@@JustJake0903 mate your stadium attendences are so low plus the crowd only makes noise when a goal goes in, there is no atmosphere and you can always hear the opposition fans in the lfc V city game all I hear was city chants until you guys scores your team is quiet
It s no surprise the EPL ones involve Michael Oliver. One of the worst referees in EPL history. He tried to make the game about him rather than the football.
Bowen's disallowed goal vs Chelsea when he scraped the top of his boot over Mendy's arm when jumping over him is by far the worst I've seen when West Ham's involved.
In Germany's Bundesliga there was a match where the ref took half of the halftimebreak to evaluate VAR, then had both teams enter the pitch mid halftimebreak to perform the penalty he gave after reviewing VAR and after that sent them back to continue the break. According ot experts this was within the rules as written, but at the same time everybody watching it just knew this was wrong.
Yeah, it was a penalty to Portugal and Griezeman was offside, Kane was booked so VAR could not intervene whereas the ref took no action for Christies lunge on Saka today.
Even though there was an offside decision before Pickford took out Van Dyck, the referee could have booked/sent off Pickford or dangerous conduct and overruled VAR. Let's say Pickford had deliberately punched Van Dyck, do you think the ref would have done nothing because there was an offside decision?
Never a red, it is just a follow through from his kick. Looks bad because of where the foot ended up. Not dangerous, maybe a little painful but an accident. Common sense to not give a red there.
@@Just_lucid_edits There was no intention to have studs landing on the back of the opposing players legs. Some times accidents happen in sport and players should not punished for what is just bad luck.
Referee of 10 years now... I figured I'd make this comment to explain most of these calls, since people have a tendency to favor their opinions rather than the rules. Whoever wrote and approved the script for this really needs to learn the Laws Of The Game (LOTG) and also work on their wording. Also, I'd like to mention that I do not necessarily "agree" with the way the systems work but, in situations where rules exist for a sport, they must be upheld 100% of the way and I am simply explaining them. Some of these were good. Some were not. Let's touch on every call in this video and see which ones were correct and which were incorrect: 1. Robert Jones red. You showed the cleats on an almost straight-legged tackle catch Bissouma in the shin, with force. You can argue it's the ankle which receives some "leniency" from fans (why is beyond me). But the nature of this tackle is both reckless and dangerous. The force used was not negligible. No question about it being a red card. 2. Diaz offside goal. This is clearly an error. It was apologized publicly for. The audio for it was released. No matter who say sit, it's a true error. It was not "clear and obvious" but that does not matter for offsides in the EPL with their use of the lines (so saying it's "obvious" literally means nothing). 3. Pickford tackle on Virgil van Dijk. This one is a matter of understanding the LOTG. Pickford caught van Dijk. Correct. The player he "fouled" was offside, meaning the foul cannot be given. Correct. In that case, what is the red card supposed to be for? If the foul was given, it can be a no card, a yellow card for Unsporting Behavior, or a red card for Serious Foul Play. But with no foul given, the only argument to have is this is Violent Conduct. Here is the Violent Conduct wording: "Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made. In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible." Because he DID challenge for the ball, Violent Conduct is rules out. No card can be given. Very simple. It is very unfortunately to see players get injured, regardless of how. But we do not change the rules subjectively or situationally. Also from the LOTG: "In situations where an offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalized as it has occurred before the foul challenge". 4. Rodri handball. This is a tough one to argue in either way. The review for a handball has to be "clear and obvious" from a replay. In football (soccer), the LOTG states: "For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit". There is a diagram online that shows that is not considered for handball is the part that is covered by the sleeve (on a short sleeve shirt). No videos or images that you showed the ball strike below the sleeve of Rodri and in fact, every single video and image show it making contact with the sleeve at least halfway. This is the definition of NOT clear and obvious handling. No handball. 5. Sheffield goal denied. Firstly, this should not be in the video as this has nothing to do with VAR. Yes, this was something that unfortunately occurred and camera angles were there to prove it should have been given. As you mentioned, there was a malfunction with the technology occurred. In the EPL, the use of Goal Line Technology is used, not VAR. They technically cannot intervene to change anything. The best that we can hope for is the Assistant Referee has a clear angle that allows them to call the goal (if they're even allowed to at this point in the EPL) and then play gets stopped to award the goal. I doubt this would happen though because the Goal Line Technology would've been initially used to "disprove" the AR's call. Ultimately, this is extremely unfortunate and I personally hope they can create a method of preventing this in the future. 6. Red card for Balbuena. Balbuena definitely did not mean to stamp onto the leg of Chilwell. Intention is not assessed by referees. We simply look at the facts. Was the a stamp onto the leg? Yes. Was is negligible force? According to the referees and honestly anyone who has a working set of eyes, that's a pretty hard step onto the leg. As I mentioned previously, we do not change the rules subjectively or situationally. It's a red card. 7. Iran penalty. This one I can agree with the protests about. The distance from the ball was very small. The player's arm was in what I personally think is a natural position. In today's world, that wouldn't be given as a penalty. I don't believe the 2018 LOTG rules had any different things stated about handball. Unless they deemed the arm to be in an unnatural position, this appears to be a blunder. 