Your definition of "goes wrong" is different from mine. The pilots were fighting a very strong cross wind and decided to go around, which was the right decision in my opinion. Nothing wrong with that.
yeah, thats my only annoyance with this channel. If someone breathed slightly too heavy they'd caption it with "person struggling to breathe barely makes it out alive"
There is nothing to pride about when a plane should go-around but didn’t. The pilots can even be investigated if they didn’t go-around. Pilots are trained and encouraged to go-around.
@@tonamg53 Yes, with crew resource management training being widely accepted, you don't get that "I am the captain" mentality like it was 20 or 30 years ago. And not as much scheduling stress thrown onto the crew from the airline management,
My first go around was when I was 14 and we were coming over SFO which the landing strip starts over the ocean so you don't see tarmac until the last bit. So we were like "we're wavering wtf" then you hear the engines rev up lmao, only to see the runway disappear. Crosswinds. I'm 36 now and I still remember that.
Not true at all. If nothing went wrong, then there would've been no reason for the A330 to go around; or for the other A330 to abort its takeoff. I mean did you not see the compressor stalls on the 767 forcing them to shut the engine down and return for landing? I'd hate to see your definition of something "going wrong."
@@Mike_294 I can understand that point of view. If nothing "goes wrong" then it should be a textbook landing. But you have to expect anomalies and trust your airmanship to compensate for it.
Me, on that Ryanair 737: OMG did you SEE that Airbus almost hit the ground with his wing? Amazing! Ryanair Stewardess: That'll be a €19.99 surcharge for unplanned inflight entertainment then, how would you like to pay, Sir?
@@Anmeteor9663 What is this Ryanair hate? I've probably flown them twenty times, never had any issues. It's not luxurious by any means, but it get's you from A to B on time.
Gosh yeah, I flew from Liverpool to Krakow no problem but on the way back I got charged for my carry-on. The same I took on outward flight with no issues they charged for on inward. Needless to say a stern email was sent right after
@@Mats-Hansen They'll get you from A to B on time, or not at all. Don't expect any assistance what so ever if there's the least little problem. Even at Stanstead (the Ryanair hub) the poor sap sat under a sign marked INFO couldn't as much as direct me to the nearest cyber cafe so that I could log on their website, find a suitable flight, buy a ticket, find somewhere to print a boarding card ..
I love this channel. It doesn't matter what I'm watching or what I came to UA-cam to do, I click on 3 Minutes of Aviation as soon as I get the notification ♥
Aviators would say that nothing went wrong with this landing, since pilots wisely executed a "Go-Around"... one of aviation's saving graces and makes a landing right!
I think you've got the last one wrong. I have a feeling the Virgin was told to cancel takeoff clearance as the Etihad was too close and told to go around.
Actually you might got it wrong as the video were cut at 2:35 and you don’t know how long it was actually before the Etihad was told to go around. Its unlikely that the ATC would allow the Virgin to enter the runway if Etihad was really that close. When landing and takeoff on the same runway, ATC will prioritised the landing plane first.
Honestly it’s a great the pilots made the decision to go around on the first clip, that looks like a very rocky landing, it would’ve definitely gone wrong had they made the choice to land. Poor passengers probably panicking 😅
I was on virgin atlantic a330-300neo a month ago. It’s good I wasn’t on that one!! I’ve been following this series for a year now. Keep up the good work!!!
Man, the possibilities if ... the last clip took place on a foggy day, and the control tower purposely tells the Etihad pilot that the runway is clear for landing ...
That A350-1000 that's supposed to be taking off with a simulated engine failure---why is there clear and obvious exhaust coming from BOTH engines as it climbs out? Look at the video starting at 1:28, with a noticeable couple of puffs of exhaust at around 1:31, and really obvious heated exhaust plumes from both engines from 1:35 to 1:38. It doesn't look like a simulated engine out procedure to me...any explanation as to why both engines seem to be running at high output?
Wasn’t even close to a wing strike, simply went around because of instability, very routine. The rejected takeoff wasn’t, it was a clearance cancellation due to separation issues.
