Jesus in Recent Qur’an Translations | The Jesus of the Qur'an vs. the Jesus of the New Testament
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- In this video I discuss the presentation of Jesus in the Qur'an and how this is interpreted and rendered into English by recent Qur'an translations. I show that recent translations emphasize the difference between the Qur'anic Jesus and the Jesus of the New Testament and that in fact, the two scriptures have very different presentations of Jesus. I also discuss the origin and history of the name 'Isa and much more.
If you enjoyed this video please be sure to give it a like and subscribe to Exploring the Qur'an and the Bible for more content like this.
![Sean Anthony & Gabriel Said Reynolds [1]: Muhammad, the Caliphs, Variant Qur'ans, and Orientalism](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BGzvqGGISV0/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally a new one ! Pls keep it coming Gabriel 🎉
I saw you on EWTN and bought your book. I also subscribed to your channel and just now been watching your videos. Your discourses are very comprehensive and instructive. I am learning and understanding a lot. Thank you! May God continue to bless you and your work.
This channel is the best thing that happened to Historical context of Islam
I am so done with classical theology and sources which has too many contradictory reports. Now some stuff makes sense
Very much agree.
Why would you take information from sources which were enemies of Islam and islamaphobes back in the day to be authentic. 😂 It's like taking history of Donald trump from bidens advisors. 😂
Why would you take history lesson of Islam from enemies of Islam and islamaphobes. That's like taking Donald trump's history from bidens advisors. 😂 It's non sensical!!
That man in Video has told you bigg lies, but you do not have knowledge to catch his lies. Only Goldsmith knows about real Gold and Fake Gold; and we are Goldsmith
@@abdar-rahman6965 😂
Thank you brother! May Our God bless you and protect you in Jesus Christ mighty name amen 🙏
This is incredible info Gabriel, thank you for sharing it with us! 🙏🏼
"And their saying, 'Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.' And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them. And indeed, those who differ about it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except following assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain." (4:157)
1. The Quran clarifies that Jesus was not killed nor crucified:
The Quran explicitly states in Surah An-Nisa (4:157) that Jesus, the son of Mary, was neither killed nor crucified. Instead, it was made to appear so to the people. This assertion directly challenges the common Christian narrative of Jesus' crucifixion and death.
2. The story about Jesus Barabbas and the dream of Pilate's wife indicate the possibility of that:
The narrative involving Jesus Barabbas and the dream of Pilate's wife, found in the New Testament, suggests ambiguity surrounding the crucifixion. Barabbas, a criminal, was released instead of Jesus, which might imply a case of mistaken identity or substitution. Furthermore, Pilate's wife reportedly had a troubling dream about Jesus and warned her husband to have nothing to do with his death.
3. The Synoptic Problem and differences in narration between the Synoptic Gospels and John:
The Synoptic Problem highlights the literary relationship between the first three Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and their significant overlap in content, structure, and wording. However, these Gospels also contain unique details not found in John. For example:
- The Institution of the Lord’s Supper:
The Synoptic Gospels describe Jesus instituting the Lord’s Supper, a key event absent in John (Matthew 26:26-29, Mark 14:22-25, Luke 22:17-20).
- The Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane:
The Synoptic Gospels detail Jesus' prayers and sorrow in Gethsemane, which are not mentioned in John (Matthew 26:36-46, Mark 14:32-42, Luke 22:39-46).
- The Betrayal by Judas with a Kiss:
The Synoptic Gospels recount Judas identifying Jesus with a kiss, while John omits this detail and instead shows Jesus identifying himself (John 18:4-5) (Matthew 26:47-50, Mark 14:43-45, Luke 22:47-48).
- The Disciples' Desertion:
All three Synoptic Gospels agree that after Jesus was arrested, his disciples deserted him and fled (Matthew 26:56, Mark 14:50, and Luke 22:54-62). This unanimous agreement introduces further ambiguity about the events that followed, as those closest to Jesus were no longer present to witness them firsthand.
These differences and unique accounts contribute to the ambiguity and complexity surrounding the events of Jesus' crucifixion. The variations between the Synoptic Gospels and John, combined with the disciples' abandonment, further support the Quranic perspective by highlighting discrepancies in the narrative, suggesting that the traditional understanding of Jesus' death may not be as clear-cut as commonly believed.
Thank you professor. That was very helpful.
Isa or Esa is an Arabized form of the original name Esho or Esha. The derivation is like this: Yeshua is usually pronounced as Eshua. Like yisrael or yishmael are read as Israel and Ishmael. So pronouncing it as Eshua, it transformed in Aramaic or Syric as Esho which sounds or pronounce as Esha. Finally it's Arabic for is Esa.
Wouldn't it be great to back your refreshing theory with reputable references?
@@josephthybrother9534 There are reputable sources out there. I highly encourage to look it up to translation of Aramaic and Arabic.
I collect the names of Jesus in many languages based on comments made by UA-camrs .
Isa (Quran), Isho ( (Aramaic), Iosa ( Irish/ Scottish), Tsisa ( Cherokee) , Iesous ( Greek Latin)
Yeshua ( Hebrew) , Yesu (Talmud) ,Yasu ( Christian Arab Bible) , Yeshu ( Hindi)
Jesus and his disciples were muslims. Theres no capital M muslim. Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses all were muslims. Came to their ppl to deliver the same message to worship the one God
No, they were not, because the first Muslim was Muhammad.
Hi Mr. Reynolds, could you consider addressing Q4:156 in light of Peter Schafer's book Jesus in the Talmud?
I hope he responds to this:
ua-cam.com/video/F7qQ4BspaAU/v-deo.htmlsi=DCMaZ__sO81ASxwO
The name Isa (Jesus), may be derived from the meaning of creation. Either the name Jesus means that he is a (created) without a father, like the creation of Adam, as indicated by the verse;
3:59 Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allāh is like that of Adam. He created him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was. [Surah Āl-‘Imrān]
Or that the name Jesus means that he can (create), with God’s permission;
3:49 'Indeed I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allāh. [Surah Āl-‘Imrān]
So the name Jesus means creation. His people called him that: either because they found that God created Jesus as a unique and special creation without a human father (just as Adam was created before him without a human father), or because they saw Jesus creating and doing, with God’s permission, 'deeds/works/supernatural works' that they could not do the likes of. Therefore, they nicknamed him (according to their language) with the name Jesus (from the verb ‘āsah’) in order to describe his condition that they had learned. The verb “Asah” in the Canaan language means (create, make, do, made,...).
This name, Isa (Arabic); Jesus (English), is in the language of Jesus' people. The linguistic root that has this meaning is a Canaanite Hebrew root, which is the root (asah); three letters in Arabic alphabet (ayn-seen-haa). The verb asah comes in the meaning of: act, make, work... and is used a lot in the Hebrew Torah. These are examples:
Isaiah 44:24 I am the LORD, who made all things,
The Hebrew verb (asah) = made
Isaiah 51:13 and have forgotten the LORD, your Maker,
(o-se-ka) = your maker
The Hebrew verb (asah) = maker
Genesis 2:4 in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens.
(asowt) = that made
Genesis 42:28 What is this that God has done to us?
(asah) = [that] has done
Exodus 6:1 Then the LORD said unto Moses, Now shalt thou see what I will do to Pharaoh
(asah) = do
Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them,
(asah) = made
Psalms 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
(u-ma-a-seh) = the work
Psalms 28:5 Because they do not regard the works of the LORD or the work of his hands,
(ma-a-seh) = the work
Job 10:8-9 'Your hands have made me and fashioned me, An intricate unity; Yet You would destroy me. Remember, I pray, that You have made me like clay. And will You turn me into dust again?
(is-se-bu-ni) = have made me
(a-si-ta-ni) = you have made me
Job 35:10 But none says, 'Where is God my Maker,
(o-say) = my maker
Psalms 149:2 Let Israel rejoice in their Maker;
(be-o-saw) = in their maker
Exodus 20:4 "You shall not make for yourself a carved image,
(ta-a-seh) = make
Exodus 32:4 and made a golden calf.
(way-ya-a-se-hu) = and made
Exodus 34:17 "You shall not make for yourself any gods of cast metal.
Isaiah 56:1 "Keep justice, and do righteousness,
(wa-a-su) = and do
Isaiah 56:2 and keeps his hand from doing any evil."
(a-so-wt) = doing
Genesis 26:10 "What is this you have done to us?
(a-si-ta) = you have done
Genesis 26:30 so he made them a feast and they ate and drank
(way-ya-as) = so he made
Genesis 27:31 And had made also he savory food
(way-ya-as) = and had made
Genesis 31:28 Now you have done foolishly.
(a-sow) = in [so] doing
Genesis 31:46 And they took stones and made a heap
(way-ya-a-su-) = and made
Genesis 41:47 And brought forth the ground
(wat-ta-as) = And brought forth
Genesis 42:20 " And they did so.
(way-ya-a-su-) = and they did
Genesis 44:5 You have done evil in doing this.'"
(a-si-tem) = doing
Genesis 44:15 "What deed is this that you have done?
(ham-ma-a-seh) = deed [is]
(a-si-tem) = you have done
The people of Jesus, called him by this name in their language from the verb “asah” (create, make, do, made,…). It is as if they wanted to say that God made him directly (without a father), just as he made Adam, because they found him different from the rest of the people (who must have a father). Or perhaps they called it that, because Jesus, used to create living creatures for them out of clay. The name Jesus may have the meaning of creation (God created him directly, or it creates by God’s permission). He is the only one to whom this condition was applied, as his people found it, so they called him by his condition and conduct, and they derived his name in their language from the verb (asah); literally in Arabic (ayn-seen-haa).
Due to lost information among the first generations and forgetfulness among humans in general. Yeshua/Yasuwa is a wrong and a fabricated name; it came long after the death of Jesus. Later came the Greek name Iesous, as well Christ (instead of Messiah) comes from the Greek.
The Qur’an restored the original name of the Prophet Jesus, which is Isa. As people called him in his time.
The Muslims, do not know anything about the prophet Muhammad and his companions (outside the Qur’an). They are like others before them among the People of the Book (they do not know about Moses and his era, nor about Jesus and his era). The Qur’an has exposed the ignorance of the People of the Book, as we have known as Muslims.
Brother, do you publish your works or do videos?
@@richardanthony3267 Sorry for the late reply. Actually is someone else effort that I found somewhere while ago on UA-cam comment section.