8. Mitoma penalty controversy. This one seems to be a blunder as well (see, I can admit when something seems wrong). Initially it looks like Hojbjerg had a possible touch on the ball. The angle from the players' front (if you watch the slightly longer clip) does not show a clear touch or lack of a touch on the ball. If you slow it down, it appears like there may have been a VERY SLIGHT touch, though I'll be honest that I don't believe there was. In this case, VAR is looking to disprove a no-penalty which would mean clear and obvious no touch by the defender. They couldn't, so the call will stand as is. Personally I believe that this should have been because I don't believe there was a touch by the defender but I also fall into that "subjectively or situationally" category. 9. Kane no red card. First off, do not use the word "intent". Players, fans, and officials cannot truly know intent and cannot base decisions on intent. Now, in terms of the tackle... it is definitely a high boot, studs up, fast and aggressive challenge. I can agree that this should be a red card. The minimal contact made may have saved him in this case but I do believe that in any logical situation, a player would rather avoid getting hit by that than to suffer a potential injury. 10. Estupinan offsides. The lines do not lie. Are they in the right place? That's up to your opinion but I do think they may have put the lines on the wrong defender. As long as they checked both defenders with the lines to determine who was further, they're justified. I believe this one was also addressed in some form publicly. In the end, a better angle would've helped a lot, though. 11. Handball penalty call against Newcastle. A deflection off the side of a player from such a close proximity, into the elbow of their arm in a natural position of the elbow, should not be called a handball. This one was a shocker. 12. Handball against Uruguay. I'm not sure why this was deemed "unnaturally" positioned. A player sliding will break their fall with their arm and I think the position of the arm is in a position that is being used for support and not for the intent of contacting the ball. 13. Griezmann offside. This is a little confusing but it is upheld with some simple wording and understanding. It's tricky though, I will admit. "A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched by a team-mate is only penalized on becoming involved in active play by gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent by preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision..." Was Griezmann obstructing the play in any of these ways? No. Did he gain an advantage from a play that occurred while he started in an offside position? Yes. Did the player deliberately play the ball? Well, the wording for what constitutes "deliberate play of the ball" includes "has control of the ball with the possibility of passing the ball to a team-mate, gaining possession of the ball, or clearing the ball". That means you have no pressure and you're playing a controlled play (with the exception that you try to play a controlled play and simply mishit it). The defender had pressure and had to act instinctively rather than deliberately, leading to his offside opponent getting an advantage on his non-deliberate play. Offsides should be awarded. --- Again, I'd say the wording needs to be very specific when talking about the LOTG since many arguments people put up these days get indirectly proven correct by their arguments themselves! I truly do hope that fans become more aware of various Laws and I also hope they become simpler to understand in the future!
@@RhysRowlands-ve1tnI’ve been a referee for 10 and a half years. I have many skill levels of matches under my belt and have actually been fortunate enough to talk with many highly skilled officials throughout the time I’ve been officiating myself :)
Most pundits disagreed. If you've ever played, you know it is the unintentional effect of a natural kick of the ball. He's only looking at where the ball has gone throughout as well. It is unfortunate that Chillwell arrived too late to block the clearance, but in time to be in the way of the natural follow through.
I work in the Gambling Industry one of our key objectives is to be open and honest....VAR needs this the only way VAR could work is if we had live microphone from the VAR as it happens...open and honest
or any RB Leipzig CL game^^ Every single year the referees and the VAR make huge mistakes against Leipzig xD Correct goals are disallowed, fights/red worthy activities are ignored and will not be punished, offside lines are placed over the opponent's foot so that they are not offside etc etc etc but hey, CL referees generally don't seem to like German teams xD
The only call I agree with is the one for Pickford not getting punished. The challenge occurred during a time where play should have been cancelled due to the offside.
0:27 from here, you could’ve seen he could’ve gotten to worse injuries from either twisting, spraining.. even worse. The dislocation or breaking of an ankle
there is one that happened in the chelsea vs mancity fa cup semi final game where grealish did a handball in the box and it was never counted which made chealsea lose the game
Was it a red/yellow/other or not let’s see 0:36 it was none card he tried to get the ball and the players make no contract 1:14 it was onside or was it if u look Botton left there 2 more lines and the Liverpools players hands are speard between both so that’s why it was offside I think 1:51 it was a red card + penalty the Everton goaies makes a rush to tackle van dijk then he tried for the ball so yeah 2:38 it’s no PENTALY I think I saw in the rules if it hits your shoulder it’s not a pen 3:37 I can’t tell 4:25 it was a yellow he tried to get the ball but the Chelsea player moves forward to the West Ham player 5:17 it was a hand ball should of been a penalty 6:22 PENTALY the foot made clear contract no doubt 7:44 clear red card 9:28 it’s clear offside the goal scorers hand was in the line 10:33 it was a pen the goal touched his fingers I might be wrong it might have hit the newcastle players shirt 11:35 it’s a hand ball just finks off his hand 13:09 idk it was a bit of both 14:06 u got 0 iq it didn’t hit it hand it was around his hip
like spurs have gotten robbed against liverpool in previous seasons? the jota high boot that wasn’t a red card? they get all the decisions normally but as soon as one decision doesn’t go their way all of a sudden it’s a big deal? 😂
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Try counting them up agaIn. Liverpool and Wolves had by far the most wrong decisions against them this season and Man City almost never suffer bad decisions.