I love during the go around when the plane is all wobbly on the deceleration, that as soon as it goes back to full power for the go around, the power and gyroscope of the engines instantly stabilizes the plane.
Don’t quote me, but I’m fairly sure for some aircraft, the gear retraction process actually creates more drag while the doors are also open, so it is better to get a fair bit more airspeed with gear out first.
would the Etihad really have been able to land if the virgin a330 didn't suffer a rejected take off? just seems really close.....I know planes land and take off every 45 seconds from Heathrow but always assumed that was utilising both runways. Either way pretty impressive stuff!
without getting into it too much, the video is cut. once the Virgin stops there's a cut in the video. It then shows the one going around. Generally if you clear a plane for take off and its rolling by the time the inbound is at 3nm it will work (using basic assumption. There are of course a million factors that can change what I just said.).
The pilots,engineers and designers should be applauded for the advancements in technology and skills that it takes to do certain things in planes that keep all of us and themselves safe when flying in one of these incredible machines.
*computer voice:* minimums Pilot: Bet you can't land a wildly unstabilized approach in gusty crosswinds Copilot: hold my beer Pilot: *presses toga* we both failed this checkride
Hi bro! Nice video bro... Continue with the same spirit. Well, l've seen towards the end of your videos, there is an option to watch the next video, how do you that bro, kindly? Thanks.
@@_sebastiandomi_ Yes, this channel's video compilations use videos taken by other people. If you look at the description you'll see the original videos credited.
Interesting in the V1 engine failure simulation 1:25 the pilot does not climb much, wait for the plane to get more speed, you can see the plane yaw because of one engine, and only when he has reached enough speed, _THEN_ he goes into a positive climb. Very instructive!
@@hotrodray6802 - The technique the pilot used was to get the speed up with one engine before increasing the climb. Nothing in the video contradicts that.
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 - Please, tell me what it is. With a smaller plane taking off on grass (especially if it is tall or thick), there is a technique to get the plane off the ground as quickly as possible and lowest speed, then go level until you get it up, then climb. That's just an example, it depends on whatever situation you are faced with. If an engine fails after V1, you are going to have a problem, get the speed up so you can get a positive climb. Of course, the length of the runway and possibly other things, but that is why we still have pilots to make decisions. I have actually done this in simulator, but not in a real plane.
If only car drivers had the same presence of mind as airline pilots. Split-second TOGA decisions are really impressive. Far too many drivers think, "I can do this. Yeah. No problem. Here we go... " and then regret it.
Not even close to a wingstrike. But I could tell you a story about being in an A340 and trying to land in HKG just after a hurricane went through there.
Looks like that was landing on 23R ... many years ago (pre second runway) I witnessed a BA 747 arrival (Islamabad) on 06 (much more prone to windshear) the roll was so bad that No1 engine struck the ground. I reported the damage when I met the aircraft to provide fuel service.
That landing is exactly why I was not asked to do the voice work on the airbus warning system... Soon as the tail came up, I turned into Samuel L Jackson... "Go around MFer!" Would have been entirely appropriate from the warning system though...
Just as well it wasn't an Aerosucre plane coming in behind the Virgin (rejected) take-off. Saying that Aerosucre would probably touch down halfway down the runway so it might have missed anyway!
Why did the A350 kept the gear down? Seems to me that whit reduced power you would want to get the gear up sooner. May it be to avoid the extra drag of the gear doors?
At least for the 747, there is additional drag while the gear is being retracted. The standard procedure is to keep it down. Might be it is the same here.
Test/certification flights almost always leave the gear down. Just one less variable to think about on the first flights if the gear will come down and not jam or get stuck in the retracted position.
@@kuebbisch only on the very first flight. This was single engine testing. They wouldn’t be worried about the gear being able to work or not. This is more like worst case scenario.
Your definition of "goes wrong" is different from mine. The pilots were fighting a very strong cross wind and decided to go around, which was the right decision in my opinion. Nothing wrong with that.
