is actually going on is a relief, which is why Soros and the radicals want to shut down social media. Social media is the modern equivalent of the revolution of the printing press.
A fascinating interview, thanks for posting it.
I'm so grateful for this channel on UA-cam......Love the discussions. Keep up the great & Important work.
Brilliant! Really enjoyed this. Sharing with friends. 👏👏👏
Lovely to hear intelligent conversation, thank you .
No TV/license since 2003
I will not be renewing my BBC licence I decided that long time ago
This video just confirms everything I already know, so frustrating...
What I've suspected for so long.
Excellent exposé of the BBC.
I knew all of this from UA-camrs ...3 years ago
My son went for an audition for an advert for Sainsbury's in Manchester. Whether he got it or not, I did not care less. But what amused me was the advert sent to he agents. It said, and I paraphrase, "We do not welcome candidates with a Merseyside accent." As a scouser, I did find this stereotyping rather interesting.
No, you have guessed it, my son did not get the gig. Why? He was not the right colour. They wanted a Black man with a white wife and a whiter-shade-of-pale son would not have cut the mustard. Either that or it would have produced a very angry (non-Sainsburys shopper) father.
So, the result was a half-chat family. Father black, mother white (the only way adverts accept the arrangement).
Fine by me, but not so fine by the people of Liverpool when they found out about the agency advert.
"So what you're saying is..." Love the title! 😅
Great interview. It highlights views about the BBC that I have held for the past 20 years. They have their agenda embedded in every program whether it is news or drama. It's everywhere
Why do they imagine telling us demonstrable falsehoods is good for us? It's akin to telling us smoking is healthy and the tooth fairy is real.
I'm reading Robin's book, The Noble Liar, at the moment, and it's very, very good. It's an in-depth sociological look at the BBC and Britain of the last 60 years. Highly recommended.
Excellent video! I have had to "like" it several times, as UA-cam keeps removing my like.
Expressed so well you speak for the silenced majority. Thank you.
Before the referendum Have i got news for you were constantly bashing EU leavers.
One reason why i stopped paying for the tv licence and stopped watching television. Also the constant multi ethnic brainwashing on commercials and tv shows.
Early on I bemoaned the fact that this excellent new show had so few views. Coming back to it now I’m encouraged that it has nearly 100k views. That said, after rewatching the interview I can’t help wishing it had even more exposure.
Thank you, David. Yes, our very first episode remains v popular and shall soon pass 100k views. Our show as a whole is about to cross the 1 million view mark after only 5 months. We're delighted.