@@IZ4DAYZ_ I have. ESPN released a list of VAR mistakes admitted to by the Independent Key Match Incidents Panel through the season on 23rd May and Liverpool were adjudged to have had no VAR mistakes go for them and had 4 go against them. Oddly, they don't include Doku's karate kick which should have resulted in a penalty in the last minute of injury time against Man City. This being the opinion of pretty much every pundit. Even without counting the Doku, chest high, studs first challenge this was the highest net number of incorrect decisions against any club this season. Arsenal and Man City were balanced with the same number of decisions for and against them.
1:45 Firstly, a red card cannot be given for a challenge on a player in control of the ball inside the penalty area. Red cards for mistimed, bad challenged only apply to fouls that lead to a free kick, not a penalty. Secondly, if Van Dijk was offside in the build, that means that basically anything that happened after (in the realms of ordinary play) cannot be taken into consideration. Edit 1: 2:45 The premier league has FAR less stringent rules on handballs than many other competitions. I.e. in the prem, a handball cannot be called if the ball was going to hit the player's torso anyway. This one in particular is also a rule in most other competitions though. Edit 2: 5:30 Doesn't matter if the handball is voluntary or not. If it changes the trajectory of the ball, it's a handball. UEFA is particulary harsh on handballs. Edit 3: 11:49 Do I even need to say anything about this? I don't think even Uruguayans believe that this wasn't a penalty. Edit 4: 13:08 That goal was disallowed for the foul, not for an offside. Might be time to hang up the boots after this disasterclass of a video mate, not to mention the 25 mispronounced names
klopp was a cock to refs and went mad about everything...its human if someone screams and goes mad about everything the ref wont be your mate....bet klopp does not scream in a indian or chinese restaurants before he gets his food we all know what could happen...
Can someone explain to me why the Portugal vs Iran handball shouldn’t have been a penalty? It doesn’t matter if it was intentional or not, bro was flailing his arms around in an unnatural position which caused his arm to interfere with the ball’s trajectory in Portugal’s favour. If he had his arms at his side like you’re supposed to he wouldn’t have been able to hit the ball with his hand. To me that’s a very clearly warranted and legitimate penalty. I’m surprised they actually gave it since the refs usually try to favour the higher ranked teams and not the underdogs.
The VAR decision against Newcastle was definitely normal and the ref just stole PSG. A foul on Hakim not sanctioned and the first handball just like this one not sanctioned as well, ref stole PSG's victory that day
4:36 “Oh my bad I accidentally studded you in the knee” Doesn’t make it not a red Also at 5:30 I can accidentally leave my arm out and block a goal but it still is a handball
Many years ago, I emphasized that if football is a kind of match-fixing, investigation would take years to investigate. When VAR is implemented, and referee no longer the traditional referee, everything is being controlled. It is beyond our control, but it is rather out-of-control and/or under-control by FIFA. 🧘🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️🙏🏼🤲🏼
As much as I was looking forward to VAR in football as much I hate it today. Too much is too much. If VAR was kept just for offside positions and penalty decisions I'd say fine but it's used for everything and therefore just takes the whole pleasure of watching a football game. I compare it to watching a movie on tv and having 15 commercial breaks. In some countries like the US or Japan I've seen VAR used so much that extra-time lasts almost 20 minutes. Yes they're killing football. Wouldn't be surprised to see adds during the VAR decisions. Why not ?
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Oh do you want me to bring out the facts and stats for ya mate? You seem to be very anti liverpool here? I dont even like Liverpool mate but im telling you now, they've copped more against them due to VAR than anyone.
So sad, they don't have the Aston Villa - Chelsea game here. Where Chelsea scored in overtime, but VAR reruled it and disallowed the GOAL. the refs blowed for a foul 🤣
Football did NOT desperately need VAR. There were a few big mistakes over the times but there were far more enjoyable and fair games when VAR wasn't around.
The griezmann offside is legit. the same happened 2 times in Germany. A rebound or a touch from the opponent players does not count as a new action if the situation does not change. The ball was a pass and it succeeded even with the opponent hitting it before making it an offside.
10:35 lol bro do you understand how handball works? I don’t care about the champions league but I can clearly see that was an elbow changing the trajectory of the ball in the defender’s favour. It’s an unfortunate way to lose the lead but the call was definitely fair and I don’t see how anyone can argue otherwise.
I didn't watch it finish. Is the the Mane vs Ederson challenge? P.S: By right and fair play, Mane is outfield and open play, while Ederson dash out of the box. It is not consider a foul. 🧘🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️🙏🏼🤲🏼
The fans were booing.