Second That !!
yeah, thats my only annoyance with this channel. If someone breathed slightly too heavy they'd caption it with "person struggling to breathe barely makes it out alive"
The "goes wrong" part is quite obvious to me. The aircraft doesn't land on their first go therfore having to initiate a go around.
@@gabrielmihet Happens all the time in bad weather very glad he "goes wrong " and went around.
@blackvulcan100 what you mean "he goes wrong" as in the pic?
I like to see "go arounds" shows me the pilot is more concerned about safety than their pride
There is nothing to pride about when a plane should go-around but didn’t. The pilots can even be investigated if they didn’t go-around. Pilots are trained and encouraged to go-around.
@@tonamg53 Yes, with crew resource management training being widely accepted, you don't get that "I am the captain" mentality like it was 20 or 30 years ago. And not as much scheduling stress thrown onto the crew from the airline management,
Pride should come from knowing you'd choose safety over "let's see how good we are in cross-winds".
what pride are you even talking about fool. lol. pilots performs toga when something they can't control happens. like wind gust or a car on a runway
My first go around was when I was 14 and we were coming over SFO which the landing strip starts over the ocean so you don't see tarmac until the last bit. So we were like "we're wavering wtf" then you hear the engines rev up lmao, only to see the runway disappear. Crosswinds. I'm 36 now and I still remember that.
I saw nothing that 'went wrong' in any of these clips. What I saw was 3 minutes of professional airmanship.
This channel has amazing content but it's ruined by its clickbaity titles. Not the first time and probably not the last
True, great pilots who did the right thing and managed to land safe in a tricky situation
Not true at all. If nothing went wrong, then there would've been no reason for the A330 to go around; or for the other A330 to abort its takeoff. I mean did you not see the compressor stalls on the 767 forcing them to shut the engine down and return for landing? I'd hate to see your definition of something "going wrong."
@@Mike_294 I can understand that point of view. If nothing "goes wrong" then it should be a textbook landing. But you have to expect anomalies and trust your airmanship to compensate for it.
@@chefduane3742 That is completely besides the point. In each instance something clearly went wrong.
Me, on that Ryanair 737: OMG did you SEE that Airbus almost hit the ground with his wing? Amazing!
Ryanair Stewardess: That'll be a €19.99 surcharge for unplanned inflight entertainment then, how would you like to pay, Sir?
Your own fault for even thinking about flying Ryanair!🤣
Lol
@@Anmeteor9663 What is this Ryanair hate? I've probably flown them twenty times, never had any issues. It's not luxurious by any means, but it get's you from A to B on time.
Gosh yeah, I flew from Liverpool to Krakow no problem but on the way back I got charged for my carry-on. The same I took on outward flight with no issues they charged for on inward. Needless to say a stern email was sent right after
@@Mats-Hansen They'll get you from A to B on time, or not at all.
Don't expect any assistance what so ever if there's the least little problem. Even at Stanstead (the Ryanair hub) the poor sap sat under a sign marked INFO couldn't as much as direct me to the nearest cyber cafe so that I could log on their website, find a suitable flight, buy a ticket, find somewhere to print a boarding card ..
This is a good example of “The A330 either butter’s or it doesn’t land”
why an argument in every comment section?
I agree
The best example I have seen
Unless it’s Ryanair
So weird to me to call it butter. Only on UA-cam. Never heard it. Greaser yes. Butter no.
@@mvpfocus in 30 years of flying, I’ve never heard pilots say butter. First time was on these UA-cam channels with mostly 14 year olds it seems.
Idk why but I'm always fascinated by the tests they go through. Things I never would have thought of. Love this channel.
That last clip though...
1:44 Nah bro, that's just the new anti lag from Boeing..
"Boeing 767 Neo" that's how I read it...
Underrated comment, BuT aCsHuAlLy it should be called a P&W anti-lag
They added such a feature in MD 81 for a stupid reason, before taking over Boeing. Look up the Gottröra incident.
I love this channel. It doesn't matter what I'm watching or what I came to UA-cam to do, I click on 3 Minutes of Aviation as soon as I get the notification ♥
Thanks for the kind words!