He also did something similar with the name Maryam/Mary.
The Hebrew name (Yarim), it means (to raise), and the Hebrew name (Harim), it means (Dedicated to God).
These are examples;
Leviticus 22:15 They offer to Yahweh
In Hebrew = (yarimu Yahweh)
Numbers 31:52 They offered to Yahweh
Hebrew = (herimu Yahweh)
Exodus 35:24 Everyone who offered an offering
Hebrew = (kal-merim-tərumat)
Perhaps it is from these verbs (Yarimu, Herimu, Merim) and their meanings in the previous expressions that the name (Maryam/Mary), the mother of the Messiah, came.
This is what Maryam’s mother did (As we read in Surah Āl-‘Imrān), as she (raised) her daughter to God, asking Him: My Lord, accept from me (what I raise) to You [3:35 so accept this from me]. God accepted (what she raised) to Him [3:37 So her Lord accepted her]. And it was true for her daughter to be called by Maryam's name, because the meaning of Maryam is (raised) to God, that is, presented and brought close to Him.
After the hostility, the tension and the hatred on the part of the disbelievers reached it's highest level, the Jews and Romans want to kill Jesus.
3:54 And they [i.e., the disbelievers] planned, but Allāh planned. And Allāh is the best of planners. [Surah Āl-‘Imrān]
The Qur’an is logical, realistic, simple, and easy. But the hadiths complicate matters and confuse thinking. For example, the hadiths said that God raised Jesus so that he would return again or raised him so that he would not die...etc. So they complicated matters. But the reason for the raising was simple and clear. After Jesus death. Suppose that God did not remove the body. What would happen? Either the enemies break into the house and take the body, crucify it, and play with it, and this is not what God wants. Or the disciples bury the body and hide it, then the enemies do not find it, so they search for it, so they arrest the disciples and torture them to confess the location of the grave, then they dig him up and crucify the corpse. It is clear that God raised the body so that they would not crucify it and play with it. God put Jesus to death so that they would not kill him, then He raised the body so that they would not crucify him. Therefore God said, “They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him. But if He did not remove the body, the objectors would have said at least they found the body and crucified it.
Jesus survived the crucifixion and traveled to India
The ascension of Jesus was only described by Luke. For such an important event, this is illogical.My opinion , it did not happen.
My theory, because the Jews wanted to kill him and some of his disciples betrayed him thus Jesus became reclusive going to areas the public may not know him and at the same finding a cure for his hand injury.
The empty tomb gave an important clue that Jesus had resuscitated in the tomb and he may himself roll the stone of the tomb.He ate food after that in front of his disciples to prove he was still alive .
The Qur’an is a knowledge of the Hour in the verse No. 61, Surah Az-Zukhruf, that has nothing to do with the Messiah.
Verse 4 in the same Surah (And indeed, it is in the Mother of the Book)... And verse 44 (And indeed, it is a Remembrance) will make you understand the meaning of Verse 61 (And indeed, it is for knowledge)... Notice the same pattern (Wa innahoo/And indeed, it is), (Wa innahoo/And indeed, it is...).
Most commentators said that the verse seemed to mean (and Jesus was a knowledge of the Hour). The word “Jesus” was inserted (forcefully), and this interpretation must have been influenced by the many hadiths (which they stole from the Christian religion) that state the return of the Messiah. But the true, impartial interpretation that is completely consistent with the Qur’anic text is that the verse seeks a meaning (and indeed the Qur’an is a knowledge for the Hour). The three formulas are similar: {Wa innahoo} (4), {Wa innahoo} (44), {Wa innahoo} (61). This supports the meaning of (Wa innahoo) in verse (61): [And indeed, it is knowledge for the Hour], which is the Qur’an.
Many people (perhaps most of them) do not believe in the Hour, do not believe in the Day of Reckoning, do not believe in the Day of Judgment, do not believe in the Hereafter, do not believe in the meeting with God, do not believe in the Resurrection. They do not believe in the Day of Regret, nor do they believe in the Day of Promise. In general, they do not believe in that day or its torment.
This is the meaning that the Qur’an is a knowledge for the Hour. That is, it informs a person of its occurrence, its coming, its arrival, and its horrors. When the Hour occurs, a person must have prepared for it with faith and good deeds, and if he disbelieved in it or neglected it, he will have no argument on that day and no excuse, because the Qur’an has informed him and told him.
The Qur’an came to inform us of the Hour, warn us of it, and give us everything we need to know about it:
42:7 And thus We have revealed to you an Arabic Qur’ān that you may warn the Mother of Cities [i.e., Makkah] and those around it and warn of the Day of Assembly, about which there is no doubt. A party will be in Paradise and a party in the Blaze. [Surah Ash-Shūra]
40:15 He places the inspiration of His command [i.e., revelation] upon whom He wills of His servants to warn of the Day of Meeting. [Surah Ghāfir]
6:51 And warn by it [i.e., the Qur’ān] those who fear that they will be gathered before their Lord - for them besides Him will be no protector and no intercessor - that they might become righteous. [Surah Al-An‘ām]
39:71 And those who disbelieved will be driven to Hell in groups until, when they reach it, its gates are opened and its keepers will say, "Did there not come to you messengers from yourselves, reciting to you the verses of your Lord and warning you of the meeting of this Day of yours?" They will say, "Yes, but the word [i.e., decree] of punishment has come into effect upon the disbelievers." [Surah Az-Zumar]
78:40 Indeed, We have warned you of an impending punishment on the Day when a man will observe what his hands have put forth and the disbeliever will say, "Oh, I wish that I were dust!" [Surah An-Naba’]
Most of the talking of the Qur’an are about the afterlife. Therefore, the noble verse [43:61 And indeed it is knowledge for the Hour], means that the Qur’an is knowledge for the Hour.
True. 43:61 points toward Quran. Beautifully explained 👍👍👍
Great perspective, I have to agree with everything you mentioned.
In Quranic verse 43:61, no any name of Jesus appears. Pronoun INN-HU of 43:61 points toward Quran. In several verses of Quran, the Pronoun INNA-HU is used for Quran. In same Surah 43, in verse 44, the Pronoun Inna-Hu is used for Quran. Always understand Quran by Quran only. Never SUPERIMPOSE on Quran millions of Fabricated hadiths
In the Context of Quran Surah who is inna hu 43:61 point to?
In 43:57 the Son of Mary
The verses where innahu refers to the Quran, is where the Quran is the context. But for 43:61, the context is Jesus, if you read the preceding verses.
thank you!
Quran never talks about HawaariYoon Ambiguously in 3:52. I say: stop your lies. That Arabic word shows that those people used to wear PURE WHITE DRESS; and history shows and Dead Sea scrolls show that they were Essene who used to wear White dress. So HarwaariYoon are Essene-Muslims 3:52 وَٱشْهَدْ بِأَنَّا مُسْلِمُونَ
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaah where is my Mommy 😪😪😪
You could have been a great author of hadiths.
Hawariun means disciples (literally: ‘those you discuss with’). I have no idea how you linked that to white dressing
Very interesting. Are there any preislamic sources for the jesus of the quran other than the bible?
That would be interesting. But he seems to be a mixture of various non canonical gospel portrayals of jesus, some gnostic beliefs, etc.
Arabic poetry is interesting source
Having most of the quran infancy narrative but believing in curccfixion
What?
google the infancy gospels
Dr Gabriel or others: in the New Testament, Paul regularly calls himself a servant or slave of Christ. I was thinking of Arabic names like "Abdullah," and other uses of "abd." Do you think there is a philological or theological connection with the New Testament here?
This is reaching. The arabs didn't learn the word slave from someone, specially not someone as late as Paul.
Just because somebody says "Hello", it doesn't mean that if you say "Hello" you got it from that specific person.
@black-dj9mr I am not speaking of the word slave or servant, I am asking about one calling themselves "slave of Christ" or "slave of Allah." It may be that these are independent traditions, or perhaps they have a common root in Judaism, or Quran was inspired by the NT.
@@mcosu1Possibly, the Arabic title “Abdul Masih,” meaning servant of Christ, is attested to by an early inscription from Al-Hirah, and some pre-Islamic poetry contains references to “Abd” that seems to always be within a Christian monotheistic framework.
@@Sjsg68 I thought there may be a connection! Fascinating.
@@mcosu1 Yes, it seems that the title developed particularly with Christian evangelization in the Arabian Peninsula, and this is a type of evangelism that is also attested in inscriptions and external evidence.
Why is the Qur'an just plaguarised stories as it plaguarises from the Alexander romance , the infancy gospel of Thomas and zoastrian, Jewish and Christian apochraphal work
Muhammad as I don't believe Muhammad compiled the Qur'an
It is like they raided a library and put some random books together but didn't have an understanding of why they should go together
Where is the historical criticism and the source criticism, why does noone look into the authorship of each individual surah as they are completely anonymous
The aspect is when where the surahs written as we can tell maybe from the plaguarised works in the Qur'an a time period but there is no actual dating given
We have like a critical edition Qur'an but where is all the other scholarly work
God has revealed a book at a time to humanity. after one book is corrupted he reveals another one. The Quran is the last book revealed to humans and Jins. He protected it from corruption Himself. So, don't be mistaken by being ignorant or lied to by someone, Mister!
What about people like Dr. Hythem Sidky and Dr. Shady Nasser who have both been on this channel multiple times who believe the Quran to have one authorship? There is a distinct difference in Plagiarism and interpolation. Different societies take the same stories and define their own moral compasses within them to fit their belief systems. Going by that logic we must deem every work of theology to be plagiarism due to outside influences from other religions/cultures. This is why Muslims are so hesitant to partake in western academics because they’re hit with an onslaught of discrediting and double standards you don’t find in any other field of theological studies.
@@user-td2sz1em8f it is clear you haven't read the tanach and the new testament
We view the Qur'an more like the book of morman as it is not being based on historical events and uses plaguarism
Why should we use a book that uses no eyewitness accounts
You are an Ignorant and posting nonsense
As you've noticed, the stories in the Qur'an were not contained in a single book. Moreover, they were not available in Arabic during the lifetime of Muhammed. If you keep thinking logically, you might reach to a conclusion that you don't want.
Many questions about the Quran cannot be answered without exploring the deeper or hidden Quran (the Kitab). This includes the question being posed here.
Concerning life of Jesus; should we believe in Quran 15:9, 17:88, 41:42 or in Irani Movie or in 4 ANONYMOUS Gospels?