The stadium: Empty
Stadium empty reminds me of anfeild
@@IZ4DAYZ_the emptyhad you mean?
@@Vtxyd_boxing higher attendence than anfeild mate
@@IZ4DAYZ_ If you've ever been to Anfield to watch a match, which I have, you will realise how untrue your comment is 👍
@@JustJake0903 mate your stadium attendences are so low plus the crowd only makes noise when a goal goes in, there is no atmosphere and you can always hear the opposition fans in the lfc V city game all I hear was city chants until you guys scores your team is quiet
"It was rigged that handball was called"
Also VAR: *clearly meets the handball requirement*😂
Bro this dude screwed up so many names 😂
Tottingham
'virgin van dijk' xD
Dude? DUDE?????
So didn't you heard V.E.R too 😂😂😂
Tunisha
That rodri handball still p!$$es me off even micah richards was calling it a clear handball, corruption at its fimest
It did not prevent a scoring opportunity or change of possession, so it's fine.
@@Kyrelel Those are not the only criteria for handball. It was handball.
It s no surprise the EPL ones involve Michael Oliver. One of the worst referees in EPL history. He tried to make the game about him rather than the football.
the ball was in but the player pushed the goalie in after he caught outside the goal line
@faizalharoun3930 Im here after Michael Olivers display for Man city 2 - 2 Arsenal 22 Sept 2024
Michael uae oliver
It’s got nothing to do with his incompetence when you see how much Man City paid him for friendlies
Bowen's disallowed goal vs Chelsea when he scraped the top of his boot over Mendy's arm when jumping over him is by far the worst I've seen when West Ham's involved.
Agree and I am a Chelseafan
You’re not wrong but also in West Ham vs chelsea soucek hand balled it and saved a shot which should’ve been a penalty
@@georgechadwick1214 A lot of poor decisions that game
Coyi ⚒️⚒️🫧🫧🫧
P Tierney is as bad as coot , new house in Wigan. Not, menstiond
In Germany's Bundesliga there was a match where the ref took half of the halftimebreak to evaluate VAR, then had both teams enter the pitch mid halftimebreak to perform the penalty he gave after reviewing VAR and after that sent them back to continue the break. According ot experts this was within the rules as written, but at the same time everybody watching it just knew this was wrong.
That was Mainz vs Freiburg, I believe.
I love it when he said the crowd were booing. No crowds during covid at West ham match
So out off the dozen or so "Worst VAR Decisions" at least 3 were correct, makes it totally worth it.
Yeah, it was a penalty to Portugal and Griezeman was offside, Kane was booked so VAR could not intervene whereas the ref took no action for Christies lunge on Saka today.
@@SirAntoniousBlock also he was lost for words when jones rightfully got sent off also the west 5am vs chelsea game was a red
@@OboOboGaming2025 Yep studs up.
Even though there was an offside decision before Pickford took out Van Dyck, the referee could have booked/sent off Pickford or dangerous conduct and overruled VAR. Let's say Pickford had deliberately punched Van Dyck, do you think the ref would have done nothing because there was an offside decision?
@@pimeye True, the ref can make whatever decision he wants.
1:29 Bro said virgin van dijk
💀
💀
You are so biased 😂😂😂😂 you are so obviously a Liverpool fan 😂😂😂😂
how is it biased..
U are right cuz the first one was also a mistake with the technology so biased😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
How these are obvious bad var discussions
Liverpool deserve to have more points this season. I don’t know any other team that is hated by refs. I’m a Brighton supporter btw
He is not biased is it just that Liverpool got robbed so many times 😢
Corrupted ref and var..😂
The crowed booed
The stadium:empty
Its recorded sound playing on stadium speakers
4:20 obvious red card. He pretty much steps on the bag of his leg, clear as day red card
Never a red, it is just a follow through from his kick. Looks bad because of where the foot ended up. Not dangerous, maybe a little painful but an accident. Common sense to not give a red there.
@connorfrost195 studs up on the back of his leg? Super Painful and it is a booking at least
@@Just_lucid_edits There was no intention to have studs landing on the back of the opposing players legs. Some times accidents happen in sport and players should not punished for what is just bad luck.
@connorfrost195 unlucky or not, many refs would book them
@@Just_lucid_edits and those refs would be wrong (especially if it is red)
Referee of 10 years now... I figured I'd make this comment to explain most of these calls, since people have a tendency to favor their opinions rather than the rules. Whoever wrote and approved the script for this really needs to learn the Laws Of The Game (LOTG) and also work on their wording. Also, I'd like to mention that I do not necessarily "agree" with the way the systems work but, in situations where rules exist for a sport, they must be upheld 100% of the way and I am simply explaining them. Some of these were good. Some were not. Let's touch on every call in this video and see which ones were correct and which were incorrect:
1. Robert Jones red. You showed the cleats on an almost straight-legged tackle catch Bissouma in the shin, with force. You can argue it's the ankle which receives some "leniency" from fans (why is beyond me). But the nature of this tackle is both reckless and dangerous. The force used was not negligible. No question about it being a red card.