Same here. All credit to the spotters out there capturing these events.
The NEOS 767 just can't seem to get that left afterburner to light :)
Comercial planes have no afterburners...
@@1zanglang u seriously didn’t get the joke? 😳
@@1zanglang Tell us you didn't get the joke without telling us you didn't get the joke :)
@@1zanglang that one did, couldn't you see the fire ?
It always blows my mind that even a single engine can lift one of these huge birds into the air!
So cool, dass es in der Schweiz war!
Structure:- m i joke to you?
Aviators would say that nothing went wrong with this landing, since pilots wisely executed a "Go-Around"... one of aviation's saving graces and makes a landing right!
I think you've got the last one wrong. I have a feeling the Virgin was told to cancel takeoff clearance as the Etihad was too close and told to go around.
I agree. Seems Virgin was stopped to allow Etihad to overfly on a go around.
Actually you might got it wrong as the video were cut at 2:35 and you don’t know how long it was actually before the Etihad was told to go around.
Its unlikely that the ATC would allow the Virgin to enter the runway if Etihad was really that close.
When landing and takeoff on the same runway, ATC will prioritised the landing plane first.
Agree 100%, it was an incursion.
Agree 100%. Way too close.
exactly
Honestly it’s a great the pilots made the decision to go around on the first clip, that looks like a very rocky landing, it would’ve definitely gone wrong had they made the choice to land.
Poor passengers probably panicking 😅
"probably" 🙈 😧 🙈
@@tonyt8805 definitely an understatement 😭😭
That A350's takeoff had pure Aerosucre style!
Some pretty good stuff here.
0:36 The sound of the spool up is intoxicating!
YES after my 12 years of existence, something interesting has finally happened at Manchester, my nearest airport
Be healthy and live 100 years! How nice that a child looks at airplanes and not just at war games!
@@iuliandragomir1 tbf Fortnite and stuff like that is reaaalllly bad rn
@@froggy251 You will have more bad things in your live! Happy new Year!❤❤❤
Unfortunate
@@iuliandragomir1 imma be 12 in like 2 months. Love planes!
I was on virgin atlantic a330-300neo a month ago. It’s good I wasn’t on that one!!
I’ve been following this series for a year now. Keep up the good work!!!
Man, the possibilities if ... the last clip took place on a foggy day, and the control tower purposely tells the Etihad pilot that the runway is clear for landing ...
@WRIGHT-SAMUEL04oh. that makes sense
@WRIGHT-SAMUEL04 ok. good to know!
Ryanair can destroy a landing just by being in the frame
That A350-1000 that's supposed to be taking off with a simulated engine failure---why is there clear and obvious exhaust coming from BOTH engines as it climbs out? Look at the video starting at 1:28, with a noticeable couple of puffs of exhaust at around 1:31, and really obvious heated exhaust plumes from both engines from 1:35 to 1:38. It doesn't look like a simulated engine out procedure to me...any explanation as to why both engines seem to be running at high output?
Because it’s simulated
A good crew always leave that go around in their back pocket, ready to use at moments notice.
Well done captain and crew 👍
I live for the intro music!❤
Oh my, I'm sorry.
Outro music gang for life!
You must be 12
Edit: 8
The music is so horrible
Seriously....
Virgin Atlantic a330 saw the Ryanair parked next to the runway and was inspired .
The VS A330 roll correction was genius❤️, the margin for error is ...
A330: Fuck, too slow, try again.
787-9: Bruh..
Wasn’t even close to a wing strike, simply went around because of instability, very routine. The rejected takeoff wasn’t, it was a clearance cancellation due to separation issues.
I love during the go around when the plane is all wobbly on the deceleration, that as soon as it goes back to full power for the go around, the power and gyroscope of the engines instantly stabilizes the plane.
Your videos never disappoint. Best 3 mins of my day 😍
2:56 actually. False advertising I say. 😖
FO: "captain, bird-strike and compressor stall on engine number one!"
CAPTAIN: "acknowledged, shutting down engine number two!"