The Gospels are as anonymous as any Sura in the Quran, really. Don't believe the lies that we don't really know who wrote them, if the authorship of the Gospels were a hadith, we'd have to make up a grade above sahih to put them.
@@tiagorodrigues3730
Your own Bible Scholar say that 4 Gospels are anonymous and being tampered for Centuries. Gospels of 4th Century are different from Gospels of today.
Have you read and understood the whole Quran? You never. Then Rationally, how can you say if Quran is a good book are a bad book?
Quran is not an anonymous book. Within Quran God repeats several times that
_It is Me God who has sent down Quran on Mohammad, and I will protect Quran 15:9, 17:88, 41:42_
*Professor John Burton PhD wrote the Book "The Collection of Quran". After heavy argumentation, he concluded that Quran which we have today is the same Quran which was with Mohammad.*
And Hadiths are Fabricated Stories. If you want to compare 4 Anonymous Gospels with hadiths, then you are not wrong
A person who memorizes whole Quran is called Hafiz. Prophet Mohammad was First Hafiz. Then were his thousands Companions, HAFIZ. Today there are over 50 million Hafiz. All recite same Quran which was recited by Mohammad because MEMORIZATION-CHAIN never broke even for a Second in past 1400 years. This is the way: God has protected Quran, but those people who are already destined to Hell (Quran 7:179), will not realize that Truth
50 Million Hafiz >>> This Number is more than total Population of Spain. If we throw all books and Computer archives in the Sea; Quran will be right back within hours. Just bring one Hafiz and print whole Quran. This is the way: how God has protected His Last Book
@@tiagorodrigues3730
Your Comments show: you are a hater, and a hater burns in its own fire. Even without understanding the whole Quran; you have become a Scholar of Quran!!! Feel some shame and go way
People in the comments are trying to ignore the fact that the word Isa is mentioned in a safaic inscription which is what the first portion of this lecture is about !!!!
I don’t get it guys I mean what more should be done?! If an inscription from the 4th century uses then why are people in the comments are still referring to outdated possibilities??!!!
It’s possible عيسى is the backward spelling of يسوع from the root words
The Original Name of Jesus was Isa which is mentioned in Quran and there is historical evidence for that
@@abdar-rahman6965 really? What’s your evidence ?
@@joeshaer777
Hindus over 2000 years old book Puranas which keeps all records, contains this info. Once King Shaliwahana was on visit where he met a man in white dress, and he asked him: Gentleman: what is your name and who are you. He responded: my Name is *Isa* and wicked people of my nation have dealt me very badly and ......
@@abdar-rahman6965 so Jesus name is originally Sanskrit ?
There’s no reason to think that it were spelt backward, other than a hypothesis that it was done so to rhyme with Musa (Moses).
More likely it is derived from the Greek iesus, arabicised through the removal of ‘us’ Greek suffix and exchange for alef phoneme for the letter ayin (there are some attestations for this type of exchange).
44:23 Sad and ironic how we are seeing biases in translation. The addition of Gabriel, the blowing into the sleeve etc. And yet we muslims say that our Quran remains unchanged; this is adulteration.
The Arabic is unchanged. Interpretations, meanwhile, are many of course
9:119 isn’t the corrrct reference at 25:48. Can we have the correct reference?
In fact, he never read the whole Quran. He is a hater
@@abdar-rahman6965. Ex muslim here .. he Definitely has read more than your three generations combined😂
It was a typo I just checked the verse is 9:111 not 9:119
@@peaceorpieces6461
You are a liar and he is a hater
@@peaceorpieces6461
He told lies and lies in this video. That man is without Conscious
Quran Mention Essa ibn Marrium (Son of Marry ) i tell you Why He was Born without Father Only Jews Worship One GOD and knew only GOD can Craete any thing he want without any Raw Material when He decide to Create some Thing He Just Use Word Be and Done and Jews knew That Almighty brought them from Egypt and Help them Jesus is Mentioned In Torah and Quran .
Can you get Daniel Bannoura on the show?
Sir you really did a hard work on this presentation. Isa is arabic term just like Musa from Egyptian name Musha.
And yes we muslim ❤️ Jesus that v act like him by doing prostration in our prayers like Jesus did. Fast like Jesus did and we wear robes like Jesus did. R living style is like Jesus. What Christians do just believe he "died" for their sins?
So it is clear, Isa is not Jesus. But it is interesting to learn, Isa originated from Safaitic Arabic in 4th century, who was worshipped by the Arab as deity.
How would you accept Isa when the Christian FAITH made a L-I-A-R of Jesus of the Bible. The Bible testifies.
The Christians need to FIRST rem-ove the pl-an-k from their own e-y-e.
God Almighty in His wisdom and fore knowledge knew that there will be the d1sh0n3st d3n13rs of His FINAL Prophet - Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) so He left the previous scriptures in a state which 3xp0s3 and deb-unk the FAITH / doctrine / position of the re-je-ct-ors of His FINAL Prophet and The FINAL Testament 👉 The Quran. The Muslim can put the Quran aside and Christian Bible still backs up the Muslim FAITH while utt-erly exp0sing and deb-unking the Christian FAITH.
No, the Quran consistently refers to him as "Isa, son of Maryam", so clearly it is not originating from a pagan tradition. More likely it came from the East Syriac "Iso" or Greek "Iesous".
This is like saying Yeshua is not Jesus.
Not in 4:159 (as you said) but word RAFA is used in Quran 4:158. The meaning of Rafa in Quran is SPIRITUAL EXALTATION. Body of Dust will not be pulled by God to Himslef because Body of Dust cannot see God. Pls read Quran 7:143. Even in ancient Copies of 4 Gospels; Fable of Ascension and Return never exist
Jesus *SON OF MARY* and Isa *SON OF MARY* is same Person. A person who disputes this point is not a wise person nor is knowledgeable
Who is his father?
@@semiot8305He doesn’t have a biological father, that’s why he is referred to as “son of Mary”, rather than the conventional method amongst Semitic communities (and most of the world afaik) as ‘son of __father’s name_’_
Assuming you’re arguing from a polemical Christian perspective, the title son of God is not exclusive to Jesus, and isn’t meant to signify a father in any begotten sense, which would contradict the notion of Mary being a virgin (and more primarily, God’s nature. c.f. Numbers 23:19 “God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent…”).
@@lets_wrapitup Why?
@@semiot8305 Can you be more specific what you’re talking about?
@@lets_wrapitup Why didn't Isa have a biological father?
One could also mention that the Jesus of the Quran appears to have no brothers, his mother appears to be unmarried throughout, he defends his mother against adultery charges as a baby, there is no mention of the Romans, and there is no mention of "the Son of Man" or "the Kingdom of God", and he receives a book from Allah called 'the Injil'.
One of the major mistakes made by the ancient commentaries was their interpretation of the word “ummi” which led to a lack of understanding of what is meant by the Qur’an.
Most Muslims interpreted the word “ummi” as a person who does not read or write (the unlettered), illiterate, uneducated; because they thought that the word must have an Arabic derivation, which led to a fatal mistake.
The meaning of "ummi" is simply one of the nations (other than the nation of the children of Israel). The word “ummi” is the same as the word “gentile”. The word “ummi” is not a word invented by the Arabic language, but rather it is an Arabization that the Arabs took before Islam from the People of the Book, who used to repeat Aramaic/Hebrew words. The Arabs Arabized that Hebrew-Aramaic word into an Arabic word that suits their language.
2:78-79 And among them are gentiles who do not know the Scripture except by hearsay, and they only conjecture. So woe to those who write the "Scripture" with their own hands then say: “This is from God,” so that they can purchase with it a cheap price! Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they gained. [Surah Al-Baqarah]
3:75 That is because they said: “We have no obligation towards the gentiles.” They say about God lies while they know. [Surah Āl-‘Imrān]
62:2 He is the One who sent to the gentiles a messenger from among themselves, [Surah Al-Jumu‘ah]
7:157 Those who follow the messenger, the gentile prophet, whom they find written for them in the Torah and the Gospel; [Surah Al-A‘rāf]
7:158 So believe in God and His messenger, the gentile prophet, [Surah Al-A‘rāf]
3:20 And say to those who have received the Scripture and the gentiles: “Have you submitted?” [Surah Āl-‘Imrān]
Some mentioned that the "Ummyyun" are all peoples (except the Jews), and not just the nation (the Arabs). This is a better definition and more correct in meaning.
And some commentators said that the "Ummyyun" are those who do not have a book (the Scripture), that is, those who are neither Jews nor Christians.
It should be noted that the word “ummi” is not an Arabic word in origin.
So, when the Jews say the word "Ummyyun", they mean by it other than the Children of Israel. Therefore, The Holy Qur’an does not leave the major claim of the Jews without refuting it and affirming its invalidity, and their major claim is that they are specialized in prophecy to the exclusion of all other nations.
The truth is that the Arabs did not call themselves "Ummyyun", but rather the Jews called them that (the Jews called the Arabs and other peoples: "Ummyyun"). This is because the word “ummi” has a linguistic origin that is Aramaic and Hebrew.