2. Diaz offside goal. This is clearly an error. It was apologized publicly for. The audio for it was released. No matter who say sit, it's a true error. It was not "clear and obvious" but that does not matter for offsides in the EPL with their use of the lines (so saying it's "obvious" literally means nothing).
3. Pickford tackle on Virgil van Dijk. This one is a matter of understanding the LOTG. Pickford caught van Dijk. Correct. The player he "fouled" was offside, meaning the foul cannot be given. Correct. In that case, what is the red card supposed to be for? If the foul was given, it can be a no card, a yellow card for Unsporting Behavior, or a red card for Serious Foul Play. But with no foul given, the only argument to have is this is Violent Conduct. Here is the Violent Conduct wording:
"Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible."
Because he DID challenge for the ball, Violent Conduct is rules out. No card can be given. Very simple. It is very unfortunately to see players get injured, regardless of how. But we do not change the rules subjectively or situationally.
Also from the LOTG:
"In situations where an offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalized as it has occurred before the foul challenge".
4. Rodri handball. This is a tough one to argue in either way. The review for a handball has to be "clear and obvious" from a replay. In football (soccer), the LOTG states:
"For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit".
There is a diagram online that shows that is not considered for handball is the part that is covered by the sleeve (on a short sleeve shirt). No videos or images that you showed the ball strike below the sleeve of Rodri and in fact, every single video and image show it making contact with the sleeve at least halfway. This is the definition of NOT clear and obvious handling. No handball.
5. Sheffield goal denied. Firstly, this should not be in the video as this has nothing to do with VAR. Yes, this was something that unfortunately occurred and camera angles were there to prove it should have been given. As you mentioned, there was a malfunction with the technology occurred. In the EPL, the use of Goal Line Technology is used, not VAR. They technically cannot intervene to change anything. The best that we can hope for is the Assistant Referee has a clear angle that allows them to call the goal (if they're even allowed to at this point in the EPL) and then play gets stopped to award the goal. I doubt this would happen though because the Goal Line Technology would've been initially used to "disprove" the AR's call. Ultimately, this is extremely unfortunate and I personally hope they can create a method of preventing this in the future.
6. Red card for Balbuena. Balbuena definitely did not mean to stamp onto the leg of Chilwell. Intention is not assessed by referees. We simply look at the facts. Was the a stamp onto the leg? Yes. Was is negligible force? According to the referees and honestly anyone who has a working set of eyes, that's a pretty hard step onto the leg. As I mentioned previously, we do not change the rules subjectively or situationally. It's a red card.
7. Iran penalty. This one I can agree with the protests about. The distance from the ball was very small. The player's arm was in what I personally think is a natural position. In today's world, that wouldn't be given as a penalty. I don't believe the 2018 LOTG rules had any different things stated about handball. Unless they deemed the arm to be in an unnatural position, this appears to be a blunder.
8. Mitoma penalty controversy. This one seems to be a blunder as well (see, I can admit when something seems wrong). Initially it looks like Hojbjerg had a possible touch on the ball. The angle from the players' front (if you watch the slightly longer clip) does not show a clear touch or lack of a touch on the ball. If you slow it down, it appears like there may have been a VERY SLIGHT touch, though I'll be honest that I don't believe there was. In this case, VAR is looking to disprove a no-penalty which would mean clear and obvious no touch by the defender. They couldn't, so the call will stand as is. Personally I believe that this should have been because I don't believe there was a touch by the defender but I also fall into that "subjectively or situationally" category.
9. Kane no red card. First off, do not use the word "intent". Players, fans, and officials cannot truly know intent and cannot base decisions on intent. Now, in terms of the tackle... it is definitely a high boot, studs up, fast and aggressive challenge. I can agree that this should be a red card. The minimal contact made may have saved him in this case but I do believe that in any logical situation, a player would rather avoid getting hit by that than to suffer a potential injury.
10. Estupinan offsides. The lines do not lie. Are they in the right place? That's up to your opinion but I do think they may have put the lines on the wrong defender. As long as they checked both defenders with the lines to determine who was further, they're justified. I believe this one was also addressed in some form publicly. In the end, a better angle would've helped a lot, though.
11. Handball penalty call against Newcastle. A deflection off the side of a player from such a close proximity, into the elbow of their arm in a natural position of the elbow, should not be called a handball. This one was a shocker.
12. Handball against Uruguay. I'm not sure why this was deemed "unnaturally" positioned. A player sliding will break their fall with their arm and I think the position of the arm is in a position that is being used for support and not for the intent of contacting the ball.
13. Griezmann offside. This is a little confusing but it is upheld with some simple wording and understanding. It's tricky though, I will admit.
"A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched by a team-mate is only penalized on becoming involved in active play by gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent by preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision..."