The outro music is truly the best
1:24 Why no gear retraction with a positive rate of climb? Seems like the flight crew would want to clean up ASAP.
Probably part of the test specs to be able to climb even with gear down and increased drag
gear is down for lot of testing,I think so that the crew has one less thing to worry about if they have to emergency land
Don’t quote me, but I’m fairly sure for some aircraft, the gear retraction process actually creates more drag while the doors are also open, so it is better to get a fair bit more airspeed with gear out first.
Excellent video!
Great videos 😊
1:30 is some decent camera skills
Someone owes me 3 more seconds of aviation! I'll wait right here..
A joke that was never seen before.....
would the Etihad really have been able to land if the virgin a330 didn't suffer a rejected take off? just seems really close.....I know planes land and take off every 45 seconds from Heathrow but always assumed that was utilising both runways. Either way pretty impressive stuff!
without getting into it too much, the video is cut. once the Virgin stops there's a cut in the video. It then shows the one going around.
Generally if you clear a plane for take off and its rolling by the time the inbound is at 3nm it will work (using basic assumption. There are of course a million factors that can change what I just said.).
@@MW-zm8sd ah yeah! You’re right, just noticed the cut as well. Thanks
Yeah I'm sure the caption was backwards, takeoff rejected by tower due to 787 on top of them!
this is manchester, not london
Props to all the pilots of these aircraft; training and skills go along way to protect the flying public.
That one engine takeoff looked very Aerosucre!
It seemed to me that both engines had exhaust on that simulated engine loss.
Loved the sound of the Virgin's engines spooling up 😍
Doesn’t have to do anything with the fact that it’s from Virgin
@@ZeroGravity23 Actually it does, as I am a huge lifelong fan of the Virgin brand
@@masr8875 Then explain
A stabilised approach seems a little bit relative when storms start pushing the heavies around.
This channels is great!
at 74 years old this is the best part of the day (other than watching dentures soak)...thanks for sharing
The pilots,engineers and designers should be applauded for the advancements in technology and skills that it takes to do certain things in planes that keep all of us and themselves safe when flying in one of these incredible machines.
That Ryanair plane on the taxiway, watching the Virgin A330 land: “pfff…they got nothin’ on us”
I have a different definition of "goes wrong"
No Aerosucre today? Hahaha!
1:40 - I've had dreams about this, primarily because I watch too much "3 Minutes of Aviation," and I'm prepping for a flight in about a week.
I was there when there was a testflight of the a350 ! Basel-Mulhouse is my home airport
Didn't see any near wing strike on the Virgin.
They love to over exaggerate in their video titles. Just need to call it what it is!! We’ll still watch it 👍
*computer voice:* minimums
Pilot: Bet you can't land a wildly unstabilized approach in gusty crosswinds
Copilot: hold my beer
Pilot: *presses toga* we both failed this checkride
😂😂
The weather in Manchester is almost always grey wet and windy so they're used to landing in strong crosswinds.
The more often I watch these video, the less keen I am on flying.
Hi bro! Nice video bro... Continue with the same spirit. Well, l've seen towards the end of your videos, there is an option to watch the next video, how do you that bro, kindly?
Thanks.
Хорошо, чо на второй ушел. Молодец! А помпаж двигателя- как они сели то?
I know the A350-1000 from somewhere :P
Thank you ;-)
From Airbus
This Video is filmed by Laurent my friend!!! You use Videos of other Users…!
@@_sebastiandomi_ Yes, this channel's video compilations use videos taken by other people. If you look at the description you'll see the original videos credited.
1:28 The Power of Rolls Royce Engine!
1:50 god that sound gives me anxiety idk why
Is that the same Virgin Atlantic plane? That plane gets into a lot of trouble.
Interesting in the V1 engine failure simulation 1:25 the pilot does not climb much, wait for the plane to get more speed, you can see the plane yaw because of one engine, and only when he has reached enough speed, _THEN_ he goes into a positive climb. Very instructive!
Look at the exhaust.
Both engine producing full power right before the steep climb.
@@hotrodray6802 - The technique the pilot used was to get the speed up with one engine before increasing the climb. Nothing in the video contradicts that.