Prophets continued to emerge from the Children of Israel for more than a thousand years (from Moses to Jesus). Therefore, the belief was established among the Jews and Christians that God does not send a prophet except from among the Children of Israel only (does not send from other nations). So God invalidated this false belief, and sent from the nations or from the "Ummyyun" (= sent from someone other than the nation of the Children of Israel) or as the Hebrew Aramaic language calls them: (Ummiah, Amut, Ummim). As God said, meaning that the People of the Book do not have a monopoly on the messengers among the Children of Israel, and the selection of the messengers is not in their hands, and they cannot prevent God’s grace from selecting His messengers from any people and from any nation. The matter of selecting the messengers is entirely in the hands of God, and no one controls or owns it. Anything to prevent or change (except God):
57:29 So that the followers of the Scripture should know that they have no power over the grace of God, and that all grace is in the hand of God. He bestows it upon whoever He wills. God is Possessor of Infinite Grace. [Surah Al-Hadīd]
62:2-4 He is the One who sent to the gentiles a messenger from among themselves, ... Such is the grace of God, which He bestows upon whoever He wills. God is Possessor of Infinite Grace. [Surah Al-Jumu‘ah]
2:105 Neither the disbelievers among the followers of the Scripture, nor the idol worshipers, wish that any good comes down to you from your Lord. But God chooses with His mercy whom He wishes; and God is Possessor of Infinite Grace. [Surah Al-Baqarah]
3:73-74 “And do not believe except as those who follow your religion.” Say: “The true guidance is the guidance of God.” That anyone should be given similar to what you have been given, or that they debate with you at your Lord. Say: “The bounty is in the hand of God, He gives it to whom He chooses, and God is Encompassing, Knowledgeable.” He singles out with His mercy whom He chooses, and God is with Great Bounty. [Surah Āl-‘Imrān]
4:53-54 Or would they have a portion of the sovereignty? If so, then they would not give the people a speck. Or do they envy the people for what God has given them of His bounty? [Surah An-Nisā’]
2:90 Miserable indeed is what they purchase with their souls, that they disbelieve in what God has sent down as a resentment that God would send down from His grace to whom He pleases of His servants; thus they have incurred wrath upon wrath. And the rejecters will have a humiliating retribution. [Surah Al-Baqarah]
40:15 He places the inspiration of His command, to whomever He chooses from among His servants, [Surah Ghāfir]
16:2 He sends down the angels with the revelations of His command, to whomever He chooses from among His servants [Surah An-Nahl]
The disbelievers of Quraysh made the same mistake as the People of the Book (who decided that the Prophet only comes from the Children of Israel). So the disbelievers of Quraysh wanted to decide, too (like the People of the Book before them) where the Messenger should come from, so they said the best thing would be for God to choose a Messenger from among the great men of Persia and Rome.
43:31 And they said: “If only this Qur’an was sent down to a great man from the two cities!” [Surah Az-Zukhruf]
So God made clear to them that this was not in their hand.
43:32 Are they the ones who assign your Lord's mercy? [Surah Az-Zukhruf]
I wonder since the Quran does not recognize sacrifice for sins.
Jews don't have explicit eternal afterlife torture in their Tanakh mythology, the Bible mythology has a couple of such evil references and the Quran mythology has quite a lot of such references. Jewish mythology is less vicious in the afterlife descriptions.
Hellenistic culture influence? Or divine revelation
Read the Talmud to see the amount of myths about the afterlife and that heaven is for Jews only
The Jews do have it in their tradition but have never felt the need to emphasise it due to their being 'chosen.'
Yahweh murdering innocent infants in cribs. Passover genocide is a big factor in people leaving buybull Barbaric. Luckily I found Quran no Passover infanticide in its exodus story 9 plagues only
they believe in reincarnation and transmigration of soul
what is the etymology for the name Issa/Iesa in quran?
Unknown
Religion for Breakfast has a great video on it. Check it out.
It is possible ghat if means the bull’ seamen. But in my opinion it is the Israelite name of Esau the villain son of Issac or thd elder twin brother of Jacob. Please read my post
The trinity is three gods.
@@AlonzoHarris235 If the Trinity is three gods and therefore false, and the Gospel teaches the Trinity (nobody in their right mind would deny it for John, nor in many other books of the N.T. - the Qur'an also orders Christians to stand by all that was sent to THEM by their Lord - Sura 5:68, which would include all the books 7th century Christians had in the N.T. and all churches had at least 22 books including the Syriac church, some of which with extremely high Christology like the Epistle to the Hebrews), then why did the Qur'an describe as "siddiq", trustworthy and righteous, the Gospel as it existed in the hands of the Christians in the 7th century e.g. Sura 2:41, told Christians they stand upon nothing if they don't judge by and obey what they have, present tense, Sura 5:47 and again 5:68, and inform anyone who doubts its revelations to have Christians vouch for it as an authority over it? Sura 10:94.
On your each point, I am pausing this video, and typing my *RATIONAL* answer.*
Almost three-quarters of the Arabic language is influenced by ancient neighboring civilizations.
There are lots of Arabic words of Persian, Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Roman, Abyssinia, Iraq, the Levant and Egypt origins, etc.
The Qur’an, as God said, is pure Arabic, but most people are lost in understanding the words of God.
If a foreign word is borrowed by the Arabs and Arabized and spreads among them and becomes intelligible to them, then it becomes Arabic, regardless of its oldest foreign origin. Therefore, all of the Qur’an’s words are Arabic, even if it contains words of non-Arabic origins.
For example, the word (Fir'aun/Pharaoh) originates from Egypt, not from the Arabian Peninsula. It was not the Arabs of the Peninsula who invented the word Pharaoh. The Arabs of the Peninsula took the word Pharaoh from the Egyptians later on and then Arabized it. Likewise, the word (Rum) has an Italian derivation and then the Arabs used it. The Arabs, like other peoples and languages, have borrowed Indian, Roman, Egyptian and Persian words for a long time... etc. Then they Arabize it according to their language.This is a natural thing in all languages. All languages take from each other.
"Persian, Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Roman, Abyssinia, Iraq, the Levant and Egypt origins, etc."
Iraq you said?
43:31 And they said: “If only this Qur’an was sent down to a great man from the two cities!” [Surah Az-Zukhruf]
There is a strong possibility that the two cities are Ctesiphon and Constantinople.
In the eyes of the Jāhiliyyah Arabs, there was nothing greater, stronger and bigger than Persia and Rome, the two powerful empires at the time that had ruled the world for centuries.
Arab tribes were subject to the Ghassanids and Manathira, who were subject to Persia and the Romans. The influence of the Romans extended to the north of the Arabian Peninsula, and the influence of Persia extended to its east, Oman, and Yemen.
Persia and Romans in Arab heritage appear as twins, and one is rarely mentioned without the other. We usually read the phrase (Khosrau and Caesar) or the phrase (Persia and the Romans), without separation, as if they were two sides of the same coin. Khosrau is hardly mentioned unless Caesar is with him, and no Persian is mentioned except with the Romans, apart from their coming with the same statement or report. The Qur’an linked Persia and the Romans. With the interpretation that the people of extreme valor [48:16 "You will be called to face a people of great might] are the Persians and the Romans. This natural pairing between Persia and the Romans fits very well with the word (Al Qaryatayn) in the verse.
It is permissible to use the word “Qarya” to refer to the capital of Persia or the Romans. (Al Qarya) is also the city.
What they meant by a great man? (King, ruler of a powerful empire, statesman of a great nation, a general of great army...etc)
Al Qaryatayn/The two cities in the verse is not what the interpretations mentioned (Mecca and Taif). The correct is that the two cities were the capitals of the Persians and the Romans. Meaning Ctesiphon (Al Mada'in) and Constantinople.
Quraysh knows its size and realizes that the Arabs will not follow a great man from Mecca or Taif [28:57 And they said: “If we follow the guidance with you, we will be deposed from our land.”]. Quraysh and its leaders were unable to confront Abraha’s army, and Taif was unable. The people of Mecca knew that this Qur’an for the worlds, so they thought that they could not bear the burden of the message, and that only a great power (such as Persia or the Romans) could carry it out. The interpretation of (from the two cities) as (from Mecca and Taif) has weakness, because the disbelievers of Quraysh knew in advance that God had chosen (from Mecca). The narrations were confused about identifying who the greats of Mecca and Taif were. Perhaps the interpretation of a great man from the two cities was influenced by the time of the two most powerful men in the world: Al-Qurashi Abd Al-Malik and Al-Thaqafi Al-Hajjaj.
If you had a time machine and went back to the time of the Quraysh when they said that, and you said to them, “Do you mean by the man of the two cities one of the leaders of Mecca or Taif?” They would have opened their mouths in astonishment, and they would have said to you, “Why do we follow a leader from Taif?” Do you think we fear Taif or consider them better than us? The two cities are the two greatest capitals of that time. It is as if the Quraysh today were saying, “If God had sent a messenger from Washington or Moscow.”
When I invited Professor Irfan Shahid to Chicago in 2006 to speak, I had asked him on this very topic on the origin of عيسى versus يسوع . He had told me that عيسى may have been derived from the Amharic language. I have no knowledge of Amharic. Is it possible that Amharic word was taken from the Greek? I am not connecting عيسى to the Aramaic language. Problematic in Arabic is that عيسى has no meaning since it is an arabized word. My final point is if the Quran had used يسوع in lieu of عيسى , it would have been faithful to the Aramaic origin.
Shouldn't عيسى، يحيى، مريم، موسى and هــٰرون come from the same source?
@kinanlaham744 Maybe and maybe not. There are a host of foreign loan words from a handful of languages. This is a fascinating area for research and continual studies.
@@sweiss Can you think of a possibility where عيسى comes from one source and مريم from a different source? The author of the Qur'an uses المسيح عيسى ابن مريم consistently. The same for موسى and هــٰرون، or even يحيى and زكريا. Also, notice the similarity between عيسى and موسى. It's almost impossible to believe these words didn't come from the same source.
@kinanlaham744 I am inclined to admit that عيسى was derived from the Greek language unlike مريم & موسى are derived from Aramaic. I believe studying the etymology of these proper nouns would help shed light for all.
@@sweiss Why would the author of the Qur'an derive عيسى from Greek, and مريم from Aramaic? Does that imply the author knew Arabic, Aramaic and Greek?
What is the best English translation of Quran? Abdullah Yusuf Ali gets a lot of pludits if one doesn't mind the archaic English. What about the The Study Quran?
Abdel Haleem or Mustafa Khattab
We have studied all over 100 translations of Quran, but Truth is: Not even one translation is without bends, twists, oversights, and tampering. Only one way to understand Quran correctly is: Learn Arabic and then understand Quran ONLY BY QURAN ONLY
@@GuideMeToTheRightPath
We have studied translations of Abdel Haleem and Mustafa Khattab. Believe me: they too have done a lot of tampering in their translations. *All, I mean all, translators tamper translation in order to RECONCILE their some unsound beliefs with Quran. This is the root cause*
Instead of changing themselves; they change the translation of Quran
@@abdar-rahman6965 "We have studied all over 100 translations of Quran, but Truth is: Not even one translation is without bends, twists, oversights, and tampering."
Can you give us the list of 100+ translations, so we can avoid them. Did you publish your study?
Allah calls to die for him, Christ calls to live for him !
Allah wants submission from all, Christ offers his love to all !
Allah says he is the best deceiver, Christ proclaims he is the Truth.
Allah curses those who dont believe him, Christ is patient with all.
What will happen to me if I never accept Jesus?
Concerning Subject of Crucifixion, Quran, Gospel of Luke and Gospel of John have same stand; all the three tell: Jesus was ALIVE even after the incident of Cross in same Injured Body. That means: he was not Crucified 4:157
The Quran never denied Jesus died, it only denies that the Jews crucified/killed him.