Was Griezmann obstructing the play in any of these ways? No. Did he gain an advantage from a play that occurred while he started in an offside position? Yes. Did the player deliberately play the ball? Well, the wording for what constitutes "deliberate play of the ball" includes "has control of the ball with the possibility of passing the ball to a team-mate, gaining possession of the ball, or clearing the ball". That means you have no pressure and you're playing a controlled play (with the exception that you try to play a controlled play and simply mishit it). The defender had pressure and had to act instinctively rather than deliberately, leading to his offside opponent getting an advantage on his non-deliberate play. Offsides should be awarded.
---
Again, I'd say the wording needs to be very specific when talking about the LOTG since many arguments people put up these days get indirectly proven correct by their arguments themselves! I truly do hope that fans become more aware of various Laws and I also hope they become simpler to understand in the future!
Holy, that was long but I will read it
Are you a leauge manager?
Reffere I meant
@@RhysRowlands-ve1tnI’ve been a referee for 10 and a half years. I have many skill levels of matches under my belt and have actually been fortunate enough to talk with many highly skilled officials throughout the time I’ve been officiating myself :)
@@pkmeister9993what leagues where you the referee of?
That balbuena stamp on chilwell deserved a redcard and var got it spot on
Most pundits disagreed. If you've ever played, you know it is the unintentional effect of a natural kick of the ball. He's only looking at where the ball has gone throughout as well. It is unfortunate that Chillwell arrived too late to block the clearance, but in time to be in the way of the natural follow through.
Now Liverpool cant win the Title because of stupid VAR Mistakes, truly shameful.
And they bottle every title race they're in😂😂
Griezman was obviously offsides😂😂😂
Looking for this comment hahaha
I work in the Gambling Industry one of our key objectives is to be open and honest....VAR needs this the only way VAR could work is if we had live microphone from the VAR as it happens...open and honest
_"I work in the Gambling Industry"_
So it's mostly your fault then.....
VAR has Destroyed the beauty of football
Wanna see bad VAR decisions just watch every wolfes games lol
*Wolves (but I agree with your comment).
or any RB Leipzig CL game^^ Every single year the referees and the VAR make huge mistakes against Leipzig xD
Correct goals are disallowed, fights/red worthy activities are ignored and will not be punished, offside lines are placed over the opponent's foot so that they are not offside etc etc etc
but hey, CL referees generally don't seem to like German teams xD
The only call I agree with is the one for Pickford not getting punished. The challenge occurred during a time where play should have been cancelled due to the offside.
If the players is offside and gets fouled it doesn't matter its offside
@@ArthurHouse exactly
What? He still fouled him. If I throw a punch at an approaching attacker does it get ruled out just bc it is offside?
@@AverageKopite yeah but in situations of offside. The play after the call should have been made is not counted.
@@AverageKopite and there’s a difference between assaulting someone than committing a foul that shouldn’t have occurred.
0:27 from here, you could’ve seen he could’ve gotten to worse injuries from either twisting, spraining.. even worse. The dislocation or breaking of an ankle
You forgot Liverpool vs man city when doku kicked macallaster
VAR poor decisions, manager's should take their players off the pitch
there is one that happened in the chelsea vs mancity fa cup semi final game where grealish did a handball in the box and it was never counted which made chealsea lose the game
Vid was two weeks ago game was yesterday
@@LFCfan94 yeah
Never a penalty, natural position and didn't change the course of the ball
NO, it didn't make Chelsea lose the game. 90 mins of football made Chelsea lose the game.
@@thediddymen1408 plus chelsea would have lost anyway..its what they do best
I stopped watching after 40 seconds
Same
Man says first tackle wasn't red that was a clear red hit on the ankle like that
I cracked on but you were right to stop
@@DimitriOnZolZA you are stupid, he never said that.
@@DimitriOnZolZAok, ball played but whatever suits
I just noticed this guy has 263 subscribers I was expecting around 1.24M😮
He has 553
942
961
1.18k
1.36k
Was it a red/yellow/other or not let’s see
0:36 it was none card he tried to get the ball and the players make no contract
1:14 it was onside or was it if u look Botton left there 2 more lines and the Liverpools players hands are speard between both so that’s why it was offside I think
1:51 it was a red card + penalty the Everton goaies makes a rush to tackle van dijk then he tried for the ball so yeah
2:38 it’s no PENTALY I think I saw in the rules if it hits your shoulder it’s not a pen
3:37 I can’t tell
4:25 it was a yellow he tried to get the ball but the Chelsea player moves forward to the West Ham player
5:17 it was a hand ball should of been a penalty
6:22 PENTALY the foot made clear contract no doubt
7:44 clear red card
9:28 it’s clear offside the goal scorers hand was in the line
10:33 it was a pen the goal touched his fingers I might be wrong it might have hit the newcastle players shirt
11:35 it’s a hand ball just finks off his hand
13:09 idk it was a bit of both
14:06 u got 0 iq it didn’t hit it hand it was around his hip
In the first one, the Diaz goal was actually a rob
Nobody cares liVARpool get all the decisions their way just because 1 goes against you does not make you special
like spurs have gotten robbed against liverpool in previous seasons? the jota high boot that wasn’t a red card? they get all the decisions normally but as soon as one decision doesn’t go their way all of a sudden it’s a big deal? 😂
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Try counting them up agaIn. Liverpool and Wolves had by far the most wrong decisions against them this season and Man City almost never suffer bad decisions.