That’s not the prescribed technique
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 - Please, tell me what it is.
With a smaller plane taking off on grass (especially if it is tall or thick), there is a technique to get the plane off the ground as quickly as possible and lowest speed, then go level until you get it up, then climb. That's just an example, it depends on whatever situation you are faced with. If an engine fails after V1, you are going to have a problem, get the speed up so you can get a positive climb. Of course, the length of the runway and possibly other things, but that is why we still have pilots to make decisions.
I have actually done this in simulator, but not in a real plane.
@@D800Lover no. That is not correct. Feel free to search how airliners fly EFATO
What happened to the Virgin Airbus A330 Low speed rejected take-off? Engine fail?
Turned off tail light illumining “Virgin” on 2nd approach?
If only car drivers had the same presence of mind as airline pilots. Split-second TOGA decisions are really impressive. Far too many drivers think, "I can do this. Yeah. No problem. Here we go... " and then regret it.
I'm a nervous flyer. I would have died listening to that popping engine on the NEOS 767 lol
Being a ble to control these huge airplanes with crosswinds must take otherworldly skills!!!
Is Aerosucre on vacation? Asking for a friend.... 😂
First time: near wing strike...
Second time: butter landing, and in the same conditions than before
Was the first and the last clip the SAME Aircraft?? 😂
Top Class Pilots!
Not even close to a wingstrike. But I could tell you a story about being in an A340 and trying to land in HKG just after a hurricane went through there.
Engine failures must be more common than we think. Glad the pilots have the training and the planes are designed to handle that!
Depends on how often you think they fail.
The Virgin was unstable then wind shear, werent it
What wing strike ?
Ryanair pilots: Looked good to me
Looks like that was landing on 23R ... many years ago (pre second runway) I witnessed a BA 747 arrival (Islamabad) on 06 (much more prone to windshear) the roll was so bad that No1 engine struck the ground. I reported the damage when I met the aircraft to provide fuel service.
Clearly an unstable approach after minimums with the A330. Looked like wind shear. What was the captain thinking in not going around sooner!
I would like to see the Metar of that day in Manchester
That landing is exactly why I was not asked to do the voice work on the airbus warning system... Soon as the tail came up, I turned into Samuel L Jackson... "Go around MFer!" Would have been entirely appropriate from the warning system though...
Wow windy day at least it landed
Just as well it wasn't an Aerosucre plane coming in behind the Virgin (rejected) take-off. Saying that Aerosucre would probably touch down halfway down the runway so it might have missed anyway!
Are Aerosucre on strike????
Hgggg
Q
I remember when u where at 1k
00:28 microburst???
Be it any weather condition, The A330 will always butter 🧈
oh...no!!!
Ryanair: I'm everywhere
one little line comes loose and there is no saving it. one small part malfunctions
Imagine looking over beautiful Barcelona, then KA-BAM
You owe me 3 seconds of aviation
Why did the A350 kept the gear down? Seems to me that whit reduced power you would want to get the gear up sooner. May it be to avoid the extra drag of the gear doors?
I assume they were testing worst case scenario.
At least for the 747, there is additional drag while the gear is being retracted. The standard procedure is to keep it down. Might be it is the same here.
Test/certification flights almost always leave the gear down. Just one less variable to think about on the first flights if the gear will come down and not jam or get stuck in the retracted position.
@@mreese8764 no there is not. Standard procedure is to raise the gear as soon as possible. We never keep the gear down.
@@kuebbisch only on the very first flight. This was single engine testing. They wouldn’t be worried about the gear being able to work or not. This is more like worst case scenario.
My left ear enjoyed that.
What is V!?
0:45 Manchester, where all the rubbish weather is in UK
that last one was not rejected. That was a air traffic control issues for sure
What exactly went wrong according to your opinion?
Lots of issues with the Virgins today.
I think the Virgin pilot saw the RyanAir jet and was like, "Oh hell no, I'll wait."
last video virgin pilot: ''what did i do wrong???''
It all goes on at Manchester
poor etihad😢