@@jammooly8917
Correct
Jesus was crucified and this is all fully explained in the Gospels. John Chapter 19 tells you how he died and then resurrected. In the Gospel of Matthew he said he will be killed and then raised on the third day. It's all over the New Testament. The Quran is irrelevant when it comes to Jesus and pretty much everything that has anything to do with God.
@@Christian_Girl19
Your own Bible Scholars say that your 4 Gospels are Anonymous books. *Can we classify a Anonymous Book as a reliable book?* No. For the sake of Argument, even Gospel of Luke and Gospel of John show that even after the incident of the Cross, Jesus was living with the same nailed Body, and he ate broiled Fish with the Disciples. That means: he did not die on the Cross=Not Crucified 4:157
When removed from Cross, he was in Coma. He was NEVER Resurrected but Resuscitated by Essene
@@Christian_Girl19
Your own Bible Scholars say that your 4 Gospels are Anonymous books. Can we classify a Anonymous Book as a reliable book? No.
Yeshua is a Hebrew name that translates to "Yahweh saves" or "Yahweh is salvation". Jesuit Pope Francis claims that the God of the Quran is the same as the Holy Bible. This confirms that the Jesuits are the order of the False Prophet/Isa in Revelation. I believe the Jesuit Order is scheming to bring about a Neo-Ottoman Empire.
The prophet Daniel and the Essenes predicted to the exact year when Messiah would come and that he would be crucified/"cut off". Jesus fulfilled hundreds of Messiah prophecies.
Daniel 9:26 & 27 explained by scripture:
John 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
Matthew 24:1-2 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
Hebrews 10:15 Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before,16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them; 17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more. 18 Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.
Genesis 22:8 And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Deuteronomy 21:22 And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree
1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
the quran clarifai that al masih was born and created with no men involved and his mother was not married
but in the bible they say that she was married to a man named yusuf when she had her son isa
what are you talking about
19:20
She wondered, “How can I have a son when no man has ever touched me, nor am I unchaste?”
4:157
and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, isa, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so.1 Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.
4:158
Rather, Allah raised him up to Himself. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise.
4:159
Every one of the People of the Book will definitely believe in him before his death.1 And on the Day of Judgment Jesus will be a witness against them.
Gabriel is going around in circles…
(1) Quran is not Divine word but written by Muhammad or a group of Arabs
(2) Muhammad or these group of Arabs were educated by some Jewish Rabbis or Christian Monks and this is how they got the material for the Quran .
(3) Muhammad or these group of writers got the name wrong
Ok they got the name wrong, they got the doctrine wrong (jesus is not God or Son of God or one of the Gods), instead they described him in the Quran as a monotheistic Prophet who advocates and declares the Unity of God ..
In addition he was not crucified and spoke when he was an infant to clear his mother who was a virgin (not married) of any wrong doing ..
This drives you to reflect whether Muhammad or the supposedly writers of the Quran had any conversations with any Rabbis or Monks.. why would they come with a story that is completely in contradiction with the bible when they should have literally translated it to Arabic …
Keep circling Gabriel but try to come with a consistent story …
Gabriel is biased and not honest to this topic
@@abdar-rahman6965 he is obsessed with the idea that Quran is derived from the bible but he cannot answer the basic question …
If I learned all these stories by listening to Jewish Rabbis (does not make sense because I do not speak Hebrew) or by listening to Christian monks/priests (mind you the gospels were not translated to Arabic then) why on earth, would I change the story line in these books and tell them as they are reported in the Quran …
I should copy - paste ..
The other problem he cannot address is .. If I wrote such a marvelous Arabic book, why would not I take credit for it … after all the poets of the time were respected among their tribes …
He just keep jumping every now and then to say .. this word is not Arabic, it is Syriac or Hebrew or Aramic and this story from the bible is mentioned in the Quran and does not say that the story in the Quran has nothing to do with the story in the bible in terms of creed, objective, style,…etc
@@husseinel-sayed64
Such people are Dishonest by DNA and God talks about such people in verse 7:179
The Messiah died and will not return to this life, as evidenced by the Qur’an.
Yes, the Messiah died like Muhammad, Moses, and others because he was human, and he will not return like others because he was human. This is the religion of the Christians who made the Messiah a god, but the Qur’an says that Messiah is a human being like others, and not god. So the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the human being, died and will not return. But the Muslims, I mean the foolish people of hadith, took this Christian religion without understanding and attributed it wrongly to the Messenger, and the poor Muslims swallowed it.
The Qur’an does not say that Jesus is alive or that he will return. This is something decided by the hadith scholars, not the Qur’an.
(Wafaat) indicates death and may be sleep. The death of Jesus was mentioned 'twice' in the Qur’an, and (Wafaat) here is death, not sleep.
There is no such thing as the second coming of Jesus in the Qur’an. It also contradicts the verse of the Seal of the Prophets, and Surah Al-Anbiyā’ verse No. 34, and Surah Āl-‘Imrān verse No. 185.
Remove from your heart the lie of the Church that Jesus will return and that he is alive, otherwise you will not understand the words of God, which have nothing to do with the lies of the hadiths and the Church.
Several hadiths disagree with you.
@@kinanlaham744 True Islam is the Qur’an.
@@SultanOP-lu5rr How do you understand Q4:159?
@@kinanlaham744 Instead of misinterpretation (believe in him), the fact is; (bihee/believe in [it]) refer to their false statement in the killing and crucifixion of the Messiah. As we go back to the context from the beginning [4:157 And their saying: “We have killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, messenger of God!”]. That is, they believe in the previous saying (We killed the Messiah).
The other thing; many commentators thought that (believe) here means belief (in the truth). But (belief) is not always in the truth, rather it may be in falsehood.
29:52 As for those who believe in falsehood and reject God, they are the losers. [Surah Al-‘Ankabūt]
29:67 Would they still believe in falsehood [Surah Al-‘Ankabūt]
34:41 Instead, they were worshiping the jinns; most of them were believers in them. [Surah Saba’]
Once we understand the word in BIHEE referring to what, we will understand the verse, and therefore we will understand the meaning of [4:159 he will be witness against them].
@@SultanOP-lu5rr "Instead of misinterpretation (believe in him),"
What makes you think "believe in him" a misinterpretation? It obviously does go against your understanding. If you're seeking the truth, you should follow the evidence even if you have to change your previous ideas.
---
"the fact is; (bihee/believe in [it]) refer to their false statement in the killing and crucifixion of the Messiah."
You clearly don't know Arabic. I asked you to provide the translation you used, but you ignored my request. I also presented plenty of translations to help you understand the meaning, not to mention the word by word translation.
--
"As we go back to the context from the beginning [4:157 And their saying: “We have killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, messenger of God!”]. That is, they believe in the previous saying (We killed the Messiah)
You keep trying to squeeze your own understanding, but it's not working. I speak Arabic and these verses are clear. Your understanding is wrong. You either concede, or insist to follow your falsehood.
@57:10 It is laughable that MA thinks that Arius didn't believe Jesus was the son of god. None other than the Emperor Constantine was baptized on his deathbed deathbed by the Arian Christian bishop Eusebius of Nicomedia in 337.
isa is "al Masih" and yeshua is "Messiah"
In order to find Truth; if you compare Quran with four Gospels; that is totally irrational. Quran is the last book of God protected by God 15:9, 17:88, 41:42. If you had compared Quran with Original Aramaic Gospel of Jesus (Injeel); then it could make sense, but when you compare Quran with FOUR ANONYMOUS Gospels; that does not make any sense. Not Our Mullahs and Imams but several top Bible Scholars have written that 4 Gospels are *anonymous books* and so far, no one knows who were authors of these 4 Anonymous books of folkloric mutually contradictory tales. Bible Scholars say that names of Mark Matthew Luke and John were randomly attached to these four anonymous books in the end of 2nd century.
Even these 4 Gospels are being tampered for Centuries. Gospels of today are different from Gospels of 4th Century
The word Injeel derives from εὐαγγέλιον, a Greek word because the gospels were written in Greek. The anslysis of the canonical gospels shows that the authors had an Aramaic background. Those of the apocriphal ones did not. Several episodes about the life of Isa were taken from these fake books. About fake books, according to the Quran, the Injeel was nit corrupted - who can corrupt God's word? "In their trail We sent forth Jesus son of Mary, confirming the Torah revealed before him; and We gave him the Gospel, in which there is guidance and light, corroborating what was revealed before him in the Torah: a guide and an admonition to the righteous. Let those who follow the Gospel judge by what God has revealed in it; ungodly are those that do not judge by what God has revealed."
But the gospels contain Jesus' hadiths: Allah gave to Isa a book about Isa. That is funny. 😂😂😂
عيسى
= Is.sah =
Jesa / Jesu = Jesus
*Quran is very clear about Jesus. Quran tells in 4:157 that Jesus was on Cross, but he survived death on Cross = NOT CRUCIFIED = Ma Salabuhu. Spiritually exalted 4:158. Lived over 100 years 5:110, and died naturally 5:116-116, **3:55**; and dead never come back*
What? No, Quran never says Jesus was on Cross. False.
In Q4:157, how do you translate و ما قتلوه و ما صلبوه
@@kinanlaham744
Translation 100% Correct, as under
They neither killed him (by extra-Crucifixion means) nor they killed him *ON THE CROSS=NOT CRUCIFIED*
Definition of Crucifixion in all new and old Arabic and English Lexicons is:
*_To kill a person_*_ after nailing him or binding him on the Cross_
So, DEATH on the Cross is a BINDING CONDITION of the Punishment, which is called Crucifixion. If the person is nailed on Cross, and he died on the Cross; then he is CRUCIFIED
But if a Person is nailed on the Cross, but he was removed from Cross in deeep coma, and later he was resuscitated; then the Right statement will be:
_Though Jesus' enemies tried to crucify him, but they failed in their Plan (Quran 3:54) and they failed to Crucify Jesus 4:157
ما صلبوه
Quran is the Truth of all truths
@@nuarootham1261
Quran never denies nailing of Jesus on Cross in 4:157, but Quran denies his Death on Cross, which means: *NOT CRUCIFIED=NOT DIED on Cross.* And History also shows: he was nailed on Cross and Quran cannot run against tons of Historical evidence
@@nuarootham1261
Verse 4:157's Word *SHUBBIHA=RESEMBLED a dead body* confirms 101% that* Jesus was INDEED on Cross, otherwise there is no any meaning of word Shubbiha in 4:157. But he was NOT CRUCIFIED=NOT DIED. Your knowledge is poor on this subject
Why you afraid of exploring Bible and pagans origin of Christianity.