@@Dunk1970 go look at the statistics mate
@@IZ4DAYZ_ I have. ESPN released a list of VAR mistakes admitted to by the Independent Key Match Incidents Panel through the season on 23rd May and Liverpool were adjudged to have had no VAR mistakes go for them and had 4 go against them.
Oddly, they don't include Doku's karate kick which should have resulted in a penalty in the last minute of injury time against Man City. This being the opinion of pretty much every pundit.
Even without counting the Doku, chest high, studs first challenge this was the highest net number of incorrect decisions against any club this season. Arsenal and Man City were balanced with the same number of decisions for and against them.
The editing was so on point great video
1:45 Firstly, a red card cannot be given for a challenge on a player in control of the ball inside the penalty area. Red cards for mistimed, bad challenged only apply to fouls that lead to a free kick, not a penalty. Secondly, if Van Dijk was offside in the build, that means that basically anything that happened after (in the realms of ordinary play) cannot be taken into consideration.
Edit 1: 2:45 The premier league has FAR less stringent rules on handballs than many other competitions. I.e. in the prem, a handball cannot be called if the ball was going to hit the player's torso anyway. This one in particular is also a rule in most other competitions though.
Edit 2: 5:30 Doesn't matter if the handball is voluntary or not. If it changes the trajectory of the ball, it's a handball. UEFA is particulary harsh on handballs.
Edit 3: 11:49 Do I even need to say anything about this? I don't think even Uruguayans believe that this wasn't a penalty.
Edit 4: 13:08 That goal was disallowed for the foul, not for an offside.
Might be time to hang up the boots after this disasterclass of a video mate, not to mention the 25 mispronounced names
Lies again? Gangbang Of Decisions Google Drive
Bloody hell, all of these and not 1 wolves incident. You could make a whole series about times we've been robbed by cheating officials.
Agree. Wolves by far have been the most wronged club in the PL when it comes to VAR, followed closely by Liverpool.
Since this video was published, EPL referee David Coote has been show to be vehemently anti-Liverpool.
klopp was a cock to refs and went mad about everything...its human if someone screams and goes mad about everything the ref wont be your mate....bet klopp does not scream in a indian or chinese restaurants before he gets his food we all know what could happen...
Cricket var are a 10 time better than football ⚽ var
Bro I bet that even the var gets bored of watching the games 😂
yes cricket for life ❤
@@yobo_257bro I bet the football var gets even bored of watching the games
@@Duaabid7 bro just copied my joke 💀
@@yobo_257 nah I didn’t tho ur sport is ‘even boring’ wich means even more boring than our sport
That penalty against Uruguay was the most clear handball you could ever ask for. How in the world is that a wrong decision?
Both Portugal games are perfectly fine. Handball from the header, handball from the nutmeg!!
How isn't the lampard disallowed world cup goal 2010 against Germany not here??
There was no VAR
Can someone explain to me why the Portugal vs Iran handball shouldn’t have been a penalty? It doesn’t matter if it was intentional or not, bro was flailing his arms around in an unnatural position which caused his arm to interfere with the ball’s trajectory in Portugal’s favour. If he had his arms at his side like you’re supposed to he wouldn’t have been able to hit the ball with his hand. To me that’s a very clearly warranted and legitimate penalty. I’m surprised they actually gave it since the refs usually try to favour the higher ranked teams and not the underdogs.
Manchester United fans are just reading the comments
Tottenham vs Liverpool never dissapoints😂
The VAR decision against Newcastle was definitely normal and the ref just stole PSG. A foul on Hakim not sanctioned and the first handball just like this one not sanctioned as well, ref stole PSG's victory that day
The Villa keeper saved it. Greatest save in history
Finally someone who says football instead of soccer
A liverpool and a CR7 fan,,,,for Portugal vs Iran that's a very clear handball 😂
Bro said toanhaam😂😂
the crowed booed
THE STADIUM IS EMPTY
QATAR VS INDONESIA U23 THAT WAS CRAZY VAR NOT WORK.
4:36
“Oh my bad I accidentally studded you in the knee”
Doesn’t make it not a red
Also at 5:30 I can accidentally leave my arm out and block a goal but it still is a handball
Many years ago, I emphasized that if football is a kind of match-fixing, investigation would take years to investigate. When VAR is implemented, and referee no longer the traditional referee, everything is being controlled. It is beyond our control, but it is rather out-of-control and/or under-control by FIFA.
🧘🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️🙏🏼🤲🏼
1:31 Bro really said Virgil DaN DjiK
West Ham vs Chelsea sending off was correct I reckon. The WH player has deliberately followed through on Chiswell there. He knew what he was doing.
1:21 MERRY SIDE DIERBIE 🗣🔥🔥🔥
Mersy side
@@RANDOM-1k00 i know, im making fun of his pronounciation you fool
If this happens now, imagine what happened during Pele's matches.