“And Mary, the daughter of Imran, who protected her chastity, so We breathed into her of Our spirit(jesus's soul created by GOD), and she believed in the words of her Lord(divine pre-recording and divine decrees) and His books(divine laws), and she was of the obedient ones.”(66:12)
Her فرج means the opening of the garment, that is, the opening of the pocket of her armor(in the Arabic language), where the angel Gabriel, peace be upon him, breathed the spirit of Jesus, peace be upon him, which God Almighty created. What is meant here is not the private part, because the private part in the Arabic language, it is called (الحر); She guarded her فرج (the opening of her shirt) as a symbol of chastity and purity, and it is known that the angel Gabriel, peace be upon him, was the one who breathed the soul(of jesus)by the command of God Almighty,thereby God Almighty attributed this act to Himself, the great and the Most High, you see not only that you have to be endowed with Islamic knowledge but also the Arabic language, as I said the appropriate Arabic word for the private part either male or female is الحر , and also سوأة like in the Qur’an in chapter 7 when Satan tried and succeeded in deceiving Adam and Eve and he got them naked and they starded to cover their private parts with leaves of Paradise but the word فرج has several meanings depending on the context like in the Qur’an
"وَالَّذِينَ هُمْ لِفُرُوجِهِمْ حَافِظُونَ"
"والتي أحصنت فرجها فنفخنا فيه من روحنا و صدقت بكلمات ربها و رسله و كانت من القانتين"
Here the context is clear they keep their chastity and they avoid adultery, fornication and lewdness and they only marry.
take my advice my friend and go and learn Arabic well before you make any judgment.
Dear Dr. Reynolds, I have a theory concerning the name isa عيسى and its origins. In thd Bible we all know the story of Jacob and his older twin brother Esau and Jacob. We all know that thd jews despise the name Esau which in Arabic wS translated to Esauo عيسو
Also we know the influence of the jews on creating thd kuran where most of if is dedicated to the Jewish Talmoud stories!!!
Hence, thd missing name of Palestine and the clear call to thd jews to return to their promised homeland.
We also are aware of the remaining Jews that did not believe in Lord Jesus Christ, called him other names like ישו i.e., ימח שמו וזכרו meaning let his name be deleted. And thd translations of this name and thd other hated character Esau into the Arabic name عيسى.
Though some dictionaries say the isa عيسى is the bull seamen. Which if was true! Was taken as mockery. And mocking thd opponents is an exclusive Islamic trend
See Abu elhakam was call abu jahl ابو الحكم الى ابو جهل and the supposed period before Isalm as الجاهلية. The era of ignorance. While all indications show us that thd said era was the era of openness, tolerance and acceptance of thd others while islam has and still is for eradicating thd others. And the muslims are on the required track ti achieving that.
The trinity is three gods.
Search for the Gospel of Barnabas. True Christianity is closer to Judaism. Jesus was applying Jewish law, just like the early Christians.
You mean the Barnabas book that was authored at the most during the 15th century?
Also you mean the Barnabas book that implied Jews were foolish for taking their food laws literally?
The New Testament also claims Mosaic food laws are no longer required by God but it doesn't claim the Jews were wrong obeying them literally before the Messiah came.
@@youngknowledgeseeker you mean the same New Testament that claim, after the resurrection, the dead bodies came out of the tombs and went to the holy city?
@@youngknowledgeseeker No, that's the EPISTLE of Barnabas, a genuine ancient document, regardless of whether it was written by Barnabas or not. The GOSPEL of Barnabas is a medieval Muslim fraud that litereally nobody worth their salt takes seriously.
The gospel of Barnabas is a forgery. Bible scholars and top Muslim scholars has also called it forgery
God has named all True Followers of all Prophets "Al-MUSLIMS" (Quran 22:78). Know that word Al-Muslim is a PROPER NOUN
Messiah will come soon inshallah he is isa son of Mary
Exactly, so repent and stop doing polytheistic rituals like praying 5 times a day, throwing rocks etc etc...
Messiah is naturally dead in Quran, and dead do not come back. Do not follow Fictions
islam is stone cult insanity
Arabic word AHSANAT FARJAHA is used for Mary in 21:91 and 66:12 and the meaning of this word is CHASTE WIFE = *A woman who marries to a Man in order to FORTIFY her Chastity.* Nowhere Quran supports the fable of Virgin Birth, nor it exists in ancient copies of 4 Gospels. Quran also talks about NOT CHILD but about CHILDREN of Mary in verse 3:36. Early followers of Jesus "Ebionites" believed that Jesus was a biological son of Mary and Jesus. Quran tells that all humans are from Dust and Sperm and baby takes birth only when male and female involve in sexual union
The only True Jesus is the Jesus of the new testament!! Which is the historical Jesus by the eye witness.
Really. Let's go with that. The Jesus of the New Testament is the real Jesus. The Christian FAITH made a L-I-A-R of Jesus of the New Testament.
Nafakhna Ruhana:
Quran tells that God breathes his spirit in every womb before the birth of any Human. So that is not limited only to Mary. People do not read whole Quran. They take just one verses out of Quran and then misinterpret is as they wish. According to Quran every human is Ruh-Allah = Spirit of God
In what years (time period) did Muhammad think that Jesus lived?
We have no idea because neither the koran, nor the hadith give us any clues on that.
I do find it amazing that the writers of the koran were absolutely oblivious to the existence of the ancient Roman Empire as well as the New Rome.
What makes you say that?
@JohnGeometresMaximos well let's just assume the 30th surah of quran doesn't exist yeah. It is even called Ar-rum talking about Romans and the prophet and companion were very much aware of the Romans their culture and some language read about a companion by the name suhayb ar-rumi
@@shaks1903
What does the koran say about the Orthodox New Rome? List all the details.
@@JohnGeometresMaximosGod in the Quran is primarily speaking to desert bedouin Arabs, so not finding detailed explanations about Catholicism or Judaism or Stoicism or Philosophy shouldn't be surprising.
We have watched your this video fully. It clearly, very clearly appears that either your approach to this topic is very poor due to lack of information on this subject, or you are highly biased
Surah An-Nisā’, verse No. 159. It simply means that the People of the Scripture (both Jews and Christians) will continue to believe in the crucifixion of the Messiah during his life, but on the Day of Resurrection, he will know that he was wrong.
(Wa im min Ahlil Kitaabi): = None from the People of the Book, neither a Jew nor a Christian.
(illaa): = only.
(layu’minanna bihee): = To believe in the killing and crucifixion of the Messiah = he can believe in the crucifixion as much as he wants.
(qabla mawtihee): = Before the death of this Jew or Christian = during his life.
Note the importance of the word (illaa) = only/except, as it serves to define and limit the time period in which a Jew or a Christian person - and only in it - can embrace belief in the crucifixion and killing of the Messiah.
The verse simply says: There is no one among the People of the Book except that his belief in the killing and crucifixion of Jesus, occurred during his earthly life (that is, belief in crucifixion only occurred during his worldly life, but if death came or after it, there would be no belief in crucifixion).
Belief (in the killing and crucifixion of Jesus) will not be embraced by any Jew or Christian except in his worldly life only. As for the afterlife, everyone who believed in the killing and crucifixion of Jesus will leave this idea and abandon that belief. Because every Jew and every Christian will know on the Day of Resurrection that Jesus was not killed or crucified [16:39 and so those who have disbelieved may know that they were liars., Surah An-Nahl]. And because Jesus himself (on the Day of Resurrection) will bear witness against them [4:159 And on the Day of Resurrection he will be against them a witness., Surah An-Nisā’] that he was not killed or crucified. How can the People of the Book on the Day of Resurrection say to Jesus: You were killed and crucified? While Jesus himself will bear witness on the Day of Resurrection against their saying [And on the Day of Resurrection he will be a witness against them], so he will say to them the opposite of their saying: They did not kill me and they did not crucify me.
Still, the Jews today in their core beliefs holding the idea; speaking ill about Mary and Jesus and brag about killing Jesus. While the poor Christians still adhere to the myth of the crucifixion and the divinity of Jesus. No matter how much you try to make them understand that these are lies, they will most likely not accept you because of the length of time that has entrenched these lies in their hearts.
There is no specialization in the Qur’an because it is for everyone. God made it simple and easy for everyone to understand. You yourself can study the Qur’an and understand it and God will teach you. And those who say specialization are the ones who want to control you, they are the priesthood who want you to worship them and obey them, so they convinced you that you are not Specialize in the fact that you are an ignorant, silly man. As the priests of the church did with the Christians.
This noble verse contains great profound wisdom. The verse talks about a specific example, which is the belief of the People of the Book in the killing and crucifixion of Jesus, which was invalidated by the Qur’an. The noble verse teaches us, through this example, an important and dangerous matter that includes every superstitious faith. It is that any belief in falsehood will not last with its adherent except as long as he is alive. A lie only exists in the mind and heart of its perpetrator, so if he dies, his lie dies with him. If a person believes that his Lord is an idol or a sun, or that God does not exist, or believes in words or believes in any lie, then this faith has a short rope, and the maximum length of this rope is the life of this person. If you believe in a truth and then die, the truth will not die with your death, because the existence of the truth is not related to your existence. But if you believe in an imagination, this imagination will not live and live except in you and through you. If you die, your imagination will die with you. The verse advises us all, through the example of the People of the Book, not to live a sweet, delicious lie because it will die with our death.
Write the translation you used for Q4:159, or give it's reference.
Here is a list of different translations for you:
Fadel Soliman
Surely, there is none from the People of the Scripture but will believe in him[[Jesus.]]before his death, and on the Day of Resurrection he will be a witness against them.
Mufti Taqi Usmani
No one will remain from among the People of the Book but will certainly believe in him before he dies, and on the Day of Doom, he shall be a witness against them.
Mohammed Marmaduke William Pickthall
There is not one of the People of the Scripture but will believe in him before his death, and on the Day of Resurrection he will be a witness against them -
Sahih International
And there is none from the People of the Scripture but that he will surely believe in him [i.e., Jesus] before his death.[[One interpretation is that his death refers to that of Jesus after his return to earth. Or it can mean the death of every individual from among the People of the Scripture.]] And on the Day of Resurrection he will be against them a witness.