8:48 first time volley 😂i dont think he watches football
The penalties for Iran and Portgal (vs Uruguay) were corect decisions. Griezman`s offside was also correct.
How thar karate kick wasn't a pen i will never no
You lost me at Meeareside Derby
Today Lucas Vasquez looking for the contact to get the penalty and the VAR not overturning it or even going to the monitor.
Guy who knows nothing about football judges people who know everything about football
As much as I was looking forward to VAR in football as much I hate it today.
Too much is too much.
If VAR was kept just for offside positions and penalty decisions I'd say fine but it's used for everything and therefore just takes the whole pleasure of watching a football game. I compare it to watching a movie on tv and having 15 commercial breaks.
In some countries like the US or Japan I've seen VAR used so much that extra-time lasts almost 20 minutes.
Yes they're killing football. Wouldn't be surprised to see adds during the VAR decisions. Why not ?
That game with Newcastle versus PSG break my fucking heart I lost 24,000 because of that wrong decision😢🤦🏽♂️
This should’ve been a Man City compilation
You mean a liVARpool one honestly we get every decision against us what you on about kid
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Yep. Its actually a table showing LIVERPOOL is one of the most effected by VAR not just this season alone but the last 3 seasons.
@@Beejayd1zL you got that incorrect mate
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Oh do you want me to bring out the facts and stats for ya mate? You seem to be very anti liverpool here? I dont even like Liverpool mate but im telling you now, they've copped more against them due to VAR than anyone.
You've definitely been influenced by the media to believe this media narrative haven't you, think for yourself
Blades v Villa wasn't a relegation scrap. Villa were struggling, but the Blades were closer to Europe than relegation that season
The West Ham Red Card is a true red card. He is in control of his body and he has to take responsibility for his actions.
Nothing has changed, you can add at least two more from Liverpool v Fulham yesterday 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
Rodri one was not handball,
it didnt hit his hand or arm, the angle was bad, it hit much higher than a arm was.
alan, check your vision. clear handball
It didnt hit his ARM, it hit the STUMP of his arm
That is not handball,
and it was not intenitonal
and did nothing
So sad, they don't have the Aston Villa - Chelsea game here.
Where Chelsea scored in overtime, but VAR reruled it and disallowed the GOAL. the refs blowed for a foul 🤣
Ehm.. I agreed with many of these.
Villa red card ✅
Van Dijk offside ✅
Cedric hand ball ✅
Portugal penalty ✅
Griezman offside ✅
Kane yellow carded (so VAR cannot get involved) ✅
1:30 virgin van dijk😂😂😂
If Sheff Utd's goal had correctly stood, then Villa would have been relegated that season.
Football did NOT desperately need VAR. There were a few big mistakes over the times but there were far more enjoyable and fair games when VAR wasn't around.
Hard to decide whether it is incompetence or dishonesty or both!
Crimes against humanity these decisions, we need to scrap it for next season.
Mike Dean is a Tottenham fan's. 😂😂😂
The griezmann offside is legit. the same happened 2 times in Germany. A rebound or a touch from the opponent players does not count as a new action if the situation does not change. The ball was a pass and it succeeded even with the opponent hitting it before making it an offside.
One happened yesterday. Newcastle v Brentford.
Michael Oliver what a surprise no penalty in Liverpool Derby.
Did you guys see the 2 leg Europa League Qf Roma vs Milan pen check
10:35 lol bro do you understand how handball works? I don’t care about the champions league but I can clearly see that was an elbow changing the trajectory of the ball in the defender’s favour. It’s an unfortunate way to lose the lead but the call was definitely fair and I don’t see how anyone can argue otherwise.
Really scary 🚫🚫😱🤯
So many var wrong against Liverpool this season we would of won the season
This is why I think 🤔 VAR is ruining football ⚽️
Guys i think he may not be a liverpool fan
Liverpool v arsenal first leg this season
1:31 who Van Dijk 😂
im getting angry just watching this....and im only 2 minutes in!!
I honestly think city could punch players in the face and get a yellow card
You will never never learn that Man City has 0 charges
A heated merry side derby? Whats that? Virgin van Dijk? Who's that?
one of the worst VAR desicions is Faul on Alexis by Doku. ManCity would have no point!
Can add the England penalty against the Netherlands in the 2024 euro semifinals
Virgin van Dijk😂 1:31
The van Dyke incident was the correct call. Learn the laws of football.
Come back when you can spell van dijk
The Liverpool one at the beginning is clearly a red card. That's studs to the shin. It endangers the safety of his opponent
I didn't watch it finish. Is the the Mane vs Ederson challenge?
P.S: By right and fair play, Mane is outfield and open play, while Ederson dash out of the box. It is not consider a foul.
🧘🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️🙏🏼🤲🏼
West Ham fans booed😂😂😂 when it was an empty stadium
He is correct because he was onside😂
Non of Liverpool content against the Liverpool 😂
a heated meryside derby 1:20