Yusuf Ali
And there is none of the People of the Book but must believe in him before his death; and on the Day of Judgment he will be a witness against them;-
Abdul Haleem
There is not one of the People of the Book who will not believe in [Jesus] before his death, and on the Day of Resurrection he will be a witness against them.)
Dr. Mustafa Khattab
Every one of the People of the Book will definitely believe in him before his death. And on the Day of Judgment Jesus will be a witness against them.
Muhsin Khan and Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali
And there is none of the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), but must believe in him ['Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), as only a Messenger of Allah and a human being], before his ['Iesa (Jesus) or a Jew's or a Christian's] death (at the time of the appearance of the angel of death). And on the Day of Resurrection, he ['Iesa (Jesus)] will be a witness against them.
Here's a word for word translation:
corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=4&verse=159
Brother you should share more of your content, it rings with logic, being a former Christian and believing in the 2nd coming before my Islam and then after, but upon contemplation, I begin to realize that that whole doctrine of the second coming was in fact interjected into the teachings of Jesus by none other than Paul and sanctified by St. John, the writer of Revelations, seeing that the earliest sects in Islam also don't believe in a 2nd coming( Ìbaadiyah) and there are reports that Ibn Abbas and Imam Malik both considered Jesus to have already died,
@@richardanthony3267 Ibn Abbas and Imam Malik both believed in the second coming of Jesus.
Quran does not contain only verse 4:157. Quran also contains others over 6000 verses. Though Jesus did not die ON THE CROSS 4:157 but after a long life over 100 year (5110 Kahlan) Jesus died naturally 5:117, 3:55 and dead never come back 23:99-100
Thanks God for Islam ❤❤❤❤
The Quran told his name is Isa عيسي... And that is it, we believe the Quran 😊😊😊
Ya if ur God is such that u can not believe the possibility of christian sources and also of the many stuff that happen u everyday in the name of ur God ,but u can believe a merchant in Arabia got visited by an angel and he was the last prophet ? Why shud one believe his interpretations , Qur'an callsnjeuss the word of God ,and muhammad just bought a message doesn't mean he knows what the word means in action. As the Qur'an says Jesus is called the word of God and that means u need to know what Jesus historically was and lived not ur prophet. So interpret ur Qur'an through the identity of Jesus insted of ur fleshly prophet who seems have some serious narcissistic problem like Paul had, corrupting the nature and guidance of Jesus. He only recieved it if he recieved out of grace that's it but Jesus is the real deal and his nature is through which ur Qur'an needs to be interpreted. He is above all other prophets and he is the mesisha and also he was not begotten of flesh of a man but through the breath of God.
@@ashishmantri3684bro why would take a lesson of Islam history from it's enemies and islamaphobes back in the day... That's like taking trump's history from bidens advisors!!?😂it's non sensical!
@@aalileghari6195 why wud one take a history lesson of how he died from ones who come after the event in a place near to where he was born in the middlest where already many stories are floating and in a place ,medina where there were already Jews living ? It doesn't take a genius to say that many of them came from christian and jewish jewish scribes and sects like ishmaelites and etc monotheits who are already praying to a God called al-ilah the father amongst the other gods. I mean comon I don't believe Jesus rose up and stuff but if one has understand gods will my conscience tells me to believe in the words of the man Jesus and his ideas coz atleast they are humane and filled with sacrifice. So fiction is good ,but the better fiction needs to run us ,not the barbaric warrior like religion
Apart from Noble Quran; there is solid historical evidence which shows that real name of Jesus was Isa
It is written in over 2000 old book of Hindus Puranas that Jesus met to King of their time and King Shaliwahana asked Jesus: Man: what is your name: He answered: my name is Isa
*TO SUMP UP:*
*Man: your knowledge on this subject cannot be rated more than 2/10. You know nothing on this subject. Mere gossiping like an immature child. If you believe in Rationality and Truth, we are ready for debate. Your video is thumbed down*
abdar-rahman said "TO SUMP UP" Are you Saudi? ... are you referring to an oil sump? your comment 0/10 bwa ha ha ha ha ha
AS IN THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY: JESUS BEGOTTEN BY THE FATHER - DID HE BEGET HIMSELF ?
This question has puzzled many Christian theologians and scholars for centuries !
The Doctrine of the Trinity, which describes God as a unity of three distinct persons - the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit - is central to Christian Theology.
The idea of Jesus being "begotten" by the Father refers to his divine nature and origin, as described in the Bible (eisegete by the early Church Fathers from the Jewish Torah/Tanakh Psalm 2: v7, and in the Christian New Testament Acts 13: v33 by Saul/Paul of Tarsus.
The question of whether Jesus "begot himself" is a trinitarian philosophical and theological conundrum: and arguments against this idea include:
1. The Father-Son relationship implies a distinction between the two persons of similar sexual identity, making begetting impossible.
2. The Trinity is a unity of Co-equal and Co-eternal persons, not a hierarchical structure where one person could beget another.
3. The Concept of Begetting implies sexual acts, a temporal or causal relationship, which doesn't apply to the Eternal and Timeless Nature of God.
Scholars and theologians have grappled with these paradoxes, offering various interpretations and solutions.
Some emphasize the mystery and incomprehensibility of the Trinity, while others propose philosophical frameworks to address these questions. For 2000 years the concept of the Trinity still remains a deeply unsettled debate among Christians themselves.
There is no Trinity ... you describing a God with Multiple personality , God is one Jesus is a person like any other he is not A God you are reading from a bible that was written 1000 years after Jesus anyone could've manipulated it and change it instead of the word God they put the word father instead to mess with your head , God created two trillion Galaxies Jesus didn't even build his own home he inherited it from his mother , If Jesus is your God do you think he is going to stand there and let people put him on a cross ?? A God will never let anyone touch him or hurt him the whole idea makes no sense it is all made up stories by the Jews that hated Jesus ...
As a Christian why should we trust the Qur'an from a seventh century not by eyewitnesses compared to early witnesses in the bible
The same reason why you follow the NT and the Jews don’t. It’s a pattern…
There are no rational reasons to believe in a book from 7th century with no piece of evidence that ever existed. Its blind faith in purest form
@@She_iswise The same can said about the mormons, you do understand it's a fallacy, right? The early Church was jewish, ergo, the NT was written by the jews, - which jews were right? We compare the theology: we're on an equal footing - that religion which is consistent with the previous revelation is the true one. All this would have been explained to Muhammad if he had come to the Church in the 7th century
@@panarioninpatria282 Deuteronomy 18:18
18 I will raise them up 👉 a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and
👉 will put my words in his mouth; and he shall 👉 speak unto them all that I shall command him.
John 16:12-13
12 “I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13 But when he, the 👉 Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. 👉 He will not speak on his own; 👉 he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.
@@She_iswiseWhere does the New Testament rewrite events narrated in the Old Testament?
Jesus gave me the eternal gospel song we practice in diverse languages one is Arabic and He gave me a lot of new names from all languages too. some muslim names and we were singing it in their language. i cant even sing its like the Kings speech movie angels training me. He was bragging on me being a bigger better true mightier prophet than Mohammed,
all i can do is say yes sir Lord you did it
The gospel of Jesus (Injeel) was lost after his natural death. YOUR OWN bible Scholars say that your 4 Gospels are *ANONYMOUS Books.* Will a man build his faith on Anonymous books who have a healthy brain in his head?
Nowhere, Quranic verse 4:157 tells that Jesus was replaced on the Cross. Quran uses frequently word TABDEELA for change or replacement. But in 4:157, Quran has used word SHUBBIHA=RESEMBLES. And this resemblance is pointing toward a Man in Coma who resembles a Dead body. So Quran is telling that ON CROSS, due to being in DEEP COMA, Body of Jesus RESEMBLES=SHUBBIHA a dead body but his body was not dead, so he was nor crucified because death on Cross is a Binding Condition of the punishment which is called Crucifixion. See Definition of Crucifixion Please.
Fable of Substitution on Cross was INDEED sprouted from Gnostic Groups. When in 7th century, they embraced Islam, they spread fable of Substitution among Muslims and then that tale was infused in Books of Hadiths.
Resemblance means somebody been replaced for Jesus having the same face and voice. You can understand it if you read the gospel of Barnabas having judas iscariot'S face and voice being changed by God to resemble them like that of Jesus's.
The formulation in the Quran says he was neither killed nor crucified. If crucifixion implies death that means that its redundant on the Quran that he was neither killed nor crucified.
@@MrLosches
I have already posted tons of comments on this subject under this video. Please refer to those comments - thanks
@@MrLosches
*"neither killed nor crucified"*
When along with _"neither killed"_ is mentioned also _"nor Crucified";_ that means: He was neither killed by any Extra-Crucifixion method (like stabbing, with sword etc.) nor he was *KILLED ON CROSS=CRUCIFIXION.*
*_All English and Ancient Arabic Lexicons show and even Quran in Surah 12 shows that death on Cross is the binding condition of the punishment, which is known as "Crucifixion". If a Person dies on the Cross, he is crucified, but if he survives; he is not crucified._*
Along with killing; Quran has especially mentioned also *"killing on Cross=Crucifixion"* because It was plan of enemies of Jesus to give him a CURSED DEATH ON CROSS because their Book Deuteronomy 21:22-23 shows that a person who dies on Cross, is cursed. Quran tells in 3:54, but God disabled their plan, and they failed to give him that cursed death which they intended. Instead, God exalted him on to Himself (Quarn 4:158)
@@PedroJrArceno
When anything is changed/replaced; for such occasion, Quran has used word TABDEELA frequently. But in verse 4:157, the word SHUBBIHA=Resembled is used. Resembled NEVER MEAN to replace. You are on the wrong side. For example: consider that your facial features are like my facial features. That means: your face resembles my face. It never means: that your face is replaced by my face
isa = Yesua
ishaq= Yishaq
ismail= Yishmail
jews use "y" .. arab use "i"
This is very wrong, Isa in Quranic Arabic is spelled عيسى, so with 'ayn and not an alef with kasra like اسماعيل or اسحاق. So that argumentation is wrong.
So, Yesua = Isua? and not Isa or Iesa
arabs have no rational epxlanations
@@IbrahimAlloush1 Yeshua = Jesus is worst transliteration
@@roshlew6994 Yeshua = Jesus is worst transliteration
The islam education passed by Allah for All the Prophets thier early education from Adhem as till the last time on the prophet Mohammad saw as called by the Allah by the name of muslims from Adhem Nouh as ibrahiem as and Moses Essa as all the prophets same education The education of islam revealed slowly slowly on the different nations for the need with regularly on prophets .Moses as tourah revealed for bani israiel all the old islamic constitutions orders were for the moses ummah .But the completion of the Holy Quran education revealed on Mohammad saw .which history or predictions were informed for past present and futuer .The Quran revealed in the certification of all of books illhami because Hazrat Mohammad saw certified all the prophets nabyyet truthfull poiuce nobeles and they sacrificed thier lives in the path of Allah .So if any masieh or Maidi will appointed for incoming time last eara he cannot crossed the critera of anhazrat saw of Revealed book Quran He will came to cover himself in the education under the book of Quran and Mohammad saw uswah husna .so the Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian like Masieh Essa as came or appointed for called the peoples himself Dawah for the Maidi and Masieh the Maihdi and Masieh both words same meanings my Haddyet yafta Nabi .in the last eara called for the forteenth century .jazakallah i hoe you satisfied from this small comments
This is the nonsense claim from the islamic theology which makes no sense at all
Well Aisha was only 6
Rebecca was only 3. 😂
This was debunked already
@@Nous98
No it wasn't. Your scriptures are saying the same that she was 6.
So what ?
yes, ribkha is 3 years old
New tactic of missionaries. Instead of focusing on Onenesss of God they are banking on trivial issues. Like the name of jesus etc. The main discussion should be trinity vs Monotheism. Current Christianity is a version of Roman paganism
Cry more. You don't have to focus on one topic. If you want to talk about oness then make your own videos.
@@MrLosches Crying is part of those who beleive in crucifixion. Monotheism is happiness and satisfaction. It is absolutely clear from your reply that you dont want to talk about the Oneness of God. What a shame
Jesus & Muhammad preached Monotheism, obey the commandments & sincere repentance. pagan church & Paul preached Trinity, law is finished & pagan divine sacrifice. Choice is urs
For Muslims and Christians, here are the actual differences between our books and scriptures, the New Testament and the Quran (before you read, please note, they both agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God) -
1) - The New Testament is clear that Jesus is God's son, one with a child-father relationship with him. Not only that but the entire Bible has no problem calling different creations his "children" (Angels, Israel, Christians, Adam). None of these mean biological child, of course that's impossible, God is one and has no wife. However, this never stopped Moses, the prophets, Jesus, or God from using "son" and "child" terminology. In Jesus case, "son" has two meanings. The King of Israel was titled "son of God" (Psalm 2:7, John 1:49). Jesus was of course the "son of David", the promised special Anointed heir to the throne. Secondly, Jesus had a special origin, a unique begetting, and one-of-a-kind birth. No human originator, it was God alone who started his life in his Mother Mary's womb. Therefore, according to Luke and Matthew, God was his father, not Joseph (Luke 1:35). The last human being with a similar miraculous direct origin from God that did not require the union of a man and woman was Adam, also called "son of God" for that reason (Luke 3:38). For us Christians, the author of one of our holy books "1st John" tells us to listen to those who confess Jesus as the son of God and that the one who confesses this has God with him (1st John 4:15).
- The Quran seems to deny that Jesus is the son of God or even forbids calling him or anyone else sons of God.
2) - The New Testament completely teaches that Jesus died (and that God brought him back to life, but now immortal life along with new incredible power and authority). Not only does it teach that Jesus had suffered and died, but that it was part of Gods plan and that it's necessary to believe this happened to both please and obey God faithfully.
- From what I am told, the Quran teaches he only appeared to die.
3) - The New Testament message from God through Jesus was not some vague message of "turn back to God" or to simply "submit to God", instead it was the urgent announcement of the desired yet looming coming of "the Kingdom of God" to the earth. The time when God would fulfill his promises he had made through the prophets to Israel [and the world] over the centuries.
- Promises of world peace - Isaiah 2:4,
- World-Wide knowledge of God - Habakkuk 2:14,
- Resurrection of the Dead - Daniel 12:2,
- Immortal life and re-access to the tree of life in Eden- Daniel 12:2 Revelation 2:7,
- Freedom of Israel and Gods people - Isaiah 54, Acts 1:6-7
- Possession of the Earth by Gods people - Daniel 7:13-18 Matthew 5:5,
- Royal authority given to God's people over the earth and the Nations - Daniel 7:18 Isaiah 45:14 Isaiah 60:14 Revelation 3:21 Matthew 19:28 1st Corinthians 6:2-3,
- Gods restored Eden-like presence on the earth - Revelation 21:3;22,
All accomplished through the mighty empowered Messiah-King of God. *This* was what Jesus was sent to preach (Luke 4:43, Mark 1:14-15), that this time is ready to happen so get prepared because the King of that Kingdom (Jesus) had been born and is giving instructions on who he and God will let into this Kingdom and give positions of authority/power to! No teaching on going to heaven or having a soul that lives on after death and goes to heaven playing a harp, it was about fixing and restoring the earth in resurrected, glorified and immortal bodies. Being given so much authority by God that you will even "judge Angels" (1st Corinthians 6:2-3).
- The Quran, as far as I have been told, doesn't teach about this message and doesn't prepare anyone on how to be accepted into it.
4) - The New Testament authors wrote that Jesus, and God, had been teaching steadfast enduring non-violence while preaching this message as a requirement to follow him and be accepted by him. Most assuredly lethal violence was forbidden. His followers were to "love their enemies" and to "not repay evil with evil" to not "[violently] resist the evil-doer". We are told to wait for God to give vengeance only, whether on judgement day or before then, and to pray for our enemies to repent and so be spared the vengeance.
- The Quran allows for justice in the form of physical consequences, even lethal violence, even on a formal judicial level.
5) - The New Testament is very clear, many of the laws concerning the flesh that God gave to Israel are not concerns or commands of God right now. Circumcision, Mosaic dietary regulations (food laws), temple rituals and observance regarding clean and unclean, and Mosaic holy day observations are not any commands of his for the world right now and do not contribute to your acceptance or rejection from the coming age of the Kingdom of God. Only obeying or disobeying the commands of his holy Messiah will affect whether he accepts or rejects you from the coming Kingdom and life.
- The Quran teaches that God does care about food laws, holy days, and pilgrimages.
-------------------------------
- These are the real differences between our scriptures, not the nonsense about the Trinity or God becoming a man, things both of our books never ever talk about or teach. However, what is written above *should* be what we talk about with each other, with respect and love, in order to get to the bottom of what's going on between our two faiths and our two prophets, because if I may be honest it does seem like they may be teaching two different things.
Now, if I have misrepresented Islam or the Quran, please correct me and I will edit my post to make it more accurate.
Thank you for reading, whoever read this far. [And if anyone wants to learn more please search "Biblical Unitarian" on Google or youtube. "Anthony Buzzard" and "Carlos Xavier" and "J Dan Gill" on "Focusonthekingdom", "thehumanjesus", or "21stonegod" youtube channels and websites are quite prolific and educated voices about these subjects.
Am I right to think you might be called "heretic" because of this line: "(before you read, please note, they both agree there is no Trinity however and that Jesus is not God)"?
This is just a modern Christian view. All Christians in history disagree with you.
The biblical Jesus says that kids have to be taken out who disrespect their parents.
How can you claim non violence?
The biblical Jesus condoned Roman pagan law. ‘render unto Caesar what’s Caesar.’
You can compare Moses and Jesus in the bible. Moses stood up against the Pharao. The biblical Jesus endorses Caesar.
You can’t claim non violence if the biblical Jesus teaches to follow Roman pagan law to run society.
You wrong about the Quran demanding violence it doesn’t Quran demands justice and there is a lot of mercy and compassion Jesus and Mohamed message is pretty much the same the Quran says all prophets are teaching same message to worship the one and only creator of the universe /heavens and to live righteous life the Quran should be read as it demands it self contextually.
@@kinanlaham744Heretic by the church councils of the 4th century and everyone who believed in them up until now, sure, yes, a major heretic.
But by Jesus as described and found in the New Testament, as well as his faithful followers (or their followers who also helped write part of the New Testament), and Paul, no, not in the slightest.
Not to ramble on, but they were desperate to get people to believe Jesus was God's Messiah, which means his Anointed King who descended from David, who was epitheted "God's son" from God's declaration in Psalm 2:7 to David, to describe the kind of relationship God would have with the King (not an uncommon epithet for a King towards a higher King or God in the ancient near east at the time of David anyways).
I think the Apostles could have never even dreamed of how inconceivably incorrect we read their simple and plain statements like "There is only one God, the Father...and there is only one Lord (Human King) Jesus Christ" 1 Corinthians 8:6 - Paul
Or
"There is [only] one God, and [there is only] one mediator between God and man, the man [himself] Christ Jesus."
You're right about some things you wrote there, but some books in the NT absolutely teach that Jesus is equal to the Father. Revelation, John and Hebrews make any other reading impossible, and the doctrine of the Trinity was a natural formulation from there. Whether they ignored parts with lesser Christology when formulating it (I don't presuppose biblical harmony between authors, since I'm not a believer) is not very relevant. There were INDEED authors who believed Jesus was either God from eternity past, or that held a bizarre belief in which God violated his own laws about not giving anybody else his glory, Name, etc, and gave it to a creature (this also links into beliefs of the time and afterward - e.g. Metatron, Yahoel, etc, about whom the Angel of the LORD, whose inseparable relationship with the LORD himself is made clear in Exodus 23 and many other verses), but since this wasn't possible, this possibly mystical weird idea died out, and it had to be harmonized with the eternity of a single God, added to that a bunch of Greco-Roman philosophical concepts that when applied to Jewish theology left this as the only conclusion. Therefore, given this background you only had two choices once you accepted the basic canon: polytheism or Trinity - or "Binity" if we focus only on Jesus but anyway the point is the church fathers really had no choice in concluding otherwise, in order to harmonize the biblical monotheism of Second Isaiah and others, with the affirmations made about the Angel of the LORD and the descriptions of Jesus several times by N.T. authors.
The Origin of Islam
ua-cam.com/play/PL1zJ2LUq92EkBQpJlVHK2vb7YigCcmzP7.html&si=LyimGs6g4Mij7NnH
Let's understand the history first, before you believe a story. Accept criticism with an open mind, then you can have a good judgment.